26
1 High Reliability Organiza1ons Managing Risk in Complex Opera4ng Environments Presenta4on at the AFPM Annual Mee4ng March 17, 2016

High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

1

HighReliabilityOrganiza1onsManagingRiskinComplexOpera4ngEnvironments

Presenta4onattheAFPMAnnualMee4ngMarch17,2016

Page 2: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

Complexity is stretching the capabilities of most organizations

TECHNOLOGYPRODUCTS&SERVICES

PROCESSES

ORGANIZATIONS

REGULATIONS

MARKETS

X

X X

X

X COMMUNICATIONS

Page 3: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

Complexity grows exponentially

3

#Items #links

1 0

2 1

3 3

4 6

5 10

10 45

$

Complexity

Page 4: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

4

Characteristics of complex systems

1. Non-linear reactions

3. Unknown interactions

2. Feedback loops

4. Emerging properties

Page 5: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

Many companies are passing a complexity threshold

5

VALUE(diminishingreturns)

COST&RISK(exponen4algrowth)

$

Complexity

Fewcompaniesares.llhere

Manycompaniesarehere

Anincreasingnumberofcompaniesarehere

Page 6: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

Increased complexity

Poor execution

Loss of process control

Poor performance

Added processes Vicious

Complexity Cycle

The typical response to complexity is to add even more complexity

Page 7: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

Catastrophic incidents are becoming more frequent and more severe

1979–Three-MileIslandcoremeltdown1988–PiperAlphaexplosion2005–TexasCityRefineryexplosion2010–SanBrunoPipelineexplosion2010–BPDeepwaterHorizonoilspill2011–FukushimaDaiichidisaster2013–WestFer1lizerplantexplosion

Page 8: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

8www.wilsonperumal.com

Traditional risk management doesn’t address these “normal accidents” well

Too complex to anticipate

Too fast to address

Too infrequent to understand

Page 9: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

9www.wilsonperumal.com

The Pessimist’s View

“Regardlessoftheeffec4venessofmanagementandopera4ons,accidentsinsystemsthatare

characterizedby4ghtcouplingandinterac4vecomplexitywillbe

normalorinevitableastheyoTencannotbeforeseenorprevented.”

Page 10: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

WilsonPerumal&Company,Inc. 10

Yet a few High Reliability Organizations seem to defy the Pessimistic View!

Page 11: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

The Nuclear Navy has never had a reactor accident over its

50+yearhistory

150mobilenuclearreactors

6,000+yearsofreactorplantopera4on

11www.wilsonperumal.com

Page 12: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

12

Three Lessons from the Nuclear Navy

#1 Safety should not be a GOAL!

#2 Simplify your management system

#3 Culture is critical

1

2

3

Page 13: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

13

Lesson #1

Achieving zero incidents should not

be a

It should be an

Page 14: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

14

This has important implications for what we reward

Page 15: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

15

Lesson #2: Simplify your management system

Page 16: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

16www.wilsonperumal.com

The Nuclear Navy simplifies with one management system for all outcomes

PeopleProcess

EquipmentChange

KeyControls

Safety

PeopleProcess

EquipmentChange

KeyControls

Environ-mental

PeopleProcess

EquipmentChange

KeyControls

Quality

PeopleProcess

EquipmentChange

KeyControls

Reliability

PeopleProcess

EquipmentChange

KeyControls

Cost

CommonManagementSystemApproach

NuclearNavyManagementSystem

PeopleProcess

EquipmentChange

IncreasedperformanceAcceleratedlearning

Reducedcostandoverhead

SafetyQuality

Environmental

Reliability

Compliance

Cost

KeyControls

Page 17: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

WilsonPerumal&Company,Inc. 17

Havingoverlycomplexmanagementsystemscanbeveryexpensive

“If[theQEMS]hashadanimpact,it’sprobablyanega1veimpact.”–EngineeringMgr.

Thecostofmee1ngQEMSrequirements… doesnottranslatetohighperformance

taskexecu4onishighlyvariableamongdivisions(~50%variabilityinrework/revisions)

highlevelofrework(17%)andrevision(4%)whileexternalfindings/auditareincreasing

majorityofreports(44-72%)past6daytargetwhencompe4torsdeliverin1-3days

repe44veauditfindingsindicatelackofprocessimprovement

adequatetomaintaincompliancewithISO&OHSASü

û

û

û

û Improvement

Efficiency

Accuracy

Consistency

ComplianceCostEs1matesforQEMS Range

FulfillingQEMSRequirements

Operators $26–67M

Engineers $17–31M

Con1nuousImprovement

CARProcessing1 $200K–2M

InternalAuditProgram1 $100K–700K

QEMSMaintenance1 $200K–800K

Governance QEMSGroup2 $3M

TOTAL ~$50M–100M

Page 18: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

Lesson #3: Culture is critical

18

Page 19: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

19www.wilsonperumal.com

Culture is the Nuclear Navy’s last layer of defense

Rob

ust E

quip

men

t

Rig

orou

s P

roce

dure

s

Cul

ture

Page 20: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

20

The culture required was a vast departure from traditional military culture

Tradi1onalMilitaryCulture

Followorders

Dowhatyouaretold

Don’taskques4ons

Neverques4onyoursuperiors

Rickover’sCulturalPillars

Haveahigherlevelofunderstanding

Followprocedures

Ques4onprocedureswhenthingsdon’tseemright

Backeachotherup

Doitallwithintegrity

Page 21: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

LevelofKnowledge

Formality

Ques1oningAktude

ForcefulWatchTeamBackup

Integrity

LEVE

LOFKN

OWLEDG

E

FORM

ALITY

QUESTIONINGATTITUDE

FORC

EFULBA

CKUP

INTEGRITY

CONTINUITYOFPOWERREACTORSAFETY

Safety and reliability depend on specific operator behaviors

21www.wilsonperumal.com

The“PillarsoftheProgram”

Page 22: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

WP&C has worked with the Nuclear Navy to benchmark its culture

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00

Seekthecompany'ssuccessBeresultsorientedWalkthetalkFollowproceduresCon4nuallyseekgreaterknowledgeAlwayscollaborate

Confi

den4

al

Payalen4ontohierarchyandstatusDowhatyouraretoldCompetewithpeersWorklonghoursCoverthemistakesofothersPunishfailure/mistakesShortcutsaretolerated

ChangeCurrentvs.Target=32%

40Characteris1cs

TargetCultureCurrentCulture

AveragerankingforCurrentvs.TargetCultures

MostLikeUsNotLikeUs

Page 23: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

Ques4oningAotude Formality Integrity ForcefulWatchTeamBackup

LevelofKnowledge

Current

The Navy describes itself consistently with the Five Pillars

MostLikeUs

NotLikeUs

RangeClient

RangeNavy NavyAverage

ClientAverage

Page 24: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

24

Three Lessons from the Nuclear Navy

#1 Safety should not be a GOAL!

#2 Simplify your management system

#3 Culture is critical

1

2

3

Page 26: High-Reliability Organizations: Managing Risk In Complex Operating Environments

ThankYou

26

ChrisSeifertPartner,[email protected](972)800-3618www.wilsonperumal.com

Signupforourblogatwilsonperumal.com/blog