Upload
influencefinder
View
1.102
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The first public presentation of the next generation SEO tool, InfluenceFinder. Using science to filter large lists of URL InfluenceFinder spiders link maps to identify actionable relevant and authoritative sites. Consider it to be MajesticSEO and Linkscape on steroids
Citation preview
Link Building Outside Of The BoxThe Appliance Of Link Science
With
Our Objectives
To define a scientific methodology that reduces massive lists of potential linking partners…
to actionable lists of relevant authorative sites that improve search engine rankings
Firstly – who’s got most backlink data?
Methodology
• Working with Econsultancy• We exported the backlink
information from Google Webmaster
• Then looked for commonality of linking domains against MajesticSEO & Linkscape
Commonality
Google Webmaster
Tools
MajesticSEO
Moz Linkscape
InfluenceFinder
Linkscape1,041 Domains
337 In GWM
Google Webmaster (GWM)5,189 Domains
MajesticSEO8,448 Domains
2,051 DomainsIn GWM
4,123 DomainsRefreshed & Enlarged
Sub-set Of Majestic SEO
1,681 In GWM
Learnings
Evidence suggests Google Webmaster Backlink Export does not provide all the links that Google knows
about
We will be producing more research on this as we increase the sample size
Either way, the list size is too big
Moving Beyond A Big List
Lets clean it with some science
The Science Approach
• Fresh Data– We had our bots re-index the backlink page data ensuring
it’s fresh– Our aim is to turn interesting fresh data into useful data for
link builders– We use a lot of science to filter and clean the list – here
are two techniques
Finding Blogs
• Why– Because we know that blogs are good and accessible link
targets
• How – Using Decision Trees we can detect blog presence to 94%
accuracy
Blog Decision Trees
• When our bots read site source code we use decision trees to maximize the probability of our answer to questions like ‘is this site a blog?’ being correct
• Statistical techniques like decision trees provide 94% accuracy
• Using the decision tree technique on the eConsultancy link structure…
Back To Econsultancy Data
• New smaller list• 2,723 blogs to be precise
(from 8,400 domains examined by our bots)
• But we wanted to qualify even further
• We wanted to find those who had a “heartbeat”
• So lets apply some more science
Some Of Our Heartbeat Algorithm
• Filtering sites by their publishing frequency is strong filter
• So we looked at frequency updates in the eConsultancy linking blogs
• Also filter by whether feed or natural publisher
Some Feed, Some Natural
Lapsed Bloggers Likely To Be Natural
Auto Feed Publishers & Natural High
Volume
Did the science work then?
Conclusion
• Science can turn large lists of link prospects into accurate, actionable lists.
• Better lists result in more conversations with the sites that matter
• Using our science, what took MyDeco a day, took them just an hour