14
Anthony Suchman, MD, MA Co-Creating Healthy, Innovative and Humane Organizations, Networks and Eco Systems: A Global Discovery Roundtable October 3, 2013 Relational Coordination in Healthcare McArdle Ramerman Center

Relational Coordination in Healthcare - Suchman

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Co-Creating Healthy, Innovative and Humane Organizations, Networks and Eco Systems: A Global Discovery Roundtable

Citation preview

Page 1: Relational Coordination in Healthcare - Suchman

Anthony Suchman, MD, MA

Co-Creating Healthy, Innovative and Humane Organizations, Networks and Eco Systems: A Global Discovery Roundtable

October 3, 2013

Relational Coordination in Healthcare

McArdle Ramerman Center

Page 2: Relational Coordination in Healthcare - Suchman

Operations Agents

Pilots

CabinCleaners

Caterers

BaggageAgents

GateAgents

RampAgents

TicketAgents

FreightAgents

Mechanics

Fuelers

FlightAttendants

Passengers

Flight departure process: A coordination challenge

© 2012 Relational Coordination Research Collaborative and McArdle Ramerman Center2

Page 3: Relational Coordination in Healthcare - Suchman

c 2012 Jody Hoffer Gittell

Shared goals

Shared knowledge

Mutual respect

Frequent communication

Timely communication

Accurate communication

Problem-solving communication

Relational Coordination

Page 4: Relational Coordination in Healthcare - Suchman

c 2012 Jody Hoffer Gittell

Relational coordination and flight departure performance

Efficiency Quality

Gate time/ flight

Staff time/ passenger

Customer complaints

Lost bags

Late arrivals

Relational coordination -.21*** -.42*** -.64*** -.31* -.50**

Flights/day -.19**** -.37*** -.30*** .13 -.22+

Flight length, passengers, cargo

.79*** .45*** .13 .12 -.54**

Passenger connections .12** .19** .09 .13 .00

R squared .94 .81 .69 .19 .20

Page 5: Relational Coordination in Healthcare - Suchman

c 2012 Jody Hoffer Gittell

Relational coordination and flight departure performanceQ

uality

/effi

cie

ncy p

erf

orm

an

ce

ind

ex

AMR2

AMR1

UNI2

UNI1

CON1 UNI3

CON2

SWA2

SWA1

Relational coordination

Page 6: Relational Coordination in Healthcare - Suchman

CaseManagers

Physical Therapists

NursesAttendingPhysicians

NursingAssistants

SocialWorkers Technicians

ReferringPhysicians

Administrators

Patients

Patient care:A coordination challenge

© 2012 Relational Coordination Research Collaborative and McArdle Ramerman Center6

Page 7: Relational Coordination in Healthcare - Suchman

c 2012 Jody Hoffer Gittell

Relational coordination and surgical performance

Length of stay

Patient satisfactio

n

Freedom from pain Mobility

Relational coordination -.33*** .26*** .08* .06+

Patient age .02 .00 .01 .04

Comorbidities .09* .07 .01 .04

Pre-op status .03 .01 .20*** .28***

Surgical volume .11** .10* .06+ .03

R Squared .82 .63 .50 .22Observations are patients (n=878) in hospitals (n=9). Model also included gender, marital status, psychological well-being and race. Standardized coefficients are shown.

Page 8: Relational Coordination in Healthcare - Suchman

c 2012 Jody Hoffer Gittell

Qu

ality

/effi

cie

ncy p

erf

orm

an

ce

ind

ex

Hosp2

Hosp1

Hosp7

Hosp3Hosp9

Hosp5

Hosp6

Hosp8

Hosp4

Relational coordination

Relational coordination and surgical performance

Page 9: Relational Coordination in Healthcare - Suchman

c 2012 Jody Hoffer Gittell

Relational coordination also improves worker outcomes

Reduces emotional exhaustion and burnout

Increases professional efficacy

Increases job satisfaction

Increases career satisfaction

Increases capacity to learn from failure

Page 10: Relational Coordination in Healthcare - Suchman

c 2012 Jody Hoffer Gittell

Applications of Relational Coordination

Fostering group reflection to improve organizational, workgroup and individual performance

Proactive team-building

Page 11: Relational Coordination in Healthcare - Suchman

c 2012 Jody Hoffer Gittell and Anthony Suchman

Dimension of Relational Coordination

Average for All Work Groups

Average for Physicians

Individual Low Score

Individual High Score

Frequent Communication

4.47

4.31 3.74 4.72

Timely Communication

3.81

3.72 3.22 4.00

Accurate Communication

3.97

3.94 3.69 4.14

Problem-Solving Communication 3.63

3.40 2.76 3.89

Shared Goals

3.85

3.62 3.36 3.77

Shared Knowledge

3.53

3.52 3.31 3.62

Mutual Respect

3.60

3.32 2.97 3.65

Overall Relational Coordination

3.88

3.74 3.44

3.98

Results of First Relational Coordination Survey

Page 12: Relational Coordination in Healthcare - Suchman

c 2012 Jody Hoffer Gittell and Anthony Suchman

Avg for all

groups

Physavg

Phys 1 Phys 2 Phys 3 Phys 4 Phys 5

T1

T2

3.88

4.08

3.73

4.10

3.58

4.19*

3.98

4.23

3.84

4.02

3.44

3.84

3.87

4.07

Pre- and post-intervention survey scores

Page 13: Relational Coordination in Healthcare - Suchman

c 2012 Relational Coordination Research Collaborative and McArdle Ramerman Center

Improving relational coordination

Mutual respect Communication skills Team-building Relational meeting practices Process reflection Leadership development

Shared goals Assessing convergence Collaborative planning Dialog

Shared knowledge “Conversations of interdependence”

Page 14: Relational Coordination in Healthcare - Suchman

Bibliography

Gittell JH. High Performance Healthcare. New York: McGraw Hill; 2009

Relational Coordination Research Collaborative http://rcrc.brandeis.edu

Summary of research on the association of RC with various dimensions of organizational performance available at:http://MakeWorkingBetter.com/RC

Suchman A, Sluyter D, Williamson P. Leading Change in Healthcare. London: Radcliffe, 2011