Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure
Case Studies
Value Capture
Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure Stephen Engblom Senior Vice President Global Director, Cities [email protected] Twitter: @stephengblom Sydney, March 15, 2017
Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure
Case Studies • San Francisco, CA • Brooklyn, New York City, NY
Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure
Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure
Engineering Performance
Social Benefit
Environmental Benefit Financial
Cost
Economic development / employment Air quality Water quality Community development Natural Resources
TBL Model
Triple Bottom Line Approach : Balancing the Value Proposition
Traditional Emphasis
Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure
4
Resiliency tools, Triple Bottom Line Approach
Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure
Triple Bottom Line Primary Objectives 1. To inform and support the analytical process
for developing alternatives by considering social and environmental components in the process alongside performance and economic considerations
2. To provide decision-making support for project leaders; and
3. To increase project selection transparency and facilitate a reporting-out of expected project benefits.
4. Creates a comparative database of projects.
5
Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure
TBL follows a basic set of principles
6
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission: Storm Sewer Improvement Program, San Francisco Balance of green and grey infrastructure approaches and innovative design.
Case Studies
$3.5B USD
Cost of public elements over
20 years
Health and Well Being HW1 Food Exposure HW2 Heat Island HW3 Access to Open Space / Recreation HW4 Community Stablization HW5 Local Employment Opportunities
Economy and Society ES1 Community Cohesion ES2 Safe Routes ES3 Local Private Investment ES4 Leverage City Resources ES5 Cost Effectiveness ES6 Long term Sustainability
Infrastructure and Environment IE1 Resource Recovery IE2 Water Quality IE3 Resilient and Responsive to Natural Disasters IE4 Investment in Habitat
Leadership and Strategy LS1 Community Preparedness LS2 Community Education
Significantly positive Positive Neutral Negative Significantly negative Unknown / TBD / NA
$
LS1
LS2
LS3 HW1
HW2
HW3
HW4
HW5
ES1
ES2
ES3
ES4
ES5 ES6 IE1
IE2
IE3
IE4 $
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission: Storm Sewer Improvement Program Soundness of Approach - Proposed Process: Measurement of Co-benefits Triple Bottom Line: Equity, Economy and Environment
Case Studies
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
NYC has a housing crisis
Case Studies
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
NYC’s vacancy rate is 3.45%
Case Studies
city to be?
Case Studies
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
The majority of NYC’s residents are rent burdened.
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
NYC needs more jobs
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
Flooding
Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure NEW JERSEY
G O VERNOR ISLAND
SUNSET PARK
RED HOOK
BROOKLYN S
132 ACRES
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
2000 0 4000 N
9 New Subway
BQX
Subway Line
Planned Ferry Stop Ferry Route
F D R N G
9 New subway extension to Red Hook
$
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
Alternatives to a wall
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
Protecting the edge
$
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
Triple Bottom Line Model
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
Weighing costs and benefits
N
KEY
ENVIRONMENTAL E1 GHG Emissions Per Capita E2 Water Quality E3 Connected Habitat E4 Green Coastal Protection E5 Tree Coverage
SOCIAL S1 Community Resiliency S2 Employment S3 Parks Per Capita S4 Pedestrian & Bicycle Environment S5 Accessible Waterfront S6 Access to Jobs by Transit S7 Housing Growth S8 A
FINANCIAL F1 Cost to Revenue Gap F2 New Tax Revenue
GROWTH EQUITY
RESILIENCY SUSTAINABILITY N
E1 GHG Emissions Per Capita E2 Water Quality E3 Connected Habitat E5 Tree Coverage
E4 Green Coastal Protection S1 Community Resiliency
S3 Parks Per Capita S4 Pedestrian & Bicycle Environment S5 Accessible Waterfront S6 Access to Jobs by Transit S8 A
F1 Cost to Revenue Gap F2 New Tax Revenue S2 Employment S7 Housing Growth
What do you
city to be?
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
TBL Goals tied to guiding principles
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
Red Hook today
city to be?
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
Infill development
city to be?
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
Infill development
25Mft2
What do you want your city to be?
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
25Mft2
35Mft2
What do you want your city to be?
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
What do you want your city to be?
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
35Mft2
45Mft2
What do you want your city to be?
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
What do you want your city to be?
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
45Mft2
Reimagining South West Brooklyn, NYC
Case Studies
Comparing outcomes
Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure
Case Studies
Value Capture
Decision Making Frameworks for smart infrastructure Stephen Engblom Senior Vice President Global Director, Cities [email protected] Twitter: @stephengblom Sydney, March 15, 2017
