Upload
karen-martin
View
4.586
Download
5
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Value Stream Mapping: Strategy Before Tactics
WebinarAugust 23, 2012
Karen Martin
Founder: Karen Martin & Associates, LLC (1993).
Consultant / Coach: Lead Lean transformations & develop people in office, service and knowledge environments.
Teacher: University of California, San Diego’s Lean Enterprise program.
Author:
Karen Martin, Principal
Just released! 2nd Edition October 2012!
Value Stream Mapping’s Roots
3
Mike Rother & John Shook, 1999 Beau Keyte & Drew Locher, 2004
Whenever there is a product for a customer, there is a value stream.
The challenge lies in seeing it.
— Mike Rother & John Shook, Learning to See
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Value Stream Defined
Value Stream: All of the activities, required to fulfill acustomer request from order to delivery (and beyond tocash received).
Customer
4
Value Stream
Process ProcessProcess
CustomerRequest
CustomerReceipt
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Why Value Stream Mapping?
5© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Value Stream Mapping Benefit #1:Seeing the Whole
6
60,000 foot view; Rooftop view
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
VSM Promotes Systems Thinking
7
Individual Efficiency = Sub‐optimization
System Efficiency = Optimal Value Stream
Performance
Value Stream Mapping Benefit #1:Seeing the Whole
8
60,000 foot view; Rooftop view
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
TruthTruth
TruthTruth
TruthTruth
TruthTruth
Truth9
Value Stream Mapping Benefit #2
How are we really performing?What’s our customer really experiencing?
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
10
Value Stream Maps Serve as Visual “Storyboards”
Makes the disconnects and obstacles to flow visible at a macro level
Shows the linkage between material and information flow
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
11
AMBIGUITY
Problems Nearly Always Extend Outside the Functional Silos in Which They’re Discovered
12© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Value Stream Mapping Benefit #3:Consensus Building
13© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Value Stream Mapping Benefit #4:Metrics-Based
14
What are you going to do to change the numbers?
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Outpatient Imaging Value StreamProjected Results
15
MetricCurrent
StateProjected
Future State%
Improvement
Lead Time 32.5 hrs 11.3 hrs 65%Process Time 56 mins 43 mins 23%Percent Activity 2.9% 6.3% 117% Rolled First Pass Yield 29% 40% 38%
# Macro Steps 14 11 21%Tech turnover(annual) 100% 25% 75%
Note: Freed capacity (PT reductions) allowed the organization to earn $500,000 additional annual revenue w/o increasing staff.
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Value Stream Mapping Benefit #5:Strategy Before Tactics
16
Where am I? Where do I want
to go?
I‐80 option I‐40 option I‐70 option
Which route should I take?
? ??
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
The Work We Do:Degrees of Granularity
17
Value Stream
Process Process Process
Step Step Step
Value Stream Map
In the Weeds
(Tactical)
Rooftop View
(Strategic)
Metrics-Based Process Map
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
18
Value Stream Mapping Projects,
Kaizen Events, Just‐Do‐Its
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
19
Value Stream Mapping:As Much Art as Science
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Key VSM Components:Manufacturing
Process 1 Process 2 Process 3 Process 4
SUPPLIER CUSTOMER
Production Control
Inform
ation Flow
Prod
uct F
low
Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes
Hours Hours Hours
Timeline
1
2
3
I I I
LT
PT
ABC Widget Value StreamCurrent State Map
Demand = 1,800/year 08/08/2012
Facilitator: Sally Parker
Hours
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Key VSM Components: Office / Service
Process 3 Process 4
CUSTOMER
Inform
ation Flow
Prod
uct F
low
Timeline
1
2
3PT
LT
I.T. I.T. I.T.
Process 1 Process 2
XYZ Value StreamCurrent State Map Demand = 250/year
08/08/2012Facilitator: Robert Parker
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Current State Value Stream Map Outpatient Imaging Services
Demand = 15 per day
Customer Demand:15 patients per Day
(Takt Time 1920 seconds)8 hours per day
Referring Physician
% C&A = 65 %
Check-in Patient
(Admitting)
Cycle Time = 2 mins.% C&A = 90 %
5
Send Reports
(Imaging)
Cycle Time = 3 mins.% C&A = 90 %
6
Hospital
5 mins.
ScheduleAppointment
Cycle Time = 11 mins.Lead Time = 12 mins.% C&A = 98 %
6
Pre-register Patient
Cycle Time = 30 mins.Lead Time = 990 mins.% C&A = 100 %
5
CT=Cycle Time LT=Lead Time %C&A=% Complete & Accurate
Lead Time = 12 mins.Lead Time = 990 mins.
PrepPatient(Tech)
Cycle Time = 10 mins.% C&A = 100 %
2
Check-inPatient
(Imaging)
Cycle Time = 1 mins.% C&A = 98 %
3
CompleteExam(Tech)
Cycle Time = 15 mins.% C&A = 90 %
2
TransmitImages(Tech)
Cycle Time = 3 mins.% C&A = 100 %
2
Read/DictateExam
(Radiologist)
Cycle Time = 15 mins.% C&A = 95 %
2
TranscribeReport (MDI)
Cycle Time = 5 mins.% C&A = 75 %
6
ReviewDraft/Sign
(Radiologist)
Cycle Time = 1 mins.% C&A = 95 %
2
PrintReports
(Imaging)
Cycle Time = 1 mins.% C&A = 99 %
230 mins. 5 mins. 248 mins. 365 mins. 960 mins. 110 mins. 120 mins.45 mins.
E Pay
Excel
ADS
Symposium
Internet
Waiting RoomManagement
System
Fax OrderSolutions
PACS
5 mins.
Lead Time = 24 days
Meditech
1234
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Auto Fax 50% Us Mail 25%MD Mailbox 25%
Rework Loop via Fax 25% of the time
Rolled First Pass yield = 29%
5 minutes
2 minutes 11520 minutes
1 minutes
45 minutes
10 minutes
30 minutes
15 minutes
5 minutes
3 minutes
248 minutes
15 minutes
365 minutes
5 minutes
960 minutes
1 minutes
110 minutes
1 minutes
120 minutes
3 minutes
L/T = 13464 minutes
VA/T = 11576 minutes
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Value Stream Mapping ProcessDefine
Product Family
Design Future State
Document Current State
Implement!
3 Day Event
Foundation (the basis) for the future state; 70‐80% accurate isacceptable (directionally correct)
Create flow by eliminating waste (now obvious from yourcurrent state map); typically 3‐6months out
Products (good or services) withcommon process steps
Repe
at
The goal of mapping!
Create Implementation Plan
Include accountability andtimeframes for completion
24
Interim Briefing(s)
1 Contact Information2 13 24 35 4
51 62 73 84 95 10
1 Contact Information2 13 24 35 4
1234 Date: Date:
Signature:Date:
Potential Obstacles ApprovalsExecutive Sponsor…to the team's success with the mapping activity.
Implementation Plan
Current state VSM FunctionFuture state VSM SMEs that may not be needed full time
Always a nice touch; keeps the team from wandering.
Need ample wall space
Planned Deliverables On-Call Support
Aim for objectives w/ measurable targets (from X to X). Goals & Measureable Objectives
Why are you doing this? What are the current state issues? FunctionLeadership-heavy
Event Drivers Mapping Team
List required attendees; others are optional
Briefing Attendees
Boundaries & Limitations
FS Implementation Timeframe
What is the team NOT authorized to change?
Typically 90-120 days
Last Step Task on last process block
Value Stream Mapping CharterEvent Scope Leadership / Coordination Schedule
Start/End Times
VP or C-level
If needed - often Director or Manager level
Specific Conditions
What circumstances you're including and excluding? (type of cust, time of year, etc.)
Value Stream Champion
Contract processing, rebate processing, etc. Executive SponsorValue Stream Event Date(s)
Team Lead Not always needed
Skilled person leading the activity
Meals Provided?
Location
CoordinatorThe person arranging logistics (reserving the room, ordering food, sending meeting notices, etc.)
Facilitator
First Step Task on first process block
Customer Demand
Trigger
How many times is this done per wk, qtr, mo, or yr.?
What need does the value stream address?
Signature: Signature:
3 days typically; sequential is best
6 hrs minimum; 7 or 8 is best
FacilitatorValue Stream Champion
Aid in consensus building and organizational learning.
Name
Name
Team-Based Improvement ActivitiesRules of Engagement
1. The team starts and ends the day together; begin and end breaks together.
2. No interruptions or distractions – 100% focus; phones on silent; no email; no texting.
3. Rank has no privilege.4. Seek the wisdom of ten instead of the knowledge of one.5. Use creativity before capital (in designing improvements).6. Finger-pointing and blame has no place: “It is what it is.”7. Respectful disagreement is encouraged. (It’s OK to disagree; it’s not
OK to be disagreeable.)8. No veto power from outside the team.9. No silent objectors; don’t leave in silent disagreement.10. One conversation at a time; no side bars.11. What’s said in the room stays in the room.12. Ask Why? Why not? What if?13. Ban “Can’t” and “No, because…” from your vocabulary. Think/say:
“Yes, if…”14. Ban internal, silo’d thinking; think externally (customer); value stream. 25
Step 1 – Label Map
• Label your map in upper right corner:– Value stream name– Current or future state– Customer demand (volume of work per time
period)– Takt time (if relevant)– Date– Facilitator’s name (and/or team)
26© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Takt Time: The Key to Continuous Flow
27
Available work timeTakt time =
Customer demand
480 minutes/dayTakt time = = 10.7 mins
45 new accounts/day
OR…Time Available divided by what Kustomer Takes
“Touch Down”
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Step 2 – Define Process Blocks
• Identify all blocks in the process (target 5-15 blocks)– Each block (post-it) contains an activity or group of activities that
occurs before a significant break in the timeline occurs (typically build up of WIP or handoff)
– Customer icon is placed in upper right or middle• Upper right if supplier exists (supplier is placed in upper left)• Middle position if a separate supplier doesn’t exist
– Supplier (if relevant) is placed in upper left– Activity format is verb/noun – what happens to what– Include the function who performs the task– If relevant, include number of workers who perform the task– Include any major barriers to flow – batches, shared/inaccessible
resources, system downtime, etc.– When possible, walk the process!
28© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Step 3 – Define I.T. Systems
• Identify all I.T. systems used in the process and information flow– For most VSMs, these are placed above the process
blocks– In very complicated VSMs with two rows of process
blocks, I.T. systems can be placed between the rows, if necessary.
– Note any scheduling that occurs (calendar, system, etc.)– Who tells whom to do what? How do they tell them?
29© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Current State Value Stream Map Outpatient Imaging Services
VSM Champion: Paul Scanner Created: July 17, 2007
Demand = 15 per day
Customer Demand:15 patients per Day
(Takt Time 1920 seconds)8 hours per day
Referring Physician
% C&A = 65 %
Check-in Patient
(Admitting)
Cycle Time = 2 mins.% C&A = 90 %
5
Send Reports
(Imaging)
Cycle Time = 3 mins.% C&A = 90 %
6
Hospital
5 mins.
ScheduleAppointment
Cycle Time = 11 mins.Lead Time = 12 mins.% C&A = 98 %
6
Pre-register Patient
Cycle Time = 30 mins.Lead Time = 990 mins.% C&A = 100 %
5
CT=Cycle Time LT=Lead Time %C&A=% Complete & Accurate
Lead Time = 12 mins.Lead Time = 990 mins.
PrepPatient(Tech)
Cycle Time = 10 mins.% C&A = 100 %
2
Check-inPatient
(Imaging)
Cycle Time = 1 mins.% C&A = 98 %
3
CompleteExam(Tech)
Cycle Time = 15 mins.% C&A = 90 %
2
TransmitImages(Tech)
Cycle Time = 3 mins.% C&A = 100 %
2
Read/DictateExam
(Radiologist)
Cycle Time = 15 mins.% C&A = 95 %
2
TranscribeReport (MDI)
Cycle Time = 5 mins.% C&A = 75 %
6
ReviewDraft/Sign
(Radiologist)
Cycle Time = 1 mins.% C&A = 95 %
2
PrintReports
(Imaging)
Cycle Time = 1 mins.% C&A = 99 %
230 mins. 5 mins. 248 mins. 365 mins. 960 mins. 110 mins. 120 mins.45 mins.
E Pay
Excel
ADS
Symposium
Internet
Waiting RoomManagement
System
Fax OrderSolutions
PACS
5 mins.
Lead Time = 24 days
Meditech
1234
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Auto Fax 50% Us Mail 25%MD Mailbox 25%
Rework Loop via Fax 25% of the time
Rolled First Pass yield = 29%
5 minutes
2 minutes 11520 minutes
1 minutes
45 minutes
10 minutes
30 minutes
15 minutes
5 minutes
3 minutes
248 minutes
15 minutes
365 minutes
5 minutes
960 minutes
1 minutes
110 minutes
1 minutes
120 minutes
3 minutes
L/T = 13464 minutes
VA/T = 11576 minutes
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Step 4 – Number the Process Blocks
• Number the process blocks• Connect the customer and supplier,
process blocks and I.T. systems– “Lightning bolt” arrow for electronic/automatic
information flow– Regular arrow for push systems– “Hollow” arrow for product flow
• If parallel processes exist, use alpha modifiers – e.g. 8A, 8B, etc.
31© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Step 5 – Add Data
• Add key metrics for all process blocks– Process Time (PT)– Lead Time (LT)– Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
• Add work-in-process (WIP) at every step.
32© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Key Metrics: Time
• Process time (PT)– The time it takes to actually perform the work, if one is able to
work on it uninterrupted– Includes task-specific doing, talking, and thinking– aka “touch time,” work time, cycle time
• Lead time (LT)– The elapsed time from the time work is made available until it’s
completed and passed on to the next person or department in the chain
– aka throughput time, turnaround time, elapsed time– Includes Process Time, not merely waiting time.
33© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Key Metrics: TimeScenario 1
34
Lead Time (LT)
Work Received
Work passed to next step
Process Time (PT)
LT = PT + Waiting / Delays
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Key Metrics: TimeScenario 2
35
Work Received
Work passed to next step
Process Time
LT = PT + Waiting / Delays
Lead Time (LT)
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
3 Types of Work-in-Process (WIP)
36
Process 1WIP
WIP
WIP
Step 2’s WIP
Waiting to be
processedCurrentlyin process
Completed, but not yet passed on
Process 2 Process 3
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Current State Value Stream MapPurchasing —Non‐repetitive purchases less than $5,000
Finance
Review Budget
PT = 5 mins.C&A = 60%
6
Corp Purchasing Manager
Approve in ERP
PT = 5 mins.C&A = 90%
1
0.25 days
5 mins.
0.5 days
5 mins.
5 days
5 mins.
1 days
5 mins.
1 days
10 mins.
0.5 days
15 mins.
3 days
5 mins.
7 days
15 mins.
10 days LT = 28.4 days
PT = 65 mins.
AR = 0.477%
Supervisor
Review Req.
PT = 5 mins.C&A = 95%
2
Sys Engineer
Review Requisition
PT = 5 mins.C&A = 90%
1IS Manager
Review Requisition
PT = 5 mins.C&A = 100%
1Financial Mgr
Review Requisition
PT = 10 mins.C&A = 95%
1
Admin Asst
Enter Requisition
PT = 15 mins.C&A = 98%
1
4 hrs. 40 hrs. 8 hrs. 8 hrs. 24 hrs. 56 hrs.
Originator
Inititate Req.
PT = 10 mins.C&A = 10%
31
2 hrs.
Form File
File Maker
ERP
Quicken
Vendor Website
Excel
4 hrs.
Customer Demand:615 requisitions per y ear
20 ReqsExternal Supplier
PT = 20 mins.
Hard CopySupplies
Data Entry
Corp Purchasing
Submit PO to Supplier
PT = 15 mins.C&A = 98%
6
10 Reqs 63 Reqs
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RFPY = 4.2%
PT = Process Time LT = Lead Time C&A = % Complete & Accurate AR = Activ ity Ratio (PT/LT x 100) RFPY = Rolled First Pass Y ield
80 hrs.
WIP only noted at the 3 steps where it has accumulated.
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Key Metrics: Quality
• %Complete and Accurate (%C&A)– % of incoming work that’s “usable as is”; the
downstream customer can perform task without having to “CAC”:
• Correct information or material that was supplied• Add information that should have been supplied• Clarify information that should have or could have been
clearer– Determined by the person receiving the input; metric
goes on the output block.– Measured by the immediate downstream customer
and all subsequent downstream customers.– Similar to first pass yield in manufacturing.
38© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Post‐it Conventions
# Staff (if relevant)
Significant Barriers to flow
Process (Verb/Noun)
Function
%C&AProcess Time
Lead Time
Process #
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Step 6 – Create Timeline
• Create timeline• Calculate summary metrics
– Timeline PT Sum– Timeline LT Sum– % Activity Ratio (AR)– Rolled First Pass Yield (RFPY)
40© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Concurrent Work / Parallel Flows
41
LT = 8 hrs
Process
LT = 4 hrs
Process Process Process
Process
Bring longest lead time to the timeline, unless it’s a “dead end step.”
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Summary Metrics: Time
• Percent Activity (%Act)– Also referred to as Activity Ratio– The percentage of time anything is being done to the
work passing through the system (whether value-adding or non-value-adding)
– %Act = (∑PT ÷ ∑LT) × 100– 100 – %Act = % Time Work is Idle– Common current state finding = 1-10% (across value
stream)– Could also calculate %VA to show proportion of value-
adding time (often significantly lower than % Act).
42© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Summary Metrics: Quality
• Rolled First Pass Yield (RFPY)– The percent of value stream output that passes through
the process “clean,” with no “hiccups,” no rework required.
– RFPY = (%C&A x %C&A x %C&A…) x 100– Example: (0.80 x 0.50 x 0.99 x 0.75) x 100 = 29.7%– Common current state finding = 0-15%
43
Summary Metrics: Labor Requirements
• Total PT– Sum of all activities, not just critical path
• Labor Requirements
44
Total PT (in hrs) X # occurrences/year# FTEsAvailable work hrs/year
=
* FTE = Full‐time Equivalent (2 half time employees = 1 FTE)
Freed Capacity
= Current State FTEs – Future State FTEs
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
What do you do with freed capacity?• If expanding market, absorb add’l work without increasing staff• If flat market, reduce payroll through natural attrition• Reduce paid overtime• In-source• Better work/life balance• Slow down & think• Innovate – create new revenue streams• Conduct ongoing continuous improvement activities• Do a better job with fewer errors and higher safety• Get to know your customers better; build stronger supplier
relationships• Mentor staff to create career growth opportunities• Provide additional workforce development; cross-training• Do the things you haven’t been able to get to; get caught up• Collaborate with other areas
45© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Step 7 – Determine VA & N Steps
• Identify all value-adding (VA) and necessary non-value-adding (N) steps– Add “VA” or “N” smaller post-it to relevant
process blocks– All unnecessary non-value-adding blocks
remain unlabelled
46© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Customer-Defined Value
• Value-Adding (VA) - any operation or activity your external customers value and are (or would be) willing to pay for.
• Non-Value-Adding (NVA) - any operation or activity that consumes time and/or resources but does not add value to the product (good or service) the customer receives.– Necessary – support processes, regulatory
requirements, etc.; also referred to as “essential” or “value-enabling.”
– Unnecessary – everything else - WASTE
47© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Typical Current State Findings
Islands of activity (process times) within long lead times.
48
Value Add
Necessary NVA
Order Delivery
Unnecessary NVA
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Unnecessary non-valueadding
Necessary non-value-adding
Value-adding
Current State Typical Findings:
Work Effort as Defined by the External Customer
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Value Stream Mapping ProcessDefine
Product Family
Design Future State
Document Current State
Implement!
3 Day Event
Foundation (the basis) for the future state; 70‐80% accurate isacceptable (directionally correct)
Create flow by eliminating waste (now obvious from yourcurrent state map); typically 3‐6months out
Products (good or services) withcommon process steps
Repe
at
The goal of mapping!
Create Implementation Plan
Include accountability andtimeframes for completion
Future State Design
• Goal: Eliminate all obstacles to flow (“the thing” should never stop)– Batches– Rework– Bottlenecks & WIP– Handoffs– Setup / changeover– Physical layout– Motion & transportation
51© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Eight Wastes (Muda)
• Overproduction• Inventory• Waiting• Over‐Processing• Errors
• Motion (people)• Transportation (material/data)
• Underutilized people
52© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Eight Questions for Future State VSM
1. What are the customer requirements? What’s the takt time?
2. Will we produce to order or to finished goods inventory? (In office/service sector, you’re almost always producing to order.)
3. Where can continuous flow be put in place?4. Where should pull systems be implemented?5. What is the single point of scheduling?6. How do we level the load and the mix?7. What should the management time frame be?8. What process improvements are necessary to achieve
the future state?‐‐ Rother & Shook, Learning to See
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Future State Design Considerations
• Eliminate steps / handoffs• Combine steps• Create parallel paths• Alter task sequencing and/or
timing• Improve quality (error‐proof)• Eliminate unnecessary
approvals / authorizations• Stop performing non‐value
adding (NVA) tasks• Standardize work• Reduce / eliminate batches
• Implement pull• Create an organized, visual
workplace• Reduce setup &
changeover• Eliminate motion &
transportation• Co‐locate functions based
on flow; create cells (teams of cross‐functional staff)
• Balance work to meet takt time requirements
54© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Future State Value Stream Map Outpatient Imaging Services
Demand = 15 per day
Referring Physician
% C&A = 85 %
Send Reports
(Imaging)
Cycle Time = 3 mins.% C&A = 90 %
6
Hospital
Schedule apptPre-register
Cycle Time = 11 mins.Lead Time = 45 mins.% C&A = 98 %
6
CT=Cycle Time LT=Lead Time %C&A=% Complete & Accurate
0.0833 hrs.
1 mins.
0.583 hrs.
10 mins.
0.333 hrs.
10 mins.
0.0833 hrs.
2 mins.
2 hrs.
15 mins.
7 hrs.
1 mins.
0.0333 hrs.
1 mins.
0.5 hrs.
3 mins.
LT = 11.3 hrs.
CT = 43 mins.CT/LT Ratio = 6.32%
Lead Time = 45 mins.Lead Time = 15 days
PrepPatient(Tech)
Cycle Time = 10 mins.% C&A = 100 %
2
Check-inPatient
(Imaging)
Cycle Time = 1 mins.% C&A = 98 %
3
CompleteExam(Tech)
Cycle Time = 10 mins.% C&A = 90 %
2
TransmitImages(Tech)
Cycle Time = 2 mins.% C&A = 100 %
2
Read/DictateExam
(Radiologist)
Cycle Time = 15 mins.% C&A = 95 %
2
ReviewDraft/Sign
(Radiologist)
Cycle Time = 1 mins.% C&A = 95 %
2
PrintReports
(Imaging)
Cycle Time = 1 mins.% C&A = 99 %
220 mins. 5 mins. 120 mins. 420 mins. 2 mins. 30 mins.35 mins.
E Pay
Excel
Symposium
Internet
Waiting RoomManagement
System
Fax OrderSolutions
PACS
5 mins.
Set-upReduction
Remove Check in
and ReduceSystem Access
Work Balancing
StandardWork
Pull System(Supplies Kanban)
VisualWorkplace
Voice Recognition
Batch Reductions
5S
Co-locate
StandardWork
Work Balance
ContinuousFlow
Value StreamAlignment
Auto Fax 80% Us Mail 15%MD Mailbox 5%
Rolled First Pass yield = 40%
Rework Loop via Fax 10% of the time
Customer Demand:15 patients per Day
(Takt Time 1920 seconds)8 hours per day
123
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Risk Reduction
(Joint Commision)
Meditech
Note: Process Time (PT) is referred to as Cycle Time (CT) on this map
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Value Stream Mapping ProcessDefine
Product Family
Design Future State
Document Current State
Implement!
3 Day Event
Foundation (the basis) for the future state; 70‐80% accurate isacceptable (directionally correct)
Create flow by eliminating waste it is now obvious from yourcurrent state map); typically 3‐6months out
Products (good or services) withcommon process steps
Repe
at
The goal of mapping!
Create Implementation Plan
Include accountability andtimeframes for completion
57
PACE Prioritization Matrix
High LowAnticipated Benefit
Ease
of
Imp
lem
enta
tion
Difficult
Easy
7
5
13
4
23
1
22
8
9
2
10
16
11
6
12
14
19
15
17
3
21
18
24
20
25
26
27
Policy
I.T.
Process
58
Chart Title
Number of Items 54
Item NameOrganizational
Benefit Execution EaseDegree of Urgency*
Item 1 9 1 1Item 2 7 3 2Item 3 5 5 3Item 4 3 7 4Item 5 1 9 5
* Degree of urgency is indicated by bubble size.
The Outstanding Organization: Achieving Focus
Prioritization Chart 1) Enter the title of the chart in Cell B2 2) Enter the number of items (e.g. projects, improvement activities, etc.) in cell B4
3) Enter the item name and ranking information into A8-D8 and so on.
To use this Template:
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Execution Ease
Organizational Benefit
Prioritization Chart
Downloadable Excel Prioritization Chartwww.ksmartin.com/the‐outstanding‐organization
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Value Stream
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
2 Improve quality of referral KE Sean O'Ryan
3, 4 Reduce lead time beween schedulingand preregistration steps PROJ Dianne
Prichard
5, 6 Eliminate the need for two patient check-ins KE Michael
O'Shea
6 Eliminate bottleneck in waiting area KE Dianne Prichard
9 Eliminate lead time associated with transcription step PROJ Sam Parks
10 Eliminate batched reading KE Sam Parks
7 Reduce inventory costs, regulatory risk and storage needs KE Michael
O'Shea
12 Reduce delay in report delivery PROJ Martha Allen
12 Reduce delay in report delivery KE Martha Allen
Implement voice recognition technology
Reduce setup required
Cross-train and colocate work teams
Implement additional fax ports
Collect copays in Imaging
Balance work / level demand
5S CT supplies area; implement kanban
Value Stream Mapping Facilitator
Increase percentage of physicians receiving electronic delivery (rather than hard copy)
Approvals
Executive Sponsor Value Stream Champion
Signature:
Date: Date: Date:
Signature: Signature:
Block# Goal / Objective Improvement Activity
Implement standard work for referral process
Type Owner Implementation Schedule (weeks) Date Complete
Date Created
11/21/2007Allen WardSally McKinseyDave Parks 12/13/200710/18/2007 1/10/2008
Future State Implementation PlanExecutive Sponsor
Value Stream ChampionValue Stream Mapping Facilitator
Implementation Plan Review Dates11/1/2007
Outpatient Imaging
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
60
Where Should We Start?
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
61
What’s the Problem?
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
Which comes first? A3 or VSM?
62
A3
VSM
VSM
A3
“We have a MAJOR
problem.”
“Let’s look at the entire
value stream.”
“We need to improve our entire value stream.”
“Let’s explore this problem in the value stream.”
© Karen Martin & Associates, LLC
e.g., losing market share
e.g., to look at overall product quality and the
reason(s) for long lead times
e.g., new construction
e.g., why plans are so far off in terms of construction logistics
63
Karen Martin, Principal7770 Regents Road #635
San Diego, CA 92122858.677.6799
[email protected]: @karenmartinopex
Subscribe: www.ksmartin.com/subscribe
For Further Questions