GCCSI WebinarROAD project- CO2 Capture plant FEED study

Elvira Huizeling

November 22, 2011

Page 2

Agenda

1. Introduction

2. FEED study scope and boundaries

3. Capture Plant Process & Design

4. HSE

5. CO2 stream, compression

6. Financials and planning

Page 3

1. Introduction

Page 4

ROAD means...

Rotterdam

Opslag

Afvang

Demonstratieproject(Rotterdam Storage and Capture Demonstration)

Page 5

Co-operating Partners ROAD

• Maasvlakte CCS Project C.V. is a joint venture of:• E.ON Benelux

• Electrabel Nederland (GDF SUEZ Group)

• In co-operation with intended partners:• TAQA Energy

• GDF SUEZ E&P

• With financial support of:• European Commission (EU)

• Government of the Netherlands

• Global CCS Institute

Page 6

Objectives ROAD

• Demonstrate feasibility (technical, economic) of large-scale, integrated CCS chain

• Capture and storage of ca. 1.1 Mton CO2 per year in (nearly) depleted gas reservoirs in period of 2015 – 2020

• Acquire knowledge and experience with deployment of large-scale, integrated CCS chain:• Technical• Legal• Economic• Organizational• Social

Page 7

20 meters

Power plant(Maasvlakte)

CO2capture

compression

pipeline 20 km over seabed (North Sea)

pipeline5 km onshore(Maasvlakte)

3,5 km

PlatformP-18A

Not on scale

ROAD CO2 Capture, Transport and Storage Chain

CO2 storage in depleted gasreservoirs

Page 8

MPP3 location Capture Location: Maasvlakte Power Plant 3

Page 9

CO2 Capture Unit

• Technology: post-combustion

• Size: 250 MW equivalent

• Capture rate: 90%

• CO2 capture:

1.1 mln tonne/yr

• Operational: 2015

Page 10

CO2 Transport: 5 km onshore, 20 km offshore

Page 11

CO2 Storage Location

• Depleted gas reservoir P18

• Operator: TAQA

• Depth: 3,500 m

• Capacity: 35 mln tonne

• Available: 2014

• Alternatives / future expansion options

are being investigated (EOR)

Page 12

Other GCCSI reports (soon to be) available

– Capture technology selection methodology

– Permitting process

– Mitigating project risk & handling business risk

– Stakeholder management

– Execution strategy

Page 13

2. FEED study scope and boundaries

Page 14

Boundary of this work

• In this report you can find a short inventarisation on all topics relevant for taking a Final Investment Decision, based on GCCSI know-how

• Work reported here is about Capture Front End Engineering and Design (FEED), not about complete project

• Integration with power plant is included

Page 15

CCS Project Development Framework

Page 16

Base installation

• E.ON Maasvlakte Power Plant 3 (Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

• Output : 1.070 MWe

• Efficiency : 46% (LHV)

• Operational : End 2012

• Capture ready (conform TÜV NORD requirements)

Page 17

17

CCS@MPP3 – Overview Interfaces

Carbon Capture

MPP3

Solvent

Caustic Soda

Flue gas

Instrument air

Flue gas condensate

LP-steam

(steam) condensate

CW supply

Electric power

CW to outletpond

Treated Flue gas

Demin water

Heated condensate

Cold Condensate

Nitrogen

CO2 to storage

Reclaimer waste

Page 18

3. Capture plant process and design

Page 19

19

CCS-MPP3: Process Scheme CC-Plant

Electric

Power

Controls

Drinking water

Fire water

Storm water

Sewage

Page 20

Page 21

Impact of the capture plant on the power plant process, Efficiency in (LHV)

Parameter Unitwithout

Carbon Capture with

Carbon Capture

Electrical Output (Gross) MW 1,117 1,086

Electrical Output (Net) MW 1,069 1,012

Electrical Efficiency (Net) % 46.3 43.9

Specific CO2 emission g/kWh 755 641

Cooling demand Power Plant MW 1,090 985

Cooling demand Carbon CapturePlant

MW 0 161

Overall Cooling demand MW 1,090 1,146

Page 22

22

CCS@MPP3 - Layout

Page 23

Plot plan

STACK

Direct

Contact

Cooler

Blower

Absorber

Stripper

CO2 compressor

Page 24

4. HSE

Page 25

Requested permit values

Component Yearly value

(6% O2)

[mg/Nm3]

Mass flow

[tonnes per

year]

Yearly value

(6% O2)

[mg/Nm3]

Mass flow

[tonnes per

year]

MEA 11 6.2 2.0 6.2

NH31 5.0 2.8 1.0 3.1

NOx as NO2 77.6 44.0 70.0 215.0

SO2 0 0 31 95.0

HCl 3.7 2.1 2.9 9.0

HF 0.5 0.3 0.4 1.3

CxHy 23 13 10 31

Fly ash 2 1.1 3.3 10

CO2 - 18,000 - 687,000

Operational situation:

100% flue gas through CC-Plant

Operational situation:

ca. ¼ flue gas through CC-Plant

EIA: Tabel 3.5: Emission in stack (MPP3 and CC-Plant)

1) NO2

based on

5% of NOx

Page 26

Other streams to consider for permit

• Water• Process water• Cooling water• Demineralized water

• Waste• Other chemicals

• Sodium hydroxide• Solvent • Hydrogen• Nitrogen• Activated Coal

• Noise

Page 27

HAZID

• Hazid was performed in June 2010 and three actions still remained for EPC phase

• First item is already picked up in discussions with authorities

No: Description: By: Due: Response: By: Date:

7

Discussions with authorities need to be opened

to discuss impact of capture plant on operating

permit, with respect to emissions. JV Project EPC

10

Capture plant and MPP3 operators to be trained

regarding emergency response planning. JV operations EPC

20

Ensure all power lines are identified prior to any

excavation or piling work. Construction EPC

Page 28

5. CO2 Stream and compressor

Page 29

CO2 stream specification

• The boundaries of the CO2 specification have been defined

• Purity of CO2 99.9%

• From all elements produced in post combustion capture plant only H2O and O2 are of any relevance.

• Details like the trip values still have to be determined (at which amount of for example H2O and O2 the plant must be stopped?)

• Most important is the temperature and pressure of the stream to determine the phase of the stream

Page 30

Compressor will operate in supercritical areaAssumed operating conditions

for ROAD:

Pressure max 129 bar (a)

T between 40 and 80 °C

Page 31

6. Financials and planning

Page 32

CAPEX for Capture plant of 250 MWe excl. integration

The capital cost estimate breakdown for the capture plant is as follows:

• Equipment: 60 – 70 MM Euro

• Materials and Labor: 65 – 75 MM Euro

• Engineering: 15 – 20 MM Euro

• Indirect Field Costs: 5 – 10 MM Euro

• Owner’s costs (Operator training & first fills): 1 – 2 MM Euro

• Financial and other costs: 25 – 35 MM Euro

• Total: 170 – 210 MM Euro

Page 33

Operating costs capture plant, including steam (Million of Euro, 2010 Euros)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Staff costs 2,1 1,9 1,9 2,0 2,0

Variable costs 18,5 21,1 23,9 24,1 24,3

Maintenance 2,7 2,7 2,7 2,8 2,8

Other costs 1,5 1,5 1,5 1,5 1,5

Total operating costs 24,7 27,2 29,9 30,3 30,7

Power price assumed:

55 €/MWh

Page 34

Construction Schedule

Page 35

Time Path and Milestones

14 July 2009 : EU project proposal submission

September 2009 : Project selection by EU

May 2010 : Grant decision by Government of the Netherlands

September 2010 : Publication starting note Environmental Impact Assessment

Q4 2011 : EIA and permit procedures

2013 : Power plant (MPP3) operational

2015 : Integrated CCS chain operational

2015-2020 : Demonstration phase CCS chain

Page 36

Maasvlakte CCS Project C.V.

Parallelweg 1

3112 NA Schiedam

www.road2020.nl