3 6 1

3 ., ., . . .: -, 2002.

4 . // .. . 2. ., 1971.

5 . // . . . 2. ., 1971.6 . . .

// . 2007. – 3–4 (12).. 17–21; . . -

// . . . . : . 2008. – 23 (54). . 149–155; . .

// . 2007. 4 (17). . 66–77.

7 . .: « -», 1995. . 263.

8 . . ., 1941. . 322.9 . ., . . : . .: , 2000.10 . . 470.11 . . 202.

, ---

XVI

. -, -

-

.

...

( )

,. . . .

– , . .

– , -

( XVI .). -

.: , , , .

The unique artistic form of stone horse-posts was highly developed from the 16th century till the early20th century in the Jinnan area of the Shaanxi Province and the Weibei area in the Shanxi Province. Themost wide-spread type of stone horse-posts is an image of human beings and animals, such as a man ridinga lion or an elephant. These patterns not only carry the information of conquering the nature and fate butalso imply people’s will to make revolutions.

Key words: horse-post, typical, topic, feature, purport.

3 6 2

– -

. -,

. -, -

, -, -

; . -

., -

, ,

.

,

-

.-

, -.

-:

1) -, , , ,

, , . . -, -

;2) ,

. -

- « »: -

, -, . -

, . :

, -, « », -, .

, .

, . -: -

, , « », . ,

, , -, -

. -

, -;

3) ,.

. .

-.-

, .

--

,

: ,

. , , -

, -.

-. -

-, -

. -

-.

,

, -.

, . -

3 6 3

, [1]. -

, , -

, --

( . 1, 2, 3).,

, --

, -

--

, -

, .,-

.

, -, ,

, , . -

– -, , , -

. --

.--

, , -, -

. ,

. -

, . -

, -. , , ,

, --

., -

-,

. --

. --

, . -, -

, , ,

. -

, , , -.

- [3].

,

, -

. 1 . 2 . 3

...

,

. . -

-,-

.

3 6 4

. –

-,

, , , -

.,

, . -,

, -

, -.

-.

. -, « »,

» ( -), « » ( -

), -, .

, , -.

, , --

. -

: ,

.,

.-

, , ,

, . -

-.

-, ,

-, , -

-

-

[2].

, , -

. -

, , -

, . -

, , -

, -.

-

, . -

: -

, ,

( . 4). -, -

-. -

, .

. .

. 4. ,

3 6 5

. --

, , -.

. -

,

. --

, -, .

1 . // -. 1985. 5.

2 . //. 1999. 10.

3 . // -. 1988. 3.

-

« » -, . . -

-, , -

. .

« »

« »

. – , . .

, .

« » , -.

: , , « » , .

As gender is not a casual characteristic of a person, its naming specification becomes important fromthe point of view of feminist linguistics. In this connection it raises doubts about generic reference attributedto masculine gender in German grammar.

Key words: nomination of people, masculine gender, generic reference, feministic linguistics.

, , .

- ( ) ,

-