14
CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

II. DIGNITY -- Facilitate a smooth and easy transfer with respect -- Provide for consumer choice of human versus mechanical assistance whenever possible.

Citation preview

Page 1: CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN

CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

Page 2: CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

  I.     SELF-DETERMINATION

          -- Choice: Consumer, in partnership with staff, has final say, whenever possible, about choice of lifting/moving techniques/strategies.

          -- Independence: Whenever possible, staff should foster consumer independence but provide assistance when needed for safety.

Page 3: CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

II.    DIGNITY

-- Facilitate a smooth and easy transfer with respect

-- Provide for consumer choice of human versus mechanical assistance whenever possible.

Page 4: CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

III.  COMFORT AND SAFETY -- Equipment and policies should be safe

for both the consumer and provider at all times

-- Equipment/techniques should not bruise or hurt consumer physically or psychologically

-- Providers should listen to the consumer. We know best about what works and what doesn’t work.

Page 5: CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

IV. Other KEY CONSIDERATIONS:-- ZERO LIFTING policies ARE THE MOST PROTECTIVE FOR WORKERS BUT LIMIT CONSUMER CHOICE

-- How can we achieve a win-win for BOTH workers and consumers?

-- Inform consumers about lifting options, both manual and mechanical

-- Act in provider-consumer partnership in choice of option

-- Allow provider to refuse only AFTER consumer states preference

-- Create optimal use of multifunctional/modular equipment, minimizing need for multiple transfers. Fewer transfers are best for BOTH consumer and provider.

Page 6: CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

Because people with disabilities vary in disability type, functional ability, shapes and sizes, no one technique or type of equipment will fit all folks. Here are some examples of recommended lifts:

Page 7: CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

TIPS FOR OFFERING ASSISTANCE

Ask if the person needs help with transferring If the offer is accepted, ask the person, “How can I help?” Ask specifically what the person’s preferred choice for transfer is. This may be

•sliding board, •mechanical lift, •transfer team, •independent transfer with slight assistance, •fully independent transfer.

If the offer is declined, respect the dignity of the consumer’s choice.

Page 8: CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

     Hoyer Lift

Page 9: CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

EZ Pivot Lift

Page 10: CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

Ceiling track lift

Page 11: CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

Lift Aid

Page 12: CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

Patient Lift Scale

Page 13: CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

Sliding Board

Page 14: CORE VALUES IN CREATING WIN-WIN CONSUMER/PROVIDER LIFTING POLICIES

RESOURCES

Reis, J.P., Breslin, M.L., Iezzoni, L.I., Kirschner, K.L., “It Takes More Than Ramps,” Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (September 2004), http://www.dredf.org/healthcare/RIC_whitepaperfinal.pdf

Kailes, J.I., MacDonald, C., “Importance of Accessible Examination Tables, Chairs, and Weight Scales,” Center for Disabilities Issues and the Health Professions, http://www.cdihp.org/briefs/1.%20Brief-Exam%20Tables%20and%20Scales-FINAL%20Edition%204_4%208%2009.pdf

American National Standard, “Human Factors Engineering – Design of Medical Devices” (Approved American National Standards Institute 2009), http://www.aami.org/publications/standards/HE75_Ch16_Access_Board.pdf