01b- QL Interpretation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 01b- QL Interpretation

    1/13

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 1

    SchlumbergerPrivate

    Quick-Look Log Interpretation

    E. Standen

    NExT Training

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 2

    SchlumbergerPriv

    ate

    B a s a l Q u a r tz N o . 10 6 / 2 8 / 2 0 0 2 1 0 : 0 2 : 0 6 A M

    D E P T H

    F T

    1 : 5 0 0

    G R ( G A P I)0 . 1 5 0 .

    C A L I ( IN )6 . 1 6 .

    S P (M V )- 2 0 0 . 0 .

    IL D ( O H M M )0 . 2 2 0 0 0 .

    IL M ( O H M M )0 . 2 2 0 0 0 .

    S F L ( O H M M )0 . 2 2 0 0 0 .

    P H ID ( V / V )0 . 4 5 - 0 . 1 5

    P H IN S S ( V / V )0 . 4 5 - 0 . 1 5

    5 4 0 0

    5 5 0 0

    5 6 0 0

    Basal Quartz Example Valley Fill SequenceRmf = 2.6 @ 60F, BHT = 130F

  • 7/31/2019 01b- QL Interpretation

    2/13

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 3

    SchlumbergerPrivate

    Rock Matrix, Porosity & Fluids

    Rt = Rw

    Ro = F Rwwhere

    F = a /m

    Rt = Ro Rt = F Rw / Sw2

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 4

    SchlumbergerPriv

    ate

    Archies Equation

    n

    t

    m

    w

    wR

    RaS

    Watersaturation,

    fractionw

    S

    Resistivity of

    formation water,

    -mwR

    Resistivity of

    uninvaded

    formation, -m

    tR

    Porosity,

    fraction

    Empirical constant

    (usually near unity)

    a

    Saturation

    exponent

    (also usually

    near 2)

    nCementation

    exponent

    (usually near 2)m

  • 7/31/2019 01b- QL Interpretation

    3/13

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 5

    SchlumbergerPrivate

    Resistivity & Lithology - Saturation

    Low Resistivity is a water-wet formation.

    Wet Sands/Carbonates

    Shale

    High Resistivity is a formation with no

    water. Low Porosity no water

    Hydrocarbon present low volume of water (Swirr)

    Or, VERY FRESH water

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 6

    SchlumbergerPriv

    ate

    Clean

    Low Resistivity => Water-Wet

    High Resistivity => HC

    Hydrocarbon Identification from Resistivity and SP.

    or Tight?

    (check)

  • 7/31/2019 01b- QL Interpretation

    4/13

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 7

    SchlumbergerPrivate

    Quick-look HC Identification

    & Flow Unit Analysis Highlight the deep resistivity log.

    Highlight Sonic or Density log as Porosity. Both Sonic and Density read higher in Gas

    In a porous, wet zone (ie. Low Resistivity and

    High Porosity) overlay the porosity on the deep

    resistivity log, keeping the logs parallel and on

    depth.

    Hydrocarbon is indicated where separation occurs

    high resistivity and high porosity.

    If you change the relative position of the porosity

    and resistivity curves it implies a change in Rw.

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 8

    SchlumbergerPriv

    ate

    Trace Density or

    overlay on a light

    table.

    Gamma Ray Neutron Density Porosity Log

  • 7/31/2019 01b- QL Interpretation

    5/13

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 9

    SchlumbergerPrivate

    Overlay

    Logs Here

    Since we are dealing with log-compatible overlay scales, the density curve

    on the resistivity scale now defines Ro, the wet resistivity of the formation.

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 10

    SchlumbergerPriv

    ate

    Water Wet

    HC

    hc

    hc?

    hc?

    Water

    Water Wet

    HC

    HC

    5400

    5500

    5600

    1

  • 7/31/2019 01b- QL Interpretation

    6/13

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 11

    SchlumbergerPrivate

    Sw Calculations

    Get Rw from the SP or Rwa in a 100% wet zone.

    Compute Sw from Deep Resistivity and Density or

    Sonic porosity.

    Or

    Compute Sw from Deep Resistivity and the average of

    Neutron and Density porosity total).

    Do not mix porosities in your computations.

    If shale resistivity is much lower than Rt in the

    hydrocarbon zone, be aware that no correction for the

    shale effect on Rt has been made and you should

    consider a shaly-sand interpretation model. An alternative to individual computations is to plot

    porosity and resistivity on a Picket Plot.

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 12

    SchlumbergerPriv

    ate

    Rwa Method

    Rwa is the apparent water resistivity

    assuming all zones are 100% wet.

    If Sw = 100% then: Rwa = **2 x Rt

    If the zone is 100% wet then Rwa will go to

    a minimum value. If hydrocarbon is present then Rwa > Rw.

    (Rwa will be less than Rw in low porosity zones!)

    In hydrocarbon zones Sw = Rw/Rwa

  • 7/31/2019 01b- QL Interpretation

    7/13

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 13

    SchlumbergerPrivate

    Rwa Computation for BQ ExampleUsing Rild and PhiD (density porosity)

    Basal Quartz No.106/26/2002 5:09:08 PM

    DEPTH

    FT

    1:500

    GR(GAPI)0. 150.

    CALI (IN)6. 16.

    SP(MV)-200. 0.

    ILD(OHMM)0.2 2000.

    ILM(OHMM)0.2 2000.

    SFL (OHMM)0.2 2000.

    Rwa (ohmm)0.002 20.

    PHID(V/V)0.45 -0.15

    PHINSS (V/V)0.45 -0.15

    5400

    Rwa = .025 ohmmNote that where PhiD goes to zero

    Rwa goes lower than Rw.

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 14

    SchlumbergerPriv

    ate

    Pickett Plot ILD vs PhiDBasal Quartz No.1

    ILD / PHIDInterval : 5340. : 5608.

    0.01

    0.02

    0.03

    0.040.050.060.070.080.090.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.40.50.60.70.80.91.

    PH

    ID

    0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000.ILD

    0.

    30.

    60.

    90.

    120.

    150.GR

    446 points plotted out of 537Well Depths

    Basal Quartz No.1 5340.F - 5608.F

    M=2

    Rw = 0.025 ohmm

    Water zonesHydrocarbon

    Zones plot above

    Sw=100% line.

    Sw=100%

  • 7/31/2019 01b- QL Interpretation

    8/13

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 15

    SchlumbergerPrivate

    Simple Shaley-Sand Model

    Irreducible

    water

    Bound water

    Clean Sand Matrix (Quartz) HC

    total = effective

    In a clean sand the irreducible water volume is a function

    of the surface area of the sand grains and therefore, the

    grain size.

    Clean Sand Matrix (Quartz)

    effective

    Clay +

    Silt

    totalIn a shaley-sand the addition of silt + clay usually decreaseseffective porosity due to poorer sorting and increases the

    irreducible water volume with the finer grain size. In

    addition, there is clay bound water that is non-effective

    porosity that adds conductivity to the formation.

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 16

    SchlumbergerPriv

    ate

    Quick-Look Shaley-Sand Analysis

    Sw = 1/ T**2 x Rw/Rt

    total = (PhiN + PhiD)/2

    effective = total x (1 Vsh)

    In a clean formation PhiN = PhiD and Phi-Total is Phie.

    In a shaley formation PhiN + PhiD / 2 usually increases slightlyas shale volume increases (Shale total porosity is usually higher

    than the total porosity of a clean sand until significant

    compaction occurs).

    As shale increases Rt will decrease so the net effect on the

    saturation computation is minimal as shale volume increases.

  • 7/31/2019 01b- QL Interpretation

    9/13

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 17

    SchlumbergerPrivate

    Archies Equation

    n

    t

    m

    w

    w

    R

    RaS

    As Shale (clay) volume increases What is the effect on Sw?

    Up to about 20% Vshale not much effect will be seen on Sw as long

    as the porosity input is Total Porosity, not Effective porosity.

    Total

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 18

    SchlumbergerPriv

    ate

    What is the volume of water in the formation?

    Answer: Sw x = BVW

    Assume basic Archie: Sw**2 = (1/**2) * Rw/Rt

    Sw**2 x **2 = Rw/Rt

    orSw*= Rw/Rt

    Rt is on a logarithmic scale - it is inversely

    proportional to BVW.

    low Rt = high BVW and high Rt = low BVW.

    As long as BVW is changing with porosity you

    are not in the zone of irreducible water saturation.

    Bulk Volume Water

  • 7/31/2019 01b- QL Interpretation

    10/13

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 19

    SchlumbergerPrivate

    Assume ILD = Rt, then BVW is proportional to 1/Rt

    Clean zone

    Low

    Resistivity

    High Resistivity

    Lowest BVW

    Low BVW

    High BVW

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 20

    SchlumbergerPriv

    ate

    = 19%Sw=100%

    Sw=100% = 18%

    = 19%

    = 19%

    = 6 to 15%

    = 12%

  • 7/31/2019 01b- QL Interpretation

    11/13

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 21

    SchlumbergerPrivate

    depth Phi Rt Sw BVW

    5350 0.12 15 0.372678 447

    5374 0.09 25 0.3849 346

    5378 0.13 27 0.25641 333

    5382 0.06 22 0.615457 369

    5392 0.12 28 0.272772 327

    5396 0.18 14 0.257172 463

    5408 0.19 7 0.344555 655

    5420 0.16 1.1 1.032154 1651

    5428 0.15 1.5 0.942809 1414

    5436 0.19 0.8 1.019206 1936

    BVW as Cap. Pressure

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    5350

    5378

    5396

    5420

    depth

    BVW

    BVW

    Water free production

    Ellerslie Example BVW Computation

    We could plot Sw vs. depth as well, but saturation varies more

    with changes in porosity. BVW goes to a minimum when all

    rock types reach Swirr and is therefore, an easier number to

    use for determining water-free production.

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 22

    SchlumbergerPriv

    ate

    BVW related to Cap. Pressure

    Sw

    1000

    Pressure

    OrDepth

    Swirr

    Swirr x Porosity = BVW at

    irreducible saturation

    conditions. This means that

    when BVW approaches a

    low constant value for a

    formation it will produce

    water free above that point.

    Above the Swirr point,

    changes in BVW will

    reflect changes in pore size

    (grain size) or a change in

    HC fluid content.

    Remember that Swirr is

    unique for each rock unit.SwirrLow BVW Hi BVW

  • 7/31/2019 01b- QL Interpretation

    12/13

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 23

    SchlumbergerPrivate

    CapillaryPressure

    from Log

    Data

    B a s a l Q u a r tz N o . 10 2 / 2 5 / 2 0 0 3 3 : 2 2 : 0 7 P M

    D E P T H

    F T

    1 : 5 0 0

    S W ( D e c )0 . 1 .

    P H iT ( v / v )0 . 2 5 0 .

    P H IE ( D e c )0 . 2 5 0 .

    B V W ( D e c )0 . 2 5 0 .

    V W C L ( De c )0 . 1 .

    P H IE ( D e c )1 . 0 .

    V S IL T ( D e c )0 . 1 .

    5 4 0 0

    5 5 0 0

    5 6 0 0

    1

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 24

    SchlumbergerPriv

    ate

    BVW Plot with Permeability K4Buckles Plot

    K= {70* e**2[(1-Swi)/Swi]}**2

    Rock unit 1

    Rock unit 2

    Water zone

    Transition zone

  • 7/31/2019 01b- QL Interpretation

    13/13

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 25

    SchlumbergerPrivate

    BVW Rules of Thumb

    eg. For: Sw=20% & =30%, BVW=600

    For water free production in clean zones

    Carbonates: Oil : BVW= 150 to 400

    Gas: BVW= 50 to 300

    Course-grained Sands: Oil : BVW = 300 to 600

    Gas : BVW = 150 to 300

    Very fine-grained Sands Oil : BVW = 800 to 1200

    Gas : BVW = 600 to 900

    Note: This will depend on the position in the HCcolumn. Higher up gives a lower BVW.

    Copyrght 2003, NExT 26

    SchlumbergerPriv

    ate

    For our Sand Example

    BVWirr ranges from 460 to 330.

    Since we expect light oil & gas production

    from the zone we can estimate that the rock

    should be a coarse-grained sand.

    Zones of higher BVW above the oil-watercontact would indicate finer grain-size rock

    units.

    Log saturations should match core capillary

    pressure data for any given rock type.