23
1 Morality and Religion Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

1

Morality and ReligionMorality and Religion

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Page 2: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

2

OutlineOutline

Introduction: To what extent is religion a basis for morality?

The Divine Command Theory

The Natural Law Theory

Conclusion: Religious beliefs and Morality

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Page 3: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

3

OutlineOutline

Introduction: To what extent is religion a basis for morality?

Introduction: To what extent is religion a basis for morality?

The Divine Command Theory

The Natural Law Theory

Conclusion: Religion and Morality

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Page 4: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

4

IntroductionIntroductionReligion as a foundation of moralityReligion as a foundation of morality

Our problem: Moral truths

1. Are there such things as moral truths?

2. How do we know them and what is their content?

One answer: Religion

1. Yes: God’s law

- As God’s creation, the world is in order – God’s law.

- Human beings and their acts are part of such order.

- Humans beings ought to follow the moral law in their actions.

2. We must find out God’s law! Soazig Le Bihan -- University of

Montana

Page 5: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

5

Introduction: The atheist worldviewIntroduction: The atheist worldviewRussel, A free man’s worshipSuch, in outline, but even more purposeless, more void of meaning, is

the world which Science presents for our belief. Amid such a world, if anywhere, our ideals henceforward must find a home. That man is the product of causes which had no prevision of the end they were achieving; that his origin, his growth, his hopes and fears, his loves and his beliefs, are but the outcome of accidental collocations of atoms; that no fire, no heroism, no intensity of thought and feeling, can preserve an individual life beyond the grave; that all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death of the solar system, and that the whole temple of Man's achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris of a universe in ruins -- all these things, if not quite beyond dispute, are yet so nearly certain, that no philosophy which rejects them can hope to stand. Only within the scaffolding of these truths, only on the firm foundation of unyielding despair, can the soul's habitation henceforth be safely built.

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Page 6: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

6

IntroductionIntroductionMorality and ReligionMorality and Religion

The problem:

- Not all religious people act morally – religion not sufficient for moral behavior

- Not all non-religious people act immorally – religion not necessary

The relationships between morality and religion are more complex than expected

The relationships between morality and religion are more complex than expected

Our question: to what extent can religion be a foundation for morality?

Our question: to what extent can religion be a foundation for morality?

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Page 7: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

7

OutlineOutline

Introduction

The Divine Command TheoryThe Divine Command Theory

The Natural Law Theory

Conclusion: Religion and Morality

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Page 8: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

8

The Divine Command Theory The Divine Command Theory

The Divine Command Theory (DCT):

The Divine Command Theory is the view on morality that what is right is whatever God commands.

This gives answers to our questions:

1. Are there such things as moral truths?

Yes, God’s law

2. How do we know them and what is their content?

We know them through religion, and their content are whatever our religion says it is.

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Page 9: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

9

The Problem with the DCT: The Problem with the DCT: Socrates’ questionSocrates’ question

Socrates’ question about the definition of “what is pious”:

Euthyphro: what is pious is whatever is loved by the gods

Socrates: is it pious because it is loved by the gods or is it loved by the gods because it is pious?

Socrates’ answer: it is loved by the gods because it is pious – not the other way – and

Euthyphro failed to define what it is to be pious.

Socrates’ answer: it is loved by the gods because it is pious – not the other way – and

Euthyphro failed to define what it is to be pious.

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Page 10: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

10

The Problem with the DCT: The Problem with the DCT: Understanding Socrates’ questionUnderstanding Socrates’ question

Socrates’ question about the definition of “what is a great hike”:

Euthyphro: what is a great hike is whatever is loved by the Montanans.

Socrates: is it a great hike because it is loved by the Montanans or is it loved by the Montanans because it is a great hike?

Socrates’ answer: it is loved by the Montanans because it is a great hike– not the other way – and Euthyphro failed to define what it is to

be a great hike.

Socrates’ answer: it is loved by the Montanans because it is a great hike– not the other way – and Euthyphro failed to define what it is to

be a great hike. Soazig Le Bihan -- University of

Montana

Page 11: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

11

The Problem with the DCT: The Problem with the DCT: Socrates’ question applied to the DCTSocrates’ question applied to the DCT

Socrates’ question about the definition of “what is right”:

Euthyphro: what is right is whatever is whatever God commands

Socrates: is it right because God commands it or does God command it because it is right?

Socrates’ answer: it is commanded by God because it is right – not the other way – and Euthyphro failed to define what it is to be

right.

Socrates’ answer: it is commanded by God because it is right – not the other way – and Euthyphro failed to define what it is to be

right.

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Page 12: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

12

The Problem with the DCT: The Problem with the DCT: One last exampleOne last example

Socrates’ question about the definition of “what is good for your education”:

Euthyphro: what is good for your education is whatever is whatever your parents command

Socrates: is it good for your education because your parents command it or do your parents command it because it is good for your education ?

Socrates’ answer: it is commanded by your parents because it is good for your education – not the other way – and

Euthyphro failed to define what it is to be good for your education .

Socrates’ answer: it is commanded by your parents because it is good for your education – not the other way – and

Euthyphro failed to define what it is to be good for your education .Soazig Le Bihan -- University of

Montana

Page 13: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

13

The Divine Command Theory:The Divine Command Theory:Two interpretationsTwo interpretations

Interpretation 1:

Something is right because God commands it

Interpretation 2:

God commands something because it is right

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Interpretation 1:

Good for your education because your parents

command it

Interpretation 2:

Commanded by your parents because good for your

education

Mere AuthorityMere Authority Knowledgeable guideKnowledgeable guide

Page 14: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

14

The Divine Command Theory:The Divine Command Theory:Interpretation 1 – Pros and ConsInterpretation 1 – Pros and Cons

Interpretation 1:

Something is right because God commands it

PROS:

- There are moral truths

- These truths are easy to find: Follow the Scriptures as an absolute authority

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

CONS:

- Moral truths are arbitrary

- How to understand the Scriptures when ambiguous or outdated?

Page 15: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

15

The Divine Command Theory:The Divine Command Theory:Interpretation 2 – Pros and ConsInterpretation 2 – Pros and Cons

Interpretation 2:

God commands something because it is right

PROS:

- There are moral truths

- These truths are not arbitrary

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

CONS:

Moral truths exist independently of religion / God

We need another foundation!

Page 16: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

16

The Divine Command Theory The Divine Command Theory ConclusionConclusion

The Divine Command Theory:The Divine Command Theory is the view on

morality that what is right is whatever God commands.

Socrates’ question: Is it right because God’s commands it or does

God command it because it is rightTwo interpretations: 1. Right because God commands itProblem: Arbitrariness of moral truths2. Commanded by God because it is rightProblem: need for another foundation

The Divine Command Theory:The Divine Command Theory is the view on

morality that what is right is whatever God commands.

Socrates’ question: Is it right because God’s commands it or does

God command it because it is rightTwo interpretations: 1. Right because God commands itProblem: Arbitrariness of moral truths2. Commanded by God because it is rightProblem: need for another foundationSoazig Le Bihan -- University of

Montana

Page 17: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

17

OutlineOutline

Introduction

The Divine Command Theory

The Natural Law TheoryThe Natural Law Theory

Conclusion: Religion and Morality

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Page 18: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

18

The Natural Law TheoryThe Natural Law TheoryThe Natural Law and the CosmosThe Natural Law and the Cosmos

The idea of the cosmos:

- Cosmos: the world in rational order – natural law

- Humans: gifted with reason to understand the law

- Morality: understand and follow the natural law

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Aquinas: Reason = “the imprint of divine light” on us

Aquinas: Reason = “the imprint of divine light” on us

The Natural Law Theory

The Natural Law Theory is the view that what is right is governed by the natural law, which reflects the rational order of the world.

Page 19: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

19

The Natural Law TheoryThe Natural Law TheoryMorality and UsMorality and Us

Humans vs. Animals

- Only humans can follow the law voluntarily – will

- Only humans can understand the law – reason

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Believers vs Non-believers

All humans can understand and follow the law, believers or not, because all humans possess reason and will

To what extend is religion a foundation of moral truths?

- The rational order is the ultimate foundation

- But Religion gives us the assurance that the world is in a rational order

Page 20: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

20

The Natural Law TheoryThe Natural Law TheoryMoral TruthsMoral Truths

How can we understand the law?

- Same as mathematics (Euclid)

- Rational intuition + logical reasoning

What does the law provide us?

- General guiding principles for our motives/intentions

- NOT specific acts for particular circumstances

- Ex: “good entrusted to another should be restored to their owner”

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Page 21: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

21

The Natural Law Theory The Natural Law Theory ConclusionConclusion

The Natural Law Theory: what is right is governed by the natural law, which reflects the rational order of the world.Common aspects between the NLT and the DCT - There are moral truths- We can know themDifference between the NLT and the DCT:- Use of reason necessary - All humans - Only guidelines – not particular casesThe NLT: what does religion give us? Rational order of the world

The Natural Law Theory: what is right is governed by the natural law, which reflects the rational order of the world.Common aspects between the NLT and the DCT - There are moral truths- We can know themDifference between the NLT and the DCT:- Use of reason necessary - All humans - Only guidelines – not particular casesThe NLT: what does religion give us? Rational order of the worldSoazig Le Bihan -- University of

Montana

Page 22: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

22

OutlineOutline

Introduction: Is religion a necessary basis for morality?

The Divine Command Theory: 2 interpretations

The Natural Law Theory

Conclusion: Religion and MoralityConclusion: Religion and Morality

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Page 23: 1 Morality and Religion Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

23

Morality and ReligionMorality and Religion

Soazig Le Bihan -- University of Montana

Our problem: Moral truths1. Are there such things as moral truths? 2. How do we know them and what is their

content? An answer: Religion But how?1. Divine Command Theory: - Socrates’ question: two interpretations- Interpretation 1: moral truths arbitrary- Interpretation 2: need for another foundation2. Natural Law Theory- Reason as the ultimate foundation of moral

truths- Religion as the guarantee of the rational order

of the world

Our problem: Moral truths1. Are there such things as moral truths? 2. How do we know them and what is their

content? An answer: Religion But how?1. Divine Command Theory: - Socrates’ question: two interpretations- Interpretation 1: moral truths arbitrary- Interpretation 2: need for another foundation2. Natural Law Theory- Reason as the ultimate foundation of moral

truths- Religion as the guarantee of the rational order

of the world