Achievement Level of Pre-Secondary School Students of Working Mothers and Non-Working Mothers

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS BETWEEN PRE-SERVICE AND IN-SERVICE TEACHERS DISSERTATION

M.Ed.

SUPERVISOR

CANDIDATE

DR. ROLI RAI

NEHA TEWARI

Assistant Professor

Enrollment No.

Department of Education

1000101497

2010-2011

Department of Education,

Integral University

Lucknow.OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY1. To Compare The Level Of Environmental Awareness Among Teacher trainees with regard to gender.2. To compare the level of environmental awareness among in-service teacher trainees with regard to gender.3. To compare the level of environmental awareness among teacher trainees with regard to their subject stream (science/Humanities).4. To compare the level of environment awareness among teacher trainees of government and private college.5. To compare the level of environmental awareness with regard to there urban and rural background pre-service and in-service teacher.HYPOTHESIS :1. Pre service teacher trainees and in service teacher trainees do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness. 2. Pre service Science teacher trainees and in service science teacher trainees do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness.

3. Pre service humanities teacher trainees and In service humanities teacher trainees do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness.

4. Pre service male teacher trainees and in service male teacher trainees do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness.

5. Pre service female teacher trainees and in service female teacher trainees do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness.

6. Pre service teacher traines of Government college and in service teacher trainees of government college do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness.7. Pre service teacher trainees of private college and in service teacher trainees of private college do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness.

8. Pre service teacher trainees of urban background and in service teacher trainees of urban background do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness.

9. pre service teacher trainees of rural background and in service teacher trainees of rural background do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness.CHAPTER 4Analysis and Interpretation

4.1 INTRODUCTION-

The present chapter presents the analysis of data, results sand their interpretation. Each section is followed by a brief discussion of the results obtained.

Analysis of data means to make the raw data meaningful or to draw some result form the data after the proper treatment. The null hypothesis are tested with the help of analysis of data so as to obtain some significant result. Thus the analysis of data serves the following main functions-

(i) To make the raw data meaningful

(ii) To test null hypothesis

(iii) To obtain significant results

(iv) To draw some inference or make generalization

(v) To estimate parameters

After analyzing the data, the next step is to interpret the results. The process of interpretation is essential on the stating what the results or findings show? What do they mean? What is the answer to the original problem?

Interpretation calls for a critical examination of the result of one's analysis in the light of all the limitations of his data gathering and his subjective attitude which should be avoided. One must be critical of one's own thinking.

In the present study, the analysis and interpretation of data were done in the following way-

TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS NO. 1

pre-service teacher trainees and in service teacher trainees do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness.

For testing above hypothesis mean and standard deviation of the scores of these sub-groups were computed.

difference of level of environmental awareness among to in service teacher and pre servive teacher

Types of teachersNMeanS.D. t

(DF) (298)Significant

Pre service15052.71

13.170.52Not significant

In service15053.4812.17

0.05& 0.01 significant level

The mean of level of environmental awareness of pre service teacher trainees and in service teacher trainees are 52.71 and 53.48 respectively. Their S.D. value is 13.17 and 12.17 respectively.

With the help of these SD. And mean value, critical ratio (t) is calculated, it is 0.52, it is not significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level of significance so null hypothesis 1 is accepted.

This shows that there is non significant difference of level of environmental awareness of pre service teacher trainees and in service teacher trainees TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS NO. 2

Pre service Science teacher trainees and in service science teacher trainees do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness.

For testing above hypothesis mean and standard deviation of the scores of these sub-groups were computed.

difference of level of environmental awareness among to Pre service Science teacher trainees and in service science teacher traineesTypes of teachers

NMeanS.D. t

(DF) (114)Significant

Pre service science4856.08

15.891.06Not significant

Inservice science6852.9615.1

0.05& 0.01 significant level

The mean of level of environmental awareness of Pre service Science teacher trainees and in service science teacher trainees are 56.08 and 52.96 respectively. Their S.D. value is 15.89 and 15.1 respectively.

With the help of these SD. And mean value, critical ratio (t) is calculated, it is 1.06, it is not significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level of significance so null hypothesis 2 is accepted.

This shows that there is non significant difference of level of environmental awareness of Pre service Science teacher trainees and in service science teacher trainees. TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS NO. 3Pre service humanities teacher trainees and In service humanities teacher trainees do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness.

.

.For testing above hypothesis mean and standard deviation of the scores of these sub-groups were computed.

difference of level of environmental awareness among to pre service humanities teacher trainees and in service humanities teacher traineesTypes of teachers

NMeanS.D. t

(DF) (182)Significant

Pre service humanities10250.46

11.462.27 significant

In service humanities 8253.919.16

0.05& 0.01 significant level

The mean of level of environmental awareness of Pre service humanities teacher trainees and In service humanities teacher trainees are 50.46 and 53.91 respectively. Their S.D. value is 11.46 and 9.16 respectively.

With the help of these SD. And mean value, critical ratio (t) is calculated, it is 2.27, it is significant at 0.05 level of significance so null hypothesis 3 is rejected.

This shows that there is significant difference of level of environmental awareness of Pre service humanities teacher trainees and In service humanities teacher trainees. TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS NO. 4Pre service male teacher trainees and in service male teacher trainees do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness.

For testing above hypothesis mean and standard deviation of the scores of these sub-groups were computed.

difference of level of environmental awareness among to Pre service male teacher trainees and in service male teacher traineesTypes of teachers

NMeanS.D. t

(DF) (144)Significant

Pre service male teacher7251.18

13.840.68Not significant

In service male teacher7452.5810.87

0.05& 0.01 significant level

The mean of level of environmental awareness of Pre service male teacher trainees and in service male teacher trainees are 51.18 and 52.58 respectively. Their S.D. value is 13.84and 10.87 respectively.

With the help of these SD. And mean value, critical ratio (t) is calculated, it is 0.68, it is not significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level of significance so null hypothesis 4 is accepted.

This shows that there is non significant difference of level of environmental awareness of Pre service male teacher trainees and in service male teacher trainees. TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS NO. 5Pre service female teacher trainees and in service female teacher trainees do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness.

For testing above hypothesis mean and standard deviation of the scores of these sub-groups were computed.

difference of level of environmental awareness among to pre service female teacher trainees and in service female teacher traineesTypes of teachers

NMeanS.D. t

(DF) (152)Significant

Pre service female teacher7851.13

12.441.55Not significant

In service female teacher7654.3613.34

The mean of level of environmental awareness of Pre service female teacher trainees and in service female teacher trainees are 51.13 and 54.36 respectively. Their S.D. value is 12.44 and 13.34 respectively.

With the help of these SD. And mean value, critical ratio (t) is calculated, it is 1.55, it is not significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level of significance so null hypothesis 5 is accepted.

This shows that there is non significant difference of level of environmental awareness of Pre service female teacher trainees and in service female teacher trainees . TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS NO. 6Pre service teacher traines of Government college and in service teacher trainees of government college do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness.For testing above hypothesis mean and standard deviation of the scores of these sub-groups were computed.

difference of level of environmental awareness among to Pre service government college teacher trainees and in service government college teacher traineesTypes of teachers

NMeanS.D. t

(DF) (142)Significant

Pre service teacher of govt. college 7051.45

13.760.57Not significant

In service teacher of govt. college7452.6411.10

0.05& 0.01 significant level

The mean of level of environmental awareness of Pre service teacher traines of Government college and in service teacher trainees of government college are 51.45 and 52.64 respectively. Their S.D. value is 13.76 and 11.10 respectively.

With the help of these SD. And mean value, critical ratio (t) is calculated, it is 0.57, it is not significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level of significance so null hypothesis 6 is accepted.

This shows that there is non significant difference of level of environmental awareness of Pre service teacher traines of Government college and in service teacher trainees of government college . TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS NO. 7pre service teacher trainees of private college and in service teacher trainees of private college do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness.

For testing above hypothesis mean and standard deviation of the scores of these sub-groups were computed.

difference of level of environmental awareness among to pre service private college teacher trainees and in service private college teacher traineesTypes of teachers

NMeanS.D. t

(DF) (154)Significant

Pre service teacher of pvt. college 7653.93

12.540.14Not significant

In service teacher of pvt. college8054.2413.07

0.05& 0.01 significant level

The mean of level of environmental awareness of pre service teacher trainees of private college and in service teacher trainees of private college are 53.93 and 54.24 respectively. Their S.D. value is 12.54 and 13.07 respectively.

With the help of these SD. And mean value, critical ratio (t) is calculated, it is 0.14, it is not significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level of significance so null hypothesis 7 is accepted.

This shows that there is non significant difference of level of environmental awareness of pre service teacher trainees of private college and in service teacher trainees of private college TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS NO. 8Pre service teacher trainees of urban background and in service teacher trainees of urban background do not differ significantly in their level of environmental awareness.

For testing above hypothesis mean and standard deviation of the scores of these sub-groups were computed.

difference of level of environmental awareness among to Pre service teacher trainees of urban backgrounds and in service teacher trainees of urban backgroundTypes of teachers

NMeanS.D. t

(DF) (121)Significant

Pre service teacher of urban background 4854.96

15.250.93Not significant

In service teacher of urban background7552.414.48

0.05& 0.01 significant levelThe mean of level of environmental awareness of Pre service teacher trainees of urban background and in service teacher trainees of urban background are 54.96 and 52.4 respectively. Their S.D. value is 15.25 and 14.48 respectively.

With the help of these SD. And mean value, critical ratio (t) is calculated, it is 0.93, it is not significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level of significance so null hypothesis 8 is accepted.

This shows that there is non significant difference of level of environmental awareness of Pre service teacher trainees of urban background and in service teacher trainees of urban background. TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS NO. 9For testing above hypothesis mean and standard deviation of the scores of these sub-groups were computed.

difference of level of environmental awareness among to pre service teacher trainees of rural backgrounds and in service teacher trainees of rural background Types of teachers

NMeanS.D. t

(DF) (175)Significant

Pre service teacher of rural background 10251.66

12.011.81Not significant

In service teacher of rural background7554.569.31

0.05& 0.01 significant levelThe mean of level of environmental awareness of Pre service teacher trainees of rural background and in service teacher trainees of rural background are 51.66 and 54.56 respectively. Their S.D. value is 12.01 and 9.31 respectively.

With the help of these SD. And mean value, critical ratio (t) is calculated, it is 1.81, it is not significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level of significance so null hypothesis 9 is accepted.

This shows that there is non significant difference of level of environmental awarenesss of Pre service teacher trainees of rural background and in service teacher trainees of rural background.