Upload
oscar2302
View
18
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Rock mechanics Flaws
Citation preview
1
Stope Back DesignCase History
• Wedge failure problems had beenencountered in the past.
• Increased cable bolting was applied toimprove stability
Back/HW Support?
2
Rock Mass Properties
‐ 3 joint sets were present
‐ Joint set A was at a 30 degree dip
‐ Rock UCS = 100 MPa
‐ Induced stress = 50 MPa
‐ Joint set A: JRC10 = 14 1m Amp = .7cm
‐ Joint surfaces cannot be scratched with a fingernail
‐ RQD = 100%
Factor AStrength/stress
Uniaxial Compressive Strength, UCSMax. Induced Compressive Stress, max.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Ratio:
Roc
k S
tres
s fa
cto r
A
Max.
Stope Face
Obtain max. from 2D or 3Dnumerical stress modelling
3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Ture Angle Between Face and Joint(Angle Between Poles)
Join
t Orie
nta t
ion
Fac
tor
B
Factor B
True Angle Between Face and Joint
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900
2
4
6
8
10
Dip of Stope Face
Gra
vity
Adj
ustm
e nt F
acto
r, C
C=8-6cos(Dip)
Factor CGravty Fall &Slabbing
Face Dip
Sto
pe
4
Stope Geometry
• Stope is 14m wide by approx. 53m long.
• Cable bolting was done with 3 passes
• Design a stable cable support
5
Design Parameters
• Jr = 1.5 3 joint sets & 100% RQD
• Ja = 1.0
• Q’ = 17
• A = 0.1 B = .2 C = 2.0
• N’ = 0.8
• H.R. = 5.5m
6
100/9/5.5=2
RQD/Jn/HR = 2.0
7
Sp
an (
m)
Pote
ntia
l U
nsta
ble
Zon
e
Stable Zone
RMR
Unstable Zone
45
40
35
30
Unstable Potential Stable
20
10
15
0
5
Stable
25
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Span Design (Wang et al., 2000)
2 Months Later
8
9