10 Things Which Do Not Change With EHR Implementation
EHR or Electronic Health Record is a credible addition to the health IT sector. The increasing
number of afflictions and patients required the implementation of information technology for
storing and maintaining patient data. On one hand, we look at a future in which medical data is
completely integrated with the IT domain and on the other we are at risk of exposing valuable
medical data of individuals to the nascent threats of IT world.
EHR implementation is not anyones cup of tea to be executed without any major complications.
The various issues which arise in the internal and external environments of the medical
organization such as in compliance of employees and improper data acquisition from patients
are massive setbacks in EHR implementation. Primary adoption of EHR model on the part of
physicians is also another concern. Improper implementation of EHR models can result in user
dissatisfaction and haphazard patient and physician workflow integration.
Successful EHR implementation, on the other hand, invites better consequences by facilitating
ample opportunities to capitalize on available resources. The broad database generated from
EHR implementation makes healthcare a cakewalk for physicians. Furthermore, it also offers
tools for preparing against imminent maladies.
Some of the entities tend to remain constant despite EHR implementation.
Let us discuss some of the facets of EHR implementation to achieve a lucid impression of such
1. Workflow support maintains a formidable stance during and after EHR implementation.
The EHR platform aids in core workflows. However, the various scenarios in which EHR is
implemented describe a consistent workflow behavior.
2. Interactions between patients and physicians do not get hampered by improvised
healthcare facilities accompanying EHR implementation.
3. The proportion of difficulty on the part of physicians remains undisturbed owing to the
complexity of EHR.
4. The costs associated with healthcare do not wane on EHR implementation.
Follow us: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Google+ | YouTube
5. Training sessions can be considered as a constant even after a successful EHR
implementation. Physicians and concerned support staff have to be motivated
consistently regarding the use of EHR systems and features. Removal of training sessions
from the organizations schedule could put the organization at risk of losing patient data
or incidents of misappropriation.
6. Even the most sophisticated EHR technologies cannot assure privacy to patients. This can
be considered as another constant after EHR implementation since any system would
require the acquisition of data from patients and this data can be accessed by many
others. This puts the patients privacy in jeopardy despite no malicious intent on the part
of the operators.
7. The organization does not have to revise any of its policies or operating strategies owing
to EHR implementation.
8. The factors associated with the EHR implementation procedure such as planning and risk
evaluation do not alter. These factors need to be planned meticulously, and adept
assessment of these phases facilitates higher productivity in EHR implementation.
9. The consistent threat of security breaches does not fade away after incorporating an EHR
10. Last but not the least, the scrutiny of individuals accessing the EHR continues after
implementation to ensure data security.