Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 26 JUNE 2019
11.2 Sustainable Development Attachments ITEM NO SUBJECT PAGE 11.2.1 SCHEME AMENDMENT 62 FOR INITIATION – RECEPTION CENTRE 1 11.2.2 SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16 MAY 2019 121
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 26 JUNE 2019
11.2 Sustainable Development 11.2.1 SCHEME AMENDMENT 62 FOR INITIATION –
RECEPTION CENTRE
Attachment 1 – Scheme Amendment Proposal
1
rpsgroup.com.au
Scheme Amendment Report Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
Prepared by:
RPS AUSTRALIA EAST PTY LTD
PO Box 170 West Perth 6872
T: +61 8 9754 2898 F: +61 8 9754 2085 E: [email protected] Client Manager: Lachlan McCaffrey Report Number: PR140773-1 Version / Date: January 2019
Prepared for:
AGEFAME PTY LTD
C/- Gilgara Retreat 3 Old Ellenbrook Road, Margaret River
T: (08) 9757 2707 E: [email protected]
2
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page ii Page ii
IMPORTANT NOTE
Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this report, its attachments or appendices may be reproduced by any process without the written consent of RPS Australia East Pty Ltd. All enquiries should be directed to RPS Australia East Pty Ltd.
We have prepared this report for the sole purposes Agefame Pty Ltd (“Client”) for the specific purpose of only for which it is supplied (“Purpose”). This report is strictly limited to the purpose and the facts and matters stated in it and do not apply directly or indirectly and will not be used for any other application, purpose, use or matter.
In preparing this report we have made certain assumptions. We have assumed that all information and documents provided to us by the Client or as a result of a specific request or enquiry were complete, accurate and up-to-date. Where we have obtained information from a government register or database, we have assumed that the information is accurate. Where an assumption has been made, we have not made any independent investigations with respect to the matters the subject of that assumption. We are not aware of any reason why any of the assumptions are incorrect.
This report is presented without the assumption of a duty of care to any other person (other than the Client) (“Third Party”). The report may not contain sufficient information for the purposes of a Third Party or for other uses. Without the prior written consent of RPS Australia East Pty Ltd:
(a) this report may not be relied on by a Third Party; and
(b) RPS Australia East Pty Ltd will not be liable to a Third Party for any loss, damage, liability or claim arising out of or incidental to a Third Party publishing, using or relying on the facts, content, opinions or subject matter contained in this report.
If a Third Party uses or relies on the facts, content, opinions or subject matter contained in this report with or without the consent of RPS Australia East Pty Ltd, RPS Australia East Pty Ltd disclaims all risk and the Third Party assumes all risk and releases and indemnifies and agrees to keep indemnified RPS Australia East Pty Ltd from any loss, damage, claim or liability arising directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance on this report.
In this note, a reference to loss and damage includes past and prospective economic loss, loss of profits, damage to property, injury to any person (including death) costs and expenses incurred in taking measures to prevent, mitigate or rectify any harm, loss of opportunity, legal costs, compensation, interest and any other direct, indirect, consequential or financial or other loss.
Document Status
Version Purpose of Document Orig Review Review Date V1 Draft Report L.McCaffrey L.McCaffrey 5 February, 2019
V2 Final Report L.McCaffrey L.McCaffrey 11 February, 2019
Approval for Issue
Name Signature Date
Lachlan McCaffrey
11 February, 2019
3
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page iii Page iii
Planning and Development Act 2005
RESOLUTION TO ADOPT AMENDMENT TO LOCAL PLANNING SCHEME
Shire of Augusta-Margaret River
Town Planning Scheme No. 1
Amendment No. ‘X’ RESOLVED that the Council, in pursuance of section 75 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, amend the above Town Planning Scheme by:
1. Rezoning Lot 5 Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown to incorporate a ‘Reception Centre’ as an ‘Additional Use’ under Schedule 2 of Town Planning Scheme No. 1
2. Amend the Scheme Map to reflect the ‘Additional Use’.
The Amendment is standard under the provisions of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Scheme) Regulations 2015 for the following reasons:
1. The amendment is generally consistent with the planning objectives established by State Planning Policy 6.1 Leeuwin-Naturaliste Ridge and Local Planning Strategy.
2. The amendment will not result in any adverse impact to the rural amenity of the locality.
Dated this…………..……………………day of…….…….……….……………………20……
….…………………………………………
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
4
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page iv Page iv
Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SUBJECT LAND ...................................................................................................................................... 2
2.1 Property Description and Location ............................................................................................ 2
2.2 Existing Land Use and Development ......................................................................................... 2
2.3 Regional and Local Context ........................................................................................................ 3
2.3.1 Site context and proposed development ........................................................................ 3
2.4 Contaminated Sites ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.5 Acid Sulfate Soils ......................................................................................................................... 5
2.6 Bushfire Risk ................................................................................................................................ 5
2.7 Pre-Lodgement Consultation ...................................................................................................... 5
3.0 STATE AND LOCAL PLANNING FRAMEWORK .................................................................................. 7
3.1 State Planning Framework .......................................................................................................... 7
3.1.1 State Planning Policy 6.1: Leeuwin-Naturaliste Ridge Policy ......................................... 7 3.1.2 Draft Leeuwin Naturaliste Sub-regional Planning Strategy ............................................ 8
3.1.3 State Planning Policy 3.7 Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas ......................................... 8
3.2 Local Planning Framework ......................................................................................................... 9
3.2.1 Shire of Augusta-Margaret River Local Planning Scheme No. 1 ................................... 9
3.2.2 Shire of Augusta-Margaret River Local Planning Strategy ........... Error! Bookmark not defined.
3.2.3 Shire of Augusta-Margaret River Local Tourism Planning Strategy ............................. 12
3.2.4 Local Planning Policies ................................................................................................. 14
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ..................................................................................................... 15
4.1 Noise Assessment ..................................................................................................................... 15
4.2 Bushfire Management Plan ....................................................................................................... 17 4.3 Bushfire Evacuation (Response) Plan ..................................................................................... 17
5.0 SITE DETAILS ....................................................................................................................................... 18
5.2 Development Controls ............................................................................................................... 19
6.0 PROPOSED SCHEME AMENDMENT .................................................................................................. 20
7.0 CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................................................... 24
5
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page v Page v
Figures Figure 1 Aerial Site Plan ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2 Context Plan ......................................................................................................................................... 4
Figure 3 Existing Town Planning Scheme Zoning .............................................................................................. 9
Figure 4 Noise Assessment – Outdoor Wedding Ceremony ............................................................................ 15
Figure 5 Noise Assessment – Outdoor Wedding Reception ............................................................................ 16
Figure 6 Reception Centre layout ..................................................................................................................... 18
Appendices Appendix A ............................................................................................................................ Certificates of Title
Appendix B ........................................................................................................................... Noise Assessment
Appendix C ............................................................................................................. Bushfire Managament Plan
Appendix D ............................................................................................ Bushfire Evacuation (Response) Plan
Appendix E ........................................................................................................................ In-principle Approval
6
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 1 Page 1
1.0 Introduction RPS acts on behalf of the landowners of Lot 5 Old Ellen Brook Road (the subject site). The subject site is located in the Shire of Augusta-Margaret River, in the suburb of Gracetown approximately 5.9km from the Margaret River townsite and approximately 0.8km to the east of Leeuwin-Naturaliste National Park. The site is bounded to the north by Old Ellen Brook Road, to the east and south-east by Caves Road and west by a rural land use designated within the Leeuwin-Naturaliste Ridge Landscape Amenity zone.
The current ‘Chalet and Camping’ zoning of the site currently does not permit the operation of the ‘Reception Centre’ on the subject site, being an ‘X’ use. This Scheme Amendment therefore seeks to amend the Town Planning Scheme No. 1 (the Scheme) to incorporate a ‘Reception Centre’ as an ‘Additional Use’ under Schedule 2 of the Scheme over the subject site. This will allow for the supporting operation of a reception centre to the existing use, which will contribute to the overall diversity of tourism experiences in the locality and providing economic prosperity and viability of enterprise.
The subject site contains chalet buildings and a homestead which currently operates as a short stay chalet accommodation.
The landowner received correspondence from the Shire on 1 November 2017 advising of a potential breach under the Scheme, for the use of a ‘Reception Centre’ without development approval. The basis of this breach was due to the former venue managers conducting weddings on the site for up to 80 guests outside of the approved function centre and operating amplified music until midnight.
Subsequently an In-principle Scheme Amendment application was lodged with the Shire on 7 July 2018. On 12 December 2018 following detailed review of the proposal, the Shire provided formal advice advising that they would support a future application to initiate an amendment to rezone the subject site. The In-principle Approval is attached in Appendix E.
The following consultants have been involved with the preparation of the various technical reports and studies that underpin the Scheme Amendment report:
RPS Australia East – Town Planning
Lloyd George Acoustic – Noise Management
Bushfire Prone Planning – Bushfire Management and Evacuation Plan
7
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 2 Page 2
2.0 Subject Land
2.1 Property Description and Location
The subject land is described as Lot 5 Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River. Current Certificate of Title and ownership details for the subject sites are described in the table below.
Table 1 Certificate of Title Details
Street No. Street Lot No. Plan /
Diagram CT
Volume CT
Folio Area Current Owner
3 Old Ellen Brook Road 5 DP69426 1977 968 9.1196ha Agefame Pty Ltd
2.2 Existing Land Use and Development
The existing land uses on the subject lots are as follows:
• ‘Tourist Accommodation Facility’
Existing development over the subject site includes:
• ‘Gilgara Retreat’ homestead, which includes ‘Lodge’ and ‘Barn’ rooms;
• Four detached chalet buildings – total of 8 chalets; and
• Rainwater tanks.
As part of the historic planning approval dates August 2007, a private function facility to cater for house guests, for small in-house events such as weddings and birthdays was approved. This ‘function room’ was ancillary to the primary use and limited to a maximum of 26 guests.
Prior to the issue of the unauthorised use letter dated 1 November 2017 the premises conducted small weddings and events as per the approval. These events resulted in no detrimental impact to the amenity of the area.
An aerial plan showing the site features of the above site can be seen in Figure 1.
8
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 3 Page 3
Figure 1 Aerial Site Plan
2.3 Regional and Local Context
2.3.1 Site context and proposed development
The subject site is located in the Shire of Augusta-Margaret River, in the suburb of Gracetown; approximately 5.9km from the Margaret River townsite and approximately 0.8km to the east of Leeuwin-Naturaliste National Park. The site location is shown below annotated by a red symbol.
9
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 4 Page 4
Figure 2 Context Plan
The objective to permit the use of a ‘Reception Centre’ on the subject site is related to the importance (as identified in the Shire of Augusta-Margaret River Local Tourism Planning Strategy) of low impact tourism experiences such as weddings and conferences for the vitality of the subject site.
2.4 Contaminated Sites
A search of the Department of Environment Regulation Contaminated Sites Database (11 June 2018) reveals that the subject site is not listed as a contaminated site.
10
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 5 Page 5
2.5 Acid Sulfate Soils
A search of the Department of Environmental Regulation Acid Sulfate Soils (ASS) Database (11 June 2018) reveals that there is a moderate to low ASS Risk over the subject site occurring within 3.0m of natural soil surface but high to moderate risk of ASS beyond 3.0m of natural soil surface. The ASS risk is located towards the northern water body adjacent to Old Ellen Brook Road. Notwithstanding this, no ground disturbance is required as part of this proposal in any event.
2.6 Bushfire Risk
In accordance with SPP 3.7 – Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas (SPP 3.7) a Bushfire Management Plan (BMP) has been prepared for Lot 5 by Bushfire Prone Planning to support the Scheme Amendment and is provided in Appendix C.
The objectives of the BMP are as follows:
• Achieve consistency with objectives and policy measures of SPP 3.7;
• Assess any building requirements to AS3959-2009 (current and endorsed standards) and BAL Construction; and
• Assess the development proposal against the Bushfire Protection Criteria Acceptable Solutions as outlined in the Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas.
A Bushfire Evacuation (response) Plan has also been created to prepare and provide strategic guidance to the owners and occupants of the subject property in the event of a bushfire threat to the property.
2.7 Pre-Lodgement Consultation
Key outcomes from this pre-lodgement consultation were:
Table 2 – Pre-lodgement Consultation
Agency Date of consultation
Method of consultation
Summary of outcome
Shire of Augusta-Margaret River
June 2018 Email Acting Statutory Planning Coordinator, Angela Satre provided advice regarding the current zoning and matters to be address as part of an In-principle Amendment.
Shire of Augusta-Margaret River
December 2018 In-principle Scheme Amendment Application
The Shire advised that they were prepared to support a future application to initiate an amendment to rezone the subject site. Subject to the following:
• Preparation of a Bushfire Management Plan and Bushfire Evacuation Plan.
• Confirmation from DFES and Main Roads WA that the proposed
11
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 6 Page 6
access arrangement is supported and consistent with the requirements of the Bushfire Protection Criteria of the Planning for Bushfire Guidelines.
12
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 7 Page 7
3.0 State and Local Planning Framework The following state and local planning framework documents have been identified as being relevant to the subject land and are addressed below.
3.1 State Planning Framework
3.1.1 State Planning Policy 6.1: Leeuwin-Naturaliste Ridge Policy
The purpose of the Leeuwin Naturaliste Ridge Policy (LNRSPP) is to provide the strategic planning framework for the area for a 30-year period, this is achieved through providing greater vision, guidance and certainty of land use.
The Policy seeks to promote sustainable development, conservation, and land use and resource management across the two regional local authorities, Augusta-Margaret River and Busselton in order to provide a clear direction on future land use of the policy area.
In the context of tourism development, LNRSPP seeks to promote “a diverse and sustainable base which complements the existing character and lifestyle of the policy area (which) will be facilitated by:
• encouraging nature-based and cultural tourism opportunities;
• focusing coastal tourism in designated nodes;
• integrating large-scale tourist development into Principal Centres and other settlements;
• promoting low-scale tourist development that is consistent with local characteristics;
• encouraging innovative tourism development that responds to the local natural and cultural environment;
• assessing land use proposals for their impact on tourism; and
• conserving those landscape, cultural and environmental values that offer future tourism potential.”
The proposed ‘Additional Use’ is believed to be sympathetic to the statement of intent for tourism development within the region, particularly points 4 and 5 which seek to promote innovated small-scale tourism that preserve and promote the biological diversity of the region.
It is considered that the proposed ‘Additional Use’ meets the definition of a ‘low-impact development’ in accordance with LNRSPP Appendix 1- Glossary of Terms. As per Appendix 1, the use and development are to be of a manner that does not detract from the rural and natural amenity. As the proposed ‘Additional Use’ is complimentary to the existing land use and does not propose any further development it is believed that all development is sensitively located to minimise the ecological and visual amenity impact. Furthermore the ‘Additional Use’ is believed to be of a scale and nature to be self-sustaining on the lot and can efficiently utilise existing servicing.
13
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 8 Page 8
In addition, Policy Statement 5.4 of the Policy cites that, “low-impact tourist development will be considered in rural locations where the development;
• will not adversely affect the character of the surrounding area;
• comprises only buildings or structures which are small in scale and unobtrusive;
• is consistent with the transport and environmental policies of the LNRSPP; and
• in the case of an agricultural area, is incidental or complementary to the agricultural use.”
It is strongly believed that the proposed ‘Additional Use’ for a ‘Reception Centre’ on site satisfies the above requirement and is deemed suitable for its locality. The proposed ‘Reception Centre’ will have suitable planning controls to ensure that its operation will not detrimentally impact upon the rural character of the surrounding area. The proposal utilises existing built form previously approved for the desired use which is of a size and scale that is unobtrusive and adequately screened by natural vegetation. As detailed the proposed ‘Additional Use’ seeks to utilise an existing approved use and is therefore consistent with the transport and environmental policies cited in the LNRSPP. Finally, whilst the subject site is not used for active agricultural use it does not present a detrimental impact to the surrounding land use, in particular the adjacent priority agriculture east of Caves Road.
3.1.2 Draft Leeuwin Naturaliste Sub-regional Planning Strategy
The Leeuwin-Naturaliste Sub-regional Planning Strategy (LNSPS) is an overarching planning document that outlines the Western Australian Planning Commission’s approach to future planning and development within the City of Busselton and the Shire of Augusta-Margaret River
The purpose of the sub-regional strategy is to guide urban, industrial, rural and regional land use planning and associated infrastructure delivery in the Leeuwin-Naturaliste sub-region for the short, medium and long term. In particularly the LNSPS:
• identifies the WAPC’s position on landscape, environmental issues, transport, water resources, agriculture, tourism and the managing the risks of fire, flood, sea level rise and storms and extreme weather events; and
• seeks to ensure growth and development across the Leeuwin-Naturaliste sub-region is well planned, accessible and maintains and enhances the unique character and environment of the area.
Importantly the WAPC recognises the fundamental land use interface between agriculture, rural land and landscape amenity areas with the unique tourism opportunities the sub-region offers. This position is considered to be supportive to the proposed scheme amendment which seeks an additional use (reception centre) to the existing low impact tourism use of a ‘Tourist Accommodation Facility’.
3.1.3 State Planning Policy 3.7 Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas
A Bushfire Management Plan (BMP) has been prepared for the site to address all applicable legislation, policy, standards and guidelines including the four elements of the Bushfire Protection Criteria of location, siting and design, vehicular access and firefighting water supply. The BMP is provided in Appendix 4
14
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 9 Page 9
3.2 Local Planning Framework
3.2.1 Shire of Augusta-Margaret River Local Planning Scheme No. 1
The Shire of Augusta-Margaret River Local Planning Scheme No. 1 (‘the Scheme’) was gazetted in September 2010 and is the principal statutory planning mechanism regulating land use and development within the Shire of Augusta-Margaret River local government area.
The subject site is currently zoned ‘Chalet and Camping’ under the Scheme. The ‘Tourist Accommodation Facility’ was re-developed in August 2007 to include extensions to the operation, this included a function facility, day spa, proposed new buildings to include a honeymoon suite and managers residence. As part of the 2007 alterations it was intended that the existing building would be converted into a private function facility to cater for house guests, for the use of “in-house events such as weddings, birthdays, anniversaries as well as small corporate events”.
Figure 3 Existing Town Planning Scheme Zoning
The amendment sought constitutes no new development other than what already exists on the subject site and the proposed amendment seeks only to amend the planning framework to allow for the Shire’s consideration of a ‘Reception Centre’ over the subject site. However, as part of the amendment strict planning and operational controls are proposed in order to ensure that the additional use is of no detriment to the amenity of the location or surrounding landowners.
15
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 10 Page 10
Clause 4.5 of the Scheme provides for the inclusion of ‘Additional Uses’ beyond that permitted in the Zoning Table for a particular site, stating:
“Despite anything contained in the Zoning and Land Use Table, the land specified in Schedule 2 may be used for the specific use or uses that are listed in addition to any uses permissible in the zone in which the land is situated subject to the conditions set out in Schedule 2 with respect to that land.”
‘Reception Centre’ is an ‘X’ use in the Chalet and Camping zone, it is therefore possible to allow a reception centre by including an Additional Use provision under Schedule 2 of the Scheme.
The objectives of the Chalet and Camping zone are as follow;
(a) To provide for sustainable low-impact tourist development that is of a high standard in terms of design and amenity, and which is sympathetic to and integrated with the rural and/or natural attributes of the surrounding area so as to ensure that all land uses and development:
i) have a minimal adverse impact upon the ecological and landscape values of the land and the environmental qualities of the locality; and
ii) are of a high standard in terms of design and amenity, and which are sympathetic to and integrate with the natural landscape attributes of the surrounding area.
The proposed development is considered to meet the definition of ‘low-impact tourist development’ under the Scheme based on compliance with the following criteria:
Table 3 – Low-impact Tourism Development
Criteria Response
(a) development being located so as to avoid ridge lines, escarpments or visually exposed sites and situated where screening vegetation or landform can be utilised
The existing use and proposed additional use is located within a low lying area (55 AHD) which much of the surrounding land use to the east and west being location at significantly higher levels of 65 AHD. The lot is also suitably screened by dense native vegetation around the cadastral boundary.
(b) use and development being sensitively located and designed to minimise impact on vegetation, watercourses, soil quality and existing land uses
The additional use does not propose any additional development. It is considered that no impact is made to native vegetation and water resources.
(c) development being of a scale and nature so as to be self-sustaining on the lot or demonstrating the ability to provide servicing without significant modifications to existing infrastructure;
The additional use is considered self-sustaining on the subject allotment as no additional or altered servicing is required to support the use.
(d) development that by the nature of its scale, design, colours, materials, landscaping and
The existing and proposed use seeks to minimise the impact on the surrounding locality as the prevailing agriculture/ rural setting provides the basis for the tourism attraction. The current land use
16
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 11 Page 11
Criteria Response
use, has minimal impact on its site and surrounding areas; and
is screened by dense native vegetation to the exterior boundaries, as such the visual exposure of the use to adjoining land is reduced.
(e) where the land use and any development has a minimal off-site consequence.
The proposed additional use is contained wholly onsite and supplements the existing approved land use.
Clause 4.20 of Scheme details requirements of development in the ‘Chalet and Camping’ zone. Justification against the required development criteria is provided below:
Table 4 – Chalet and Camping Zone Requirements
Criteria Justification
(a) not adversely impact the environmental or landscape qualities of the locality;
The additional use proposes no detrimental impact to the environment or landscape quality of the area.
(b) maximise the retention of any native vegetation on the site; All existing native vegetation is retained on site.
(c) be located to avoid ridgelines, escarpments or visually exposed sites when viewed from any adjoining public or private land or public roads and is situated to maximise screening of the development by vegetation and/or existing landform features;
The existing use and proposed additional use is located within a low lying area (55 AHD) with much of the surrounding land use to the east and west being location at significantly higher levels (65 AHD).
(d) be located to minimise any adverse impacts on existing native vegetation, watercourses, soil and existing adjacent land uses including agricultural land uses;
As the additional use does not propose any new development or built form, minimal impact to vegetation is considered to occur. The location of the additional use is considered to ensure minimal adverse impact to the surrounding area. Strict development controls are proposed to ensure the operation of the ‘Additional Use’ does not detrimentally impact upon the adjoining land holdings.
(e) have a minimum setback of 100 metres from any adjoining State Reserve unless the local government, DEC and FESA are satisfied that the State Reserve or existing agricultural land use will not be adversely impacted by the proposal; and
The proposed additional use is contained wholly onsite and supplements the existing approved land use. The operations of the use is not considered to adversely impact upon the operations of adjoining agricultural land holdings.
17
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 12 Page 12
Criteria Justification
(f) be of a scale and nature that will be sustainable on the lot by demonstrating that the development will not require any significant modification or up-grading of existing infrastructure including water, sewer, and road networks.
The scale and nature of the development is considered to meet the definition of ‘low-impact tourist development’. Minor upgrades are anticipated to be required for the upgrade of the existing site access way to satisfy bushfire management requirements An increase in the number of toilet and washrooms is required to accommodate the use. It is anticipated that an additional 3 portable toilets will be proposed on site during event operation. The total number of toilets and washrooms proposed on site is therefore 17.
The proposed ‘Additional Use’ is an appropriate land use in the ‘Chalet and Camping’ zone given that:
• Existing infrastructure/ built form is used to support the use- no new development is proposed;
• The additional and existing land use meet the Scheme definition of ‘low impact tourist development’;
• No subdivision is proposed or envisaged as part of the amendment;
• The proposed additional use has no adverse impact upon the ecological and landscape value of the subject site and the environmental qualities of the locality; and
3.2.2 Shire of Augusta-Margaret River Local Tourism Planning Strategy
The Shire of Augusta-Margaret River Local Tourism Planning Strategy (the Strategy) examines the existing and projected tourism industry within the Shire of Augusta-Margaret River. Due to the importance of tourism in the region the Strategy recognises it is essential to the wellbeing of the industry and broader community to evaluate tourism issues and provide an appropriate response from the Local Authority.
Sustainability is a key theme embodied within the Strategy and LPS, which reflects the vision of the local community. Sustainable tourism is based on the three ‘pillars’ of sustainability (economic, social and environmental). In the context of the proposed ‘Additional Use’ the social/ cultural sustainability of the proposal is of high importance due to the surrounding sensitive land uses.
Section 2.6.3 of the Strategy recognises that rural and agricultural land is an important part of the local community. Accordingly, the Strategy states that “tourism development proposals are only likely to be acceptable in locations where it is demonstrated that the scale of the development is compatible with surrounding land uses, landscape quality, lifestyle, infrastructure and the general social and community fabric of the locality”. Importantly low impact tourism experiences such as the proposed additional use are appropriate in nature areas such as the subject site however must ensure that the proposal can be introduced with minimal impact and intrusion on the host community or neighbouring land owners.
18
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 13 Page 13
Section 4.4 of the Strategy outlines the objectives and policy guidance to be used by proponents and the Shire when assessing development for tourism purposes. This policy is particularly relevant where development is proposed adjacent to environmental or landscape significant localities, such as the Leeuwin Naturaliste Ridge Landscape Amenity conservation zone to the west of the subject site. The Strategy provides policy guidance in the form and layout of new tourism development. Table 4.4 lists specific policy objectives for proposed tourism development:
Table 5 – New Tourism Development Requirements
Policy Objectives Justification
1. Support a range of tourism developments in different locations incorporating best practice environmental sustainability principles.
The proposed additional use seeks to utilise the existing development on the subject site to facilitate the ‘Reception Centre’ use. The existing low impact development which received development approval in 2007 has implemented and adhered to a number of environmental requirements as part of the conditions of development approval. This includes:
• water sensitive urban design principles for the disposal of stormwater.
• Conservation of biological diversity and native vegetation.
• Planting of 5.0m strip of native vegetation to western boundary of subject lot.
• Protection of watercourse located on site.
The additional use which is ancillary to the primary use will ensure a continued focus on conserving and managing environmental resources on site.
2. Ensure tourist accommodation, associated infrastructure and attractions are provided in a manner that maintains the areas environmental integrity, and to ensure cultural and historical values are conserved, managed, protected and used sustainably for future generations.
The proposed additional use and existing land use is strongly believed to be provided in a sustainable manner to ensure the protection of significant flora and fauna and the improvement of natural habitats.
The additional use which will be managed in accordance with suitable development controls is also believed to be sympathetic to the locational value of the community, which has a strong focus on retention of natural attributes, character and amenity of the agricultural lifestyle.
19
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 14 Page 14
The proposed additional use of a ‘Reception Centre’ on the subject site is believed to be in accordance with the primary focus of the Strategy, this being to “establish forward thinking in sustainable tourism, which is not only economically productive but also aims to protect and enhance natural and cultural environments for both visitors and the local community”. As demonstrated above, the proposal conserves both the biodiversity and cultural value of the locality for future generations
3.2.3 Local Planning Policies
None of the local planning policies apply to the proposed scheme amendment over the subject site.
20
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 15 Page 15
4.0 Environmental Constraints
4.1 Noise Assessment Lloyd George Acoustics have been engaged to complete an environmental noise assessment to determine the likely noise impact to neighbouring allotments as a direct result of the proposed reception centre land use as well as provide advice on suitable noise management. The noise assessment is provided in Appendix B.
Figure 4 below demonstrates the predicted noise levels during an outdoor wedding ceremony. It assumes an amplified acoustic artist or celebrant and 90 guests talking at a higher conversation level.
Figure 4 Noise Assessment – Outdoor Wedding Ceremony
The figure demonstrates that the predicted noise levels during the wedding ceremony is below 25 dB LA10 at the most affected noise sensitive premises. This level of noise would comply with the assigned levels at all times. Figure 5 below shows the predicted LA10 noise levels during the wedding reception held in the premises and courtyard area. It assumes an amplified acoustic artist or DJ and 90 guests talking at a normal “beer garden” level.
21
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 16 Page 16
Figure 5 Noise Assessment – Outdoor Wedding Reception
The figure demonstrates that the predicted noise levels during the wedding reception is 25 dB LA10 at the most affected noise sensitive premises (which is identified as the houses to the south of the venue). This level of noise would comply with the assigned levels at all times. If desired, the music level could be 5 dB higher before 10.00 p.m. and still be compliant. To ensure that any noise impacts associated with an event are minimised, the noise assessment recommends the following management measures:
• Sound levels should be measured before an event to set the correct level or a system installed to limit the PA output. If noise levels are found to be above the set limit, then the PA volume should be turned down immediately;
• Curfew times for events should be determined in consultation with the Shire;
• Residences surrounding venue should be contacted to discuss the proposal and provided with details of the noise management measures and a contact number should the resident seek further information, or has any concerns regarding noise; and
• Details of any complaints regarding noise should be recorded and the noise at the complainant’s property measured if practicable. The Shire should be contacted within 48 hours of any complaint and provided with details and any action taken to rectify the problem.
22
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 17 Page 17
The results of the acoustic assessment show that with the recommended noise management, the property located on 3 (Lot 5) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River, can operate as a wedding reception centre and achieve compliance with the assigned levels under the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997.
4.2 Bushfire Management Plan Bushfire Prone Planning have been engaged to complete a Bushfire Management Plan (BMP) to assess the short, medium and long-term risk management strategies for the life of the proposed development.
The development site of approximately 9.1 hectares is within a designated bushfire prone area and the proposal requires the application of State Planning Policy No. 3.7: Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas (SPP 3.7).
The assessed bushfire risk is considered to be manageable and will be achieved by the identified stakeholders implementing and maintaining the bushfire risk management measures that are presented in the plan.
The proposal, as set out in this application has addressed all applicable legislation, policy, standards and guidelines including the four elements of the Bushfire Protection Criteria of location, siting and design, vehicular access and firefighting water supply. The determination is that the proposal can meet all requirements against the Bushfire Protection Criteria, the decision maker’s assessment of this Proposal is to be on the basis of it being able to meet the acceptable solutions for all four elements.
Indicative BAL ratings of BAL-29 or less can be achieved on all of the existing buildings and proposed development area. The proposed development achieves compliance by ensuring the existing buildings and proposed development is located on an area that will be subject to potential radiant heat from a bushfire not exceeding 29 kW/m2. Therefore, a BAL rating of BAL-29 or less will apply.
The detailed findings of the BMP are enclosed as Appendix C.
4.3 Bushfire Evacuation (Response) Plan
Bushfire Prone Planning has also been engaged to create a Bushfire Evacuation (Response) Plan for the site, with specific consideration to the management of a bushfire emergency. The evacuation response plan has given due consideration to the vehicle access/egress options for the proposed development and precautionary measures have been incorporated into the plan to minimise risk to the future occupants.
The Bushfire Evacuation (Response Plan) is provided in Appendix D.
23
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 18 Page 18
5.0 Site Details As stated previously, the subject site is currently approved for a ‘Tourist Accommodation Facility’ and as such contains buildings associated with that use. The proposed ‘Additional Use’ of a ‘Reception Centre’ will seek to utilise existing buildings and area to facilitate the operation of the use, this includes:
• Ceremonies to be hosted within the gardens of the subject property;
• ‘Receptions’ to be held within the grassed courtyard between the ‘Homestead’ and ‘Lodge’ under a temporary marquee;
• Entertainment provided by a band, singer or DJ located inside the building facing towards the courtyard area with the doors remaining open; and
• Vehicles and buses to be parked within the designated parking area;
A plan showing the proposed “Reception Centre’ layout has been provided in Figure 6.
Figure 6 Reception Centre layout
24
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 19 Page 19
5.2 Development Controls
The following development controls are believed to enable the function of the ‘Reception Centre as an additional use as well as ensuring the rural amenity of the locality is not detrimentally impacted. These include:
Operations Receptions only to be held in the grassed ‘courtyard’ between the Homestead and Lodge buildings. All receptions to conclude by 11.30pm. Number of attendees at weddings or events to be a maximum of 90. Plus, an additional 20 staff. 2 x weddings per month between the months on September to May. January, March and April weddings will be reduced to 1 x per month due to public holidays. No weddings to be held over long weekends or public holidays.
The reception centre will host other events or be the location for corporate events, celebration of milestone events, group bookings etc and in those cases, the above stipulations in regard to music, transport, alcohol consumption will apply.
Noise Management
Noise levels during wedding ceremonies and receptions must not exceed 25 dB LA10 at the most affected noise sensitive premises. This level of noise would comply with the assigned levels at all times.
Vehicle Parking
Vehicle to be parked in the allocated car parking area.
Vehicle ingress and egress only permitted via Old Ellenbrook Road.
Bushfire Management
A Fire Management Plan shall be prepared and approved by the local government prior to occupation of the development and implemented accordingly.
An Evacuation Plan shall be prepared and approved by the local government prior to occupation of the development and implemented accordingly.
25
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 20 Page 20
6.0 Proposed Scheme Amendment The proposed Amendment is considered ‘standard’ under the provisions of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015.
It is proposed to insert additional use provisions into Schedule 2 of Local Planning Scheme No. 1 to allow a ‘Reception Centre’ as an Additional Use over Lot 5, Old Ellen Brook Road.
Table 6 – Proposed Schedule 2 Amendment
No. Description of Land Additional Uses Development Conditions
A Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road Reception Centre
Operations
1. Receptions only to be held in the grassed ‘courtyard’ between the Homestead and Lodge buildings.
2. All receptions to conclude by 11.30pm.
3. Number of attendees at weddings or events to be a maximum of 90. Plus, an additional 20 staff.
4. 2 x weddings per month between the months on September to May.
5. January, March and April weddings will be reduced to 1 x per month due to public holidays.
6. No weddings to be held over long weekends or public holidays.
7. The reception centre will host other events or be the location for corporate events, celebration of milestone events, group bookings etc and in those cases, the above stipulations in regard to music, transport, alcohol consumption will apply.
Noise Management
8. Noise levels at during wedding ceremonies and receptions must not exceed 25 dB LA10 at the most affected noise sensitive premises.
26
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1 Page 21 Page 21
No. Description of Land Additional Uses Development Conditions Vehicle Parking
9. Vehicle to be parked in the allocated car parking area.
10. Vehicle ingress and egress only permitted via Old Ellenbrook Road.
Bushfire Management
11. A Fire Management Plan shall be prepared and approved by the local government prior to occupation of the development and implemented accordingly.
12. An Evacuation Plan shall be prepared and approved by the local government prior to occupation of the development and implemented accordingly.
27
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1-2 Page 24
7.0 Conclusion This report has been prepared to support a proposed amendment to the Shire of Augusta-Margaret River Local Planning Scheme No. 1. The proposed amendment seeks to incorporate a ‘Reception Centre’ as an ‘Additional Use’ under Schedule 2 of the Scheme over the subject site, in order to permit the hosting of weddings and events on the site. It is believed that this will contribute to the overall economic prosperity and viability for the existing ‘Chalet’ land use.
In summary, the proposed scheme amendment:
• Is consistent with planning objectives established by SPP 6.1 Leeuwin-Naturaliste Ridge, Draft Leeuwin Naturaliste Sub-regional Planning Strategy, Shire of Augusta-Margaret River Local planning Scheme, Local Planning Strategy, Local Tourism Planning Strategy;
• Will not result in any adverse impact to the rural amenity of the locality by way of noise levels in excess of the assigned levels, as established by the Noise Assessment;
• The Proposal has addressed all applicable legislation, policy, standards and guidelines including the four elements of the Bushfire Protection Criteria of location, siting and design, vehicular access and firefighting water supply as established by the Bushfire Management Plan/ Evacuation Plan; and
• Is consistent with the principles of orderly and proper planning and seeks to achieve a desirable land use outcome that will not adversely affect the character of the surrounding area.
28
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1-2
APPENDIX A
Certificates of Title
29
LANDGATE COPY OF ORIGINAL NOT TO SCALE
www.landgate.wa.gov.au
JOB 58413833Mon Feb 11 15:12:06 201930
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1-2
APPENDIX B
Noise Assessment
31
Lloyd George Acoustics
POBox717HillarysWA6923
T:93004188F:93004199www.lgacoustics.com.au
Environmental Noise Assessment
Proposed Reception Centre 3 (Lot 5) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River
Reference: 18084580-01 draft
Prepared for: GilgaraRetreat
32
Report:18084580-01draft
LloydGeorgeAcousticsPtyLtdABN:79125812544
Contacts DanielLloyd TerryGeorge MattMoyle OlivierMallié
E:
M:
0439032844
0400414197
0412611330
0439987455
Date: Rev Description PreparedBy Verified
7/09/18 - Issuedtoclient DanielLloyd TerryGeorge
Thisreporthasbeenpreparedinaccordancewiththescopeofservicesdescribedinthecontractor
agreementbetweenLloydGeorgeAcousticsPtyLtdandtheClient.Thereportreliesupondata,surveys,
measurementsandresultstakenatorundertheparticulartimesandconditionsspecifiedherein.Any
findings,conclusionsorrecommendationsonlyapplytotheaforementionedcircumstancesandnogreater
relianceshouldbeassumedordrawnbytheClient.Furthermore,thereporthasbeenpreparedsolelyfor
usebytheClient,andLloydGeorgeAcousticsPtyLtdacceptsnoresponsibilityforitsusebyotherparties.
33
Lloyd George Acoustics
Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION__________________________________________________________________________1
2 CRITERIA________________________________________________________________________________3
3 METHODOLOGY__________________________________________________________________________5
3.1 MeteorologicalInformation_____________________________________________________________5
3.2 TopographicalData____________________________________________________________________5
3.3 GroundAbsorption____________________________________________________________________6
3.4 SoundLevels_________________________________________________________________________6
4 RESULTS________________________________________________________________________________7
5 ASSESSMENTANDRECOMMENDATIONS_____________________________________________________12
6 CONCLUSION___________________________________________________________________________13
List of Tables Table2-1AdjustmentsforIntrusiveCharacteristics _______________________________________________3
Table2-2BaselineAssignedNoiseLevels _______________________________________________________4
Table3-1ModellingMeteorologicalConditions __________________________________________________5
List of Figures Figure1-1GeneralLocalityandSensitiveReceivers _______________________________________________1
Figure1-2ProposedReceptionAreaLayout_____________________________________________________2
Figure1-3PhotographofCourtyard ___________________________________________________________2
Figure4-1PredictedLA10NoiseContoursDuringaWeddingCeremony________________________________8
Figure4-2PredictedLA10NoiseContoursDuringaWeddingReception________________________________9
Figure4-3PredictedLA10NoisefromVehiclesintheCarPark_______________________________________10
Figure4-4PredictedLAmaxNoisefromCarDoorsClosingintheCarPark______________________________11
Appendices A Terminology
34
Lloyd George Acoustics
Reference:18084580-01.docx Page1
1 INTRODUCTION
Itisproposedtousethehomesteadlocatedon3(Lot5)OldEllenBrookRoad,MargaretRiverasareceptioncentre.ThegenerallocalityisshowninFigure1-1.
Lloyd George Acoustics have been engaged to assess the likely noise impacts to neighbouringresidences as a result of an event held at the homestead and to provide advice on suitable noisemanagementforthevenue.
AppendixAcontainsadescriptionofsomeoftheterminologyusedthroughoutthisreport.
Figure 1-1 General Locality and Sensitive Receivers
It is proposed to hold wedding receptions in the courtyard area of the homestead, withentertainmentprovidedbysmallbands,singersorDJ (nodrums) locatedwithinthebarnwiththedoorstothecourtyardopen.Amarqueewouldcoverthecourtyard.ThisisillustratedinFigure1-2withaphotographofthecourtyardareaprovidedinFigure1-3.
It is proposed that up to 90 guests would attend a wedding with proceedings concluding at11.30pm.Inadditiontothepostweddingentertainment(bandinthebarn),anacousticartistwithlightamplificationmayplaybeforeandaftertheweddingceremonyoutsideintheceremonyarea.
LocationofReceptionCentre
SensitiveReceiver
SensitiveReceiver
35
Lloyd George Acoustics
Reference:18084580-01.docx Page2
Figure 1-2 Proposed Reception Area Layout
Figure 1-3 Photograph of Courtyard
BarnDoors
36
Lloyd George Acoustics
Reference:18084580-01.docx Page3
2 CRITERIA
Environmental noise in Western Australia is governed by the Environmental Protection Act 1986,throughtheEnvironmentalProtection(Noise)Regulations1997(theregulations).
Regulation7definestheprescribedstandardfornoiseemissionsasfollows:
“7.(1)Noiseemittedfromanypremisesorpublicplacewhenreceivedatotherpremises–
(a) Must not cause or significantly contribute to, a level of noise which exceeds theassignedlevelinrespectofnoisereceivedatpremisesofthatkind;and
(b) Mustbefreeof–
i. Tonality;
ii. Impulsiveness;and
iii. Modulation”.
A “…noise emission is taken to significantly contribute to a level of noise if the noise emissionexceedsavaluewhichis5dBbelowtheassignedlevel…”
Tonality,impulsivenessandmodulationaredefinedinRegulation9.Noiseistobetakentobefreeofthesecharacteristicsif:
(a) Thecharacteristicscannotbereasonablyandpracticablyremovedbytechniquesotherthanattenuatingtheoveralllevelofnoiseemission;and
(b) ThenoiseemissioncomplieswiththestandardaftertheadjustmentsofTable2-1aremadetothenoiseemissionasmeasuredatthepointofreception.
Table 2-1 Adjustments for Intrusive Characteristics
Tonality Modulation Impulsiveness
MusicWhere
impulsivenessisnotpresent
Where
impulsivenessispresent
+5dB +5dB +10dB +10dB +15dB
Note:Theabovearecumulativetoamaximumof15dB.
Thebaselineassigned levels (prescribedstandards)arespecified inRegulation8andareshown inTable2-2.
37
Lloyd George Acoustics
Reference:18084580-01.docx Page4
Table 2-2 Baseline Assigned Noise Levels
PremisesReceivingNoise
TimeOfDayAssignedLevel(dB)
LA10 LA1 LAmax
Noisesensitivepremises:highlysensitivearea1
0700to1900hoursMondaytoSaturday(Day)
45+influencing
factor
55+influencing
factor
65+influencing
factor
0900to1900hoursSundayandpublicholidays(Sunday)
40+influencing
factor
50+influencing
factor
65+influencing
factor
1900to2200hoursalldays(Evening)40+
influencingfactor
50+influencing
factor
55+influencing
factor
2200hoursonanydayto0700hoursMondaytoSaturdayand0900hoursSundayandpublicholidays(Night)
35+influencing
factor
45+influencing
factor
55+influencing
factor
Noisesensitivepremises:anyareaotherthanhighly
sensitivearea
Allhours 60 75 80
1. highlysensitiveareameansthatarea(ifany)ofnoisesensitivepremisescomprising— (a) abuilding,orapartofabuilding,onthepremisesthatisusedforanoisesensitivepurpose;and (b) anyotherpartofthepremiseswithin15metresofthatbuildingorthatpartofthebuilding;
Astheareaispredominantlyruralresidential,theinfluencingfactorapplicableatthenoisesensitivepremisesis0dB.ThereforeitisthebaselineassignedlevelsinTable2-2thatwillapply.
38
Lloyd George Acoustics
Reference:18084580-01.docx Page5
3 METHODOLOGY
Computermodellinghasbeenusedtopredictthenoiselevels,underworst-caseconditions,toeachof the receiver locations. The software used was SoundPLAN 8.0 with the CONCAWE algorithmsselectedastheyincludetheinfluenceofwindandatmosphericstability.Inputdatarequiredinthemodelare:
MeteorologicalInformation;
Topographicaldata;
GroundAbsorption;and
Sourcesoundpowerlevels.
3.1 Meteorological Information
MeteorologicalconditionsutilisedareshowninTable3-1andreflectthosespecifiedinthedraftEPAGuidancefortheAssessmentofEnvironmentalFactorsNo.8EnvironmentalNoise.Theseconditionsare considered the worst-case for noise propagation. At wind speeds greater than those shown,soundpropagationmaybe furtherenhanced,howeverbackgroundnoise fromthewind itselfandfromlocalvegetationislikelytobeelevatedanddominatetheambientnoiselevels.
Table 3-1 Modelling Meteorological Conditions
Parameter Night(1900-0700)
Temperature(oC) 15
Humidity(%) 50
WindSpeed(m/s) 3
WindDirection* All
PasquilStabilityFactor F
*Notethatthemodellingpackageusedallowsforallwinddirectionstobemodelledsimultaneously.
Themodellingprogramassumesthewindisblowingfromalldirections.Whilethisisimpossibleinreality,itallowstheworst-casenoiselevelstobeassessedatallreceiverssurroundingthepropertywithinoneimage.i.e.thewindisblowingfromtheeventtowardstheresidence.
3.2 Topographical Data
Topographical data was obtained from Google Earth. This allows the model to take intoconsiderationhillsandvalleyswithinthesurroundingterrain.
39
Lloyd George Acoustics
Reference:18084580-01.docx Page6
3.3 Ground Absorption
Groundabsorptionvariesfromavalueof0to1,with0beingforanacousticallyreflectiveground(e.g. water or bitumen) and 1 for acoustically absorbent ground (e.g. grass). In this instance, thesurrounding ground has been assumed to be acoustically absorptive, which is representative of arurallocation,andthewatercatchmentareaisassumedtobeacousticallyreflective.
3.4 Sound Levels
ThesoundpowerlevelsusedinthemodellingareprovidedinTable3-2.
Table 3-2 Source Sound Power Levels
DescriptionOctaveBandCentreFrequency(Hz) Overall
dB(A)63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k
Guests(90) - 64 69 84 82 76 68 53 86
Ceremonymusic 90 93 87 86 88 79 73 60 90
Celebrant(amplified) - 64 69 84 82 76 68 53 86
ReceptionMusic(85dB(A)inthebarn) 108 101 101 101 102 97 93 89 105
SlowMovingCar(36km/hr) 81 78 74 72 74 74 67 64 79
ClosingCarDoor,Lmax 71 74 77 81 80 78 72 61 84
Withregardstotheabove,pleasenotethefollowing:
Guestnoiseisdeterminedfromthefollowingequation:
𝐿𝐿 = 70 + 10𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 𝑁𝑁/2
where:
o LWA10isthesoundpowerlevelexceededfor10%ofthetime;ando 70dB(A)ishigherlevelofconversationo Nisthenumberofpatrons(assumes50%aretalking)
Guestsaremodelledatasourceheightof1.5metresabovegroundlevel.
Carsandcardoorsaremodelledas1-metreabovegroundlevel.
For the ceremony, located outside to the north of the homestead, the noise modellingassumes90guestsspeakingatthehigherendofconversationandanacousticartistwithamaximumnoiselevelof70dB(A)at4.0mfromthePA.
For the reception, it is assumed that a light band, which would be generally amplifiedacousticinstrumentsoraDJ(withoutsub-bass),isplayinginsideofthebarnwiththedoorsopen to the courtyard. The maximum noise level inside of the barn would be set to 85dB(A),whichcorrespondstoalevelatthecentreofthecourtyardofapproximately70dB(A).Thislevelofmusicwouldgenerallybeconsideredacceptableforweddingvenues.
40
Lloyd George Acoustics
Reference:18084580-01.docx Page7
4 RESULTS
Figure4-1showsthepredictedLA10noise levelsduringanoutdoorweddingceremony. Itassumesanamplifiedacousticartistorcelebrantand90gueststalkingatahigherconversationlevel.
Figure4-2showsthepredictedLA10noiselevelsduringtheweddingreceptionheldinthebarnandcourtyardarea.ItassumesanamplifiedacousticartistorDJand90gueststalkingatanormal“beergarden”level.
Figure4-3showsthepredictedLA10noiselevelsfromcarsandcoachesenteringandleavingthecarpark.
Figure4-4showsthepredictedLAmaxnoiselevelsfromcardoorsclosinginthecarpark.
41
Noise level LA10 dB
= 25 Exceeds Regulations= 30= 35= 40= 45= 50= 55= 60= 65
25
25
25
25
25
30
30
30
35
35
40
455055
Length Scale0 25 50 100 150 200
m
Figure 4-1
Proposed Reception Centre - 3 (Lot 5) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret RiverPredicted LA10 Noise Levels from Outdoor Wedding CeremonyWind from All Directions
Lloyd George Acousticsby Daniel [email protected](08) 9300 4188
GEORGE
LLOYD
A c o u s t i c s 42
Noise level LA10 dB
= 25 Exceeds Regulations= 30= 35= 40= 45= 50= 55= 60= 65
25
25
25
25
25
25
25 30
3030
30
30
35
35
35
35
35
40
40
40
45
5055
Length Scale0 25 50 100 150 200
m
Figure 4-2
Proposed Reception Centre - 3 (Lot 5) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret RiverPredicted LA10 Noise Levels from Courtyard Wedding ReceptionWind from All Directions
Lloyd George Acousticsby Daniel [email protected](08) 9300 4188
GEORGE
LLOYD
A c o u s t i c s 43
Noise level LA10 dB
= 25 Exceeds Regulations= 30= 35= 40= 45= 50= 55= 60= 65
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
30
303030
35
35
40
4550
55
Length Scale0 25 50 100 150 200
m
Figure 4-3
Proposed Reception Centre - 3 (Lot 5) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret RiverPredicted LA10 Noise Levels from Vehicles in the Car ParkWind from All Directions
Lloyd George Acousticsby Daniel [email protected](08) 9300 4188
GEORGE
LLOYD
A c o u s t i c s 44
Noise level LA10 dB
= 25 Exceeds Regulations= 30= 35= 40= 45= 50= 55= 60= 65
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
30
30
30
30
35
35
40
4550
55
Length Scale0 25 50 100 150 200
m
Figure 4-4
Proposed Reception Centre - 3 (Lot 5) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret RiverPredicted LAmax Noise Levels from Car Doors Closing in the Car ParkWind from All Directions
Lloyd George Acousticsby Daniel [email protected](08) 9300 4188
GEORGE
LLOYD
A c o u s t i c s 45
Lloyd George Acoustics
Reference:18084580-01.docx Page12
5 ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Figure 4-1 shows that the predicted noise levels during the wedding ceremony, assuming theconstraintsoutlinedinsection4.5,isbelow25dBLA10atthemostaffectednoisesensitivepremises.Thislevelofnoisewouldcomplywiththeassignedlevelsatalltimes.Thisassumesapenaltyof+10dBduetotheperceptionofmusicatthereceiverlocation.
Figure 4-2 shows that the predicted noise levels during the wedding reception, assuming theconstraintsoutlinedinSection4.5,is25dBLA10atthemostaffectednoisesensitivepremises,whichis identified as the houses to the south of the venue. This level of noise would comply with theassignedlevelsatalltimes. Ifdesired,themusic levelcouldbe5dBhigherbefore10.00p.m.andstillbecompliant.Thisassumesapenaltyof+10dBduetotheperceptionofmusicatthereceiverlocation.
Figures 4-3 and 4-4 shows that the predicted noise levels from vehicles utilising the parking areawouldcomplywiththeassignedlevelsatalltimes.ItassumesthatcarsleavingandenteringwouldrepresenttheLA10levelandthecardoorsclosingwouldrepresenttheLAmaxlevel.
ItshouldbenotedthatthisassessmentassumesastandardPAsystemofloudspeakerboxeslocatedeithersideofthestagearea,approximately1.8mabovetheground.Fortheweddingceremony,itisassumedthatthePAisfacingsouthwest.FortheweddingreceptionitisassumedthatthePAisinsideofthebarnfacingtowardsthecourtyardandthebarndoorsareopen.
To ensure that any noise impacts associated with an event are minimised, the followingmanagementmeasuresarerecommended:
Sound levels should be measured before an event to set the correct level or a systeminstalledtolimitthePAoutput.Ifnoiselevelsarefoundtobeabovethesetlimit,thenthePAvolumeshouldbeturneddownimmediately;
CurfewtimesforeventsshouldbedeterminedinconsultationwiththeShire;
Residences surrounding venue should be contacted to discuss the proposal and providedwithdetailsofthenoisemanagementmeasuresandacontactnumbershouldtheresidentseekfurtherinformation,orhasanyconcernsregardingnoise;and
Details of any complaints regarding noise should be recorded and the noise at thecomplainant’s property measured if practicable. The Shire should be contacted within 48hours of any complaint and provided with details and any action taken to rectify theproblem.
46
Lloyd George Acoustics
Reference:18084580-01.docx Page13
6 CONCLUSION
Theresultsofthisassessmentshowthatwiththerecommendednoisemanagement,thepropertylocated on 3 (Lot 5) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River, can operate as a wedding receptioncentreandachievecompliancewiththeassignedlevelsundertheEnvironmentalProtection(Noise)Regulations1997.
47
Appendix A
Terminology
48
Lloyd George Acoustics
Reference:18084580-01.docx PageA1
Thefollowingisanexplanationoftheterminologyusedthroughoutthisreport.
Decibel(dB)Thedecibelistheunitthatdescribesthesoundpressureandsoundpowerlevelsofanoisesource.Itisalogarithmicscalereferencedtothethresholdofhearing.
A-WeightingAnA-weightednoiselevelhasbeenfilteredinsuchawayastorepresentthewayinwhichthehumanearperceivessound. Thisweightingreflectsthefactthatthehumanear isnotassensitiveto lowerfrequenciesasitistohigherfrequencies.AnA-weightedsoundlevelisdescribedasLAdB.
SoundPowerLevel(Lw)Undernormalconditions,agivensoundsourcewillradiatethesameamountofenergy,irrespectiveofitssurroundings,beingthesoundpowerlevel.Thisissimilartoa1kWelectricheateralwaysradiating1kWofheat.Thesoundpowerlevelofanoisesourcecannotbedirectlymeasuredusingasoundlevelmeterbutiscalculatedbasedonmeasuredsoundpressurelevelsatknowndistances.Noisemodellingincorporatessourcesoundpowerlevelsaspartoftheinputdata.
SoundPressureLevel(Lp)Thesoundpressure levelofanoise source isdependentupon its surroundings,being influencedbydistance, ground absorption, topography, meteorological conditions etc and is what the human earactuallyhears.Usingtheelectricheateranalogyabove,theheatwillvarydependinguponwheretheheater is located, just as the sound pressure level will vary depending on the surroundings. Noisemodellingpredictsthesoundpressurelevelfromthesoundpowerlevelstakingintoaccountgroundabsorption,barriereffects,distanceetc.
LASlowThisisthenoiselevelindecibels,obtainedusingtheAfrequencyweightingandtheStimeweightingas specified in AS1259.1-1990. Unless assessing modulation, all measurements use the slow timeweightingcharacteristic.
LAFastThisisthenoiselevelindecibels,obtainedusingtheAfrequencyweightingandtheFtimeweightingasspecifiedinAS1259.1-1990.Thisisusedwhenassessingthepresenceofmodulationonly.
LAPeakThis is the maximum reading in decibels using the A frequency weighting and P time weightingAS1259.1-1990.
LAmaxAnLAmaxlevelisthemaximumA-weightednoiselevelduringaparticularmeasurement.
LA1An LA1 level is the A-weighted noise level which is exceeded for one percent of the measurementperiodandisconsideredtorepresenttheaverageofthemaximumnoiselevelsmeasured.
LA10An LA10 level is the A-weighted noise level which is exceeded for 10 percent of the measurementperiodandisconsideredtorepresentthe“intrusive”noiselevel.
49
Lloyd George Acoustics
Reference:18084580-01.docx PageA2
LAeqTheequivalentsteadystateA-weightedsoundlevel(“equalenergy”)indecibelswhich,inaspecifiedtimeperiod,containsthesameacousticenergyasthetime-varyinglevelduringthesameperiod.Itisconsideredtorepresentthe“average”noiselevel.
LA90An LA90 level is the A-weighted noise level which is exceeded for 90 percent of the measurementperiodandisconsideredtorepresentthe“background”noiselevel.
One-Third-OctaveBandMeansabandoffrequenciesspanningone-thirdofanoctaveandhavingacentrefrequencybetween25Hzand20000Hzinclusive.
LAmaxassignedlevelMeansanassignedlevelwhich,measuredasaLASlowvalue,isnottobeexceededatanytime.
LA1assignedlevelMeansanassignedlevelwhich,measuredasaLASlowvalue,isnottobeexceededformorethan1%oftherepresentativeassessmentperiod.
LA10assignedlevelMeansanassignedlevelwhich,measuredasaLASlowvalue,isnottobeexceededformorethan10%oftherepresentativeassessmentperiod.
TonalNoiseAtonalnoisesourcecanbedescribedasasourcethathasadistinctivenoiseemissioninoneormorefrequencies.Anexamplewouldbewhiningordroning.Thequantitativedefinitionoftonalityis:
thepresenceinthenoiseemissionoftonalcharacteristicswherethedifferencebetween-
(a) theA-weightedsoundpressurelevelinanyone-thirdoctaveband;and
(b) thearithmeticaverageoftheA-weightedsoundpressurelevels inthe2adjacentone-thirdoctavebands,
is greater than 3 dB when the sound pressure levels are determined as LAeq,T levels where the timeperiodTisgreaterthan10%oftherepresentativeassessmentperiod,orgreaterthan8dBatanytimewhenthesoundpressurelevelsaredeterminedasLASlowlevels.
Thisisrelativelycommoninmostnoisesources.
ModulatingNoiseAmodulatingsourceisregular,cyclicandaudibleandispresentforatleast10%ofthemeasurementperiod.Thequantitativedefinitionofmodulationis:
avariationintheemissionofnoisethat—
(a) ismorethan3dBLAFastorismorethan3dBLAFastinanyone-thirdoctaveband;
(b) ispresentforatleast10%oftherepresentative.
50
Lloyd George Acoustics
Reference:18084580-01.docx PageA3
ImpulsiveNoiseAn impulsive noise source has a short-term banging, clunking or explosive sound. The quantitativedefinitionofimpulsivenessis:
avariationintheemissionofanoisewherethedifferencebetweenLApeakandLAMaxslowismorethan15dBwhendeterminedforasinglerepresentativeevent;
MajorRoadIsaroadwithanestimatedaveragedailytrafficcountofmorethan15,000vehicles.
Secondary/MinorRoadIsaroadwithanestimatedaveragedailytrafficcountofbetween6,000and15,000vehicles.
InfluencingFactor(IF)
( ) ( )
100m within roadmajor each for 6450m within roadmajor each for 2
100m within roadsecondary each for 2 dB) 6 of (maximumFactor Traffic
noise thereceiving premises theof radius 450m a within land commercial of percentage the%TypeB
noise thereceiving premises theof radius a100m within land commercial of percentage theB Type %
noise thereceiving premises theof radius 450m a within land industrial of percentage the%TypeA
noise thereceiving premises theof radius a100m withinland industrial of percentage theA Type %
:
B Type %B Type %201A Type %A Type %
101
450
100
450
100
450100450100
=
=
=
+
=
=
=
=
+++=
where
RepresentativeAssessmentPeriodMeans a period of time not less than 15 minutes, and not exceeding four hours, determined by aninspector or authorised person to be appropriate for the assessment of a noise emission, havingregardtothetypeandnatureofthenoiseemission.
BackgroundNoiseBackgroundnoiseorresidualnoise isthenoise levelfromsourcesotherthanthesourceofconcern.When measuring environmental noise, residual sound is often a problem. One reason is thatregulationsoftenrequirethatthenoisefromdifferenttypesofsourcesbedealtwithseparately.Thisseparation, e.g. of traffic noise from industrial noise, is often difficult to accomplish in practice.Another reason is that the measurements are normally carried out outdoors. Wind-induced noise,directly on the microphone and indirectly on trees, buildings, etc., may also affect the result. Thecharacterofthesenoisesourcescanmakeitdifficultorevenimpossibletocarryoutanycorrections.
AmbientNoiseMeans the level of noise from all sources, including background noise from near and far and thesourceofinterest.
SpecificNoiseRelatestothecomponentoftheambientnoisethatisofinterest.Thiscanbereferredtoasthenoiseofconcernorthenoiseofinterest.
51
Lloyd George Acoustics
Reference:18084580-01.docx PageA4
ChartofNoiseLevelDescriptors
TypicalNoiseLevels
52
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1-2
APPENDIX C
Bushfire Management Plan
53
54
Bushfire Management Plan(Development Application)
Gilgara RetreatLot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River
Shire of Augusta - Margaret River
Job Number: 181016
Assessment Date: 15 January 2019
Report Date: 1 February 2019
55
BPP Group Pty Ltd t/a Bushfire Prone PlanningABN: 39 166 551 784
Level 1, 159-161 James StreetGuildford WA 6055
PO Box 388Guildford WA 6935
Ph: 08 6477 1144Email: [email protected]
Commercial in Confidence
The information, including any intellectual property, contained in this document is confidential andproprietary to the Company. It may only be used by the person to whom it is provided for the stated purposefor which it is provided and must not be imparted to any third person without the prior written approval ofthe Company. The Company reserves all legal rights and remedies in respect of its confidential information.
Copyright ©2019 BPP Group Pty Ltd
All intellectual property rights, including copyright, in format and proprietary content contained in documentscreated by Bushfire Prone Planning, remain the property of BPP Group Pty Ltd. Any use made of such formator content without the prior written approval of Bushfire Prone Planning, will constitute an infringement onthe rights of the Company which reserves all legal rights and remedies in respect of any such infringement.
Disclaimer
The measures contained in this Bushfire Management Plan are considered to be minimum standards and theydo not guarantee that a building will not be damaged in a bushfire, persons injured, or fatalities occur eitheron the subject site or off the site while evacuating. This is substantially due to the unpredictable nature andbehaviour of fire and extreme weather conditions. Additionally, the correct implementation of the requiredbushfire protection measures (and any associated response/evacuation plan if applicable) will depend, amongother things, on the actions of the landowners or occupiers over which Bushfire Prone Planning has no control.
All surveys, forecasts, projections and recommendations made in this report associated with the project aremade in good faith based on information available to Bushfire Prone Planning at the time.
All maps included herein are indicative in nature and are not to be used for accurate calculations.
Notwithstanding anything contained therein, Bushfire Prone Planning will not, except as the law may require,be liable for any loss or other consequences whether or not due to the negligence of their consultants, theirservants or agents - arising out of the services provided by their consultants.
56
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 1
Document Control
Version Version Details Date Submitted
1.0 Original Document 1-Feb-19
Co - Author Accreditation Signature
Mick Whitelaw BPAD Level 2 - No. 37265
Co - Author
Jason Benson BPAD Level 1 - No. 37893
Co - Author
Mike Scott BPAD Level 3 - No. 27795
Document Content Compliance Statement
This Bushfire Management Plan (the Plan) provides the required information to address State Planning PolicyNo. 3.7: Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas - December 2015 (SPP 3.7), the associated Guidelines for Planning inBushfire Prone Areas - WAPC 2017 v1.3 (Guidelines), and any additional information as directed by the WAPlanning Commission (WA Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage). It is fit for accompanying a planningapplication.
Structure Plan / Subdivision BMP Template v7.3
57
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 2
Table of Contents
DOCUMENT CONTROL.............................................................................................................................................1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................................3
1 THE PROPOSAL AND PURPOSE OF THE PLAN .................................................................................................4
DETAILS ....................................................................................................................................................4
EXISTING DOCUMENTATION RELEVANT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PLAN ......................................................8
VULNERABLE LAND USE ...............................................................................................................................9
2 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ...........................................................................................................10
NATIVE VEGETATION – MODIFICATION AND CLEARING ...................................................................................10
RE-VEGETATION / RETAINED VEGETATION / LANDSCAPE PLANS .......................................................................11
3 POTENTIAL BUSHFIRE IMPACT ASSESSMENT ...............................................................................................12
ASSESSMENT INPUT ..................................................................................................................................12
3.1.1 Fire Danger Index (FDI) Applied.......................................................................................................12
3.1.2 Existing Vegetation Identification, Classification and Effective Slope.............................................12
ASSESSMENT OUTPUT ...............................................................................................................................19
3.2.1 Indicative BAL Results Presented as a BAL Contour Map................................................................19
3.2.2 Bushfire Attack Levels (BAL) Derived from The Contour Map.........................................................22
4 IDENTIFICATION OF BUSHFIRE HAZARD ISSUES ...........................................................................................24
5 ASSESSMENT AGAINST THE BUSHFIRE PROTECTION CRITERIA (BPC) ..........................................................25
BUSHFIRE PROTECTION CRITERIA - ASSESSMENT SUMMARY.............................................................................25
BUSHFIRE PROTECTION CRITERIA – ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS ASSESSMENT DETAIL ..............................................26
5.2.1 Element 1: Location .........................................................................................................................26
5.2.2 Element 2: Siting and Design of Development ................................................................................26
5.2.3 Element 3: Vehicular Access ............................................................................................................27
5.2.4 Element 4: Water.............................................................................................................................28
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR REQUIRED BUSHFIRE PROTECTION MEASURES ..................................................29
STATE GOVERNMENT VARIATIONS TO APPLY .................................................................................................30
BUSHFIRE RESPONSE/EVACUATION ADVICE – RISK ANALYSIS ...........................................................................31
6 RESPONSIBILITIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE BUSHFIRE PROTECTIONMEASURES.............................................................................................................................................................33
APPENDIX 1 - ONSITE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS...............................................35
APPENDIX 2 - VEHICULAR ACCESS TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS...........................................................................40
APPENDIX 3 - WATER TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS...............................................................................................42
58
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 3
Executive Summary
This Bushfire Management Plan (the Plan) has been prepared to accompany the Development Application
(Proposed Scheme Amendment – AMR Town Planning Scheme 1) for Gilgara Retreat - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook
Road, Margaret River. (No new construction)
The current ‘Chalet and Camping’ zoning of the site currently does not permit the operation of the ‘Reception
Centre’ on the subject site. The proposed Scheme Amendment therefore seeks to incorporate the ‘Reception
Centre’ as an ‘Additional Use’ under Schedule 2 of the Scheme over the subject site.
The development site of approximately 9.1 hectares is within a designated bushfire prone area and the Proposal
requires the application of State Planning Policy No. 3.7: Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas (SPP 3.7). The assessed
bushfire risk is considered to be manageable and will be achieved by the identified stakeholders implementing
and maintaining the bushfire risk management measures that are presented in this Plan. Assessment of the
planned location, vegetation and consideration of existing infrastructure indicates that compliance is able to be
achieved against all applicable bushfire related legislation, policy, standards and guidelines, including the
Bushfire Protection Criteria.
Against the Bushfire Protection Criteria, the decision maker’s assessment of this Proposal is to be on the basis
of:
For Element 1 ‘Location’, the Proposal is able to achieve the acceptable solution (by being subject to
BAL-29 or less);
For Element 2 ‘Siting and Design’ the Proposal is able to achieve the acceptable solution (by installing
an Asset Protection Zone compliant with a BAL Rating of BAL-29 or less);
For Element 3 ‘Vehicular Access’, the site is provided with suitable vehicle access and egress;
For Element 4 ‘Water’, the Proposal is able to achieve the acceptable solution (it will be able to provide
the specified water supply for firefighting).
A Bushfire Evacuation (Response) Plan for the site, with specific consideration to the management of a bushfire
emergency has been prepared as a separate document. The evacuation response plan has given due
consideration to the vehicle access/egress options for the proposed development and precautionary measures
have been incorporated into the plan to minimise risk to the future occupants.
59
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 4
1 The Proposal and Purpose of the Plan
Details
Landowner / Proponent: Agefame Pty Ltd
Site Address: Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (Gilgara Retreat)
Local Government: Shire of Augusta - Margaret River
Site Area: 9.1 Hectares
Development Type: Scheme Amendment – Rezoning Application – Addition to land use
Overview of the Proposal:
The application is for a scheme amendment to rezone the property to permit an additional use in the formof a reception centre to accommodate weddings at the venue.
Bushfire Prone PlanningCommissioned toProduce the Plan by:
RPS Group
For Submission to: Shire of Augusta - Margaret River
Table 1.1: Proposal Details
Existing Infrastructure
Building # Structure Type
1 2 Chalets
2 2 Chalets
3 2 Chalets
4 2 Chalets
5 1 Homestead (Lodge & Barn)
Proposed Temporary Structures
Structures # Structure Type
6 Ceremony Location (Tent)
7 Reception Centre (Marquee)
60
Chk'd By.
CLIENT
Scale
not permitted. Please contact the author.
Unauthorised reproduction or amendment
COPYRIGHT PROTECTS THIS PLANC
+61 8 9211 1111
+61 8 9211 1122
West Perth WA 6872
West Perth WA 6005
PO Box 170
ACN 140 292 762
ABN 44 140 292 762
T
F
W
RPS Australia East Pty Ltd
rpsgroup.com.au
Sheet
Level 2, 27-31 Troode Street
Plan Ref Rev
PROJECT
Local Authority.
Comp By. DWG Name.
Locality.
Date.Job Ref.
AGEFAME PTY LTDGILGARA RETREAT
LOT 5 OLD ELLEN BROOK ROAD LAYOUT PLAN
13 JUNE 2018
MARGARET RIVER
140773-1
N.T.S A3 132985-b-008 -
61
+R
CAVES
RD
OLD ELLEN BROOK RD
57
43 62
1
Landgate / SLIP
____________ LEGEND ____________
Lot 5
BuildingsExisting Homestead
Existing Chalets
Ceremony Location
Reception Marquee
+R Existing Firefighting Water Tank
0 10 20 30 40 50
Metres
____________ SCALE (A3) ____________
Disclaimer and Limitation: This map has been prepared for bushfire management planning purposes only. All depicted areas, contours and any dimensions shown are subject to survey. Bushfire Prone Planning does not guarantee that this map is without flaw of any kind and disclaims all liability for any errors, loss or other consequence which may arise from relying on any information depicted.
Map created on: 22/01/2019
B R A M L E YB R A M L E Y
C O W A R A M U PC O W A R A M U P
B U R N S I D EB U R N S I D E
M A R G A R E TM A R G A R E TR I V E RR I V E R
COWARAMUPEAST
MARGARETRIVER
GRACETOWN
PREVELLY
COWARAMUP
__________ LOCALITY __________
p
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook RoadMargaret River
Aerial Image: Landgate 2018
Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50Projection: Universal Transverse Mercator
Map compiled by: Mick Whitelaw
Figure 1.1Proposed Development
62
+R
OLD ELLEN BROOK RD
CAVES
RD
7 5
4
3 6
2
1
Landgate / SLIP
____________ LEGEND ____________
Lot 5
BuildingsExisting Homestead
Existing Chalets
Ceremony Location
Reception Marquee
+R Existing Firefighting Water Tank
0 10 20 30 40 50
Metres
____________ SCALE (A3) ____________
Disclaimer and Limitation: This map has been prepared for bushfire management planning purposes only. All depicted areas, contours and any dimensions shown are subject to survey. Bushfire Prone Planning does not guarantee that this map is without flaw of any kind and disclaims all liability for any errors, loss or other consequence which may arise from relying on any information depicted.
Map created on: 22/01/2019
B R A M L E YB R A M L E Y
C O W A R A M U PC O W A R A M U P
B U R N S I D EB U R N S I D E
M A R G A R E TM A R G A R E TR I V E RR I V E R
COWARAMUPEAST
MARGARETRIVER
GRACETOWN
PREVELLY
COWARAMUP
__________ LOCALITY __________
p
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook RoadMargaret River
Aerial Image: Landgate 2018
Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50Projection: Universal Transverse Mercator
Map compiled by: Mick Whitelaw
Figure 1.2Proposed Development
63
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 8
Existing Documentation Relevant to the Construction of this Plan
This section acknowledges any known reports or plans that have been prepared for previous planningstages, that refer to the subject area and that may or will impact upon the assessment of bushfire risk and/orthe implementation of bushfire protection measures and will be referenced in this Bushfire ManagementPlan.
.
Relevant Documents
Existing DocumentCopy
ProvidedTitle
Planning Approval (P27363)(November 2007)
YesDevelopment Application Approval
Lot 5 Old Ellen Brook Rd, Margaret River(Shire of AMR)
Planning Application(June 2018)
YesIn Principle amendment for an “Additional Use – Reception
Centre - Lot 5 Old Ellen Brook , Margaret River(RPS Group)
Layout Plan(June 2018)
YesGilgara Retreat – Basic Site Plan
(RPS Group)
In Principle Scheme Amendment(P218413) (December 2018)
YesIn Principle Scheme Amendment
3 (Lot 5) Old Ellen Brook , Margaret River(Shire of AMR)
64
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 9
Vulnerable Land Use
Definition and Application
A ‘vulnerable land use’ is defined as “a land use where persons may be less able to respond in a bushfire
emergency”. The Guidelines provide examples of what constitutes a vulnerable land use.
Information, additional to the Bushfire Management Plan, is required to accompany applications involving a
vulnerable land use.
Required Additional Information – Emergency Evacuation
Development applications for a vulnerable land use are to provide actionable information for persons that
will occupy or visit that site with respect to their preparedness, awareness and response to a bushfire
potentially impacting the property. The development application must:
1. Include an emergency evacuation plan for proposed occupants;
2. Subdivision applications, scheme amendments or structure plans “should make provision for
emergency evacuation”.
(Source: State Planning Policy No. 3.7: Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas - December 2015 (SPP 3.7) s7 and
pm6.6 and Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas - WAPC 2017 v1.3 (Guidelines) s5.4 and s5.5.
Determination of Vulnerable Land Use - Category Applied
It has been determined that the proposed amendment identifies a site for a ‘vulnerable land use’ based on
fitting the following category of future land use.
Category 3: Short stay accommodation or visitation uses that involve people who are unaware
of their surroundings and who may require assistance or direction in the event of a bushfire.
The proponent is seeking approval for an additional use in the form of a reception centre to accommodate
weddings at the venue.
Required Additional Information and its Location
A detailed and site-specific Bushfire Response/Evacuation Plan
for occupants. Provided as a separate
document to accompany
the planning application
Create a responsibility for the landowner/occupier to inform
occupants of the existence and application of either the Bushfire
Response/Evacuation Plan or the bushfire response/evacuation
advice provided.
Within Section 6
65
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 10
2 Environmental Considerations
Native Vegetation – Modification and Clearing
‘Guidelines’ s2.3: “Many bushfire prone areas also have high biodiversity values. SPP 3.7 policy objective 5.4
recognises the need to consider bushfire risk management measures alongside environmental, biodiversity
and conservation values.”
Existing conservation areas that are potentially affected by the development proposal are required to be
identified. This may result in vegetation removal/modification prohibition or limitations. These areas include
National Parks, Nature Reserves, Wetlands and Bush Forever sites.
Environmental Protection Act 1986: “Clearing of native vegetation in Western Australia requires a clearing
permit under Part V, Division 2 of the Act unless clearing is for an exempt purpose. Exemptions from requiring
a clearing permit are contained in Schedule 6 of the Act or are prescribed in the Environmental Protection
Regulations” (‘Guidelines’ s2.3).
The Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act): This Act administered by
the Australian Government Department of Environment, provides a national scheme of environment and
heritage protection and biodiversity conservation. Nationally threatened species and ecological communities
are a specific matter of significance. Areas of vegetation can be classified as a Threatened Ecological
Community (TEC) under the EPBC Act and consequently have removal restrictions imposed.
.
Vegetation Modification and Clearing Assessment
Will on-site clearing of native vegetation be required? Yes (Minor)
Does this have the potential to trigger environmental impact/referral
requirements under State and Federal environmental legislation?Unaware
For the proposed development site, have any areas of native vegetation
been identified as species that might result in the classification of the area
as a Threatened Ecological Community (TEC)?
Unaware
Vegetation Area 1 (Woodland) will require modification to establish an Asset Protection Zone of the required
dimensions (Figure 3.1.1) - to ensure that the potential radiant heat from a bushfire impacting existing buildings,
does not exceed 29 kW/m2. Any proposed vegetation removal may be subject to local government approval,
dependent on the lot’s specific situation with respect to identified environmental protection areas. The bushfire
assessment and management strategies contained in the BMP, assume that environmental approval will be
achieved or clearing permit exemptions will apply.
Recommendation: It is advised that the proponent seek further advice from an Environmental Consultant or the
WA Department of Parks and Wildlife for further information on the condition and species contained within the
proposed development area and the requirement for referral of the proposal.
66
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 11
Development Design Options
Establishing development in bushfire prone areas can adversely affect the retention of native vegetation
through clearing associated with the creation Lots and/or Asset Protection Zones. Where loss of vegetation
is not acceptable or causes conflict with landscape or environmental objectives, it will be necessary to
consider available design options to minimise the removal of native vegetation.
.
Minimising the Removal of Native Vegetation
Design Option Identified Adopted
Reduction of lot yield N/A N/A
Cluster development N/A N/A
Impact on Adjoining Land
Is this planning proposal able to implement the required bushfire measures within the
boundaries of the land being developed so as not to impact on the bushfire and
environmental management of neighbouring reserves, properties or conservation
covenants?
Yes
Re-vegetation / Retained Vegetation / Landscape Plans
Riparian zones, wetland/foreshore buffers, road verges and public open space may have plans to re-vegetate
or retain vegetation as part of the Proposal.
Vegetation corridors may join offsite vegetation and provide a route for fire to enter a development area.
When applicable, any such area will be identified in this Bushfire Management Plan and their impact on the
assessment and future management accounted for.
Is re-vegetation of riparian zones and/or wetland or foreshore buffers and/or public
open space a part of this Proposal?No
Is the requirement for ongoing maintenance of existing vegetation in riparian zones
and/or wetland or foreshore buffers and/or public open space a part of this Proposal?No
67
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 12
3 Potential Bushfire Impact Assessment
Assessment Input
3.1.1 Fire Danger Index (FDI) Applied
AS 3959-2009 specifies the fire danger index values to apply for different regions as per Table 2.1. The values
used in the model calculations are for the Forest Fire Danger Index (FFDI) and for which equivalent
representative values of the Grassland Fire Danger Index (GFDI) are applied as per Appendix B. The values
can be refined if appropriately justified.
Table 3.1: Applied FDI Value
FDI Value
Vegetation AreaAs per AS 3959 - 2009
Table 2.1As per DFES for the
LocationValue Applied
1-6 80 N/A 80
3.1.2 Existing Vegetation Identification, Classification and Effective Slope
Vegetation identification and classification has been conducted in accordance with AS 3959-2009 s2.2.3 and
the Visual Guide for Bushfire Risk Assessment in WA (DoP February 2016).
When more than one vegetation type is present, each type is identified separately with the worst-case
scenario being applied as the classification. The predominant vegetation is not necessarily the worst-case
scenario.
The vegetation structure has been assessed as it will be in its mature state (rather than what might be
observed on the day). Areas of modified vegetation are assessed as they will be in their natural unmodified
state (unless maintained in a permanently low threat, minimal fuel condition, satisfying AS 3959-2009
s2.2.3.2-f and asset protection zone standards). Vegetation destroyed or damaged by a bushfire or other
natural disaster has been assessed on its revegetated mature state.
Effective Slope: Is the ground slope under the classified vegetation and is determined for each area of
classified vegetation. It is the measured or determined slope which will most significantly influence the
bushfire behaviour in that vegetation as it approaches a building or site. Where there is a significant change
in effective ground slope under an area of classified vegetation, that will cause a change in fire behaviour,
separate vegetation areas will be identified, based on the change in effective slope, to enable the correct
assessment.
68
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 13
Table 3.1.2: Vegetation identification and classification
All Vegetation Within 150 metres of the Proposed Development
Vegetation
Area
Identified Types (AS3959) or Description if
‘Excluded’Applied Classification
Effective Slope
Under
Classified
Vegetation
(degrees)
1 Open Woodland (B-05) - (Onsite) Class B Woodland 0
2 Open Woodland (B-05) - (Onsite) Class B Woodland 0
3 Sown Pasture (G-26) - (Onsite) Class G Grassland 0
4 Open Woodland (B-05) Class B Woodland 0-5
5 Open Forest (A-04) Class A Forest 0
6 Sown Pasture (G-26) Class G Grassland 0
7Excluded – Managed Areas
(Buildings / Roads / non-vegetated areas)
Excluded AS3959-2009
2.2.3.2 (e)(f)-
Representative photos of each vegetation area, descriptions and classification justification, are presented onthe following pages. The areas of classified vegetation are defined, and the photo locations identified on thetopography and classified vegetation map, Figure 3.1.
Note1: As per AS 3959-2009 Table 2.3 and Figures 2.3 and 2.4 a-gNote2: As per AS 3959-2009 Table 2.3.
*This assessment is reliant on the surrounding land (Area 7) being maintained in a low fuel condition as per theShire of AMR Firebreak Notice, reflecting the state of the vegetation at the time of the assessment.
69
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 14
Vegetation Area 1 Classification Applied: Class B Woodland
Classification Justification: Mixed Eucalyptus species (planted trees), minimal understory consisting of grassand limited ground fuels.
Photo ID: 1a Photo ID: 1b
Vegetation Area 2 Classification Applied: Class B Woodland
Classification Justification: Mix of Eucalyptus trees (planted), Areas with dense canopy (>50%) no understory.
Photo ID: 2a Photo ID: 2b
Vegetation Area 3 Classification Applied: Class G Grassland
Classification Justification: Paddock / Pasture - Grassland
Photo ID: 3a Photo ID: 3b
70
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 15
Vegetation Area 4 Classification Applied: Class B Woodland
Classification Justification: Eucalypt Woodland (Roadside vegetation), dense canopy with limited understory.
Photo ID: 4a Photo ID: 4b
Vegetation Area 5 Classification Applied: Class A Forest
Classification Justification: Open Eucalyptus Forest, Canopy >50% with Scrub understory (unmanagedRoadside vegetation – Caves Road)
Photo ID: 5a Photo ID: 5b
Vegetation Area 6 Classification Applied: Class G Grassland
Classification Justification: Paddock / Pasture – Grassland (Background)
Photo ID: 6a Photo ID: 6b
71
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 16
Vegetation Area 7 Classification Applied: Excluded AS3959-2009 2.2.3.2 (e)(f)
Classification Justification: Excluded – Low threat vegetation and non-vegetated areas (existing buildings)
Photo ID: 7a Photo ID: 7b
Vegetation Area 7 Classification Applied: Excluded AS3959-2009 2.2.3.2 (e)(f)
Classification Justification: Excluded – Low threat vegetation and non-vegetated areas (Reticulated Grassland)
Photo ID: 7c Photo ID: 7d
72
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
! !
!!
! !
!!
!!
! !
+RAREA : 3
Class (G) GrasslandEffective slope: 0 o
AREA : 5Class (A) Forest
Effective slope: 0 o AREA : 6Class (G) GrasslandEffective slope: 0 o
AREA : 1Class (B) WoodlandEffective slope: 0 o
AREA : 2Class (B) WoodlandEffective slope: 0 o
AREA : 7LOW THREAT :Managed Vegetation
Exclusion AS 3959-2009 s2 c2.2.3.2(e)(f)
AREA : 4Class (B) Woodland
Effective slope: >0 o to 5 o
OLD ELLEN BROOK RD
CAVES
RD
6655 mm
6600 mm
65 m65 m
5555 mm
6600 mm
5555 mm
45 m45 m50 m50 m
3a
5a
6a
3b
1a 7a5b
6b7b
1b
2a
7d
7c
2b
4a
4b
7 5
43 6
21
Landgate / SLIP
____________ LEGEND ____________
Lot 5
BuildingsExisting Homestead
Existing Chalets
Ceremony Location
Reception Marquee
Area of Interest - 150m extent
!!
Photo Locations
+R Existing Firefighting Water Tank
Classified VegetationClass (A) Forest
Class (B) Woodland
à Class (G) Grassland
M M
M M Managed - Min. Fuel
0 10 20 30 40 50
Metres
____________ SCALE (A3) ____________
Disclaimer and Limitation: This map has been prepared for bushfire management planning purposes only. All depicted areas, contours and any dimensions shown are subject to survey. Bushfire Prone Planning does not guarantee that this map is without flaw of any kind and disclaims all liability for any errors, loss or other consequence which may arise from relying on any information depicted.
Map created on: 22/01/2019
B R A M L E YB R A M L E Y
C O W A R A M U PC O W A R A M U P
B U R N S I D EB U R N S I D E
M A R G A R E TM A R G A R E TR I V E RR I V E R
COWARAMUP EAST
MARGARETRIVER
GRACETOWN
PREVELLY
COWARAMUP
__________ LOCALITY __________
p
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook RoadMargaret River
Aerial Image: Landgate 2018
Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50Projection: Universal Transverse Mercator
Map compiled by: Mick Whitelaw
Topography &Classified Vegetation
Figure 3.1
73
AREA : 6Class (G) GrasslandEffective slope: 0 o
AREA : 3Class (G) GrasslandEffective slope: 0 o
AREA : 1Class (B) WoodlandEffective slope: 0 o
AREA : 7LOW THREAT :Managed Vegetation
Exclusion AS 3959-2009 s2 c2.2.3.2(e)(f)
AREA : 5Class (A) Forest
Effective slope: 0 o
AREA : 2Class (B) WoodlandEffective slope: 0 o
AREA : 4Class (B) Woodland
Effective slope: >0 o to 5 o
CAVE
S RD
OLD ELLEN BROOK RD
7 5
4
36
2
1
Landgate / SLIP
____________ LEGEND ____________
Lot 5
BuildingsExisting Homestead
Existing Chalets
Ceremony Location
Reception Marquee
Asset Protection Zone - (BAL-29)
Area of Interest - 150m extent
Proposed Vegetation Modification
Classified VegetationClass (A) Forest
Class (B) Woodlandà Class (G) Grassland
M M
M M Managed - Min. Fuel
0 10 20 30 40 50
Metres
____________ SCALE (A3) ____________
Disclaimer and Limitation: This map has been prepared for bushfire management planning purposes only. All depicted areas, contours and any dimensions shown are subject to survey. Bushfire Prone Planning does not guarantee that this map is without flaw of any kind and disclaims all liability for any errors, loss or other consequence which may arise from relying on any information depicted.
Map created on: 22/01/2019
B R A M L E YB R A M L E Y
C O W A R A M U PC O W A R A M U P
B U R N S I D EB U R N S I D E
M A R G A R E TM A R G A R E TR I V E RR I V E R
COWARAMUPEAST
MARGARETRIVER
GRACETOWN
PREVELLY
COWARAMUP
__________ LOCALITY __________
p
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook RoadMargaret River
Aerial Image: Landgate 2018
Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50Projection: Universal Transverse Mercator
Map compiled by: Mick Whitelaw
Topography &Classified Vegetation
Figure 3.1.1
74
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 19
Assessment Output
3.2.1 Indicative BAL Results Presented as a BAL Contour Map
Interpretation of the Bushfire Attack Level (BAL) Contour Map
The contour map will present different coloured contour intervals constructed around the classified bushfire
prone vegetation. These represent the different Bushfire Attack Levels that exist at varying distances away
from the classified vegetation.
Each BAL represents a set range of radiant heat flux (as defined by AS 3959-2009) that can be generated by the
bushfire in that vegetation at that location.
The width of each shaded contour (i.e. the distance interval) will vary and is determined by consideration of
variables including vegetation type, fuel structure, ground slope, climatic conditions. They are unique to a site
and can vary across a site. The width of each contour is a diagrammatic expression of the separation distances
from the classified vegetation that apply for each BAL rating, for that site.
A building (or ‘area’) located within any given BAL contour will be subject to that BAL rating and potentially
multiple BAL ratings of which the highest rating will be applied.
Table 3.2.1: Vegetation separation distances applied to construct the BAL contours.
Derived Vegetation Separation Distances
Ve
geta
tio
n
Are
a VegetationClassification
Effe
ctiv
eSl
op
e
(de
gre
es) BAL
AssessmentMethodApplied1
BAL Rating and Corresponding Separation Distance(metres)
BAL-FZ BAL-40 BAL-29 BAL-19 BAL12.5
1Class B
Woodland0 Method 1 <10 10-<14 14-<20 20-<29 29-<100
2Class B
Woodland0 Method 1 <10 10-<14 14-<20 20-<29 29-<100
3Class G
Grassland0 Method 1 <6 6-<8 8-<12 12-<17 17-<50
4Class B
Woodland0-5 Method 1 <13 13-<17 17-<25 25-<35 35-<100
5 Class A Forest 0 Method 1 <16 16-<21 21-<31 31-<42 42-<100
6Class G
Grassland0 Method 1 <6 6-<8 8-<12 12-<17 17-<50
Method 1 as per AS 3959-2009 Table 2.4.3. The input variables applied, other than the calculation model
defaults, are presented in Section 3.1 of this Plan.
75
+RAREA : 3
Class (G) GrasslandEffective slope: 0 o
AREA : 5Class (A) Forest
Effective slope: 0 o AREA : 6Class (G) GrasslandEffective slope: 0 o
AREA : 1Class (B) WoodlandEffective slope: 0 o
AREA : 2Class (B) WoodlandEffective slope: 0 o
AREA : 7LOW THREAT :Managed Vegetation
Exclusion AS 3959-2009 s2 c2.2.3.2(e)(f)
AREA : 4Class (B) Woodland
Effective slope: >0 o to 5 o
OLD ELLEN BROOK RD
CAVES
RD
7 5
34
62
1
Landgate / SLIP
____________ LEGEND ____________
Lot 5
BuildingsExisting Homestead
Existing Chalets
Ceremony Location
Reception Marquee
Area of Interest - 150m extent
+R Existing Firefighting Water Tank
Vegetation Extent
Bushfire Attack Levels (Method 1)BAL FZ (Indicative only)
BAL 40 (Indicative only)
BAL 29 (Indicative only)
BAL 19 (Indicative only)
BAL 12.5 (Indicative only)
0 10 20 30 40 50
Metres
____________ SCALE (A3) ____________
Disclaimer and Limitation: This map has been prepared for bushfire management planning purposes only. All depicted areas, contours and any dimensions shown are subject to survey. Bushfire Prone Planning does not guarantee that this map is without flaw of any kind and disclaims all liability for any errors, loss or other consequence which may arise from relying on any information depicted.
Map created on: 23/01/2019
B R A M L E YB R A M L E Y
C O W A R A M U PC O W A R A M U P
B U R N S I D EB U R N S I D E
M A R G A R E TM A R G A R E TR I V E RR I V E R
COWARAMUP EAST
MARGARETRIVER
GRACETOWN
PREVELLY
COWARAMUP
__________ LOCALITY __________
p
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook RoadMargaret River
Aerial Image: Landgate 2018
Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50Projection: Universal Transverse Mercator
Map compiled by: Mick Whitelaw
Figure 3.2Indicative BAL Contour Map
76
CAVE
S RD
OLD ELLEN BROOK RD
7 5
3
4
6
2
1
Landgate / SLIP
____________ LEGEND ____________
Lot 5
BuildingsExisting Homestead
Existing Chalets
Ceremony Location
Reception Marquee
Area of Interest - 150m extent
Vegetation Extent
Bushfire Attack Levels (Method 1)BAL FZ (Indicative only)
BAL 40 (Indicative only)
BAL 29 (Indicative only)
BAL 19 (Indicative only)
BAL 12.5 (Indicative only)
0 10 20 30 40 50
Metres
____________ SCALE (A3) ____________
Disclaimer and Limitation: This map has been prepared for bushfire management planning purposes only. All depicted areas, contours and any dimensions shown are subject to survey. Bushfire Prone Planning does not guarantee that this map is without flaw of any kind and disclaims all liability for any errors, loss or other consequence which may arise from relying on any information depicted.
Map created on: 23/01/2019
B R A M L E YB R A M L E Y
C O W A R A M U PC O W A R A M U P
B U R N S I D EB U R N S I D E
M A R G A R E TM A R G A R E TR I V E RR I V E R
COWARAMUPEAST
MARGARETRIVER
GRACETOWN
PREVELLY
COWARAMUP
__________ LOCALITY __________
p
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook RoadMargaret River
Aerial Image: Landgate 2018
Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50Projection: Universal Transverse Mercator
Map compiled by: Mick Whitelaw
Figure 3.2.1Indicative BAL Contour Map
77
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 22
3.2.2 Bushfire Attack Levels (BAL) Derived from The Contour Map
Deriving a BAL Rating from the BAL Contour Map Data
The BAL Rating is Assessed as Indicative
If the assessed BAL for the ‘area’ is stated as being ‘indicative’, it is because that ‘area’ is impacted by more
than one BAL contour interval and/or classifiable vegetation remains on the lot, or on adjacent lots, that can
influence a future building’s BAL rating (and this vegetation may have been omitted from being contoured for
planning purposes e.g. Grassland or when the assumption is made that all onsite vegetation can be removed
and/or modified).
The BAL rating that will apply to any future building within that ‘area’ will be dependent on:
1. vegetation management onsite; and/or
2. vegetation remaining on adjacent lots; and/or
3. the actual location of the future building within that ‘area’.
The required confirmation of the BAL rating must be done by a bushfire practitioner with the same level ofaccreditation as has been required to compile this Bushfire Management Plan.
The BAL Rating is Assessed as Determined
If the assessed BAL for the lot or envelope is stated as being ‘determined’ it is because that lot or envelope is
impacted by a single BAL contour interval. This BAL has been determined by the existence (or non-existence)
of classified vegetation outside the lot or envelope, and no classifiable vegetation currently exists on the lot or
envelope (i.e. it has been cleared to a minimal fuel, low bushfire threat state). In the situation where the BAL
Contour Map has been constructed around multiple lots, there also needs to no classifiable vegetation on an
adjacent lot if this vegetation has not already been incorporated into the creation of the BAL Contour Map.
As a result, a determined BAL can be provided in this limited situation because:
1. No classified vegetation is required to be removed or modified to achieve the determined BAL, either
within the lot/envelope or on adjacent lots (or if vegetation is excluded from classification, it is
reasonable to assume it will be maintained in this state into the future); and
2. A future building can be located anywhere within the ‘site’ and be subject to the determined BAL rating;
and
3. The degree of certainty is more than sufficient to allow for any small discrepancy that might occur in
the mapping of the BAL contours.
78
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 23
Table 3.2.2: Indicative Bushfire Attack Levels for the Existing Buildings
Indicative Bushfire Attack Levels for the Existing Buildings
Relevant Fire Danger Index (AS3959-2009 Table 2.1) 80
BAL Determination MethodMethod 1 as per AS 3959-2009 s2.2.6 and Table 2.4.3.
Refer to Appendix 2 this Plan
Building Indicative BAL
1 (Chalet) BAL-29
Table 3.2.3: Determined Bushfire Attack Level for the Existing Buildings
Determined Bushfire Attack Level for the Existing Buildings
Relevant Fire Danger Index (AS3959-2009 Table 2.1) 80
BAL Determination MethodMethod 1 as per AS 3959-2009 s2.2.6 and Table 2.4.3.
Refer to Appendix 2 this Plan
Building Determined BAL
2 (Chalet) BAL-29
3 (Chalet) BAL-29
4 (Chalet) BAL-29
5 (Homestead) BAL-29
Table 3.2.4: Determined Bushfire Attack Level for the Proposed Development Areas
Determined Bushfire Attack Level for the Proposed Development Areas
Relevant Fire Danger Index (AS3959-2009 Table 2.1) 80
BAL Determination MethodMethod 1 as per AS 3959-2009 s2.2.6 and Table 2.4.3.
Refer to Appendix 2 this Plan
Development Area Determined BAL
6 (Reception Marquee) BAL-19
7 (Ceremony Location) BAL-19
79
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 24
4 Identification of Bushfire Hazard Issues
Onsite Vegetation
The key assumption used to facilitate the determining of Bushfire Attack Levels on the Proposed development
site is that vegetation onsite is under the control of the landowner and therefore can be removed or modified
to present a low bushfire threat (Note: any proposed vegetation removal may be subject to local government
approval, dependent on the lot’s specific situation with respect to identified environmental protection areas
and the lot size).
The onsite vegetation within the proposed BAL 29 APZ (Area 1 - Woodland) has been excluded from the BAL
Contour mapping over the Lot as this vegetation will be removed or modified to a low threat state. (Figure 3.1.1
– Proposed Vegetation Modification – Approx. 200m2)
An Indicative BAL 29 APZ has been applied to the existing buildings onsite (Figure 3.1.1 – Asset Protection Zone
(BAL-29)). The majority of the area surrounding the existing buildings is currently managed in a Parkland Cleared
state (Area 7 - Low threat – reticulated and managed grassland). It is expected that in the future this vegetation
will continue to be maintained in a Low threat state as per the AS 3959-2009 s2.2.3.2 requirements and the
Shire of AMR Firebreak Notice.
The proponent has indicated that onsite vegetation maintenance includes: Slashing of entire property, removal
of hangers and other tree branches fallen throughout winter prior to Nov 31st yearly. On a more regular basis
(bi monthly) gardeners attend to hedge, mulch , remove leaves from gutters, trim ivy, vines etc. and remove
vegetation litter from the property. Lawns are mowed fortnightly.
Offsite Vegetation
Vegetation offsite is not within the control of the landowner and therefore the vegetation cannot be removed
or modified. As a result, the BAL impact from these vegetation areas is unable to be reduced.
80
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 25
5 Assessment Against the Bushfire Protection Criteria (BPC)
Bushfire Protection Criteria - Assessment Summary
Summarised Outcome of the Assessment Against the Bushfire Protection Criteria (BPC)
Element
Basis for the Assessment of Achieving the Intent of the Element
Achieves compliance with theElement through meeting
Acceptable Solutions
Achieves compliance with theElement by application of aPerformance Based Solution
Minor orUnavoidableDevelopment
Meets allrelevant
acceptablesolutions
One or morerelevant
AcceptableSolutions are
not fully met. Avariation of the
solution isprovided and
justified.
One or more applicableAcceptable Solutions are not met.A solution is developed with thesummary presented in this Plan inSection 5.5. The supportingdocument presenting BushfireProne Planning’s detailedmethodology is submittedseparately to the decision makers.
The requiredsupportingstatements
are presentedin this Plan.
Location
N/A
Siting and Designof Development
Vehicular Access
Water
The subject Proposal has been assessed against:
1. The requirements established in Appendix 4 of the Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas, WAPC
2017 v1.3 (the ‘Guidelines’). The detail, including technical construction requirements, are found at
https://www.planning.wa.gov.au/8194.aspx.
81
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 26
Bushfire Protection Criteria – Acceptable Solutions Assessment Detail
5.2.1 Element 1: Location
Bushfire Protection Criteria Element 1: LocationAssessment Statements and Bushfire Protection Measures to be Applied
Intent: To ensure that strategic planning proposals, subdivision and development applications are located inareas with the least possible risk of bushfire to facilitate the protection of people, property and infrastructure.
AcceptableSolution:
A1.1:DevelopmentLocation
Method of achieving Elementcompliance and/or the Intent of
the Element:The acceptable solution is fully met.
The proposed development achieves compliance by:
Ensuring the existing buildings and proposed development areas can be located on an area that will be
subject to potential radiant heat from a bushfire not exceeding 29 kW/m2 (i.e. a BAL rating of BAL-29 or
less will apply). This can be achieved by using positioning, design and appropriate vegetation
removal/modification; and
Managing the remaining bushfire risk to an acceptable level by the existence/implementation and
ongoing maintenance of all required bushfire protection measures, as identified within this Plan. These
measures include the requirements for vegetation management, vehicular access and firefighting water
supply.
5.2.2 Element 2: Siting and Design of Development
Bushfire Protection Criteria Element 2: Siting and Design of DevelopmentAssessment Statements and Bushfire Protection Measures to be Applied
Intent: To ensure that the siting and design of development (note: not building/construction design)minimises the level of bushfire impact.
AcceptableSolution:
A2.1:AssetProtection Zone
Method of achieving Elementcompliance and/or the Intent
of the Element:The acceptable solution is fully met.
The proposed development achieves compliance by:
Ensuring the existing buildings and proposed development areas can establish an APZ of therequired dimensions - to ensure that the potential radiant heat from a bushfire to impact thebuildings/areas, does not exceed 29 kW/m2
The APZ/s can be established fully within the lot boundary; and
The landowner/s having the responsibility of continuing to manage the required APZ as low threatvegetation in a minimal fuel state, by maintaining the APZ to the required dimensions and standard,including compliance with the local government’s annual firebreak notice.
This assessment is reliant on the surrounding land (Area 7) being maintained in a low fuel conditionas per the Shire of AMR Firebreak Notice, reflecting the state of the vegetation at the time of theassessment.
82
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 27
5.2.3 Element 3: Vehicular Access
Bushfire Protection Criteria Element 3: Vehicular AccessAssessment Statements and Bushfire Protection Measures to be Applied
Intent: To ensure that the vehicular access serving a subdivision/development is available and safe during abushfire event.
AcceptableSolution:
A3.1:Two accessroutes
Method of achieving Elementcompliance and/or the Intent of the
Element:
The acceptable solution is fullymet.
The Primary access into Lot 5 is on the intersection of Old Ellen Brook Road and Caves Road. Caves Roadprovides options for travel in two different directions.
AcceptableSolution:
A3.2PublicRoad
Method of achieving Elementcompliance and/or the Intent of the
Element:
The acceptable solution is fullymet.
Old Ellen Brook Road and Caves Road meet the technical requirements established by the Guidelines.
AcceptableSolution:
A3.3Cul-de-sacs(including adead-end road)
Method of achieving Elementcompliance and/or the Intent of the
Element:
The acceptable solution is fullymet.
Old Ellen Brook Road is a dead-end road of approximately 1.3km in length. Lot 5 is accessed from theintersection of Old Ellen Brook Road and Caves Road. Caves Road provides options for travel in two differentdirections.
AcceptableSolution:
A3.5: PrivateDriveways
Method of achieving Elementcompliance and/or the Intent of the
Element:
The acceptable solution is fullymet.
The existing private driveway has been constructed in accordance with the technical requirements establishedby the Guidelines.
AcceptableSolution:
A3.8Firebreak Width
Method of achieving Elementcompliance and/or the Intent of the
Element:
The acceptable solution is fullymet.
The existing Lot complies with the requirements of the local government annual firebreak notice issued unders33 of the Bush Fires Act 1954.
83
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 28
5.2.4 Element 4: Water
Bushfire Protection Criteria Element 4: WaterAssessment Statements and Bushfire Protection Measures to be Applied
Intent: To ensure water is available to the subdivision, development or land use to enable people, property andinfrastructure to be defended from bushfire.
AcceptableSolution:
A4.3Non-reticulated Areas(Individual Lots)
Method of achieving Elementcompliance and/or the Intent of
the Element:
The acceptable solution will befully met in the future (at a laterplanning stage).
A dedicated static water supply was located on Lot with capacity of >10,000 litres. (See Figure 3.1.1) Minor vehicleaccess upgrades (turnarounds) and bushfire specific couplings will be installed. The technical requirementsestablished by the Guidelines and/or the local government can and will be complied with.
84
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 29
Additional Information for Required Bushfire Protection Measures
The purpose of this section of the Plan is to detail specific onsite vegetation management requirements suchas the APZ dimensions, management of Public Open Space or application of landscaping plans.
Vegetation area 1 requires modification to establish an Asset Protection Zone of the required dimensions - to
ensure that the potential radiant heat from a bushfire to impact the building/s, does not exceed 29 kW/m2. An
Indicative BAL 29 APZ has been applied to the existing dwellings onsite (Figure 3.1.1). The majority of the area
surrounding the existing dwellings is currently managed in a Parkland Cleared state (Low threat). It is expected
that in the future this vegetation will continue to be maintained in a Low threat state as per the AS 3959-2009
s2.2.3.2 requirements and the Shire of AMR Firebreak Notice. The proponent has indicated that onsite
vegetation maintenance includes: Slashing of entire property, removal of hangers and other tree branches fallen
throughout winter prior to Nov 31st yearly. On a more regular basis (bi monthly) gardeners attend to hedge,
mulch , remove leaves from gutters, trim ivy, vines etc. and remove vegetation litter from the property. Lawns
are mowed fortnightly.
The vegetation separation distances that are to apply to the APZ for this Proposal are presented below.
The ‘Planning (WAPC) BAL-29’ APZ
Requirement Set By Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas (WAPC 2017 v1.3)
Relevant Fire Danger Index (AS3959-2009 Table 2.1) 80
BAL Determination Method Method 1 (as per AS 3959-2009 s2.2.6 and Table 2.4.3)
VegetationArea
Applied Vegetation ClassificationEffective
Slope(degrees)
MaximumAcceptable
‘Planning’ BAL
RequiredSeparation
Distance(metres)
1 Class B Woodland 0
BAL-29
14
2 Class B Woodland 0 14
3 Class G Grassland 0 8
4 Class B Woodland 0-5 17
5 Class A Forest 0 21
6 Class G Grassland 0 8
This requirement has been established through the State bushfire provisions, SPP 3.7 and the associated Guidelines, asbeing a key compliance requirement for development proposals in WA.
85
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 30
State Government Variations to Apply
The State government may add to or modify the acceptable solutions of the Bushfire Protection Criteria(BPC) and/or apply technical requirements that vary from those specified in the Guidelines for Planning inBushfire Prone Areas (WAPC). In such instances, this Proposal will be assessed against these variationsand/or any specific local government technical requirements for emergency access and water.
DRAFT Position Statement: Tourism land uses within bushfire prone areas (DPLH - Dec 2018)
5.1 Policy Measures
Applications for tourism land uses should, as far as possible achieve the ‘intent’ for each element contained
within the Guidelines.
General policy measures for all tourism land uses are:
1. Minimize levels of radiant heat, smoke and ember attack through the provision of APZs for built
structures;
2. Provision of an appropriate operational environment for emergency service personnel during
firefighting and emergency management;
3. Provision of two different access routes in two different directions to two different destinations, or
provision of a refuge (included below as a land use specific measure); and
4. Provision of 10,000 litre minimum static water supply dedicated for firefighting purposes for each
habitable building where no reticulated water is available.
Definitions
Holiday accommodation means two or more dwellings on one lot used to provide short term accommodation
but does not include a bed and breakfast.
5.2 Bushfire Risk Assessment
Developing tourism land uses within remote and/or heavily vegetated areas comes with an inherent risk of
bushfire. Risks can be reduced but can never be fully eliminated. These risks must be understood in order to
anticipate and manage them and foster a culture of resilience at all levels.
Decision makers will need to be satisfied that the BMP:
1. identifies the risks;
2. proposes risk treatment measures appropriate to the development and the demonstrated risks,
consistent with the bushfire protection measures; and
3. identifies an appropriate and rigorous process for ongoing monitoring and review of risk management
for the life of the development.
86
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 31
Bushfire Response/Evacuation Advice – Risk Analysis
Proposed Use and Occupants
Proposed Use: Short Stay Accommodation/ Wedding Receptions
Potential Occupants: Adults/Youth/Children
Potential Occupant Issues: Non-English reading/speaking – Potentially not familiar with the local area
Special Health Considerations: N/a
Are occupants needs better suited to evacuation as a first choice? Yes
Site Issues
Building Construction: Existing buildings not built to the AS 3959 standards
Is the building likely to be impacted by significant radiant heat? Yes
Is a defendable space available? Yes
Are the grounds maintained? Yes
Access/egress – accessibility/choice:
Vehicle vs Pedestrian: Vehicle
Road Safety: Public Road access readily available
Road Network – Options: Two - way vehicle access/egress (Caves Road)
Are routes through bushfire prone vegetation: Implications, level of threat. Yes – Forest, Woodland &
Grassland
Existing Fire Fighting Infrastructure
Emergency services: Margaret River Volunteer Fire & Rescue Service – Approx. 8 km away
Water Supplies: No Reticulated Water - Emergency firefighting water (Tank) available on site
Evacuation Considerations
Destinations: Margaret River Townsite (8 km)
Movement: private/other vehicles, community vehicle, pedestrian: Private Vehicles
Requirement for ambulance or other special transport: N/a
Shelter in the Building Considerations
Is the property maintained free of fuel and litter in gutters and around buildings? - Yes
Is the building constructed to minimise the impact of a bushfire and have an APZ constructed and maintained
to the Standard? – No, not built to the AS 3959 standards – Onsite vegetation around the buildings is managed
– BAL 29 Asset Protection Zone can be achieved.
Is there access to an onsite refuge/amenity away from the direct threat of bushfire? Yes
Is their disabled access to shelter? Yes
Is sufficient supervision of occupants likely? Yes
87
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 32
Consultant’s Recommendation
After consideration of:
1. The assessment against the bushfire protection criteria; and
2. The Bushfire Response/Evacuation risk analysis
The practical solutions to provide for the safety of occupants and improve the bushfire resilience of existing
buildings on site, are presented in this Bushfire Management Plan as:
1. Any requirements established by the Bushfire Protection Criteria that can be complied with.
2. The Bushfire Response/Evacuation Advice – Information to Display
3. Landowner/Occupier responsibilities to inform occupants regarding awareness and actions to take in
response to bushfire
In the event of a bushfire impacting the property the occupants should evacuate the building and property asdirected by the relevant hazard management authority and the Bushfire Response/Evacuation Advice.
88
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 33
6 Responsibilities for Implementation and Management of the Bushfire
Protection Measures
Table 6.1: BMP Implementation responsibilities (Landowner)
LANDOWNER (DEVELOPER)
No. Implementation Actions
1
The local government may condition a development application approval with a requirement for thelandowner/proponent to register a notification onto the certificate of title (it may also need to beincluded on the deposited plan).
This will be done pursuant to Section 70A Transfer of Land Act 1893 as amended (‘Factors affecting useand enjoyment of land, notification on title:’). This is to give notice of the bushfire hazard and anyrestrictions and/or protective measures required to be maintained at the owner’s cost.
This condition ensures that:
1. Landowners/proponents are aware their lot is in a designated bushfire prone area and of their
obligations to apply the stated bushfire risk management measures; and
2. Potential purchasers are alerted to the Bushfire Management Plan so that future
landowners/proponents can continue to apply the bushfire risk management measures that
have been established in the Plan.
2
The entity responsible for having the BMP prepared should ensure that anyone listed as having
responsibility under the Plan has endorsed it and is provided with a copy for their information and
informed that it contains their responsibilities. This includes the landowners/proponents, local
government and any other authorities or referral agencies (‘Guidelines’ s4.6.3).
3Establish the Asset Protection Zone (APZ) on the lot to the dimensions and standard stated in the BMP.
This is the responsibility of the landowner.
4
Prior to occupancy, certain information contained within the bushfire response/evacuation plan
separate to this Bushfire Management Plan, must be displayed in the building – as directed in that
advice.
5Prior to occupancy, upgrade the required emergency static water supply (10,000 litre tank within the
lot) and associated vehicle access, to the standards stated in the BMP.
89
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 34
Table 6.2: Ongoing management responsibilities for the Landowner/Occupier.
LANDOWNER/OCCUPIER - ONGOING
No. Ongoing Management Actions
1 Maintain the Asset Protection Zone (APZ) to the dimensions and standard stated in the BMP
2Comply with the Shire of AMR Firebreak and Fuel Hazard Reduction Notice issued under s33 of the
Bush Fires Act 1954.
3Maintain vehicular access routes within the lot to the required surface condition and clearances as
stated in the BMP.
4
Ensure that any builders (of future structures on the lot) are aware of the existence of this Bushfire
Management Plan and the responsibilities it contains regarding the application of construction
standards corresponding to a determined BAL rating.
5
The bushfire response/evacuation plan contains information that is required to be displayed and
available to inform all occupants. This information must continue to be updated and displayed as
instructed, to ensure the content does not become outdated.
6Maintain the emergency water supply tank and its associated fittings and vehicular access in good
working condition.
Table 6.3: Ongoing management responsibilities for the Local Government.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT - ONGOING
No. Ongoing Management Actions
1Monitor landowner compliance with the Bushfire Management Plan and the annual Shire of AMR
Firebreak and Fuel Hazard Reduction Notice.
90
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 35
Appendix 1 - Onsite Vegetation Management Technical Requirements
It is the responsibility of the landowner to maintain the established bushfire protection measures on their
property. Not complying with these responsibilities can result in buildings being subject to a greater
potential impact from bushfire than that determined by the assessed BAL rating presented in this Bushfire
Management Plan.
For the management of vegetation within a lot (i.e. onsite) the following technical requirements exist:
1. The APZ: Installing and maintaining an asset protection zone (APZ) of the required dimensions to
the standard established by the Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas (WA Planning
Commission, as amended). When, due to the planning stage of the proposal to which this Bushfire
Management Plan applies, defined APZ dimensions are known and are to be applied to existing or
future buildings – then these dimensions are stated in Section 5.4.1 of this Plan.
2. The Firebreak/Fuel Load Notice: Complying with the requirements established by the relevant local
government’s annual firebreak notice issued under s33 of the Bushfires Act 1954. Note: If an APZ
requirement is included in the Notice, the standards and dimensions may differ from the Guideline’s
APZ Standard – the larger dimension must be complied with.
3. Changes to Vegetated/Non-Vegetated Areas:
a. If applicable to this Plan, the minimum separation distance from any classified vegetation,
that corresponds to the determined BAL for a proposed building, must be maintained as
either a non-vegetated area or as low threat vegetation managed to a minimal fuel
condition as per AS 3959-2009 s2.2.3.2 (e) and (f). Refer to Part 4 of this Appendix 1.
b. Must not alter the composition of onsite areas of classified vegetation (as assessed and
presented in Section 3.1.2) to the extent that would require their classification to be
changed to a higher bushfire threat classification (as per AS 3959-2009); and
c. Must not allow areas within a lot (i.e. onsite) that have been:
i. excluded from classification by being low threat vegetation or non-vegetated; and
ii. form part of the assessed separation distance that is determining a BAL rating -
…to become vegetated to the extent they no longer represent a low threat (refer to Part 4
of Appendix 1). Note: The vegetation classification exclusion specifications as established
by AS 3959-2009 s2.2.3.2, are included at A1.4 below for reference.
91
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 36
1. Requirements Established by the Guidelines – the Asset Protection Zone (APZ)Standards
(Source: Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas - WAPC 2017 v1.3 Appendix 4, Element 2, Schedule 1and Explanatory Note E2.1)
Defining the Asset Protection Zone (APZ)
Description: An APZ is an area surrounding a building that is managed to reduce the bushfire hazard to anacceptable level (by reducing fuel loads). The width of the required APZ varies with slope and vegetation. Forplanning applications, the minimum sized acceptable APZ is that which is of sufficient size to ensure thepotential radiant heat impact of a fire does not exceed 29kW/m² (BAL-29). It will be site specific.
The APZ may include public roads, waterways, footpaths, buildings, rocky outcrops, golf courses, maintainedparkland as well as cultivated gardens in an urban context, but does not include grassland or vegetation on aneighbouring rural lot, farmland, wetland reserves and unmanaged public reserves.
For subdivision planning, design elements and excluded/low threat vegetation adjacent to the lot can beutilised to achieve the required vegetation separation distances and therefore reduce the requireddimensions of the APZ within the lot.
Defendable Space: The APZ includes a defendable space which is an area adjoining the asset within whichfirefighting operations can be undertaken to defend the structure. Vegetation within the defendable spaceshould be kept at an absolute minimum and the area should be free from combustible items and obstructions.The width of the defendable space is dependent on the space which is available on the property, but as aminimum should be 3 metres.
Establishment: The APZ should be contained solely within the boundaries of the lot on which the building issituated, except in instances where the neighbouring lot or lots will be managed in a low-fuel state on anongoing basis, in perpetuity.
Note: Regardless of whether an Asset Protection Zone exists in accordance with the acceptable solutions andis appropriately maintained, fire fighters are not obliged to protect an asset if they think the separationdistance between the dwelling and vegetation that can be involved in a bushfire, is unsafe.
Schedule 1: Standards for APZ
Fences: within the APZ are constructed from non-combustible materials (e.g. iron, brick, limestone, metal post
and wire). It is recommended that solid or slatted non-combustible perimeter fences are used.
Objects: within 10 metres of a building, combustible objects must not be located close to the vulnerable parts
of the building i.e. windows and doors.
Fine Fuel Load: combustible dead vegetation matter less than 6 mm in thickness reduced to and maintained at
an average of two tonnes per hectare (example below).
92
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 37
Example Fine Fuel Load of Two Tonnes per Hectare
(Image source: Shire of Augusta Margaret River’s Firebreak and Fuel Reduction Hazard Notice)
Trees (> 5 metres in height): trunks at maturity should be a minimum distance of 6 metres from all elevations
of the building, branches at maturity should not touch or overhang the building, lower branches should be
removed to a height of 2 metres above the ground and or surface vegetation, canopy cover should be less than
15% with tree canopies at maturity well spread to at least 5 metres apart as to not form a continuous canopy.
Diagram below represents tree canopy cover at maturity.
Tree canopy cover – ranging from 15 to 70 per cent at maturity
(Source: Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas 2017, Appendix 4)
Shrubs (0.5 metres to 5 metres in height): should not be located under trees or within 3 metres of buildings,
should not be planted in clumps greater than 5m2 in area, clumps of shrubs should be separated from each
other and any exposed window or door by at least 10 metres. Shrubs greater than 5 metres in height are to be
treated as trees.
Ground covers (<0.5 metres in height): can be planted under trees but must be properly maintained to remove
dead plant material and any parts within 2 metres of a structure, but 3 metres from windows or doors if greater
than 100 mm in height. Ground covers greater than 0.5 metres in height are to be treated as shrubs.
Grass: should be managed to maintain a height of 100 mm or less.
The following example diagrams illustrate how the required dimensions of the APZ will be determined by thetype and location of the vegetation.
93
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 38
2. Requirements Established by the Local Government – the Firebreak Notice
These requirements are established by the relevant local government’s Firebreak Notice created under s33 of
the Bushfires Act 1954 and issued annually (potentially with revisions). The Notice may include additional
components directed at managing fuel loads, accessibility and general property management with respect to
limiting potential bushfire impact.
The relevant local government’s current Firebreak Notice is available on their website, at their offices and is
distributed as ratepayer’s information. It must be complied with.
If Asset Protection Zone technical requirements are defined in the Notice, the standards and dimensions may
differ from the Guideline’s APZ Standards, with the intent to better satisfy local conditions. When these are
more stringent than those created by the Guidelines, or less stringent and endorsed by the WAPC and DFES,
they must be complied with.
When, due to the planning stage of the proposal to which this Bushfire Management Plan applies, defined APZ
dimensions are known and are to be applied to existing or future buildings – then these dimensions are stated
in Section 5.4.1 of this Plan.
3. Requirements Recommended by DFES – Property Protection Checklists
Further guidance regarding ongoing/lasting property protection (from potential bushfire impact) is presented
in the publication ‘DFES – Fire Chat – Your Bushfire Protection Toolkit’. It is available from the Department of
Fire and Emergency Services (DFES) website.
94
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 39
4. Requirements Established by AS 3959-2009 - Maintaining Areas within your Lot as‘Low Threat’
This information is provided for reference purposes. This knowledge will assist the landowner to comply with
Management Requirement No. 3 set out in the Guidance Panel at the start of this Appendix. It identifies what is
required for an area of land to be excluded from classification as a potential bushfire threat.
“Australian Standard - AS 3959-2009 Section 2.2.3.2: Exclusions - Low threat vegetation and non-vegetated
areas:
The Bushfire Attack Level shall be classified BAL-LOW where the vegetation is one or a combination of the
following:
a) Vegetation of any type that is more than 100m from the site.
b) Single areas of vegetation less than 1ha in area and not within 100m of other areas of vegetation being
classified.
c) Multiple area of vegetation less than 0.25ha in area and not within 20m of the site or each other.
d) Strips of vegetation less than 20m in width (measured perpendicular to the elevation exposed to the strip
of vegetation) regardless of length and not within 20m of the site or each other, or other areas of
vegetation being classified.
e) Non-vegetated areas, including waterways, roads, footpaths, buildings and rocky outcrops.
f) Low threat vegetation, including grassland managed in a minimal fuel condition (i.e. insufficient fuel
available to significantly increase the severity of a bushfire attack – recognisable as short cropped grass
to a nominal height of 100mm for example), maintained lawns, golf courses, maintained public reserves
and parklands, vineyards, orchards, cultivated gardens, commercial nurseries, nature strips and
windbreaks.”
95
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 40
Appendix 2 - Vehicular Access Technical Requirements
Each local government may have their own standard technical requirements for emergency vehicular access
and they may vary from those stated in the Guidelines.
Contact the relevant local government for the requirements that are to apply in addition to the requirements
set out as an acceptable solution in the Guidelines. If the relevant local government requires that these are
included in the Bushfire Management Plan, they will be included in this appendix and referenced.
Requirements Established by the Guidelines – The Acceptable Solutions
(Source: Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas WAPC 2017 v1.3, Appendix 4)
Vehicular Access Technical Requirements - Part 1
Acceptable Solution 3.3: Cul-de-sacs (including a dead-end road)
Their use in bushfire prone areas should be avoided. Where no alternative exists then the following
requirements are to be achieved:
Maximum length is 200m. If public emergency access is provided between cul-de-sac heads (as a
right of way or public access easement in gross), the maximum length can be increased to 600m
provided no more than 8 lots are serviced and the emergency access way is less than 600m in
length;
Turnaround area requirements, including a minimum 17.5m diameter head to allow type 3.4 fire
appliances to turn around safely;
The cul-de-sac connects to a public road that allows for travel in two directions; and
Meet the additional design requirements set out in Part 2 of this appendix.
Acceptable Solution 3.5: Private Driveways
The following requirements are to be achieved:
The design requirements set out in Part 2 of this appendix; and
Where the house site is more than 50 metres from a public road:
Passing bays every 200 metres with a minimum length of 20 metres and a minimum width of two
metres (ie combined width of the passing bay and constructed private driveway to be a minimum
six metres);
Turn-around areas every 500 metres and within 50 metres of a house, designed to accommodate
type 3.4 fire appliances to turn around safely (ie kerb to kerb 17.5 metres);
Any bridges or culverts are able to support a minimum weight capacity of 15 tonnes; and
All weather surface (i.e. compacted gravel, limestone or sealed).
96
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 41
Acceptable Solution 3.8: Firebreak Width
Lots greater than 0.5 hectares must have an internal perimeter firebreak of a minimum width of three
meters or to the level as prescribed in the local firebreak notice issued by the local government.
Vehicular Access Technical Requirements - Part 2
Technical Component
Vehicular Access Types
PublicRoads
Cul-de-sacsPrivate
DrivewaysEmergency
Access WaysFire Service
Access Routes
Minimum trafficable surface (m) 6* 6 4 6* 6*
Horizontal clearance (m) 6 6 6 6 6
Vertical clearance (m) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Maximum grade <50 metres 1 in 10 1 in 10 1 in 10 1 in 10 1 in 10
Minimum weight capacity (t) 15 15 15 15 15
Maximum cross-fall 1 in 33 1 in 33 1 in 33 1 in 33 1 in 33
Curves minimum inner radius (m) 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5
* A six metre trafficable surface does not necessarily mean paving width. It could, for example, include four
metres of paving and one metre of constructed road shoulders. In special circumstances, where 8 lots or less
are being serviced, a public road with a minimum trafficable surface of four metres for a maximum distance
of ninety metres may be provided subject to the approval of both the local government and DFES.
97
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BMP)_v1.0.docx 42
Appendix 3 - Water Technical Requirements
Requirements Established by the Guidelines - Acceptable Solution A4.3: Non-Reticulated Areas – Single Lot
Each local government may have their own standard technical requirements for firefighting water supplies
and they may vary from those stated in the Guidelines.
Contact the relevant local government for the requirements that are to apply in addition to the requirements
set out as an acceptable solution in the Guidelines. If the relevant local government requires that these are
included in the Bushfire Management Plan, they will be included in this appendix and referenced.
Table A4.1: The acceptable solution as contained in the Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas WAPC2017 v1.3, Appendix 4, Element 4 – with example construction / coupling requirements from various sourcesincluding FESA (DFES) Operational Circular 07/2011 and Planning for Bushfire Protection Guidelines WAPC 2010.
Technical Requirements for Static Water Supply(example only – check with local government)
Application: Single lots above 500 m2 need a dedicated static water supply on the lot. This solutionis only for use if creating one additional lot and cannot be applied cumulatively.
Volume: Minimum 10,000 litres per tank dedicated to firefighting purposes. The storage tankmust not facilitate sharing the water for domestic use due to the danger ofcontamination.
Tank Construction: Above ground tanks constructed using concrete or metal.
Pipe Construction: Galvanised or copper (PVC if buried at least 300mm below ground).
Vehicle Access: Hardstand and turnaround area suitable for a 3.4 appliance (i.e. kerb to kerb17.5metres) is provided at the tank.
Couplings: Tanks are to be fitted with a full flow gate valve (not ball valve) and a 50mm or 100mmcam-lock coupling of metal/alloy construction (example below).
Responsibility: A procedure must be in place to ensure that water tanks are maintained at or abovedesignated capacity always.
98
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1-2
APPENDIX D
Bushfire Evacuation (Response) Plan
99
BPP Group Pty Ltd | ABN: 39 166 551 784
Level 1 159-161 James St, Guildford
PO Box 388 Guildford, WA 6935
08 6477 1144 | [email protected]
Bushfire Evacuation (Response) Plan
Gilgara RetreatLot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River
Shire of Augusta - Margaret River
Date Created: 1 February 2019
Bushfire ManagementPlan Number:
181016
100
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BERP)_v1.0.docx
©2018 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 2
BPP Group Pty Ltd t/a Bushfire Prone PlanningABN: 39 166 551 784
Level 1, 159-161 James StreetGuildford WA 6055
PO Box 388Guildford WA 6935
Ph: 08 6477 1144Email: [email protected]
Commercial in Confidence
The information, including any intellectual property, contained in this document is confidential andproprietary to the Company. It may only be used by the person to whom it is provided for the stated purposefor which it is provided and must not be imparted to any third person without the prior written approval ofthe Company. The Company reserves all legal rights and remedies in respect of its confidential information.
Copyright ©2019 BPP Group Pty Ltd
All intellectual property rights, including copyright, in format and proprietary content contained in documentscreated by Bushfire Prone Planning, remain the property of BPP Group Pty Ltd. Any use made of such formator content without the prior written approval of Bushfire Prone Planning, will constitute an infringement onthe rights of the Company which reserves all legal rights and remedies in respect of any such infringement.
Disclaimer
The measures contained in this Bushfire Management Plan are considered to be minimum standards and theydo not guarantee that a building will not be damaged in a bushfire, persons injured, or fatalities occur eitheron the subject site or off the site while evacuating. This is substantially due to the unpredictable nature andbehaviour of fire and extreme weather conditions. Additionally, the correct implementation of the requiredbushfire protection measures (and any associated response/evacuation plan if applicable) will depend, amongother things, on the actions of the landowners or occupiers over which Bushfire Prone Planning has no control.
All surveys, forecasts, projections and recommendations made in this report associated with the project aremade in good faith based on information available to Bushfire Prone Planning at the time.
All maps included herein are indicative in nature and are not to be used for accurate calculations.
Notwithstanding anything contained therein, Bushfire Prone Planning will not, except as the law may require,be liable for any loss or other consequences whether or not due to the negligence of their consultants, theirservants or agents - arising out of the services provided by their consultants.
101
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BERP)_v1.0.docx
©2018 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 3
Document Control
Version Version Details Date Submitted
1.0 Original Document 1-Feb-19
Co-author Accreditation Signature
Mike Scott BPAD Level 3 - No. 27795
Co-author
Mick Whitelaw BPAD Level 2 - No. 37265
Document Content Compliance Statement
This Bushfire Management Plan (the Plan) provides the required information to address State Planning PolicyNo. 3.7: Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas - December 2015 (SPP 3.7), the associated Guidelines for Planning inBushfire Prone Areas - WAPC 2017 v1.3 (Guidelines), and any additional information as directed by the WAPlanning Commission (WA Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage). It is fit for accompanying a planningapplication.
Simple DA BMP Template v1.0
102
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BERP)_v1.0.docx
©2018 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 4
1 Purpose of the Bushfire Evacuation (Response) Plan
The intent of this Bushfire Evacuation (Response) Plan is to provide strategic guidance to the
owners and occupants of the subject property with respect to:
1. Provision of information and tools to assist with preparation for a future bushfire event;
and
2. Provide actionable guidance in the event of a bushfire threatening the property.
The content of this Plan is specifically targeted at persons who do not have the skills or experience
to accurately determine the potential risk and behaviour of a bushfire. Therefore, it is not a
technical document and the emphasis is on the safety of lives rather than preservation of property.
As a result, the guidance provided in this Plan is based on information that is easily obtained and
incorporating a large safety margin into the required timing of response actions.
This Plan has been developed for the occupants of Gilgara Retreat - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road,
Margaret River
Compliance
The development and content of this Bushfire Evacuation Plan is aligned to the directions given throughthe following policies and guidelines:
Evacuation Planning Handbook 4, 3rd edition (2013) AEMI;
State Planning Policy 3.7 – Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas (December 2015);
Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas WAPC 2017 v1.3;
Australian Standards (AS) 3959-2009 Construction of buildings in bushfire prone- areas;
Bush Fires Act 1954 (as amended); and
AS 3745-2010 Planning for Emergencies in Facilities
Firebreak & Fuel Hazard Reduction Notice (2018-2019) – Shire of AMR
Local Emergency Management Arrangements & Local Recovery Plan (Shire of AMR - 2017)
Evacuation Maps (Shire of AMR - 2017)
Local Recovery Plan (Shire of AMR - February 2017)
DRAFT Position Statement: Tourism land uses within bushfire prone areas (DPLH - Dec 2018)
103
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BERP)_v1.0.docx
©2018 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 5
2 Annual Plan Review and Practice Log
IMPORTANT
Prior to the start of each bushfire season it should be reviewed, revised where necessary and therequired responses practiced. A bushfire can be a traumatic event that may include loud sirens, firealarms, intense heat and reduced visibility in the form of smoke. Where possible, landowners shouldprepare both physically and mentally for such an event focusing on the conditions they may be exposedto should a bushfire impact the site. Plan revisions should reflect changes in technology, personnel, andprocedures.
In the nominated Emergency Assembly Building:
1. The latest version of the Plan must be available; and
2. The Evacuation Planning Map/s & the Bushfire Response Zones Map
Site Specific Information
Old Ellenbrook Road is a Dead-End Road to the West. Old Ellenbrook Road only provides limited
access and egress in a single direction (East)
Early evacuation of the site prior to a bushfire impacting the site or the nominated access routes
is essential. Do not wait and see. Evacuate early.
The landowner/ property manager shall ensure that the evacuation plan and routes are
evaluated and updated annually to ensure these remain current and relevant.
Sheltering in the existing dwelling is not considered a contingency measure and differs vastly
from a Refuge Building or Refuge Open space. Early evacuation before a bushfire starts should
always be the priority.
Responsible Persons Onsite
Position NameContact Details
(mobile)
Manager Lizzie Nunn 0487 003 757 or 0410 665 336
104
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BERP)_v1.0.docx
©2018 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 6
3 Key Site Information
Gilgara RetreatLot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River
Property Size 9.1 Hectares
Onsite vegetation Low Threat - Managed Vegetation, Woodland & Grassland
Offsite vegetation Forest, Woodland & Grassland
Nearest Road Old Ellen Brook Road
Name of Nearest Cross Road Old Ellen Brook Road Vs Caves Road <50 metres
Access & Egress Caves Road Provides options for travel in two different directions
Nearest Town Margaret River (8km) Or Cowaramup (13km)
Are occupants permanent ortransient?
Transient – Wedding Guests/ Holiday makers
Are occupants disabled, medicallydependent, young children orelderly?
Potentially Yes
Water Supply No Reticulated Water Available:
Dedicated Firefighting Water tanks onsite
Maximum occupants onsite
Max overnight occupants = 36
Max onsite occupants = 120
(During a Wedding event – Guests & Staff Combined)
Caretaker onsite Yes – Manager (Lizzie Nunn)
Assets on site 8 Chalets
1 Homestead
Hazards on site Gas Bullet tank onsite
105
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BERP)_v1.0.docx
©2018 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 7
4 Evacuation Travel Routes
In the event of a fire emergency the Hazard Management Authority (Department of Fire & Emergency
Services) will assess the need to recommend the evacuation of an area under threat. This assessment
is undertaken by the Incident Controller (IC). The IC will then liaise with a representative of the
Department of Communities and the relevant local government authority an appropriate evacuation/
welfare centre will be determined. The location of the recommended evacuation/ welfare centre will
be published via the media (radio and TV) also within social media options.
Eastern Evacuation Route (1)
Margaret River Townsite
Follow the Private Driveway to the intersection of Old Ellen Brook and Caves Road. Head North onCaves Road for Carters Road. Travel East on Carters Road for the Bussell Highway. Head South onBussell Highway for Margaret River Townsite.
1. Follow the Private Driveway to the intersection of Old Ellen Brook and Caves Road
2. Turn Left onto Caves Road towards Carters Road (120m)
3. Turn Right onto Carters Road towards the Bussell Highway (6km)
4. Turn Right onto the Bussell Highway for Margaret River townsite (1km)
5. Arrive Margaret River townsite
Northern Evacuation Route (2)
Cowaramup Townsite
Follow the Private Driveway to the intersection of Old Ellen Brook and Caves Road. Head North on
Caves Road for Carters Road. Travel East on Carters Road for Burnside Road. Travel North on Burnside
Road for Bussell highway. Travel North on the Bussell Highway for Cowaramup townsite.
1. Follow the Private Driveway to the intersection of Old Ellen Brook and Caves Road
2. Turn Left onto Caves Road towards Carters Road (120m)
3. Turn Right onto Carters Road towards the Burnside Road (1.5km)
4. Turn Left onto the Burnside Road for Bussell highway (5.5km)
5. Turn Left onto the Bussell Highway for Cowaramup townsite (5km)
6. Arrive Cowaramup townsite
106
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BERP)_v1.0.docx
©2018 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 8
5 Emergency Contacts
Name of Organisation ServicePhone Number
Web Site
State Contacts
Life Threatening Emergencies Fire / Ambulance / Police 000
Department of Fire &Emergency Services (DFES)
Emergency Information 13 3337www.emergency.wa.gov.au
Department of Fire &Emergency Services (DFES)
Recorded Information Line 1300 657 209
Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) Recorded Information Line1300 659 213
State Emergency Service (SES) Various Emergency Services 132 500
St John Ambulance Emergency Medical/Transport 000 / 9538 3322
Red Cross Emergency Humanitarian Assistance 9225 8888 (all hours)
Salvation Army Social Services Care Line 1300 36 36 22
Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital Medical Services (08) 9346 3333
Princess Margaret Hospital Medical Services (08) 9340 8222
Margaret River Hospital Medical Services 9757 0400
Busselton Hospital Medical Services 9753 6000
Local Contacts
Bushfire Control Officer(Gracetown)
Peter Delfs 0427 555 491
Bushfire Control Officer(Prevelly)
Bob Baker 0438 669 701
Bushfire Control Officer Tim Garstone 0428 555 292
Emergency Services/ Shire CESM/ Rangers 0419 902 540
107
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BERP)_v1.0.docx
©2018 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 9
6 Bushfire Emergency - Awareness
Bushfire Response Zones Map
The Bushfire Response Zones Map identifies the two bushfire response zones and the safeevacuation routes from the subject property.
The dimensions of the bushfire response zones have been determined with consideration of:
The site’s situation in the broader landscape, including the wider road network, proximity
of settlements, extents of vegetated areas, distances to safe areas, population density of
the surrounding area, the numbers and mobility of residents onsite, the likely hood of being
able to receive accurate and timely bushfire information;
The potential rate of spread of a fire in the surrounding vegetation (the key factors being
the type and structure of vegetation that is present and the topography of the area); and
Incorporating the knowledge and practical experience of a BPAD Level 3 accredited bushfire
practitioner in determining the appropriate length of time required for decisions and
response.
1. Bushfire Awareness Zone
Be aware of the existence and to the best extent possible, the location and movement of a fire.
2. Evacuation Readiness Zone
The purpose of the Evacuation Readiness Zone is to indicate an appropriate area surrounding thesubject property within which, if a bushfire is present, the focus must be evacuation.
Information Sources to Monitor
ABC local radio – monitor regularly for local bushfire information
ABC Frequency (Margaret River) = 684 AM
DFES website - Monitor regularly for fire danger ratings, warnings bushfire locations / movement,and instructions. Source information and prepare requirements for sheltering from a bushfirewithin a building.
www.dfes.wa.gov.au or the www.emergency.wa.gov.au
BOM website - monitor regularly for fire danger ratings and weather http://www.bom.gov.au/
Mobile phones – monitor for emergency text messages.
108
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BERP)_v1.0.docx
©2018 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 10
7 Bushfire Emergency – Response - No Bushfire Identified
Daily actions during the bushfire risk season.
Bureau of Meteorology FDR Forecast ‘Catastrophic’
Consider total Evacuation / Relocation of all non-essential staff and members of the community
from the property the day before; and
Consider evacuating remaining staff by 9 am on the day. It is important to evacuate early, hours
before a bushfire starts. Do not wait and see.
Bureau of Meteorology FDR Forecast ‘Very High’ ‘Severe’ or ‘Extreme’
A briefing to be provided to all staff that addresses the forecast Fire Danger Rating and its
implications for the day;
Nominated personnel will consult and continue to monitor the Bushfire Awareness Zone for
bushfires throughout the day and evening. Monitoring will consist of checking websites, listening
to the radio and looking out for smoke on the horizon regularly but at least three times daily (e.g.
morning, midday and afternoon)
109
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BERP)_v1.0.docx
©2018 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 11
8 Bushfire Emergency – Response – Bushfire Identified
Bushfire is identified near your location
Action
1. Monitor the ABC local radio regularly for local bushfire information (weather trends,
warnings, locations).
2. Occupants should, to the best extent possible, locate the bushfire on a map (or device) and
identify the direction of the fire movement (consider local wind direction and any
information from the emergency services). Be aware there may be several bushfires;
If the bushfire location is unable to be determined with reasonable accuracy,
assume the worst and prepare to evacuate to the nearest townsite.
3. Occupants must identify the appropriate evacuation route to use should the decision be
made to evacuate, and an alternative if available,
4. Monitor the situation closely, keep informed.
Making the Decision to Evacuate
5. Be aware of your ongoing ability to evacuate safely and base the decision to evacuate on
this ability or any emergency services directives received; and
6. If the fire is moving towards your required evacuation route evacuate now if you can
execute the evacuation safely.
If the Evacuation Routes are determined to no longer be safe, then SHELTERING-IN-PLACE will be the required action.
110
181016 - Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River (BERP)_v1.0.docx
©2018 BPP Group Pty Ltd Page | 12
Shelter in Place Procedures
Shelter in the Homestead
Note: Sheltering in the existing dwelling is not considered a contingency measure and differs vastly
from a Refuge Building or Refuge Open space. Early evacuation before a bushfire starts should
always be the priority.
Prepare the building by:
Removing all small combustible items from around the building in which sheltering -
including combustibles from verandahs and decking;
Remove curtains and flammable furniture away from windows;
Close all doors and windows
Immediately notify DFES by dialling 000 and give the following details:
1. Nature of the incident and state that people are sheltering in place;
2. Location (street address);
3. Nearest cross roads (names and distance);
4. Where sheltering;
5. Entry point to shelter – identifying markers;
6. Number of people sheltering;
7. Number of special needs persons;
8. Can you see the fire front /estimate distance away; and
9. Can you see spot fires / are spot fires around the shelter?
10. If the nominated Emergency Assembly Building is deemed unsafe or to be under direct
threat, occupants must evaluate the situation and make informed decisions. The choice will
be to continue to stay and defend or proceed to an area of minimal fuel vegetation as a last
resort and if it is safe to do so. The latter action is not recommended but is an alternative
if the current refuge is deemed to be not safe for occupants and vehicle evacuation routes
remain unsafe.
111
TUNBRIDGE ST
IL L AWARRAAV
MIK E RD
DEVON DR WALLCLIFFERDRAILWAY TCE
WILLMOTT AV
ECHO RDCARTERS RD
KEVIL
L RD
FOX RD
BURNSIDE RD
SPRIN
G RD
SUGA
R RD
MANSFIELDAV
HORS EF ORD
RD
ASHT
O NRD
ZANIPL
MCQUEEN RD
BUSS
ELL H
WY
BUSSELLHWY
R A ILWAY
T CE
BURNS
IDERD
CONNELLY
RDIRONSTONE
PL
DOYLE PLFORRES T RD
VAN TRIPP RD
LYNNRD
ASHT
ON
ST
O'NEI
LLRD
P LOTRD
STAT
ION R
DJIG
RD
FRESHWATERDR
MOTT RD
MENTEL L ERD
F ORESTRD
NORM RD
GARSTONE RD
ELLEN BROOK RD
ENGINE RD
DOG
RD
YOKE
RD
PALANDRI RD
BIGR OCK
RD
ABLE RDGAN RD
CAVES RD
PATT
ON R
D
R IVERV IE W DRCA
VES R
D
UMBE
RTORD
Landgate / SLIP
____________ LEGEND ____________
Lot 5
Evacuation Readiness Zone (3km)
Bushfire Awarenesss Zone (5km)
!Evacuation Travel Route
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Metres
____________ SCALE (A3) ____________
Disclaimer and Limitation: This map has been prepared for bushfire management planning purposes only. All depicted areas, contours and any dimensions shown are subject to survey. Bushfire Prone Planning does not guarantee that this map is without flaw of any kind and disclaims all liability for any errors, loss or other consequence which may arise from relying on any information depicted.
Map created on: 23/01/2019
B R A M L E YB R A M L E Y
C O W A R A M U PC O W A R A M U P
R O S AR O S AB R O O KB R O O KM A R G A R E TM A R G A R E T
R I V E RR I V E R
W I T C H C L I F F EW I T C H C L I F F E
M E T R I C U PM E T R I C U P
COWARAMUPEAST
MARGARETRIVER
GRACETOWN
WITCHCLIFFE
PREVELLY
COWARAMUP
__________ LOCALITY __________
p
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook RoadMargaret River
Aerial Image: Landgate 2018
Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50Projection: Universal Transverse Mercator
Map compiled by: Mick Whitelaw
Contact Phone #Emergency 000
DFES 13 33 37Fire Control 0427 555 491Fire Control 0438 669 701Fire Control 0419 902 540
Nearest Evacaution CentreMargaret River Recreation Centre51 Wallcliffe Rd, Margaret River a
Bushfire Awareness Zones
aMargaret River
Development Site
aTo Cowaramup
112
EmergencyAccess Gate
EmergencyAccess GateOLD ELLEN BROOK RD
CAVES
RD
CARTERS RD
Landgate / SLIP
____________ LEGEND ____________
Lot 5
!Evacuation Travel Route
0 25 50 75 100
Metres
____________ SCALE (A3) ____________
Disclaimer and Limitation: This map has been prepared for bushfire management planning purposes only. All depicted areas, contours and any dimensions shown are subject to survey. Bushfire Prone Planning does not guarantee that this map is without flaw of any kind and disclaims all liability for any errors, loss or other consequence which may arise from relying on any information depicted.
Map created on: 23/01/2019
B R A M L E YB R A M L E Y
C O W A R A M U PC O W A R A M U P
B U R N S I D EB U R N S I D E
M A R G A R E TM A R G A R E TR I V E RR I V E R
COWARAMUP EAST
MARGARETRIVER
GRACETOWN
PREVELLY
COWARAMUP
__________ LOCALITY __________
p
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook RoadMargaret River
Aerial Image: Landgate 2018
Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50Projection: Universal Transverse Mercator
Map compiled by: Mick Whitelaw
Contact Phone #Emergency 000
DFES 13 33 37Fire Control 0427 555 491Fire Control 0438 669 701Fire Control 0419 902 540
Nearest Evacaution CentreMargaret River Recreation Centre51 Wallcliffe Rd, Margaret River
aTo Margaret River
a
Evacuation Planning Map 1
113
Sep
tem
ber
/201
7/V1
.0
The information contained in this material is provided voluntarily as a public service by the Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES). This material has been prepared in good faith and is derived from sources believed to be reliable and accurate at the time of publication. Nevertheless, the reliability and accuracy of the information cannot be guaranteed and DFES expressly disclaims liability for any act or omission done or not done in the reliance on the information and for any consequences whether direct or indirect, arising from such act or omission. This publication is intended to be a guide only and viewers should obtain their own independent advice and make their own necessary inquiries.
For more information visit dfes.wa.gov.auor contact DFES Community Engagement – 9395 9816
?
Bushfi re Fact SheetBushfi re Fact Sheet
Bushfi re Warning System
During a bushfi re, emergency services will provide you as much information as possible through a number of different methods.
There are four levels of warning. These change to refl ect the increasing risk to your life or property, and the decreasing amount of time you have until the fi re arrives.
WATCH AND ACT
EMERGENCY WARNING
ADVICE
ALL CLEAR
EMERGENCY WARNING
You are in danger and need to take immediate action to survive. There is a threat to lives or homes.
ADVICE
A fi re has started but there is no immediate threat to lives or homes. Be aware and keep up to date.
ALL CLEAR
Take care to avoid any dangers and keep up to date.
WATCH AND ACT
There is a possible threat to lives or homes. You need to leave or get ready to defend – do not wait and see.
Your surroundings could be your best information source.Stay alert to what is happening around you. If you believe you may be in danger, act immediately to stay safe.
Stay alert when a bushfi re starts! Do not wait and see, this can be deadly.!
Where can you get information during a bushfi re?Know where to fi nd information before the fi re season starts. Work out what your local ABC radio station is and familiarise yourself with the DFES website.
Bushfi re Warnings at www.emergency.wa.gov.au
DFES Information Line on 13DFES (13 3337)
Local radio and other local media
Bushfi re Warning System
114
]NKXK%ZU%LOTJ%ZNKYK%ZUURY%%6D9#EJ>;H#?CFEHJ6DJ#?D<EHC6J?ED
S[S`US\Qg*eO*U]d*Oc
RTSa*eO*U]d*Oc
B]QOZ#\Sea##
T`][#bVS#bd(#`ORW]##
O\R#eSPaWbSa
9<;I#S[S`US\Qg##
W\T]`[ObW]\#ZW\S3
-/#///2
N]c`#ac``]c\RW\Ua#
Q]cZR#PS#g]c`#PSab#
W\T]`[ObW]\#a]c`QS*#9<;I#JeWbbS`#%#<OQSP]]Y
KaS#bVWa#b]]Z#ROWZg#Rc`W\U#PcaV"`S#aSOa]\#b]#[]\Wb]`#Q]\RWbW]\a#W\#g]c`#O`SO*##
7OaSR#]\#T]`SQOab#eSObVS`#Q]\RWbW]\a(#bVS#VWUVS`#bVS#`ObW\U(#bVS#VWUVS`#bVS#`WaY#]T#PcaV"`S*
LOXK%JGTMKX%XGZOTMY@%
IGZGYZXUVNOI
JVS#e]`ab#Q]\RWbW]\a#T]`#O#"`S*#>][Sa#O`S#\]b##
RSaWU\SR#]`#PcWZb#b]#eWbVabO\R#O#"`S#W\#bVSaS#Q]\RWbW]\a*#
JVS#]\Zg#aOTS#^ZOQS#Wa#OeOg#T`][#PcaV"`S#`WaY#O`SOa*#
K^ZXKSK%%%%YK\KXK%%%%\KX_%NOMN
ISSY#]cb#W\T]`[ObW]\#O\R#PS#`SORg#b]#ZSOdS#]`##
abOg#O\R#OQbWdSZg#RSTS\R#g]c`#^`]^S`bg#WT#O#"`S#abO`ba*##
E\Zg#abOg#WT#g]c#O`S#-,,$#^`S^O`SR*
NOMN%%%%RU]2SUJKXGZK
7S#dWUWZO\b*#8VSQY#g]c`#"`S#^ZO\#O\R#Q]\bW\cS##
b]#[]\Wb]`#Q]\RWbW]\a#Oa#bVSg#QO\#QVO\US#_cWQYZg*
7;<EH;#6#7KI><?H;
115
Sep
tem
ber
/201
7/V1
.0
The information contained in this material is provided voluntarily as a public service by the Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES). This material has been prepared in good faith and is derived from sources believed to be reliable and accurate at the time of publication. Nevertheless, the reliability and accuracy of the information cannot be guaranteed and DFES expressly disclaims liability for any act or omission done or not done in the reliance on the information and for any consequences whether direct or indirect, arising from such act or omission. This publication is intended to be a guide only and viewers should obtain their own independent advice and make their own necessary inquiries.
For more information visit dfes.wa.gov.auor contact DFES Community Engagement – 9395 9816
?
Bushfi re Fact SheetBushfi re Fact Sheet
Sheltering in Your Home
Preparing to evacuateShelter in the house for as long as possible. Many people have died from toxic smoke and fumes when their house has caught fi re.
If your house catches on fi re and the conditions inside become unbearable, leave through the door furthest from the approaching fi re and go to an area that has already been burnt.
The majority of people die in a bushfi re from radiant heat. You should protect yourself from radiant heat with long sleeves, long trousers and strong leather boots.
People have died sheltering in bathrooms and other rooms without an exit door leading outside. Make sure you can easily escape and shelter in a room with at least two ways to get outside and one that has a water supply (eg. a laundry with a door that goes outside or a kitchen).
!
Sheltering in your home during a bushfi re should be your last option, when all other plans fail and you are unable to leave.
Bushfi res are very unpredictable and you need to be well prepared to change your plans if you can no longer leave your property.
Even if you do not intend to stay and actively defend your property, you need to be physically and mentally prepared if sheltering in your home becomes your only option.
When the fi re front passes, the heat will be extreme and you must shelter at this time whether you planned to or not.
If it is too late to leave the property• Stay in the house when the fi re front is passing.
• If people are expecting you to leave, let them know you are now staying.
• Take shelter inside in the room furthest from the fi re front.
• Make sure all doors and windows are sealed as best as possible.
• Soak towels and rugs in water, and lay them along the inside of external doorways.
• Soak woollen blankets and keep them handy for protection against radiant heat.
• Take down curtains and push furniture away from windows.
• Get down low to limit your exposure to smoke.
• Actively defend your property by putting out spot fi res.
• Remember to check the roof cavity through the manhole for any spot fi res.
• Drink plenty of water to avoid becoming dehydrated.
116
The information contained in this material is provided voluntarily as a public service by the Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES). This material has been prepared in good faith and is derived from sources believed to be reliable and accurate at the time of publication. Nevertheless, the reliability and accuracy of the information cannot be guaranteed and DFES expressly disclaims liability for any act or omission done or not done in the reliance on the information and for any consequences whether direct or indirect, arising from such act or omission. This publication is intended to be a guide only and viewers should obtain their own independent advice and make their own necessary inquiries.
For more information visit dfes.wa.gov.auor contact DFES Community Engagement – 9395 9816
?
Bushfi re Fact SheetBushfi re Fact Sheet
Travelling During a Bushfi re
Sep
tem
ber
/201
7/V1
.0
Check the weather forecast and current fi re restrictions. Be aware of the Fire Danger Rating for the area you are travelling to and be prepared to reassess your plans.Download the Bushfi re Traveller’s Checklist at www.dfes.wa.gov.au
!
LOW-MODERATE CATASTROPHIC
HIGH
VERY HIGH
EXTR
EMESE
VERE
If you become trapped by a fi re• Park the vehicle off the roadway where there is
little vegetation, with the vehicle facing towards the oncoming fi re front.
• Turn the engine off.
• Close the car doors, windows and outside vents.
• Call 000.
• Stay as close to the fl oor as possible and cover your mouth with a damp cloth to avoid inhalation of smoke. If smoke enters the vehicle, toxic fumes are released from the interior of the vehicle.
• Stay covered in woollen blankets, continue to drink water and wait for assistance.
• Stay in the car until the fi re front has passed and do not open windows or doors.
• Once the front has passed and the temperature has dropped, cautiously exit the vehicle. Internal parts may still be extremely hot.
Important information
Find the local ABC radio frequency in the area you are travelling though. In a major emergency, when lives and property are at risk, ABC radio will issue broadcast warnings at a quarter to and a quarter past the hour.Main Roads provides updated information on road closures throughout Western Australia. Call 138 138 or www.mainroads.wa.gov.au
What will you do if you encounter a bushfi re while travelling or staying near bushland?In Western Australia, bushfi res can start suddenly without warning throughout the year. People have been killed or seriously injured during bushfi res. If you are travelling or staying near bushland, fi re is a real risk to you.
Be aware of your surroundings and carry a printed map of the areas you are visiting. Pack an emergency kit to take with you including important items such as woollen blankets, drinking water and protective clothing.
If there is a lot of smoke• Slow down as there could be people, vehicles
and livestock on the road.
• Turn your car headlights and hazard lights on.
• Close the windows and outside vents.
• If you can’t see clearly, pull over and wait until the smoke clears.
117
Sep
tem
ber
/201
7/V1
.0
The information contained in this material is provided voluntarily as a public service by the Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES). This material has been prepared in good faith and is derived from sources believed to be reliable and accurate at the time of publication. Nevertheless, the reliability and accuracy of the information cannot be guaranteed and DFES expressly disclaims liability for any act or omission done or not done in the reliance on the information and for any consequences whether direct or indirect, arising from such act or omission. This publication is intended to be a guide only and viewers should obtain their own independent advice and make their own necessary inquiries.
For more information visit dfes.wa.gov.auor contact DFES Community Engagement – 9395 9816
?
Bushfi re Fact SheetBushfi re Fact Sheet
Safer Places in a Bushfi re
Where to go as a last resortIt is important to identify places where you can go as a last resort if you are unable to leave or implement your bushfi re survival plan. A ‘safer place’ is somewhere you can shelter during bushfi re. These places may include a local open space, a dam or beach. Identify and plan where your family safer place will be.
Safer places have their limitations. There are things that you will need to consider if you do plan to use a safer place in your bushfi re survival planning:• They do not guarantee safety in all circumstances.
You and your families’ safety should be your fi rst priority.
• There may be a risk with travelling to your safer place. Check to see if the route is safe and clear, have a contingency route or safer place in your back-up plan.
• Firefi ghters may not be there, they may be fi ghting the main fi re front elsewhere.
• Your safer place caters for animals or pets. You will need to consider this in your bushfi re survival plan.
• Your safer place may not cater for animals or pets. You will need to consider this in your bushfi re survival plan.
• Your safer place may not provide shelter from the elements of a bushfi re, particularly fl ying embersand hot weather. Keep woollen blankets in your car to give you shelter from fl ying embers and a supply of drinking water.
If you or a family member have special needs you should think about what assistance may be needed at a safer place. You will need to consider this in your Bushfi re Survival Plan.
!
Consider the use of a safer place as part of your backup plan when:
• You are not able to carry out your Bushfi re Survival Plan.
• Your plan was to stay and actively defend however the fi re has worsened and your home is no longer a safe place to shelter. Leaving your home in this situation is now your safest option.
Once you have arrived at your safer place you need to:
• Keep up to date with fi re information by radio, mobile phone or whatever means of communication you have.
• Make sure all doors and windows are sealed as best as possible if your safer place is a building.
• Seek protection from radiant heat and embers as best you can if your safer place is an open space. Cover any exposed skin with blankets or clothing and lie fl at on the ground as the fi re passes.
• Remain vigilant for possible ember attack and new fi re fronts.
118
Scheme Amendment
Lot 5 (3) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown
PR140773-1-2
APPENDIX E
In-principle Approval
119
Our Ref:
Enquirles:
12 December 2018
P218413 Pry/3702
Matt SIocomb
RPS Australia East Pty LtdPO Box 170WEST PERTH WA 6872
Dear SinMadam
In Principle Scheme Amendment3 (Lot 5) Old Ellen Brook Road, Margaret River
I refer to the In-Principle amendment submitted for Lot 5 Old Ellen Brook Road,Gracetown.
Shire staff have undertaken a detailed review of the proposal and prepared a report whichhas been considered by the Shire's executive leadership team. It has been decided not topresent the matter to Council, as a determination prior to formal initiation may prejudicefurther decision making as required.
Nonetheless, staff are prepared to advise that they would support a future application toinitiate an amendment to rezone 3 (Lot 5) Old Ellen Brook Road, Gracetown subject to thefollowing:
o*S"
,,,
00, ,A
7
OA R E Q,
Preparation of a Bushfire Management Plan and Bushfire Emergency EvacuationPlan.
Confirmation from DFES and Main Roads WA that the proposed accessarrangements are supported and consistent with the requirements of the BushfireProtection Criteria of the Planning for Bushfire Protection Guidelines.
PO Box 61 . Margaret RiverWestern Australia 6285
(08) 9780 5255 F (08) 975725i 2
amrshire@amrshire. wagov. auamrshire. wagov. au
ABN 135,32960i9
.P.
You should be aware that the above does riot guarantee final support to a futureamendment which will be assessed on its merits and that the Shire reserves the right tomodify and/or impose additional controls on the proposed use in response to legitimateissues raised during the consultation period.
As previously advised, the fees paid as part of the in principle' amendment request will bededucted from a future initiation request should you proceed.
If you have any further queries in relation to the above then please do not hesitate tocontact me (08) 97805238.
Yours sincerely
Matt Cuthbert
Acting Manager, Planning and Development Services
at ural I Connected I Prosperous120
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING 26 JUNE 2019
11.2 Sustainable Development 11.2.2 SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE – 16
MAY 2019
Attachment 1 – Unconfirmed Sustainable Economy Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes – 16 May 2019
121
Sustainable Economy Advisory Committee
MINUTES
FOR THE MEETING HELD MONDAY, 16 MAY 2019
IN MAINBREAK, WALLCLIFFE ROAD, MARGARET RIVER
COMMENCING AT 5:30PM
122
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 16 MAY 2019
2
Notice of Meeting
Please be advised that the next meeting of the Augusta Margaret River Sustainable Economy Advisory Committee will be held on 15 August 2019 in the Mainbreak, 41 Wallcliffe Road, Margaret River commencing at 5.30pm This meeting is open to members of the public. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please contact Claire Schiller, Governance Officer / Council Support. Contact Number: 9780 5205 Email Address: [email protected]
123
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 16 MAY 2019
3
ROLE OF THE COMMITTEE To formulate for Council’s consideration recommendations on policy, programs and projects to support the Augusta Margaret River community to transition to livelihoods and enterprises that are sustainable, climate-resilient, diverse and locally-owned in a circular economy, a regenerative and improving environment and a just community that upholds the rights of everyone.
OBJECTIVES OF THE COMMITTEE 1. To recognise the fundamental importance of a healthy natural environment as the most importance
base for supporting sustainable economic activity in the Shire and to ensure that economic activities conducted in the Shire do not damage or denigrate the natural environment.
2. To provide a forum for key stakeholder representatives to participate in developing a sustainable economy and provide relevant advice to Council
3. To foster the creation of sustainable livelihoods and enterprises which reduce inequality and social disadvantage.
4. To foster the creation of sustainable livelihoods and enterprises which are climate resilient. 5. To foster the transition from the linear economy (take, make, dispose) to a regenerative circular
economy (reduce, reuse, recycle). 6. To develop strategies for Aboriginal and Culturally and Linguistic Diverse communities to fully
participate in sustainable economic activity. 7. To foster economic vibrancy in towns, villages and hamlets and assist local businesses to remain
viable and successful. 8. To develop strategies to achieve the Shire’s Vision 2036 and the key objectives of the Sustainable
Economy Strategy.
124
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 16 MAY 2019
4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM NO. SUBJECT PAGE NO.
1. DECLARATION OF OPENING .................................................................................................. 5 2. APPOINTMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 5 3. ATTENDANCE ........................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 APOLOGIES ............................................................................................................................... 5
4. PUBLIC QUESTIONS ................................................................................................................ 5 4.1 CURTIS HUNTER - THERMAL ENERGY - REQUEST FOR ASISTANCE WITH
FUNDING APPLICATION ........................................................................................................... 5
5. DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST ................................................................................................. 5 5.1 UPDATE FROM COORDINATOR LEGAL SERVICES - DISCLOSURES OF
INTEREST .................................................................................................................................. 5
6. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING ..................................................... 5 6.1 SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 8 APRIL
2019 ............................................................................................................................................ 6
7. REPORTS ................................................................................................................................... 5 8. MATTERS ARISING FROM PREVIOUS MINUTES .................................................................. 6 8.1 LIVE ACTION LIST ..................................................................................................................... 6
9. GENERAL BUSINESS ............................................................................................................... 7 9.1 COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP ..................................................................................................... 7 9.2 EVENTS………………………………………………..………………………………………………...7 9.3 STAKEHOLDER GROUP SNAPSHOTS.................................................................................... 8 9.3.1 JUST HOME MARGARET RIVER - MOTION TO INCREASE NEWSTART ........................... 14 9.4 SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY STRATEGY ................................................................................. 14 9.5 HOMEWORK - ACTIONS FOR THE STRATEGY FROM STAKEHOLDER GROUP
PERSPECTIVE ......................................................................................................................... 15
10. MATTERS FOR WHICH THE MEETING MAY BE CLOSED .................................................. 15 11. NEXT MEETING ....................................................................................................................... 15
12. CLOSURE ................................................................................................................................ 15
125
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 16 MAY 2019
5
Minutes of the Sustainable Economy Advisory Committee Meeting held on Thursday 16 May 2019, in Mainbreak, 41 Wallcliffe Road, Margaret River, commencing at 5.30pm
Sustainable Economy Advisory Committee Meeting
1. DECLARATION OF OPENING The Chair welcomed all in attendance and declared the meeting open at 5.38pm The Chair gave an Acknowledgement of Country: ‘I acknowledge and respect the traditional custodians of this land and pay our respects to elders past and present and emerging, whose lands we share.’
2. APPOINTMENTS Nil 3. ATTENDANCE
Committee Members South West Development Commission: Mr Jack Carlsen Margaret River Chamber of Commerce and Industry: Mr Steve Castan, Deputy Chair Augusta Chamber of Commerce and Industry: Ms Andrea Lindsay Margaret River Busselton Tourism Association: Ms Steve Harrison Cowaramup Retailers Association: Mr Daniel Kozyrski Lower South West Growers Group: Ms Barbara Dunnet Margaret River Regional Producers Association: Ms Kat Lombardo Nature Conservation Margaret River: Mr Stuart Hicks Representative of the Digital Economy: Mr Tim Kerr Margaret River Regional Environment Centre: Mr Ray Swarts Transition Margaret River: Ms Britta Sorenson Just Home Margart River: Ms Geraldine Clark
Councillor Representatives Shire President, Cr Pam Townshend Cr Pauline McLeod, Chair Shire Staff Acting Director Sustainable Development: Mr Nick Logan Sustainable Economy Officer (SEO): Mr Saul Cresswell Coordinator Legal Services: Mr Ian McLeod Governance Officer / Council Support: Ms Claire Schiller (minutes)
Observers Barbara Maidment Curtis Hunter
3.1 Apologies
Margaret River Community Centre: Ms Lyn Moorfoot / Ms Lydell Huntly Creative Corner: Mr Peter Griffyn Margaret River Wine Association: Ms Amanda Whiteland Registered Accomodation Providers, MR Region : Ms Debbie Noonan
126
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 16 MAY 2019
6
4. PUBLIC QUESTIONS
4.1 Curtis Hunter, Thermal Energy – Request for Assistance with Funding Application Q: I have an opportunity to apply for Federal funding and am seeking support and
assistance with the application. How can SEAC help? The Chair provided the following response: SEAC will pass the project to the Sustainable Economy Officer, Saul Cresswell.
5. DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST 5.1 Update from Coordinator Legal Services – Disclosures of Interest Coordinator Legal Service, Ian McLeod, gave an overview of the statutory requirements in relation to disclosures of interest as per the Local Government Act 1995 and Code of Conduct. Coordinator Legal Services left the meeting at 5.48pm.
6. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING 5.1 Sustainable Economy Advsiory Committee Meeting held 8 April 2019 Geraldine Clark informed the meeting of an administrative error in the 8 April 2019 minutes. Geraldine was recorded as an apology, this was incorrect as she had not received notification of the venue, time or date of the meeting. The minutes have been updated to reflect this and the correction included in the below motion: MOTION / SEAC DECISION MOVED: STUART HICKS SECONDED: KAT LOMBARDO That the Committee confirms the minutes, with correction, of the Sustainable Economy Advisory Committee held on 8 April 2019 to be a true and correct record of the meeting.
CARRIED 14/0 SEAC2019/4
7. REPORTS Nil
8. MATTERS ARISING FROM PREVIOUS MINUTES 8.1 Live Action List
Decision No.
Meeting Date
Action Item Action Update Status Actioning Officer
3 8 April SEAC Decision / Recommendation to Council: That the following groups and individual be appointed as
8/05/2019 Recommendation to appoint additional members not supported by Council.
Action in progress
n/a
127
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 16 MAY 2019
7
members to the SEAC: a) Augusta Margaret River Clean Community Energy; b) Lower Blackwood Land Conservation District Committee; c) Witchcliffe Eco Village; and d) Barbara Maidment.
Council resolved that SEAC consider rationalising committee numbers (Item 9.1)
9. GENERAL BUSINESS 9.1 Committee Membership
At the 8 May 2019 Ordinary Council meeting, Council did not support the SEAC’s recommendation of appointing additional members to the committee and resolved:
SUPPLEMENTARY MOTION / COUNCIL DECISION CR EARL, CR TOWNSHEND OM2019/79 That Council request the SEAC to consider rationalising the numbers on the committee because the numbers appear unwieldy.
CARRIED 7/0 The Chair advised the meeting that as there was only one SEAC meeting scheduled prior to the Committee’s disslove with the upcoming Local Government Elections in October, the SEAC keep its existing structure and look into the possibility of re-establishing it as a ‘working group’. MOTION / SEAC DECISION MOVED: STUART HICKS SECONDED: BARBARA DUNNET That the SEAC Terms of Reference, in particular membership, be assessed by Shire Officers with a report coming back to SEAC on 15 August 2019.
CARRIED 14/0 SEAC2019/5
9.2 Events Consideration of upcoming events in the Shire could become a standing item on the agenda, with the Committee to discuss opportunities for further economic and social leveraging of events. Upcoming Events: • Climate Action Summit – 28 May 2019 • Surf Pro
Points of discussion included: • Arts Margaret River have a new sustainable policy. Is there any way we can introduce a waste free
event policy to ensure all events are sustainable with zero waste. • The Gourmet Escape produce a huge amount of waste, how far can we go to prevent this? • Is waste at events something the Shire can control? • Shire can issue permits / funding with conditions. The Shire can also provide education. • Possibility of introducing sponsorship opportunities, e.g. bamboo plates, etc. • Does the Shire have a bio cup composting facility? If not, the cups, plates, etc.end up in landfill.
128
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 16 MAY 2019
8
• Should the Shire be micro managing at this level? • Promotion of the ‘wash up trailer’ which has been a great success in past events. • Some major music festivals offer free tickets to ‘bin fairies’ responsible for helping people separate
litter. • When there is an event in the Shire, for example the Surf Pro, the whole town should get behind it
and celebrate it. MOTION / SEAC DECISION MOVED: BRITTA SORENSEN SECONDED: JACK CARLSEN That ‘Upcoming Events’ become a standing item on the SEAC agenda.
CARRIED 14/0 SEAC2019/6
The Chair gave an overview of the upcoming Climate Action Summit: Climate Action Summit • Tuesday 28 May, Surf Pro Tent. • There are 100 delegates attending. • There has been wide consultation with every community group invited to provide input. • There are still have a few spots left. • We are looking for two representatives from the SEAC, please send you interest to the SEO if you
would like to attend. • The opening speaker is international commentator, Tim Flannery. The closing speaker is Ben Elton. • If anyone is unable to attend but would like a say, please use submission form to submit ideas. • The recent Youth Summit was fantastic, high energy and lots of great ideas. 9.3 Stakeholder Group Snapshots
Committee members to report back on what their stakeholder groups see as important in their engagement with SEAC.
Margaret River Chambers of Commerce and Industry (MRCCI) The MRCCI is one of the key representatives and leading voices of the local business community. Membership and attendance at the SEAC dovetails with the MRCCI’s current strategic plan including supporting the sustainability and continued health of our local businesses. • The MRCCI sees that it is important that in engaging with the SEAC that: • The region's natural environment is recognised as an economic asset which must be sustained and
protected for long-term economic prosperity; • Local businesses should be encouraged to reduce their environmental footprint and be recognised
and rewarded for their efforts to do so; • Many local businesses will be seriously and adversely impacted by changes to the climate and
environmental degradation; • Small businesses in the region must be valued and protected; • Small business diversity is essential for a healthy community - increasing jobs and career
opportunities / maintaining skill diversity / enhancing tourism and appeal, etc; and that • Small businesses should be encouraged and supported and not hindered (red carpet, not red tape) As the MRCCI is a conduit to a significant part of the local business community it can be one of the key bodies to advocate, lobby as well as assist the Shire in its desired outcomes pursuant to the Shire’s Vision 2036 and the key objectives of the Sustainable Economy Strategy which is being developed by the SEO in conjunction with the SEAC. The MRCCI can support the shires approach of having a sustainable, robust and resilient economy by having genuine engagement with an SEO and SEAC on a regular basis to work together on all initiatives and all issues relating to local business development.
129
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 16 MAY 2019
9
The MRCCI is looking forward to working with the SEO and the SEAC to work with the shire and the other members of the SEAC to achieve its objectives so we all can have a future that is sustainable and prosperous for the whole community. Nature Conservation Margaret River Region (NCMRR) The first objective of the Sustainable Economy Advisory Committee is to “recognise the fundamental importance of a healthy natural environment as the most important base for supporting sustainable economic activity in the Shire.”
Nature Conservation Margaret River Region is one of the foremost contributors to the natural environment in the Shire, pursuing a vision of a healthy and biodiverse natural environment supporting the livelihoods and lifestyles on which the region depends.
Nature Conservation Margaret River Region leverages the strength of the community by raising awareness, inspiring commitment and empowering action on behalf of the environment. It does this by combining grassroots community support with sound conservation science and pragmatic policy initiatives, supporting a range of specific conservation programs.
Nature Conservation Margaret River Region is committed to community consultation, collaborative partnerships and an apolitical, results-oriented approach to conservation. It is a not-for-profit organisation, with a voluntary Board, small staff and a voluntary Board, and is funded by (generally program-specific) grants, Shire support and community donations.
Of importance: • Engagement through membership of SEAC, including feedback between SEAC and NCMRR. • One program of NCMRR is the “Giant Light Steps” initiative, including collaborative pursuit of
agreed initiatives. • GLS involves the Shire of Augusta-Margaret River, the Chamber of Commerce, MRBTA,
the Wine Association, South West Catchment Council and Transition Margaret River Digital Economy As a representative of the Digital Economy I do not have a defined group to represent but I believe that I was chosen as I work in the digital field (as a freelance graphic designer, web designer and brand consultant), and also as I work at the Mixtape Creative collaborative workspace on Station Road. Mixtape is one of, if not the first collaborative spaces in the region to focus on the creative/digital sector and was created in 2014. I have been there myself since early 2015 and have created relationships with business owners that represent the fields of graphic design, web design, marketing, events, photography, film, copywriting, user interface, computer development and more. I have reached out to the group recently to let them know that I have joined the SEAC and at this stage we are more interested in understanding how the committee will put procedures in place to make the Economy “more Sustainable”. After only one meeting, it is felt that there is a lot of unknowns and I think we need some more information before we can identify elements that we see as important. Augusta Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ACCI) • Key points for a sustaineble community: • Nature based tourism • Aged caresector • Promote Augusta as a sustainable nature based tourism destination • Main street upgrade with maritime theme to add vibrancy to the town • Ageing demographic • Encourage younger families to liv ein Augusta • Focus on things for young peopl eto do, e.g. move the skatepark to the Colourpatch and create a
family / youth precinct • Complete trail to lighthouse and develop off-road trails to generate longer stays and visitation to
Augusta • As an ageing demographic, volunteer numbers are dropping leaving big gaps in sustaining
community programs
130
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 16 MAY 2019
10
Margaret River Busselton Tourism Association (MRBTA) The MRBTA is a not-for-profit organisation, with more than 700 members and 150 staff across the City of Busselton and Shire of Augusta Margaret River. The MRBTA operates seven tourist attractions – Lake Cave, Mammoth Cave, Jewel Cave, Ngilgi Cave, Cape Leeuwin Lighthouse, Cape Naturaliste Lighthouse and Forest Adventures South West – and manages ground handling at the Busselton Margaret River Airport. The funds generated from its commercial operations allows MRBTA to: • Market the region to intrastate, interstate and international visitors • Undertake visitor servicing through its website, app and visitor centres • Provide high quality attractions • Invest in the conservation of its natural and heritage assets, and help sustain the cultural and
environmental values of the region • Provide employment, support tourism and contribute to the economy of the region MRBTA manages its attractions with a strong commitment to sustainable practices, and seeks to be an exemplar of high quality nature-based tourism experiences. MRBTA employs 5 staff as part of its Conservation and Technical Services team, which are tasked with the environmental management of the sites. Tour guiding staff assist visitors to gain a deeper understanding of the unique places they have come to visit. As a result of these efforts, MRBTA has recently been successful in obtaining Advanced Eco-tourism certification for its cave and lighthouse sites. MRBTA’s marketing and visitor servicing efforts work to inform visitors about what makes the region unique from the perspective of people and place, to encourage visitation which enhances social, environmental and cultural outcomes for the region. Through its engagement with SEAC, MRBTA is seeking to share insights from its own experiences, understand the alignment of its own efforts with the broader community, and play a leadership role with the tourism industry. Just Home • A local economy that looks after everybody, and generates wealth for everyone • Homes for everybody, so that everyone can be employed and fulfil their potential • That any actions taken to strengthen the local economy are equitable and transparent • Keep money local to benefit everyone • Develop a long-term, sustainable, inclusive economy which is innovative and works in synergy
with the environment • Think about ‘economy’ creatively to support sharing and inclusivity – eg, the sharing economy,
barter systems, Buy Nothing, pay it forward, and other models • Take a view of community, diversity and environment in partnership with the economy • Being resourceful and using what we have efficiently • Fair work conditions and living wages • Suggest that Council moves a motion to support a raise in Newstart (many Councils around
Australia have done this). In response to the last dot point, the Chair, Cr McLeod, advised the meeting that the motion be considered after all members had presented their group snapshots. Margaret River Regional Environment Centre (MRREC) MRREC shares the Shires commitment to creating a sustainable community and looks forward to participating in the Shire’s SEAC forum. The Shires Sustainability Policy states that "sustainability has remained elusive”. The relationship between sustainability and conventional economics is of particular interest to MRREC as we believe the two are incompatible; attempts to marry the two will guarantee sustainability remains elusive. Following are some of MRREC’s current thoughts on the matter.
131
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 16 MAY 2019
11
1. Continued growth will continue to erode a finite natural world. There is a need to discuss the “growth
imperative” built into the present economic system. 2. There is an assumption that economic, social and environmental outcomes have equal value and
validity and therefore all outcomes must achieve a balance of the three. The natural world underpins our lives not the economy. Social and environmental outcomes must therefore be prioritised.
3. The notion of prosperity as a positive outcome must also be redefined in social and environment
terms not economic. Modern economics is not a given, it is a recent (in evolutionary terms) evolving social construct that favours short term narrowly defined outcomes over long term social and environmental wellbeing. As mentioned this is unsustainable; as such there is a real need to begin honest conversations that acknowledge this unfolding reality. MRREC hopes SEAC will create a space for such conversations. Cowaramup Retailers Association • The Cowaramup Retailers Association hold monthly meetings where ‘how we can be more
sustainable’ is a regular theme. • Hoping we can bring a snapshot of the collective thought from this group to our group. • There is potential to influence events, leading toward becoming waste free and friendly to the
environment. Margaret River Regional Producers Association (MRRPA) The MRRPA would hope participation in the SEAC could promote and enable sustainable agriculture practises, working with current regulations and procedures that effect small & large scale farmers and food producers, (including but not limited to local/mobile/micro abattoirs, dairy production facilities & food production premises). Sustainable agriculture should also incorporate social and emotional wellbeing of farmers and food producers in the Shire. Transition Margaret River What do the stakeholders in my group (Transition MR) see as important in the engagement with the Committee? What do we bring to the table?
• a world-centric approach applied locally • leading by example, busting the ‘growth myth’ and striving towards a regenerative circular
economy • continually monitoring political decisions made at local, state, federal and global levels with a
view to resolving contradictions and incompatibilities at any level rationally, pragmatically and ethically....
• a focus on community resilience, the environment and sustainability • the optimistic belief and experience that people, when they work together, can change the
systems that they have created • the ability to apply vision and creativity in planning for the future • knowledge, ideas and strategies to identify assets, create networks, engage and educate
people working towards a more sustainable future • the willingness to bravely show leadership working towards the MR region becoming an
educational model of sustainable life (including economy ;-)) These points can both be understood as what Transition offers the committee and what we see as important engaging with Shire. Lower South West Growers Group Margaret River Region formerly Scott River Growers Group Food Producers are constantly dealing with change in agriculture and there is constant pressure on productive farming land from.
1. housing 2. sequestration programs – such as tree farms 3. erosion 4. salinity 5. Acidity
132
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 16 MAY 2019
12
6. Rainfall variability 7. biofuels.
There is also a constant demand for more food production to feed a growing population with less rainfall, cooling climates and less productive land. In the AMR shire we have farming systems that produce a commodity for larger populations and farmers markets who are small backyard and special rural type farmers who produce local food for some local people. We need both systems to feed a growing population and the 100,000s of tourist who come to the region each year. Much of the Scott River Region is a zoned as a Priority Agriculture area which is of State significance. To continue to sustainable farm in our region farmers need assistance with the following:- • Water security for food production and stock requirements. • Investigation and support for value adding of products in the area to support reduction in carbon
miles e.g. dry milk plant. (Beenup Site) • Research on new crops that suit changing climate – cooler at present. • Support and align planning scheme to have crop boxes in Peri urban areas of Augusta Margaret
River Shire – support s farmers markets • Support and align planning scheme to allow the use of micro abattoirs in the AMR Shire. • Better Infrastructure such as all-weather roads. • Social Inclusion of workers and residents • Better connection for mobile phones and wireless infrastructure to better support technology – help
develop/finance mobile repeater systems • Research and development of renewal energy for use on farms- wind, solar. • R/D on carbon incorporation into soils as it is a major element required for plant growth and healthy
soils.- • The use of Section 75A when Shires allow life style properties to be located amongst farming
operations where there is known noise, smell, lights etc to protect farmers from complainants and liturgists.
• Planners who understand and support the requirements for agricultural protection, development and expansion.
• Reduce red tape with planning e.g. simple farm shed approvals very difficult. • Investigate site/ settlement. for workers accommodation Shire President, Cr Pam Townshend, on behalf of Council Sustainability is about what can survive the test of time and make this a better place to live The Shire Council is committed to making thoughtful, evidence-based decisions which is looking after people in the Shire now and for future generations, while attempting to balance the 4 pillars of sustainability: economic, social, cultural and environmental. The Council sustainability vision is about: • Local businesses surviving and thriving, • Our local community - all sections of the community - treated with fairness and support for health
e.g. mental health, • A vibrant and connected community which is inclusive, • Our environment surviving and thriving, This is about us all realising that we are in the same boat
and we all need to support and advocate for each other, and protecting and enhancing the local natural environment.
This requires creativity, innovative thinking, community thinking, and supporting each other in our endeavours. South West Development Commission (SWDC) This submission is informed by the South West Regional Blueprint (2014) which is the guiding document for the SWDC. With regards to sustainability, the Blueprint contains reference to the following aspects:
1. Sustainable Communities 2. Sustainable Growth
133
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 16 MAY 2019
13
3. Sustainable Energy Supply 4. Sustainable Country Towns 5. Sustainable Living Environments 6. Sustainable Development 7. Sustainable Forestry 8. Sustainable Organisations 9. Sustainable Marron Farming 10. Sustainable Dairy Industry
The Blueprint is currently under review and I would hope that the SEAC working group, the Sustainable Economy Strategy can align with the revised Regional Blueprint. In doing so, I would recommend that sustainability be recognised as a Holistic, not a partial concept as it currently appears to be in the 2014 Blueprint. At the very least, the Blueprint could initially inform sectors of the AMR economy, and ultimately the whole economy. At a professional level, I spent 20 years researching and teaching sustainable tourism development and have published widely on the topic in areas including sustainable policies, plans, accreditation programs, enterprises and destinations. Between 2002 and 2012, I founded and directed the Curtin Sustainable Tourism Centre linked nationally to 16 university and 12 industry partners through the Sustainable Tourism Cooperative Research Centre. I have also researched and published widely on the topic of Events and Sustainability. I would suggest that these two sectors, tourism and events, should provide an initial focus for the Shire to transition to economic sustainability and, in doing so, serve as a model for other sectors to emulate. Margaret River Community Centre Inc (MRCC) The representative of the Margaret River Community Centre was an apology for the meeting, however submitted the below snapshot for inclusion in the minutes: The MRCC has nominated to be a member of the Sustainable Economy Advisory Committee as we feel our diverse community centre can add value to the process of transition of the local community to ‘livelihoods and enterprises that are sustainable, climate resilient, diverse and locally-owned”. Our core business is the provision of support services to people in need and the provision of cost-effective rental space to human service agencies that also support those in need in the community. This is done through the maintenance of the original Margaret River Hospital complex as a venue for this to occur. Our contributions to the role and aspiration of the SEAC are as follows;
• The not for profit community centre is a diverse independent grass roots organisation that works to “reduce inequality and social disadvantage” resulting in a more “just community that upholds the rights of everyone”. We will ensure this perspective informs the role of the SEAC
• The MRCC aim to be as economically self-sustainable as possible in managing a heritage listed Shire asset – we do this through rental charges and the operation of a not for profit childcare centre
• Provision of cost-effective rental space for a broad variety of human service agencies, groups and community groups that may otherwise not be able to afford to locate services in Margaret River
• Enables an ‘incubator’ approach for suitable art and food related businesses by providing access to a commercial kitchen and cost-effective room rental, thus allowing many art and food related businesses to test the market
The Chair thanked everyone for their group snapshots.
134
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 16 MAY 2019
14
9.3.1 Just Home Margaret River - Proposed Motion to Increase Newstart The Chair invited Geraldine Clark, on behalf of Just Home Margaret River, to speak to the proposed motion regarding support for a raise in Newstart. MOTION SEAC recommends that Council: 1. Recognises that the low rate of Newstart is exacerbating poverty and homelessness; 2. Publicly advocates in writing to the relevant federal government ministers that the Newstart
Allowance be increased to allow a dignified standard of living; and 3. Sends copies of the letter, advocating that the Newstart Allowance be increased to allow a dignified
standard of living, to the federal MP for Augusta Margaret River and to the senators for Western Australia.
• Currently the minimum wage is not livable. The gap needs to be closed up. • Newstart has not changed for 25 years. • People on Newstart spent 100% of money within the Shire. The Chair suggested the motion be deferred pending further information. MOTION / SEAC DECISION MOVER: CR MCLEOD SECONDER: STEVE CASTAN That the motion be deferred to the 15 August SEAC to allow Just Home provide further information.
CARRIED SEAC2019/7
9.4 Sustainable Economy Strategy
9.4.1 Where the strategy is currently at, what the process for its ongoing development will be, how the committee can be involved
9.4.2 Focused discussion on aspects of the strategy PROCEDURAL MOTION / SEAC DECISION MOTION: CR PAM TOWNSHEND SECONDED: BRITTA SORENSEN That Part 10 of the Standing Orders be suspended to allow for group discussion.
CARRIED SEAC2019/8
The SEAC split into five groups for discussion. PROCEDURAL MOTION / SEAC DECISION MOTION: CR PAM TOWNSHEND SECONDED: BARBARA DUNNET That Part 10 of the Standing Orders be reinstated.
CARRIED 14/0 SEAC2019/9
In the interest of time management, the Chair advised the groups to provide feedback and ideas from group discussion via email to the SEO.
135
SHIRE OF AUGUSTA MARGARET RIVER SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 16 MAY 2019
15
9.4.3 Informal workshop
SEO introduced the item, suggesting the group meet for an informal workshop prior to the next scheduled committee meeting in August. MOTION / SEAC DECISION MOVER: PAM TOWNSHEND SECONDER: KATRINA LOMBARDO That the SEAC meet for an informal workshop in June.
CARRIED SEAC2019/10
9.4.4 Homework – further input into the Strategy from stakeholder group perspective
MOTION / SEAC DECISION MOVED: STUART HICKS SECONDED: BRITTA SORENSEN That Committee members provide input via email in the form of actions/ strategies for the Sustainable Economy Strategy on behalf of their stakeholder groups.
CARRIED SEAC2019/11
10. MATTERS FOR WHICH THE MEETING MAY BE CLOSED
Nil
11. NEXT MEETING
The next Sustainable Economy Advisory Committee meeting will be held on Thursday 15 August 2019, 5.30pm.
12. CLOSURE
The Chair thanked all in attendance and declared the meeting closed at 7.28pm
136