3. INDEX OPERATIONS EFFECTIVENESS COMPONENTS (KPIs) OVERALL
EQUIPMENT EFFECTIVENESS (OEE) MALVINAS OEE PISCO OEE RELIABILITY
BENCH SAFETY RECORDS
4. OPERATIONS EFFECTIVENESS COMPONENTS (KPIs) Utilization /
Production / Throughput (Gas) Availability Reliability Yield /
Recovery (C3) (As a rule of thumb, World-class performers will only
have losses of between 1.5 % to 2 % for all indicators) KPIs : Key
Performance Indicators
5. Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) Objective method to
link three performance indicators: Availability Throughput Yield /
Recovery
6. Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) Can be expressed
simply: OEE = Yield x Throughput x Availability The Maximun
Theoretical World Class - OEE > 85%
7. OEE = Availability X Throughput X Recovery (C3) (Plant Unit)
(Gas) Hr Operatives Actual Throughput Actual yield (C3) Vs Vs Vs Hr
Calendars Best Demonstrated Max Theoretical yield Rate (BDR) (for
BDR) (96 %) (500 MMSCFD) (97.2%) Overall Equipment Effectiveness
(OEE)
8. Cry II Equim. Level; TC II TEx II Estabiliz. Equim. Level nC
1, 2, 3 Cry I Equim. Level; TC I TEx I Unit Level Unit Level Unit
Level Plant Level AvailabilityAsset Plant Level Production Recovery
(yield)X X Overall: O Equipment: E Effectiveness: E OEE = A x P x R
Malvinas Operations
10. OEE 1 FRACTIONATION UNIT Actual Throughput Vs NGL received
from Malvinas THROUGHPUT
11. OEE 1 FRACTIONATION UNIT RECOVERY (Yield) C3/C4 Actual
Yield Vs Design Yield (97.93% Vol) Actual Yield Vs Design Yield
(99.21 % Vol) C3 C4
12. OEE 1-2 FRACTIONATION AND TOPPING UNITS AVAILABILITY Hs
Operatives (Hs Run) Vs Hs Calendars
13. OEE 2 TOPPING UNIT Actual Throughput Vs (NGL received from
Malvinas) x 0.54 THROUGHPUT 0.54 = design fraction of condensate in
NGL from Malvinas
14. Reliability Unplanned downtime (Reactive Maintenance)
Maintenance Backlog Hs Operations Vs Hs Operations + Hs TMR (TMR:
Total Maintenance Reactive) (Reliability; World Class performers
> 98%)
15. RELIABILITY 2006 MALVINAS 99% (Average of 24 main
equipments: Turbocompressors,Turbogenerators, Turboexpanders,
Pumps, Control System) PISCO 97.8% (Average of 20 main equipments:
Turbogenerators, Pumps, Control System, Generators,
Compressors)
21. The Reliability Involves Four Stable Operating Domains
(Source: Ledet Enterprises, Houston Texas) OEE Mal 0.94 OEE Pis
0.93
22. Maintenance Cost vs. Production reliability. Plants with
the best overall equipment effectiveness tend to have the lowest
maintenance cost and use systematic failure elimination,
profit-centered maintenance and performance contracting.
Maintenance Cost Vs. Production Reliability 2007 Malvinas
Pisco
23. Data from the 1998 and 2000 Solomon Associates Inc. surveys
of the participating North and South American refining companies
Availability Performance Comparison 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99
100 1994 1996 1998 2000 2006 Availability RefineryMechanical
Availability- U.S.Trend,% RefineryMechanical Availability-
Pacesetters,% Refinery Operational Availability - U.S. Trend, %
RefineryOperational Availability- Pacesetters,%
AvailabilityMalvinas AvailabilityPisco
24. As a rule of thumb, World-class performers will only have
losses of between 1.5 % to 2 % for all indicators world-class
performers are operating at > 85% of BDR Unavailability both
timing and duration must be predictable. There must be no surprises
Reliability; World Class performers > 98% Availability: world
class performers > 96 %
25. OIL & GAS JOURNAL / May 9, 2005 OEE Method Improves
Condition Based Maintenance Aspen Technology Inc. , Houston Texas
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING / January 2005 Achieving World-Class
Operating Performance Polaris Veritas Inc. , Houston Texas Data
from the 1998 and 2000 Solomon Associates Inc. surveys of the
participating North and South American refining companies - Toward
World Class Plant Availability Tom Ratajczak UOP LLC
References
26. SAFETY RECORDS
27. SAFETY MALVINAS Frequency Index (FI) and Severity Index
(SI) Januray 2006 - August 2007 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
FIAccum. 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 SIAccum.
FI Accum 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.076 0.069 0.062 0.000 3.731 2.340 1.706 1.349 1.119 1.894 1.650
SI Accum 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.014 0.013 0.012 0.000 0.082 0.051 0.038 0.030 0.025 0.049 0.068
Jan-06 Feb-06 M ar-06 Apr-06 M ay- 06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06
Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 M ar-07 Apr-07 M ay-07 Jun-07
Jul-07 Aug-07
28. SAFETY MALVINAS Man Hours Accumulated without Lost Days
September 2006 - August 2007 152,130 0 200,000 400,000 600,000
800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 2,000,000
ManHours MH Worked 119,188 140,611 137,530 165,401 133,332 134,700
159,360 158,760 155,124 152,222 162,622 156,150 MWAccum without
Acc. 1,832,411 MWAccum without Acc. 140,611 278,141 443,542 576,874
MWAccum without Acc. 134,700 294,060 452,820 607,944 760,166
MWAccum without Acc. 152,130 308,280 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06
Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 760,16693
518,787 1'832,411 308,280
29. SAFETY PISCO Frequency Index (FI) and Severity Index (SI)
January 2006 - August 2007 0.00 0.75 1.50 2.25 3.00 3.75 4.50 5.25
6.00 6.75 SI 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 FI Severity Index 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Frequency Index 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 Jan-06 Feb-06 M ar-06 Apr-06 M ay-06 Jun-06 Jul-06
Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 M ar-07 Apr-07 M
ay-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07