3 responses to

3 Responses to "Illegal Bangladeshi immigrants in India…"

Mangesh chakole Rating: said this on 02 Sep 2010 8:22:11 AM CDT the topic is very excellent ...we need to discuss this topic ..because its a global topic ...as a indian citizen we need to look into it ...the government should take the strict action regarding the bang immigrants...because its afterall about the distructing the integrity of our nation..and if we dont get worry about such situations then the time will not be away when there are the chances that we could loose our independence because we are already suffering a lot due to the terrorist acts and if this devils get assosiate with each other then there can be a greatest threat to our nation.(Reply to this comment)

Mangesh Chakole Rating: said this on 02 Sep 2010 8:28:45 AM CDT the very important thing is that the gov should try to improve the relationship with the bang because if we want to go global and if we think regarding the globalization then it is must to take the other countries along with u and u should try best to improve the relations with the neibouring country as we have always been trying to do with the pak..but if the matter is not in hand then the strict measures are need to be taken because nowadays the the bang activities are increasing ....(Reply to this comment)

deepa Rating: said this on 09 Dec 2011 1:56:07 PM CDT I liked the content on this site. Would like to visit again. Visit shilpbazaar dot com(Reply to this comment)Excellent topic to discuss.(Reply to this comment)

NINNU Rating: said this on 15 Jan 2010 1:00:46 PM CDT We cant say womens r better managers bt we can say womens r more successful managers.From their childhood,they are teached to manage small-small things 4m their wadrobes to kitchen to organisations.Management lies in the blood of womens,thus they can manage better than a men.4 a men,its a duty n responsibility to get succed n to get fame-name-money,bt 4 a women it is a part of life.(Reply to this comment)

UTSAV Rating: said this on 25 Aug 2010 10:37:40 PM CDT I do not agree with ninnu. women cannot become good manager,B'Z they are very emotional. and manager requires must be control it's emotions i.e becomes emotional inteligent; and this qualitiy have in men only. so, men can do that do not can do by women; B'Z there are lot of difference between manage family and manage company.(Reply to this comment)

http://e-sparc.com/commentrss.php?contentid=2344&type=article

soniya Rating: said this on 29 Aug 2010 1:57:26 PM CDT i m totally disagree with utsav for example soniya gandhi who is managing our country not imotionlly she has a power n skills no doubt women managers can be better managers(Reply to this comment)

snigdha Rating: said this on 01 Sep 2010 5:52:22 PM CDT Women as a manager are much more successful and better than man.There is a long list of women who hav set flags in d area of managing.Reason women are laborious,serious toward their goals.As far as emotions is concerned there exist no human in d world who hav no emotions, and If there exist such living beings den they are animals.Even animals too hav emotions.Managing skills require prpper blending of all d qualities and emotion is one of its ingrediant Managing is all about d proper utlilization of resources. and If u know dat U r gud manager.Women are much skilled in managing ,they think from all d angles,they are sincere ,serious .(Reply to this comment)

surendra kumar rakse Rating: said this on 17 Jan 2010 4:52:04 PM CDT this is absolutely rediculus, this is not truth, i accept that in comparision to men, most of the women are sincere but only in quantity, i.e. in large number, you see that in iim's and iit's most of the seats are filled by men, thats why men are more intellegent than women, in term of management still women are behind, women can only be a good manager, when she is a good human being, not jeleous of men, because I saw that women when gets a position, she missuse it, she just think that, in this male schavenist country, she got a way to make men a looser.(Reply to this comment)

ANURAG Rating: said this on 03 Feb 2010 10:40:26 AM CDT yes its true they feel jealous but it not only found in women it can be found even inside men. I agree to some extent wat you said but i think NINNU had thrown the light on chracteristics found in INDIA thus women from similar culture are said to be born managers. Now if we talk about Corporate world they are getting jobs on basis of looks as well as there management as they can easily solve conflicts as compared to men. Lady bridge in conflicts make conflicts solve easier thus reduces complexity. Even for managing tasks which requires less intelligency they are ahead of us.So wat you said of jealousy is not excepted.(Reply to this comment)

dipti Rating: said this on 05 Feb 2010 8:20:06 PM CDT pathetic response.first of all, its scientifically proven that men n women have equal brains.infact women have 6th sense n have an edge over men.management means art of managing people & women are well equipped with this art.secondly, men's level of jealously goes upto killing his enemy.you are diverging frm the topic.(Reply to this comment)

deepak kuntal Rating: said this on 24 Mar 2012 8:30:12 AM CDT i liked your reply dipti,what do u do and where do u live?(Reply to this comment)

midi Rating: said this on 07 Feb 2010 9:27:52 PM CDT there is always the hand of a woman behind the success a man .and women are more responsible and have managerial capability than men .they never misuse their position u can see the example of our president mrs.pritiba patil ,Indra Gandhi they alwys thought aboutthe development of our country. the development of india dont depend on only men. If both work together and give their best then our india will be on the highest peak of the growth(Reply to this comment)

sakshi Rating: said this on 02 Mar 2011 11:46:26 PM CDT ur comment in itself shows that how much jealous u r with girls progress...because of people like women are still lagging behind in some fields..otherwise if given chance women can beat men in seconds....And iim's and iit's are the only place to judge mens superiority....and because u were jealous of the women u saw going above ur level so u thought that she is jealous and trying to misuse her position but actually u r misusing ur right of democracy by saying ill things abt her which is part of ur nature not her.....i hope u got it Mr Male chauvinist(Reply to this comment)

sakshi Rating: said this on 02 Mar 2011 11:49:14 PM CDT ur comment in itself shows that how much jealous u r with girls progress...because of people like women are still lagging behind in some fields..otherwise if given chance women can beat men in seconds....And iim's and iit's are the only place to judge mens superiority....and because u were jealous of the women u saw going above ur level so u thought that she is jealous and trying to misuse her position but actually u r misusing ur right of democracy by saying ill things abt her which is part of ur nature not her.....i hope u got it Mr Male chauvinist(Reply to this comment)

sakshi Rating: said this on 02 Mar 2011 11:53:56 PM CDT ur comment in itself shows that how much jealous u r with girls progress...because of people like U women are still lagging behind in some fields..otherwise if given chance women can beat men in seconds....And iim's and iit's are not the only place to judge mens superiority....and because u were jealous of the women u saw going above ur level so u thought that she is jealous and trying to misuse her position but actually u r misusing ur right of democracy by saying ill things abt her which is part of ur nature not her.....i hope u got it Mr Male chauvinist(Surendar kumar)(Reply to this comment)

Satyajit Rating:

said this on 20 Oct 2011 5:08:11 PM CDT wonderful view(Reply to this comment)

surendra kumar rakse Rating: said this on 27 May 2012 10:09:57 PM CDT please ignore this para, thank you(Reply to this comment)

Anu Rating: said this on 08 Mar 2010 10:24:27 PM CDT i agree to all the girls above. it is always said behind every successful man der is woman , why do dey say dat , der must be some reason behind that phrase. men and women are equal in evry way . presently women are m0re hard working and successfullya said by midi. Earlier women were not given a chance to show their talent n now dey r .(Reply to this comment)

Rasik Rating: said this on 27 Apr 2010 7:05:36 AM CDT Yeah i feel women could turn out to be better managers than men having given them chance to do so.....they could challenge us equally in every field.There are some mis-conceptions that we do't find much girls in mba colleges as compared to boys..the reason is they are encouraged to have early marriage which is more valid if we take the case of our country,india.And regarding your statement Anu "Behind every successful man there is women" i do not agree with this but yeah we could work together then we could do better as compared to doing it alone.(Reply to this comment)

sudha Rating: said this on 12 Mar 2010 11:43:54 PM CDT i think surendra is not right,she has some personal renenge from womenn,nd the language is also very abusive in respect to a women.(Reply to this comment)

devendra Rating: said this on 19 Apr 2010 3:48:58 PM CDT I think skills and qualities are not respective to any sex.These are born as well as developed.Therefore there is no need to quarrel on this topic. Both are excellent managers as it depends upon the person.(Reply to this comment)

Midhun Rating: said this on 22 Apr 2010 2:53:35 PM CDT Guys, The topic is "Are women managers better managers…" and not "Are women managers better managers THAN men…"(Reply to this comment)

arun Rating: said this on 02 May 2010 10:07:24 AM CDT i do not agree this topic because women has not suitable for this job....besides man nd

women both r equal mind skills and other capablities..bt some work r only for specific gender.men already know that how to do work from other.women r only for clerical job not for managing job..men r concious regarding his job..so we can say that managing job only for men's not for women's(Reply to this comment)

archana Rating: said this on 09 Jul 2010 2:14:30 PM CDT m not agree with aruns' opinion because we hv seen so many examples of managing job that women r doing in our country like CEO indira nooyi ,kiran mazumdar shaw chairman & MD of biocon ltd, Ritu Kumar Fashion Designer.... etc etc all these women are leaders in their respective field.so making statement like "women r only for clerical job not for managing job" is ridiculous.(Reply to this comment)

pradeep reddy Rating: said this on 05 May 2010 9:50:20 AM CDT this thing called a job suitable for only a particular gender is not an existing thing in world well common man it is proved already that any job a man can do ,can be done by a woman too and so come the woman manager so ,and only if the person has good leader ship qualities ,a team player enough a woman can perfectly do it and we can see Chanda Kochar CEO of ICICI bank(Reply to this comment)

golu Rating: said this on 19 Feb 2011 11:28:42 PM CDT hello frnz according to me women s good managers but cant say that better then men ok first of all we should have clear sight that managing in different field is different task if some people think that management in home is the only management then it is wrong i guess. although women are good in home coz there she have to manage her home only but one can easily think that a family without man suffers lots than a family without woman for managing household works women are good but for issues of outside home there need a man to solve them now in corporate world women are also doing good but as compare to men they have less guts coz the society is men society .and if we talk about fact and figures there is no need to compate that how big managers are men and how are women. and if somebody above saying that it is proved that women and men have same mine then it is not correct coz women are good scholars coz they have theoretical mind , they can cramp things easily but if we talk about practical mind or technical mind boys have more both cases have exceptions . so at last we can say that women are good managers and they are rising rapidly but we cant say that they are better than men managers(Reply to this comment)

bhavitha Rating: said this on 13 Aug 2010 4:41:40 PM CDT Well this topic seems to be some what different because how come sincerity and successes depend on a gender. Successes depends on person and his contribution to the work and the organization it do sent depend whether a women or men leading the team i depends how good a person is in extracting the work from his/her subordinates.(Reply to this comment)

Raviranjan kumar singh Rating: said this on 01 Sep 2010 9:53:26 PM CDT I think both contain the equal brain and no one can tale that who is excellent in the particular field of management. It's a very fact that women to be much serious than men towards her goal if she get the right opportunity but It's also the fact that men also contain an excellent brain.. . it also depends upon the specific field of the management. both can do the best. it also depend upon the caliber and the smartness of mind . exception exist every were(Reply to this comment)

Divya N. Rating: said this on 11 Oct 2010 11:14:44 PM CDT Skills do not depend upon gender. I hardly disagree with those stating that women can be better managers; or those stating the contrary. If one is dedicated towards his/her goals in life then there is nothing standing the way between that person and his/her goals. Reaching your goals is also a management in its own way. Women today are no far less off than men. Indra Nooyi, CEO of Pepsico, Chanda Kochar, CEO of ICICI Bank - it clearly shows how good women with men by their side.(Reply to this comment)

Divya N. Rating: said this on 11 Oct 2010 11:14:45 PM CDT Skills do not depend upon gender. I hardly disagree with those stating that women can be better managers; or those stating the contrary. If one is dedicated towards his/her goals in life then there is nothing standing the way between that person and his/her goals. Reaching your goals is also a management in its own way. Women today are no far less off than men. Indra Nooyi, CEO of Pepsico, Chanda Kochar, CEO of ICICI Bank - it clearly shows how good women with men by their side.(Reply to this comment)

sarah Rating: said this on 24 Jan 2011 7:50:55 PM CDT THE HAND THAT ROCKS THE CRADLE RULES THE WORLD !(Reply to this comment)

Raj Rating: said this on 11 Sep 2011 1:02:09 AM CDT I agree with ninnu that women are born manager and they have excellent skills to manage. i don't agree with utsav that women are very emotional and can bring problems on the contrary they get very rigid to do ''what must be done'' after they get a experience of in that field but one thing is sure that men are ahead of women in some ways that the women manager cann't handle the their female colleague as men can handle they get very easily jealous of there colleague. They also have a demerit especially in India that they have to carry household chores which leave them very less time in day to day activity which leave them with a few innovations in management unlike there other counterpart outside india. I believe if given equal oppertunity to women with men they certainly have a edge over meni feel that the issues regarding global warming are catching everyone eyes these days... so jobs like energy conservation measures are the ones to be looked out for(Reply to this comment)

Raviranjan kumar singh Rating:

said this on 01 Sep 2010 10:01:45 PM CDT Bpo/kpo will be the upcoming profession more than the other sectors because all categories are required for this if the common thing communication skill is good. we also know that after globalization due to bpo/kpo our economy condition and unemployment maintain more than the previous season.(Reply to this comment)

Pallavi Rating: said this on 01 Dec 2010 7:55:15 PM CDT I believe science research based profession and also legal based profession will be the upcoming professions as our country currently to go ahead need innovation and to protect them we need the legalhelp in terms of Intellectual property rights .(Reply to this comment)

Jaleel Hasfar Rating: said this on 06 Mar 2012 8:13:00 PM CDT Surely Science will not be. Contact me, If you will be in 2020. Thanks. +91-9003203040(Reply to this comment)

Sana Rating: said this on 24 Apr 2012 11:49:43 AM CDT How dare u'll put ur mobile no.(Reply to this comment)

Swayam Rating: said this on 17 Jan 2011 10:28:20 AM CDT I think things are changing day by day.software related jobs,jobs related with human life(as biotech.,micrebio.,genetics etc) and the jobs which implements modern science(like nanotechnology,research in medicine etc.).but if we looks through previous decades we could see the basic jobs like teaching, scientist, doctoring, engineering etc never faced a saturation.I think in future also these jobs will give us a better future.(Reply to this comment)

siva Rating: said this on 20 Sep 2011 11:45:01 AM CDT superbbbbbbbb(Reply to this comment)

Jaleel Hasfar Rating: said this on 06 Mar 2012 8:07:57 PM CDT Aircraft, Civil, Electrical and Architectural will lead the world. I think those four disciplines in Engineering will never get any upset in future. Source: Future Profession, Internet. Ph: +91-9003203040. Thanks All(Reply to this comment)

dsw vouchers Rating: said this on 27 Jul 2012 4:13:03 PM CDT Great site you have here but I was curious if you knew of any message boards that cover the same topics discussed here? I'd really love to be a part of online community where I can get opinions from other knowledgeable people that share the same interest. If you have any

recommendations, please let me know. Thanks!(Reply to this comment)

reverse phone number Rating: said this on 29 Jul 2012 12:10:27 AM CDT There are a few interesting points soon enough in this posting but I do not recognize if I see all of themcenter to heart. There is some validity but Ill take hold opinion until I consider it further. Good writeup , thanks and then we want much more! Added to FeedBurner at the same time(Reply to this comment)

Do you think India is the biggest victim of Financial Crisis

By Moderator .. Published 02/11/2010 National Group Discussion topics Rating:

There are some arguments that India is not a victim of recession. These lines turned as illusions according to United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) survey. United nations estimates that financial crisis hit India and make Indians lively hood worse.

Spread The Word del.icio.us it Digg this Furl Reddit Yahoo! this! StumbleUpon Google Bookmarks Live Favorites Technorati

15 Responses to "Do you think India is the biggest victim of Financial Crisis" zubi Rating:

said this on 17 Feb 2010 9:35:48 PM CDT

According to me india is not one amongst those countries which were severly affected by what we call global recession , it offcourse has some effects but upto some extent , the main reason for this is

http://e-sparc.com/articles/2413/1/Do-you-think-India-is-the-biggest-victim-of-Financial-Crisis/aaa

http://www.technorati.com/faves?add=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F2413%2F1%2FDo-you-think-India-is-the-biggest-victim-of-Financial-Crisis%2FPage1.html

https://favorites.live.com/quickadd.aspx?marklet=1&mkt=en-us&url=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F2413%2F1%2FDo-you-think-India-is-the-biggest-victim-of-Financial-Crisis%2FPage1.html&title=Do+you+think+India+is+the+biggest+victim+of+Financial+Crisis&top=1

http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark?op=edit&bkmk=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F2413%2F1%2FDo-you-think-India-is-the-biggest-victim-of-Financial-Crisis%2FPage1.html&title=Do+you+think+India+is+the+biggest+victim+of+Financial+Crisis

http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F2413%2F1%2FDo-you-think-India-is-the-biggest-victim-of-Financial-Crisis%2FPage1.html&title=Do+you+think+India+is+the+biggest+victim+of+Financial+Crisis

http://myweb2.search.yahoo.com/myresults/bookmarklet?title=Do+you+think+India+is+the+biggest+victim+of+Financial+Crisis&u=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F2413%2F1%2FDo-you-think-India-is-the-biggest-victim-of-Financial-Crisis%2FPage1.html&popup=true

http://reddit.com/submit?title=Do+you+think+India+is+the+biggest+victim+of+Financial+Crisis&url=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F2413%2F1%2FDo-you-think-India-is-the-biggest-victim-of-Financial-Crisis%2FPage1.html

http://www.furl.net/storeIt.jsp?t=Do+you+think+India+is+the+biggest+victim+of+Financial+Crisis&u=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F2413%2F1%2FDo-you-think-India-is-the-biggest-victim-of-Financial-Crisis%2FPage1.html

http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&title=Do+you+think+India+is+the+biggest+victim+of+Financial+Crisis&url=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F2413%2F1%2FDo-you-think-India-is-the-biggest-victim-of-Financial-Crisis%2FPage1.html&bodytext=%3Ctitle%3EHTML+clipboard%3C%2Ftitle%3EThere+are+some+arguments+that+India+is+not+a+victim+of%26nbsp%3B+recession.+These+lines+%0D%0Aturned+as+illusions+according+to+United+Nations+Department+of+Economic+and+%0D%0ASocial+Affairs+(UNDESA)+survey.+United+nations+estimates+that+financial+crisis+%0D%0Ahit+India+and+make+Indians+lively+hood+worse.+

http://del.icio.us/post?title=Do+you+think+India+is+the+biggest+victim+of+Financial+Crisis&url=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F2413%2F1%2FDo-you-think-India-is-the-biggest-victim-of-Financial-Crisis%2FPage1.html

http://e-sparc.com/categories/GD-TOPICS-WITH-ANSWERS/National--Group-Discussion-topics/

http://e-sparc.com/authors/1/Moderator-..


the policies which were done by the central government to handle such a pressure situation...

(Reply to this comment)

reghuramsreedharan Rating:


according to my view i will not agree with th statement.i dont think that,our central govt seriously taken that as a danger and manmohan's govt effectevely over come that situation


Monodeep Rating:

said this on 15 Mar 2010 12:49:11 PM CDT

according to my point of view indian govt shold think for the general and poor customer and as well as middle level customer and handle the situation in such a way so that indian economy remain stronger and the price of daily use essential commoditis be in reach of general customer.


RIMIT Rating:

said this on 08 Apr 2010 7:44:43 PM CDT

exactly iam totaly agree govt shud think about the middle level at certain time here was some recession,govt tried to tackle that but thier policies were not enough!!!


Surya Prakash Chaudhary Rating:

said this on 01 Jun 2010 11:19:22 AM CDT

up to a little extent am agree with you but i think that we common people are much responsible towards the government policies. if we don't waste our resourses with proper management then schenario would be different


PARUL Rating:


NOT EXACTLY , AS THIS GLOBAL RECUSSION HAS TREMENDIOUS IMPACT ON DEVELOPED COUNTRY ALSO LIKE UNITED STATES .ALTHOUGH INDIA CAN NOT BE KEEP APART FROM THIS CRISES BUT CIRCUMSTANCES ARE NOT BEYONED CONTROL. GOVT HAS IMPLEMENTED REFORMS STRATEGIES THAT HELPS TO TACKLE THE CONDITION TO SOME EXTENT. EVEN INDIA HAS PROVIDED RELIEF TO DEVELOPED COUNTRY BY PROVIDINDG FUNDS TO WORLD BANK.


saranya natarajan Rating:

said this on 03 Jun 2010 2:13:07 PM CDT

as per my view in our country preference should be given to the poor pupil. even though the govt offers many thing which ll be helpful to the poor but it doesnt reach the poor because of the irresponsible officials which makes the poor more poorer.


wert Rating:


as per my view in our country preference should be given to the poor pupil. even though the govt offers many thing which ll be helpful to the poor but it doesnt reach the poor because of the irresponsible officials which makes the poor more poorer.


Bandana Rating:


Yes i am quite satisfy with you because every coin has two faces.Like as there is irresponsible officials activity but a part of that if some poor pupil got the benefits, they still want to sit and wait for the next helpful steps they dont want to grown up there situation so,i think both party should be responsible.


shabnam Rating:

said this on 01 Jul 2010 11:49:22 AM CDT

yes exactly govt. has taken sevearl steps to overcome the situation n helpful hand to poor but its not reaching to them...govt should take care that there help must reach to poor


Richa Arora Rating:

said this on 14 Aug 2010 12:53:21 PM CDT

Inequalities of Income has religiously been a part of India. So the Global Recession has not hit India in that aspect as much as in other aspects. Because it originated in US the effects that have cascaded are more in terms of International Business getting affectewherein the outsourcedbusiness is being lost by India. Acc ording to me the worst hit is US not INDIA.


Sudha Rating:

said this on 02 Sep 2010 7:58:16 PM CDT

Its about how govt is handling the sitaution and how public is accepting it. But now a days no politician is bothered about people or country. And about recession - yes it affected india , cant say if it was more or less. As many people from bpo were fired and were not getting any jobs.


sidhartha sankar parida Rating:


in my point of view the main cause behind economic crisis is insincerity of workers,the selfish thinking of politicians and the misunderstanding between govt. and public.i agree with the statement that india is suffering very much by crisis.because ,since it is not a highly developed country,and most of the Indian population depends upon govt and private services hence they get affected during crisis.


kumarmanohar Rating:

said this on 07 Dec 2010 4:27:56 PM CDT

ya ,mainly in India IT Industries which are globalised and other just started growing for global standards have much impact of recession because people from India who recruited in USA had faced the recession effect and packed back to INDIA.so ,Manily IT Industries tasted deep the effect of recession


raj Rating:

said this on 22 Nov 2011 6:13:43 AM CDT

i agree that it industries are mainly affected by the recession. but india is able to save himself from the recession.Now india is able to help others country like USA to over come from the situation. india is still register growth in this critical situation. it is a strong point consider.

Effect Of Western Culture On Indian Youth

By Moderator .. Published 04/2/2006 GD TOPICS WITH ANSWERS Rating:

” Effect Of Western Culture On Indian Youth "Replies:

Posted By: pavani

How there is head and tail for a coin, there is both positive and negative impact of western culture on India and especially on Indian youth,

In past in India men were our traditional dresses, but now it is entirely changed, now the Indian youth moving with jeans, t-shirts, minis, micros, etc., here we can proud of that western culture, it bringing us with the fast moving world.

But when we consider the pubs, it is the thing to be strictly punished. In pubs both men and women are in drastic stage, by taking drugs, it should be punished. And we need to felt sorry for that.

And there r many things to be taken from the western culture.

Posted By: navedkhan05

http://e-sparc.com/categories/GD-TOPICS-WITH-ANSWERS/GD-TOPICS-WITH-ANSWERS/


THERE HAS BEEN AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF EFFECT OF WESTERN CULTURE ON US. IT CAN BE EASILY FELT BY THE FOOD, ATTIRE AND WAY OF LIVING OF CITIZENS.SPECIALLY ON DRESSES IT HAS MADE ADVERSE EFFECTS. SO IT IS NOT GOOD FOR OUR CULTURE.OUR YOUNG GIRLS ARE WEARING SKIRTS, MICROS, AND MINIS ETC. WHICH EXCITES THE BOYS LEADING TO SOME SERIOUS CRIMES SUCH AS RAPE ETC. BUT ON THE FLIPPER SIDE THE WAYS OF LIVING HAS BEEN GREATLY ENHANCED WHICH IS GOOD FOR SUCCESS AND GROWTH OF THE COUNTRY AND HELPFUL FOR IT IN HEADING TOWARDS SUPER POWER AHEAD OF USA. SO I FEEL THAT IT HAS BOTH GOOD AND BAD EFFECTS

Posted By: ulty

I Strongly believe that there is a substantial influence of western culture on Indian youths. Mere mention of the word 'India' signifies a place of cultural heritage as well as diversity. But the cultural legacy that we are showing to the whole world is becoming a thing of history in metropolitan cities.

On one side we enjoy our so-called rich culture and really admire it but on the other side we find discotheques full of young guys and girls. Secondly, Joint family tradition; one of the biggest assets of India is now vanishing under the shadow of the so-called western culture. Nuclear families are taking place of many years' old values. Youth of today is more interested in their privacy rather than enjoying their lives with others. Individualization has broken up the joint family system, paving way for the youth to fall prey to drug addiction. This stage is the most vulnerable period of life where the youth need guidance, counseling, education and care by parents.

So how did we get part of their culture over here, you ask, their culture has become over popularized here, through electronic media that everyone wants to be just like them. Because of that India has lost her identity from all other countries. We’ve now become a copy – cat to all other nations and we may lose our individuality. The reason is because, we want another image, we don’t want to be the olden – day - traditional country, which still hasn’t become the so - called ‘modern’, even in the 21st century. We don’t want to look like imposters to all other well – developed countries. If you have ever thought of that, erase that thought because the image we’ve got planted in our minds is terribly wrong. India is not an imposter to other nations, it never has been, but will if the people of today continue to do everything they see on cable TV.

India is an independent country now and has been for a while, with no such problems. The reason behind that is because our ancestors fought for us, so that we could have a future in our own way, not with any other way, which we are not used to. I’m not saying that India should stop everything they’ve learnt from western countries, but to have some individuality from other nations and to set an example to the other 3rd world countries and give out the message that there are other nations to set an example on.

So, for the people who fought for us, for India to keep her dignity and to be a leader to other countries, we the people of today must be our own country and not be some other country, which we’re not. Everyone is his or her own countryman - why can’t we be our own as well?

Should the public sector be privatized?

By Moderator . Published 03/24/2006 GD TOPICS WITH ANSWERS Rating:

Should the public sector be privatized?Replies:

Posted By: meenakshisekar

Yes of course privatization of public sectors leads to some healthy changes in an org. b's when you take public sectors u can find some slackness (or a little bit) delay in their services. But in case of private since service is there first and foremost duty they act rapidly.

Posted By: ssrkraju

Hi All,

Privatization of public sector. Lot depends of which sector we are talking about. Let me clarify few doubts in the primary stage. Can we expect all private hospitals in our cities in our town which do not have an entry for poor people, can we have only private sector telephone companies, can we have private companies have complete control on oil reserves, can we have all transport be provided by private sector and RTC vanishes, can we expect an private sector to take care of our defense. In the same way we cant expect the government to set up an IT industry on its own, we cant expect them to handle all the load of flight transport. My point over here is both are not mutually exclusive. We need to accept the fact that both are here to stay and we cannot make it without one. They do have their importance and we need to deal this issue according to the context.

There are some strategic sectors, which need to be under control of Indian government like oil/gas sector. The subsidy we enjoy will be never provided by a private sector. The government in this case helps its citizens to a great extent and making them available to its citizens. The ration card system is a great boon to the poor. Coming to some sectors like steel and mobile where both are


http://e-sparc.com/authors/3/Moderator-.

present and a healthy competition among them always benefits the customers. It is also a point to be noted that Government itself cannot take the complete load just like it cant take the load of all flight customers where private sector is playing its helping role. Then there is education sector, which also has good competition with CBSE matching with any education system of either state syllabus or the schools coming up with their own syllabus. The public transport sector too is a mix of public and private and here you can see a striking difference. You can easily differentiate the profit motive of private personal whose salaries depend on the profit to their owner. In autos you can see some 6-8 people are dumped then starts the engine. I do accept that some services are best in private sector as they fear their job loss and their owners do get the best out of them by making them to work more no. Of hours.

The lazy mindset of some public sector could be taken into account to convert it to a private sector. I would like to suggest that counseling sessions for these to have a better future by working for the organization would help it to grow better and be under the public sector umbrella. We can take some examples by some of our previous strategies, which helped us to renovate dull companies, which lacked in performance. If a private individual is going to buy the company and could change its fortunes, why can't the public government do it? It can. Running away from a trouble is not a solution. Facing it head-on will produce better results.

Posted By: mallika_pillai

I totally agree with Mr.ssrkraju.... As he said it depends on which sector we are talking about. And both have a different importance of their own. Privatization has its own proms and public sector have their own. I think both needs to be there as far today’s development is concerned.

Taking the view it is right that the work at public sectors is not working the way it should. But if everyone understands the responsibilities then it can also work the same way as private sectors. Again I think for some sectors it is ok otherwise it should be done by the respected ones itself...

POST YOUR VIEWS ON THIS TOPIC ......

Spread The Word del.icio.us it Digg this Furl Reddit Yahoo! this! StumbleUpon Google Bookmarks Live Favorites

https://favorites.live.com/quickadd.aspx?marklet=1&mkt=en-us&url=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F19%2F1%2FShould-the-public-sector-be-privatized%2FPage1.html&title=Should+the+public+sector+be+privatized%3F&top=1

http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark?op=edit&bkmk=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F19%2F1%2FShould-the-public-sector-be-privatized%2FPage1.html&title=Should+the+public+sector+be+privatized%3F

http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F19%2F1%2FShould-the-public-sector-be-privatized%2FPage1.html&title=Should+the+public+sector+be+privatized%3F

http://myweb2.search.yahoo.com/myresults/bookmarklet?title=Should+the+public+sector+be+privatized%3F&u=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F19%2F1%2FShould-the-public-sector-be-privatized%2FPage1.html&popup=true

http://reddit.com/submit?title=Should+the+public+sector+be+privatized%3F&url=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F19%2F1%2FShould-the-public-sector-be-privatized%2FPage1.html

http://www.furl.net/storeIt.jsp?t=Should+the+public+sector+be+privatized%3F&u=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F19%2F1%2FShould-the-public-sector-be-privatized%2FPage1.html

http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&title=Should+the+public+sector+be+privatized%3F&url=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F19%2F1%2FShould-the-public-sector-be-privatized%2FPage1.html&bodytext=%3CSPAN+style%3D%22FONT-SIZE%3A+11pt%3B+FONT-FAMILY%3A+Georgia%22%3E%3CFONT+color%3D%23000000%3EYes+of+course+privatization+of+public+sectors+leads+to+some+healthy+changes+in+an+org.+b's+when+you+take+public+sectors+u+can+find+some+slackness+(or+a+little+bit)+delay+in+their+services.+But+in+case+of+private+since+service+is+there+first+and+foremost+duty+they+act+rapidly.%3C%2FFONT%3E+%3C%2FSPAN%3E

http://del.icio.us/post?title=Should+the+public+sector+be+privatized%3F&url=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F19%2F1%2FShould-the-public-sector-be-privatized%2FPage1.html

Technorati

Related Articles

Indian villages - our strength or our weakness? VALENTIN E'S DAY!! Advantages & Disadvantages along with your opinion What ails Indian sports? Infosys placement paper 37 Infosys placement paper - 15 Indian villages-our strength or our weakness? Quality is a myth in India. How green was my valley..Are we paying the price of nature? Indian customs-are we in a time warp? US war on Iraq-justified or not Foreign Television Channels are destroying our culture Bush trip to India - Advantages & Disadvantages

164 Responses to "Should the public sector be privatized?"

yamendra Rating:

said this on 16 Jan 2007 4:55:15 AM CDT

good


Harshit Jain Rating:

said this on 09 Aug 2008 11:37:17 AM CDT

Well friends, as we all know that most of the government units are known for their poor service level, that is why the private organisations are came in picture and even making huge profits out of the same customer base. The basic reason behind is the level of understanding, it means the junior level, middle level and the senior level management are not as much sharp or I should say not as professional as the private sector's all the level of management. Even the environment of the organisation is also matters. By this point i just want to say that at each level of an organisation there should be an educated and highly professional person needs to be there. If we look at the features responsible for the success of private organisations we came to know that they at every level of management you will find a highly qualified and professional manager, and they set-up all the problems at their own level, so it is nothing but the power dilution and even the highest authority is wholly responsible for all the actions taken at every level of management.

http://e-sparc.com/articles/20/1/Bush-trip-to-India---Advantages--Disadvantages/Page1.html

http://e-sparc.com/articles/21/1/Foreign-Television-Channels-are-destroying-our-culture/Page1.html

http://e-sparc.com/articles/22/1/US-war-on-Iraq-justified-or-not/Page1.html

http://e-sparc.com/articles/23/1/Indian-customs-are-we-in-a-time-warp/Page1.html

http://e-sparc.com/articles/24/1/How-green-was-my-valleyAre-we-paying-the-price-of-nature/Page1.html

http://e-sparc.com/articles/25/1/Quality-is-a-myth-in-India/Page1.html

http://e-sparc.com/articles/26/1/Indian-villages-our-strength-or-our-weakness/Page1.html

http://e-sparc.com/articles/67/1/Infosys-placement-paper---15/Page1.html

http://e-sparc.com/articles/106/1/Infosys-placement-paper-37/Page1.html

http://e-sparc.com/articles/452/1/What-ails-Indian-sports/Page1.html

http://e-sparc.com/articles/453/1/VALENTIN-ES-DAY-Advantages--Disadvantages-along-with-your-opinion/Page1.html

http://e-sparc.com/articles/455/1/Indian-villages---our-strength-or-our-weakness/Page1.html

http://www.technorati.com/faves?add=http%3A%2F%2Fe-sparc.com%2Farticles%2F19%2F1%2FShould-the-public-sector-be-privatized%2FPage1.html



Rasik Rating:

said this on 27 Apr 2010 6:09:33 AM CDT

Yea i agree with you,but if we take case of india..80% of the population is rural so they will be able to afford to get operated in private hospitals.We need to improve our public service facilities and all that is needed is govt. to take a step forword so that we can expect better in future.So lots of pts needs to be considered before privatising market.


nikhil Rating:

said this on 14 May 2010 11:21:02 AM CDT

this is the fact in rural area.people cant afford to pay


Nupur Rastogi Rating:


hello friends, In my opinion,its depend on which sector to be privatised.Because if we talk about private hospitals a poor or a middle person cannot afford their medical services.But its true that good quality of services are provided by private sectors as compared to pubkic sector. Even some people who are working in public sector use rough language to the customers which is very bad.And in private sectors customers are treated in a very good manner and grievances are handled in quickly also.


anupma gupta Rating:


i am agree with Nupur Rastogi b/c it have given the best exp to differentiate between them.it is true that private sector have good facility for all thing bt i cant ignore to public sector b/c many of the poor person who have no money for mediciene they take the help to public sector.so i think both are important in own position

http://e-sparc.com/articles/19/1/Should-the-public-sector-be-privatized/e-sparc.com


Nutan Rating:

said this on 17 May 2011 10:53:07 PM CDT

i also agry with this point,both public & private scetors are important to their position


tara Rating:

said this on 19 Mar 2011 12:04:34 AM CDT

good


Dinesh Rating:

said this on 23 Jan 2007 7:40:31 PM CDT

Well friends, privtation is a very contentious issue. Just take the example of Private Hospitals, ther poor cant even think of getting a treatment there and if we do make all hospitals private then I can for sure say the people will die for treatment. And about the Power Industry, if its privatised, we are sure to get proper power supply but with increased rate per unit. The people of India made a huge hue and cry about the increasing petrol price and if the electricty rate are increased then look at the reaction.


dhanasekar Rating:

said this on 01 Sep 2009 9:48:52 AM CDT

nice


mayank Rating:


http://e-sparc.com/articles/19/1/Should-the-public-sector-be-privatized/0000

http://e-sparc.com/articles/19/1/Should-the-public-sector-be-privatized/google.com

well i totally agree with what dinesh said...its not about getting anything privatised...but its about how to deal with with the public sector enterprises. It is always benificial to have private sector units in a country but as we are still a progressing nation where still more than 30% of the population is below poverty line,will it be ethical to think just of profit.I think it will not be fair enough for the people who can not afford to pay for it. public sector units shall not be privatised only what needs to be checked out is management.


madhuri goel Rating:


well said mayank


pooja Rating:


I am not agreed on this piont completely Government sector is known for its red tapism and corruption.Dealing withthe govt. officers will definately bind you to go door to door.but on the other side , private sector is dignified for its efficient managment and for making the best use of resources. for aspiring to be a devloped country , there is neeed for having a effective managment strategy as we have a sufficient means and human resources like any developed nation but need to make best use of it. In every budget , a large sum of money is alloted to government department but because of dormant and unoptimistic attitute of people , there is a very little impact on our economy.so if we can transformed this scenrio by aillance with private sector and if we have to pay a liitle a bit more for this then it does not matter.


Amit Kumar Rating:


Well said pooja ,I agree with you what you have said ,but one thing I want to clear that private sector make all the things easier ,at the cost of what ? the answer is money ,at present scenario 70% people live in villages and they are not capable enough to spend huge money.suppose Train ,Hospitals,schools,colleges all become private then where these 70% people will go.By making all the sector private we just separating the India into two group i.e rich group and poor group .The thing is that India is still developing country.All we will need to do is that we have to stay unified and support Government to

provide us best facilities .who make the Government definitely we ,then we have to faith on it.Once we allow to breed the private sector in full swing then we are completely in clutch of them and our freedom are lost.On the other hand I am not totally disagree that private sector is bad.The thing is that we need to have better administrator who have capability to manage the resource properly.


ranjeetkaur Rating:


m agree with amit....as he said what will happen to 70% of people of our nation if every sector gets privatised,if it happens then how the poor people, who even today think about their 2 times meal,will survive? bcoz after privatisation of every sector,prices of all things will definitely go up.we can think of privatisation but only after our nation becomes developed.Need of hour is what that all of us must aware of our duties and we must do every work dedicatedly so that even if we are working in a public sector,people believe on the services of public sector.


siva sankar Rating:


Well said pooja ,but we can not privatize all the sectors for getting the best outcome because we have to take the decisions which are helping to the people of India .Then only our developing India will become developed one.I feel the better solution is we have to appoint a some Intelligent private committee for checking the working of Govt sector.Based on those results we will take appropriate actions.By coming to Hospt sector we have to give some rankings the Hospitals.Then there is healthy competition in Hospitals like IITs in Indian Educational System.


akanksha bahety Rating:

said this on 12 Oct 2010 7:16:11 PM CDT

well said pooja...m agree wid u..sooner or later one has to move on to private sector for better services which are not provided by public sector


payal Rating:


countrys development depends on individual development.. if everything goes privatised how will the bpl population sustain further as 40%of the population is BPL. so its govt, management to be developed once this goes our country will reach its desired goal.. and private gives you wealth and takes ur health!!! u will have for each rupee u f=get from it ie u need to play the role of a slave in a private sector.... where as for public sector u can have a budget along with healthy relations...


pooja Rating:


I am agreed on this piont completely Government sector is known for its red tapism and corruption.Dealing withthe govt. officers will definately bind you to go door to door.but on the other side , private sector is dignified for its efficient managment and for making the best use of resources. for aspiring to be a devloped country , there is neeed for having a effective managment strategy as we have a sufficient means and human resources like any developed nation but need to make best use of it. In every budget , a large sum of money is alloted to government department but because of dormant and unoptimistic attitute of people , there is a very little impact on our economy.so if we can transformed this scenrio by aillance with private sector and if we have to pay a liitle a bit more for this then it does not matter.


nikhil Rating:


actually the current situation is meangfully describe by pooja.


P K MAHATO Rating:

said this on 05 Jul 2010 7:41:50 PM CDT

i am totaly agree with this statement. but it should be done on sansad.


anita Rating:


ya pooja u r right.but as our country India is a poor country.there are many people under poverty. so they can not afford the services given by the private sectors. so according to my point of view private sectors r not bad but all public sectors like hospitals, schools,transport should not be privatized.


arun Rating:


very good


shama Rating:


i agree with mayank......


pratibha Rating:


i agree with u very nice ..


cHJhdGliaGE=pratibha Rating:

http://e-sparc.com/articles/19/1/Should-the-public-sector-be-privatized/Z21haWw=gmail

http://e-sparc.com/articles/19/1/Should-the-public-sector-be-privatized/gmail


i agree with dinesh if there is priatisation is done then there only loss of those peoples who r not able to pay.i thought that it's not right.


shubh singh Rating:


hi.. Friends. i totally agree with the comment given by the dinesh.. if privatization is done in every sector then this will really going to create big problem as normal or the poor people can't survive in private sector.. n this will lead to change in the govt..and again the election will be conducted which result in the missuses of the fund deposited n the fraud politician can again fill their pocket n enjoy the situation.. so again here the poor people will become the target n they hv to face the problem.. so ,i think in our country its time to keep both the sectors working mutually in order to balance the situation n condition..


payal Rating:


i agreee with u dinesh coz if inflation occurs in case of hospitals the death rate would increase to such an extent such that we will not be able to control but we need to have some private and few govt. sectors but it ll be helpful for the poor..


tehzeeb Rating:


i agree that public sector should be privatised..in private sector all things are handled more efficiently and effectively..more money is earned in case of private setor..hence we can hope to increase our salary i.e. average salary of the country will markedly increase..which we can say to an extent that our country will develop at a faster rate..hospitals if privatised will result in better medical care..even if it is perceived as more costly as compared to govt. sectors..then let me give you an overview of things which are managed in hospitals...a patient if is poor is not dealt with utmost care and attention..is treated like a lowly thing...but had the patient been well off or had ministerial contacts then he will be given full care with all possible facilities..then wat is the use of

public sector handling various institutions????


prity Rating:


no i think that public company should not be privatised because in public company there is mostly provisions for poor people but in private no relationship with poor.and in private sector company all the money are gathered at a place bt in public sector its spread among the public. our india is poor country so first we think about to remove the poverty of our country before anything.


akhil Rating:


excellent


anuj rana Rating:


i m fully agree with u n wants to add tht privatisation also increase employment ,working efficiency....


hari Rating:

said this on 01 Feb 2007 1:30:17 AM CDT

it is good


sirisha Rating:

http://e-sparc.com/articles/19/1/Should-the-public-sector-be-privatized/qqq.google.com


sir ur info is excellent.but i advice u to put the keypoints as first.bcaz if we want to search it takes too much of time.so plz give key with as possible as short. thanks for give us this info bye


S.Anusha Rating:


IT WILL BE USEFUL IF SOME MORE POINTS ARE DISCUSSED UNDER THIS TOPIC


trimplek Rating:


hi...i would like to add to all the above points discussed above whatever sector v talk about is not self sufficient. when we talk about raising of funds in such sectors...not all companies are in a position to raise money through public....hence, banking sector plays the most imp role here when funds r concerned every industry is dependent on it and vice-versa. in todays scenerio definitely i agree that public or nationalised banks are at a deterioriting stage but not all( eg: SBI, BoB, ) almost all banks have now realised the imp of services marketing and r working on it after facing threat from foriegn banks.one can't expect the most imp resource i.e. capital to be in the private or foreign hands.just for the purpose of growth of individual co's the entire economy cannot be handed over to the private sector.there should be a fair blend of private n public undertaking.


Harshit Jain Rating:


Well my dear friend if you are talking about the public sector banks then let me tell they have the poorest management including SBI, as an evidence we can look at the growth rate, you will find that the private sector banks are growing at the higher rate then the public sector banks, and the day is not very far when private bank surpass the public sector banks, if they do not wake up now.......it will be very late. Even before some days you must have found the news that SBI is going to recruit 20,000 employees, but let me tell you it is gonna be a flop idea, cause the people they recruiting are either 12th standard passed or graduate only, the new era requires people having business intelligence, and believe me you will find the same

thing that i am telling you.


shilpa Rating:


yes, my dear friend you are right and i agreed with your views..today we need private sectors so much because there are more efficient people are worked with more efficiency like SBI well now the recuirtement seat is grower and be 25000..and everyone 12th passed individual can feel this form..so this is not so much good for public sectors and we should need private sectors..


VIJAY SINGH Rating:


WELL SIR,YOUR COMMENT ON PRIVATE AS WELL AS ON PUBLIC SECTER IS GOOD ENOUGH BUT IT WILL BE MORE BENEFICIAL IF U ADD SOME DATA MATERIALS.I AM FULLY AGREE WITH UR POINT THAT BEFORE TALKING ABOUT PRIVATIZATION THE VERY FIRST THING WE SHOULD DISCUSS IS THE SECTORS WE ARE GOING TO DEAL WITH.AS OFFCOURSE ALL THE SECTORS CAN'T BE PRIVATIZED AS IT WOULDN'T BE A SAFE DEAL.


Divya Rating:


Any topic given in GD is in such a way that anyone can say its good in either way depending on the context.So what I think is its not good to say that privatization or public sector depends on the context. It shows that you are not confident enough to take a decision


ankit tomar Rating:


i think a man need a direction for getting success,everbody works hard but it will not produce

http://e-sparc.com/articles/19/1/Should-the-public-sector-be-privatized/gmail.com

favourable result until our efforts are well directed towards the target.so this material will help a lot


laal Rating:


dear ankit.. in case study u go with positive and negative both points..so whatever he said is good enough for a GD, as case study is a part of GD


jayagayathri Rating:


better


Anand Rating:


yes i completly agree with mr.ssrkraju that privtization is not necessary in every sector.can you emagine when railway,airlines,oil componies and electricity will be privatised that time the cost of every thing will be incresed unbelivable and every indians will be suffered more.


pallavi srivastav Rating:


hi Privtation.....its sound very attractive.bt in India if you privtatise thn you hv to make all ppl employed with good salary.Bt inIndia its tk time or nt going to b hapn.if all public sector b privatise thn autimatically theafting,murder corpuction e.t.c will increase. n i dont thnk ppl want this.


Mohammed Aleemuddin Rating:


It was gud .everyone communicated verywell on the topic but including of some more pts will be beneficial for aspirants.Thanx bye


ashutosh Rating:


Hii, everyone, as my friend ssrkraju has said can v have private telecom companies n all n all, i would like to inform u Relience is private company recently Mr. Mukesh Ambani has established a petrochemical plant which is the second largest plant in the world.......n nt dat much only he also steped into a vegetable market....u must b aware wid the fact n figures how the price of petrol is increasing under goverment but Relience petrol pumps are providing petrols on much cheaper rate......Mukesh has said when he wz there in Bang. on opening of vegetable mall there he said...vegetable rates r Fluctuating now a days bt it will not make any difference to this mall...here price will be same in all the situations.... now my point is nowa days private companies r providing much more facilities as compared to govermental


niyas Rating:


yes i entirely agree with mr.ssrkraju that privtization is not important in every sector. it is very usefull to freshers when they read it.thankyou


deepak Rating:


good one it was helpful


Jyoti Prakash Das Rating:


Good Topic


sandeep Rating:


good discussion


mridul jain Rating:


i think privatization is very good for our country, coz in private companies employes give their 100%.


krishna Rating:


i strongly agree with mridul jain but every sector should not be privatized. some sectors which should require the devolopment they should be privatized


mayank Rating:


well mridul i would like to make a remark on your comment that in private companies the employees give their 100% for sure...but rather than giving 100%,more than 100% of them is taken out at the cost of handful of salary.Needless to say employees over there are made to be worked for more than 12 hours a day to achive their goal for the day.this is givin terrible consequences..divorces hav increased as couples are not able to spend time with each other under sever work pressure.Many new diseases have came into existence..all these consequences themselves say the story no need to comment that public sector is the favourite.


bhagyashree Rating:


Well mayank i do agree with wat u said........ its true that privatisation may give good outputs n dat would b fast enough but not now....i mean v r still a developing nation...majority of d peple r poor n they do rely on public sectors for their needs....i think tat both of these sectors r equally important....they r both strong enough to improve the current position of India...the only need is that they work properly,take gud decisions on behalf of the company,the peple of India as well as on behalf of the nation inorder to make it another developed nation on the globe............


abhishek rathi Rating:


I agree with mayank on above points but let me tell u that it is the employee who is accepting & willing to work & thats why he is being paid lumpsum amount. also thr is no requirement ki u need 2 work for more than 12 hours. U are required to finish a task in quality manner & u do it asap. U get promotion. n every coin has two sides. If u expect money,fame, u have to devote time & even this happens wid couples. As u spend time u get closer. n performance matters. Privatisation helps to get things faster,smoothly. U talk of banking sector, tel;ecom, insurance,oil & what not,& govt is also thinking of privatising many sectors. for eg SAIL, moil,oilindia etc. So its the need to privatise public sectors. however, defense should not be done so...


swati Rating:


yup! its ok.but not as good as 1st one is. some more posts must be on it.as earier keerthi wrote well, here should b some thing like.. .whatsoever it was ok.


bhushan Rating:


i am fully agree with Mr. tehzeeb, there should be privatization in public sector,if we talk about the current scenario all the private companies count the value of money and time,while in public sector people are lazy(but they have good knowledge),they dont want to utilize the time and money. only privatization can change there mindset if we talk about the poor people,there are lots of hospitals and social organizations which provide help to these people In crux privatization is the best way for countries growth


siluvaivendan s Rating:


usefull


ashwin zade Rating:


Well friends, I think that selected public sectors should be privatized. The major sectors like railways, oil& natural gas, mining etc. should be kept public. This is because these sectors belong equally to all citizen of India,because they use the natural resources of India, over which every citizen has equal right. Private sectors are primarily driven by profit motive. They may not think of public welfare. Second thing is that , if all the public sectors are privatized , then we must see that market forces keep the price affordable.We must also ensure that monopoly doesn't occur. Finally, I think that from economically well settled citizen's point of view,privatization should take place. Because he may get better services. But seeing from poor citizen's point of view, he has public sector services as last ray of hope(e.g. hospitals, education,ration, etc.) Majority of indian population(30-40%) belongs to below poverty line.So, in that way, I think that at present time, not all public sectors should be privatized.


Amit Rating:

said this on 03 Oct 2007 12:18:42 AM CDT

hello everyone all u said that's true but privatisation is necessary but there is some extent in privatisation many mncs are coming to india and they earn profit for there own so it is beneficial but up to some extent


ginni bajaj Rating:


before privatisation of the public sector we should not only consider only few sectors and give decision for the whole . as told telecom in private hands is perfectly all right as we all k now that reliance was the first one to lanch mobiles for rs 500 and call rates 40p all over india , so it depends on sectors


aleesha Rating:


well i think privitazation is definetly gonna help us in boomin up with the salary system n will improve the standars of living . but we should not forget dat publc sectors are unavoidable .. as one of the person has stated a very valid point about ration card systems. private sectors have a competing tendency n dey move along wid the flow whr as the publis sector is more concerned bopt the nation in whole n has to luk after the very need of all the category of ppl..


MITTU-ICFAI Rating:


it is good why because we know importance of privatisation through last 5 years development privatization will give effective production then we can get more revenue then automatically the share share of the organization will grow you take simple example government hospital and private hospitals in india the peoples are observe a lot of difference so friend i would like to conclude that privatization of governemtn organization is important


Ashish/Abhijit Rating:


well the topic is good for discussion but the discussion depends on the different sectors.


Asim Rating:


Just remember that three people will not change the fate of India. Also if India looses its public sector to the private players how will the country get money and income from which is used by the low class people in the country. Then the only thing that is left with India is to increase the tax rates or watch the country in the hands of private players and enjoy the profits which should be in the hands of 'JANTA'.


srikanth Rating:


many of them saying conversion public sector to private sector some extent it is good but it is not possiable because if each and every compay, organization is privatisied it make trobules to poor people. There are some strategic sectors, which need to be under control of Indian government like oil/gas sector. if this sector is privatisied we will never get the subsidy and this enjoyment never provided by a private sector. The government in this case helps its citizens to a great extent and making them available to its citizens.as like telecom companies in india facing computation because of that we r getting cheply high level products this one is good. take example of hospitals if it is privitized poor people definitely face trobule


ruby and sandhya Rating:


all the public sector companies should not be privatised becoz if all the private companies are set up with a profit motive and 30-40% of people are below poverty line..so the public companies keeps the ethics in mind...take eg of railways,electricity,hospitals for poor if they are privatised..


jayesh Rating:


Hello, Hasnt public private partenerships increased over the period of time? Rajiv Gandhi, the visionary behind opening up economy gave a green signal to private players. Hitherto, in infrastrucutre alone India has witnessed 86 PPP deals and over $51bn has been poured into the sector. WHat we need is development, and it has to come FAST. Pvt ltd should be approached for exploiting their core competencies and experiences. We dont want 100% privatisition since it would have no regulatory / governing body, which could at times go against public favor as it is happening in case of organised retail where even pvt player are bound to affect a set of community. Imagine the situation where for eg a company like reliance would be free to sel gas all over india without any governance/partnership ? or Sify/hathway dominating broadband space without existence of VSNL which ensure that public intrests are safeguarded? SO hving pvt players all over would never make a sense especialy in sensitive sectors like defence, DRDO etc..They should be set up where synergies r bounnd to be achieved


ravi Rating:


i agree at this point. public sectors should be privitised. in the public sectors 90 persent of the people are sitting idle. in some public sectror companies employees are playing cards. this generation is rapidly moving to the sky. so we think that work hard and get sucess in the work. then only over nation flag is will high and high. so we should work hard. in public sectors there is work but they cant do work since there is no boss and no dead lines if there is a dead lines also they are taking a simple. learning and implimentation is not possible in the public sectors. so in the past days most of the doctors and engineers indians are settle in us and other countries, since here there is no grouth. if it is a privitisation there is a some ristriction. so compulsory work hard. and think, learn some thing, implementing something and achive a new things, so that in the w


Faiyaz Rating:


Its true totally public sector is not converted into private sector Bcoz different sector has diffrent pons and cons which different level or category of the people. we don't forget that India is rich but Indian are poor. these poor Indian has go for only in the public sector bcoz there are coming in poverty line. so i can say only that once u get the privatized the sector its increase the economy growth but poverty line people will suffer wch is huge in number....


shyam awasthi Rating:


it's ok only private sector is providing good services,even public sectors org is providing good services we cann't forget S.B.I bank,ONGC,BSNL ETC.these companies providing beeter facility .


simran Rating:


hi to all, acc to me privatization of public sector will be very benificial nt only to org but also to the people. coz as v all know very well the diff bet the service provided by gov hospital and a private hospital .. there is lot of issues in gov sectors which cant be solved there is no one who is deeply interested in development of gov sector so if they r organised in a better way they will be a boon to the socity otherwise it is better to privatize them


yogita Rating:


IT IS VERY WELL SAID THAT DECISIONS LIKE THIS ARE TO BE TAKEN WITH PROPER CONSIDERATION OF THE IMPACT WHICH IT WILL HAVE ON POLITICAL, ECONOMICAL, SOCIAL,TECHNOLOGICAL AND LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE COUNTRY. A INDIAN ECONOMY IS NOT WORKING IN A VACUUM, IT NEEDS THE SUPPORT OF PRIVATE PLAYERS AND THE GOVERNMENT. WE CAN'T UNDERESTIMATE THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT OR PUBLIC SECTORS AS THEY ARE THE NATION BUILDING FORCES. HOWEVER, WE CAN'T OVERESTIMATE THE ROLE OF PRIVATE SECTORS, AS THEY ARE WORKING JUST FOR PROFITS. NO DOUBT PRIVATE PLAYERS ARE MORE ENERGETIC AND ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT THEIR SUCESS BUT IT WON'T BE TOO MUCH TO SAY THAT THEY CAN OVERLOOK THE NATION'S CONCERN OVER THERE OWN. SO AT THIS MOMENT WE AS A CITIZEN OF INDIA, HAVE TO SHOW OUR ZEAL TO MAKE OUR COUNTRY A DEVELOPED NATION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BY EXPLOATING ALL THE OPPORTUNITIES WEATHER IT IS BY PRIVATISING SOME OF OUR KEY SECTORS.


NIR4ANJAN KUMAR SINGH Rating:


All the private sector should be privatised


priya Rating:


this topic is very nice and all d ppl gave very good conclusions...


sahana Rating:

said this on 05 Nov 2007 12:10:22 PM CDT

well i think we need to look into the competencies of both public n private sectors.. public sectors are designed to serve all the citizens may it poor middle class or upper class... private sectors wherein promise a higher standard service... i think we need to motivate the public sector to improvise the way they are functioning...so that it will help in overall development of the nation. instead of commenting and creating the perception that public sectors(SARKARI) are not a serious affair .. we need to create awareness and encourage the public run institutions to perform better. so its not necessary that we have to privatise all the public institutions(sectors)


priya Rating:


thanx for provinding this kind of stuff. i m sure this is going to help me a lot and i can also get massive knowladge out of it. thanx once again


GaganpreetKharbanda Rating:


Yes I appreciate most of the comments,I agree on this that Depending upon the sectors private and public identity can be given,One thing for the sure when we talk of privatization its the best in Todays scenario thereby leading to growth of world economy, meeting the standard of life of people of India,why we people are poor due to un employment, which private companies are providing nowin comparison to public enterprises,To quote an example, Be it Reliance, Bharti , or aditya Birla Group,with the onset of retail merchandising, things will be improved further, thereby

decreasing the costs leading to price wars waiving the involvement of middleman(real earners) and providing everything under one roof,so anyways coming up of Reliance retails, Pharma, Walmart is beneficial for the development of or country keeping in prespective the development of mankind Thanks to share with you all


kshitish Rating:


well i think we need to look into the competencies of both public n private sectors.. public sectors are designed to serve all the citizens may it poor middle class or upper class... private sectors wherein promise a higher standard service... i think we need to motivate the public sector to improvise the way they are functioning...so that it will help in overall development of the nation. instead of commenting and creating the perception that public sectors(SARKARI) are not a serious affair .. we need to create awareness and encourage the public run institutions to perform better


sarmisti Rating:

said this on 04 Dec 2007 5:07:01 AM CDT

yes my friends has told very valid points then wat is the need of LPG If itis privitized there will be Value for every thing (money ,time,eforts ) One more thing i would like share with u friends "SOMEBODY CANT DO EVERYTHING BUT EVERYBODY CAN DO SOMETHING" So we will together(govt &private) can enjoy taste of the success. thanq for giving me this oppurtunity to share my feelings with thanq bye


abdul Rating:


Acc,raju there r few sectors which should not be privitised but even govt is taking necessary steps to give its best service.the attitude/feeling of people on public sectors should change for example hospitals private hospitals cannot reach to rural villages,and govt is inviting private sectors to serve people for better service.Any how we have a right to use public sectors (ex:rtc)under certain offers (ex:student pass)which cannot be given by the private sector at all.So it is a responsibility of a citizen to use public sectors and take part in the development of the organisation


abdul Rating:


Acc,raju there r few sectors which should not be privitised but even govt is taking necessary steps to give its best service.the attitude/feeling of people on public sectors should change for example hospitals private hospitals cannot reach to rural villages,and govt is inviting private sectors to serve people for better service.Any how we have a right to use public sectors (ex:rtc)under certain offers (ex:student pass)which cannot be given by the private sector at all.So it is a responsibility of a citizen to use public sectors and take part in the development of the organisation


A.N.Hemamalini Rating:


Hi everyone,i say that eventhough there is both gov. and priv. sectors both r running for us with some benefits and with some difficults but anyway gov. buses r providing free pass for students,but which the priv. sectors not do so...........


Nachiketa Gupta Rating:


both private and publice sector is two side of coin. country can not think development to left any one sector. both are neccessary u cant say all public sector should be privatised if it is happen than govt. lost his power.first we have to know for which sector we have talking about like we can not give defence and railways to private sector because they are more in profit making rather than serving to peoples but sick unit of public sector which goes in losses we privatise them.


vinit Rating:


I think, all of the articles have been good from discussion point of view. What I feel is, making a public sector privatized has different different things to be considered. It has some good as well as

bad depending on the type of industry you are going to make private. If you look at oil services and LPG gas services, if they will be privatized it will be too costly for a middleman to bear the burden of these without subsidies provided by the govt. Presence of a govt company into the market also controls the prices and regulates the market. Basic facilities like water and electricity are the ones which are good only when in hand of government because govt is not going to think about profit only. It will also think about the future of that and will provide subsidies if needed. But the other services like telecom services, automobile services and IT services are good in hand of private sector firm because they will compete in this field and even they will have to keep their prices low at the same time as they are not the basic needs of a person because if prices are too high, a middle man can cut down the consumption of these services. The only way to come ahead will be quality and low cost so public sector except the sector for basic requirements of the country should be privatized which will result in far better situation of country. Let me take an example if all the hospitals are being privatized, will every person of India be able to get the health care services? Will he be able to survive in this situation? So there is no point in sectors related to basic services being privatized.


priyanka Rating:


the points placed by everyone is correct acc to them. i to agree with most of my frens that not all but some public sectors which needs help from private sectors,whici are not efficient enough to serve the public should be given in the hands of private comp so that the services provided to public are improved.....


shantanu purwar Rating:


i favour and also disfavour this comment,when we are talking of services in less cost or subsidies then public sector should be followed.But in case of development like in field of IT,Industries,exports and imports private sector to be followed.We require both types of services keeping in mind that both not only help people but our country development also....


meenakshi Rating:


i disfavour the comment. if all the private sector is privatized , the average salary of the people should be increased. our country will developed soon. i accept it, but only 30% of the peoples in india is enjoying the previlage, the remaining 70% are under the poverty line due to the rise in the cost of living.


Priya Verma Rating:


Yes ,i agree that public sector should be privatised. But some areas of bsiness shouldn't be becoz about 40% of population in India is below poverty line and they could not afford costly things


shatabdi roy Rating:


it ws realy good. i got n excellent idea on the topic because i didnt hd ne idea. i came to knw abt many things abt both private n public sectors. thank u.


ashish verma Rating:


its very fine discussion.


priya baj Rating:


nice discussions ,facts are less is the only weakness..


rahul t Rating:


acc to me some of the sectors should be kept public ,,bcoz there are some sectors which directly influence poor peoples or those which r below poverty line ,,if these sectors are privatise they effect them ,,bcoz in private sectors they there main objective is to make profit for them then think of others ,,so acc to me some sectors shuld be reserved as semi private


santosh Rating:


public sectiors organisation have a mission not only run profitably but also to work for the development of people and social cause. if the public sector like hospital and school college will be privatised then it will be difficult for most of the common people and specially poor people to afford the cost of treatment in the hospital and afford the fees of the education.


SUDHA PURNIMA Rating:


IT IS VERY NICE THANKS FOR GIVING THIS INFORMATION


adarsh kumar soni Rating:


its been excellent this site is really excedingly helpful.


SREE Rating:


it's a nice topic and is excellent in the above discussions


anu Rating:


it was avery fine article and i got tremendous information..like some of my frenz here,even i think dat all sectors should not be privatised.apart from profits,welfare of people should also be kept in concern.dere r many better services provided by public sector also like sbi,vijaya etc.public and private sector go hand in hand...growth of country can be done by joint effort only.....


vikram kundu Rating:


privetization is benifisial for those organisations those not performing well. whr people do not understand there responsiblities...


sindhura Rating:


ya this is very nice


Apeksha.Anand.Belsare Rating:


hey these points are really very helpful....it gave me 2 think in various prospects....thanks


jyothi Rating:


super

http://e-sparc.com/articles/19/1/Should-the-public-sector-be-privatized/google


gaurav Rating:


I think that those departments from where the govt is earning money i.e. electricity board, incomtax dept., water supply department, should privateized. b'coz in these depatments employes take bribes and the ppl' bear. they mak the false charges against the general ppl' and tak money from them. so that these departments are the root cause of corouption.


joy Rating:


i dont think so if people r payed better then why will they take bribe just bcoz of some people we cannot blame the whole institution i think the govt is doing a fairly good job


neha kumari Rating:


India is a devloping country and most of the people here are very poor if all the public sectors are privetized then where these poor people vl go.complete privetization is possible only in devloped coutries where people are rich enough to afford.its true that their is a all of corouption in the public sector and people do sit idle as my frd gaurav said bt ths is not the only solution for the problem.time has come we should understand our responsibility towards our work.the minset of people must be changed.


ayon Rating:


Mr.ssrkraju...u said it well...there are some pints like privetization is definitely help full but not to the extent of all public sector. as u already mentioned...about few sectors...another important sector is railway...if railway is privatized completely it will definitely hit india badly though few thing in rail ways are already in private hand but...the main control is still under govt: and all over the

world no where it is successful by the private player such a great extent...


PARTHIBAN Rating:


hi friends,we should encourage the public sectors cos they r the backbone of india,if we take the private sectors, they r working for improvement of that particular company only,they wont bother about the development of the nation.take birla group of companies they r concentrating only to develop their branches allover the world.private players r concerned with the profit only.but the public sectors supports the people who r all below the poverty line,thank u friends..


aneef Rating:


i accept private sectors.. bcoz ask rajesh.(M.G.R)..he s working mnc..


Thahir Rating:


hi friendz.. To my view Government (public sector) are better when compared to Private Sectors. Both are Mutually Exclusive.


g.ashwini nachammal Rating:


hi!!! i accept that there must be a balance between both the sectors.it would be better if,in india,there is an understanding between the sectors for the development of our nation i.e. public sectors could implement new ideas and innovate new methods for the people`s welfare and comfort whereas private sectors can improve the nation`s economy.


deepak hinduja Rating:


i think govt.should also privatised rail way not fully but some part of it like 30% as it will be helpful to govt. by getting monetary help from private side.the govt. will have the major power so the poor people will not be exploited.


rashmi Rating:


i think all above statements r right,according to my point of view public sector should not be privatised because if pub. sector will be privatised poor people can not bye those services which is provided by public sectos because of subsidy.pub sec provided services to that poor people who r using ration card.


shreyash Rating:


i think both sector are well.as private sector u do not have power against public sector.our country 70% people are living in rural area he did not effort as private hospital,colleges etc. public sector have good salary, good living standard ,getting a good colleges study so many thing.


radhika Rating:


it was simply gud nd it helped me a lot for my gd session


sachin Rating:

http://e-sparc.com/articles/19/1/Should-the-public-sector-be-privatized/gmail

http://e-sparc.com/articles/19/1/Should-the-public-sector-be-privatized/gmail.com


vry gud


Ramesh HN Rating:


hey everybody, I'll start by appreciating some of you who have written excellent comments. Should the public sector be privatized? we can't say generalize and say yes or no as it is pretty subjective. when we say the public sectors should be privatized I'm sure we're just considering the quality of the services or products of a private sector, otherwise we don't have any reason for privatizing the public sector. So as far as I'm concerned we should prepare a list of the qualities which has made the private sector very effective and efficient, for example.. 1.private sectors are result orientated 2.employees are highly professional 3.Management will be really worried about the profit of the company which is directly related to their survival and profit and other compensation 4. Accountability and responsibilities... etc.. are few of them what obvious is, when we privatize all the public sectors chances off prices of going high is very likely.So, why cant we just say public sectors should be more efficient and result oriented so that we can ensure that we'll get all the benefits ( good quality services with cheaper price) which will help underprivileged and middle class people, because after all India has very less percentage of upper strata or elite class people.... can we say public sectors should be efficient and effective, and start thing and debating how to do that????!!!


neha Rating:


fantastic.. i totally agree with ramesh


Swapna Rating:


I totaly agree wat Ramesh said, By Seeing all the Comments, I also wanted to share........., Public Sector should not be privitized, if it get privitized, the rates will go high where the middle class people and low class people cant effort such thing,, so........ instead of this, public sector should improve their quality of service efficiently and effectively..... then everyone prefers public secotrs where they can get good quality with the lower price, by this way we can improve the profit of

http://e-sparc.com/articles/19/1/Should-the-public-sector-be-privatized/Rediffmail

public sectors and people prefer to go public sector, this helps to the middle class people and low level people... If anything wrong written........Please excuse me....


laxmi Rating:


hi friends, Ya though there are many dis-advantages or problems (related to delay of services,etc.) in the public sector, still people are benefitted in one way or the other through the various means of public norms which may not be in private undertaking. So. i feel that public sector need not be privatised as it may not benefit the people or if it is privatised the objective of privatisation may not the reach the people correctly.


Dhruvi Rating:


Thanks, alot friends for helping me in clarifying the concept in a way to change my personal point of view about should public sector be privatised or it should'nt,


nehal Rating:


it is indeed a good topic to discuss. i think that there should be mixed invovlement of both private & goverment in all sector ,, except few which are of prime importance like defence, finance, foreign affairs etc. my idea is to incorporate private agencies in all public sectors giving them all responsibilites. but they should be placed or headed by goverment authorities who shall regulate them.


Mohit Saxena Rating:


Excellent Performance and views

http://e-sparc.com/articles/19/1/Should-the-public-sector-be-privatized/www.msn.com


Thilaga Rating:


This article is very useful for my GD preparation.Thanks a lot..


aseem Rating:


hello, In my point of view some public sectors should be privatized.coz if all the sectors are privatized then there is hike in prices which in turn are out of range of the middle people and poor people. if all the sectors got private then this will lead to increase in poor population. and due to which our economy will go down and increase in poor people . so in my view all sectors are not privatized only some of the sectors like transportation, and banking gets privataized. thanx.


Dharmendar Rating:


Hi, If all department are convereted in to privataized, then the poor people has to suffer. For example, we can take Hospital, Normally for taking scan in Private hospital, they will charges five times more than the public hospital. And also if there is no public sector, The private people take this as a advantage and have there own rules. There will be no one to control.


Ankush Nowal Rating:


i would like to comment on what Ashutosh said ......... that mukesh ambani is giving away petrol or vegetables at a lower cost.........but le me tell you the reason buddy , he is doing it cuz he is in competition with the public sector and just think if public sector wasn't der, he too wouldn't have missed the oppurtunity of rising prices and making more money outta it....personally what i feel is that something missing in public sector is the fear of loss of job........so all needed in a public sector

is just that who is not working should be kicked out ............


alok vajpayee Rating:


fuck off ..........its bullshit group discussion.


Ashish Barn Rating:


saale yaha gd karne aaye hai bhai...........mooh chodi karne nahi samajhe BHO......


muthusamy Rating:


iam not agree with that public sector be privatised. public sector is worked more for poor people than for rich . the cost of service is very much nearer to poor. . what th egovt have to do to minimize the corruption & increase the more service.


mansingh Rating:


I disagree with the view that public should be made private , yaah its true that public organization are little bit slow as the people working in it are working slow . But we cant be unfair to poor people , either as a customer or as a employee . Not every people are intelligent and not every people are rich . India is a secular country with every kind of people living here , we have to take all kind of people together . We cant throw slow people out of the country , or snatch his job coz he is slow . Well private organization does that mostly , once you show -ve performance . they will kick u out but not lke public organization . Public sector take needy step to hold their people . Not all public sector are slow , our defence comes under gov organization , think if it goes private .


Viplove Goel Rating:


I wish to bring customer and employee perpective view to this topic. Privatization leads to better and efficient working as they are return oriented in their task, but they bring in such stringent clauses to the system that customers face the brunt of their interests. They are so much adamant for their returns that they even lay down the average employees just to show profits in thier books. This leads to chaos, which has multiple effects on whole economy. The benefit that we see can reap is the standardization that they bring in and the innovative and benchmark practices to the business. We have seen that with advent of private players in the banking system we have a more flexible and efficient banking system. Privatization of electricity supply has led to increased revenues, less theft of electricty. In the end i would like to say that we have to give the stick to the government, as it will only be saviour if these private players manipulate the system.


Sudin Rating:


As far as a nation is considered its progress depends on how well its resources are utilized. And whether this results reaches its citizen in terms of employment and better way of life. For efficiency to come one has to make right decisions at right time. And one of the limitation with the govt bodies is the bureaucratic system which drags the decision and action, if they change their attitude to work then only results could be achieved. As per the current situation pvt players are far ahead of the govt undertakings. Every sector will be privatized in future, if not completely but definitely a certain part would be. So privatization should be brought in with control and transparency so that results of efficiency can take the country forward


Ashish Pareek Rating:


Privatization of public sector. Lot depends of which sector we are talking about. Let me clarify few doubts in the primary stage. Can we expect all private hospitals in our cities in our town which do not have an entry for poor people, can we have only private sector telephone companies, can we have private companies have complete control on oil reserves, can we have all transport be provided by private sector and RTC vanishes, can we expect an private sector to take care of our

defense. So as far as I'm concerned we should prepare a list of the qualities which has made the private sector very effective and efficient, for example.. 1.private sectors are result orientated 2.employees are highly professional 3.Management will be really worried about the profit of the company which is directly related to their survival and profit and other compensation 4. Accountability and responsibilities... etc.. are few of them what obvious is, when we privatize all the public sectors chances off prices of going high is very likely.So, why cant we just say public sectors should be more efficient and result oriented so that we can ensure that we'll get all the benefits ( good quality services with cheaper price) which will help underprivileged and middle class people, because after all India has very less percentage of upper strata or elite class people.... can we say public sectors should be efficient and effective, and start thing and debating how to do that????!!!


Anishabasu Rating:


Anisha Basu.....Kolkata Every one is talking abt the highest salary but nobody is talking abt the higher securities of gov. jobs....We sholud take few sectors for privatization...we cannot privatize the gov hospitals.bcz they charge a minimal cost to all the citizens. Underpriviledged peple or those who are from below Poverty Line they cannot afford much to the private nursinghomes.... In case of telecom industries also privatization shuold not be done..It is true that Reliance has introduced the mobile facility first but the indian gov. also providing us better facility in respect of landline as well as mobile at a cheap rate...further more Broadband facility is the most well liked facilty...


urvashi chauhan Rating:


privatization will definitely lead to higher growth, economic development and better facilities but these could even be achieved by government on proper realization of their duties as they owe to the nation and to the people and both public and private sectors are mutually active forces in the economy which leads to healthy competition and better growth perspective.sectoral differentiation is a must for deciding over privatization as a country like India has a mix of economically differentiated class of people and the poor accounts for almost 40% of our population which has to be provided which the basic necessities, ration, housing(public sector), medical care and also the rest of the population are all not in a condition to afford to the rates of privatization so better facilities could also be provided by the government if we design a better management at all levels and hire well educated people, train the existing working staff and reduce the existing red tapism across the public sectors.The existence of both the sectors in the economy will efficiently lead to development and growth.



avik mukherjee Rating:


good


babu Rating:


i m not agree to many thought because in public sector exams is very hard compare to private sector exams , so in public sector employee are able to do anything but our system is wrong . we need only to correcting . we are seeing many public sector companies they r top in ranking like ongc . bhel etc . i think no need to privatization to public sector . otherwise in future we cannot stopped the prises and cannot get subsidy.


ANSHUL SHUKLA Rating:


hi Privtation.....its sound very attractive.bt in India if you privtatise thn you hv to mke all p/e employed with good salary.Bt in India its tk time or nt going to b hapn.if all public sector b privatise thn autimatically theafting,murder corpuction e.t.c will increase. n i dont thnk p/e want this.........&obviously it depnd on sectr 2 sectr........we cnt privatise army,all hospitals,,,etc.............


mayankpriey Rating:


alot of people would say that privatisation will totally eradicate all the problems but his is not true inspite it may create alot of problems for a nation like india which is in the developing stage imagine if govt hospita;s are privatised,where will poors go,think of he privatisation oy BSNL private sector will enjoy the monopolyt and in the end consumers are the sufferer.so inspite of privatising all public bodies the necessary improvement should be done in the functioning of public sector.


http://e-sparc.com/articles/19/1/Should-the-public-sector-be-privatized/google.com


nitin gupta Rating:


yes ,to some extent public sector be privtise........... articles such as food ,petroleum and necessory goods of human need should not be privatise but article such as distribution of electricity in citied should come in privatization fpr better use of it....


Neelu Kumari Rating:


Hi I want to say that private sectors are working well but in public sector they have to do or act like a private sector this is not the fact that public sectors should be privatized.public sectors shoud have change their way of work as i told like private sectors.their are lots of articles like just someone said that education facility , medical facility etc are some need of "aam aadmi"so these things have control of public sector.Because private sector have charged high to people which can not be affordable by poor people


dev Rating:


Hi I think it is impossible for privatization of public sector because mainly poor people are depend on public sector if u calculate then u can analysis in India there more over 60%-70% peoples belong to low salary structure. Put this thing in this way public sector is a part of every indian .


sonali Rating:


as of today's scenario, v c tht the fiscal deficit is 6.4%.so to reduce the deficit the govt is plannin to disinvest so as to raise an amt of rs.40000 cr.thus, in today's scenario privatisation has bcm essential for the growth of indian economy.


Manish Jain Rating:


i read some speech all are relevent to topic and interesting suggstion, and really this type of article will surely remove the unawareness about the topic. thanks to the writer of these topic.


sujithakumar Rating:


Nowadays public or any government institutions are not going well and they treat the people very badly. The only thing is we can't question them if they converted into private definetly they will sincere to their work and the public will also question them.


sourav Rating:


private n public sector both has their own significance. the prime motive of the private sector is PROFIT and so all the responsibilities cannot be given in their hands. but still we cannot deny the fact that they provide better service. whereas the public sector besides making profit is accountable to the people.


neha srivastava Rating:


yes according to my opinion privetization is imp but in few sector because private sector provide a better srvice,whereas the public sector take so much time but every one can not able to get a private srvice.


http://e-sparc.com/articles/19/1/Should-the-public-sector-be-privatized/www.manish.com

Chinmay Rating:


Yes of course privatization of public sector leads to some healthy changes in an organization. But some public sector should not be privatized because the poor people can not entry.


kamath Rating:


I think every sector should be privatized when dealing with India... According to my idea, India with such a huge population should be completely privatized because the cost of any thing will be affordable when there is huge costumers for it... Think of the cost for making a phone calls when there were privatized in the first and had very little costumers they were sky rocketing... but think of the better service provided now with a price for even a fisherman can afford daily... So i think privatizing the sector with large costumers is a must... or this country will face a lot of struggle to become a developed nation... By the way i don't mean the govt should completely ignore and go out... it should be just there monitoring all sectors mainly the dangerous sectors like the nuke power stations and the defense sectors, the private companies develop them rapidly and the government take care of its corrects functionality....


anbarasi Rating:


i agree with ur command


sonal Rating:


thre r lot of views bt my frnd if we talk abt public sector....so thre r a lot of corruption bt in a private sector we prevent the corruption...at a certain limit bcz thre r more transparency b/w the dept and higher security......so if we folloe semi goverment policies in which organization governed by the government bt manage by the privatly... thank u..........


http://e-sparc.com/articles/19/1/Should-the-public-sector-be-privatized/yahoo.co.in

kumarmanohar Rating:


i am with Sonal comment that public sectors with semi governed are like people who has work for money and people also get all the schemes wat government planned to do.So privitisation is a better option to handle the situation besides if we introduce the technology to handle the records which makes faster and can the governenmt reach the people very fast and people can access their needs from the government who are eligible for the schemes .so technology and privitisation gives an enormous growth to india and we can be global leaders as INDIANS ARE HARD WORKERS


YALINI Rating:


In the past decade, we can see only the private players in any field would be doing a good job. but this scenario is changing nowadays. According to fortune india 500 listing, which was published recently, many public sector companies like IOC, ONGC, BPCL, Hindustan Petroleum made stiff competition with private sectors like TCS , Infosys, Reliance etc. On the other side, The one main advantage of private sector companies is that the kind of administration that is taking place in private sector- companies becoming more and more flatter and less bueracratic but it need to be adopted by the Public sectore companies. But you cannot privatise all the public sectors bcos public sectors "do good for all", this notion cannot be followed by private sector.So a better option would be the strategies followed by the private sectors can be adopted by the public sectors and the sectors which are not performing well based on its assets, profitability and liabilities can be privatised.(dogs in BCG Matrix)


Anuj Rating:


i don't go with the privatization of public sectors.as we know that india is a country where people are still not getting the electricity in villages.most of the people in india are not having that much of money so that they can take the service of private hospitals or other pvt organizations.i think if govt will try to remove the corruption which is increasing in public sector day by day then the things will be under control.people working in public sectors have no fear of lossing of job so why there corruption is increasing day by day.private sectors are providing fast services just coz there employees have the fear of job loss if they will show any type of carelessness.


Neeta Rating:


Many public sector companies are performing excellently so privatization of those companies is not justifiable.And if they do privatization of this company it wont be fair with employees as well as country.Bimaru companies can be privatized following right process.


sakshi jain Rating:


I totally agree with ssrkraju, both sector having its differ importance and it can not convert the whole public sector in to private sector. some public sectors doing best and give effective response so if there is a problem in some public sectors than also we can privative it but on the other hand most of the rural people only depend upon the public sector. so in economy there is a mixture of both.


harshil shah Rating:


i agree with that... public sector should be privatize for crumbling monopolies in the market. People get the value of their penny and that is a must thing to improve India's GDP. Public sector are always providing a fast services and in this fast life we really need to have a fast services. because no one has time in this era of life...


kumail murtaza Rating:


i agreed with all my frendz....bt my perception towards public sector is reservation....wich is a major reasn for this condition...a student who got 65-75% marks = reservation student getting 45-60%..wich person is intelligent...if this issue resolved i shud say public sector 'll grow

http://e-sparc.com/articles/19/1/Should-the-public-sector-be-privatized/www.gmail.com

http://www.interviewfreak.com/

definitely....well, private is doing there job..and can do much better...


Prakash Kumar


Should the public sector be privatized?...This is a very big ? in our nation. In today's world privatization of public sector is very important. We can say that it is very much needed. Because due to privatization, the level of competition increases and as a result the quality of the product increases and at the same time price of the product decreases. But it is not applicable for all the products and services. We can take an example of telecom services. Because some of the private companies entered into this sector we are enjoying better quality of services in lower prices and their are lot of different services are present in which we are getting the same. But if we talk about some of the public sector services like defense, trains etc...we can find that it is better to be in the public sector as it cant be properly handled by private sectors because of these services hugeness. But we have to look after the working ideas of the public sector keenly and the quality of the services they are providing.


sAROJ SHARMA Rating:


should the public sector be privatized ???????? here first question i want raise is why we are thinking of doing so. is that we think that private banks are better performer than public bank. then we must put light on the fact that biggest and most profitable bank of india is sbi. (with earning per share of rs.114 ) and also have a very effecient core banking system. if compare products of two company. lets take sbi and icici. icici have minimum level of saving account rs.5000 for semi urban and 10,000 for metro semi urban and even for rural it is 2000. "" 2000 "" minimum balance to open an account in rural area. do we really think it is good for rural people and they have interest rate on saving accnt of 4% in compared of this uco bank is giving 6% interest. and also they have less minimum balance in saving accounts. comparing both we can see public banks are good enough. just what we need to do is improve core banking and better customer service as sbi had done. but there is no need to privatised it.


saneet Rating:


superb


saneet Rating:


According to me privatization in public sector should not be done because I admit it privatization will done then the results will be far better as they are now. But I want to ask that what ever the facilities government is giving now will they will be given later also. The answer is no. Because government is lazy but it thinks for the people and specially for poor ones but a privatized company will never think this. Because its goal is to earn profit and it can't think for common people, and this privatization practice will make a rich person more rich and poor will come on road. Thank you!


reverse directory Rating:


Nice post. I figure out something very complicated on diverse internet sites everyday. It will always be stimulating to see content using their corporation writers and employ a small out of their store. Id prefer to use some together with the content in this minor blog regardless of whether you do not mind. Natually Ill present link with your internet weblog. Appreciate your sharing.


What ails Indian sports?


What ails Indian sports?Replies:

Posted By: HELP

TIPS:



http://reversephonelookupcellnumbers.blogspot.com/

A nation of 950 million, we fail to produce great champions barring the occasional Vishwanathan Anand or Geet Sethi. Sports system steeped in bureaucracy. Overriding popularity of cricket leading to neglect in other sports. Traditionally, sports not accorded much importance by us as a career. Need to develop sports from the primary school level-"catch me young"? Various incentives to be given to budding sportsmen like academic credits, sports in lieu of a few other subjects etc. Development of sports infrastructure, making it amenable and affordable...etc.....

Posted By: mohanraai

Dear Friends,

Good topic. I want to highlight some reasons to lack in Sports in our nation.

In our nation have many sports persons. But due to family situation, the person mind was converted (brain washed by parents) to earn money and spend with his/her family like wise. Of course in sports also got money in many ways. But some people only go to successful sports person (spiritual confident persons). And some coaches gave mental torture to their students both men/women’s. This is also one of the reasons. Also now a days parents also advise to children’s " he become a doctor/engineers". So they don't allow to spending time with sports. They guide only to them. If some persons allowed means, they also good up to their college days, after that they focused to jobs.

So the main reasons, doesn't have correct guidance to them.


As what mohanrai said

The main reason for this is right from the child hood the child is brought up in a mind setup that only thro studies we can earn money and if a person is not studying well he is not fit for anything.

Parents are the main reason for this.b’s many parents doesn’t encourage their kids in sports as they do in other fields. They think that if a child has interest in sports he will have to suffer if he grows up.

Proper encourage mend from the childhood is lacking and slowly they lose their interest in sports.

Even if a grown up boy is playing very well he is not selected for playing in the national team b's playing for national team needs some recommendations

these days and main thing is talent is not given importance rather fame and money are given.




Posted By: keerthi

Yes what meena says is correct today the mindset of every parent is like that, and the society became like that. And most important point is most of the schools give importance only to the studies than to the co-curricular activities. The schools have to give special guidance to the students who are interested in sports, and give the man opportunity to participate in tournaments.

Posted By: lakshmishank200

I object some views of meenaski. The parents feel that the son who is into sports won’t earn much when compared to the person who owns a degree. What is the reason of this????? This thought is true but the reason behind is the lack of support from the govt. If a person becomes a national player he should be helped financially for certain aspects for e.g. his son's educational. Lack of support leads to a disinterest in sports. The entertainment channel should also take responsibilities to telecast the sports rather than just telecasting cinemas. For younger children the TV channels should show telecast shows in the form that will impress them. Only by this the sports can be bought an important activity


Hi

If parents are ready to spend enormous amount of money for his studies why cant they the same for him in sports instead. Why shud they seek government's help to support him. Of course in later part of his life he may seek govt support but initially parents are the main source of encouragement and govt can't play a major role initially.



Posted By: satwath

Now a day’s people r crazy abt cricket. They show much interest on this.

Hockey is our National game. But day-by-day peoples interest on it is getting reduced. When we look at cricket most of the people like to participate in it. Where as Hockey we rarely see few schools nd Colleges showing interest on it. So as a national game we must not neglect it. And am not only saying Hockey but other sports too. The type of interest, which is shown towards cricket, must also be shown towards other Sports too.

Posted By: siri

Hiiiiiiii

Yes what my friends says is correct. I want to give some reasons.

First govt is not giving much importance to sports. Yes we look at the people who are interested in cricket bcoz cricket is not under govt .we have cooperate board BCCI.and we have more sponsors for that. But for other sports there are less sponsors so plays face lot of problems so they r not showing interest. So govt has to give much importance sports. And in the selection process also we need recommendations so actual talented people are not getting chance. In population we r in second place but in Olympics we r not getting medals. Why bcoz the talented people r not getting chance. So my request is govt must encourage the players. And it should give the chance to the talented persons rather than recommended persons. And the same sponsors not only showing interest towards cricket at the same time if thy give importance to other sports it will be good.




Posted By: Aarthi

Hi ppl



It’s a very interesting topic to be discussed with. Nowadays people have a craze towards cricket. They are giving importance only to cricket. So the talents of the athletes in the other games r left unnoticed. Plus there r more sponsors 4 crickets than other games. Y don they sponsor 4 other games too????????????? Young minds r like molded soil. They r flexible. So parents shud impart their children abt the importance of sports in their young ages which all give them confidence n fillip to participate in sports in the future. This ails Indian sports

Any opposition 4 this??????????????????????????????????

Posted By: pooja

Hello friends,

I agree with what all my friends has said as there is no much interest left in the parents to make their child a sportsman as it requires lots of money to invest and then after training also there is no guarantee that he will get selected as in that field more recommendations will plays the imp role but not the talent so according to me govt should take the initiative they should train all the children based on their talent, by seeing their performance they perform in their schools, even parents should understand their child's interest and should work accordingly by allowing them to take trainings and becoming the future sports person...

Posted By: sriya

Hi

According to me, one of the reasons for fewer sportsmen in our country might be because of lack of encouragement from parents as well as from schools. In many colleges they are not allocating time for games, which shows us the priority sports are being given. Many schools don’t conduct games hour or sports hour as it conducts special classes. A healthy body is a sign of good mind. So, I think sports must be given the same priority as studies and the schools n colleges must conduct sports hour for all the students at least every alternate day and they must provide good coaching for the students in whichever sports they are interested so that students who are interested in having sports as an career will be benefited.

Posted By: saurabh

TODAY OUR SPORTSMAN LACKS BEHIND BECAUSE THE SPORTS AUTHORITY IS NOT CONCERN ABOUT THE FACILITIES THAT THEY PROVIDE TO THESE SPORTSMAN.

A SPORTSMAN OF INDIA NEVER GETS A WORLD CLASS FACILITIES, SO HOW CAN THE GOVERMENT CAN THINK OF MEDALS .THE SPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA IS FULL OF POLITICS, ANJU BOBBY GEORGE WHEN RETURNED TO INDIA AFETR WINNING MEDAL, THEN WHEN SHE WAS ON THE ROUTINE TRANING IN THE STADIUM, AFTER THE SESSION SHE HAS TO HIRE A AUTO SHARING WITH OTHER TWO GIRLS, WHEN THIS MATTER WAS ASKED BY THE AUTHORITY, THEY REPLIED THAT THIS IS NOT OUR DUTY, IS THIS WAY U TREAT U'R CHAMP.

AND WORST CONDITION IS IN OUR NATIONAL GAME HOCKEY, MR GILL IS ACTING LIKE A BULLY IN THIS FIELD, MAKING CONDITION WORST FOR THE PLAYERS, HE IS NOT ALLOWING THE PLAYERS TO PLAY IN THE BEST LEAGUE "THE HOLLAND LEAGUE" IN FREE SEASON.SO THAT THEY CAN IMPROVE THEIR GAME, EVEN HE HAS SHOWN DOOR TO DANRAJ PILLAI .THE CONDITION IS GETTING WORSE..................




Posted By: rathour

Hi frnds

I agreed with all of u but what meena told that’s right. Frnds, scenario of our India is different 70% population are from villages and all most r from a middle class family. So I feel, parents don’t want to see their children as a sports person bcoz they think sports r a way of entertainment and wasting of time. Parents think after completing study their children will earn a handsome salary.definetly sport like tennis, cricket has its own crazy n a lot of money but now sports steeped in bureaucracy and it has become a ground of politics. So everyone feel that his or her carrier is not secure in game.

So my view is that there should not be a battle of politics in the sports and there should be awareness in people from their childhood about sports.



Before few months there was only crazy of cricket but now people r crazy to watch SANIA MIRZA and her ricket.why? Bcoz of her miracles in court.

So I think, our government should also take a step for empowerment of sports. The person whom have interest but bcoz of laking of resources they just kill their dream for being a perfect sports person.

If there will be good sports academy at least 1/2 in a distant they will search hidden talents and if they will train the dynamic youth then I am damn sure we will find out several sachin, sania, anand etc.and also we will be able to make a place in the world sport, by this way we can make our image in even our national game what we have lost today.

But frnd only these steps are not enough to stand a heavy body on a weak foot. So government should take care of these sports person, all need should be provided to the sportsperson by government. All sports person will feel their carrier is save and secure then even parent will allow their children.

Posted By: madhu_reddi

Hi,

Well, there are many reasons for this issue. At I fell is that, according to my knowledge there are so many best players are there in our nation, but the thing is that they r not coming into the real life, why bcoz they do not know the possibilities to participate in the compitions. The people do not have awareness of the oppertunites. Even the people and their parents do not know the rules and regulations of the game, but they can play well when compare to other players.

They need to boost up, the youth, govt and some organizations can do this. So youth should come forward to encourage the people. The secondary thing is that, due to politics. Some polities are ruling the country; generally they will do the things for their family members and well wishers not for the people. They never bother abt the nation and the talent people.

Only few people are having both talent and money. These people can easily shine, why bcoz they r having a strong support. Even if these people do not shine in this field, they r having alternative their parents will take care for these people. But the people who came from the remote places, they do not have any other source. So the people cannot come to the real life. Does banning fashion shows and New Year parties save our culture?


Does banning fashion shows and New Year parties save our culture?Replies:

Posted By: suresh_patike

Yes if we banning the fashion shows and New Year parties then there is a chance to save the Indian culture. Our India culture is greatest culture in the world. In previous days these fashion shows and parties are not at all celebrated. Now days just we have been following the British culture last when we got independence. So need not follow these extra cultural activities. Now a days in India so many girls and boys following the they were seen in the fashion shows.

So we must ban these activities

Posted By: BINNY

I don’t think we should ban fashion shows and New Year parties. We should limit the nudity displayed in these shows. No body can justify that these are Western cultures. We have been following these parties since ancient ages. The kings use to celebrate by arranging dances & drinks in their courtyard.

We are just giving a 20 the century touch to these parties by arranging DJ's and Re-Mix dances.



Posted By: ozobalu

No

It’s an art of culture

Fashion is necessary to bring out new creation to change our life

So it’s all-useful one to our dream come true


Yes

Fashion shows and new year Parties should be banned.b's we can say yes to these things when they didn’t have impact on Indian culture, but they have large impact on our culture.

Due to these parties and all shows even girls have started cultivating the habit of taking drinks, which totally damages our culture.

I dint mean that these are the only way that girls are spoiled but it plays a major role.

Posted By: ramesh_ram143

Hi

Good morning everybody. It is somewhat difficult to decide that banning of fashion shows and New Year parties save our culture or not, but I personally feel that it does not spoil our culture. Today their r many corporate employees and other people work all the days. They will be much interested to attend these types of parties just for refreshment.

But these types of parties should be held with out vulgar activities it should be up to the limits. I think it is the part of our culture because we have these types of parties from our ancient days. The kings used to arrange these types of parties during events such as after winning the war etc.,

Finally I think if these parties are held without vulgarity they do not spoil our culture.

Does banning fashion shows and New Year parties save our culture?



Posted By: rocku_354

In my opinion, just by conducting parties and taking part in enjoyment, no one forgets the native culture. It is just for that moment that the culture is adopted.

If we are eating in a Chinese restaurant it doesn’t mean that we forgot our culture!

Moreover Indians are quite orthodox people inherently. If they were not orthodox, India would have its culture ruined by this time because of British rule.

Vulgarity in parties is a strict no. But are there any people to prevent it from happening? Yes there are!

It is we and our mental strength that helps us protect our culture. So foreign cultures not do carry lets away.

At the same time respect all cultures.

Posted By: Dr YVS

Yes, they shall be banned in present form. Whether we preserve our culture or not, we will not be left out as APES. We had many more tremendous cultural events, which we are ignoring and mimicking these from somewhere. Why not we take the good part and continue. Is it not someone commercial exploitation, we are all becoming scapegoats and payers????? What’s culture...something practiced by maximum lot. Read old books, bring the best out. While whole world says, lot of management techniques is in ancient Hindu books.... none of us READ even one. Starting from DRESSING, MIXING, Dances...ban.ban...ban completely...NO other thinking till they are shown as either stress relievers at least.



Posted By: suresh_patike

Hello Mr. binny,

I think u may be right but aim trying to say that when the person doesn’t cross their following limits. Then only u r aspect may correct that’s it. Its only depends on person attitude.

Posted By: sidhu

Hi,

Banning of fashion shows & parties does it make any sense, come-on, hey it's not foreign culture, let me specific on this, even if it is, wt's wrong in adopting things like, but at the same time, we shouldn't forget our culture activites, In my opinion” adopt new things but not leave old things", I think, I made my point clear.

Posted By: BINNY

Hi Sidhu,

I really appreciate your opinion "Adopt new things but do not leave old things "

Great




Posted By: sowmya571

Hello

Well Banning Things will not eradicate rite ... Since society is changing continuously we need to adopt to the changing things and keep us pace with current issues ... That also doesn’t mean that we are ignoring current culture n traditions so that to protect them still we need to ban them.



A very good example is Indian still celebrate all the cultural festivals in the same way after more than 50 years of independence. Even people at abroad still celebrate them in same way.

Westernization has affected us; But Indians in some areas still remain Indians...

We need not have to ban things, for issues

Bye

Posted By: sriya

Hi friends,

I don’t accept in banning fashion shows, New Year parties. The shows must not be banned but in the name of fashion show, the models are made to dress up more vulgarly, this must be stopped. If vulgarity is reduced, then there will be no problem with fashion shows. We only celebrate New Year parties for fun purpose. But if anything is within the limit then it doesn’t make an issue. Its only when we cross our limits, we result in degrading our culture.

Posted By: mohanraai

Well Guys,

I thanked all, gives various arguments. In my opinion is "it will not affect our culture, if person aware of this culture". U take this as our culture, then where is right and wrong arguments are came. If these activities did not come to India then, no body knows about this activities and also this will leads to some kind of issues. So any culture we can celebrate but with some limitations and aware of this culture.

"The person remembers many times in his mind enemies rather than friends".

Posted By: ganesh

Hay

Good Afternoon 2 one and all,

I think

Banning of fashion shows and New Year parties prevent our great Indian culture to some extent only. Mainly our culture depends on the Youth. So if u has capacity to change the youth, then u can save our culture.

Of course, Our Culture is great all over the world, no doubt at all

But the main prob is we just inherit the culture of western, But one thing u have to remember, "Extract good and leave the bad".

Then only we will prevent our culture




Posted By: JotiN

Hi, all

I don’t agree with this statement. Banning fashion show and parties never save our culture. We need to ban vulgarity in those moments. The nudity should come down, even in older days our kings used to do parties and dance fairs. They were not vulgar; there was no nudity in those shows. We have to enjoy but have to remember not to insult out Great Culture.

Have a Great DAY,

Posted By: JotiN

Hi, all

I don’t agree with this statement. Banning fashion show and parties never save our culture. We need to ban vulgarity in those moments. The nudity should come down, even in older days our kings used to do parties and dance fairs. They were not vulgar; there was no nudity in those shows. We have to enjoy but have to remember not to insult out Great Culture.

Have a Great DAY



Posted By: keerthi

Hello friends,

Banning fashion shows and New Year parties may save our culture to a great extent. But as it became a part of our culture now better use them in the best way to preserve our culture.

Yes in olden days kings used to organize parties and dances. But there is no obscenity in them. The dances were organized in cultural manner. It may not be possible to ban partys. Only thing is people must realize their limits.

Coming to fashion shows I think there were no fashion shows during the olden days. Bcoz there were a few designers who used to design traditional clothes.

Where as today why people organize a fashion show? The purpose may be to show the new designs. But many watch them to see and enjoy but not to admire the new creations of designers. This greatly degrades our culture and dignity of the women.

I accept that it’s not possible to ban them completely and we need not ban them also, Bcoz that is one way to display the new creations of various designers. Instead of that I think there must be certain limits regarding the nudity and obscenity.

Posted By: Nani

Yes it can be save our Indian culture. But only this step is not enough for saving our tradition and culture.

People from other country know about our culture and traditions and we are leaving our culture and going for other culture and we are naming to that as "FASHION”. It’s very shameful for us.

So my conclusion is not only this one is save our tradition but also we have to take some more steps to protect our culture

Posted By: cishawsharma

I my opinion anything, which is banned, will get more popularity.

I.e. people will b more anxious to know what the matter is. So take it as it comes.

In this 21st century no one can stop the other. If u bans it do u think people will stop going to those places??? noo

Try to show in your way what fashion is. Try to influence people about our culture and tradition.

It all depends upon our environment where we are from.

But yes vulgarity should be banned.

neeraj Rating: said this on 07 Oct 2007 1:49:19 PM CDT i am totally disagree with the fact that banning fashin shows and party will preserve our culture. we conduct party just for fun and enjoyment.it is justt a way of presenting or celebrating occasion. if we are so possisive abut the western cuture then why only party should be banned. we should banned everything that is given by tthem.we should intead of wearing shirtts and pants we should wore only dhoti.we should totally avoid computers,tv etc. so can u imagine life without them .i don't think so. another thing which i would like to point out is taht western culture belives in equality.it does not have any difference between boys / girls. it does not have child marriage ,child labour . so the basic thing is that we should adopt good things from the western culture and avoid the bad concept.(Reply to this comment)

Mrunalini Rating: said this on 23 May 2010 8:05:30 PM CDT ya i totally agree with you neeraj. I think we should take good things from them and avoid bad things like wearing explosive dresses,drinking,live-in relationships and so on(Reply to this comment)

neha Rating: said this on 27 Aug 2010 7:15:15 PM CDT i like the way u r thinking.u r point out this thought very nicely.(Reply to this comment)

gayu Rating: said this on 26 Sep 2012 5:37:09 AM CDT super(Reply to this comment)

ashok Rating: said this on 05 Nov 2007 12:57:47 AM CDT yes, i have read all this artical every body try to give there opinion but i thing it should not be banned we are on a developing stage & all this things have support for this , when we r try to compare our country to others we have to adopt this things if some people enjoying in this then what the problem for ban it (Reply to this comment)

TRISHU SHARMA Rating:


said this on 11 Feb 2010 11:57:02 AM CDT i dont agree with this statement.......as fashion shows and new year party have their own importance.we need to ban vulgarity and nudity in these shows,as these are the the main factors which insult our culture.we should adopt western culture in possitive way and give preference to our culture.(Reply to this comment)

Mrunalini Rating: said this on 23 May 2010 8:11:34 PM CDT you absolutely right Trishu....I disagree with whatever Ashok has mentioned in his statement,... for comparing our country with others we dont have to follow the wrong things and which are totally against our culture and tradition..(Reply to this comment)

mithu Rating: said this on 17 Jul 2010 4:24:44 PM CDT wondreful(Reply to this comment)

bala Rating: said this on 17 Aug 2010 11:15:32 PM CDT hai,, on seeing all above statements,, in my point of view fashin show should not be banned and it should be taken in good way(Reply to this comment)

suman Rating: said this on 23 Aug 2010 4:40:08 AM CDT Evry coin has two faces.now it depends on us what do we want to see.instead of banning fashion and new year parties ,we should expand our mental horizons.change is the need of time.If v want to live,we hv 2 change ourselves a/c 2 change env.otherwise we willn't survive.living in 21st century &talking abt 19th century shows our conservative ideas.wearing western dresses doesn't means v hv forgot our culture.ou culture resides inside and is shown by our behaviour,ideas and thoughts(Reply to this comment)

salotra Rating: said this on 06 Dec 2010 2:40:36 PM CDT Frnds,after seeing all your thoughts , you all are right in your approach but as India has diversified culture and tradition. People in rural areas constitute 73%of total area and they are confined to there own ways where as urban life style is adopting westernlies at fast pace.So, its not about banning parties and fashion but not to do it at the cost of their personal sentiments as they represent Real indian culture. Do as all can enjoy together not that others have to close there eyes.Less vulgarity and respect for all.....(Reply to this comment)

K.dhinesh Rating: said this on 01 Jul 2011 3:26:46 PM CDT do the best(Reply to this comment)

sivaranjani Rating: said this on 20 Aug 2011 11:18:01 AM CDT i never accept the statement tha "Banning fashion will save our country".. we should take the fashion show in our culture,instead of following the foreigners...(Reply to this comment)

Mass Rating: said this on 28 Dec 2011 7:46:42 AM CDT Everythn depends on d self control of each n every individual n so i dnt thnk banning wud work out coz it wud surely bring mre popularity....:p(Reply to this comment)

narcotic Rating: said this on 07 Aug 2012 9:09:10 AM CDT i think banning of fashion shows and parties may not preserve our culture.fashion shows are merely conducted to exhibit the new designs and the forecoming trends.they give us a scope to cope up with the changing fashions.they help us to update ourselves.And coming to parties,patry cultre is not new to us,its been continuing from times long.even our kings who were known for preserving our culture used to indulge in parties.nothing wrong in having parties and its going to do nothing with our culture

IS DOWRY NECESSARY FOR TWO PEOPLE TO GET MARRIED?


IS DOWRY NECESSARY FOR TWO PEOPLE TO GET MARRIED?Replies:

Posted By: pooja

Hello frnds,

I totally disagree with the concept of dowry I mean we should completely ban this concept. So many women are getting harass and they are getting killed cos of dowry and many of them are taking steps like they are attempting suicides which is a very shameless act so we have got the power we can change the world as only youth can change the world so youth should decide that they are not going to take dowries.

Even taking dowry is a crime but more crime is giving dowries so we should come forward to eradicate it from our society.



Posted By: sowmya571

Hello

Well I totally disagree for the sole reason that a person shud take dowry 4 marriage. Since when compared a guy will jus do a job, but a female will take care of home, her job as well as kids and lot more...

And also what is more important is AFFECTION n LOVE 4 each other rather than all these things. I guess guys shud think reg this and change them

Posted By: Vision

Hey sowmya

My sister always wants me to take dowry & even my Mom too.

Like this lot of females supporting dowry. Not only guys but also girls also should think of it. They better not to enocourage their children and brothers to take dowry.

What you say sowmya?

Posted By: Vision

Have a look at this:

http://www.indianchild.com/dowry_in_india.htm - http://www.indianchild.com/dowry_in_india.htm

Posted By: rathour

Hi frnds

I agreed with "pooja's" view.definetly DOWERY is a curse

Of sociaty.people think if they r taking more dowry they get prestige in society .so there should be awareness.

1stly,it should be banned. Women are getting harass and they are getting killed bcoz of dowry and many of them are taking steps like they are attempting suicides.

We should come forward to eradicate it from our society. But it’s not an easy task. To eradicate the dowry from our sociaty, there should be awareness among youth especially in Indian woman.

There should be awareness from childhood. To give and take dowry both r declared as a crime. If any one is caught he/she should be punished.

Documents

3 responses to