35
8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement

Implications for District and State Policy

Page 2: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE) Presentation (April, 2011)

Trish Williams & Matt Rosin, EdSource Jennifer O’Day, American Institutes for

Research shared lessons and perspectives from the

California Collaborative on District Reform (CCDR) districts on student access and success in algebra and higher level mathematics.

Deborah V.H. Sigman, CA Depart. of Ed. explored the implications for CA in light of the

recent adoption of the Common Core State Standards, especially for 8th grade math.

Page 3: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Central Issue of Forum

Placing all 8th grade students in Algebra I to ensure equal access, regardless of prior math preparation. What’s the right thing to do? And how will the adoption of common

core math standards change the state’s expectations around this issue?

Page 4: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

The California Context: Algebra I in the 8th Grade

Feb 2008

US Department of Education declares CA’s General Math test covers “out of level” content for 8th grade.

Spring 2008

With SBE approval, CDE explores development of a new 8th grade test based on a subset of CA’s Algebra I standards.

July 2008

Instead of pursuing the blueprint, SBE makes Algebra I CST the sole test of record for NCLB.

Sept 2008

CSBA, ACSA, CTA, the SSPI file lawsuit to block SBE decision.

Jan 2009

Sac. County Superior Court ruling blocks SBE from taking further action to implement its motion. SBE is (1) appealing they acted outside of their authority, but (2) not appealing violation of the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act.

Page 5: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

CA’s Current and Future Context

8th graders may take either the General Math or the Algebra I test

Rumors of a timeline to phase out General Math Test

Hope: The Common Core will end this debate by outlining a new view of 8th Grade Mathematics

Page 6: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Preparation, Placement, Proficiency Improving Middle Grades Math Performance

Matt RosinSr. Research Associate

EdSource

Page 7: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Extends analysis of longitudinal data

Based on data originally gathered for the report Gaining Ground in the Middle Grades:

Why Some School Do Better (2010)

Preparation, Placement, Proficiency Improving Middle Grades Math Performance (EdSource, Feb. 2011)

Page 8: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Data Include:

3 surveys (900 items) teachers (n=3,752) principals (n=303) superintendents (n=157)

questions about policy and practices in the middle grades

2009 the 7th and 8th grade math and Algebra I CST scores of 70,000 California students.

Page 9: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Pam’s Overview of EdSource Findings

1. Participation in Algebra I has definitely increased.2. Schools serving low-income students placed

greater percentages in Algebra I.3. Participation for all does not mean success for all.4. What is the proficiency level of Algebra I

students?5. How do placement decisions correspond to level

of preparedness?6. Survey of District and School Placement Policies7. State policy on 8th grade course taking.

Page 10: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Increased Participation in Algebra I

From 2003 to 2008 many more 8th grade students take Algebra I

1999 2003 2008*

CA 16% 32% 51%

African American

24% 47%

Latino 26% 48%*5% of 7th

graders now take as well

Page 11: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Estimated Participation Rates of 8th Graders in Algebra I

Page 12: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

EdSource’s Placement Analysis Findings

The math preparation of incoming 8th grade Algebra I students varied widely Many with low levels of preparedness

where placed into a full Algebra I course. Schools serving mostly low-income

students placed higher percentages of students into Algebra I than did schools serving mostly middle income students.

Page 13: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Proportion of 8th Graders taking Algebra I CST

based on incoming 7th grade Math CST

Page 14: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Placement Variations Regardless of level of preparedness,

schools serving low-income students placed greater percentages into Algebra I in grade 8 than schools serving middle-income.

At each of the three lowest levels of preparedness low-income 8th graders where roughly twice as likely to be placed in a full Algebra I course as were similarly prepared 8th graders in middle-income schools.

Page 15: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Participation For All ≠ Success for All

Growth in participation was accompanied by an increase in numbers scoring advanced or proficient

however there are still many students not succeeding in Algebra I and have to repeat it once or more

Also increase in number of students taking the

9th grade Algebra I course as well

Page 16: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Trends in Algebra I Proficiency The number of 8th grade students

taking Algebra I is increasing. The percent scoring proficient or higher

has also increased.

Proportion of 8th Graders … 2003 2010

taking algebra I 32% 57%

taking algebra I and scoring proficient or

higher

39% 46%

Page 17: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Scale of Change Since 2003

1.8 times as many 8th graders (≈ 104,100) scored proficient or advanced

At the same time, 1.5 times as many 8th graders (≈ 76,800) scored below basic or far below basic

Page 18: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

47%55%

22%

30%

17%

24%

20%

29%

25%

20%

28%

24%

29%

50%

28%

43%

28%

54%

26%

50% 29%

51%

29%

42%

Page 19: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Data Tell Two Stories

One is about African American and Latino students succeeding when provided access to algebra I in grade 8, where as in previous years that may not have had access.

Another is about the unintended consequences of placing more 8th graders in Algebra I.

Page 20: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Select Findings from the Placement AnalysisPreparation score on 7th grade math

CST

Most Prepared

high proficient or

advanced

Moderately prepared

high basic or low proficient

Least prepared low basic or

lower

% of Algebra I Students in this Category

≈ 30% over 30% nearly 40%

Level of Algebra I Achievement

Generally these

students scored

proficient or higher on the Algebra I CST

Present a mixed picture.

Generally these students didn’t score proficient or higher on the Algebra I CST – though most

scored at least basic.

Generally these students did not

even score at the basic level. More alarming

is these students’ poor

performance on the General Math test.Placement Decisions?

Page 21: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Proportion of 8th Graders Scoring Proficient or Higheron the General Math and Algebra I CSTs based on incoming 7th grade Math CST

Page 22: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Proportion of 8th Graders Scoring Proficient or Higheron the General Math and Algebra I CSTs based on incoming 7th grade Math CST

Generally these students did not score proficient or higher on the Algebra I CST, though most scored at least basic.

Page 23: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Critical Question for Research The Algebra I achievement of

students scoring high basic or low proficient on 7th grade CST presents a mixed picture. A portion of these students do well on

Algebra I we need to find out more about the

conditions under which 20% of 8th graders who scored high basic in grade 7 and were placed in Algebra I succeeded in scoring proficient or higher on the CST.

Page 24: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

8th Graders In General Math

Proportion of 8th Graders … 2003 2008

taking General Math 60% 43%

taking General Math and score proficient or

higher24% 31%

Many taking the General Math test have limited success.

Page 25: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Students Currently Taking General Math Assessment

General Mathematics Not yet taking Algebra I In the first or second year of a two-

or three-year Algebra I course Taking any mathematics course

prior to Algebra I Taking no mathematics course

Page 26: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Other Findings on Algebra I Proficiency High Proficient: 37% of 8th graders who scored

high-proficient in grade 7 and were placed in Algebra I scored no higher than basic on the Algebra I CST.

All: Roughly 40% of those who took the algebra test scored basic.

All: Fully 29% of 8th graders who took the Algebra I CST in 2010 (≈ 80,000 students) scored below basic or far below basic.

More economically disadvantaged 8th graders scored below basic or far below basic on the Algebra I CST in 2010 than took the test at all in 2003.

Page 27: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Findings on 8th Grade Algebra I

District and School Placement Policies

Page 28: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Select Findings on District and School Practice Districts often leave key aspects of

placement to school sites. School sites vary in their placement

practices – but the most common goal is ensuring wide access to rigorous curricula.

Schools with higher math achievement in grade 8 are intentional in their efforts to ensure curricular coherence and to evaluate student outcomes and instructional needs.

Page 29: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

School Practices with Higher Grade 8th Math Achievement

Emphasis on select key standards The C&I program are designed to ensure all

students are “high-school ready” Emphasize and set measureable goals Informed by review and use of students

assessment data District prioritizes early identification of

students needing academic support Places students into general math course in

grade 7 and/or 8 take into account prior CST scores

Page 30: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Algebra I & the Common Core

Next Steps?

Page 31: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Mathematics Grade 8“The California State Board of Education acknowledges that the goal for 8th grade students is Algebra I. However, they also recognize that not all 8th grade students have the necessary prerequisite skills for Algebra I. Consequently, the State Board of Education adopted two sets of standards for 8th grade. The first set describes standards for Algebra I.”

Source: K-12 California’s Common Core Content Standards for Mathematics, p. 33

Page 32: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Mathematics Grade 8 (cont.)“The second set of standards is from the 8th grade Common Core document published June 2, 2010. These standards are for 8th grade students who do not have the necessary prerequisite skills for Algebra I. The goal of the 8th grade Common Core is to finalize the mathematics preparation for students in high school. There is some duplication of standards between grades and courses that will be resolved in the frameworks/instructional materials development process.”

Source: K-12 California’s Common Core Content Standards for Mathematics, p. 33

Page 33: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Assessment Consortia National consortia assessments will

be designed to measure the common core released by the National Governors Association and Council of Chief State School Officers

Grade 8 CCSS in Mathematics will be assessed

State specific standards will not be addressed

Page 34: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Pam’s Overview of EdSource Findings

1. Participation in Algebra I has definitely increased.2. Schools serving low-income students placed

greater percentages in Algebra I.3. Participation for all does not mean success for all.4. What is the proficiency level of Algebra I

students?5. How do placement decisions correspond to level

of preparedness?6. Survey of District and School Placement Policies7. State policy on 8th grade course taking.

Page 35: 8th Grade Math Placement and Achievement Implications for District and State Policy

Pamela Tyson, PhDDirector of Educational ServicesContra Costa County Office of

Education

[email protected]