33
A Climate of Controversy – The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World West Central Florida AMS Local Chapter Hillsborough Community College Presented by Prof. James Wysong, Jr.

A Climate of Controversy – The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

  • Upload
    errin

  • View
    19

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A Climate of Controversy – The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World. Presented by Prof. James Wysong , Jr. Hillsborough Community College. West Central Florida AMS Local Chapter. Don’t Believe Everything You Think. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

A Climate of Controversy – The Danger of Scientific

Illiteracy in a Changing World

West Central Florida AMS Local Chapter Hillsborough Community College

Presented by Prof. James Wysong, Jr.

Page 2: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

Don’t Believe Everything You Think

But think about everything you believe – then ask yourself why?

Who is this curious fellow?

Page 3: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

The Questions at Hand:The Questions at Hand:

Why is scientific illiteracy dangerous?Why do so many people believe in

nonsense? (and reject rational ideas in the process)

What is the role of professionals, including meteorologists and educators in combating this problem?

Why do you believe what you do?

Page 4: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

What is Science?What is Science?

In its simplest definition, science is a way of knowing. The word comes down to us from the Latin word scientia – meaning "to know."

Page 5: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

Science and SuperstitionScience and Superstition

For the greatest part of human history, people lived in ignorance of the workings of the natural world that surrounded them. The world of our ancestors was often a cruel and mysterious place.

Page 6: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

The Power of ScienceThe Power of Science

Science today offers explanations for phenomena.

It makes predictions that guide us in the quest for further understanding.

It is a self-correcting, ever-compounding means of gaining knowledge about the universe that we inhabit.

Page 7: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World
Page 8: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

Mistakes will happen

Page 9: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

Paradigms will change

Page 10: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

“All our science, measured against reality, is primitive and childlike – and yet it is the most precious thing we have.”

Albert Einstein

Page 11: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

Einstein’s words remind us that science does not have all the answers. We still have much to learn. Science shows us the way to knowing, it is, as the late Carl Sagan referred to it, “A candle in the dark".

Page 12: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

Does science threaten our beliefs?Does science threaten our beliefs?

What scares some people about the findings of science is the same thing that scares them about the truth in many other matters – it may differ from what we have already decided to believe.

The philosopher Henre Poincare observed: “We also know how cruel the truth often is, and we wonder whether delusion is not more consoling.”

Page 13: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”

Dr. Richard Feynman

Nobel Laureate

Page 14: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

What Don’t We Like About Science? What Don’t We Like About Science?

We like certainty – science often only gives us probabilities.

We like simple answers, but that’s not always what we get from science.

Sometimes scientific answers are counterintuitive – and we don’t like that!

Yes! Humid air really is lighter!

Page 15: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

An educated person is one who has learned that information almost always turns out to be at best

incomplete and very often false, misleading, fictitious, mendacious -

just dead wrong.

Russell Baker

Page 16: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

What is the basis of our beliefs? What is the basis of our beliefs?

We seldom “choose” our religion or political ideology – we are born into it.

When it comes to scientific evidence on societal risks “people endorse which position reinforces their connection to others with whom they share important commitments.” 

Dan Kahan in Nature (1/20/2010, 463, 296-297) - The Psychology of the Resistance to Social Change Thinking

Page 17: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

What is the basis of our beliefs?What is the basis of our beliefs?

This leads to adopting “no thinking required” “positions” (on the Left and the Right)

Alternatively, we “cherry pick” data to support a priori beliefs.

In particular, the Internet has increased the incidence of selective exposure, (more commonly called confirmation bias or biased assimilation).1

1 True Enough: Learning to Live in a Post-Fact Society by Farhad Manjoo (Wiley, 2008)

Page 18: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

Wouldn’t it be nice if……?

That’s what science and critical thinking are for.

Page 19: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

“ “He that cannot reason is a He that cannot reason is a fool.fool. He that will not is a He that will not is a bigot.bigot. He that dare not is a He that dare not is a slave.”slave.”

Andrew CarnegieAndrew Carnegie

Page 20: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

Communication or Obfuscation Communication or Obfuscation Doubt – the double-edged sword“Fair and Balanced” - Should we always

frame things as a debate? Why?Are you listening, or waiting to talk?You might not be wrong – but are you

right?

Page 21: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

The intelligent man finds almost everything ridiculous, the sensible man almost nothing.

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Ignorance is bliss, sensibility is comfortable, informed skepticism can be unsettling.

Page 22: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

Where do people get their news? Is this also where they get their views?

Page 23: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

Another brick in the wall…….Roger Waters wrote this about his views on formal education. He hated his grammar school teachers and felt they were more interested in keeping the

kids quiet than teaching them to think.

We don’t need no education (OH YES WE DO!)

Page 24: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

The survey of 1,000 U.S. Likely Voters was conducted on October 4-5, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence

Public PerceptionsPublic Perceptions59 percent1 are convinced that global

warming is happening. 39 percent2 now believe that global

warming is caused mainly by human activities

42 percent3 believe it is caused mostly by natural changes in the environment.

As compared to 2007 data from a similar survey:1 Down from 71% in 2007 2 Down from 69% 3Up from 29%

Page 25: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

Public PerceptionsPublic Perceptions

48 percent believe that there is consensus among the scientific community.

40 percent believe there is a lot of disagreement among scientists over whether global warming is occurring.

American Opinions on Global Warming: SummaryA Yale University / Gallup / ClearVision Institute Poll - 2007

Principal Investigator: Dr. Anthony Leiserowitz - School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Yale University

Page 26: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

Perspective on public beliefs:Perspective on public beliefs:

42% believe in ghosts32% believe in UFOs26% believe in astrology23% believe in witches20% believe in reincarnation – that they

were once another person.

Harris Poll of 2,303 adults surveyed online between November 2 and 11, 2009 by Harris Interactive.

“Everybody needs to believe in something….I believe I’ll have another drink” W.C. Fields

Page 27: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

A thought as Halloween approaches:

More Americans believe in ghosts than Anthropogenic Climate Change (can we presume that they feel the evidence is more conclusive?)

Now that’s spooky!

Page 28: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

AMS and NWA T.V. Meteorologists

54 percent indicated that global warming is happening.

31 percent reported that global warming is caused mostly by human activities

63 percent reported it is caused mostly by natural changes in the environment.

Maibach, E., Wilson, K & Witte, J. (2010) A National Survey of Television Meteorologists about Climate Change: Preliminary Findings. George Mason University.

Fairfax, VA: Center for Climate Change Communication.

Credentials of respondents:A.M.S. –CBM seal: 28.7%, A.M.S. Seal of Approval: 55%, N.W.A. Seal of Approval: 33.3%

n = ~500-550 depending on the question

Page 29: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

AMS and NWA T.V. Meteorologists

93 percent said they are fairly or very well informed about the causes of global warming.

30 percent said they could easily change their mind about global warming.

27 percent agreed with the statement by a prominent TV weathercaster1: “global warming is a scam.”

Maibach, E., Wilson, K & Witte, J. (2010) A National Survey of Television Meteorologists about Climate Change: Preliminary Findings. George Mason University.

Fairfax, VA: Center for Climate Change Communication.

John Coleman – Co-founder of the Weather Channel™

n = ~500-550 depending on the question

Page 30: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

Some data to consider:Some data to consider:

A 2010 paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States reviewed publication and citation data for 1,372 climate researchers and resulted in the following two conclusions:

(i) 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC (Anthropogenic Climate Change) outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and

(ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.

Page 31: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

Some Concluding Thoughts:

We are human, and inherently subject to biases and irrationality – we have to guard against this.

Opinions are fine – when labeled as such. In the professions where we enjoy the

public’s trust, we must exercise great care.

We must keep thinking!

Page 32: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

“My idea of education is to unsettle the minds of the young and inflame their

intellects.” Robert Maynard Hutchins  

Page 33: A Climate of Controversy –  The Danger of Scientific Illiteracy in a Changing World

Thank You for Your Kind Attention –

please keep thinking.

Jim Wysong