31
A PURPOSEFUL & INTEGRATIVE APPROACH TO ENGAGING SOPHOMORES Dan Stypa & Jenna Schwartz

A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

  • Upload
    aquene

  • View
    43

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores. Dan Stypa & Jenna Schwartz. Session Outline. Review of the Literature & Theory Review data collected from 2 universities Designing your own Sophomore Year Experience Implications for Practice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

A PURPOSEFUL & INTEGRATIVE APPROACH TO ENGAGING SOPHOMORES

Dan Stypa & Jenna Schwartz

Page 2: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Session Outline Review of the Literature & Theory Review data collected from 2 universities Designing your own Sophomore Year

Experience Implications for Practice Different approaches to address

sophomore needs

Page 3: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

We want to hear from YOU!

37607

Page 4: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

The “Sophomore Slump”

Feeling as though they are forgotten, sophomores begin to experience the sophomore slump, a period when students “…[experience] a small number of special programs, few contacts with major professors, few positions of campus leadership, and little attention” (Pattengale & Schreiner, 2000)

Sophomores report feeling a lack of… satisfaction with faculty interactions commitment to academic major satisfaction with academic advising leadership opportunities support from student affairs professionals

(Finning-Kwoka, et al., 2007)

Page 5: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Supporting Research Key aspects of the sophomore year that are

important to promote persistence Faculty engagement Involvement Supportive relationships Intentional programming

(Gohn et al., 2001 and Pattengale & Schreiner, 2000)

Given the proper support and challenge, campus environments can be created to positively influence outcomes such as learning and persistence

Page 6: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Theoretical Framework Astin’s (1993) College Impact Model

Simple explanation for a complex phenomenon (the effect of experiences on college student outcomes)

Retention and Persistence (outcomes) is a function of the Expectations (inputs) and Experiences (environment)

The relationship between the inputs and the environment has an influence on the outcome

Given the proper support and challenge, environments can be created to positively influence outcomes such as learning & persistence.

Astin’s theory grounded this research and supports assertions about the role of positive relationships between the expectations and experiences of sophomores on persistence.

Page 7: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

We want to hear from YOU!

37607

Page 8: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Institution 1 Large, research I university of 25,000 in the Southeast

Sent electronically to all 1,200 residential sophomores

Assessed four key areas: Students’ relationships with faculty Commitment to major Perceptions of university services Self-identified issues that sophomores experienced

These areas were assessed based on prior research to determine its applicability to its sophomores

Page 9: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Institution 1 Survey results (N=190) suggest the

importance and need for formal programs & services for sophomores 36%: Did not believe faculty was

committed to sophomore success 53%: Found it difficult to make a

connection between courses and academic major

73%: Struggle managing time during their sophomore year

Page 10: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Institution 2 Large, research I university of 48,000 in

the South 10 questions Sent to students sophomore and above

Used Google forms Sent via email

Reminder emails 62 out of 250 responded

Page 11: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Classification

8%

29%

26%

27%

10%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

First Year

Second Year

Third Year

Fourth Year

Fourth Year +

Year

in s

choo

l

Number of participants

Page 12: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

How was your overall satisfaction with your Sophomore year?

19%

45%

32%

4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

ExceedsExpectations

MeetsExpectations

Neutral

Did Not MeetExpectations

Sati

sfac

tion

Percent

Page 13: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

57%

56%

55%

47%

31%

26%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Getting Involved

Academics

Career Exploration

Meeting New People

Finding out who you are

Feeling Connected to USF

Percent

Answ

er C

hoic

esWhich of the following programing topics would have been

the most helpful to you in your Sophomore year?

Institution 2

Page 14: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

In scheduling future programs, what topics are of most interest to you?

66%

63%

61%

50%

47%

45%

41%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Internships

Networking

Study Abroad

Campus Activities

Meeting New People

Academics

Career Exploration

Answ

er C

hoic

es

Percent

Page 15: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

What type of programs might you attend?

79%

79%

55%

50%

40%

37%

2%

2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

Movies

Hands On Activities

Sports

Discussions

On-Going Projects

Lectures

Community Service

None

Answ

er C

hoic

es

Percent

Page 16: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

What would be the best way to advertise our events to you?

79%

77%

77%

65%

15%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Facebook

Flyers

Email

Big Signs

Personal Letter

Answ

er C

hoic

es

Percent

Page 17: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Institution 2 One focus group with 7 students

4 Sophomores 2 Juniors 1 Senior

4 women and 3 men

Page 18: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Institution 2 What was your freshman year like?

Unaware and uninvolved Involved and social

What was your sophomore year like? Social, stability, involved, academic

improvement Social and academic decline More personal responsibility Confidence

Page 19: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Institution 2 What are some issues that sophomores

face? Career choices, purpose, identity development Financial and personal responsibility Academic decline

What issues did you face that you did not expect? Uncertainty Abandoned Lacking ability

Page 20: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

We want to hear from YOU!

37607

Page 21: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Design your own SYE/Sophomore LLC

In your plan, consider these factors: Programmatic Initiatives

Faculty, campus resources/office, active vs. passive

Intentionality vs. Informal social programming Curricular options/SYE course options

Creating buy-in both by students and the institution Advertising, Marketing, Publicizing Connection to campus strategic planning

Budget/Funding Partnerships, collaborations, not “reinventing

the wheel”

Page 22: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Sharing what you learned What programmatic elements did you

include in your SYE/LLC? Why/how would sophomores benefit

from your new SYE/LLC? How does your SYE/LLC tie into your

institution type/mission?

Page 23: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Why does this matter for sophomores? Emphasis on First Year Experience

Just because they’re done with their 1st year doesn’t mean they are necessarily acclimated to the campus and expectations associated with the sophomore year

Sophomore Slump Influencing persistence & retention Impact on academic preparedness and success

Student engagement and involvement Getting sophomores involved and active on campus Keep them living on-campus & invested in their residential

experience Second Year as the Stepping Stone to Success

Getting students to think bigger picture Reflection to help guide their future pursuits (career, personal, etc.)

Page 24: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

“Learn MORE. Achieve MORE. sophoMORE.” at Institution 1

Primary Goal: Through education, connect sophomores to

the existing resources at the university Methods of Reaching Sophomores:

Targeted mailings Sophomore website Interactive sophoMORE workshops Engaging “Welcome Week” programs Sophomore Academic Success Workshops

Page 25: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Sophomore LLC at Institution 2 Living and Learning Communities (LLCs) Housing and Residential Education Maximum capacity of residential spaces

in 2010-2011 Looking to next year…

Page 26: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Creating a Campus Culture

Ensuring that many campus constituencies are included in planning & implementing: Student Success Center Career Center Study Abroad Housing/Residence Life Office of the Provost Graduate Student in Student Affairs program Academic Advising

Page 27: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Limitations of data collection One focus group at one institution More survey responses from both

institutions Incentives, more reminders, paper copies

Avoid all non-sophomore responses in surveys

View responses based on demographic group/classification to look for trends

Limited sample size due to access issues

Page 28: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

We want to hear from YOU!

37607

Page 29: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Reflection & Processing How can you apply this information back

at your institution?

Any general questions?

Page 30: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Resources Astin, A. W. (1993). What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. San

Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Finning-Kwoka, S.M., Clayton, J., & Newman, J. (2007, November). Evidenced-based sophomore year experience program development. Presented at the 14th Annual National Conference on Students in Transition.

Gohn, L., Swartz, J., & Donnelly, S. (2001). A case study of second year student persistence. Journal of College Student Retention, 2, 271-294.

Pattengale, J. & Schreiner, L. A. (2000). What is the sophomore slump and why should we care? In L. A. Schreiner & J. Pattengale (Eds.), Visible solutions for invisible students: Helping sophomores succeed (Monograph No. 31) (pp. vviii). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.

Page 31: A Purposeful & Integrative Approach to Engaging Sophomores

Thank you! Dan Stypa

[email protected] 813-974-1995

Jenna Schwartz [email protected] 813-974-5303