1
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group. THE LANCET • Vol 361 • February 22, 2003 • www.thelancet.com 705 CORRESPONDENCE 3 Honer WG, Smith GN, MacEwan GW, et al. Diagnostic reassessment and treatment response in schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 1994; 55: 528–32. 4 Haskett R. Diagnostic categorization of psychiatric disturbance in Cushing’s syndrome. Am J Psychiatry 1985; 142: 911–16. 5 Walkup JT, McAlpine DD, Olfson M, et al. Patients with schizophrenia at risk for excessive antipsychotic dosing. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61: 344–48. a disorder that would fulfil the DSM IV or ICD 10 criteria for schizophrenia if the organic cause is overlooked and could be easily misdiagnosed as schizophrenia. Before the patient came to our department, an experienced senior psychiatrist from another psychiatric hospital had diagnosed hebephrenic schizophrenia, given the schizophrenia- like psychopathological findings and the chronicity of the patient’s symptoms (>4 years). This colleague had overlooked the clinical signs of Cushing’s disease, paradoxically due to the outbursts of rage and the non- compliance of the patient otherwise indicative of Cushing’s disease. The persisting severe persecutory ideas and negative symptoms could not be explained by the diagnosis of delirium. These symptoms are unspecific and can occur in many other psychiatric disorders besides delirium and schizophrenia. Although we agree with Raj’s general cautioning of the use of neuroleptics in cases of organic psychosis, we strongly disagree with his labelling of its use in our case as “improper”. Our patient was treated with a low dose of flupentixol in an attempt to achieve symptomatic relief in a very difficult clinical situation. Neuroleptic treatment can lead to great symptomatic benefit and is definitely not contraindicated in organic psychoses. There is no question that the treatment of choice for an organic psychosis is treatment of the underlying medical condition. However, a treating psychiatrist must still find ways to improve the patient’s condition during the often lengthy diagnostic phase. In our case, the problem of non- compliance was severe and delayed diagnosis substantially. We presented this case to emphasise that even long-standing schizophrenia- like and negative symptoms can be caused by rare organic disorders and can respond promptly to the appropriate somatic treatment. *Jürgen Zielasek, Martin Lauer Deparment of Psychiatry, Julius-Maximilians- University, D-97080 Würzburg, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]) 1 Zielasek J, Bender G, Schlesinger S, et al. A woman who gained weight and became schizophrenic. Lancet 2002; 360: 1392. 2 WHO. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines, Geneva: World Health Organization, 1992. 3 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edn, text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000. 4 Beckmann H. Classification of endogenous psychoses and their differentiated etiology, 2. Revised and enl. edn. Wien: Springer; 1999. Sir—The new rules 1 for publishing letters in The Lancet are commendable for attempting to expedite publication of correspondence about recently- published articles, but the provision of only 2 weeks after publication of a manuscript for correspondence may be burdensome for some authors. For example, we received the Jan 4 issue of The Lancet—in which the new rules were printed—on Jan 10. Already, a week had passed before receiving the issue on which we are commenting. A week or two may seem like plenty of time to write a letter, but the demanding obligations of life can easily make this deadline daunting or unrealistic for some authors. Consider that one might have to go to the library or internet to research a topic before beginning correspondence. If collabo- rating with a colleague in another city, authors will have to fax or e-mail materials back and forth to one another. All the tasks associated with writing a letter must be accomplished in addition to clinical duties, teaching schedules, administrative obligations, family functions, and attempting to get a few hours of much-needed sleep. And it is assumed that one is not on vacation or at a conference within the 2-week period after an article’s publication. Old letters, new rules Sir—I am glad that I happened to peruse the online edition of The Lancet today, and so have an opportunity to reply to Zoë Mullan’s Commentary (Jan 4, p 12). 1 If I had waited for the paper version of the journal, I would not have been able to reply under the new 2-week rule. My paper version of The Lancet usually takes about 3 weeks to arrive by mail to this, not too remote, part of Canada. I suspect that many of your readers are like me in that they might briefly scan The Lancet online for the headlines each week, but prefer to read the paper version of the journal. Some of the more remote readers might have to wait as long as I for the paper version and might not have internet access. Are their voices now not to be heard? Did The Lancet review the time to delivery of the paper version before introducing these new rules? Michael O’Connor Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medicine Hat Regional Hospital, Medicine Hat, Alberta T1A 4H6, Canada (e-mail: [email protected]) 1 Mullan Z. Lancet Correspondence: old letters, new rules. Lancet 2003; 361: 12. Sir—Jürgen Zielasek and colleagues 1 report the case of a woman with Cushing’s syndrome and schizophrenia- like symptoms. In our experience of about 400 cases of Cushing’s syndrome of pituitary, adrenal, and ectopic origin, psychiatric disorders were not at all rare. The most frequent was depression, which was seen in 78 of 111 cases of adrenal hyperfunction. 2 In fulminant Cushing’s syndrome, manic disorders were more frequent. The risk of suicide is high in these patients owing to depression or schizophrenia-like symptoms, hallucinations, and illusions. In our group of patients, we saw attempted suicide by drug intoxication, hanging, 3 and venous incision. All psychiatric disorders improved after successful treatment of adrenal hyperfunction. To prevent suicide attempts, all patients with Cushing’s syndrome should be monitored carefully for the appearance of psychiatric disorders. *Anna A Kasperlik-Zaluska, Jadwiga Slowinska-Srzednicka, Wojciech Zgliczynski Department of Endocrinology, Centre for Postgraduate Medical Education, Ceglowska 80, 01-809 Warsaw, Poland (e-mail: [email protected]) 1 Zielasek J, Bender G, Schlesinger S, et al. A woman who gained weight and became schizophrenic. Lancet 2002; 360: 1392. 2 Kasperlik-Zaluska A, Hartwig W, Nielubowicz J, et al. Clinical analysis of 111 cases of adrenocortical hyperfunction: results of surgical treatment. Endokrynol Pol 1978; 29: 273–88. 3 Kasperlik-Zaluska A, Nielubowicz J, Migdalska B, et al. Association of adrenocortical hyperactivity with renal carcinoma. Nowotwory 1980; 30: 195–99. Authors’ reply Sir—Our patient showed several symptoms that fulfil the general diagnostic criteria of schizophrenia according to ICD 10 and DSM IV: formal thought disorder with breaks in the train of thought, persecutory ideas, social withdrawal, loss of interest, lack of initiative, and aimlessness. 1–3 However, we never diagnosed our patient as having an endogenous schizophrenic psychosis. 4 We diagnosed an organic schizophrenia-like disorder (ICD 10: F06.2), the term being used to describe

A woman who gained weight and became schizophrenic

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A woman who gained weight and became schizophrenic

For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group.THE LANCET • Vol 361 • February 22, 2003 • www.thelancet.com 705

CORRESPONDENCE

3 Honer WG, Smith GN, MacEwan GW, et al.Diagnostic reassessment and treatmentresponse in schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry1994; 55: 528–32.

4 Haskett R. Diagnostic categorization ofpsychiatric disturbance in Cushing’ssyndrome. Am J Psychiatry 1985; 142:911–16.

5 Walkup JT, McAlpine DD, Olfson M, et al.Patients with schizophrenia at risk forexcessive antipsychotic dosing. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61: 344–48.

a disorder that would fulfil the DSM IVor ICD 10 criteria for schizophrenia ifthe organic cause is overlooked andcould be easily misdiagnosed asschizophrenia.

Before the patient came to ourdepartment, an experienced seniorpsychiatrist from another psychiatrichospital had diagnosed hebephrenicschizophrenia, given the schizophrenia-like psychopathological findings and thechronicity of the patient’s symptoms (>4 years). This colleague hadoverlooked the clinical signs ofCushing’s disease, paradoxically due tothe outbursts of rage and the non-compliance of the patient otherwiseindicative of Cushing’s disease. Thepersisting severe persecutory ideas andnegative symptoms could not beexplained by the diagnosis of delirium.These symptoms are unspecific and canoccur in many other psychiatricdisorders besides delirium andschizophrenia.

Although we agree with Raj’s generalcautioning of the use of neuroleptics incases of organic psychosis, we stronglydisagree with his labelling of its use inour case as “improper”. Our patient wastreated with a low dose of flupentixol inan attempt to achieve symptomatic reliefin a very difficult clinical situation.Neuroleptic treatment can lead to greatsymptomatic benefit and is definitelynot contraindicated in organicpsychoses. There is no question that thetreatment of choice for an organicpsychosis is treatment of the underlyingmedical condition. However, a treatingpsychiatrist must still find ways toimprove the patient’s condition duringthe often lengthy diagnostic phase. Inour case, the problem of non-compliance was severe and delayeddiagnosis substantially.

We presented this case to emphasisethat even long-standing schizophrenia-like and negative symptoms can becaused by rare organic disorders and canrespond promptly to the appropriatesomatic treatment.*Jürgen Zielasek, Martin Lauer

Deparment of Psychiatry, Julius-Maximilians-University, D-97080 Würzburg, Germany(e-mail: [email protected])

1 Zielasek J, Bender G, Schlesinger S, et al. A woman who gained weight and becameschizophrenic. Lancet 2002; 360: 1392.

2 WHO. The ICD-10 Classification of Mentaland Behavioural Disorders: clinicaldescriptions and diagnostic guidelines,Geneva: World Health Organization, 1992.

3 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnosticand Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,fourth edn, text revision. Washington, DC:American Psychiatric Association, 2000.

4 Beckmann H. Classification of endogenouspsychoses and their differentiated etiology, 2.Revised and enl. edn. Wien: Springer; 1999.

Sir—The new rules1 for publishingletters in The Lancet are commendablefor attempting to expedite publicationof correspondence about recently-published articles, but the provision ofonly 2 weeks after publication of amanuscript for correspondence may beburdensome for some authors. For example, we received the Jan 4issue of The Lancet—in which the newrules were printed—on Jan 10.Already, a week had passed beforereceiving the issue on which we arecommenting.

A week or two may seem like plentyof time to write a letter, but thedemanding obligations of life can easilymake this deadline daunting orunrealistic for some authors. Considerthat one might have to go to the libraryor internet to research a topic beforebeginning correspondence. If collabo-rating with a colleague in another city,authors will have to fax or e-mailmaterials back and forth to oneanother. All the tasks associated withwriting a letter must be accomplishedin addition to clinical duties, teachingschedules, administrative obligations,family functions, and attempting to geta few hours of much-needed sleep.And it is assumed that one is not onvacation or at a conference within the2-week period after an article’spublication.

Old letters, new rules

Sir—I am glad that I happened to peruse the online edition of The Lancet today, and so have anopportunity to reply to Zoë Mullan’sCommentary (Jan 4, p 12).1 IfI had waited for the paper version ofthe journal, I would not have been ableto reply under the new 2-week rule.

My paper version of The Lancetusually takes about 3 weeks to arriveby mail to this, not too remote, part ofCanada. I suspect that many of yourreaders are like me in that they mightbriefly scan The Lancet online for theheadlines each week, but prefer toread the paper version of the journal.Some of the more remote readersmight have to wait as long as I for thepaper version and might not haveinternet access. Are their voices nownot to be heard? Did The Lancetreview the time to delivery of thepaper version before introducing thesenew rules?Michael O’ConnorDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, MedicineHat Regional Hospital, Medicine Hat, Alberta T1A 4H6, Canada(e-mail: [email protected])

1 Mullan Z. Lancet Correspondence: oldletters, new rules. Lancet 2003; 361: 12.

Sir—Jürgen Zielasek and colleagues1

report the case of a woman withCushing’s syndrome and schizophrenia-like symptoms. In our experience ofabout 400 cases of Cushing’s syndromeof pituitary, adrenal, and ectopic origin,psychiatric disorders were not at all rare.The most frequent was depression,which was seen in 78 of 111 cases ofadrenal hyperfunction.2 In fulminantCushing’s syndrome, manic disorderswere more frequent.

The risk of suicide is high in these patients owing to depression or schizophrenia-like symptoms,hallucinations, and illusions. In ourgroup of patients, we saw attemptedsuicide by drug intoxication, hanging,3

and venous incision. All psychiatricdisorders improved after successfultreatment of adrenal hyperfunction. Toprevent suicide attempts, all patientswith Cushing’s syndrome should bemonitored carefully for the appearanceof psychiatric disorders.*Anna A Kasperlik-Zaluska, Jadwiga Slowinska-Srzednicka, Wojciech ZgliczynskiDepartment of Endocrinology, Centre forPostgraduate Medical Education, Ceglowska 80,01-809 Warsaw, Poland(e-mail: [email protected])

1 Zielasek J, Bender G, Schlesinger S, et al. Awoman who gained weight and becameschizophrenic. Lancet 2002; 360: 1392.

2 Kasperlik-Zaluska A, Hartwig W,Nielubowicz J, et al. Clinical analysis of 111cases of adrenocortical hyperfunction: resultsof surgical treatment. Endokrynol Pol 1978;29: 273–88.

3 Kasperlik-Zaluska A, Nielubowicz J,Migdalska B, et al. Association ofadrenocortical hyperactivity with renalcarcinoma. Nowotwory 1980; 30: 195–99.

Authors’ reply

Sir—Our patient showed severalsymptoms that fulfil the generaldiagnostic criteria of schizophreniaaccording to ICD 10 and DSM IV:formal thought disorder with breaks inthe train of thought, persecutory ideas,social withdrawal, loss of interest, lack ofinitiative, and aimlessness.1–3 However,we never diagnosed our patient ashaving an endogenous schizophrenicpsychosis.4 We diagnosed an organicschizophrenia-like disorder (ICD 10:F06.2), the term being used to describe