Upload
otis-a6866
View
232
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 AAG Presention 58400 r2
1/13
PERMEABILITY CORRELATIONS FOR
CARBONATE & OTHER ROCKS
Otis P. Armstrong, PE
Paper #58400 GSA Meeting 2003 Seattle Wa.
Presentation rev. 3
8/3/2019 AAG Presention 58400 r2
2/13
The form: k (md) =101.5(1/Sw-c - 1)1.9
(if k calc > 200, use 1, not 10)
It is presented to improve description of
potentially productive zones of carbonates.
Equations that do not use the form:(1/Sw-c - 1) cannot accurately describe k at
both low & high Swc, .i.e. at Swc=1, k must
equal zero.
Following Graphs are comparisons:
8/3/2019 AAG Presention 58400 r2
3/13
0.0
0.1
1
.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
2.0 7.0 12.0 17.0 22.0 27.0 32.0
por %
kmd
opa BVW=0.02
Archie 1
Archie 2
Ar type 3
low por ss
Data
8/3/2019 AAG Presention 58400 r2
4/13
0.20.2
0.4
0.1
12.0
0.1
82.0
0.3
8.5
1.8
6.1
3.1
109.3
2.3
12.8
53.0
138.0
52.3
14.3
168.0
0.1
2.5
0.2
3.2
0.8
24.0
0.0
2.5
0.0
100.0
63.0
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E-02 1.E-01 1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03
core opa Sch97 Timur
Error w/ opa eqn is 10xs less than Sch97 and 20xs less Timur
Only 2 false negatives and 3 false positives at 1md cut point
8/3/2019 AAG Presention 58400 r2
5/13
Sw-c =BVW/ in Timors equation gives:Kmin ={92.6()
2.2/(Sw-c)}2 => min ={Kmin *BVW/92.6}0.313
and using these terms in the movable HC formula:
(Swc0.2
Swc)7760 = 7760{( Swc/)0.2
BVW}=BBL/AcFt = 7760{0.8(BVW)0.2 BVW} =>Kmin RULE : 7760[{Kmin /92.6}
0.25(BVW)0.513 BVW]
Other forms give similar results, but with limited range:Max Swc RULE: (BBL/AcFt)mo =7760(BVW)[(Swc)
-0.8 -1]min RULE : (BBL/AcFt)mo = 7760{[min
0.8 ]BVW0.2 BVW}
MOBILE HC VALUE
Provided, a min k can be established, mobile HC factor is simply a
mapping of the Bulk Volume Water Term, BVW. More correct K
forms, with (1/Swc - 1)n are just more complex. Below is a simple
derivation & recall (N^a)(N^-b)=N^(a-b) but ((N^a)^b)=N^(a*b):
8/3/2019 AAG Presention 58400 r2
6/13
Effect of permeability on min HC mov 0.025 BVW
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
275
300
325
350
375
400
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
min k, md
BBL/ac-
ftmove
opa
sch97
asquith oil
At each BVW, a MINIMUM mobility of BBL/AcFt is defined
using a parametric of Porosity or Connate Water or k.
8/3/2019 AAG Presention 58400 r2
7/13
63
0.23
0.2
0.4
0.1
12
0.05
82
0.3
9
1.8
63
1092
13
53
138
52
14
0.1
2.5
0.2
3.2
2
1
2
shale
??
?
?
?
??
?
?
>1>1
168
0.1
100
200
100
6
0.8
21
y = 1150x0.48
50
150
250
350
450
550
650
750
850
950
0.005 0.025 0.045 0.065 0.085 0.105 0.125 0.145BVW
b
bl/acft,mob
il
core & (md)
0.1md
Sw mx =0.525
0.3 mdPower (0.3 md)
Power (0.1md)
Plot of Core Data as BVW & Mobility Ratio: BBL/AcFt Minimum
Proposed at 0.2md line or 780BVW0.44
8/3/2019 AAG Presention 58400 r2
8/13
Increased mobility ~ increased chance depo is economical90% of all USA crb prdn from depo >130bbl/acft. US datashows: prospecting in low Siluran & older rocks; successrates 2-4xs higher if dolomites are tested compared to developing
simular age & limestone rocks.
8/3/2019 AAG Presention 58400 r2
9/13
2nd &Vug Carbs: =>bimodal pores
In logging terms: movable HC is:BBL/AcFt = 7760[a]*[(Rmf/Rxo) - (Rw/Rt) ]at irreducible H2O= 7760{ (Rw/aRt)}[ Swc)
-0.8 -1]Where a is term to make F = (a/2) , typically a=1 in carb.
Min bvw max bvw min bbl/AcFt mx bbl/AcFtvug carb 0.005 0.015 76 123
vug & IX carb 0.015 0.025 123 154
.Intr gran crb. 0.025 0.040 154 189
Chalk carb 0.050 0.100 189 283
780BVW0.44
8/3/2019 AAG Presention 58400 r2
10/13
Typical conditions, production < 900 & >130 bbl/ac-ft.Mobile HC expressed as BBL/Acft is a handy way to evaluatedeposit, provided lithology is understood
The closer values are to litho-minimums, the less the chancesof economic HC extractionLow mobility values also indicate low permeability, w/obimodal poresHigher values indicate higher effective porosity
Watch for chalk & silt porosity types as they have higher mins
Rocks with
8/3/2019 AAG Presention 58400 r2
11/13
movable HC
36 wells W. Latvia
bbl/acft bbl/acft200 235 max
94 131 avg60 90 std
36 nIX LS clean
Upper Ordovician Zone, Clean Carbonate, Western Latvia
Indication in 36 wells: this zone is a Cap Rock, typically
8/3/2019 AAG Presention 58400 r2
12/13
Well J-E6
Horner Analysis CompareDanish OPA/core
t, m 10 0.62
por % 11 17.4
k, md 2.5 40.5Horner gives md-m
Geol. Factors = thicknesscores show ~1m sucrosic LS
Indications are: oil flow is from thin lower sucrosic LS/Dolo
8/3/2019 AAG Presention 58400 r2
13/13
Thanks for hearing my considerations. A more detailed
Discussion is available by email request.