Upload
nikolay-borislavov-kitov
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 About Contemporary Astronomy and Cosmology
1/4
About contemporary Astronomy and Cosmology
In Modern Cosmology and Astronomy should be seen an upcoming crisis.
Crisis, caused by the rapid development of this scientific field.
According to theaporiaeofZeno of Elea,the more we expand the scope of our
knowledge, the more we enter into contact with the unknown. Distortion between
the known and the unknown is growing and according to the laws promoted byHegel,sooner or later the quantitative accumulations lead to qualitative changes.
On the other hand, according to the ancient philosophical teachings of theTaoism,
any phenomenon contains in itself the germ of his denial.
The field of knowledge, the subject of this article is no exception.
Research methods developed in the twentieth century from our new history,
led to a boom of knowledge, unknown in all of human history. Only results from optical
telescopeHubbleexceeded anything human imagination could have conceived before
1980. And optics is not a lone example of progress. Atomic, nuclear, and spectroscopic
methods. Seismic, gravitational methods.
The methods of radio waves, gamma rays, electron streams. And more and more ... All
those, coupled with high technology, computerization and the powerful
reactive technique led to the scientific results that will be contemplated
for generations.
And making sense of the results should be a priority task of the modern stage.
In this area there is a lot to be desired.
1. Gravitational energy of an astronomical body can be found in two ways:
First: By calculating the work to its disintegration and the relegation of his small
enough fragments in the infinity of space, where the interaction between
them is negligible.
Second: By integrating the pressure field inside the body throughout its volume.
The results obtained by the two methods should be the same. But is it now upon
us?! No! Results differ noticeably the result found by the second method is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aporiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aporiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aporiahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeno_of_Eleahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeno_of_Eleahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeno_of_Eleahttp://www.iep.utm.edu/hegelsoc/http://www.iep.utm.edu/hegelsoc/http://www.iep.utm.edu/hegelsoc/http://www.tao.org/http://www.tao.org/http://www.tao.org/http://hubblesite.org/http://hubblesite.org/http://hubblesite.org/http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-z5JU85__mZA/VFoNG4VduYI/AAAAAAAABhc/hl1LTIMCS24/s1600/Tao3.jpghttp://hubblesite.org/http://www.tao.org/http://www.iep.utm.edu/hegelsoc/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeno_of_Eleahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aporia8/10/2019 About Contemporary Astronomy and Cosmology
2/4
exactly 4 times smaller than the result obtained in the first method.
This difference of of all is a huge field for speculation.
This difference should be named dark, black, invisible, obscure, and so
on
In fact, this energy is only unexplored by us.
If the difference was in the first percents, we threw the responsibility on the
methods.But with such big difference, we should look for the reason in the initial data.
It is normal to assume that the pressure values, used by the second method are
inaccurate.
2. The law of conservation of energy is the groundwork of physics.
Attempts at explanations of the phenomena without him or around him
are very risky.
3. Both planets and stars are supposed to have layered structure.
For theEarthand theMoonthat is proven byseismic.
This structure is attributed to gravitational or chemical separation.
It is assumed that the Earth's core is iron. Just because seismic gives us the
densities typical for the iron at the Earth's surface.
But it is correct to suppose the compacting of the substance due to the high
pressures. Pressures higher than those which we calculate in our models.
They have to be higher due to the circumstances set out above.
Experimental data allow us to assume separation by phases.
Obviously solid and gaseous phases of matter of the planets are divided.
If well look at our home, well note the separation of the liquid from the other
phases. Well note also Ionic separation.
But only at this point.
Within the framework of the solid phase, phenomena are so complex that the
gravitational separation simply could not be found.
4. It is accepted that the stars are considered as gas complexes. Often with theion sheath due to high temperatures.
Such a glance is permissible due to the data from spectral analysis, giving a
huge advantage to the lines of lighter gases.
But it raises a number of inconsistencies.
For a start, such an approach could not explain the formation of stars.
It is not possible condensation of gases in the solid body due to the forces of
repulsion between ions and molecules of gases.
The gas clouds may not bring in enough tight compound to permit processes
emitting such powerful emissions as observed.And all our observations show the expansion of the gas clouds, not shrinking.
http://www.learner.org/interactives/dynamicearth/structure.htmlhttp://www.learner.org/interactives/dynamicearth/structure.htmlhttp://www.learner.org/interactives/dynamicearth/structure.htmlhttp://planetfacts.org/layers-of-the-moon/http://planetfacts.org/layers-of-the-moon/http://planetfacts.org/layers-of-the-moon/http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/High_School_Earth_Science/Inside_Earthhttp://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/High_School_Earth_Science/Inside_Earthhttp://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/High_School_Earth_Science/Inside_Earthhttp://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/High_School_Earth_Science/Inside_Earthhttp://planetfacts.org/layers-of-the-moon/http://www.learner.org/interactives/dynamicearth/structure.html8/10/2019 About Contemporary Astronomy and Cosmology
3/4
Help comes with the idea of powder-gas complexes. But it's not helping enough.
Powder component may condense. But to overcome the forces of repulsion of
the gases and make enough dense veil around the hard core, this core must to
be big enough, with enough strong intensity of the gravitational field. In other
words, the powder component in the fetus must be substantial.
This leads us to conclusion that the hard core of the stars are big enough, andthus posses determining role for the energy sources, evolution and structures
of the stars.
Should reflect on the option, nuclear and thermonuclear phenomena observed
on the surface of stars to represent the processes of re-emission of energy,
released from the core of the stars due to other causes and processes.
5. The large difference between the average densities of planets and stars and their
surface densities leads to construction of a laminar models. These models are
acceptable by analogy with the Earth and the Moon, for which are proven.
But for the stars, the patterns lead to densities in the centers above 150 grams
in cubic centimeter! Astonishing and unacceptable value for gas complexes.
In the observed temperatures and chemical composition such densities long
ago would have caused explosions. We with you would not have been alive and
constituent of our bodies. And would be fly in space in the form of molecules,
radicals, ions and atoms. And they would be blistering, in the form of cold
radiations.
6. The Universe is expanding. Galaxies are expanding. Clusters are expanding.
The stars are expanding. And our planet is expanding, too.
It seems, the expansion is a universal law.
Why? What causes it? And what is the mechanism?!
Should reflect on the likelihood of processes in stars which lead to passage
of the solid phase into a gas phase.
Thus the ratio between the centripetal force and centrifugal force is changingin favor of the latter and consequently the body comes to the expansion.
Powerfully stimulated by the military preparations, Nuclear and Atomic Physics
got unparalleled prosperity. Those areas of physics eclipsed all other areas of
human knowledge. It is naturally, the prestige of this progress to put their marks
on astronomy and cosmology.
Today all phenomena in the Universe are seen through the prism of nuclear
physics. Without a doubt, this filter helped to achieve very much. But does not
get carried away. According to Tao, the powerful accelerator is to the samedegree limiter. In particular, construction, energy, and evolution of the stars are
seen through the filter of nuclear and thermonuclear processes.
This approach has led to theories of neutrino, dark energy, dark matter and
8/10/2019 About Contemporary Astronomy and Cosmology
4/4
attempts to revise the Law of Conservation of Energy.
After the big wave of progress, we are at the edge to enter into the swamp of the
dark times.
I suggest a dark forces, dark energy, black matter to be left to the Vatican. In this
area the Holy Father and the Conclave outnumber us.
We have gravitational forces, electric forces, nuclear forces.And our explanations should be looking at the context of this toolkit.
It is good time to turn to gravity, with the hope of a new approach to clear and
simply our present understandings.