25
Accountability Subreport on the Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise UC Research Enterprise Accountability Subreport on the Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise UC Research Enterprise Steven Beckwith Steven Beckwith VP for Research & Graduate Studies VP for Research & Graduate Studies o esea c & G aduate Stud es o esea c & G aduate Stud es

Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

Accountability Subreport on the Accountability Subreport on the UC Research EnterpriseUC Research Enterprise

Accountability Subreport on the Accountability Subreport on the UC Research EnterpriseUC Research Enterprise

Steven Beckwith Steven Beckwith VP for Research & Graduate StudiesVP for Research & Graduate Studieso esea c & G aduate Stud eso esea c & G aduate Stud es

Page 2: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

UC’s Recent Research StatureUC’s Recent Research Stature

2009 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine

2009 Nobel Prize in Economicsy gy

Elizabeth Blackburn, UCSF"for the discovery of how chromosomes are

Oliver E. Williamson, UC Berkeley"for his analysis of economic governance especially thechromosomes are

protected by telomeres and the enzyme telomerase”

governance, especially the boundaries of the firm"

Also in 2009• 16 new members of the National Academy of Sciences• 3 new members of the National Academy of Engineering3 new members of the National Academy of Engineering• 6 new members of the National Academies Institute of Medicine• 2 MacArthur Fellows

More Nobel Laureates than any other University System

More National Academy Members than any other University System

Page 3: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

Size and Scope of UC Research Enterprise

Size and Scope of UC Research EnterpriseResearch EnterpriseResearch Enterprise

Total System-wide Expenditures• Research distinguishes the

University of California among California public institutions of higher

3% 3% 2%

Total System wide Expenditures for FY2008-09 ($20B)

Medical Centers

Instructioninstitutions of higher education

• Research opportunities are the most important factors in

25%

5%

5%3%

Research

Academic Support

Student Financial Aid

$5.2B in research expenditures, ~25% of UC budget$5.2B in research expenditures, ~25% of UC budget$3.9B Direct, $0.7B Indirect costs recovered $3.9B Direct, $0.7B Indirect costs recovered $0 3B i b d (l t ) $0 3B ICR i d$0 3B i b d (l t ) $0 3B ICR i d

$

precruiting star faculty, postdocs & grad students to UC

21%

8%

6% Institutional Support

Auxiliary Enterprises

DOE Lab Management

$0.3B unreimbursed (low rates), $0.3B ICR waived$0.3B unreimbursed (low rates), $0.3B ICR waived1400 inventions/yr; ~$120M/yr income1400 inventions/yr; ~$120M/yr incomeFor every $100M in extramural funds: ~$5M isFor every $100M in extramural funds: ~$5M is$3.9B • Research quality is one of

the most important factors for top ratings in relative comparisons among

21%

19%

gStudent Services

Operation and Maint of PlantPublic Service

For every $100M in extramural funds: ~$5M is For every $100M in extramural funds: ~$5M is industry sponsored, ~$2.5M is income from inventionsindustry sponsored, ~$2.5M is income from inventions

comparisons among universities

Source: Institutional Research, Current Fund Expenditures by Function and Fund Source Location

Page 4: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

Supporting Indirect Research Costs

Supporting Indirect Research CostsCostsCosts

CampusProposed IDC Rate

(2010)

Negotiated IDC Rate

(2010)Difference

“In a recent year, Harvard University said that indirect

t b t 73 t f

MIT 68% 68% 0

Harvard 76.9% 68% -8.9

Stanford 65.8% 58% -7.8costs ran about 73 cents for every dollar of direct costs, but it actually recovered 67 cents, using a rate set by the National

Yale 72% 65.5% -6.5

Illinois 59.8% 58.5% -1.3

SUNY - Buffalo 69.5% 58.5% -11

Mi hi 62 7% 54 5% 8 2 using a rate set by the National Institutes of Health. That means that Harvard had to supply 6 cents of its own money for

Michigan 62.7% 54.5% -8.2

UC Berkeley 70.1% 53.5% -16.6

UC Davis 71.2% 52% -19.2

UC Irvine 56 6% 53% 3 3 yevery dollar it received.”

UC Irvine 56.6% 53% -3.3

UCLA 62.3% 54% -8.3

UCSF 62.4% 54.5% -7.9

Page 5: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

Research Expenditure Comparison

Research Expenditure Comparison

R&D Expenditures per Senate or Equivalent Faculty Member

ComparisonComparison

Non Medical School Campuses Medical School Campuses

$1,000

$1,200 Non Medical School Campuses Medical School Campuses

$600

$800

Thou

sand

s

$200

$400

T

$-

Private Comp Public Comp UC

Source: NSF R&D Survey, IPEDS Fall Staff Surveys, Fall 2007 (private) and Fall 2008 (public)

Page 6: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

Research Expenditure Comparison

Research Expenditure ComparisonComparisonComparison

0.2Total R&D Expenditures, Annual Growth, 1996-97 to 2007-08

0 1

0

0.1

0 1

096/97 -97/98

97/98 -98/99

98/99 -99/00

99/00 -00/01

00/01 -01/02

01/02 -02/03

02/03 -03/04

03/04-04/05

04/05 -05/06

05/06-06/07

06/07-07/08

-0.1

Source: Institutional Research, NSF R&D Survey

-0.2

UC Total All Other Academic Institutions except UC

Page 7: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

Total Research Publications per Faculty Member CY2008

Total Research Publications per Faculty Member CY2008

12.0

Total Publications per Faculty Member

Faculty Member, CY2008Faculty Member, CY2008

Non Medical School Campuses Medical School Campuses

8.0

10.0

4 0

6.0

0 0

2.0

4.0

0.0

Source: Scopus: multi-disciplinary abstract and citation database and IPEDS Fall Staff Surveys, Fall 2007 (private) and Fall 2008 (public)

Private Comp Public Comp UC

Page 8: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

Shanghai Jiao Tong University 2009 Academic Ranking of World Universities

Shanghai Jiao Tong University 2009 Academic Ranking of World Universities

World Rank2009

InstitutionRelative Rank by         

$/facultyRelative Rank by   

Pub/faculty

gg

1 Harvard University2 Stanford University3 University of California, Berkeley5 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

9381

34105

6 California Institute of Technology7 Columbia University13 University of California, Los Angeles14 University of California, San Diego

211105

12109

16 University of Washington17 University of Wisconsin ‐Madison

18 University of California, San Francisco22 University of Michigan ‐ Ann Arbor

67

413

617

613

25 University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign28 University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

35 University of California, Santa Barbara46 University of California, Irvine

1814

1716

819

121346 University of California, Irvine

49 University of California, Davis

101‐151 University of California, Riverside

101‐151 University of California, Santa Cruz

161219

15

131317

17

Page 9: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

Measuring the OutliersMeasuring the Outliers

Criteria Indicator Weight

Quality of Education

Alumni of an institution winning Nobel Prizes and Fields Medals

10%

Staff of an institution i i N b l P i 20%

Quality of Faculty

winning Nobel Prizes and Fields Medals

20%

Highly cited researchers in 21 broad subject categories

20%categories

Research Output

Papers published in Nature and Science 20%

Papers indexed in Output Science Citation Index-expanded and Social Science Citation Index

20%

Per Capita Per capita academic performance of an 10%Performance performance of an institution

10%

Total 100%

Page 10: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

Shanghai Jiao Tong University 2009 Academic Ranking of World Universities

Shanghai Jiao Tong University 2009 Academic Ranking of World Universitiesgg

Institution’s World Rank2009

1 Harvard University

Institution’s World Rank2004

1 Harvard University 1 Harvard University2 Stanford University3 University of California, Berkeley4 University of Cambridge 5 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

1 Harvard University2 Stanford University3 University of Cambridge 4 University of California, Berkeley5 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) gy ( )

6 California Institute of Technology7 Columbia University13 University of California, Los Angeles14 University of California, San Diego

gy ( )6 California Institute of Technology9 Columbia University13 University of California, San Diego16 University of California, Los Angeles

16 University of Washington17 University of Wisconsin ‐Madison18 University of California, San Francisco22 University of Michigan ‐ Ann Arbor

17 University of California, San Francisco18 University of Wisconsin ‐Madison19 University of Michigan ‐ Ann Arbor20 University of Washington

25 University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign28 University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

35 University of California, Santa Barbara46 University of California, Irvine

25 University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign33 University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

35 University of California, Santa Barbara42 University of California, Davis

49 University of California, Davis101‐151 University of California, Riverside

101‐151 University of California, Santa Cruz

y ,55 University of California, Irvine

101‐151 University of California, Riverside

101‐151 University of California, Santa Cruz

Page 11: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

Technology Licenses at UCTechnology Licenses at UC

30,0002,500Active Licenses and Options

20 000

25,000

,

2,000

,

15,000

20,000

1 000

1,500

5,000

10,000

500

1,000

00FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09

UC Active Licenses/Options (fiscal year end)

Source: Innovation Alliances and Services, 2009 Annual Report ; AUTM Annual Survey

UC Active Licenses/Options (fiscal year-end)Total U.S. Active Licenses/Options (fiscal year-end)

Page 12: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

Technology Licenses at UCTechnology Licenses at UC

$3,000$120

Income from Royalties & Fees

$2,500

$ ,

$100

$

$1,500

$2,000

$60

$80

nsMill

ions

$500

$1,000

$20

$40 Mill

ioM

$0

$

$0

$

FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09UC Income from Royalties & Fees (less legal settlements)Total U.S. University Income from Royalties and Fees

Source: Innovation Alliances and Services, 2009 Annual Report ; AUTM Annual Survey

Page 13: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

Research Sponsorship and New Ventures

Research Sponsorship and New VenturesNew VenturesNew Ventures

Industry Sponsored Research A d t UC

UC Technology-based Startup C i

$3.0

$3.5

$400$450$500

Awards at UC

500

600

404550

Companies

$1.5

$2.0

$2.5

$200$250$300$350

Bill

ions

Mill

ions

300

400

20253035

$0.0

$0.5

$1.0

$0$50

$100$150$

0

100

200

05

1015

$0.0$0

UC Industry Funding

00

New UC StartupsUC Industry FundingTotal Industry Funding for US Universities

Source: NSF R&D Survey; Institutional Research, Industry Sponsors Of Research, FY2005-2009 and Innovation Alliances and Services, 2009 Annual Report

New UC StartupsTotal U.S. Startups reported to AUTM

Page 14: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

Training CA’s InnovatorsTraining CA’s Innovators

900

Doctoral Degrees Granted 2008

Non Medical School Campuses Medical School Campuses

500600700800900

es A

war

ded

p

200300400500

tora

l Deg

ree

0100

Doc

t

Phys Sci & Engineering Social Sciences and Humanities Life Sci Education Business

Source: Institutional Research, Source: IPEDS 2008 Completions Survey. Includes all doctoral degrees except professional practice doctorates (J.D., M.D., etc.)

Phys Sci & Engineering Social Sciences and Humanities Life Sci Education Business

Page 15: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

UC Researchers Creating New Sciences Jay Keasling

UC Researchers Creating New Sciences Jay KeaslingSciences – Jay KeaslingSciences – Jay Keasling

• Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering

“Jay Keasling [is] creating a new discipline, synthetic“Jay Keasling [is] creating a new discipline, synthetic“Jay Keasling [is] creating a new discipline, synthetic

Engineering and Bioengineering• Director, Physical Biosciences Division,

LBL and Synthetic Biology Engineering Research Center new discipline, synthetic

biology, which—by combining elements of engineering, chemistry, computer science, and

l l bi l k t

new discipline, synthetic biology, which—by combining elements of engineering, chemistry, computer science, and

l l bi l k t

new discipline, synthetic biology, which—by combining elements of engineering, chemistry, computer science, and

l l bi l k t

• CEO, Joint BioEnergy Institute

molecular biology—seeks to assemble the biological tools necessary to redesign the living world.” –September 28, 2009

molecular biology—seeks to assemble the biological tools necessary to redesign the living world.” –September 28, 2009

molecular biology—seeks to assemble the biological tools necessary to redesign the living world.” –September 28, 2009

Page 16: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

UC Researchers Using Digital Humanities to Preserve Culture – Patricia Fumerton

UC Researchers Using Digital Humanities to Preserve Culture – Patricia Fumertonto Preserve Culture – Patricia Fumertonto Preserve Culture – Patricia Fumerton

• Professor of English, UC Santa Barbara• Founding Director UCSB Early Modern CenterFounding Director, UCSB Early Modern Center

and English Broadside Ballad Archive• National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH)

and Guggenheim Fellow• 2009 Digital Eighteenth Century Prize, British

Society for Eighteenth Century Studies

The English BroadsideThe English Broadside

Ballad Archive is making

17th century broadside

ballads accessible as texts, art, music, and cultural records of the

period. The ballads document the period when the modern world

d ti f i l d liti l t iti Thi j t h lemerged, a time of social and political transition. This project helps

us to understand the revolution in media and information

technology in contemporary culture.

Page 17: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

UC Researchers Influencing National Policy Daniel Sperling

UC Researchers Influencing National Policy Daniel SperlingNational Policy – Daniel SperlingNational Policy – Daniel Sperling

• Professor of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science and Policyy

• Founding Director of the Institute of Transportation Studies at the UC Davis

• Acting Director of the UC Davis Energy Efficiency CenterCenter

Dr. Sperling is recognized as a leading international expert on transportation technology assessment, energy and environmental aspects of transportation, and transportation policy.

Page 18: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

UC Researchers Making Discoveries Andrea Ghez

UC Researchers Making Discoveries Andrea GhezDiscoveries – Andrea GhezDiscoveries – Andrea Ghez

Ghez uses novel, ground-based telescopic techniquesGhez uses novel, ground based telescopic techniques

to identify thousands of new star systems and illuminate

the role of supermassive black holes in the evolution of

galaxies.

• Professor of Physics & Astronomy, UCLA• 2008 MacArthur Fellow• Member, National Academy of Sciences• 1996 Packard Fellow• 1996 Sloan Fellow• 1994 NSF Young Investigator

Page 19: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

Supplemental SlidesSupplemental Slidespppp

Page 20: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

Graduate Student RecruitmentGraduate Student RecruitmentPercent of Admitted Graduate Students Choosing UC over

a Non-UC Institution, 2007

50%

60%

70%

Non UC Institutions Most Frequently Cited

30%

40%

50% Non-UC Institutions Most Frequently Cited, 2007

Stanford UniversityMassachusetts Institute of Technology

10%

20%

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Harvard University

University of WashingtonUniversity of Michigan

0% University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Texas at Austin

Columbia UniversityCornell University

Source: Student Affairs, Graduate Student Support Survey; Trends in the Comparability of Graduate Student Stipends 2004 and 2007

Cornell UniversityUniversity of Chicago

Page 21: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

UC Research PublicationsBy Broad Discipline CY2008

UC Research PublicationsBy Broad Discipline CY2008By Broad Discipline, CY2008By Broad Discipline, CY2008

6,000

4,000

5,000 Health Sciences

2,000

3,000 Life Sciences

Physical

1,000

ySciences

Social Sciences & - Humanities

Source: Scopus: multi-disciplinary abstract and citation database

Page 22: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

UC Research PublicationsUC Research PublicationsPublications by Campus

Source: Scopus

35,000

40,000

45,000

UCM36,06038,942 40,065 40,924

25,000

30,000UCSCUCRUCSBUCI

29,985

10,000

15,000

20,000UCIUCSFUCDUCSDUCB

0

5,000

CY2004 CY2005 CY2006 CY2007 CY2008

UCBUCLA

CY2004 CY2005 CY2006 CY2007 CY2008

Source: Scopus: multi-disciplinary abstract and citation database

Page 23: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

UC & Comparator Institutions ARRA Awards Captured

UC & Comparator Institutions ARRA Awards Captured

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act AwardsNovember 2009

ARRA Awards Captured November 2009

ARRA Awards Captured November 2009

$140$160$180$200

ons

November 2009Non Medical School Campuses Medical School Campuses

$60$80

$100$120$140

Mill

i

$0$20$40$60

NSF NIH DOE

Source: Research Policy Analysis and Coordination, Federal Agency-reported data.

Page 24: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

Research ExpendituresResearch Expenditures

Direct Research Expenditures As a Percent of Total Operating Expenditures

35%40%45%50%

pNon Medical School Campuses Medical School Campuses

20%25%30%35%

0%5%

10%15%

0%

Source: Institutional Research, NSF R&D Survey

Page 25: Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterpriseregents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/jan10/l1attach.pdf · Accountability Subreport on the UC Research Enterprise Steven

UC R&D Expenditures FY2007 8

UC R&D Expenditures FY2007 8

$600

Federal Research Expenditures by Funding Agency

FY2007-8FY2007-8

$900Total Research Expenditures

$400

$500

$600

$

$600

$700

$800

$200

$300

lions

$200

$300

$400

$500

ons

$0

$100

eles sco

ego

avis

vine

eley ara

ruz

side ced

Mill

$0

$100

$200

eles sco

ego

avis

vine

eley ara

ruz

side ced

Mill

io

Los

Ang

e

San

Fra

ncis

San

Die Da Irv

Ber

ke

San

ta B

arb

San

ta C

Riv

ers

Mer

c

Los

Ang

e

San

Fra

ncis

San

Die Da

Irv

Ber

ke

San

ta B

arba

San

ta C

Riv

ers

Mer

c

Medical School  Non‐Medical School Medical School Non‐Medical School

HHS NSF DOD USDA DOE NASA OtherTotal Federal NON-FederalCampuses Campuses

Medical School Campuses

Non Medical SchoolCampuses

Source: Institutional Research, Research Expenditures (Direct and Indirect) by Campus