AISD Facility Master Plan presentation

8/8/2019 AISD Facility Master Plan presentation

1/21

Community Dialogue #2 - RESULTS

EXHIBIT A


2/21

Monitor the process Review, confirm & resolve recommendations

Prepare information Review & analyze input Develop & recommend Educational

Framework Develop options based on input Develop & recommend the final Facility

Master Plan

October 2010 Community Dialogue #2 2


3/21

Community Dialogues #1 results developeddraft of Educational Framework

High level draft options for communityfeedback through Dialogues #2

Options addressed:

Capacity Additions and consolidation/closure

Repurposing



4/21

Austin ISD Facility Master Plan



5/21


Planning Area Individual Web

Planning Area #1 126 407




Planning Area #5 97 369Planning Area #6 147 340

722 1461

AISD CD#2 Questionnaire Totals


6/21

Mostly female Ages 30-64

Majority white, non-Hispanic in areas 1,2,5,6 Majority Hispanic in areas 3,4 30% employed in education

College graduate Resident Parent



7/21October 2010

Encompassesthe schools

geographicallylocated within

Bowie HS andAkins HS

attendanceboundaries

Community Dialogue #2 7


8/21

Planning Area #1 Summary of

Options Feedback

Options Level of Support

1. Build one elementary school Strong Support

2. Build two elementary schools Support

3. Develop 9th grade center Did Not Support

4. No change Did Not Support

Planning Area 1: Akins and Bowie high schools; Bailey, Gorzycki, Mendez, andParedes middle schools; Baldwin, Baranoff, Blazier, Casey, Clayton, Cowan,Kiker, Kocurek, Langford, Menchaca, Mills, Palm, Perez, and Widen elementaryschools.



9/21October 2010



Crockett HSand Travis HS




10/21


Options Feedback


1. Close 1 Elementary West of IH-35 Did Not Support

2. Build 1 Elementary East of IH-35 Strong Support

3. Add Programs at Secondary

Schools

Very Strong Support

4. No change Did Not Support

Planning Area 2: Crockett and Travis high schools; Ann Richards School YWL,Bedichek, Covington, and Fulmore middle schools; Becker, Boone,Cunningham, Dawson, Galindo, Houston, Joslin, Linder, Odom, Pleasant Hill,Rodriguez, St. Elmo, Sunset Valley, Travis Heights, and Williams elementary

schools.



11/21October 2010



EMHSJCattendance

boundary



12/21


Options Feedback


1. Close 2 Elementary Schools Did Not Support

2. Close 1 Elementary School Did Not Support

3. Relocate Alternative School Strong Support

4. No Change Inconclusive

Planning Area 3: Ridgeview ALC; Eastside Memorial High Schools (Global, GreenTech, and International); Kealing and Martin middle schools; Allan, Allison,Blackshear, Brooke, Govalle, Metz, Oak Springs, Ortega, and Zavala elementaryschools.



13/21October 2010



Reagan HSand LBJ HS




14/21


Options Feedback


1. Close 1 Middle School Inconclusive

2. Add Signature Programs at

High School

Strong Support

3. No Change Did Not Support

Planning Area 4: Clifton Center; LBJ, LASA, and Reagan high schools;Dobie, Garcia, and Pearce middle schools; Andrews, Blanton, Graham,Harris, Hart, Jordan, Norman, Overton, Pecan Springs, Pickle, Sims,and Winn elementary schools.



15/21October 2010



Austin HS andMcCallum HS




16/21


Options Feedback


1. Limit Transfers Strong Support

2. Enlarge Small Schools Strong Support

3. Consolidate 2-3 Elementary Schools

into New Elementary School

Did Not Support

4. No Change Inconclusive

Planning Area 5: Rosedale School; Austin, Garza Independence, andMcCallum high schools; Lamar, O.Henry, Small, and Webb middle schools;Barton Hills, Brentwood, Bryker Woods, Campbell, Casis, Gullet, HighlandPark, Lee, Maplewood, Mathews, Oak Hill, Patton, Pease, Reilly, Ridgetop,

Sanchez, and Zilker elementary schools; Lucy Read Pre-K School.



17/21

October 2010



Anderson HSand Lanier HS




18/21


Options Feedback

Options Level of Support1. Build 1 New Elementary

School

Inconclusive

2. Construct Additions Very Strong Support

3. No Change Do Not Support

Planning Area 6: Anderson, International, and Lanier high schools; Burnet andMurchison middle schools; Barrington, Brown, Cook, Davis, Doss, Hill, McBee,Pillow, Summitt, Walnut Creek, Wooldridge, and Wooten elementary schools.



19/21

Participants supported the realignment of boundariesbefore considering consolidation and closure options

The criteria that were identified by participants as most

important for consideration shouldconsolidation/closure be considered were: utilization,facility condition and school performance.

There was general support for the addition of a gender

specific school for young men. Results were inconclusive about the need to enhance

the availability of athletic programs and facilitiesdistrictwide.

19November 3, 2010


20/21

There was support, in the event of the closure of aschool facility, for the following alternate uses:

Renovate for a different type of educational use

Reconfigure for use as administrative or district support space

Sell or lease the property

Use in partnership for community use

There was not support for razing or demolishingexisting buildings.

There were a variety of additional options proposed byparticipants that have been communicated to the taskforce.

20November 3, 2010


21/21

Receive status of signature program development andother programmatic initiatives.

Review and decide upon recommendations criteria and

preliminary recommendations in the areas of: Facility utilization (i.e., program adjustments, boundary adjustments,

consolidation/closures, and portable reduction targets)

Facility conditions (i.e., priority deficiencies, comprehensive

renovations, replacement or reuse, additions, new schools and life-

cycle renewal)

Vertical alignment of programs/feeder patterns by high school vertical

team

Hold Community Dialogues #3 on December 7th and 8th

21November 3 2010

Documents

AISD Facility Master Plan presentation