Upload
others
View
41
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Clinical Resolution and CSF Viral Suppression Following Switching to a Genotype-guided South African Antiretroviral Third Line Regimen with Good CSF Penetration
Cerebrospinal Fluid HIV Viral EscapeKabengele Kayembe D.; Nxele N.P.; Famoroti T.; Gordon M.
# livesmatter
Brain
Individual and programmatic impact and management implications
Clinical and virologic
ObjectiveEscapeCerebrospinal fluidNeuro-symptomatic
outcomes
Figure 1. Geographic distribution of cohorts presented at the Global HIV-1 CSF Escape Meeting 2016
HIV infected ART experiencedSouth Africa1in 5
UNAIDS Data 2017 | Journal of Virus Eradication 2016; 2: 243–250 | J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017;75:246–255
Uncommon or unrecognized or under reported
�����
The prevalence of CSF viral escape estimated at 4%‒20%among ART-experienced HIV+ adults
Deep rural Zulu Kingdom | KwaZulu-Natal province | South Africa
The setting
EshoweDistrict hospital
ClinicalSuspicion“With a high suspicion, every effort to obtain these assessments should be made
since they are essentialfor diagnosis and rational management.”
at the onset of new or progress of CNS symptoms
Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 50:773–8 | AIDS. 2012 September 10; 26(14) | J Neurovirol . 2013 August ; 19(4): 402–405 | AIDS. 2016;30(7):1143–1144 | Curr HIV/AIDS Rep (2015) 12:280–288 | Clin Infect Dis 2017;64(8):1059–65 | J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017;75:246–255) | AIDS 2016, Vol 30 No 7:1143-1144 | AIDS. 2012 September 10; 26(14)
EscapeCerebrospinal fluidNeuro-symptomatic
EscapeCerebrospinal fluidNeuro-symptomatic
Plasma/CSF viral loads Genotyping
Magnetic resonance imaging
September 2016 October 2016*December 2016
January 2017
*October 2016 plasma genotyping not reported (viral load 386 copies/mL)
HIV infection diagnosis in February 2010 Baseline CD4 cell count (%) of 264 cells/µL (6%) and viremia of 156,162 copies/mL (cpm) (5.20 Log)
Shift worker process control officer at a pulp and containerboard mill since 1987Married (spouse optimally suppressed on NNRTI based ART) and father to six children
The patient55-year-old male
0.01.02.03.04.05.06.0
01.534.567.59
10.51213.515
Feb-10Jun-10
Dec-10Jan-11Jun-11
Dec-11Jun-12
Aug-12
Nov-12Apr-13Oct-13Apr-14Sep-14Jul-15Oct-15Jun-16Jul-16
Sep-16
Dec-16Jan-17Apr-17
Viral load Log
CD4 percentage
% CD4 p-Log VL
Suboptimal and labile
Mar-2010* Jul-2015** Oct-2015⋊ Apr-2016∅ Jun-2016⋕
D4T, 3TC, NVP
TDF, FTC, ATV/r
TDF, FTC, LPV/r
TDF, FTC, ATV/r
TDF, FTC, LPV/r
Initiation SwitchART
regimenexposure
Intermittent
Severe
adherence
immune suppression
viral suppression
History of HIV care
Figure 2. Viremia & immune suppression levels
Figure 3. Antiretroviral therapy regimens
History of HIV care
Ritonavir boosted protease Inhibitorbased antiretroviraltherapymonths14
“Established” neurologic impairment
despite
improvementviremia control
Worsening
unremarkable brain computed tomography
Spectrum & severity fluctuated with viremia
Tremors & UnsteadinessProgressive
Insidious onset
“Established” neurologic impairmentCulminated with status epilepticus
Incapacitation
Semi-consciousness
Total dependenceNeurogenic dysphagia
WorseningTremors & Unsteadiness
ProgressiveInsidious onset
4.0
4.4
2.3
3.4
1.7
1
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
Sep-16
Dec-16
Discordance Plasma CSF
EscapeCerebrospinal fluidDefinition criteria
*AIDS. 2012 September 10; 26(14) | *Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 50:773–8 | **Curr HIV/AIDS Rep (2015) 12:280–288 | ***J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017;75:246–255) | ***J Infect 2012;65(3):239–245 | ***J. Neurovirol. (2016) 22:852–860
Cerebrospinal fluid HIV-1 RNA higher than paired plasma levels
>0.5 Log*** >2 times**≥1 Log*
Figure 5. CSF/Plasma dissociationFigure 4. CSF escape criteria
EscapeCerebrospinal fluidConfirmation
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017;75:246–255) | Curr HIV/AIDS Rep (2015) 12:280–288 | AIDS. 2012 September 10; 26(14) | Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 50:773–8 | J Infect Dis. 2010; 202:1819–25 | J Virus Erad. 2016 Oct; 2(4): 242 | Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(8):1059–65 | J. Neurovirol. (2016) 22:852–860 | AIDS. 2016;30(7):1143–1144
Meningeal inflammation Neuro-Imaging HIV encephalitis Absence of alternative neuro-pathology diagnosis
4.0
4.4
2.3
3.4
1.7
1
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
Sep-16
Dec-16
Discordance Plasma CSF
Figure 5. CSF/Plasma dissociation
Cerebrospinal fluid
EscapeCerebrospinal fluidCNS drug resistance
**J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017;75:246–255) | Curr HIV/AIDS Rep (2015) 12:280–288 | *AIDS. 2012 September 10; 26(14) | ***Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 50:773–8 | J Infect Dis. 2010; 202:1819–25 | J Virus Erad. 2016 Oct; 2(4): 242 | Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(8):1059–65 | #J. Neurovirol. (2016) 22:852–860 | AIDS. 2016;30(7):1143–1144
Cerebrospinal fluid
some*, many**, majority***, all# cases had developed unique and significant resistance mutations in the CSF
Suggesting failure of the current treatment regimen in the central nervous system
EscapeCompartmentalized, asynchronous, “discordant”?
Reverse transcriptase (RT) gene
D67N K70R T215F M184V K103N K238T
Protease(PR) gene M46I L10F
Cerebrospinal fluid
October 2016: Failure of boosted PIsbased second-line ART regimen in the CSF
CNS drug resistance
EscapeCerebrospinal fluid
Reverse transcriptase (RT) gene
D67N K70R T215F M184V K103N K238T
Protease(PR) gene M46I L10F V82A/V
December 2016: Failure of boosted PIsbased second-line ART regimen in the plasma
Plasma drug resistance
EscapeCerebrospinal fluid
Compartmentalized, Asynchronous, discordance drug resistance?
Table 1. Reverse transcriptase (RT) gene drug resistance mutations & levelsMutations Drugs Mutation Scoring Resistance Levels***
CSF* Plasma** CSF Plasma CSF Plasma
D67N, K70R, M184V,T215F
D67N, K70R, M184V,T215F
ABC 40 40 Intermediate IntermediateAZT 80 80 High HighD4T 65 65 High HighFTC 60 60 High High3TC 60 60 High HighTDF 15 15 Low Low
K103N, K238T
K103N, K238T
EFV 90 90 High HighETR 0 0 Susceptible SusceptibleNVP 90 90 High HighRPV 0 0 Susceptible Susceptible
EscapeCerebrospinal fluid
Compartmentalized, Asynchronous, discordance drug resistance?
Table 2. Protease (PR) gene drug resistance mutations & levelsMutations Drugs Mutation Scoring Resistance Levels***
CSF* Plasma** CSF Plasma CSF Plasma
M46I, L10FM46I,
V82A/VL10F
ATV/r 10 35 Potential Low IntermediateDRV/r 5 5 Susceptible SusceptibleFPV/r 25 50 Low IntermediateIDV/r 20 60 Low HighLPV/r 15 55 Low IntermediateNFV 45 85 Intermediate HighSQV/r 10 35 Potential Low IntermediateTPV/r 5 5 Susceptible Susceptible
Plasma PIs resistance one or two levels relatively higher
Our Father
A CABBAGE !!!!!!!!
EscapeCerebrospinal fluidRational management
EscapeCerebrospinal fluidRational management
Antiretroviral therapy alteration
*J. Neurovirol. (2016) 22:852–860 | *Curr HIV/AIDS Rep (2015) 12:280–288** | *AIDS. 2012 September 10; 26(14)** | *Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 50(5):773–8**| J Virus Erad. 2016 Oct; 2(4): 242 | AIDS. 2016;30(7):1143–1144** | J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017;75:246–255) | *J Neurol (2017) 264:1715–1727 **
Drugresistance*& previous exposureCentral nervous system drug penetration**
Patient’s adherencemotivation, support & sustainmentRegimen switch and/or intensification
EscapeCerebrospinal fluidSouth African third line antiretroviral therapy
≥15two months earlier
Protease inhibitor resistance mutations scoring
than in the plasmain the central nervous system
Eligibility “criteria”
S Afr J HIV Med. 2017;18(1), a776. https://doi.org/10.4102/ sajhivmed.v18i1.776
on the Stanford University HIV Drug resistance Database
EscapeCerebrospinal fluidSouth African third line antiretroviral therapy
Building the regimen according to the algorithmDrug CSF
scorePlasma score
ATV 10 35
LPV 15 55
TDF 15 15
AZT 80 80
Additional InSTIand/or ETV not required with respectively TDF and DRV mutations scoring less than 29 and 15
Third line optionCSF plasma
DRV
DRV
TDF
TDF
S Afr J HIV Med. 2017;18(1), a776. https://doi.org/10.4102/ sajhivmed.v18i1.776
EscapeCerebrospinal fluidSouth African third line antiretroviral therapy
Building the regimen according to the algorithmDrug CSF
scorePlasma score
From the committee
ATV 10 35
LPV 15 55
TDF 15 15
AZT 80 80
DRVTDFFTC
Application submitted09/02/2017
Authorization granted09/05/2017
Treatment started09/04/2017
S Afr J HIV Med. 2017;18(1), a776. https://doi.org/10.4102/ sajhivmed.v18i1.776
EscapeCerebrospinal fluidBettering the regimen penetration effectiveness
“CPE score > … 7”Controversies about improved neurocognitive scores or lower CSF HIV-1 RNA with higher CPE values“Adjusted” CPE value thought to be a more accurate reflection of ART penetration in CSF escapeClin Infect Dis 2018;XX(00):1–9 | Arch Neurol. 2008;65(1):65-70 | Top Antivir Med. 2011 November ; 19(4): 137–142 | J Neurol (2017) 264:1715–1727 | AIDS. 2012 September 10; 26(14)
Central nervous system penetration effectiveness (CPE)
Neuro-symptomatic
EscapeBettering the regimen penetration effectivenessCerebrospinal fluid
Central nervous system penetration effectiveness (CPE)
Neuro-symptomatic
Table 3. CNS penetration effectiveness score (CPE), updated according to Letendre 2014
J Neurol (2017) 264:1715–1727 | Top Antivir Med (2011) 19:137–142
4 3 2 1NRTI’s Zidovudine Abacavir
EmtricitabineDidanosineLamivudineStavudine
Tenofovir
NNRTI’s Nevirapine EfavirenzEtravirine
Rilpivirine
PI’s Indinavir/r Darunavir/rFosamprenavir/rIndinavirLopinavir/r
AtazanavirAtazanavir/rFosamprenavir
NelfinavirRitonavirSaquinavirSaquinavir/rTipranavir
Entry/fusion inhibitors Maraviroc EnfuvirtideIntegrase inhibitors Dolutegravir Raltegravir Elvitegravir
The higher the score, the better the penetration into the CNS
Regimen CPE score
EscapeBettering the regimen penetration effectiveness
Drug CSF score
Plasma score
From the committee
ATV 10 35
LPV 15 55
TDF 15 15
AZT 80 80
TDFFTC
CPE “raw” CPE
“adjusted”
3 31 03 07 3
DRV
Cerebrospinal fluid
Central nervous system penetration effectiveness (CPE)
Neuro-symptomatic
J Neurol (2017) 264:1715–1727 | Top Antivir Med (2011) 19:137–142
Intensified Regimen CPE score
EscapeBettering the regimen penetration effectiveness
Drug CSF score
Plasma score
Pending approval
ATV 10 35
LPV 15 55
TDF 15 15
AZT 80 80
TDFFTC
CPE “raw” CPE
“adjusted”
9 91 03 013 9
RAL ETVDRV
Cerebrospinal fluid
Central nervous system penetration effectiveness (CPE)
Neuro-symptomatic
J Neurol (2017) 264:1715–1727 | Top Antivir Med (2011) 19:137–142
EscapeCerebrospinal fluidClinical outcomes
Neuro-symptomatic
Arrestof neurological deficitsreversal
in the majority of reported cases *J. Neurovirol. (2016) 22:852–860 | *Curr HIV/AIDS Rep (2015) 12:280–288** | *AIDS. 2012 September 10; 26(14)** | *Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 50(5):773–8**| | J Virus Erad. 2016 Oct; 2(4): 242 | AIDS. 2016;30(7):1143–1144** | J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017;75:246–255) | *J Neurol (2017) 264:1715–1727 **
and
EscapeReversalClinical outcomes
Neurological deficits
Day-7
Day8
Day0
Day14
ambulation
Unsteady
Gradual independency
of daily livingactivities
gait
wheelchair
Alert
Discharged
SeatedTalking
in a
Indwelling feeding
Crushedtreatment
gastric tube obtundation aphasia
Status epilepticus
Admission
neurogenic dysphagia
Escape8 days plasma HIV RNA
2 Log drop
4 months CSF HIV RNA Complete suppression
From 162,000 cpm (5.2 Log) to 1550 cpm (3.2 Log)
Viral suppression
Cerebrospinal fluidVirologic outcomes
Neuro-symptomatic
Figure 5. CSF/Plasma viral suppression (Log HIV RNA)
4.0
4.4
1.3
2.3
3.4
5.2
3.2
2.1
1.7
1
-0.8
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5
Sep-16
Dec-16
Apr-17*
Apr-17**
Aug-17Discordance Plasma CSF
EscapeCerebrospinal fluidConclusion
Neuro-symptomatic
“Real and emerging” clinical phenomenon
Significant impact and management implications
Asynchronous and discordant emergence of resistance
Context-specific management clinical guidance
Bi-compartmental suppression and neurological improvement
Acknowledgments
The patient & his familyEshowe District Hospital managementExperts (local and international)Ndlela LC & Mzilakazi S (students UKZN)
Nxele Nombuso Precious Famoroti TemitayoGordon MichelleMathilda Classen