Upload
donna-myles-mcmahon
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 AP BIO Cellular Respiration Lab
1/4
McMahon 1
Norris McMahon
1st Period Biology
10/30/09
Title: The Loss of Oxygen by Cellular Respiration
Introduction:
Cellular respiration is one process that eukaryotic cells use to make energy in the
form of ATP (adenine triphosphate) from organic compounds. There are two types ofcellular respiration, aerobic and anaerobic. Aerobic respiration requires the use of oxygen
to function properly and goes through glycolysis, the Krebs cycle, and the electron
transport chain. On the other hand anaerobic respiration works with the absence of
oxygen or without consuming any oxygen. Also anaerobic respiration, like fermentation,involves only glycolysis.
In anaerobic pathways, respiration tends to take place in the form of fermentation.
Fermentation produces ATP by substrate-level phosphorylation that derives from a steady
supply of NAD. There are two types of fermentation, which are alcohol fermentation andlactic acid fermentation. In alcohol fermentation pyruvate is converted into ethanol and in
lactic acid fermentation, pyruvate is reduced to make lactate from NADH. Alcoholicfermentation is useful in brewing and winemaking when it reacts with yeast. An example
of lactic acid fermentation is in human muscle cells. It helps yield ATP when oxygen is
limited.
Glycolysis is the beginning of cellular respiration, which takes place in thecytosol of a cell. The total pathways of glycolysis consist in 10 steps. The first five steps
are considered the energy investment phases where 2 ATP are being consumed. The
last five are the payoff phases, which yield 4 ATP and 2 NADH. In glycolysis, twoATP are used to phosphorylate the molecules. A net gain of 2 ATP is produced at the end
of glycolysis by substrate- level phosphorylation as well as 2NADH converted fromNAD+ by the oxidation of food. Glycolysis yields a total net gain of 2 ATP, 2 NADH, 2H20, and 2 pyruvate.
Once Glycolysis is done, cellular respiration continues into the mitochondrial
matrix where the Krebs cycle begins. The Krebs cycle uses the pyruvate left over fromglycolysis, which contains most of the chemical energy. Each pyruvate that enters the
mitochondrial matrix yields one molecule of Acetyl CoA. Acetyl CoA is formed through
a process when a multienzyme decarboxylizes, pyruvate oxidizes by the transfer of
electrons to NAD+, and coenzyme A is attached. In the eight steps of the Krebs cycle theacetyl CoA gives off carbon dioxide and later joins with oxaloacete, forming citrate. Each
time the Krebs cycle spins 3 NADH, 1 FADH2, and 1 ATP are produced. Being that for
every glucose molecule, 2 acetyl CoA are produced, the Krebs cycle produces a total of6 NADH, 2 FADH2, 2 ATP, and 4 CO2.
The electron transport chain (ETC) is the final ATP producer of cellular
respiration. Although the previous stages have produced some ATP through substrate-level phosphorylation, a majority is produced in the ETC through oxidative
phosphorylation. Electrons are transferred to the ETC by NADH and FADH from
glycolysis and the Krebs cycle. The NADH in the ETC provides a majority of ATP from
cellular respiration while FADH in the ETC produces two ATP. Adding the two ATP
8/3/2019 AP BIO Cellular Respiration Lab
2/4
McMahon 2
from glycolysis, and the two from the Krebs cycle, the total number of ATP produced
from cellular respiration is 36-38, depending on the amount made in the ETC.
In this experiment cellular respiration will be used to see how much carbondioxide is produced in the test tube of each variable.
Hypothesis: I predict that as more time allots, the amount of carbon dioxide will increasein the test tubes containing germinating peas. The independent variable, temperature
( Celsius) affected the dependent variables. The dependent variables are the germinating
vs. non germinating peas and the beads are the control.
Materials:
Six Large trays
Ice
Water
Safety equipment
Six Vials
Six steel washers Marker
100 ml graduated cylinder
Twenty germinating peas
Twenty nongerminating peas
Dry peas
Plastic beads
Paper towels
Cotton balls
Six Pipettes
Six ml of potassium hydroxide Non-absorbent rayon
Six stoppers
Petroleum jelly
Thermometer
Timer
Food coloring
Method: See Attached.
Data:
Initial/ Raw Readings
Contents in Test Tube Initial Reading of
Water(ml)
Final Reading of
Volume(ml)
Peas #1 50 54.5
Peas # 2 50 55.0
Beads #1 50 54.5
Beads # 2 50 55.0
Peas & Beads #1 50 54.5
8/3/2019 AP BIO Cellular Respiration Lab
3/4
McMahon 3
Peas & Beads #2 50 55.0
Uncertainty: + .01
Data Processing:
Contents in Test Tube Manipulated Date(ml)
Peas #1 4.5
Peas #2 5.0
Beads #1 4.5
Beads #2 5.0
Peas & Beads #1 4.5
Peas & Beads #2 5.0
Uncertainty: + .01
Final Reading Initial Reading = Manipulated Data
Manipulated Readings # 2
Beads Germinating Peas Peas and Beads
Temp(C) Time(m) Reading Differenc
e
R D Corrected R D C
25 0 .87 N/A .83 N/A N/A .89 N/A N/A
0-5 .88 .01 .79 -.04 -.05 .91 .02 .01
0-10 .88 .00 .76 -.07 -.07 .90 .01 .01
0-15 .88 .00 .73 -.10 -.10 .91 .02 .02
10 0 .80 N/A .85 N/A N/A .84 N/A N/A0-5 .84 .04 .79 -.06 -.10 .87 .03 -.01
0-10 .86 .06 .77 -.08 -.14 .89 .05 -.01
0-15 .86 .06 .74 -.11 -.17 .91 .07 .01
Uncertainty: + .01
Difference (D): Reading at time interval initial at 0 minutes
Corrected (C): Difference of (contents in test tube) Difference of (original contents intube)
Conclusion:
The group I was in for this lab was unable to finish all of the vials at each interval.Due to the fact that my group had blended results from another group, I am unsure as to
whether my hypothesis was supported or not. In part of my results I was able to see my
hypothesis supported and other parts, was unrelated. One example of this disunity would
be if one group maintained a constant temperature and the other groups temperaturewasnt close to the original/set temperature.
8/3/2019 AP BIO Cellular Respiration Lab
4/4
McMahon 4
Evaluation:
In this lab there were several possible occurrences of error. One error was thefood coloring. If the food coloring was not applied correctly it would spill out of the
pipette. A second error that possibly affected the results was the ice bath. It is hard to
maintain the ice bath at the same constant temperature, so the data could be affected bythat. Another source of error would be a simple misreading of the measurements and
misinterpreting the directions. Being that there was only a certain amount of time, our
group was hurried and tried to finish. Improvements to this lab could significantly changeyour results. If more time was allowed to do this lab or if the vials were set up precursor
to our arrival to class, my group would not have been rushed and would have been able to
get better readings. If the ice bath used had an easier way of maintaining a constant
temperature, it would provide more accurate results. The final enhancement to this labwould be the clarification of the instructions. At first, it took a while for my group to get
started because we were a bit baffled. However if the directions were more clear, it would
have taken us less time and wouldve given us more time.