17
APA frame inspection David Payne 24/10/20

APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    12

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

APA frame inspection

David Payne

24/10/20

Page 2: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

Procedure

● Basicly as defined in PSL TN-2016-03

● Some slight alterations● Frame was in wire

winding frame not free● Survey tool was FARO

Vantage laser tracker

Page 3: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

Point location tools

● Workshop at Liverpool made us some custom tools to precisely locate reflector at measurement points

Page 4: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

Cross corner deviation

● Tolerance: 2.0mm (1mm target)● On table measurement not possible

– Best alternative was using edging tool, constructing edge lines and corner points, taking distance between points:

Page 5: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

Measurements and co-ord system

● 6 points along each beam, 5 along head and foot.– P20 unreachable

due to winding frame- moved to next available point

● Co-ord system defined by plane of P1,P6,P12,P17, origin P20

Page 6: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

Flatness and twist

(all mm)

● Overall flatness tolerance: 11.0mm

● Overall twist tolerance 1.0 mm/m (?)

● Split into 5 twist zones (same tolerance)

● Zone 5 shows worst twist, but all within tolerance

Page 7: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

Comparison to PSL survey

Daresbury PSL

Page 8: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

Bowing (beam by beam)

● Deviation from line between head and foot in z (all mm)

● Tolerance 11.0mm

“right”

“left”“middle”

Page 9: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

Straightness

● Straightness of board mounting surfaces

● Deviation in y● Tolerance: 1.5 (1.0 target) ● (all mm)

“middle” (no defined tolerance)

“left”Max y dev. -1.5

“right”Max y dev.-1.2

Page 10: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

Comparison to PSL: Straightness

Daresbury

PSL

“Right” “Middle” “Left”

Page 11: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

Comparison to PSL

Daresbury PSL

Page 12: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

Fold

● Displacement in z of side beams relative to centre beam and z of head and foot

● Tolerance 1.2 mm

z

Fold 1.7 mm

Foot tube Rib 1 Rib 2 Rib 3 Rib 4 Head tube

Fold -0.8 mm

Fold -0.1 mm

Fold -0.6 mm

Fold 1.3 mm

Fold 1.3 mm

Page 13: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

Where is “folding” coming from?

● Have measurements along edge of head tube (used in slide 3)

● Suggests deviation is not in frame, but in reference points, or in method used to locate them

● Point location tools lift reflector some distance away from frame– Could be picking up and

amplifying surface shape

De v

iatio

n in

z fr

o m s

t ra

i gh t

y

Page 14: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

Summary

● APA surveyed in wire winding frame– Not according to original survey

conditions– Twist and bowing within tolerance– Straightness worse than target

but within tolerance– 3 fold measurements outside

tolerance

Page 15: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

Fold: rib 3

Fold 1.3 mm

Page 16: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

Fold: rib 4

Fold 1.7 mm

Page 17: APA frame inspection - INDICO-FNAL (Indico)

Fold: Head tube

Fold 1.3 mm