21
The World Agroforestry Centre’s interest in an Agroforestry Policy Initiative

Api iufro seoul august 2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Api iufro seoul august 2010

The World Agroforestry Centre’s interest in an

Agroforestry Policy Initiative

Page 2: Api iufro seoul august 2010

Policies effect everyone and everything( by their presence, absence, suitability, congruence)

Tony Simons, PhDWorld Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Kenya

Page 3: Api iufro seoul august 2010

What’s a Policy?- plan of action- statement of commitment- a governing principle- used to guide decisions- a set of rules

Can emanate from:

Intergovernmental bodyNational GovernmentMunicipal AuthorityPrivate CompanyInstitutionConsumer GroupAssociationVillageIndividuals

Page 4: Api iufro seoul august 2010

Protecting national grain reserve – by government control

Page 5: Api iufro seoul august 2010

Fertiliser subsidy by donor grants

Page 6: Api iufro seoul august 2010

Investing in tobacco infrastructure versus fruit processing by private sector

Page 7: Api iufro seoul august 2010

Water access rights by community group

Page 8: Api iufro seoul august 2010

Investing in forestry education by a University

Page 9: Api iufro seoul august 2010

Fairtrade standards by certifying agency

Page 10: Api iufro seoul august 2010

Why an Agroforestry Policy Initiative?

1. Growing recognition of and interest in agroforestry

Agroforestry practiced on roughly half of all agricultural lands globally

Agroforestry recognized as a critical land use for climate change adaptation and mitigation

Increased promotion of agroforestry by development organizations and calls for its upscaling, e.g. by the African ministers of agriculture, and through a new regulation law passed in Kenya

Page 11: Api iufro seoul august 2010

Prevalence of Agroforestry

Recent studies show that:

• There are about 1 billion ha of agricultural land globally with at least 10% tree cover, representing 46 % of agricultural land

• Of this area, some 374mi ha have more than 30% tree cover

• National studies in several countries have found trees on farms to be increasing over time

NB: Not all trees outside forests (TOFs) are necessarily in agroforestry formations. The purpose of planting/retaining trees and their use is an important consideration

Page 12: Api iufro seoul august 2010

Opportunities

• Urbanization and industrialization is opening new vistas for tree-based products

• Potential to reduce pressure on forests by planting trees that produce sought after products (e.g. timber)

• Rising awareness of the role of trees in livelihoods and environmental improvement

• Renewed interest to regenerate degraded lands

• Climate change mitigation and adaptation

• Increased policy recognition and interest

Page 13: Api iufro seoul august 2010

Why an Agroforestry Policy Initiative?

2. Evidence of strong policy effects with respect to the adoption of agroforestry, the policy arena for agroforestry is complex, and collaboration and coordination would seem to enhance likelihood of success

Some key policy areas for agroforestry include:

• unintended adverse effects of forestry regulations

• property rights laws or arrangements that may discourage agroforestry

• fragmentation of agroforestry related mandates across ministries

• incentives favoring short term over long term investment

• Inadequate recognition, valuation, and reward of environmental services from agroforestry

• poor information and germplasm systems in agroforestry

Page 14: Api iufro seoul august 2010

Potential of Policy Change for Agroforestry Development: The Case of Niger

Restrictive forest codes in the Sahel were beginning to be relaxed in Niger so that trees planted or managed on farmers’ fields could remain the property of the farmer and not revert to the government. The change in three decades, was dramatic.

Galma, Niger in 1975 and 2003

Source: World Vision Australia

Page 15: Api iufro seoul august 2010

Multi-sectoral approach to an improved policy environment for agroforestry

• Rural development – providing rural conditions conducive for promoting investment, growth, and prosperity in agroforestry and other enterprises (e.g. infrastructure, electricity)

• Agriculture – providing needed information services in agroforestry and catalyzing growth opportunities where private sector is absent or inefficient

• Forestry – creating incentives that conserve priority natural forest habitats while not discouraging planting, management, and harvesting of trees elsewhere in the landscape

• Environment (water, soils) – including agroforestry as an option to be used in appropriate conditions to address water and soil problems

• Commerce – including tree products among the opportunities analyzed for potential growth areas and support

• Lands – enhancing long term rights to communities and smallholders• Energy, water etc

Page 16: Api iufro seoul august 2010

So the Concept of an Agroforestry Policy Initiative was hatched within ICRAF

Explored by the ICRAF board in 2008 and became a formal research area in 2009

Internally, an API is useful to help coordinate and prioritize our research and knowledge to action efforts in the area of policy – e.g. help to clarify our major impact/outcome pathways

But for an API to have significant outcomes or impact, ICRAF would ideally have a supportive research role within a wider demand driven process also involving partnership with FAO and other organizations closer to direct policy and development support

Page 17: Api iufro seoul august 2010

Scope of the agroforestry policy initiative

Cover the wide scope of agroforestry as practices on fields, farms and landscapes by rural users

Change at all levels (e.g. climate change conventions, NEPAD strategies, promotion by RECs, and supportive policy change by national governments) may all be needed for major transformation

However, we see the national level as most critical in policy documents such as:

•Strategies•Planning documents•Laws, acts, & other legislation•Regulations, rules, procedures, guides•Programmes

Page 18: Api iufro seoul august 2010

Purpose of a collaborative partnership on Agroforestry Policy from an ICRAF perspective

The purpose of an Agroforestry Policy Initiative could be to:

(1) stimulate awareness and discussion of the importance of agroforestry and its mainstreaming into policy planning

(2) identify key policy constraints that impinge on the incentives for farmers to invest in agroforestry and the rationale for policy reform

(3) provide information, tools, and other technical assistance to policy stakeholders to support policy and programmatic decision making about agroforestry (including formulation and implementation)

Page 19: Api iufro seoul august 2010

ICRAF role in an Agroforestry Policy Initiative

To provide scientific leadership and evidence to the API in the following areas:

(1) assessing the multiple domains of contributions of agroforestry to livelihoods and ecosystem services and quantifying them where possible,

(2) identifying the nature of various policy constraints to agroforestry and measuring their extent and magnitude,

(3) providing evidence on good policy practices that enhance agroforestry impacts on livelihoods and ecosystem services,

(4) providing guidance on successful processes and approaches for policy reforms and implementation in agroforestry, and

(5) providing a forum for learning and sharing knowledge within the API.

And, with others, to catalyze and champion progress in improved

polices for agroforestry

Page 20: Api iufro seoul august 2010

World Agroforestry Centre Progress in this area: 2009-2010

Presentations to raise awareness of agroforestry policy issues at the World Agroforestry Congress, August 2009, World Forestry Congress, October 2009 and now IUFRO 2010

Consultations with potential partners and users at the Agroforestry Congress

Engaged in policy discussions at global and national level

Undertaking various research activities of relevance to the initiative

In process of hiring a policy scientist to join the initiative

Joining the FAO led collaboration on ‘Agroforestry guidelines for national policy and decision making’ with CATIE and CIRAD.

Page 21: Api iufro seoul august 2010

In conclusion,

We welcome thoughts and ideas on how we can forge partnerships and collaborative actions to:

Stimulate greater awareness of the policy importance of agroforestry

Identify best ways of supporting policy making processes that are relevant to agroforestry

And especially to explore how our efforts can effectively reach to national levels, where policy changes can have the most profound impacts