30
PERIPHERAL AND CENTRAL AUDITORY ASSESSMENT Ravi Pachigolla, MD Jeffery T. Vrabec, MD

Auditory assess 200003

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Auditory assess 200003

PERIPHERAL AND CENTRAL AUDITORY ASSESSMENT

Ravi Pachigolla, MDJeffery T. Vrabec, MD

Page 2: Auditory assess 200003

Introduction

Pure tone audiometryTympanometryAcoustic reflex measurementsECochGAuditory Brainstem Response (ABR)Otoacoustic Emissions

Page 3: Auditory assess 200003

Pure Tone Audiometry

Most common test Threshold of audibility Activation of auditory

system Energy formatted into

neural code Air conduction assesses

entire system Bone conduction assesses

cochlea onwards

Page 4: Auditory assess 200003

Pure Tones

Auditory acuitySpectrally specificHigh frequency tones stimulate basal

turn of the cochleaLow frequency tones stimulate apical

turn of the cochlea

Page 5: Auditory assess 200003

Decibel Scales

Sound Pressure Level (SPL)

Hearing Level (HL)Sensation Level

(SL)

Page 6: Auditory assess 200003

Assessment of thresholds

Octave frequencies testedBone conduction thresholdsMastoid or forehead usedMastoid preferred because less

intensity requiredOcclusion effectAscending series of tone presentations

Page 7: Auditory assess 200003

Speech Audiometry

Speech Reception Threshold using spondaic words Standardized word lists Familiarization with spondees Ascending series of presentation Excellent speech discrimination in conductive hearing loss

patients Poor speech discrimination in cochlear hearing loss

patients Poorest speech discrimination in retrocochlear hearing loss

patients

Page 8: Auditory assess 200003

Clinical Masking

Nontest ear can influence thresholds of test ear

Shadow curve apparent without masking

Interaural attenuation varies from 40 to 80 dB with air conduction

Interaural attenuation is about 0 dB with bone conduction

Page 9: Auditory assess 200003

Shadow Curve

Page 10: Auditory assess 200003

Clinical Masking cont.

Compare bone conduction threshold of nontest ear with air conduction threshold of test ear to determine whether masking is necessary

Page 11: Auditory assess 200003

Masking using narrow bands of noise

Page 12: Auditory assess 200003

Plateau method

Mask nontest ear with progressively greater amounts of sound until threshold does not rise.

Masking Dilemma

Page 13: Auditory assess 200003

Acoustic Immitance

ImpedanceReflected energyTympanometryAcoustic Reflex

Page 14: Auditory assess 200003

Tympanometry configurations

Page 15: Auditory assess 200003

Acoustic Reflex Threshold

Stapedial muscle contraction

Temporary increase in middle impedance

Bilateral Stimulation Adaptation Neural network in lower

brainstem

Page 16: Auditory assess 200003

Clinical application of ASR

Middle Ear DiseaseOtosclerosisCochlear hearing loss and loudness

recruitmentRetrocochlear lesions may abolish the ASRBrainstem lesions may abolish the

contralateral reflexesDetermination of site of a seventh nerve lesionAcoustic Reflex Decay

Page 17: Auditory assess 200003

Electrocochleography

Cochlear MicrophonicSummating PotentialCompound Action PotentialIncreased SP/AP ratio suggests

hydropsAbility to enhance wave I of the ABR

in patients with severe high frequency hearing loss

Page 18: Auditory assess 200003

Electrocochleography setup

Page 19: Auditory assess 200003

ECochG and Meniere’s

Increased SP/AP ratio

Latency not important

Ratio greater than 0.45 suggests meniere’s

Hydrops affects elasticity of the basilar membrane

Page 20: Auditory assess 200003

Auditory Brainstem Response

Auditory evoked potentialFarfield recordingAcoustic clicks or tonal stimuli usedRate of stimulus presentation

Page 21: Auditory assess 200003

ABR continued

Waves I - V Unaffected by sleep and

pharmacotherapy ABR latencies decrease

from birth until 2 years Wave V used for threshold

testing (most robust) ABR thresholds about 10

to 20 dB poorer than behavioral measures

Page 22: Auditory assess 200003

Latency of response

Page 23: Auditory assess 200003

ABR continued

Lesions of the eighth cranial nerveInterwave latencyInteraural latency differenceAbsolute latencyAmplitude ratio

Page 24: Auditory assess 200003

Retrocochlear lesion

Page 25: Auditory assess 200003

Otoacoustic Emissions

Energy leakageEvidence of a healthy, functioning

cochleaSpontaneous and evoked emissionsEvoked emission seen only in cochleae

with thresholds less than 20 to 30 dBConductive losses affect emissionsScreening tool in infants

Page 26: Auditory assess 200003

Central Auditory Function

ComprehensionBackground noiseBehavioral testsMonotic vs. dichoticMonaural vs. binaural

Page 27: Auditory assess 200003

Case Presentation

31 yo male with left sided hearing loss noticed when listening to portable radio

No other otologic complaints, no pmh or contributory family or social history

PE normal

Page 28: Auditory assess 200003

Audiogram

Page 29: Auditory assess 200003

Assessment

Mild high frequency sensorineural hearing loss

Small amount of rolloverIpsi reflexes elevated in left earContra reflexes elevated in left ear

suggesting retrocochlear pathologyMRI showed 5 mm acoustic neuroma

Page 30: Auditory assess 200003

Analysis

Abnormal reflex responses in left ear indicate 7th nerve affected

Elevated contralateral thresholds in right ear means that decussating pathways from left VCN to right brainstem affected