12
Babylonian Maths Babylonian Maths Numbers in base 60

Babylonian Maths

  • Upload
    shyla

  • View
    188

  • Download
    13

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Babylonian Maths. Numbers in base 60. What do you think these five numbers are?. What do you think these five numbers are?. 20. What do you think these five numbers are?. 20. 40. What do you think these five numbers are?. 20. 53. 40. What do you think these five numbers are?. 20. 53. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Babylonian  Maths

Babylonian MathsBabylonian Maths

Numbers in base 60

Page 2: Babylonian  Maths

• What do you think these five numbers are?

Page 3: Babylonian  Maths

• What do you think these five numbers are?

20

Page 4: Babylonian  Maths

• What do you think these five numbers are?

2040

Page 5: Babylonian  Maths

• What do you think these five numbers are?

20 5340

Page 6: Babylonian  Maths

• What do you think these five numbers are?

20

28

5340

Page 7: Babylonian  Maths

• What do you think these five numbers are?

20

4928

5340

Page 8: Babylonian  Maths

In base 60 …In base 60 …• Any number between 1 and

60 corresponds to the units in our numbers.

• Getting to 60 in base 60 is like getting to 10 in base 10.

• We don’t need a new symbol when we get to 10, and the Babylonians didn’t need a new symbol for 60.

Page 9: Babylonian  Maths

• What do you think these three numbers are?

60 + 10 60 + 20 120 + 10= 70 = 80 = 130

Page 10: Babylonian  Maths

• What do you think these two numbers are?

2 x 60 + 13 3 x 60 + 28= 133 = 208

Page 11: Babylonian  Maths

Writing numbers in Writing numbers in base 60base 60• You don’t have to write base 60

numbers in cuneiform symbols.• Look at these base 60 numbers – can

you work out what they mean?

• Can you change these base 10 numbers into base 60?

Base 60

0 18

1 39 3 06 11 20

Base 10

18 60 + 39 = 99

180 + 6 = 186

660 + 20 = 680

Base 10

29 69 149 299

Base 60

29 1 09 2 29 4 59

Page 12: Babylonian  Maths

ZeroZero• The Babylonians didn’t have a

separate symbol for 0.• This number would have meant

3600 + 1 = 3601

• The zero lots of 60 would have just been a gap.

• Is this a good way of showing a zero, do you think?