121
Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study

April 2014

FINAL REPORTAPPENDIX A

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS

S A N F R A N C I S C O C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N A U T H O R I T Y

Page 2: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

BALBOA PARK STAT ION C IRCULAT ION STUDY – APPEND IX A | APR IL 2014

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTAT ION AUTHORITY | Page A1

APPENDIX A:

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS

DESCRIPTION

This appendix contains the technical transportation analysis of existing conditions, baseline conditions, and the two proposed alternatives. Intersection level of service has been calculated for all study intersections for these alternatives in addition to transit delay. A traffic microsimulation was undertaken for Alternative 1, Element 4. Element 3 of Alternative 1 was not under consideration as a standalone element at the time that this evaluation took place, and is therefore not assessed in this document. As part of the iterative process, the inception of Element 3 occurred after the detailed analysis stage. While the exact configuration of this element was not part of the detailed analysis, it is a subset of Alternative 1, Element 4, which was analyzed in detail. As such, the findings from detailed analysis of Alternative 1, Element 4 informed the decision to include Element 3 as a viable concept. Similarly, the potential Element 3 of Alternative 2 was not under consideration at the time that this evaluation took place. Moreover, Elements 1 and 2 of Alternative 2 were evaluated as a single element and is presented as such in this appendix.

CONTENTS

Summary of Intersection Levels of Service

Study Intersection Level of Service Reports

o Existing Conditions

o Baseline Conditions

o Alternative 1, Element 1

o Alternative 1, Element 2

o Alternative 1, Element 4

o Alternative 2

Transit Delay Sheets

SimTraffic Reports

o Alternative 1, Element 4

Page 3: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

11/19/2013

14 Arlington & Bosworth

C (F)

2013 Existing

2013 Existing PM 13 Monterey & 280 Ramps

D

2001 1 2 3 4 5 6

C B A #N/A D B C

7 8 17

A (A) D 9 A (B)

E

10 11 12 Geneva

C E C

San Jose & Sagamore 15

C

San Jose & Alemany 16

C LOS in parantheses is worst approach for unsignalized intersections

Ho

wth

I-2

80

I-2

80

Ale

ma

ny

Sa

n J

ose

Ocean

Ca

yu

ga

Page 4: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

11/21/2013

14 Arlington & Bosworth

C (F)

2013 Baseline

2013 Baseline PM 13 Monterey & 280 Ramps

D

2001 1 2 3 4 5 6

C B A #N/A C C C

7 8 17

A C 9 A (B)

D

10 11 12 Geneva

C B C

San Jose & Sagamore 15

C

San Jose & Alemany 16

C LOS in parantheses is worst approach for unsignalized intersections

Ale

ma

ny

Ho

wth

I-2

80

I-2

80

Ocean

Sa

n J

ose

Ca

yu

ga

Page 5: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

11/19/201314 Arlington & BosworthC (F)

2013 Scenario1C2013 Alternative 1, Element 1 PM 13 Monterey & 280 Ramps

D

2001 1 2 3 4 5 6C B B #N/A D C C

7 8 17A C 9 A (C)

C10 11 12 GenevaD A C

San Jose & Sagamore 15C

San Jose & Alemany 16C LOS in parantheses is worst approach for unsignalized intersections

Alem

any

Howth

I‐280

I‐280

Ocean

San Jose

Cayuga

Page 6: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

11/19/201314 Arlington & BosworthD (F)

2013 Scenario1D2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 PM 13 Monterey & 280 Ramps

D

2001 1 2 3 4 5 6C B A C D C C

7 8 17A C 9 A (B)

D10 11 12 GenevaC C C

San Jose & Sagamore 15C

San Jose & Alemany 16C LOS in parantheses is worst approach for unsignalized intersections

I‐280

Ocean

Cayuga

Alem

any

Howth

I‐280

San Jose

Page 7: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

11/19/201314 Arlington & BosworthC (F)

2013 Scenario1B2013 Alternative 1, Element 4 PM 13 Monterey & 280 Ramps

D

2001 1 2 3 4 5 6C B A E F D C

7 8 17A C 9 A (B)

C10 11 12 GenevaC A C

San Jose & Sagamore 15C

San Jose & Alemany 16C LOS in parantheses is worst approach for unsignalized intersections

Alem

any

Howth

I‐280

I‐280

Ocean

San Jose

Cayuga

Page 8: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

11/19/2013

14 Arlington & Bosworth

C (F)

2013 Scenario2

2013 Alternative 2 PM 13 Monterey & 280 Ramps

D

2001 1 2 3 4 5 6

C D A #N/A A B C

7 8 17

D F 9 A (C)

F

10 11 12 Geneva

D C C

San Jose & Sagamore 15

C

San Jose & Alemany 16

C LOS in parantheses is worst approach for unsignalized intersections

Ale

ma

ny

Ho

wth

I-2

80

I-2

80

Ocean

Sa

n J

ose

Ca

yu

ga

Page 9: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

1: Ocean & Geneva Ave 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 1

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 985 0 0 970 462 4

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Grade (%) 5% 5% 0%

Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.97

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00

Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00

Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95

Satd. Flow (prot) 3336 3336 3310

Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95

Satd. Flow (perm) 3336 3336 3310

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 1048 0 0 1032 491 4

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 1 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 1048 0 0 1032 494 0

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 400 100 100 400

Turn Type

Protected Phases 13 1 8

Permitted Phases

Actuated Green, G (s) 46.0 46.0 26.0

Effective Green, g (s) 46.0 46.0 26.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.32

Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0

Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1918 1918 1076

v/s Ratio Prot c0.31 0.31 c0.15

v/s Ratio Perm

v/c Ratio 0.55 0.54 0.46

Uniform Delay, d1 10.5 10.5 21.4

Progression Factor 0.50 1.71 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.9 0.3

Delay (s) 6.1 18.8 21.7

Level of Service A B C

Approach Delay (s) 6.1 18.8 21.7

Approach LOS A B C

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 14.2 HCM Level of Service B

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.2% ICU Level of Service C

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 10: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

2001: Ocean & Phelan 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 18

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 107 833 396 0 1165 469 0 0 0 152 304 110

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Grade (%) 5% 0% 0% 0%

Total Lost time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95

Frt 1.00 0.95 0.96 0.97

Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99

Satd. Flow (prot) 1668 3175 4704 3277

Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99

Satd. Flow (perm) 1668 3175 4704 3277

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 114 886 421 0 1239 499 0 0 0 162 323 117

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 71 0 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 26 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 114 1236 0 0 1652 0 0 0 0 0 576 0

Turn Type Prot Perm

Protected Phases 5 2 6 4

Permitted Phases 4

Actuated Green, G (s) 10.4 46.0 32.1 26.0

Effective Green, g (s) 10.4 46.0 32.1 26.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.58 0.40 0.32

Clearance Time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0

Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 217 1826 1887 1065

v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.39 c0.35

v/s Ratio Perm 0.18

v/c Ratio 0.53 0.68 0.88 0.54

Uniform Delay, d1 32.5 11.8 22.1 22.1

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.12 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 2.0 5.5 0.6

Delay (s) 34.8 13.9 30.4 22.7

Level of Service C B C C

Approach Delay (s) 15.5 30.4 0.0 22.7

Approach LOS B C A C

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 23.6 HCM Level of Service C

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.5% ICU Level of Service D

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 11: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

2: Ocean & Howth 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 0 760 0 0 976 50 48 10 61 50 0 10

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00

Frt 1.00 0.99 0.93 0.98

Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.96

Satd. Flow (prot) 3421 3396 1643 1689

Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.75

Satd. Flow (perm) 3421 3396 1473 1324

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 0 809 0 0 1038 53 51 11 65 53 0 11

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 44 0 0 7 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 809 0 0 1087 0 0 83 0 0 57 0

Turn Type Perm Perm

Protected Phases 6 6 8 4

Permitted Phases 8 4

Actuated Green, G (s) 45.0 45.0 26.0 26.0

Effective Green, g (s) 45.0 45.0 26.0 26.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.32 0.32

Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1924 1910 479 430

v/s Ratio Prot 0.24 c0.32

v/s Ratio Perm c0.06 0.04

v/c Ratio 0.42 0.57 0.17 0.13

Uniform Delay, d1 10.0 11.3 19.3 19.0

Progression Factor 0.20 1.00 0.98 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 1.2 0.8 0.6

Delay (s) 2.6 12.5 19.6 19.7

Level of Service A B B B

Approach Delay (s) 2.6 12.5 19.6 19.7

Approach LOS A B B B

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 9.3 HCM Level of Service A

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.7% ICU Level of Service C

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 12: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

4: Ocean & I-280 On Ramp 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 3

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 497 416 7 9 532 186 7 0 0 0 0 0

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00

Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00

Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95

Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 1769 872 1556 872

Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95

Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 1769 872 1556 872

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97

Adj. Flow (vph) 512 429 7 9 548 192 7 0 0 0 0 0

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 512 436 0 9 732 0 0 7 0 0 0 0

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10

Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 100% 100% 2% 2% 100% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2%

Turn Type Prot Prot Perm

Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 14

Permitted Phases 14

Actuated Green, G (s) 53.0 134.2 5.4 84.6 5.4

Effective Green, g (s) 53.0 134.2 5.4 84.6 5.4

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.86 0.03 0.54 0.03

Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0

Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 581 1522 30 844 30

v/s Ratio Prot c0.30 0.25 0.01 c0.47

v/s Ratio Perm 0.01

v/c Ratio 0.88 0.29 0.30 0.87 0.23

Uniform Delay, d1 48.5 2.0 73.5 30.8 73.3

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 14.2 0.5 2.0 11.6 1.5

Delay (s) 62.8 2.5 75.5 42.5 74.7

Level of Service E A E D E

Approach Delay (s) 35.0 42.9 74.7 0.0

Approach LOS D D E A

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 38.7 HCM Level of Service D

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 156.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.6% ICU Level of Service G

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 13: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

5: Ocean & San Jose 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 33 348 40 102 475 48 115 255 86 52 286 109

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.97

Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.99

Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.97 0.97

Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.99

Satd. Flow (prot) 1784 1329 1618 1740 3163 1665

Flt Permitted 0.84 1.00 0.39 1.00 0.70 0.90

Satd. Flow (perm) 1503 1329 660 1740 2256 1509

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 35 370 43 109 505 51 122 271 91 55 304 116

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 15 0 6 0 0 30 0 0 18 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 405 28 109 550 0 0 454 0 0 457 0

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm

Protected Phases 4 8 2 6

Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6

Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 29.0 29.0

Effective Green, g (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 29.0 29.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.45 0.45

Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 624 552 274 723 1007 673

v/s Ratio Prot c0.32

v/s Ratio Perm 0.27 0.02 0.17 0.20 c0.30

v/c Ratio 0.65 0.05 0.40 0.76 0.45 0.68

Uniform Delay, d1 15.2 11.3 13.3 16.2 12.5 14.3

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 5.2 0.2 4.3 7.4 1.5 5.5

Delay (s) 20.4 11.5 17.6 23.7 13.9 19.8

Level of Service C B B C B B

Approach Delay (s) 19.5 22.7 13.9 19.8

Approach LOS B C B B

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 19.3 HCM Level of Service B

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 116.1% ICU Level of Service H

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 14: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

6: Ocean & Alemany 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 5

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 119 226 42 51 225 75 51 550 52 241 801 215

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88

Flpb, ped/bikes 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00

Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85

Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00

Satd. Flow (prot) 1625 1729 1618 1687 3402 1175 3353 1351

Flt Permitted 0.43 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.65 1.00

Satd. Flow (perm) 739 1729 813 1687 2633 1175 2217 1351

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 127 240 45 54 239 80 54 585 55 256 852 229

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 15 0 0 0 22 0 0 92

Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 276 0 54 304 0 0 639 33 0 1108 137

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10 10 10

Parking (#/hr) 6

Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm

Protected Phases 2 2 6 6

Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 6 6

Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0

Effective Green, g (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54

Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 249 584 274 569 1415 632 1192 726

v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 c0.18

v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.07 0.24 0.03 c0.50 0.10

v/c Ratio 0.51 0.47 0.20 0.53 0.45 0.05 0.93 0.19

Uniform Delay, d1 21.2 20.9 18.8 21.4 11.3 8.8 17.1 9.5

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 7.3 2.7 1.6 3.6 1.0 0.2 13.9 0.6

Delay (s) 28.5 23.6 20.4 25.0 12.3 9.0 31.0 10.1

Level of Service C C C C B A C B

Approach Delay (s) 25.1 24.3 12.1 27.4

Approach LOS C C B C

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 22.9 HCM Level of Service C

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 133.3% ICU Level of Service H

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 15: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

7: Geneva Ave & Howth 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (veh/h) 23 534 38 361 693 130 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop

Grade 5% 5% 0% 0%

Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Hourly flow rate (vph) 24 568 40 384 737 138 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pedestrians 100 100

Lane Width (ft) 0.0 0.0

Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0

Percent Blockage 0 0

Right turn flare (veh)

Median type None None

Median storage veh)

Upstream signal (ft) 764 563

pX, platoon unblocked

vC, conflicting volume 976 709 1874 2481 404 2007 2432 538

vC1, stage 1 conf vol

vC2, stage 2 conf vol

vCu, unblocked vol 976 709 1874 2481 404 2007 2432 538

tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9

tC, 2 stage (s)

tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3

p0 queue free % 97 57 100 100 100 100 100 100

cM capacity (veh/h) 703 886 28 16 596 22 17 488

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3

Volume Total 309 324 384 491 384

Volume Left 24 0 384 0 0

Volume Right 0 40 0 0 138

cSH 703 1700 886 1700 1700

Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.19 0.43 0.29 0.23

Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 55 0 0

Control Delay (s) 1.2 0.0 12.1 0.0 0.0

Lane LOS A B

Approach Delay (s) 0.6 3.7

Approach LOS

Intersection Summary

Average Delay 2.7

Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.9% ICU Level of Service A

Analysis Period (min) 15

Page 16: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

8: Geneva Ave & I280 SB Off 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 7

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 0 336 180 476 713 0 0 0 0 487 1 185

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12

Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95

Frpb, ped/bikes 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.91

Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00

Frt 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.92

Flt Protected 1.00 0.98 0.95 0.98

Satd. Flow (prot) 2446 2961 1513 1305

Flt Permitted 1.00 0.57 0.95 0.98

Satd. Flow (perm) 2446 1724 1513 1305

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96

Adj. Flow (vph) 0 350 188 496 743 0 0 0 0 507 1 193

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 459 0 0 1239 0 0 0 0 360 289 0

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 30 30

Parking (#/hr) 5 5

Turn Type pm+pt Perm

Protected Phases 2 1 6 4

Permitted Phases 6 4

Actuated Green, G (s) 31.5 63.5 19.5 19.5

Effective Green, g (s) 31.5 63.5 19.5 19.5

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.71 0.22 0.22

Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 856 1615 328 283

v/s Ratio Prot 0.19 c0.25

v/s Ratio Perm c0.29 c0.24 0.22

v/c Ratio 0.54 0.77 1.10 1.02

Uniform Delay, d1 23.4 8.5 35.2 35.2

Progression Factor 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 2.0 78.5 58.6

Delay (s) 25.8 3.6 113.7 93.8

Level of Service C A F F

Approach Delay (s) 25.8 3.6 0.0 104.0

Approach LOS C A A F

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 36.8 HCM Level of Service D

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 7.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.0% ICU Level of Service E

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 17: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

9: Geneva Ave & I280 NB On 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 108 730 0 0 709 195 468 5 616 0 0 0

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11

Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.87

Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.86

Flt Protected 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00

Satd. Flow (prot) 3059 3042 974 1513 1185

Flt Permitted 0.55 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00

Satd. Flow (perm) 1678 3042 974 1513 1185

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97

Adj. Flow (vph) 111 753 0 0 731 201 482 5 635 0 0 0

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 98 0 0 0 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 864 0 0 731 160 434 590 0 0 0 0

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10

Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0

Turn Type custom Perm Perm

Protected Phases 2 6 8

Permitted Phases 5 6 8

Actuated Green, G (s) 47.0 24.5 24.5 36.0 36.0

Effective Green, g (s) 47.0 24.5 24.5 36.0 36.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.27 0.27 0.40 0.40

Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 876 828 265 605 474

v/s Ratio Prot 0.24

v/s Ratio Perm c0.51 0.16 0.29 0.50

v/c Ratio 1.54dl 0.88 0.60 0.72 1.24

Uniform Delay, d1 21.2 31.4 28.5 22.7 27.0

Progression Factor 0.76 0.77 0.66 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 18.0 9.8 7.0 7.1 126.5

Delay (s) 34.2 33.8 25.8 29.9 153.5

Level of Service C C C C F

Approach Delay (s) 34.2 32.1 105.7 0.0

Approach LOS C C F A

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 61.0 HCM Level of Service E

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.10

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 7.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.6% ICU Level of Service F

Analysis Period (min) 15

dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.

c Critical Lane Group

Page 18: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

10: Geneva Ave & San Jose Ave 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 186 962 159 23 622 64 83 148 29 33 130 183

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 0.82

Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98

Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.92

Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00

Satd. Flow (prot) 1520 2870 1463 2842 2825 2096

Flt Permitted 0.20 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.74 0.90

Satd. Flow (perm) 320 2870 240 2842 2120 1897

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 198 1023 169 24 662 68 88 157 31 35 138 195

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 198 1184 0 24 730 0 0 267 0 0 368 0

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 400 400 400 400 400 400 400

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 30 30 10 10

Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 6 0 6 6 0 6 0 0 6 0

Parking (#/hr) 5 5

Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm

Protected Phases 7 4 8 2 6

Permitted Phases 4 8 6

Actuated Green, G (s) 41.0 41.0 30.0 30.0 38.5 38.5

Effective Green, g (s) 41.0 41.0 30.0 30.0 38.5 38.5

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.46 0.33 0.33 0.43 0.43

Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5

Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 226 1307 80 947 907 811

v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.41 0.26

v/s Ratio Perm 0.34 0.10 0.13 c0.19

v/c Ratio 0.88 0.91 0.30 0.77 5.87dl 0.45

Uniform Delay, d1 20.1 22.7 22.2 26.9 16.9 18.3

Progression Factor 1.01 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 4.7 1.2 9.4 6.0 0.8 1.8

Delay (s) 25.1 23.5 31.6 33.0 17.7 20.1

Level of Service C C C C B C

Approach Delay (s) 23.7 32.9 17.7 20.1

Approach LOS C C B C

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 25.1 HCM Level of Service C

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.5

Intersection Capacity Utilization 122.3% ICU Level of Service H

Analysis Period (min) 15

dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.

dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane.

c Critical Lane Group

Page 19: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

10: Geneva Ave & San Jose Ave 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 10

Movement SER

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 0

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900

Total Lost time (s)

Lane Util. Factor

Frpb, ped/bikes

Flpb, ped/bikes

Frt

Flt Protected

Satd. Flow (prot)

Flt Permitted

Satd. Flow (perm)

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 0

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 0

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 400

Confl. Bikes (#/hr)

Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0

Parking (#/hr)

Turn Type custom

Protected Phases

Permitted Phases 13

Actuated Green, G (s)

Effective Green, g (s)

Actuated g/C Ratio

Clearance Time (s)

Vehicle Extension (s)

Lane Grp Cap (vph)

v/s Ratio Prot

v/s Ratio Perm

v/c Ratio

Uniform Delay, d1

Progression Factor

Incremental Delay, d2

Delay (s)

Level of Service

Approach Delay (s)

Approach LOS

Intersection Summary

Page 20: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

11: Geneva Ave & Cayuga Ave 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 11

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop

Volume (vph) 59 767 46 61 643 50 57 39 61 26 64 63

Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96

Hourly flow rate (vph) 61 799 48 64 670 52 59 41 64 27 67 66

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1

Volume Total (vph) 461 447 398 387 164 159

Volume Left (vph) 61 0 64 0 59 27

Volume Right (vph) 0 48 0 52 64 66

Hadj (s) 0.10 -0.04 0.11 -0.06 -0.13 -0.18

Departure Headway (s) 7.3 7.1 7.4 7.2 7.7 7.6

Degree Utilization, x 0.93 0.88 0.82 0.78 0.35 0.34

Capacity (veh/h) 491 502 478 488 454 453

Control Delay (s) 50.5 42.1 35.0 30.0 14.7 14.5

Approach Delay (s) 46.3 32.5 14.7 14.5

Approach LOS E D B B

Intersection Summary

Delay 35.9

HCM Level of Service E

Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.5% ICU Level of Service D

Analysis Period (min) 15

Page 21: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

12: Geneva Ave & Alemany 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 12

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 131 616 83 107 533 267 79 547 247 49 664 102

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95

Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98

Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00

Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3360 1711 3250 1711 3262 1711 3353

Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00

Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 3360 1711 3250 1711 3262 1711 3353

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 139 655 88 114 567 284 84 582 263 52 706 109

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 7 0 0 45 0 0 45 0 0 11 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 139 736 0 114 806 0 84 800 0 52 804 0

Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot

Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6

Permitted Phases

Actuated Green, G (s) 13.2 31.5 12.1 30.4 8.6 30.3 7.0 28.7

Effective Green, g (s) 13.2 31.5 12.1 30.4 8.6 30.3 7.0 28.7

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.33 0.13 0.32 0.09 0.32 0.07 0.30

Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 236 1104 216 1030 153 1031 125 1003

v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.22 0.07 c0.25 0.05 c0.25 0.03 c0.24

v/s Ratio Perm

v/c Ratio 0.59 0.67 0.53 0.78 0.55 0.78 0.42 0.80

Uniform Delay, d1 38.8 27.7 39.2 29.7 41.8 29.7 42.5 31.0

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 3.7 1.2 2.3 3.6 4.0 3.4 2.2 4.4

Delay (s) 42.5 28.9 41.5 33.4 45.8 33.1 44.7 35.4

Level of Service D C D C D C D D

Approach Delay (s) 31.0 34.3 34.3 35.9

Approach LOS C C C D

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 33.9 HCM Level of Service C

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.9 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.7% ICU Level of Service C

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 22: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

13: Monterey & 280 Ramps 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 215 334 6 158 895 284 2 96 94 173 74 284

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87

Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frt 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85

Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00

Satd. Flow (prot) 1557 3245 3293 1799 1531 1740 1338

Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00

Satd. Flow (perm) 1557 3245 3293 1799 1531 1740 1338

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95

Adj. Flow (vph) 226 352 6 166 942 299 2 101 99 182 78 299

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 22 0 0 0 90 0 0 256

Lane Group Flow (vph) 190 393 0 0 1385 0 0 103 9 0 260 43

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10

Turn Type Split Split Split Perm Split Perm

Protected Phases 2 2 6 6 8 8 4 4

Permitted Phases 8 4

Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0

Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.45 0.09 0.09 0.15 0.15

Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 255 531 1497 164 139 253 195

v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.12 c0.42 c0.06 c0.15

v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.03

v/c Ratio 0.75 0.74 0.92 0.63 0.06 1.03 0.22

Uniform Delay, d1 43.8 43.8 28.2 48.2 45.7 47.0 41.5

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 17.9 9.0 11.1 16.8 0.9 63.9 2.6

Delay (s) 61.7 52.8 39.4 65.0 46.6 110.9 44.1

Level of Service E D D E D F D

Approach Delay (s) 55.7 39.4 56.0 75.2

Approach LOS E D E E

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 51.3 HCM Level of Service D

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.8% ICU Level of Service E

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 23: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

14: Bosworth & Arlington 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 14

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (veh/h) 33 623 944 78 29 75

Sign Control Free Free Stop

Grade 0% 0% 0%

Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90

Hourly flow rate (vph) 37 692 1049 87 32 83

Pedestrians 50

Lane Width (ft) 11.0

Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0

Percent Blockage 4

Right turn flare (veh)

Median type None None

Median storage veh)

Upstream signal (ft) 364

pX, platoon unblocked

vC, conflicting volume 1186 1562 1142

vC1, stage 1 conf vol

vC2, stage 2 conf vol

vCu, unblocked vol 1186 1562 1142

tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9

tC, 2 stage (s)

tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3

p0 queue free % 93 65 55

cM capacity (veh/h) 562 92 187

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 SB 1

Volume Total 37 346 346 1136 116

Volume Left 37 0 0 0 32

Volume Right 0 0 0 87 83

cSH 562 1700 1700 1700 145

Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.67 0.80

Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 0 0 0 125

Control Delay (s) 11.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 88.7

Lane LOS B F

Approach Delay (s) 0.6 0.0 88.7

Approach LOS F

Intersection Summary

Average Delay 5.4

Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.6% ICU Level of Service C

Analysis Period (min) 15

Page 24: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

15: Sagamore & San Jose 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 0 90 32 0 767 29 140 89 3 357 497 1035

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.97

Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85

Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00

Satd. Flow (prot) 1801 1509 4874 3319 1791 1711 2981 1352

Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00

Satd. Flow (perm) 1801 1509 4874 3319 1791 1711 2981 1352

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 0 96 34 0 816 31 149 95 3 380 529 1101

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 28 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 96 6 0 843 0 149 96 0 380 1080 550

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 57 22

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 1 2

Turn Type custom Prot Prot custom

Protected Phases 8 5 2 1 6

Permitted Phases 4 4 15

Actuated Green, G (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 7.0 21.0 32.0 44.0 57.0

Effective Green, g (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 7.0 21.0 32.0 44.0 57.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.23 0.36 0.49 0.63

Clearance Time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0

Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 340 285 921 258 418 608 1457 856

v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.04 0.05 0.22 c0.36

v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.00 c0.41

v/c Ratio 0.28 0.02 0.92 0.58 0.23 0.62 0.74 0.64

Uniform Delay, d1 31.3 29.7 35.8 40.1 28.0 24.0 18.4 10.2

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.1 15.1 9.1 1.3 4.8 3.4 3.7

Delay (s) 33.3 29.9 50.9 49.2 29.2 28.8 21.9 13.9

Level of Service C C D D C C C B

Approach Delay (s) 32.4 50.9 41.3 21.0

Approach LOS C D D C

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 30.8 HCM Level of Service C

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.2% ICU Level of Service E

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 25: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

16: Alemany & I-280 On-Ramp 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 16

Movement EBL EBT EBR EBR2 WBL WBR2 NBT NBR NBR2 SBT NWR2

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 268 589 3 11 256 164 222 303 12 485 39

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93

Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.86

Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3419 1531 3305 1496 4916 1531 1531 4916 1452

Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 3419 1531 1473 1496 4916 1531 1531 4916 1452

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98

Adj. Flow (vph) 273 601 3 11 261 167 227 309 12 495 40

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 7 0 115 0 0 0 0 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 273 604 0 4 261 52 227 309 12 495 40

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 17

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2

Turn Type custom Perm custom custom Perm Perm custom

Protected Phases 2! 4!

Permitted Phases 7! 2 3 6 4 4 4! 6!

Actuated Green, G (s) 43.0 26.0 26.0 14.0 25.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 25.0

Effective Green, g (s) 43.0 26.0 26.0 14.0 25.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 25.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.32 0.32 0.18 0.31 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.31

Clearance Time (s) 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 920 1111 498 258 468 1413 440 440 1413 454

v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.05

v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 0.00 c0.18 0.03 c0.20 0.01 0.10 0.03

v/c Ratio 0.30 0.54 0.01 1.01 0.11 0.16 0.70 0.03 0.35 0.09

Uniform Delay, d1 10.2 22.1 18.3 33.0 19.6 21.3 25.4 20.5 22.6 19.4

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.9 0.0 59.0 0.5 0.2 9.0 0.1 0.7 0.4

Delay (s) 11.0 24.0 18.3 92.0 20.1 21.5 34.5 20.6 23.3 19.8

Level of Service B C B F C C C C C B

Approach Delay (s) 20.0 28.8 23.3

Approach LOS B C C

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 30.5 HCM Level of Service C

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.3% ICU Level of Service E

Analysis Period (min) 15

! Phase conflict between lane groups.

c Critical Lane Group

Page 26: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

17: Seneca & San Jose Ave 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Existing PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 17

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT

Lane Configurations

Volume (veh/h) 50 80 270 64 40 296

Sign Control Stop Free Free

Grade 0% 0% 0%

Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Hourly flow rate (vph) 53 85 287 68 43 315

Pedestrians

Lane Width (ft)

Walking Speed (ft/s)

Percent Blockage

Right turn flare (veh)

Median type None None

Median storage veh)

Upstream signal (ft) 373 584

pX, platoon unblocked

vC, conflicting volume 564 178 355

vC1, stage 1 conf vol

vC2, stage 2 conf vol

vCu, unblocked vol 564 178 355

tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1

tC, 2 stage (s)

tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2

p0 queue free % 88 90 96

cM capacity (veh/h) 440 835 1200

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2

Volume Total 138 191 164 148 210

Volume Left 53 0 0 43 0

Volume Right 85 0 68 0 0

cSH 620 1700 1700 1200 1700

Volume to Capacity 0.22 0.11 0.10 0.04 0.12

Queue Length 95th (ft) 21 0 0 3 0

Control Delay (s) 12.5 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0

Lane LOS B A

Approach Delay (s) 12.5 0.0 1.1

Approach LOS B

Intersection Summary

Average Delay 2.5

Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.5% ICU Level of Service A

Analysis Period (min) 15

Page 27: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Ocean & Geneva Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 1

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 985 0 0 970 462 4Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Grade (%) 5% 5% 0%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.97Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (prot) 3336 3336 3320Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 3336 3336 3320Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 1048 0 0 1032 491 4RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 1048 0 0 1032 494 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100Turn TypeProtected Phases 13 1 8Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 46.0 46.0 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 46.0 46.0 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.32Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1918 1918 1079v/s Ratio Prot c0.31 0.31 c0.15v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.55 0.54 0.46Uniform Delay, d1 10.5 10.5 21.4Progression Factor 0.50 1.70 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.9 0.3Delay (s) 6.1 18.7 21.7Level of Service A B CApproach Delay (s) 6.1 18.7 21.7Approach LOS A B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 28: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2001: Ocean & Phelan 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 18

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 107 833 396 0 1165 469 0 0 0 152 304 110Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Grade (%) 5% 0% 0% 0%Total Lost time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95Frt 1.00 0.95 0.96 0.97Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1668 3175 4704 3277Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99Satd. Flow (perm) 1668 3175 4704 3277Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 114 886 421 0 1239 499 0 0 0 162 323 117RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 71 0 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 26 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 114 1236 0 0 1652 0 0 0 0 0 576 0Turn Type Prot PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4Permitted Phases 4Actuated Green, G (s) 10.4 46.0 32.1 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 10.4 46.0 32.1 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.58 0.40 0.32Clearance Time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 217 1826 1887 1065v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.39 c0.35v/s Ratio Perm 0.18v/c Ratio 0.53 0.68 0.88 0.54Uniform Delay, d1 32.5 11.8 22.1 22.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.12 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 2.0 5.5 0.6Delay (s) 34.8 13.9 30.4 22.7Level of Service C B C CApproach Delay (s) 15.5 30.4 0.0 22.7Approach LOS B C A C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 23.6 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.5% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 29: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Ocean & Howth 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 760 0 0 976 50 48 44 61 50 0 10Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 0.95 0.98Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.96Satd. Flow (prot) 3421 3396 1677 1689Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.74Satd. Flow (perm) 3421 3396 1537 1293Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 0 809 0 0 1038 53 51 47 65 53 0 11RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 30 0 0 7 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 809 0 0 1087 0 0 133 0 0 57 0Turn Type Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 4Permitted Phases 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 45.0 45.0 26.0 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 45.0 45.0 26.0 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.32 0.32Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1924 1910 500 420v/s Ratio Prot 0.24 c0.32v/s Ratio Perm c0.09 0.04v/c Ratio 0.42 0.57 0.27 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 10.0 11.3 20.0 19.1Progression Factor 0.20 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 1.2 1.3 0.7Delay (s) 2.6 12.5 21.3 19.7Level of Service A B C BApproach Delay (s) 2.6 12.5 21.3 19.7Approach LOS A B C B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.6 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.46Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.7% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 30: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: Ocean & I-280 On Ramp 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 3

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 497 416 7 9 532 186 7 0 0 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 1769 872 1614 872Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 1769 872 1614 872Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Adj. Flow (vph) 512 429 7 9 548 192 7 0 0 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 512 436 0 9 730 0 0 7 0 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 100% 100% 2% 2% 100% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot PermProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 14Permitted Phases 14Actuated Green, G (s) 32.9 84.2 2.4 51.7 2.4Effective Green, g (s) 32.9 84.2 2.4 51.7 2.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.84 0.02 0.52 0.02Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 563 1489 21 834 21v/s Ratio Prot c0.30 0.25 0.01 c0.45v/s Ratio Perm 0.01v/c Ratio 0.91 0.29 0.43 0.88 0.33Uniform Delay, d1 32.1 1.7 48.1 21.3 48.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 18.2 0.5 5.0 12.4 3.4Delay (s) 50.3 2.2 53.2 33.8 51.4Level of Service D A D C DApproach Delay (s) 28.2 34.0 51.4 0.0Approach LOS C C D A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 30.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.1% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 31: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: Ocean & San Jose 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 33 348 40 102 475 48 115 255 86 52 286 109Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 0.97Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1783 1148 1532 1735 1620 1669 1656Flt Permitted 0.93 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.91Satd. Flow (perm) 1670 1148 685 1735 651 1669 1519Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 35 370 43 109 505 51 122 271 91 55 304 116RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 13 0 5 0 0 16 0 0 15 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 405 30 109 551 0 122 346 0 0 460 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 29.0 29.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 29.0 29.0 29.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.39 0.39 0.39Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 824 566 338 856 252 645 587v/s Ratio Prot c0.32 0.21v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 0.03 0.16 0.19 c0.30v/c Ratio 0.49 0.05 0.32 0.64 0.48 0.54 0.78Uniform Delay, d1 12.7 9.9 11.4 14.1 17.4 17.8 20.2Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.2 2.5 3.7 6.5 3.2 10.0Delay (s) 14.8 10.1 14.0 17.8 23.9 21.0 30.3Level of Service B B B B C C CApproach Delay (s) 14.3 17.2 21.7 30.3Approach LOS B B C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 20.6 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 116.1% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 32: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: Ocean & Alemany 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 5

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 119 226 42 51 225 75 51 550 52 241 801 215Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88Flpb, ped/bikes 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1625 1729 1618 1687 3402 1175 3353 1351Flt Permitted 0.43 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.65 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 739 1729 813 1687 2633 1175 2217 1351Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 127 240 45 54 239 80 54 585 55 256 852 229RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 15 0 0 0 22 0 0 92Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 276 0 54 304 0 0 639 33 0 1108 137Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Parking (#/hr) 6Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 6 6Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0Effective Green, g (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 249 584 274 569 1415 632 1192 726v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 c0.18v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.07 0.24 0.03 c0.50 0.10v/c Ratio 0.51 0.47 0.20 0.53 0.45 0.05 0.93 0.19Uniform Delay, d1 21.2 20.9 18.8 21.4 11.3 8.8 17.1 9.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 7.3 2.7 1.6 3.6 1.0 0.2 13.9 0.6Delay (s) 28.5 23.6 20.4 25.0 12.3 9.0 31.0 10.1Level of Service C C C C B A C BApproach Delay (s) 25.1 24.3 12.1 27.4Approach LOS C C B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 22.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 133.3% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 33: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: Geneva Ave & Howth 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 23 534 38 361 693 130 0 0 0 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Grade (%) 5% 5% 0% 0%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.95Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.89 1.00Frt 0.99 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3227 1486 3103Flt Permitted 0.91 0.40 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2931 623 3103Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 24 568 40 384 737 138 0 0 0 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 628 0 384 861 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8Permitted Phases 4 8Actuated Green, G (s) 63.2 63.2 63.2Effective Green, g (s) 63.2 63.2 63.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.70Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2058 437 2179v/s Ratio Prot 0.28v/s Ratio Perm 0.21 c0.62v/c Ratio 0.30 0.88 0.40Uniform Delay, d1 5.1 10.4 5.5Progression Factor 1.00 0.97 0.77Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 17.2 0.1Delay (s) 5.2 27.3 4.3Level of Service A C AApproach Delay (s) 5.2 11.3 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A B A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.3 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 26.8Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 34: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: Geneva Ave & I280 SB Off 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 7

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 336 180 476 713 0 0 0 0 487 1 185Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 2887 832 1540 3079 1513 1305Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98Satd. Flow (perm) 2887 832 1540 3079 1513 1305Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Adj. Flow (vph) 0 350 188 496 743 0 0 0 0 507 1 193RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 350 50 496 743 0 0 0 0 360 288 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 30 30Parking (#/hr) 5 5Turn Type Perm Prot PermProtected Phases 2 1 6 4Permitted Phases 2 4Actuated Green, G (s) 24.1 24.1 32.2 59.3 23.7 23.7Effective Green, g (s) 24.1 24.1 32.2 59.3 23.7 23.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.36 0.66 0.26 0.26Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 773 223 551 2029 398 344v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 c0.32 0.24v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.24 0.22v/c Ratio 0.45 0.23 0.90 0.37 0.90 0.84Uniform Delay, d1 27.5 25.7 27.4 6.9 32.1 31.3Progression Factor 0.78 1.97 0.91 0.84 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 2.3 15.4 0.4 23.7 16.7Delay (s) 23.2 53.0 40.4 6.2 55.8 48.0Level of Service C D D A E DApproach Delay (s) 33.6 19.9 0.0 52.0Approach LOS C B A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 32.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.6% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 35: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: Geneva Ave & I280 NB On 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 108 730 0 0 709 195 468 5 616 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.87Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.86Flt Protected 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3033 3079 1005 1513 1185Flt Permitted 0.71 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2167 3079 1005 1513 1185Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Adj. Flow (vph) 111 753 0 0 731 201 482 5 635 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 96 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 864 0 0 731 149 434 592 0 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 8Permitted Phases 6 8Actuated Green, G (s) 43.5 43.5 43.5 39.5 39.5Effective Green, g (s) 43.5 43.5 43.5 39.5 39.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.44 0.44Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1047 1488 486 664 520v/s Ratio Prot 0.24v/s Ratio Perm c0.40 0.15 0.29 0.50v/c Ratio 0.83 0.49 0.31 0.65 1.14Uniform Delay, d1 20.0 15.8 14.1 19.9 25.2Progression Factor 1.53 0.42 0.15 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 4.4 0.7 1.0 3.1 83.6Delay (s) 35.0 7.4 3.1 23.0 108.8Level of Service C A A C FApproach Delay (s) 35.0 6.5 75.6 0.0Approach LOS C A E A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 41.5 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 7.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.6% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 36: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: Geneva Ave & San Jose Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 186 962 159 23 622 64 83 148 29 33 130 183Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.80Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.91Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1512 2870 1462 2842 2825 1168 1013Flt Permitted 0.18 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.73 0.58 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 282 2870 239 2842 2093 716 1013Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 198 1023 169 24 662 68 88 157 31 35 138 195RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 198 1179 0 24 730 0 0 267 0 35 333 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 400 400 400 400 400 400 400Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 30 30 10 10Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 6 0 6 6 0 6 0 0 6 0Parking (#/hr) 5 5Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 39.8 39.8 27.3 27.3 39.7 39.7 39.7Effective Green, g (s) 39.8 39.8 27.3 27.3 39.7 39.7 39.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.44 0.30 0.30 0.44 0.44 0.44Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 227 1269 72 862 923 316 447v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.41 0.26 c0.33v/s Ratio Perm 0.31 0.10 0.13 0.05v/c Ratio 0.87 0.93 0.33 0.85 0.29 0.11 0.74Uniform Delay, d1 18.6 23.8 24.3 29.4 16.1 14.8 20.9Progression Factor 1.20 1.19 0.79 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.6 1.6 10.6 8.9 0.2 0.2 6.6Delay (s) 26.1 29.8 29.6 33.2 16.3 14.9 27.6Level of Service C C C C B B CApproach Delay (s) 29.3 33.1 16.3 26.4Approach LOS C C B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 28.7 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 127.8% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 37: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: Geneva Ave & San Jose Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 10

Movement SERLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900Total Lost time (s)Lane Util. FactorFrpb, ped/bikesFlpb, ped/bikesFrtFlt ProtectedSatd. Flow (prot)Flt PermittedSatd. Flow (perm)Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 400Confl. Bikes (#/hr)Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0Parking (#/hr)Turn Type customProtected PhasesPermitted Phases 13Actuated Green, G (s)Effective Green, g (s)Actuated g/C RatioClearance Time (s)Vehicle Extension (s)Lane Grp Cap (vph)v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Permv/c RatioUniform Delay, d1Progression FactorIncremental Delay, d2Delay (s)Level of ServiceApproach Delay (s)Approach LOS

Intersection Summary

Page 38: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: Geneva Ave & Cayuga Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 11

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 59 767 46 61 643 50 57 39 61 26 64 63Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99Frt 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.94Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 2843 2810 1288 1303Flt Permitted 0.84 0.81 0.85 0.94Satd. Flow (perm) 2407 2275 1114 1229Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Adj. Flow (vph) 61 799 48 64 670 52 59 41 64 27 67 66RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 27 0 0 29 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 904 0 0 781 0 0 137 0 0 131 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0Parking (#/hr) 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 59.7 59.7 22.3 22.3Effective Green, g (s) 59.7 59.7 22.3 22.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.25 0.25Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1597 1509 276 305v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.38 0.34 c0.12 0.11v/c Ratio 0.57 0.52 0.50 0.43Uniform Delay, d1 8.2 7.8 29.0 28.5Progression Factor 1.96 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 1.3 1.4 1.0Delay (s) 16.7 9.0 30.4 29.5Level of Service B A C CApproach Delay (s) 16.7 9.0 30.4 29.5Approach LOS B A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 15.8 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 39: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: Geneva Ave & Alemany 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 12

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 131 616 83 107 533 267 79 547 247 49 664 102Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3360 1711 3250 1711 3262 1711 3353Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 3360 1711 3250 1711 3262 1711 3353Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 139 655 88 114 567 284 84 582 263 52 706 109RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 7 0 0 45 0 0 45 0 0 11 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 139 736 0 114 806 0 84 800 0 52 804 0Turn Type Prot Prot Prot ProtProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 13.2 31.5 12.1 30.4 8.6 30.3 7.0 28.7Effective Green, g (s) 13.2 31.5 12.1 30.4 8.6 30.3 7.0 28.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.33 0.13 0.32 0.09 0.32 0.07 0.30Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 236 1104 216 1030 153 1031 125 1003v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.22 0.07 c0.25 0.05 c0.25 0.03 c0.24v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.59 0.67 0.53 0.78 0.55 0.78 0.42 0.80Uniform Delay, d1 38.8 27.7 39.2 29.7 41.8 29.7 42.5 31.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.7 1.2 2.3 3.6 4.0 3.4 2.2 4.4Delay (s) 42.5 28.9 41.5 33.4 45.8 33.1 44.7 35.4Level of Service D C D C D C D DApproach Delay (s) 31.0 34.3 34.3 35.9Approach LOS C C C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 33.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.9 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.7% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 40: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis13: Monterey & 280 Ramps 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 215 334 6 158 895 284 2 96 94 173 74 284Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1557 3245 3293 1799 1531 1740 1338Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1557 3245 3293 1799 1531 1740 1338Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Adj. Flow (vph) 226 352 6 166 942 299 2 101 99 182 78 299RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 22 0 0 0 90 0 0 256Lane Group Flow (vph) 190 393 0 0 1385 0 0 103 9 0 260 43Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type Split Split Split Perm Split PermProtected Phases 2 2 6 6 8 8 4 4Permitted Phases 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.45 0.09 0.09 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 255 531 1497 164 139 253 195v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.12 c0.42 c0.06 c0.15v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.03v/c Ratio 0.75 0.74 0.92 0.63 0.06 1.03 0.22Uniform Delay, d1 43.8 43.8 28.2 48.2 45.7 47.0 41.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 17.9 9.0 11.1 16.8 0.9 63.9 2.6Delay (s) 61.7 52.8 39.4 65.0 46.6 110.9 44.1Level of Service E D D E D F DApproach Delay (s) 55.7 39.4 56.0 75.2Approach LOS E D E E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 51.3 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.8% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 41: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis14: Bosworth & Arlington 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 14

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 33 623 359 174 944 78 0 0 0 29 0 75Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Hourly flow rate (vph) 37 692 399 193 1049 87 0 0 0 32 0 83Pedestrians 50 50Lane Width (ft) 0.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 0 4Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 364pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 1186 1141 2534 2587 596 1948 2743 1142vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1186 1141 2534 2587 596 1948 2743 1142tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 93 68 100 100 100 0 100 55cM capacity (veh/h) 562 608 5 15 447 26 12 187

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1Volume Total 37 461 630 193 1136 116Volume Left 37 0 0 193 0 32Volume Right 0 0 399 0 87 83cSH 562 1700 1700 608 1700 69Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.27 0.37 0.32 0.67 1.69Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 0 0 34 0 254Control Delay (s) 11.8 0.0 0.0 13.7 0.0 464.4Lane LOS B B FApproach Delay (s) 0.4 2.0 464.4Approach LOS F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 22.1Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.3% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 42: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: Sagamore & San Jose 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 90 32 0 767 29 140 89 3 357 497 1035Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1801 1509 4874 3319 1791 1711 2981 1352Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1801 1509 4874 3319 1791 1711 2981 1352Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 0 96 34 0 816 31 149 95 3 380 529 1101RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 28 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 96 6 0 843 0 149 96 0 380 1080 550Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 57 22Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 1 2Turn Type custom Prot Prot customProtected Phases 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 15Actuated Green, G (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 7.0 21.0 32.0 44.0 57.0Effective Green, g (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 7.0 21.0 32.0 44.0 57.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.23 0.36 0.49 0.63Clearance Time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 340 285 921 258 418 608 1457 856v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.04 0.05 0.22 c0.36v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.00 c0.41v/c Ratio 0.28 0.02 0.92 0.58 0.23 0.62 0.74 0.64Uniform Delay, d1 31.3 29.7 35.8 40.1 28.0 24.0 18.4 10.2Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.1 15.1 9.1 1.3 4.8 3.4 3.7Delay (s) 33.3 29.9 50.9 49.2 29.2 28.8 21.9 13.9Level of Service C C D D C C C BApproach Delay (s) 32.4 50.9 41.3 21.0Approach LOS C D D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 30.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.2% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 43: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: Alemany & I-280 On-Ramp 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 16

Movement EBL EBT EBR EBR2 WBL WBR2 NBT NBR NBR2 SBT NWR2Lane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 268 589 3 11 256 164 222 303 12 485 39Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.86Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3419 1531 3305 1496 4916 1531 1531 4916 1452Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 3419 1531 1473 1496 4916 1531 1531 4916 1452Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98Adj. Flow (vph) 273 601 3 11 261 167 227 309 12 495 40RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 7 0 115 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 273 604 0 4 261 52 227 309 12 495 40Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 17Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2Turn Type custom Perm custom custom Perm Perm customProtected Phases 2! 4!Permitted Phases 7! 2 3 6 4 4 4! 6!Actuated Green, G (s) 43.0 26.0 26.0 14.0 25.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 25.0Effective Green, g (s) 43.0 26.0 26.0 14.0 25.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 25.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.32 0.32 0.18 0.31 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.31Clearance Time (s) 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 920 1111 498 258 468 1413 440 440 1413 454v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.05v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 0.00 c0.18 0.03 c0.20 0.01 0.10 0.03v/c Ratio 0.30 0.54 0.01 1.01 0.11 0.16 0.70 0.03 0.35 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 10.2 22.1 18.3 33.0 19.6 21.3 25.4 20.5 22.6 19.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.9 0.0 59.0 0.5 0.2 9.0 0.1 0.7 0.4Delay (s) 11.0 24.0 18.3 92.0 20.1 21.5 34.5 20.6 23.3 19.8Level of Service B C B F C C C C C BApproach Delay (s) 20.0 28.8 23.3Approach LOS B C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 30.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.3% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15! Phase conflict between lane groups.c Critical Lane Group

Page 44: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis17: Seneca & San Jose Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Baseline PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 17

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 50 80 270 64 40 296Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Hourly flow rate (vph) 53 85 287 68 43 315PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 373 584pX, platoon unblocked 0.91 0.91 0.91vC, conflicting volume 721 321 355vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 645 206 243tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 86 89 96cM capacity (veh/h) 384 760 1205

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 138 355 28 329Volume Left 53 0 28 14Volume Right 85 68 0 0cSH 552 1700 1205 1205Volume to Capacity 0.25 0.21 0.04 0.04Queue Length 95th (ft) 25 0 3 3Control Delay (s) 13.7 0.0 8.1 0.7Lane LOS B A AApproach Delay (s) 13.7 0.0 1.3Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.8Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 45: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Ocean & Geneva Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 1

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 1093 0 0 970 462 4Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Grade (%) 5% 5% 0%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.97Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (prot) 3336 3336 3320Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 3336 3336 3320Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 1163 0 0 1032 491 4RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 1163 0 0 1032 494 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100Turn TypeProtected Phases 13 1 8Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 46.0 46.0 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 46.0 46.0 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.32Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1918 1918 1079v/s Ratio Prot c0.35 0.31 c0.15v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.61 0.54 0.46Uniform Delay, d1 11.1 10.5 21.4Progression Factor 0.54 1.70 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.9 0.3Delay (s) 7.0 18.7 21.7Level of Service A B CApproach Delay (s) 7.0 18.7 21.7Approach LOS A B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 46: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2001: Ocean & Phelan 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 18

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 107 894 335 0 1165 469 0 0 0 199 257 110Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Grade (%) 5% 0% 0% 0%Total Lost time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95Frt 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.97Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1668 3199 4704 3264Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (perm) 1668 3199 4704 3264Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 114 951 356 0 1239 499 0 0 0 212 273 117RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 48 0 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 26 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 114 1259 0 0 1652 0 0 0 0 0 576 0Turn Type Prot PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4Permitted Phases 4Actuated Green, G (s) 10.4 46.0 32.1 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 10.4 46.0 32.1 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.58 0.40 0.32Clearance Time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 217 1839 1887 1061v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.39 c0.35v/s Ratio Perm 0.18v/c Ratio 0.53 0.68 0.88 0.54Uniform Delay, d1 32.5 11.9 22.1 22.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.12 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 2.1 5.5 0.6Delay (s) 34.8 14.0 30.4 22.7Level of Service C B C CApproach Delay (s) 15.7 30.4 0.0 22.7Approach LOS B C A C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 23.6 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.5% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 47: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Ocean & Howth 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 868 0 0 976 50 48 44 61 50 0 10Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 0.95 0.98Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.96Satd. Flow (prot) 1801 3396 1677 1689Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.74Satd. Flow (perm) 1801 3396 1537 1293Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 0 923 0 0 1038 53 51 47 65 53 0 11RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 30 0 0 7 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 923 0 0 1087 0 0 133 0 0 57 0Turn Type Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 4Permitted Phases 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 45.0 45.0 26.0 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 45.0 45.0 26.0 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.32 0.32Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1013 1910 500 420v/s Ratio Prot c0.51 0.32v/s Ratio Perm c0.09 0.04v/c Ratio 0.91 0.57 0.27 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 15.7 11.3 20.0 19.1Progression Factor 0.57 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 11.3 1.2 1.3 0.7Delay (s) 20.3 12.5 21.3 19.7Level of Service C B C BApproach Delay (s) 20.3 12.5 21.3 19.7Approach LOS C B C B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 16.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.9% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 48: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: Ocean & I-280 On Ramp 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 3

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 605 416 7 9 532 362 7 0 0 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.61 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 1769 872 1801 936 1711Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 1769 872 1801 936 1711Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Adj. Flow (vph) 624 429 7 9 548 373 7 0 0 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 624 436 0 9 548 333 0 7 0 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 14Permitted Phases 6 14Actuated Green, G (s) 59.8 140.2 2.4 80.8 80.8 2.4Effective Green, g (s) 59.8 140.2 2.4 80.8 80.8 2.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.90 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.02Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 3.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 656 1590 13 933 485 26v/s Ratio Prot c0.36 0.25 0.01 0.30v/s Ratio Perm c0.36 0.00v/c Ratio 0.95 0.27 0.69 0.59 0.69 0.27Uniform Delay, d1 46.7 1.1 76.4 26.1 28.1 75.9Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 23.5 0.4 82.4 2.7 7.7 2.0Delay (s) 70.2 1.5 158.8 28.8 35.8 78.0Level of Service E A F C D EApproach Delay (s) 41.9 32.9 78.0 0.0Approach LOS D C E A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 37.8 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79Actuated Cycle Length (s) 156.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.6% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 49: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: Ocean & San Jose 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 33 348 40 102 475 48 291 255 86 52 286 109Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 0.97Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1784 1195 1556 1740 1626 1676 1664Flt Permitted 0.84 1.00 0.39 1.00 0.43 1.00 0.92Satd. Flow (perm) 1503 1195 635 1740 735 1676 1544Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 35 370 43 109 505 51 310 271 91 55 304 116RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 15 0 6 0 0 19 0 0 18 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 405 28 109 550 0 310 343 0 0 457 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 29.0 29.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 29.0 29.0 29.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.45 0.45 0.45Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 624 496 264 723 328 748 689v/s Ratio Prot c0.32 0.20v/s Ratio Perm 0.27 0.02 0.17 c0.42 0.30v/c Ratio 0.65 0.06 0.41 0.76 0.95 0.46 0.66Uniform Delay, d1 15.2 11.4 13.4 16.2 17.2 12.5 14.2Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 5.2 0.2 4.7 7.4 37.5 2.0 5.0Delay (s) 20.4 11.6 18.1 23.7 54.8 14.6 19.2Level of Service C B B C D B BApproach Delay (s) 19.5 22.7 33.1 19.2Approach LOS B C C B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 24.4 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 116.1% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 50: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: Ocean & Alemany 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 5

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 119 226 42 51 225 75 51 569 52 241 801 215Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88Flpb, ped/bikes 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1625 1729 1618 1687 3403 1175 3354 1351Flt Permitted 0.43 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.65 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 739 1729 813 1687 2642 1175 2194 1351Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 127 240 45 54 239 80 54 605 55 256 852 229RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 15 0 0 0 21 0 0 92Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 276 0 54 304 0 0 659 34 0 1108 137Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Parking (#/hr) 6Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 6 6Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0Effective Green, g (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 249 584 274 569 1420 632 1179 726v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 c0.18v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.07 0.25 0.03 c0.50 0.10v/c Ratio 0.51 0.47 0.20 0.53 0.46 0.05 0.94 0.19Uniform Delay, d1 21.2 20.9 18.8 21.4 11.4 8.8 17.3 9.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 7.3 2.7 1.6 3.6 1.1 0.2 15.2 0.6Delay (s) 28.5 23.6 20.4 25.0 12.5 9.0 32.5 10.1Level of Service C C C C B A C BApproach Delay (s) 25.1 24.3 12.2 28.7Approach LOS C C B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 23.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 133.3% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 51: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: Geneva Ave & Howth 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 23 426 38 361 693 130 0 0 0 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Grade (%) 5% 5% 0% 0%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.95Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.87 1.00Frt 0.99 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3203 1445 3103Flt Permitted 0.90 0.46 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2884 692 3103Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 24 453 40 384 737 138 0 0 0 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 511 0 384 861 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8Permitted Phases 4 8Actuated Green, G (s) 63.2 63.2 63.2Effective Green, g (s) 63.2 63.2 63.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.70Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2025 486 2179v/s Ratio Prot 0.28v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 c0.55v/c Ratio 0.25 0.79 0.40Uniform Delay, d1 4.9 9.0 5.5Progression Factor 1.00 0.81 0.76Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 8.2 0.1Delay (s) 4.9 15.4 4.3Level of Service A B AApproach Delay (s) 4.9 7.7 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A A A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 6.9 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 26.8Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 52: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: Geneva Ave & I280 SB Off 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 7

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 228 180 476 713 0 0 0 0 487 1 185Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.68 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 2887 820 1540 3079 1513 1305Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98Satd. Flow (perm) 2887 820 1540 3079 1513 1305Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Adj. Flow (vph) 0 238 188 496 743 0 0 0 0 507 1 193RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 238 38 496 743 0 0 0 0 360 289 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 30 30Parking (#/hr) 5 5Turn Type Perm Prot PermProtected Phases 2 1 6 4Permitted Phases 2 4Actuated Green, G (s) 18.3 18.3 35.0 56.3 26.7 26.7Effective Green, g (s) 18.3 18.3 35.0 56.3 26.7 26.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.39 0.63 0.30 0.30Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 587 167 599 1926 449 387v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.32 c0.24v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 c0.24 0.22v/c Ratio 0.41 0.23 0.83 0.39 0.80 0.75Uniform Delay, d1 31.1 30.0 24.8 8.3 29.2 28.6Progression Factor 0.87 2.12 0.72 0.38 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 3.1 9.9 0.5 14.0 12.4Delay (s) 29.3 66.5 27.8 3.6 43.2 41.0Level of Service C E C A D DApproach Delay (s) 45.7 13.3 0.0 42.1Approach LOS D B A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 27.7 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 116.4% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 53: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: Geneva Ave & I280 NB Off 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 8

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 730 0 0 709 468 616Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 12 12Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3079 3079 1593 1219Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3079 3079 1593 1219Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Adj. Flow (vph) 753 0 0 731 482 635RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 18Lane Group Flow (vph) 753 0 0 731 482 617Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10Turn Type customProtected Phases 2 6Permitted Phases 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 28.5 28.5 54.5 54.5Effective Green, g (s) 28.5 28.5 54.5 54.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 0.32 0.61 0.61Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 975 975 965 738v/s Ratio Prot c0.24 0.24v/s Ratio Perm 0.30 c0.51v/c Ratio 0.77 0.75 0.50 0.84Uniform Delay, d1 27.8 27.6 10.0 14.2Progression Factor 1.23 0.83 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 4.5 3.1 1.8 10.9Delay (s) 38.6 26.0 11.9 25.1Level of Service D C B CApproach Delay (s) 38.6 26.0 19.4Approach LOS D C B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 26.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 7.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 116.4% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 54: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: Geneva Ave & San Jose Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR2 NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 186 962 159 23 452 215 58 173 29 33 130 183Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.82 0.96 1.00 0.80Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 0.98 1.00 0.91Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1503 2870 1463 2369 2839 1169 1013Flt Permitted 0.21 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.81 0.58 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 333 2870 240 2369 2325 716 1013Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 198 1023 169 24 481 229 62 184 31 35 138 195RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 0 0 63 0 0 9 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 198 1184 0 24 647 0 0 268 0 35 333 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 400 400 400 400 400 400 400Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 30 30 10 10Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 6 0Parking (#/hr) 5 5Turn Type pm+pt Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 6Actuated Green, G (s) 41.0 41.0 30.0 30.0 38.5 38.5 38.5Effective Green, g (s) 41.0 41.0 30.0 30.0 38.5 38.5 38.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.46 0.33 0.33 0.43 0.43 0.43Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 230 1307 80 790 995 306 433v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.41 0.27 c0.33v/s Ratio Perm 0.34 0.10 0.12 0.05v/c Ratio 0.86 0.91 0.30 0.82 4.13dl 0.11 0.77Uniform Delay, d1 20.0 22.7 22.2 27.5 16.7 15.5 22.0Progression Factor 1.68 1.56 1.39 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 20.7 6.5 8.3 8.2 0.7 0.8 12.4Delay (s) 54.3 41.9 39.2 42.6 17.3 16.3 34.3Level of Service D D D D B B CApproach Delay (s) 43.6 42.5 17.3 32.6Approach LOS D D B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 39.2 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 127.8% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane.c Critical Lane Group

Page 55: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: Geneva Ave & San Jose Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 10

Movement SERLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900Total Lost time (s)Lane Util. FactorFrpb, ped/bikesFlpb, ped/bikesFrtFlt ProtectedSatd. Flow (prot)Flt PermittedSatd. Flow (perm)Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 400Confl. Bikes (#/hr)Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0Parking (#/hr)Turn Type customProtected PhasesPermitted Phases 13Actuated Green, G (s)Effective Green, g (s)Actuated g/C RatioClearance Time (s)Vehicle Extension (s)Lane Grp Cap (vph)v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Permv/c RatioUniform Delay, d1Progression FactorIncremental Delay, d2Delay (s)Level of ServiceApproach Delay (s)Approach LOS

Intersection Summary

Page 56: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: Geneva Ave & Cayuga Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 11

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 59 767 46 61 624 50 57 39 61 26 64 63Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99Frt 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.94Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 2843 2808 1288 1303Flt Permitted 0.85 0.80 0.85 0.94Satd. Flow (perm) 2415 2267 1114 1229Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Adj. Flow (vph) 61 799 48 64 650 52 59 41 64 27 67 66RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 27 0 0 29 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 904 0 0 761 0 0 137 0 0 131 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0Parking (#/hr) 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 59.7 59.7 22.3 22.3Effective Green, g (s) 59.7 59.7 22.3 22.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.25 0.25Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1602 1504 276 305v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.37 0.34 c0.12 0.11v/c Ratio 0.56 0.51 0.50 0.43Uniform Delay, d1 8.2 7.7 29.0 28.5Progression Factor 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 1.2 1.4 1.0Delay (s) 1.8 8.9 30.4 29.5Level of Service A A C CApproach Delay (s) 1.8 8.9 30.4 29.5Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.1 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.9% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 57: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: Geneva Ave & Alemany 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 12

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 131 616 83 107 520 261 73 553 247 49 664 102Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3360 1711 3250 1711 3263 1711 3353Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 3360 1711 3250 1711 3263 1711 3353Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 139 655 88 114 553 278 78 588 263 52 706 109RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 7 0 0 45 0 0 45 0 0 11 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 139 736 0 114 786 0 78 806 0 52 804 0Turn Type Prot Prot Prot ProtProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 13.2 31.4 12.0 30.2 8.2 29.9 6.9 28.6Effective Green, g (s) 13.2 31.4 12.0 30.2 8.2 29.9 6.9 28.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.33 0.13 0.32 0.09 0.31 0.07 0.30Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 237 1108 216 1031 147 1025 124 1007v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.22 0.07 c0.24 0.05 c0.25 0.03 c0.24v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.59 0.66 0.53 0.76 0.53 0.79 0.42 0.80Uniform Delay, d1 38.4 27.4 38.9 29.3 41.7 29.7 42.2 30.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.7 1.2 2.3 3.0 3.6 3.7 2.3 4.2Delay (s) 42.1 28.5 41.3 32.3 45.3 33.5 44.5 34.8Level of Service D C D C D C D CApproach Delay (s) 30.7 33.4 34.5 35.4Approach LOS C C C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 33.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.2 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.3% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 58: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis13: Monterey & 280 Ramps 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 215 334 6 158 895 284 2 96 94 173 74 284Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1557 3245 3293 1799 1531 1740 1338Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1557 3245 3293 1799 1531 1740 1338Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Adj. Flow (vph) 226 352 6 166 942 299 2 101 99 182 78 299RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 22 0 0 0 90 0 0 256Lane Group Flow (vph) 190 393 0 0 1385 0 0 103 9 0 260 43Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type Split Split Split Perm Split PermProtected Phases 2 2 6 6 8 8 4 4Permitted Phases 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.45 0.09 0.09 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 255 531 1497 164 139 253 195v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.12 c0.42 c0.06 c0.15v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.03v/c Ratio 0.75 0.74 0.92 0.63 0.06 1.03 0.22Uniform Delay, d1 43.8 43.8 28.2 48.2 45.7 47.0 41.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 17.9 9.0 11.1 16.8 0.9 63.9 2.6Delay (s) 61.7 52.8 39.4 65.0 46.6 110.9 44.1Level of Service E D D E D F DApproach Delay (s) 55.7 39.4 56.0 75.2Approach LOS E D E E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 51.3 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.8% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 59: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis14: Bosworth & Arlington 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 14

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 33 623 359 174 944 78 0 0 0 29 0 75Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Hourly flow rate (vph) 37 692 399 193 1049 87 0 0 0 32 0 83Pedestrians 50 50Lane Width (ft) 0.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 0 4Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 364pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 1186 1141 2534 2587 596 1948 2743 1142vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1186 1141 2534 2587 596 1948 2743 1142tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 93 68 100 100 100 0 100 55cM capacity (veh/h) 562 608 5 15 447 26 12 187

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1Volume Total 37 461 630 193 1136 116Volume Left 37 0 0 193 0 32Volume Right 0 0 399 0 87 83cSH 562 1700 1700 608 1700 69Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.27 0.37 0.32 0.67 1.69Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 0 0 34 0 254Control Delay (s) 11.8 0.0 0.0 13.7 0.0 464.4Lane LOS B B FApproach Delay (s) 0.4 2.0 464.4Approach LOS F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 22.1Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.3% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 60: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: Sagamore & San Jose 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 90 32 0 767 29 140 89 3 357 497 1035Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1801 1509 4874 3319 1791 1711 2981 1352Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1801 1509 4874 3319 1791 1711 2981 1352Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 0 96 34 0 816 31 149 95 3 380 529 1101RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 28 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 96 6 0 843 0 149 96 0 380 1080 550Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 57 22Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 1 2Turn Type custom Prot Prot customProtected Phases 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 15Actuated Green, G (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 7.0 21.0 32.0 44.0 57.0Effective Green, g (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 7.0 21.0 32.0 44.0 57.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.23 0.36 0.49 0.63Clearance Time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 340 285 921 258 418 608 1457 856v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.04 0.05 0.22 c0.36v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.00 c0.41v/c Ratio 0.28 0.02 0.92 0.58 0.23 0.62 0.74 0.64Uniform Delay, d1 31.3 29.7 35.8 40.1 28.0 24.0 18.4 10.2Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.1 15.1 9.1 1.3 4.8 3.4 3.7Delay (s) 33.3 29.9 50.9 49.2 29.2 28.8 21.9 13.9Level of Service C C D D C C C BApproach Delay (s) 32.4 50.9 41.3 21.0Approach LOS C D D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 30.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.2% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 61: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: Alemany & I-280 On-Ramp 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 16

Movement EBL EBT EBR EBR2 WBL WBR2 NBT NBR NBR2 SBT NWR2Lane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 268 589 3 11 256 164 222 303 12 485 39Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.86Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3419 1531 3305 1496 4916 1531 1531 4916 1452Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 3419 1531 1473 1496 4916 1531 1531 4916 1452Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98Adj. Flow (vph) 273 601 3 11 261 167 227 309 12 495 40RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 7 0 115 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 273 604 0 4 261 52 227 309 12 495 40Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 17Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2Turn Type custom Perm custom custom Perm Perm customProtected Phases 2! 4!Permitted Phases 7! 2 3 6 4 4 4! 6!Actuated Green, G (s) 43.0 26.0 26.0 14.0 25.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 25.0Effective Green, g (s) 43.0 26.0 26.0 14.0 25.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 25.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.32 0.32 0.18 0.31 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.31Clearance Time (s) 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 920 1111 498 258 468 1413 440 440 1413 454v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.05v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 0.00 c0.18 0.03 c0.20 0.01 0.10 0.03v/c Ratio 0.30 0.54 0.01 1.01 0.11 0.16 0.70 0.03 0.35 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 10.2 22.1 18.3 33.0 19.6 21.3 25.4 20.5 22.6 19.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.9 0.0 59.0 0.5 0.2 9.0 0.1 0.7 0.4Delay (s) 11.0 24.0 18.3 92.0 20.1 21.5 34.5 20.6 23.3 19.8Level of Service B C B F C C C C C BApproach Delay (s) 20.0 28.8 23.3Approach LOS B C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 30.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.3% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15! Phase conflict between lane groups.c Critical Lane Group

Page 62: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis17: Seneca & San Jose Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 1 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 17

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 50 80 446 64 40 296Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Hourly flow rate (vph) 53 85 474 68 43 315PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 373 584pX, platoon unblocked 0.92 0.92 0.92vC, conflicting volume 909 509 543vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 859 426 463tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 82 85 96cM capacity (veh/h) 289 580 1014

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 138 543 28 329Volume Left 53 0 28 14Volume Right 85 68 0 0cSH 418 1700 1014 1014Volume to Capacity 0.33 0.32 0.04 0.04Queue Length 95th (ft) 36 0 3 3Control Delay (s) 17.8 0.0 8.7 0.8Lane LOS C A AApproach Delay (s) 17.8 0.0 1.4Approach LOS C

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.9Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 63: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Ocean & Geneva Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 1

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 985 0 0 970 462 4Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Grade (%) 5% 5% 0%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.97Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (prot) 3336 3336 3310Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 3336 3336 3310Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 1048 0 0 1032 491 4RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 1048 0 0 1032 494 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 400 100 100 400Turn TypeProtected Phases 13 1 8Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 46.0 46.0 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 46.0 46.0 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.32Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1918 1918 1076v/s Ratio Prot c0.31 0.31 c0.15v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.55 0.54 0.46Uniform Delay, d1 10.5 10.5 21.4Progression Factor 0.50 1.70 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.9 0.3Delay (s) 6.1 18.7 21.7Level of Service A B CApproach Delay (s) 6.1 18.7 21.7Approach LOS A B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.2 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 64: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2001: Ocean & Phelan 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 107 833 396 0 1165 469 0 0 0 152 304 110Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Grade (%) 5% 0% 0% 0%Total Lost time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95Frt 1.00 0.95 0.96 0.97Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1668 3175 4704 3277Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99Satd. Flow (perm) 1668 3175 4704 3277Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 114 886 421 0 1239 499 0 0 0 162 323 117RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 71 0 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 26 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 114 1236 0 0 1652 0 0 0 0 0 576 0Turn Type Prot PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4Permitted Phases 4Actuated Green, G (s) 10.4 46.0 32.1 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 10.4 46.0 32.1 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.58 0.40 0.32Clearance Time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 217 1826 1887 1065v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.39 c0.35v/s Ratio Perm 0.18v/c Ratio 0.53 0.68 0.88 0.54Uniform Delay, d1 32.5 11.8 22.1 22.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.12 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 2.0 5.5 0.6Delay (s) 34.8 13.9 30.4 22.7Level of Service C B C CApproach Delay (s) 15.5 30.4 0.0 22.7Approach LOS B C A C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 23.6 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.5% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 65: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Ocean & Howth 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 760 0 0 976 50 48 44 61 50 0 10Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 0.95 0.98Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.96Satd. Flow (prot) 3421 3396 1677 1689Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.74Satd. Flow (perm) 3421 3396 1537 1293Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 0 809 0 0 1038 53 51 47 65 53 0 11RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 30 0 0 7 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 809 0 0 1087 0 0 133 0 0 57 0Turn Type Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 4Permitted Phases 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 45.0 45.0 26.0 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 45.0 45.0 26.0 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.32 0.32Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1924 1910 500 420v/s Ratio Prot 0.24 c0.32v/s Ratio Perm c0.09 0.04v/c Ratio 0.42 0.57 0.27 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 10.0 11.3 20.0 19.1Progression Factor 0.20 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 1.2 1.3 0.7Delay (s) 2.6 12.5 21.3 19.7Level of Service A B C BApproach Delay (s) 2.6 12.5 21.3 19.7Approach LOS A B C B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.6 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.46Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.7% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 66: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Ocean & 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 3

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 871 539 0 105 487Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3421 1801 1711 1531Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3421 1801 1711 1531Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 0 927 573 0 112 518RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 106Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 927 573 0 112 412Turn Type PermProtected Phases 4 8 6Permitted Phases 6Actuated Green, G (s) 42.4 42.4 59.6 59.6Effective Green, g (s) 42.4 42.4 59.6 59.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.39 0.54 0.54Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1319 694 927 830v/s Ratio Prot 0.27 c0.32 0.07v/s Ratio Perm c0.27v/c Ratio 0.70 0.83 0.12 0.50Uniform Delay, d1 28.5 30.5 12.4 15.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 7.9 0.3 2.1Delay (s) 30.2 38.4 12.6 17.9Level of Service C D B BApproach Delay (s) 30.2 38.4 17.0Approach LOS C D B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 28.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 67: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: Ocean & I-280 On Ramp 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 497 521 7 9 532 186 7 0 0 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 1775 872 1568 872Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 1775 872 1568 872Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Adj. Flow (vph) 512 537 7 9 548 192 7 0 0 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 512 544 0 9 733 0 0 7 0 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 100% 100% 2% 2% 100% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot PermProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 14Permitted Phases 14Actuated Green, G (s) 49.0 126.2 2.4 77.6 5.4Effective Green, g (s) 49.0 126.2 2.4 77.6 5.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.87 0.02 0.54 0.04Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 578 1545 14 839 32v/s Ratio Prot c0.30 0.31 0.01 c0.47v/s Ratio Perm 0.01v/c Ratio 0.89 0.35 0.64 0.87 0.22Uniform Delay, d1 45.4 1.8 70.9 29.4 67.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 14.7 0.6 56.8 12.2 1.3Delay (s) 60.1 2.4 127.7 41.6 69.0Level of Service E A F D EApproach Delay (s) 30.4 42.7 69.0 0.0Approach LOS C D E A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 35.6 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85Actuated Cycle Length (s) 145.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.6% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 68: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: Ocean & San Jose 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 5

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 109 363 55 102 475 48 115 211 71 52 286 109Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 0.97 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.99Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.97 0.97Flt Protected 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1754 1301 1631 1735 3146 1656Flt Permitted 0.60 1.00 0.34 1.00 0.64 0.91Satd. Flow (perm) 1070 1301 585 1735 2033 1510Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 116 386 59 109 505 51 122 224 76 55 304 116RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 15 0 5 0 0 25 0 0 15 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 502 44 109 551 0 0 397 0 0 460 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 29.0 29.0Effective Green, g (s) 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 29.0 29.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.39 0.39Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 528 642 289 856 786 584v/s Ratio Prot 0.32v/s Ratio Perm c0.47 0.03 0.19 0.20 c0.30v/c Ratio 0.95 0.07 0.38 0.64 0.50 0.79Uniform Delay, d1 18.1 10.0 11.8 14.1 17.5 20.3Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 28.7 0.2 3.7 3.7 2.3 10.3Delay (s) 46.8 10.2 15.5 17.8 19.8 30.6Level of Service D B B B B CApproach Delay (s) 43.0 17.4 19.8 30.6Approach LOS D B B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 27.6 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 118.8% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 69: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: Ocean & Alemany 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 119 226 42 51 225 75 51 550 52 241 801 215Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88Flpb, ped/bikes 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1625 1729 1618 1687 3402 1175 3353 1351Flt Permitted 0.43 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.65 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 739 1729 813 1687 2633 1175 2217 1351Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 127 240 45 54 239 80 54 585 55 256 852 229RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 15 0 0 0 22 0 0 92Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 276 0 54 304 0 0 639 33 0 1108 137Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Parking (#/hr) 6Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 6 6Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0Effective Green, g (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 249 584 274 569 1415 632 1192 726v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 c0.18v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.07 0.24 0.03 c0.50 0.10v/c Ratio 0.51 0.47 0.20 0.53 0.45 0.05 0.93 0.19Uniform Delay, d1 21.2 20.9 18.8 21.4 11.3 8.8 17.1 9.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 7.3 2.7 1.6 3.6 1.0 0.2 13.9 0.6Delay (s) 28.5 23.6 20.4 25.0 12.3 9.0 31.0 10.1Level of Service C C C C B A C BApproach Delay (s) 25.1 24.3 12.1 27.4Approach LOS C C B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 22.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 133.3% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 70: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: Geneva Ave & Howth 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 7

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 23 534 38 361 693 130 0 0 0 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Grade (%) 5% 5% 0% 0%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.95Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.88 1.00Frt 0.99 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3225 1473 3104Flt Permitted 0.91 0.41 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2935 639 3104Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 24 568 40 384 737 138 0 0 0 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 632 0 384 875 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8Permitted Phases 4 8Actuated Green, G (s) 90.0 90.0 90.0Effective Green, g (s) 90.0 90.0 90.0Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2935 639 3104v/s Ratio Prot 0.28v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 c0.60v/c Ratio 0.22 0.60 0.28Uniform Delay, d1 0.0 0.0 0.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 1.3 0.0Delay (s) 0.0 1.3 0.0Level of Service A A AApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A A A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 0.3 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 0.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 71: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: Geneva Ave & I280 SB Off 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 336 180 476 713 0 0 0 0 414 1 185Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.90Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Frt 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.90Flt Protected 1.00 0.98 0.95 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 2446 2961 1513 1278Flt Permitted 1.00 0.57 0.95 0.98Satd. Flow (perm) 2446 1724 1513 1278Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Adj. Flow (vph) 0 350 188 496 743 0 0 0 0 431 1 193RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 459 0 0 1239 0 0 0 0 323 232 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 30 30Parking (#/hr) 5 5Turn Type pm+pt PermProtected Phases 2 1 6 4Permitted Phases 6 4Actuated Green, G (s) 31.5 63.5 19.5 19.5Effective Green, g (s) 31.5 63.5 19.5 19.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.71 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 856 1615 328 277v/s Ratio Prot 0.19 c0.25v/s Ratio Perm c0.29 c0.21 0.18v/c Ratio 0.54 0.77 0.98 0.84Uniform Delay, d1 23.4 8.5 35.1 33.7Progression Factor 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 2.0 46.0 24.8Delay (s) 25.8 3.6 81.1 58.5Level of Service C A F EApproach Delay (s) 25.8 3.6 0.0 70.2Approach LOS C A A E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 25.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 7.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.0% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 72: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: Geneva Ave & I280 NB On 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 108 657 0 0 709 195 468 5 616 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.87Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.86Flt Protected 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3058 3042 974 1513 1185Flt Permitted 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1671 3042 974 1513 1185Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Adj. Flow (vph) 111 677 0 0 731 201 482 5 635 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 120 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 788 0 0 731 160 434 568 0 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0Turn Type custom Perm PermProtected Phases 2 6 8Permitted Phases 5 6 8Actuated Green, G (s) 47.0 24.5 24.5 36.0 36.0Effective Green, g (s) 47.0 24.5 24.5 36.0 36.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.27 0.27 0.40 0.40Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 873 828 265 605 474v/s Ratio Prot 0.24v/s Ratio Perm c0.47 0.16 0.29 0.48v/c Ratio 1.54dl 0.88 0.60 0.72 1.20Uniform Delay, d1 19.4 31.4 28.5 22.7 27.0Progression Factor 0.82 0.77 0.66 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 9.5 9.8 7.0 7.1 108.2Delay (s) 25.4 33.8 25.8 29.9 135.2Level of Service C C C C FApproach Delay (s) 25.4 32.1 94.4 0.0Approach LOS C C F A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 54.9 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.03Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 7.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.4% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.c Critical Lane Group

Page 73: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: Geneva Ave & San Jose Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 10

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 113 962 159 23 622 64 83 148 29 33 130 183Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 0.82Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.92Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1520 2870 1463 2842 2825 2096Flt Permitted 0.20 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.74 0.90Satd. Flow (perm) 320 2870 240 2842 2120 1897Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 120 1023 169 24 662 68 88 157 31 35 138 195RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 120 1184 0 24 730 0 0 267 0 0 368 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 400 400 400 400 400 400 400Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 30 30 10 10Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 6 0 6 6 0 6 0 0 6 0Parking (#/hr) 5 5Turn Type pm+pt Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 6Actuated Green, G (s) 41.0 41.0 30.0 30.0 38.5 38.5Effective Green, g (s) 41.0 41.0 30.0 30.0 38.5 38.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.46 0.33 0.33 0.43 0.43Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 226 1307 80 947 907 811v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.41 0.26v/s Ratio Perm 0.21 0.10 0.13 c0.19v/c Ratio 0.53 0.91 0.30 0.77 5.87dl 0.45Uniform Delay, d1 16.3 22.7 22.2 26.9 16.9 18.3Progression Factor 1.01 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.2 9.4 6.0 0.8 1.8Delay (s) 17.4 22.7 31.6 33.0 17.7 20.1Level of Service B C C C B CApproach Delay (s) 22.2 32.9 17.7 20.1Approach LOS C C B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 24.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 122.3% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane.dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane.c Critical Lane Group

Page 74: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: Geneva Ave & San Jose Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 11

Movement SERLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900Total Lost time (s)Lane Util. FactorFrpb, ped/bikesFlpb, ped/bikesFrtFlt ProtectedSatd. Flow (prot)Flt PermittedSatd. Flow (perm)Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 400Confl. Bikes (#/hr)Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0Parking (#/hr)Turn Type customProtected PhasesPermitted Phases 13Actuated Green, G (s)Effective Green, g (s)Actuated g/C RatioClearance Time (s)Vehicle Extension (s)Lane Grp Cap (vph)v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Permv/c RatioUniform Delay, d1Progression FactorIncremental Delay, d2Delay (s)Level of ServiceApproach Delay (s)Approach LOS

Intersection Summary

Page 75: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: Geneva Ave & Cayuga Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 12

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 59 767 46 61 643 50 57 39 61 26 64 63Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.94Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 2853 2821 1303 1316Flt Permitted 0.85 0.78 0.87 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 2440 2220 1150 1256Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Adj. Flow (vph) 61 799 48 64 670 52 59 41 64 27 67 66RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 7 0 0 9 0 0 35 0 0 36 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 901 0 0 777 0 0 129 0 0 124 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0Parking (#/hr) 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 25.1 25.1 26.9 26.9Effective Green, g (s) 25.1 25.1 26.9 26.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.42 0.45 0.45Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1021 929 516 563v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.37 0.35 c0.11 0.10v/c Ratio 0.88 0.84 0.25 0.22Uniform Delay, d1 16.1 15.6 10.3 10.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 9.1 6.6 1.2 0.9Delay (s) 25.2 22.2 11.4 11.0Level of Service C C B BApproach Delay (s) 25.2 22.2 11.4 11.0Approach LOS C C B B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 21.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.56Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.7% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 76: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: Geneva Ave & Alemany 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 131 616 83 107 533 267 79 547 247 49 664 102Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3360 1711 3250 1711 3262 1711 3353Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 3360 1711 3250 1711 3262 1711 3353Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 139 655 88 114 567 284 84 582 263 52 706 109RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 7 0 0 45 0 0 45 0 0 11 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 139 736 0 114 806 0 84 800 0 52 804 0Turn Type Prot Prot Prot ProtProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 13.2 31.5 12.1 30.4 8.6 30.3 7.0 28.7Effective Green, g (s) 13.2 31.5 12.1 30.4 8.6 30.3 7.0 28.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.33 0.13 0.32 0.09 0.32 0.07 0.30Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 236 1104 216 1030 153 1031 125 1003v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.22 0.07 c0.25 0.05 c0.25 0.03 c0.24v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.59 0.67 0.53 0.78 0.55 0.78 0.42 0.80Uniform Delay, d1 38.8 27.7 39.2 29.7 41.8 29.7 42.5 31.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.7 1.2 2.3 3.6 4.0 3.4 2.2 4.4Delay (s) 42.5 28.9 41.5 33.4 45.8 33.1 44.7 35.4Level of Service D C D C D C D DApproach Delay (s) 31.0 34.3 34.3 35.9Approach LOS C C C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 33.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.9 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.7% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 77: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis13: Monterey & 280 Ramps 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 14

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 215 334 6 126 895 284 2 96 94 173 74 284Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1557 3245 3294 1799 1531 1740 1338Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1557 3245 3294 1799 1531 1740 1338Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Adj. Flow (vph) 226 352 6 133 942 299 2 101 99 182 78 299RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 23 0 0 0 90 0 0 256Lane Group Flow (vph) 190 393 0 0 1351 0 0 103 9 0 260 43Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type Split Split Split Perm Split PermProtected Phases 2 2 6 6 8 8 4 4Permitted Phases 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.45 0.09 0.09 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 255 531 1497 164 139 253 195v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.12 c0.41 c0.06 c0.15v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.03v/c Ratio 0.75 0.74 0.90 0.63 0.06 1.03 0.22Uniform Delay, d1 43.8 43.8 27.7 48.2 45.7 47.0 41.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 17.9 9.0 9.2 16.8 0.9 63.9 2.6Delay (s) 61.7 52.8 36.9 65.0 46.6 110.9 44.1Level of Service E D D E D F DApproach Delay (s) 55.7 36.9 56.0 75.2Approach LOS E D E E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 50.2 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.8% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 78: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis14: Bosworth & Arlington 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 33 623 359 174 944 78 0 0 0 29 0 75Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.94 0.90Hourly flow rate (vph) 37 692 382 185 1049 87 0 0 0 32 0 83Pedestrians 50Lane Width (ft) 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0Percent Blockage 4Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 364pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 1186 1074 2502 2512 537 1932 2660 1142vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1186 1074 2502 2512 537 1932 2660 1142tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 93 71 100 100 100 0 100 55cM capacity (veh/h) 562 645 6 18 488 28 14 187

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 SB 1Volume Total 37 461 613 1321 116Volume Left 37 0 0 185 32Volume Right 0 0 382 87 83cSH 562 1700 1700 645 72Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.27 0.36 0.29 1.61Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 0 0 30 247Control Delay (s) 11.8 0.0 0.0 11.3 429.3Lane LOS B B FApproach Delay (s) 0.4 11.3 429.3Approach LOS F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 25.5Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 79: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: Sagamore & San Jose 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 16

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 90 32 0 767 29 140 89 3 357 497 1035Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1801 1509 4874 3319 1791 1711 2981 1352Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1801 1509 4874 3319 1791 1711 2981 1352Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 0 96 34 0 816 31 149 95 3 380 529 1101RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 28 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 96 6 0 843 0 149 96 0 380 1080 550Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 57 22Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 1 2Turn Type custom Prot Prot customProtected Phases 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 15Actuated Green, G (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 7.0 21.0 32.0 44.0 57.0Effective Green, g (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 7.0 21.0 32.0 44.0 57.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.23 0.36 0.49 0.63Clearance Time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 340 285 921 258 418 608 1457 856v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.04 0.05 0.22 c0.36v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.00 c0.41v/c Ratio 0.28 0.02 0.92 0.58 0.23 0.62 0.74 0.64Uniform Delay, d1 31.3 29.7 35.8 40.1 28.0 24.0 18.4 10.2Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.1 15.1 9.1 1.3 4.8 3.4 3.7Delay (s) 33.3 29.9 50.9 49.2 29.2 28.8 21.9 13.9Level of Service C C D D C C C BApproach Delay (s) 32.4 50.9 41.3 21.0Approach LOS C D D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 30.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.2% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 80: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: Alemany & I-280 On-Ramp 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR EBR2 WBL WBR2 NBT NBR NBR2 SBT NWR2Lane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 268 589 3 11 256 164 222 303 12 485 39Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.86Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3419 1531 3305 1496 4916 1531 1531 4916 1452Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 3419 1531 1473 1496 4916 1531 1531 4916 1452Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98Adj. Flow (vph) 273 601 3 11 261 167 227 309 12 495 40RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 7 0 115 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 273 604 0 4 261 52 227 309 12 495 40Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 17Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2Turn Type custom Perm custom custom Perm Perm customProtected Phases 2! 4!Permitted Phases 7! 2 3 6 4 4 4! 6!Actuated Green, G (s) 43.0 26.0 26.0 14.0 25.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 25.0Effective Green, g (s) 43.0 26.0 26.0 14.0 25.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 25.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.32 0.32 0.18 0.31 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.31Clearance Time (s) 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 920 1111 498 258 468 1413 440 440 1413 454v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.05v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 0.00 c0.18 0.03 c0.20 0.01 0.10 0.03v/c Ratio 0.30 0.54 0.01 1.01 0.11 0.16 0.70 0.03 0.35 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 10.2 22.1 18.3 33.0 19.6 21.3 25.4 20.5 22.6 19.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.9 0.0 59.0 0.5 0.2 9.0 0.1 0.7 0.4Delay (s) 11.0 24.0 18.3 92.0 20.1 21.5 34.5 20.6 23.3 19.8Level of Service B C B F C C C C C BApproach Delay (s) 20.0 28.8 23.3Approach LOS B C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 30.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.3% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15! Phase conflict between lane groups.c Critical Lane Group

Page 81: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis17: Seneca & San Jose Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 10/3/2013 Alternative 1, Element 2 Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 18

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 50 80 211 49 55 296Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Hourly flow rate (vph) 53 85 224 52 59 315PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 373 584pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 525 138 277vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 525 138 277tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 88 90 95cM capacity (veh/h) 460 885 1283

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 138 150 127 163 210Volume Left 53 0 0 59 0Volume Right 85 0 52 0 0cSH 653 1700 1700 1283 1700Volume to Capacity 0.21 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.12Queue Length 95th (ft) 20 0 0 4 0Control Delay (s) 12.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0Lane LOS B AApproach Delay (s) 12.0 0.0 1.4Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 2.7Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 82: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Ocean & Geneva Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 1

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 1071 0 0 1017 415 4Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Grade (%) 5% 5% 0%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.97Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (prot) 3336 3336 3319Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 3336 3336 3319Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 1139 0 0 1082 441 4RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 1139 0 0 1082 444 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100Turn TypeProtected Phases 13 1 8Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 46.0 46.0 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 46.0 46.0 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.32Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1918 1918 1079v/s Ratio Prot c0.34 0.32 c0.13v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.59 0.56 0.41Uniform Delay, d1 11.0 10.7 21.0Progression Factor 0.53 1.78 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 1.0 0.3Delay (s) 6.8 20.0 21.3Level of Service A B CApproach Delay (s) 6.8 20.0 21.3Approach LOS A B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 14.6 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.2% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 83: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2001: Ocean & Phelan 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 19

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 107 882 347 0 1165 469 0 0 0 189 267 110Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Grade (%) 5% 0% 0% 0%Total Lost time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95Frt 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.97Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (prot) 1668 3194 4704 3267Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98Satd. Flow (perm) 1668 3194 4704 3267Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 114 938 369 0 1239 499 0 0 0 201 284 117RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 52 0 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 26 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 114 1255 0 0 1652 0 0 0 0 0 576 0Turn Type Prot PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4Permitted Phases 4Actuated Green, G (s) 10.4 46.0 32.1 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 10.4 46.0 32.1 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.58 0.40 0.32Clearance Time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 217 1837 1887 1062v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.39 c0.35v/s Ratio Perm 0.18v/c Ratio 0.53 0.68 0.88 0.54Uniform Delay, d1 32.5 11.9 22.1 22.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 2.1 5.5 0.6Delay (s) 34.8 14.0 29.2 22.7Level of Service C B C CApproach Delay (s) 15.7 29.2 0.0 22.7Approach LOS B C A C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 23.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.5% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 84: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Ocean & Howth 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 846 0 0 1023 85 48 9 61 50 0 10Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 0.93 0.98Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.96Satd. Flow (prot) 3421 3382 1642 1689Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.75Satd. Flow (perm) 3421 3382 1471 1324Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 0 900 0 0 1088 90 51 10 65 53 0 11RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 44 0 0 7 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 900 0 0 1171 0 0 82 0 0 57 0Turn Type Perm PermProtected Phases 6 6 8 4Permitted Phases 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 45.0 45.0 26.0 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 45.0 45.0 26.0 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.32 0.32Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1924 1902 478 430v/s Ratio Prot 0.26 c0.35v/s Ratio Perm c0.06 0.04v/c Ratio 0.47 0.62 0.17 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 10.4 11.7 19.3 19.0Progression Factor 0.21 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 1.5 0.8 0.6Delay (s) 2.8 13.2 20.1 19.7Level of Service A B C BApproach Delay (s) 2.8 13.2 20.1 19.7Approach LOS A B C B

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.7 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.7% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 85: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Ocean & 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 3

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 957 10 0 621 0 0 0 0 105 600 487Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3416 1801 1711 1680Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3416 1801 1711 1680Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1018 11 0 661 0 0 0 0 112 638 518RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1028 0 0 661 0 0 0 0 112 1129 0Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100Turn Type SplitProtected Phases 4 8 6 6Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 37.0 37.0 65.0 65.0Effective Green, g (s) 37.0 37.0 65.0 65.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.59 0.59Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1149 606 1011 993v/s Ratio Prot 0.30 c0.37 0.07 c0.67v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.89 1.09 0.11 1.14Uniform Delay, d1 34.7 36.5 9.8 22.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.63 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 9.2 43.8 0.2 74.3Delay (s) 43.9 103.4 10.1 96.8Level of Service D F B FApproach Delay (s) 43.9 103.4 0.0 89.1Approach LOS D F A F

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 76.6 HCM Level of Service EHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.12Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.7% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 86: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: Ocean & I-280 On Ramp 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 583 521 7 9 532 186 89 222 92 5 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.71 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 1775 872 1801 1093 905 781 1711Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 1775 872 1801 1093 905 781 1711Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Adj. Flow (vph) 601 537 7 9 548 192 92 229 95 5 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 68 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 601 544 0 9 548 156 0 321 27 5 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 100% 100% 2% 2% 100% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2%Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm ProtProtected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 14Permitted Phases 6 3 3Actuated Green, G (s) 43.8 77.2 2.4 33.8 33.8 14.0 14.0 1.4Effective Green, g (s) 43.8 77.2 2.4 33.8 33.8 14.0 14.0 1.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.70 0.02 0.31 0.31 0.13 0.13 0.01Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 681 1246 19 553 336 115 99 22v/s Ratio Prot c0.35 0.31 0.01 c0.30 c0.00v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.35 0.03v/c Ratio 0.88 0.44 0.47 0.99 0.46 2.79 0.27 0.23Uniform Delay, d1 30.7 7.0 53.2 37.9 30.8 48.0 43.4 53.8Progression Factor 0.47 0.12 1.07 1.08 1.17 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 7.7 0.6 5.1 31.5 3.5 829.8 0.5 5.2Delay (s) 22.2 1.5 62.1 72.4 39.5 877.8 43.9 59.0Level of Service C A E E D F D EApproach Delay (s) 12.3 63.8 687.4 59.0Approach LOS B E F E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 150.4 HCM Level of Service FHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.20Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.0% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 87: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5: Ocean & San Jose 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 5

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 164 382 55 102 475 48 115 156 52 52 286 109Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.64 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 0.95Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.99Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 0.97Flt Protected 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 1731 984 1711 1718 1601 1645 1620Flt Permitted 0.56 1.00 0.33 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.93Satd. Flow (perm) 980 984 596 1718 509 1645 1522Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 174 406 59 109 505 51 122 166 55 55 304 116RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 9 0 3 0 0 11 0 0 11 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 580 50 109 553 0 122 210 0 0 464 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 65.9 65.9 65.9 65.9 35.1 35.1 35.1Effective Green, g (s) 65.9 65.9 65.9 65.9 35.1 35.1 35.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.32 0.32 0.32Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 587 590 357 1029 162 525 486v/s Ratio Prot 0.32 0.13v/s Ratio Perm c0.59 0.05 0.18 0.24 c0.30v/c Ratio 0.99 0.09 0.31 0.54 0.75 0.40 0.95Uniform Delay, d1 21.7 9.3 10.8 13.0 33.6 29.2 36.7Progression Factor 1.74 2.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 32.3 0.1 0.5 0.5 27.2 2.3 31.0Delay (s) 70.0 20.2 11.3 13.6 60.8 31.5 67.7Level of Service E C B B E C EApproach Delay (s) 65.4 13.2 41.9 67.7Approach LOS E B D E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 45.8 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.98Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 122.8% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 88: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis6: Ocean & Alemany 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 119 226 42 51 225 75 51 550 52 241 801 215Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88Flpb, ped/bikes 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1625 1729 1618 1687 3402 1175 3353 1351Flt Permitted 0.43 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.65 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 739 1729 813 1687 2633 1175 2217 1351Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 127 240 45 54 239 80 54 585 55 256 852 229RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 15 0 0 0 22 0 0 92Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 276 0 54 304 0 0 639 33 0 1108 137Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Parking (#/hr) 6Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 2 6 6Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 6 6Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0Effective Green, g (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 249 584 274 569 1415 632 1192 726v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 c0.18v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.07 0.24 0.03 c0.50 0.10v/c Ratio 0.51 0.47 0.20 0.53 0.45 0.05 0.93 0.19Uniform Delay, d1 21.2 20.9 18.8 21.4 11.3 8.8 17.1 9.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 7.3 2.7 1.6 3.6 1.0 0.2 13.9 0.6Delay (s) 28.5 23.6 20.4 25.0 12.3 9.0 31.0 10.1Level of Service C C C C B A C BApproach Delay (s) 25.1 24.3 12.1 27.4Approach LOS C C B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 22.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 133.3% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 89: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis7: Geneva Ave & Howth 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 7

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 23 448 38 361 646 95 0 0 0 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Grade (%) 5% 5% 0% 0%Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.87 1.00Frt 0.99 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3207 1454 3146Flt Permitted 0.91 0.44 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2912 678 3146Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 24 477 40 384 687 101 0 0 0 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 536 0 384 777 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8Permitted Phases 4 8Actuated Green, G (s) 63.2 63.2 63.2Effective Green, g (s) 63.2 63.2 63.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.70Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2045 476 2209v/s Ratio Prot 0.25v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 c0.57v/c Ratio 0.26 0.81 0.35Uniform Delay, d1 4.9 9.2 5.3Progression Factor 1.00 0.83 0.68Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 9.5 0.1Delay (s) 5.0 17.1 3.7Level of Service A B AApproach Delay (s) 5.0 8.1 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A A A A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 7.1 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 26.8Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.0% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 90: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: Geneva Ave & I280 SB Off 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 250 180 476 631 0 0 0 0 414 11 185Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 2887 827 1540 3079 1593 1233Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2887 827 1540 3079 1593 1233Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Adj. Flow (vph) 0 260 188 496 657 0 0 0 0 431 11 193RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 144 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 134 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 260 44 496 657 0 0 0 0 431 70 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 30 30Parking (#/hr) 5 5Turn Type Perm Prot PermProtected Phases 2 1 6 4Permitted Phases 2 4Actuated Green, G (s) 21.3 21.3 31.4 55.7 27.3 27.3Effective Green, g (s) 21.3 21.3 31.4 55.7 27.3 27.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.35 0.62 0.30 0.30Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 683 196 537 1906 483 374v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.32 c0.21 0.06v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 c0.27v/c Ratio 0.38 0.23 0.92 0.34 0.89 0.19Uniform Delay, d1 28.8 27.7 28.1 8.3 29.9 23.1Progression Factor 0.87 2.10 0.90 0.84 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.6 2.6 18.8 0.4 18.8 0.3Delay (s) 26.5 60.9 44.2 7.4 48.8 23.5Level of Service C E D A D CApproach Delay (s) 41.0 23.2 0.0 40.6Approach LOS D C A D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 31.7 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.0% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 91: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis9: Geneva Ave & I280 NB On 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 22 657 0 0 709 195 386 179 524 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.86Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3067 3079 1004 1621 1219Flt Permitted 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2826 3079 1004 1621 1219Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97Adj. Flow (vph) 23 677 0 0 731 201 398 185 540 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 68 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 700 0 0 731 151 0 583 472 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type custom Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 2 6 8Permitted Phases 5 6 8 8Actuated Green, G (s) 40.8 40.8 40.8 42.2 42.2Effective Green, g (s) 40.8 40.8 40.8 42.2 42.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.47 0.47Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1281 1396 455 760 572v/s Ratio Prot 0.24v/s Ratio Perm c0.25 0.15 0.36 c0.39v/c Ratio 0.55 0.52 0.33 0.77 0.83Uniform Delay, d1 17.9 17.6 15.8 19.8 20.7Progression Factor 1.25 0.68 0.44 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 1.1 1.5 5.5 10.5Delay (s) 23.5 13.0 8.4 25.3 31.2Level of Service C B A C CApproach Delay (s) 23.5 12.0 28.2 0.0Approach LOS C B C A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 21.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 7.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 92: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: Geneva Ave & San Jose Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 10

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR2 NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 21 962 159 23 622 64 83 148 29 33 130 183Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.80Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.91Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1500 2870 1470 2843 2825 1168 1013Flt Permitted 0.23 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.72 0.58 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 357 2870 216 2843 2075 716 1013Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 22 1023 169 24 662 68 88 157 31 35 138 195RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 9 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 22 1184 0 24 722 0 0 267 0 35 333 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 400 400 400 400 400 400 400Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 30 30 10 10Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 6 0Parking (#/hr) 5 5Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 41.0 41.0 33.6 33.6 38.5 38.5 38.5Effective Green, g (s) 41.0 41.0 33.6 33.6 38.5 38.5 38.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.46 0.37 0.37 0.43 0.43 0.43Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 193 1307 81 1061 888 306 433v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.41 0.25 c0.33v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.11 0.13 0.05v/c Ratio 0.11 0.91 0.30 0.68 0.30 0.11 0.77Uniform Delay, d1 14.9 22.7 19.9 23.7 16.9 15.5 22.0Progression Factor 1.26 0.97 1.40 1.30 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 8.3 8.0 3.1 0.2 0.2 8.0Delay (s) 19.0 30.2 35.9 34.0 17.1 15.7 30.0Level of Service B C D C B B CApproach Delay (s) 30.0 34.0 17.1 28.6Approach LOS C C B C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 29.6 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.5Intersection Capacity Utilization 107.8% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 93: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis10: Geneva Ave & San Jose Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 11

Movement SERLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900Total Lost time (s)Lane Util. FactorFrpb, ped/bikesFlpb, ped/bikesFrtFlt ProtectedSatd. Flow (prot)Flt PermittedSatd. Flow (perm)Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 400Confl. Bikes (#/hr)Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0Parking (#/hr)Turn Type customProtected PhasesPermitted Phases 13Actuated Green, G (s)Effective Green, g (s)Actuated g/C RatioClearance Time (s)Vehicle Extension (s)Lane Grp Cap (vph)v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Permv/c RatioUniform Delay, d1Progression FactorIncremental Delay, d2Delay (s)Level of ServiceApproach Delay (s)Approach LOS

Intersection Summary

Page 94: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis11: Geneva Ave & Cayuga Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 12

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 59 767 46 61 643 50 57 39 61 26 64 63Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99Frt 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.94Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99Satd. Flow (prot) 2843 2810 1288 1303Flt Permitted 0.84 0.81 0.85 0.94Satd. Flow (perm) 2407 2275 1114 1229Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96Adj. Flow (vph) 61 799 48 64 670 52 59 41 64 27 67 66RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 27 0 0 29 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 904 0 0 781 0 0 137 0 0 131 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0Parking (#/hr) 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2Turn Type Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6Actuated Green, G (s) 59.7 59.7 22.3 22.3Effective Green, g (s) 59.7 59.7 22.3 22.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.25 0.25Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1597 1509 276 305v/s Ratio Protv/s Ratio Perm c0.38 0.34 c0.12 0.11v/c Ratio 0.57 0.52 0.50 0.43Uniform Delay, d1 8.2 7.8 29.0 28.5Progression Factor 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 1.3 1.4 1.0Delay (s) 3.4 9.0 30.4 29.5Level of Service A A C CApproach Delay (s) 3.4 9.0 30.4 29.5Approach LOS A A C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 9.9 HCM Level of Service AHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 95: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: Geneva Ave & Alemany 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 131 616 83 107 533 267 79 547 247 49 664 102Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3360 1711 3250 1711 3262 1711 3353Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 3360 1711 3250 1711 3262 1711 3353Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 139 655 88 114 567 284 84 582 263 52 706 109RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 7 0 0 45 0 0 45 0 0 11 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 139 736 0 114 806 0 84 800 0 52 804 0Turn Type Prot Prot Prot ProtProtected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 13.2 31.5 12.1 30.4 8.6 30.3 7.0 28.7Effective Green, g (s) 13.2 31.5 12.1 30.4 8.6 30.3 7.0 28.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.33 0.13 0.32 0.09 0.32 0.07 0.30Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 236 1104 216 1030 153 1031 125 1003v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.22 0.07 c0.25 0.05 c0.25 0.03 c0.24v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.59 0.67 0.53 0.78 0.55 0.78 0.42 0.80Uniform Delay, d1 38.8 27.7 39.2 29.7 41.8 29.7 42.5 31.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.7 1.2 2.3 3.6 4.0 3.4 2.2 4.4Delay (s) 42.5 28.9 41.5 33.4 45.8 33.1 44.7 35.4Level of Service D C D C D C D DApproach Delay (s) 31.0 34.3 34.3 35.9Approach LOS C C C D

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 33.9 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.9 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.7% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 96: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis13: Monterey & 280 Ramps 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 14

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 215 334 6 126 895 284 2 96 94 173 74 284Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1557 3245 3294 1799 1531 1740 1338Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1557 3245 3294 1799 1531 1740 1338Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95Adj. Flow (vph) 226 352 6 133 942 299 2 101 99 182 78 299RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 23 0 0 0 90 0 0 256Lane Group Flow (vph) 190 393 0 0 1351 0 0 103 9 0 260 43Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type Split Split Split Perm Split PermProtected Phases 2 2 6 6 8 8 4 4Permitted Phases 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.45 0.09 0.09 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 255 531 1497 164 139 253 195v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.12 c0.41 c0.06 c0.15v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.03v/c Ratio 0.75 0.74 0.90 0.63 0.06 1.03 0.22Uniform Delay, d1 43.8 43.8 27.7 48.2 45.7 47.0 41.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 17.9 9.0 9.2 16.8 0.9 63.9 2.6Delay (s) 61.7 52.8 36.9 65.0 46.6 110.9 44.1Level of Service E D D E D F DApproach Delay (s) 55.7 36.9 56.0 75.2Approach LOS E D E E

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 50.2 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.8% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 97: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis14: Bosworth & Arlington 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 33 623 359 174 944 78 0 0 0 29 0 75Sign Control Free Free Stop StopGrade 0% 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90Hourly flow rate (vph) 37 692 399 193 1049 87 0 0 0 32 0 83Pedestrians 50 50Lane Width (ft) 0.0 11.0Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0Percent Blockage 0 4Right turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 364pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 1186 1141 2534 2587 596 1948 2743 1142vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 1186 1141 2534 2587 596 1948 2743 1142tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3p0 queue free % 93 68 100 100 100 0 100 55cM capacity (veh/h) 562 608 5 15 447 26 12 187

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1Volume Total 37 461 630 193 1136 116Volume Left 37 0 0 193 0 32Volume Right 0 0 399 0 87 83cSH 562 1700 1700 608 1700 69Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.27 0.37 0.32 0.67 1.69Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 0 0 34 0 254Control Delay (s) 11.8 0.0 0.0 13.7 0.0 464.4Lane LOS B B FApproach Delay (s) 0.4 2.0 464.4Approach LOS F

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 22.1Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.3% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 98: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: Sagamore & San Jose 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 16

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 90 32 0 767 29 140 89 3 357 497 1035Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1801 1509 4874 3319 1791 1711 2981 1352Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1801 1509 4874 3319 1791 1711 2981 1352Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Adj. Flow (vph) 0 96 34 0 816 31 149 95 3 380 529 1101RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 28 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 96 6 0 843 0 149 96 0 380 1080 550Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 57 22Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 1 2Turn Type custom Prot Prot customProtected Phases 8 5 2 1 6Permitted Phases 4 4 15Actuated Green, G (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 7.0 21.0 32.0 44.0 57.0Effective Green, g (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 7.0 21.0 32.0 44.0 57.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.23 0.36 0.49 0.63Clearance Time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 340 285 921 258 418 608 1457 856v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.04 0.05 0.22 c0.36v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.00 c0.41v/c Ratio 0.28 0.02 0.92 0.58 0.23 0.62 0.74 0.64Uniform Delay, d1 31.3 29.7 35.8 40.1 28.0 24.0 18.4 10.2Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.1 15.1 9.1 1.3 4.8 3.4 3.7Delay (s) 33.3 29.9 50.9 49.2 29.2 28.8 21.9 13.9Level of Service C C D D C C C BApproach Delay (s) 32.4 50.9 41.3 21.0Approach LOS C D D C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 30.8 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.2% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

Page 99: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: Alemany & I-280 On-Ramp 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 17

Movement EBL EBT EBR EBR2 WBL WBR2 NBT NBR NBR2 SBT NWR2Lane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 268 589 3 11 256 164 222 303 12 485 39Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.86Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3419 1531 3305 1496 4916 1531 1531 4916 1452Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 3419 1531 1473 1496 4916 1531 1531 4916 1452Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98Adj. Flow (vph) 273 601 3 11 261 167 227 309 12 495 40RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 7 0 115 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 273 604 0 4 261 52 227 309 12 495 40Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 17Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2Turn Type custom Perm custom custom Perm Perm customProtected Phases 2! 4!Permitted Phases 7! 2 3 6 4 4 4! 6!Actuated Green, G (s) 43.0 26.0 26.0 14.0 25.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 25.0Effective Green, g (s) 43.0 26.0 26.0 14.0 25.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 25.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.32 0.32 0.18 0.31 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.31Clearance Time (s) 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 920 1111 498 258 468 1413 440 440 1413 454v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.05v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 0.00 c0.18 0.03 c0.20 0.01 0.10 0.03v/c Ratio 0.30 0.54 0.01 1.01 0.11 0.16 0.70 0.03 0.35 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 10.2 22.1 18.3 33.0 19.6 21.3 25.4 20.5 22.6 19.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.9 0.0 59.0 0.5 0.2 9.0 0.1 0.7 0.4Delay (s) 11.0 24.0 18.3 92.0 20.1 21.5 34.5 20.6 23.3 19.8Level of Service B C B F C C C C C BApproach Delay (s) 20.0 28.8 23.3Approach LOS B C C

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 30.5 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.3% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15! Phase conflict between lane groups.c Critical Lane Group

Page 100: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis17: Seneca & San Jose Ave 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 1-Element 4 PM Synchro 7 - ReportFehr & Peers Page 18

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (veh/h) 50 80 119 49 55 296Sign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94Hourly flow rate (vph) 53 85 127 52 59 315PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type None NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 373 584pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 585 153 179vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 585 153 179tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 88 90 96cM capacity (veh/h) 454 893 1397

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2Volume Total 138 179 39 334Volume Left 53 0 39 20Volume Right 85 52 0 0cSH 651 1700 1397 1397Volume to Capacity 0.21 0.11 0.04 0.04Queue Length 95th (ft) 20 0 3 3Control Delay (s) 12.0 0.0 7.7 0.8Lane LOS B A AApproach Delay (s) 12.0 0.0 1.5Approach LOS B

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 3.2Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

Page 101: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

1: Ocean & Geneva Ave 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 1

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 488 0 0 392 1040 4

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Grade (%) 5% 5% 0%

Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.97

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00

Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00

Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95

Satd. Flow (prot) 3336 3336 3324

Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95

Satd. Flow (perm) 3336 3336 3324

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 519 0 0 417 1106 4

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 519 0 0 417 1110 0

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100

Turn Type

Protected Phases 13 1 8

Permitted Phases

Actuated Green, G (s) 47.0 47.0 25.0

Effective Green, g (s) 47.0 47.0 25.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.59 0.59 0.31

Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0

Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1960 1960 1039

v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.13 c0.33

v/s Ratio Perm

v/c Ratio 0.26 0.21 1.07

Uniform Delay, d1 8.1 7.8 27.5

Progression Factor 0.57 0.88 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.2 48.1

Delay (s) 4.8 7.1 75.6

Level of Service A A E

Approach Delay (s) 4.8 7.1 75.6

Approach LOS A A E

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 43.7 HCM Level of Service D

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.54

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.3% ICU Level of Service C

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 102: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

2001: Ocean & Phelan 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 18

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 107 413 816 0 1165 469 0 0 0 75 381 110

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Grade (%) 5% 0% 0% 0%

Total Lost time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95

Frt 1.00 0.90 0.96 0.97

Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99

Satd. Flow (prot) 1668 3003 4704 3300

Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99

Satd. Flow (perm) 1668 3003 4704 3300

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 114 439 868 0 1239 499 0 0 0 80 405 117

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 83 0 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 26 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 114 1225 0 0 1652 0 0 0 0 0 576 0

Turn Type Prot Perm

Protected Phases 5 2 6 4

Permitted Phases 4

Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 47.0 33.9 25.0

Effective Green, g (s) 9.6 47.0 33.9 25.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.59 0.42 0.31

Clearance Time (s) 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0

Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 200 1764 1993 1031

v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.41 c0.35

v/s Ratio Perm 0.17

v/c Ratio 0.57 0.91dr 0.83 0.56

Uniform Delay, d1 33.3 11.5 20.5 22.9

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.49 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 3.7 2.3 2.8 0.7

Delay (s) 36.9 13.8 33.4 23.6

Level of Service D B C C

Approach Delay (s) 15.6 33.4 0.0 23.6

Approach LOS B C A C

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 25.1 HCM Level of Service C

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.5% ICU Level of Service D

Analysis Period (min) 15

dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane.

c Critical Lane Group

Page 103: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

2: Ocean & Howth 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 2

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 0 263 0 0 398 26 48 68 61 50 0 10

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00

Frt 1.00 0.99 0.95 0.98

Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.96

Satd. Flow (prot) 3421 3389 1694 1689

Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.72

Satd. Flow (perm) 3421 3389 1568 1273

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 0 280 0 0 423 28 51 72 65 53 0 11

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 24 0 0 7 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 280 0 0 445 0 0 164 0 0 57 0

Turn Type Perm Perm

Protected Phases 6 6 8 4

Permitted Phases 8 4

Actuated Green, G (s) 45.0 45.0 26.0 26.0

Effective Green, g (s) 45.0 45.0 26.0 26.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.56 0.32 0.32

Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1924 1906 510 414

v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.13

v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.04

v/c Ratio 0.15 0.23 0.32 0.14

Uniform Delay, d1 8.3 8.8 20.4 19.1

Progression Factor 0.13 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.3 1.7 0.7

Delay (s) 1.2 9.1 22.0 19.8

Level of Service A A C B

Approach Delay (s) 1.2 9.1 22.0 19.8

Approach LOS A A C B

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 10.0 HCM Level of Service B

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.27

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.7% ICU Level of Service C

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 104: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

4: Ocean & 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 3

Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 416 7 9 417 7 0

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95

Satd. Flow (prot) 1769 872 1801 872

Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95

Satd. Flow (perm) 1769 872 1801 872

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97

Adj. Flow (vph) 429 7 9 430 7 0

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 436 0 9 430 7 0

Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 100% 100% 2% 100% 100%

Turn Type Prot

Protected Phases 2 1 6

Permitted Phases 14

Actuated Green, G (s) 74.2 2.4 79.6 2.4

Effective Green, g (s) 74.2 2.4 79.6 2.4

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.82 0.03 0.88 0.03

Clearance Time (s) 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0

Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1458 23 1593 23

v/s Ratio Prot c0.25 c0.01 0.24

v/s Ratio Perm c0.01

v/c Ratio 0.30 0.39 0.27 0.30

Uniform Delay, d1 1.8 43.1 0.8 43.0

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 4.0 0.4 2.7

Delay (s) 2.4 47.0 1.2 45.7

Level of Service A D A D

Approach Delay (s) 2.4 2.1 45.7

Approach LOS A A D

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 2.6 HCM Level of Service A

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.30

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.8% ICU Level of Service B

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 105: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

5: Ocean & San Jose 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 4

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 33 348 40 205 323 77 0 255 86 52 297 75

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.96 0.97 0.98

Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.99

Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.98

Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99

Satd. Flow (prot) 1780 1195 1556 1675 1683 1694

Flt Permitted 0.94 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 0.92

Satd. Flow (perm) 1688 1195 635 1675 1683 1565

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 35 370 43 218 344 82 0 271 91 55 316 80

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 15 0 13 0 0 19 0 0 12 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 405 28 218 413 0 0 343 0 0 439 0

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm

Protected Phases 4 8 2 6

Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6

Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 29.0 29.0

Effective Green, g (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 29.0 29.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.45 0.45

Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 701 496 264 696 751 698

v/s Ratio Prot 0.25 0.20

v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 0.02 c0.34 c0.28

v/c Ratio 0.58 0.06 0.83 0.59 0.46 0.63

Uniform Delay, d1 14.6 11.4 16.9 14.7 12.5 13.9

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 3.5 0.2 24.6 3.7 2.0 4.3

Delay (s) 18.1 11.6 41.5 18.4 14.5 18.1

Level of Service B B D B B B

Approach Delay (s) 17.4 26.2 14.5 18.1

Approach LOS B C B B

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 20.0 HCM Level of Service C

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.7% ICU Level of Service G

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 106: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

6: Ocean & Alemany 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 5

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 134 226 42 51 225 75 46 555 52 241 801 215

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88

Flpb, ped/bikes 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00

Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85

Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00

Satd. Flow (prot) 1625 1729 1618 1687 3404 1175 3353 1351

Flt Permitted 0.43 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.79 1.00 0.65 1.00

Satd. Flow (perm) 739 1729 813 1687 2715 1175 2217 1351

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 143 240 45 54 239 80 49 590 55 256 852 229

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 15 0 0 0 22 0 0 92

Lane Group Flow (vph) 143 276 0 54 304 0 0 639 33 0 1108 137

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10 10 10

Parking (#/hr) 6

Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm

Protected Phases 2 2 6 6

Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 6 6

Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0

Effective Green, g (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54

Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 249 584 274 569 1459 632 1192 726

v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 0.18

v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 0.07 0.24 0.03 c0.50 0.10

v/c Ratio 0.57 0.47 0.20 0.53 0.44 0.05 0.93 0.19

Uniform Delay, d1 21.8 20.9 18.8 21.4 11.2 8.8 17.1 9.5

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 9.3 2.7 1.6 3.6 1.0 0.2 13.9 0.6

Delay (s) 31.1 23.6 20.4 25.0 12.1 9.0 31.0 10.1

Level of Service C C C C B A C B

Approach Delay (s) 26.1 24.3 11.9 27.4

Approach LOS C C B C

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 23.0 HCM Level of Service C

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 133.3% ICU Level of Service H

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 107: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

7: Geneva Ave & Howth 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 6

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 23 1031 38 361 1271 154 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Grade (%) 5% 5% 0% 0%

Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95

Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.97

Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00

Frt 0.99 1.00 0.98

Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00

Satd. Flow (prot) 3281 1603 3175

Flt Permitted 0.90 0.21 1.00

Satd. Flow (perm) 2940 348 3175

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 24 1097 40 384 1352 164 0 0 0 0 0 0

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1159 0 384 1507 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100 100

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10

Turn Type Perm Perm

Protected Phases 4 8

Permitted Phases 4 8

Actuated Green, G (s) 63.2 63.2 63.2

Effective Green, g (s) 63.2 63.2 63.2

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.70

Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0

Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2065 244 2230

v/s Ratio Prot 0.47

v/s Ratio Perm 0.39 c1.10

v/c Ratio 0.56 1.57 0.68

Uniform Delay, d1 6.6 13.4 7.6

Progression Factor 1.00 0.62 0.50

Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 270.5 0.5

Delay (s) 6.9 278.8 4.3

Level of Service A F A

Approach Delay (s) 6.9 59.8 0.0 0.0

Approach LOS A E A A

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 39.8 HCM Level of Service D

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.57

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 26.8

Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.9% ICU Level of Service D

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 108: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

8: Geneva Ave & I280 SB Off 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 7

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 0 833 180 476 828 0 0 0 0 487 1 672

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12

Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5

Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86

Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86

Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00

Satd. Flow (prot) 2887 831 1540 3079 1513 1173

Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00

Satd. Flow (perm) 2887 831 1540 3079 1513 1173

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96

Adj. Flow (vph) 0 868 188 496 862 0 0 0 0 507 1 700

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 868 122 496 862 0 0 0 0 456 676 0

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 30 30

Parking (#/hr) 5 5

Turn Type Perm Prot Perm

Protected Phases 2 1 6 4

Permitted Phases 2 4

Actuated Green, G (s) 23.5 23.5 21.0 47.5 35.5 35.5

Effective Green, g (s) 23.5 23.5 21.0 47.5 35.5 35.5

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.23 0.53 0.39 0.39

Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5

Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 754 217 359 1625 597 463

v/s Ratio Prot c0.30 c0.32 0.28

v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.30 0.58

v/c Ratio 1.15 0.56 1.38 0.53 0.76 1.46

Uniform Delay, d1 33.2 28.8 34.5 13.9 23.6 27.2

Progression Factor 0.75 0.70 0.98 1.50 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 80.9 8.6 184.0 0.9 6.1 218.4

Delay (s) 106.0 28.9 217.9 21.9 29.7 245.7

Level of Service F C F C C F

Approach Delay (s) 92.3 93.5 0.0 164.2

Approach LOS F F A F

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 116.7 HCM Level of Service F

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.35

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.3% ICU Level of Service G

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 109: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

9: Geneva Ave & I280 NB On 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 605 730 0 0 824 309 468 5 616 0 0 0

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Lane Width 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 11 11 11

Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.91 1.00 1.00

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.86

Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.85

Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00

Satd. Flow (prot) 2955 3931 1597 1219

Flt Permitted 0.51 1.00 0.95 1.00

Satd. Flow (perm) 1542 3931 1597 1219

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97

Adj. Flow (vph) 624 753 0 0 849 319 482 5 635 0 0 0

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 195 0 0 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1377 0 0 1109 0 0 487 440 0 0 0

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 100 100 100

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10

Turn Type Prot Perm Perm

Protected Phases 5 2 6 8

Permitted Phases 8 8

Actuated Green, G (s) 58.5 58.5 24.5 24.5

Effective Green, g (s) 58.5 58.5 24.5 24.5

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.65 0.27 0.27

Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1002 2555 435 332

v/s Ratio Prot 0.28

v/s Ratio Perm c0.89 0.30 c0.36

v/c Ratio 1.37 0.43 1.12 1.33

Uniform Delay, d1 15.8 7.7 32.8 32.8

Progression Factor 2.20 0.44 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 169.0 0.3 79.9 165.8

Delay (s) 203.7 3.6 112.6 198.6

Level of Service F A F F

Approach Delay (s) 203.7 3.6 161.3 0.0

Approach LOS F A F A

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 127.0 HCM Level of Service F

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.36

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 7.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.0% ICU Level of Service G

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 110: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

10: Geneva Ave & San Jose Ave 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 9

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR2 NBL2 NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 186 962 159 23 649 37 145 86 29 33 130 323

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.96 1.00 0.76

Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00

Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.89

Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00

Satd. Flow (prot) 1507 2870 1463 2927 2792 1168 938

Flt Permitted 0.20 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.55 0.58 1.00

Satd. Flow (perm) 318 2870 240 2927 1577 716 938

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 198 1023 169 24 690 39 154 91 31 35 138 344

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 0 0 5 0 0 9 0 0 0 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 198 1184 0 24 724 0 0 267 0 35 482 0

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 400 400 400 400 400 400 400

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 30 30 10 10

Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 6 0

Parking (#/hr) 5 5

Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm

Protected Phases 7 4 8 2 6

Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6

Actuated Green, G (s) 41.0 41.0 30.0 30.0 38.5 38.5 38.5

Effective Green, g (s) 41.0 41.0 30.0 30.0 38.5 38.5 38.5

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.46 0.33 0.33 0.43 0.43 0.43

Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5

Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 224 1307 80 976 675 306 401

v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.41 0.25 c0.51

v/s Ratio Perm 0.34 0.10 0.17 0.05

v/c Ratio 0.88 0.91 0.30 0.74 0.40 0.11 1.20

Uniform Delay, d1 20.3 22.7 22.2 26.6 17.7 15.5 25.8

Progression Factor 1.08 1.08 0.62 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 4.1 1.2 7.9 4.3 0.4 0.2 112.5

Delay (s) 26.1 25.6 21.6 20.2 18.1 15.7 138.2

Level of Service C C C C B B F

Approach Delay (s) 25.7 20.2 18.1 129.9

Approach LOS C C B F

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 41.9 HCM Level of Service D

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.05

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.5

Intersection Capacity Utilization 138.6% ICU Level of Service H

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 111: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

10: Geneva Ave & San Jose Ave 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 10

Movement SER

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 0

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900

Total Lost time (s)

Lane Util. Factor

Frpb, ped/bikes

Flpb, ped/bikes

Frt

Flt Protected

Satd. Flow (prot)

Flt Permitted

Satd. Flow (perm)

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 0

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 0

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 400

Confl. Bikes (#/hr)

Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0

Parking (#/hr)

Turn Type custom

Protected Phases

Permitted Phases 13

Actuated Green, G (s)

Effective Green, g (s)

Actuated g/C Ratio

Clearance Time (s)

Vehicle Extension (s)

Lane Grp Cap (vph)

v/s Ratio Prot

v/s Ratio Perm

v/c Ratio

Uniform Delay, d1

Progression Factor

Incremental Delay, d2

Delay (s)

Level of Service

Approach Delay (s)

Approach LOS

Intersection Summary

Page 112: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

11: Geneva Ave & Cayuga Ave 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 11

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 59 767 46 61 643 50 57 39 61 26 64 63

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00

Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 0.96 0.96

Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99

Frt 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.94

Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99

Satd. Flow (prot) 2846 2813 1263 1283

Flt Permitted 0.84 0.78 0.86 0.94

Satd. Flow (perm) 2402 2194 1102 1219

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96

Adj. Flow (vph) 61 799 48 64 670 52 59 41 64 27 67 66

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 22 0 0 24 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 902 0 0 779 0 0 142 0 0 136 0

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10 10 10

Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0

Parking (#/hr) 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2

Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm

Protected Phases 4 8 2 6

Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6

Actuated Green, G (s) 44.6 44.6 37.4 37.4

Effective Green, g (s) 44.6 44.6 37.4 37.4

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.50 0.42 0.42

Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1190 1087 458 507

v/s Ratio Prot

v/s Ratio Perm c0.38 0.36 c0.13 0.11

v/c Ratio 0.76 0.72 0.31 0.27

Uniform Delay, d1 18.3 17.8 17.7 17.3

Progression Factor 1.99 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 2.3 1.8 1.3

Delay (s) 37.9 20.0 19.4 18.6

Level of Service D C B B

Approach Delay (s) 37.9 20.0 19.4 18.6

Approach LOS D C B B

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 27.9 HCM Level of Service C

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.5% ICU Level of Service D

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 113: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

12: Geneva Ave & Alemany 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 12

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 131 616 83 107 533 267 79 547 247 49 664 102

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95

Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98

Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00

Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3360 1711 3250 1711 3262 1711 3353

Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00

Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 3360 1711 3250 1711 3262 1711 3353

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 139 655 88 114 567 284 84 582 263 52 706 109

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 7 0 0 45 0 0 45 0 0 11 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 139 736 0 114 806 0 84 800 0 52 804 0

Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot

Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6

Permitted Phases

Actuated Green, G (s) 13.2 31.5 12.1 30.4 8.6 30.3 7.0 28.7

Effective Green, g (s) 13.2 31.5 12.1 30.4 8.6 30.3 7.0 28.7

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.33 0.13 0.32 0.09 0.32 0.07 0.30

Clearance Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 236 1104 216 1030 153 1031 125 1003

v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.22 0.07 c0.25 0.05 c0.25 0.03 c0.24

v/s Ratio Perm

v/c Ratio 0.59 0.67 0.53 0.78 0.55 0.78 0.42 0.80

Uniform Delay, d1 38.8 27.7 39.2 29.7 41.8 29.7 42.5 31.0

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 3.7 1.2 2.3 3.6 4.0 3.4 2.2 4.4

Delay (s) 42.5 28.9 41.5 33.4 45.8 33.1 44.7 35.4

Level of Service D C D C D C D D

Approach Delay (s) 31.0 34.3 34.3 35.9

Approach LOS C C C D

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 33.9 HCM Level of Service C

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.9 Sum of lost time (s) 11.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.7% ICU Level of Service C

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 114: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

13: Monterey & 280 Ramps 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 13

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 215 334 6 158 895 284 2 96 146 173 74 284

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87

Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frt 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85

Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00

Satd. Flow (prot) 1557 3245 3293 1799 1531 1740 1338

Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00

Satd. Flow (perm) 1557 3245 3293 1799 1531 1740 1338

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95

Adj. Flow (vph) 226 352 6 166 942 299 2 101 154 182 78 299

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 22 0 0 0 140 0 0 256

Lane Group Flow (vph) 190 393 0 0 1385 0 0 103 14 0 260 43

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 50 50 50 50

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10

Turn Type Split Split Split Perm Split Perm

Protected Phases 2 2 6 6 8 8 4 4

Permitted Phases 8 4

Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0

Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 16.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.45 0.09 0.09 0.15 0.15

Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 255 531 1497 164 139 253 195

v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.12 c0.42 c0.06 c0.15

v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.03

v/c Ratio 0.75 0.74 0.92 0.63 0.10 1.03 0.22

Uniform Delay, d1 43.8 43.8 28.2 48.2 45.9 47.0 41.5

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 17.9 9.0 11.1 16.8 1.4 63.9 2.6

Delay (s) 61.7 52.8 39.4 65.0 47.3 110.9 44.1

Level of Service E D D E D F D

Approach Delay (s) 55.7 39.4 54.4 75.2

Approach LOS E D D E

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 51.3 HCM Level of Service D

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.8% ICU Level of Service E

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 115: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

14: Bosworth & Arlington 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 14

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (veh/h) 33 623 359 174 944 78 0 0 0 29 0 75

Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop

Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%

Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90

Hourly flow rate (vph) 37 692 399 193 1049 87 0 0 0 32 0 83

Pedestrians 50 50

Lane Width (ft) 0.0 11.0

Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0

Percent Blockage 0 4

Right turn flare (veh)

Median type None None

Median storage veh)

Upstream signal (ft) 364

pX, platoon unblocked

vC, conflicting volume 1186 1141 2534 2587 596 1948 2743 1142

vC1, stage 1 conf vol

vC2, stage 2 conf vol

vCu, unblocked vol 1186 1141 2534 2587 596 1948 2743 1142

tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9

tC, 2 stage (s)

tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3

p0 queue free % 93 68 100 100 100 0 100 55

cM capacity (veh/h) 562 608 5 15 447 26 12 187

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1

Volume Total 37 461 630 193 1136 116

Volume Left 37 0 0 193 0 32

Volume Right 0 0 399 0 87 83

cSH 562 1700 1700 608 1700 69

Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.27 0.37 0.32 0.67 1.69

Queue Length 95th (ft) 5 0 0 34 0 254

Control Delay (s) 11.8 0.0 0.0 13.7 0.0 464.4

Lane LOS B B F

Approach Delay (s) 0.4 2.0 464.4

Approach LOS F

Intersection Summary

Average Delay 22.1

Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.3% ICU Level of Service D

Analysis Period (min) 15

Page 116: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

15: Sagamore & San Jose 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 15

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 0 90 32 0 767 29 140 89 3 357 497 1035

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.97

Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85

Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00

Satd. Flow (prot) 1801 1509 4874 3319 1791 1711 2981 1352

Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00

Satd. Flow (perm) 1801 1509 4874 3319 1791 1711 2981 1352

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Adj. Flow (vph) 0 96 34 0 816 31 149 95 3 380 529 1101

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 28 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 96 6 0 843 0 149 96 0 380 1080 550

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 57 22

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 1 2

Turn Type custom Prot Prot custom

Protected Phases 8 5 2 1 6

Permitted Phases 4 4 15

Actuated Green, G (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 7.0 21.0 32.0 44.0 57.0

Effective Green, g (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 7.0 21.0 32.0 44.0 57.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.23 0.36 0.49 0.63

Clearance Time (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0

Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 340 285 921 258 418 608 1457 856

v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.04 0.05 0.22 c0.36

v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.00 c0.41

v/c Ratio 0.28 0.02 0.92 0.58 0.23 0.62 0.74 0.64

Uniform Delay, d1 31.3 29.7 35.8 40.1 28.0 24.0 18.4 10.2

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.1 15.1 9.1 1.3 4.8 3.4 3.7

Delay (s) 33.3 29.9 50.9 49.2 29.2 28.8 21.9 13.9

Level of Service C C D D C C C B

Approach Delay (s) 32.4 50.9 41.3 21.0

Approach LOS C D D C

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 30.8 HCM Level of Service C

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.2% ICU Level of Service E

Analysis Period (min) 15

c Critical Lane Group

Page 117: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

16: Alemany & I-280 On-Ramp 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 16

Movement EBL EBT EBR EBR2 WBL WBR2 NBT NBR NBR2 SBT NWR2

Lane Configurations

Volume (vph) 268 589 3 11 256 164 222 303 12 485 39

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900

Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00

Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93

Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.86

Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 3419 1531 3305 1496 4916 1531 1531 4916 1452

Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Satd. Flow (perm) 1711 3419 1531 1473 1496 4916 1531 1531 4916 1452

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98

Adj. Flow (vph) 273 601 3 11 261 167 227 309 12 495 40

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 7 0 115 0 0 0 0 0

Lane Group Flow (vph) 273 604 0 4 261 52 227 309 12 495 40

Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 17

Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2

Turn Type custom Perm custom custom Perm Perm custom

Protected Phases 2! 4!

Permitted Phases 7! 2 3 6 4 4 4! 6!

Actuated Green, G (s) 43.0 26.0 26.0 14.0 25.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 25.0

Effective Green, g (s) 43.0 26.0 26.0 14.0 25.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 25.0

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.32 0.32 0.18 0.31 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.31

Clearance Time (s) 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 920 1111 498 258 468 1413 440 440 1413 454

v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.05

v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 0.00 c0.18 0.03 c0.20 0.01 0.10 0.03

v/c Ratio 0.30 0.54 0.01 1.01 0.11 0.16 0.70 0.03 0.35 0.09

Uniform Delay, d1 10.2 22.1 18.3 33.0 19.6 21.3 25.4 20.5 22.6 19.4

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.9 0.0 59.0 0.5 0.2 9.0 0.1 0.7 0.4

Delay (s) 11.0 24.0 18.3 92.0 20.1 21.5 34.5 20.6 23.3 19.8

Level of Service B C B F C C C C C B

Approach Delay (s) 20.0 28.8 23.3

Approach LOS B C C

Intersection Summary

HCM Average Control Delay 30.5 HCM Level of Service C

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.3% ICU Level of Service E

Analysis Period (min) 15

! Phase conflict between lane groups.

c Critical Lane Group

Page 118: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis

17: Seneca & San Jose Ave 1/23/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study 5:00 pm 10/2/2013 Alternative 2 PM Synchro 7 - Report

Fehr & Peers Page 17

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT

Lane Configurations

Volume (veh/h) 76 54 181 64 40 410

Sign Control Stop Free Free

Grade 0% 0% 0%

Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94

Hourly flow rate (vph) 81 57 193 68 43 436

Pedestrians

Lane Width (ft)

Walking Speed (ft/s)

Percent Blockage

Right turn flare (veh)

Median type None None

Median storage veh)

Upstream signal (ft) 373 584

pX, platoon unblocked 0.98 0.98 0.98

vC, conflicting volume 748 227 261

vC1, stage 1 conf vol

vC2, stage 2 conf vol

vCu, unblocked vol 734 204 238

tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1

tC, 2 stage (s)

tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2

p0 queue free % 78 93 97

cM capacity (veh/h) 368 822 1305

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2

Volume Total 138 261 28 450

Volume Left 81 0 28 14

Volume Right 57 68 0 0

cSH 477 1700 1305 1305

Volume to Capacity 0.29 0.15 0.03 0.03

Queue Length 95th (ft) 30 0 3 3

Control Delay (s) 15.6 0.0 7.9 0.6

Lane LOS C A A

Approach Delay (s) 15.6 0.0 1.0

Approach LOS C

Intersection Summary

Average Delay 3.0

Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.6% ICU Level of Service A

Analysis Period (min) 15

Page 119: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

Study node

Signalization Intersection ApproachInt.

average LOS

Int. average

V/C

Transit travel

delay (s)

Int. average

LOS

Int. average

V/C

Transit travel

delay (s)

Int. average

LOS

Int. average

V/C

Transit travel

delay (s)

Int. average

LOS

Int. average

V/C

Transit travel

delay (s)

Int. average

LOS

Int. average

V/C

Transit travel

delay (s)

Int. average

LOS

Int. average

V/C

Transit travel

delay (s)

2001 signalized Geneva / Phelan EBT C 0.73 14 C 0.73 14 C 0.74 14 C 0.73 14 C 0.73 14 C 0.73 147 AWS Geneva / Howth EBT 0 0 1 A 0.88 5 A 0.79 5 A 0.6 0 A 0.81 5 D 1.57 78 signalized Geneva / I-280 SB Off Ramp EBT D 0.84 26 C 0.77 23 C 0.7 29 C 0.82 26 C 0.74 27 F 1.35 1069 signalized Geneva / I-280 NB Off Ramp EBT E 1.1 34 D 0.97 35 C 0.81 39 D 1.03 25 C 0.69 24 F 1.36 204

10 signalized Geneva / San Jose EBT C 0.69 24 C 0.84 30 D 0.84 42 C 0.69 23 C 0.84 30 D 1.05 2611 AWS Geneva / Cayuga EBT 0 0 46 B 0.55 16 A 0.55 2 C 0.56 25 A 0.55 3 C 0.55 3812 signalized Geneva / Alemany EBT C 0.74 29 C 0.74 29 C 0.73 29 C 0.74 29 C 0.74 29 C 0.74 29

TOTAL 173 152 159 142 132 423

2001 signalized Geneva / Phelan WBT C 0.73 30 C 0.73 30 C 0.74 30 C 0.73 30 C 0.73 29 C 0.73 331 signalized Geneva / Ocean NBL B 0.51 22 B 0.51 22 B 0.55 22 B 0.51 22 B 0.53 21 D 0.54 767 AWS Geneva / Howth WBT 0 0 4 A 0.88 4 A 0.79 4 A 0.6 0 A 0.81 4 D 1.57 48 signalized Geneva / I-280 SB Off Ramp WBT D 0.84 4 C 0.77 6 C 0.7 4 C 0.82 4 C 0.74 7 F 1.35 229 signalized Geneva / I-280 NB Off Ramp WBT E 1.1 34 D 0.97 7 C 0.81 26 D 1.03 34 C 0.69 13 F 1.36 4

10 signalized Geneva / San Jose WBT C 0.69 33 C 0.84 33 D 0.84 43 C 0.69 33 C 0.84 34 D 1.05 2011 AWS Geneva / Cayuga WBT 0 0 33 B 0.55 9 A 0.55 9 C 0.56 22 A 0.55 9 C 0.55 2012 signalized Geneva / Alemany WBT C 0.74 33 C 0.74 33 C 0.73 32 C 0.74 33 C 0.74 33 C 0.74 33

TOTAL 192 146 170 178 151 212

2001 signalized Ocean / Phelan EBT C 0.73 14 C 0.73 14 C 0.74 14 C 0.73 14 C 0.73 14 C 0.73 141 signalized Ocean / Geneva EBT B 0.51 6 B 0.51 6 B 0.55 7 B 0.51 6 B 0.53 7 D 0.54 52 signalized Ocean / Howth EBT A 0.42 3 A 0.46 3 B 0.68 20 A 0.46 3 A 0.45 3 B 0.27 13 Ocean / I-280 SB Off Ramp EBT C 0.63 30 E 1.12 444 signalized Ocean / I-280 NB On Ramp EBT D 0.85 3 C 0.7 2 D 0.79 2 D 0.85 2 F 1.2 2 A 0.3 25 signalized Ocean / San Jose EBT B 0.72 20 C 0.7 15 C 0.86 20 C 0.88 47 D 0.98 70 C 0.72 186 signalized Ocean / Alemany EBT C 0.78 24 C 0.78 24 C 0.78 24 C 0.78 24 C 0.78 24 C 0.79 24

TOTAL 69 63 87 126 163 64

2001 signalized Ocean / Phelan WBT C 0.73 30 C 0.73 30 C 0.74 30 C 0.73 30 C 0.73 29 C 0.73 331 signalized Ocean / Geneva WBT B 0.51 19 B 0.51 19 B 0.55 19 B 0.51 19 B 0.53 20 D 0.54 72 signalized Ocean / Howth WBT A 0.42 13 A 0.46 13 B 0.68 13 A 0.46 13 A 0.45 13 B 0.27 94 signalized Ocean / I-280 NB On Ramp WBT D 0.85 43 C 0.7 20 D 0.79 29 D 0.85 42 F 1.2 72 A 0.3 13 Ocean / I-280 SB Off Ramp WBT C 0.63 38 E 1.12 1035 signalized Ocean / San Jose WBT B 0.72 24 C 0.7 18 C 0.86 24 C 0.88 18 D 0.98 14 C 0.72 186 signalized Ocean / Alemany WBT C 0.78 25 C 0.78 25 C 0.78 25 C 0.78 25 C 0.78 25 C 0.79 25

TOTAL 153 124 139 184 277 94

2001 signalized Ocean / Phelan EBT C 0.73 14 C 0.73 14 C 0.74 14 C 0.73 14 C 0.73 14 C 0.73 141 signalized Ocean / Geneva EBT B 0.51 6 B 0.51 6 B 0.55 7 B 0.51 6 B 0.53 7 D 0.54 52 signalized Ocean / Howth EBT A 0.42 3 A 0.46 3 B 0.68 20 A 0.46 3 A 0.45 3 B 0.27 13 signalized Ocean / I-280 SB Off Ramp EBT C 0.63 30 E 1.12 444 signalized Ocean / I-280 NB On Ramp EBR D 0.85 0 C 0.7 0 D 0.79 0 D 0.85 0 F 1.2 0 A 0.3 0

TOTAL 23 23 41 53 68 20

2001 signalized Ocean / Phelan WBT C 0.73 30 C 0.73 30 C 0.74 30 C 0.73 30 C 0.73 29 C 0.73 331 signalized Ocean / Geneva WBT B 0.51 19 B 0.51 19 B 0.55 19 B 0.51 19 B 0.53 20 D 0.54 72 signalized Ocean / Howth WBT A 0.42 13 A 0.46 13 B 0.68 13 A 0.46 13 A 0.45 13 B 0.27 93 signalized Ocean / I-280 SB Off Ramp WBT C 0.63 38 E 1.12 1034 signalized Ocean / I-280 NB On Ramp NBT D 0.85 75 C 0.7 51 D 0.79 78 D 0.85 53 F 1.2 59 A 0.3 46

TOTAL 136 113 140 153 225 96

5 signalized Ocean / San Jose NBT B 0.72 14 C 0.7 21 C 0.86 15 C 0.88 20 D 0.98 32 C 0.72 15TOTAL 14 21 15 20 32 15

5 signalized Ocean / San Jose SBT B 0.72 20 C 0.7 30 C 0.86 19 C 0.88 31 D 0.98 68 C 0.72 18TOTAL 20 30 19 31 68 18

Transit DelayGeneva Ave PM Eastbound Existing Baseline Alternative 1, Element 1 Alternative 1, Element 2 Alternative 1, Element 4 Alternative 2

Geneva Ave PM Westbound Existing Baseline Alternative 1, Element 1 Alternative 1, Element 2 Alternative 1, Element 4 Alternative 2

Ocean Ave PM Eastbound Existing Baseline Alternative 1, Element 1 Alternative 1, Element 2 Alternative 1, Element 4 Alternative 2

Alternative 2

K Ingleside PM Eastbound Existing Baseline Alternative 1, Element 1 Alternative 1, Element 2 Alternative 1, Element 4 Alternative 2

Ocean Ave PM Westbound Existing Baseline Alternative 1, Element 1 Alternative 1, Element 2 Alternative 1, Element 4

Alternative 2

J Church PM Northbound Existing Baseline Alternative 1, Element 1 Alternative 1, Element 2 Alternative 1, Element 4 Alternative 2

K Ingleside PM Westbound Existing Baseline Alternative 1, Element 1 Alternative 1, Element 2 Alternative 1, Element 4

Alternative 2J Church PM Southbound Existing Baseline Alternative 1, Element 1 Alternative 1, Element 2 Alternative 1, Element 4

Page 120: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

Geneva Ave PM

Eastbound

Geneva Ave PM

Westbound

Ocean Ave PM

Eastbound

Ocean Ave PM

Westbound

K Ingleside PM

Eastbound

K Ingleside PM

Westbound

J Church PM Northbound

J Church PM Southbound

Existing 02:53 03:12 01:09 02:33 00:23 02:16 00:14 00:20Baseline 02:32 02:25 01:03 02:04 00:23 01:53 00:21 00:30Alternative 1, Element 1 02:39 02:50 01:27 02:19 00:41 02:20 00:15 00:19Alternative 1, Element 2 02:22 02:58 02:06 03:04 00:53 02:33 00:20 00:31Alternative 1, Element 4 02:12 02:31 02:43 04:37 01:07 03:45 00:32 01:08Alternative 2 07:03 03:32 01:04 01:34 00:20 01:36 00:14 00:18--- 02:22 02:58 02:06 02:43 00:53 02:58 00:20 00:31

Transit DelayTransit Delay Summary Table

00:00

02:00

04:00

06:00

08:00

Existing Baseline Alternative 1,Element 1

Alternative 1,Element 2

Alternative 1,Element 4

Alternative 2

bus

dela

y -

min

utes

Geneva Ave PM Eastbound Geneva Ave PM Westbound

Ocean Ave PM Eastbound Ocean Ave PM Westbound

Page 121: Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study · Balboa Park Station Area Circulation Study April 2014 FINAL REPORT APPENDIX A TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

Queuing and Blocking ReportAlternative 1-Element 4 PM 3/6/2014

Balboa Park Circulation Study SimTraffic ReportFehr & Peers Page 1

Intersection: 2: Ocean & Howth

Movement EB EB WB WB NB SBDirections Served T T T TR LTR LRMaximum Queue (ft) 415 444 112 115 119 139Average Queue (ft) 380 377 56 68 70 4595th Queue (ft) 469 503 99 118 124 102Link Distance (ft) 381 381 394 394 104 201Upstream Blk Time (%) 72 59 4Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0Storage Bay Dist (ft)Storage Blk Time (%)Queuing Penalty (veh)

Intersection: 3: Ocean &

Movement EB EB WB SB SBDirections Served T TR T L TRMaximum Queue (ft) 424 466 250 375 2700Average Queue (ft) 411 316 232 349 253795th Queue (ft) 424 479 243 418 3053Link Distance (ft) 394 394 212 2671Upstream Blk Time (%) 51 9 59 60Queuing Penalty (veh) 242 42 368 0Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350Storage Blk Time (%) 74 11Queuing Penalty (veh) 808 11

Intersection: 4: Ocean & I-280 On Ramp

Movement EB EB WB WB NB SBDirections Served L TR L TR LT LMaximum Queue (ft) 231 27 65 329 287 30Average Queue (ft) 220 1 8 312 287 695th Queue (ft) 228 9 39 320 287 24Link Distance (ft) 212 212 295 294 427Upstream Blk Time (%) 70 70 100Queuing Penalty (veh) 371 0 0Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100Storage Blk Time (%) 68 100Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 92

Network SummaryNetwork wide Queuing Penalty: 1941