BBA, MBA, and EMBA Program Student Learning Assessment ... 2017 SLAR.pdf · Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA Program (Common Program Learning Goals and Student Learning

BBA, MBA, and EMBA Program Student Learning Assessment Report: Fall 2017

2

Contents Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA Program .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3

Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Accounting and Finance ............................................................................................................................................ 12

Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in HRM Program ........................................................................................................................................................... 22

Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in International Business (“INB”) ................................................................................................................................ 32

Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in MIS Program ............................................................................................................................................................. 42

Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Marketing (“MKT”) .................................................................................................................................................. 52

Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: Master of Business Administration ............................................................................................................................................ 62

Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: Executive Master of Business Administration ........................................................................................................................... 73

3

Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA Program (Common Program Learning Goals and Student Learning Outcomes for all BBA Disciplines)

Program

Learning Goal

Student Learning

Outcome Measure Measurement Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop

1. Communications 1.1 Communicate

ideas and

arguments

effectively

Summative: Exit

Assessment Test, and

Course Embedded

Assessment (MGT

489, integrative

capstone course group

term projects).

Formative: Course

Embedded

Assessment(MGT 368

group term projects)

Exit Assessment Test:

Meets Expectation: 60%

to 80%; Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%;

Exceeds Expectation >

80%

Course-Embedded

Assessment: Rubric #

B.1.1.1.1

See

Figures

BBA

Core 1 –

4.

Target: 80% of students should

meet or exceed expectation.

Students met the target

Trend: Students show an

improving trend in formative

assessment with a significant

increase in percentage of students

exceeding expectation. However in

summative assessment percentage

of students not meeting expectation

is showing an increasing trend.

Department of English and Modern

Languages continued their Discourse

series for students in Fall 2017. Well-

known authors were invited to talk

about writing process and the craft of

writing.

Figure BBA Core- 1 Figure BBA Core- 2

72.83

17.279.91

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA Core PLG 1,SLO 1.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations

59.75

75.86 72.83

18.27

7.5617.27

21.9916.59

9.91

0

20

40

60

80

100

2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA

MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION

EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA Core PLG 1, SLO 1.1; Summative; Trend

4


70

10

20

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

tsBBA Core PLG 1, SLO 1.1; Fall 2017; Formative

M = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations

57.1462.2

70

28.5737.8

1014.29

0

20

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA Core PLG 1, SLO 1.1; Formative; Trend

5

Program

Learning

Goal

Student

Learning


2. Critical

Thinking

2.1

Correctly

apply

foundation

knowledge

gained in

BBA core

courses

for

analysis

and

decision

making

Summative: Exit Assessment Test,

and Course Embedded Assessment

(MGT 489, integrative capstone

course group term projects).

Formative: Course Embedded

Assessment from the Disciplines:

FIN 435 group term projects for

A&F students; HRM 480 group

terms projects for HRM students;

INB 480 group term projects for

INB students; MIS 470 group term

projects for MIS students; and

MKT 460 group term projects for

MKT students

Exit Assessment Test: Meets

Expectation: 60% to 80%; Does

Not Meet Expectation < 60%;

Exceeds Expectation > 80%

Course-Embedded Assessment:

Rubric # 2.1.1.1 (summative );

A&F.4.R.2 for A&F students,

rubric # HRM.3.R.1 for HRM

students, rubric # INB.2.R.1 for

INB students, rubric #

MIS.2.R.1 for MIS students,

rubric # MKT.1.R.2 for MKT

students (formative)

See Figures

BBA Core 5

– 6.

Please see

the

following

figures for

the

formative

results:

A&F-13,

HRM-9,

INB-5, MIS-

5, MKT-1

Target: 70% students

should meet or exceed

expectations.

Students have met the

target.

Trend: The percentage

of students exceeding

expectation has

decreased over the

period with a slight

increase in percentage

of students not meeting

expectation.

Students are encouraged to take part in

business competitions like Bizmaestros

that provides students the opportunities to

present their creative minds and apply

foundation knowledge gained in academic

courses.


65.39

11.51

23.11

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA Core PLG 2, SLO 2.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations

87.37

36.75

65.39

5.360.13

11.517.27

63.14

23.11

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


6

Program Learning

Goal

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement

Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop

2. Critical Thinking 2.2. Engage in

critical thinking and

analysis of business

phenomena to realize

opportunities for

performance

improvement at all

levels

Summative: Exit


Course Embedded

Assessment (MGT

489, integrative

capstone course

group term projects).

Formative: Course

Embedded

Assessment(MGT

368 group term

projects)

Exit Assessment

Test: Meets

Expectation: 60% to

80%; Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%;

Exceeds Expectation

> 80%

Course-Embedded

Assessment: Rubric

# B.2.2.1.1

See

Figures

BBA

Core 7 –

10.



expectation.


Trend: Students

performance in formative

assessment has improved

over the period with a

sharp increase in

percentage of students

exceeding expectation.

NSU organizes different business

competitions and also encourages students to

take part in external business competitions

like Bizmaestros. These competitions

provide them a platform to present their

creative minds and apply foundation

knowledge gained in academic courses in

real business scenarios.


35.42

18.78

45.81

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


68.21

16.39

35.42

5.640.74

18.7826.16

82.88

45.81

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90



EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONP

erce

nta

ge o

f St

ud

ents


7


30

20

50

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



85.71

14.63

30

14.29

71.95

20

0

13.41

50

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


8

Program Learning

Goal

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


3. Integration 3.1 Utilize knowledge

in the areas of

accounting,

management, finance,

and marketing as

business

professionals.

Summative: Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment (MGT

489, integrative

capstone course,


Formative: Course-

Embedded

Assessment(MGT

368 group term

projects)

Exit Assessment

Test: Meets

Expectation 60% to

80%; Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%,

Exceeds Expectation

> 80%

Course-Embedded

Assessment: Rubric

# 3.1.1.1

See

Figures

BBA

Core 11

– 14.



expectation.

Students met the target in

formative assessment but

not in summative

assessment.

Trend: Students

performance has

significantly improved in

formative assessment

however performance in

summative assessment has

deteriorated.

A number of seminars and workshops were

organized by several SBE co-curricular

organizations. These seminars and workshops

featured industry leaders and experts. These

events provide key information about the

current business landscapes as well as future

issues.


35.29

26.9

37.82

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


62.81

22.34

35.29

0.96

11.23

26.936.24

66.44

37.82

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


9


40

0

60

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



71.43

25.61

40

14.29

62.2

0

14.29 12.2

60

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


10

Program

Learning

Goal

Student

Learning

Outcome

Measure Measurement Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop

3. Integration 3.2 Utilize

the latest

business

tools to

analyze

information,

to improve

productivity

and

decision-

making, and

to achieve

performance

targets

efficiently

Summative: Exit Assessment

Test, and Course-Embedded

Assessment (MGT 489,

integrative capstone course, group

term projects)

Formative: Course Embedded

Assessment from the Disciplines:

FIN 435 group term projects for

A&F students; HRM 480 group

terms projects for HRM students;

INB 480 group term projects for

INB students; MIS 470 group

term projects for MIS students;

and MKT 460 group term projects

for MKT students


Expectation: 60% to 80%;

Does Not Meet Expectation <

60%; Exceeds Expectation >

80%

Course-Embedded

Assessment: Rubric # 3.2.1.1

(summative ); A&F.4.R.2 for

A&F students, rubric #

HRM.3.R.1 for HRM

students, rubric # INB.2.R.1

for INB students, rubric #

MIS.2.R.1 for MIS students,

rubric # MKT.1.R.2 for MKT

students (formative)

See Figures

BBA Core

15 – 16.

Please see

the

following

figures for

the

formative

results:

A&F-13,

HRM-9,

INB-5,

MIS-5,

MKT-1


should meet or

exceed expectation.

Students met the

target.

Trend: Although

students have met the

target but their

performance has

deteriorated over the

period.

A number of seminars and workshops were

organized by several SBE co-curricular

organizations. These seminars and

workshops featured industry leaders and

experts. These events provide key

information about the current business

landscapes as well as future issues.


39.54

24.99

35.47

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


83.01

28.52

39.54

16.99

0.86

24.99

0

70.63

35.47

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


11

Program Learning

Goal

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


4. Ethics 4.1 Uphold ethical

standards in every

professional practice

Summative: Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment (MGT

489, integrative

capstone course,


Exit Assessment

Test: Meets

Expectation 60% to

80%; Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%,

Exceeds Expectation

> 80%

Course-Embedded

Assessment: Rubric

# 4.1.1.1

See

Figures

BBA

Core 17 -

18

Target: 80% students should meet or

exceed expectation.

Students failed to meet the target

Trend: There is an increase in

percentage of students not meeting

expectation. This is an area of concern.

NSU Ethics club organizes

different seminars to make

students aware about ethical

standards.


68.25

27.27

4.49

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


93.19

15

68.25

6.81

21.627.27

0

63.41

4.49

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


12

Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Accounting and Finance

Figure A&F 1 Figure A&F 2

66.13

9.33

24.55

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in A&F, SLO 1, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation

55.51

43.68

66.13

16.11 16.519.33

28.4

39.81

24.55

0

20

40

60

80

100

2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA


EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in A&F, SLO 1, Summative, Trend

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement

Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop

A&F.1. Identify and

classify financial

information; present

and interpret financial

statements

Summative: - Exit


Course Embedded

Assessment (FIN 440,

Capstone Course


Formative: Course

Embedded-

Assessment (FIN 254


Exit Assessment Test

Meets Expectation:

60% -80%

Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%

Exceeds Expectation>

80%

Course-Embedded


A&F.1.R.1

See Figures

A&F 1 – 4.

Target: 80% students should meet or, exceed

expectation.

Students met the target.

Trend: Students performance has improved

over the period.

As a part of standardized syllabus all

students of FIN 440 are given a project that

requires them to work in teams on financial

statements that demonstrates practical

application of income statement, balance

sheet and cash flows. They interpret these

financial statements using appropriate

financial tools.

13


41.56

7.79

50.65

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

tsBBA in A&F, SLO 1, Formative, Fall 2017

M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation

65.05

51.3841.56

5.83

16.317.79

29.13 32.31

50.65

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in A&F, SLO 1, Formative, Trend

14

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


A&F.2. Explain cost

concepts and its

classification and

apply this in

budgeting for specific

business situations.

Summative: - Exit

Assessment Test

Formative: Course-

Embedded

Assessment (ACT

202 examinations)


Meets Expectation:

60% -80%

Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%


80%

Course-Embedded


A&F.2.R.1

(formative),

A&F.2.R.2

(summative)

See Figures

A&F 5 – 8.


expectation.


Trend: Overall students‟ performance in this

area is very impressive with significant

percentage of students exceeding expectation.

Courses have been standardized in terms of

content, sequence of coverage, grading, use

of text book and other learning resources to

ensure students learning outcomes are

achieved.


29.7

1.98

68.32

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


53.08

0

29.7

2.31 0.71 1.98

44.62

99.29

68.32

0

20

40

60

80

100




erce

nta

ge o

f St

ud

ents


15


41.56

7.79

50.65

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



65.05

51.3841.56

5.83

16.317.79

29.13 32.31

50.65

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


16

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


A&F.3. Be able to

apply best investment

strategy by analyzing

various investment

options.

Summative: - Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment

(FIN 440, Capstone

Course, group term

projects)

Formative: Course-

Embedded

Assessment (FIN 254



Meets Expectation:

60% -80%

Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%


80%

Course-Embedded


A&F.3.R.1

(formative),

A&F.3.R.2

(summative)

See Figures

A&F 9 – 12.

Target: 80% students should meet or,

exceed expectation.

Student met the target.


over the period.

NSU Finance club organized a financial modeling

competition, Blueprint 3.0 in Fall 2017 that allowed

students to apply their technical financial skills in

practical scenarios.


15.23 17.66

67.12

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


46.71

31.26

15.23 15.23 13.3217.66

38.06

55.42

67.12

0

20

40

60

80

100




erce

nta

ge o

f St

ud

ents


17


49.78

6.49

43.72

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



68.63

51.03 49.78

10.46

22.07

6.49

20.9226.9

43.72

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


18

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


A&F.4. Be able to

calculate and measure

risks and its

application in

portfolio

management.

Summative: - Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment

(FIN 435, Capstone

Course, group term

projects)

Formative: Course

Embedded-

Assessment (FIN 254



Meets Expectation:

60% -80%

Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%


80%

Course-Embedded


A&F.4.R.1

(formative),

A&F.4.R.2

(summative)

See Figures

A&F 13 – 16.


exceed expectation.

Students failed to meet the target in

formative assessment.

Trend: Students performance in summative

assessment has significantly improved over

the period. However performance in

formative assessment is alarming There is a

high jump in the percentage of students not

meeting the expectation. This is an area of

major concern.

The department faculty mentored students in

financial modeling so that they can take part in the

inter university financial modeling competition,

Blueprint 3.0 organized by NSU finance club.


36.58

5.9

57.53

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


45.1

22.75

36.58

12.79

61.53

5.9

42.12

15.73

57.53

0

20

40

60

80

100




erce

nta

ge o

f St

ud

ents


19


44.16 45.45

10.39

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



65.36

43.97 44.16

19.6128.34

45.45

15.03

27.69

10.39

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


20

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


A&F.5. Utilize

technology to analyze

financial information

and to facilitate

accounting and

financial reporting

process.

Summative: - Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment

(FIN 440, Capstone

Course, group term

projects)

Formative: Course-

Embedded

Assessment (FIN 254



Meets Expectation:

60% -80%

Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%


80%

Course-Embedded


A&F.5.R.1

See Figures A&F 17 –

20.


exceed expectation.


Trend: Overall students have shown

good performance in both formative and

summative assessment.

The department emphasizes on the

application of technology in the formative

courses offered by the department.


59.58

16.9223.52

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


47.67

24.38

59.58

13.7 15.21 16.92

38.65

60.42

23.52

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


21


65.8

9.52

24.68

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



69.28

50.71

65.8

7.1914.89

9.52

23.53

34.424.68

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


22

Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in HRM Program

Figure HRM 1 Figure HRM 2

10.34

0

89.66

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in HRM, SLO 1, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100

55.56

10.34

0 0 0 0

44.44

89.66

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in HRM, SLO 1, Summative, Trend

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement

Criteria Results Observation Closing the Loop

1. Understand the

Human Resource

Management concepts

and theories, and is

able to apply these

core knowledge in

managing

organizations.

Summative:

Exit Assessment Test,

and Course

Embedded

Assessment

(HRM480 group term

projects)

Formative:

Course Embedded

Assessment

(MGT351 group term

projects)


Meets Expectation:

60% to 80%

Does Not Meet

Expectation: <60%

Exceeds Expectation:

>80%

Course-Embedded

Assessment:

Rubric # HRM.1.R.1

See Figures

HRM 1 – 4.

Target: 80% students should meet or exceed

expectation.


Trend: Overall student performance has

improved over time. We are very pleased

with the results from both formative and

summative assessment as there is an

increase in the percentage of students

exceeding expectation.

Course components are constantly reviewed to

ensure the student learning outcomes are met.

23


27.78

0

72.22

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

tsBBA in HRM, SLO 1, Formative, Fall 2017


11.76

51.43

27.78

0 0 0

88.24

48.57

72.22

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in HRM, SLO 1, Formative, Trend

24

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


2. Understand the

concepts underlying

effective interpersonal

relations and

group/team leadership

skills.

Summative:


and Course

Embedded

Assessment

(HRM480 group term

projects)

Formative:

Course Embedded

Assessment (MGT351



Meets Expectation:

60% to 80%

Does Not Meet

Expectation: <60%


>80%

Course-Embedded


HRM.2.R.1

See Figures HRM 5 –

8.

Target: 75% students should meet

or exceed expectation.


Trend: Student performance has

significantly improved over the

period, especially in summative

assessment.

Career and Placement Center

(CPC) of North South University arranged a session

called "Learn to Lead" in collaboration with

Unilever Bangladesh. It was a very informative

session where the HR Director at Unilever

Bangladesh, Mr. Kunal Sharma, spoke about the

Unilever Future Leaders Program and shared tips on

becoming a good leader.


24.14

0

75.86

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in HRM, SLO 2, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation

75

22.22 24.14

0

66.67

0

25

11.11

75.86

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


25


77.78

0

22.22

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



64.71

37.14

77.78

35.29

11.43

0 0

51.43

22.22

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


26

Student Learning

Outcomes Measure

Measurement


3. Understand and are

able to integrate

Strategic Human

Resource Management

(“SHRM”) concepts in

the context of

management of

organizations.

Summative:


and Course

Embedded

Assessment

(HRM480 group term

projects)

Formative:

Course Embedded

Assessment (MGT351



Meets Expectation:

60% to 80%

Does Not Meet

Expectation: <60%


>80%

Course Embedded


HRM.3.R.1

See Figures HRM 9 –

12.

Target: 65% students should



Trend: Student performance is

showing a positive trend. In

summative assessment the

percentage of students exceeding

expectation has increased

showing a very positive trend.

Courses have been standardized in terms of content,

sequence of coverage, grading, use of text book and

other learning resources to ensure students learning

outcomes are achieved.


13.79

0

86.21

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


55

77.78

13.795 7.41

0

40

14.81

86.21

0

20

40

60

80

100




erce

nta

ge o

f St

ud

ents


27


55.56

5.56

38.89

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



67.65

20

55.56

11.762.86 5.56

20.59

77.14

38.89

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


28

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


4. Be familiar with the

application of HRM

functional capabilities

to select, recruit,

motivate, and retain

employees.

Summative:


and Course

Embedded

Assessment

(HRM480 group term

projects)

Formative:

Course Embedded

Assessment (MGT351



Meets Expectation:

60% to 80%

Does Not Meet

Expectation: <60%


>80%

Course-Embedded


HRM.4.R.1

See Figures HRM 13

– 16.




Trend: Students performance has

improved over the period.

In Fall 2017 NSU Human Resource Club hosted the

event “HR Speaks Out 2.0”. The purpose of this

event was to connect aspiring business students

with the illustrious industry representatives so that

the students get familiarized with the contemporary

HR issues and are able to put the theories into

practice. The topics for the discussions were

recruitment, selection and leadership.


96.55

3.450

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in HRM, SLO 4, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 95

62.96

96.55

0

37.04

3.45 50 0

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


29


44.44

0

55.56

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



26.47

80

44.44

0 0 0

73.53

20

55.56

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


30

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


5. Demonstrate their

understanding of

compensation practices

and tools of benefit in

the context of

Bangladesh, and are

able to demonstrate

application using

quantitative methods.

Summative:


and Course

Embedded

Assessment

(HRM480 group term

projects)

Formative:

Course Embedded

Assessment (MGT351



Meets Expectation:

60% to 80%

Does Not Meet

Expectation: <60%


>80%

Course-Embedded


HRM.5.R.1

See Figure HRM 17 –

20.




Trend: Students performance

has improved over the period.

NSU organizes different business competitions and

also encourages students to take part in external

business competitions like Bizmaestros. These

competitions provide them a platform to present

their creative minds and apply foundation

knowledge gained in academic courses in real

business scenarios.


100

0 00

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


60

25.93

100

40

74.07

0 0 0 00

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


31


22.22 22.22

55.56

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



44.12

60

22.22

0 0

22.22

55.88

40

55.56

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


32

`Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in International Business (“INB”) Student Learning

Outcomes Measure Measurement Criteria Results Status Closing the Loop

1. Demonstrate an

understanding of global

cultural knowledge through

a) the identification of major

components of international

business and b) explanation

of how cultural and national

differences affect the

conduct of business.

Summative- Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment (INB 480 group

term projects)

Formative: Course-

Embedded Assessment (INB

372 case studies)


expectations- 60% to 80%,

Does Not Meet expectations-

< 60%, Meets expectations->

80%.

Course-Embedded


INB.1.R.1 (formative), and

rubric # INB.1.R.2

(summative)

See Figures

INB 1 – 4.

Target: 80% of the students should

meet and exceed the expectations

of SLO1.


formative assessment but failed to

meet the target in summative

assessment.


deteriorated over the periods in

summative assessment with an


not meeting expectation. This is an

area of concern.

The department uses interactive and

up to date classroom activities that

enhance students‟ participation in the

class.

Figure INB- 1 Figure INB- 2

37.7530.5 31.75

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in INB, SLO 1, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation

5040 37.75

0

13.34

30.5

50 46.67

31.75

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in INB, SLO 1, Summative, Trend

33


52.94

3.92

43.14

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in INB, SLO 1, Formative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation

47.6237.72

52.94

5.56 4.39 3.92

46.83

57.89

43.14

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in INB, SLO 1, Formative, Trend

34

Student Learning

Outcomes Measure

Measurement

Criteria Results Status Closing the Loop

2. Demonstrate

working knowledge

in the area of

marketing, finance

and management

from a business

perspective in an

international

context.

Summative: - Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment (INB 480


Formative: Course-

Embedded Assessment

(INB 372 case studies)


Meets expectations-

60% to 80%, Does

Not Meet

expectations-< 60/%,

Meets expectations->

80%

Course-Embedded

Assessment: Rubric

# INB.2.R.1

See Figures

INB 5 – 8.

Target: 80% of the students should meet and

exceed the expectations of SLO2.



over the period in summative assessment.

Interactive assignments and student

presentations on relevant topics, introduction of

new case based assignments have a positive

impact on students‟ performance.


37

0

63

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


18.75 20

37

0

40

0

81.25

40

63

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


35


47.52

13.86

38.61

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

tsBBA in INB, SLO 2, Formative, Fall 2017


47.62 49.56 47.52

8.73 5.3113.86

43.65 45.1338.61

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


36

Student Learning


3. Assess factors

that determine

international trade

patterns & capital

flows and the impact

of international

institutions on

global business

operations.

Summative- Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment (INB 480


Formative: Course-

Embedded Assessment



Meets expectations- 60%

to 80%, Does Not Meet

expectations-< 60%, Meets

expectations-> 80%.

Course-Embedded


INB.3.R.1

See Figures

INB 9 – 12.


meet and exceed the expectations of

SLO3.


Trend: Students performance is

positive and consistent over the

periods.

Courses have been standardized in terms of

content, sequence of coverage, grading, use of

text book and other learning resources.


52.75

9.75

37.5

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


51.2

16.67

52.75

3.13

13.34 9.75

45.68

70

37.5

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


37


54.46

7.92

37.62

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



50 50.43 54.46

7.14 7.69 7.92

42.86 41.8837.62

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


38

Student Learning


4. Identify the

international

competitiveness of

nations and their

attractiveness for

international

business.

Summative- Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment (INB 480


Formative: Course-

Embedded Assessment






expectations-> 80%.

Course-Embedded


INB.4.R.1

See Figures 13

– 16.

Target: 80% of the students should meet

and exceed the expectations of SLO3.


Trend: Students performance is positive

and consistent over the periods.

The Marketing Club of North South

University (TMC) hosted six interactive

grooming sessions with six different guest

speakers, each being the leader of his/her

professional field. The sessions aimed to

bridge the gap between corporate leaders and

marketing enthusiasts.


67.25

9

23.75

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


62.26

73.3467.25

0

13.349

37.74

13.34

23.75

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


39


59.41

9.9

30.69

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



59.5252.63

59.41

7.14 7.89 9.9

33.3339.47

30.69

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


40

Student Learning


5. Exhibit critical

thinking skills to

ethically address

complex real-world

international

business.

Summative- Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment (INB 480


Formative: Course-

Embedded Assessment






expectations-> 80%.

Course-Embedded


INB.5.R.1

See Figures

INB 17 – 20.

Target: 100% of the students should meet and

exceed the expectations of SLO5.

Students failed to meet the target.


assessment has deteriorated over the period with

an increase in percentage of students not meeting

expectation. This is an area of concern.

Courses have been standardized in

terms of content, sequence of coverage,

grading, use of text book and other

learning resources.

Continuation of the use of the software

“Turn it in” in order to ensure

credibility of students work. Workshops

are held for faculties to give them idea

about the software and how to use it.


54

2125

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


21.88

10

54

17.79

3.34

21

60.34

86.67

25

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


41

Figure INB- 19 Figure INB- 20xx

54

4

42

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



46.8351.75 54

8.733.51 4

44.44 44.74 42

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


42

Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in MIS Program

Figure MIS 1 Figure MIS 2

43.75

18.75

37.5

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in MIS, SLO 1, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation

66.67

9.09

43.75

04.55

18.75

33.34 36.37 37.5

0

20

40

60

80

100




erce

nta

ge o

f St

ud

ents

BBA in MIS, SLO 1, Summative, Trend

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


1. Apply managerial

concepts and decision

theories to use

enterprise information

systems.

Summative:


and Course

Embedded

Assessment (MIS470


Formative:

Course Embedded

Assessment (MIS205



Meets Expectation:

60% to 80%

Does Not Meet

Expectation: <60%


>80%

Course-Embedded


MIS.1.R.1

See Figures MIS 1 –

4.

Target: 80% students should meet or

exceed expectation.


Trend: Although students met the

target performance in summative

assessment has deteriorated with

increase in percentage of students not

meeting expectation.

Up to date business case studies related to

enterprise information systems were practiced in

different MIS courses, so that students are able

to apply these concepts in solving complex

decision problems.

43


50

0

50

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

tsBBA in MIS, SLO 1, Formative, Fall 2017


66.67

37.5

50

0 0 0

33.33

62.5

50

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in MIS, SLO 1, Formative, Trend

44

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


2. Demonstrate the

understanding about

systems theory,

systems analysis,

systems design and

project management.

Summative:


and Course

Embedded

Assessment (MIS470


Formative:

Course Embedded

Assessment (MIS205



Meets Expectation:

60% to 80%

Does Not Meet

Expectation: <60%


>80%

Course-Embedded


MIS.2.R.1

See Figures MIS 5 –

8.






assessment has deteriorated with


not meeting expectation

Course components are constantly reviewed to

ensure that students can continue to critically

identify problems and solve those using their

knowledge of business studies.


6.25

18.75

75

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


50

4.55 6.250

4.55

18.75

5040.91

75

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


45


40

0

60

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



50

12.5

40

0 0 0

50

87.5

60

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


46

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


3. Exhibit the

knowledge on web-

based information

systems in business

context.

Summative:


and Course

Embedded

Assessment (MIS470


Formative:

Course Embedded

Assessment (MIS205



Meets Expectation:

60% to 80%

Does Not Meet

Expectation: <60%


>80%

Course-Embedded


MIS.3.R.1

See

Figures

MIS 9 –

12.


expectation.


Trend: Students performance has improved over

time

Cases and Laboratory tasks on web-based

information systems (e.g., e-business, e-

commerce) are practiced in the classes of

relevant MIS courses


2518.75

56.25

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


16.67 13.64

25

50

4.55

18.75

33.34 31.82

56.25

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


47


50

0

50

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



33.33

6.25

50

0 0 0

66.67

93.75

50

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


48

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


4. Develop and

implement

information systems

with the help of latest

business tools.

Summative:


and Course

Embedded

Assessment (MIS470


Formative:

Course Embedded

Assessment (MIS205



Meets Expectation:

60% to 80%

Does Not Meet

Expectation: <60%


>80%

Course-Embedded


MIS.4.R.1

See

Figures

MIS 13

– 16.


expectation.



over time

Pre-selected business application tools are used in

building or assessing different Information Systems

in different MIS course-projects.


68.75

6.25

25

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


0

27.28

68.75

50

18.18

6.25

50

4.55

25

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


49


40

10

50

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den


M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100

18.75

40

0 010

0

81.25

50

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


50

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


5. Illustrate the

familiarity about

computer networks

and security concepts.

Summative:


and Course

Embedded

Assessment (MIS470


Formative:

Course Embedded

Assessment (MIS205



Meets Expectation:

60% to 80%

Does Not Meet

Expectation: <60%


>80%

Course-Embedded


MIS.5.R.1

See

Figures

MIS 17

– 20.


expectation.


Trend: Students performance has improved over

time

Along with real world Cases, team activities

and problem solving exercises on „IS privacy,

security, and protective measures‟ were done in

the classes in related MIS courses, so that there

was sufficient coverage on these topics, and

students can identify and solve different

security issues and network threats.


81.25

6.2512.5

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


33.34

22.73

81.25

50

4.55 6.25

16.6722.73

12.5

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


51


20

10

70

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



50

18.75 20

0 010

50

81.25

70

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


52

Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Marketing (“MKT”) Student Learning

Outcomes Measure Measurement Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop

1. Demonstrate a thorough

understanding of the

marketing management

process including marketing

strategy formulation and

marketing plan

implementation

Summative- Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment (MKT 460

group term projects.)

Formative- Course-

Embedded Assessment

(MKT 337 group term

projects)


Expectations- 60% to 80%,

Does Not Meet

Expectations-< 60%,

Exceeds Expectations-> 80%

Course-Embedded


MKT.1.R.1 (formative), and

rubric # MKT.1.R.2

(summative)

See

Figures

MKT 1

– 4.


meet and exceed the expectations

of SLO1.



improved over time.

The regular lecture-based classes were

augmented via several interactive seminars

and workshops which improved student

understanding of the marketing

management process.

Figure MKT- 1 Figure MKT- 2

44

2.22

53.78

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in Marketing, SLO 1, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation

43.74

67.34

44

8.2 7.432.22

48.07

25.24

53.78

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in Marketing, SLO 1, Summative, Trend

53


36.36

2.27

61.36

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

tsBBA in Marketing, SLO 1, Formative, Fall 2017


39.66

57.14

36.36

5.17 4.76 2.27

55.17

38.1

61.36

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts

BBA in Marketing, SLO 1, Formative, Trend

54

Student Learning


2. Understand the roles of

different areas of Marketing

Communications.

Summative- Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment (MKT 460


Formative: Course-

Embedded Assessment

(MKT 337 group term

projects)



Does Not Meet

Expectations-< 60%,

Exceeds expectations-> 80%

Course-Embedded


MKT.2.R.1

See Figures

MKT 5 – 8.


meet and exceed the expectations of

SLO2


Trend: Student performance has

significantly improved over time.

The Marketing Club of North South

University has always tried to build

good communication between

corporate leaders and marketing

enthusiasts. With this goal in mind,

they hosted six interactive grooming

sessions, collectively named

"Elemental,” with six different guest

speakers, each being the leader of

his/her professional field.


30

0.67

69.34

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


53.23

34.8830

3.63 3.81 0.67

43.15

61.3269.34

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


55


22.22

0

77.78

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



46.55 44.44

22.22

5.17

24.07

0

48.28

31.48

77.78

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


56

Student Learning


3. Apply concepts of

consumer behavior to

develop marketing strategy.

Summative: - Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment (MKT 460


Formative: Course-

Embedded Assessment

(MKT 337 group term

projects)



Does Not Meet

Expectations-< 60%,

Exceeds Expectations->

80%.

Course-Embedded


MKT.3.R.1

See Figures

9 – 12.

Target- 75% of the students

should be able to meet and exceed

the expectation of SLO3.




assessment is showing a negative

trend with an increase in

percentage of students not


Three marketing specialists were invited

this semester to equip the participants

with knowledge related to the topic of

“Customer Loyalty & Customer Value

Management”.


48.45

14.45

37.11

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


35.3244.49 48.45

4.880.24

14.45

59.8155.28

37.11

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


57


40

4.44

55.56

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



43.147.37

40

6.9 7.02 4.44

5045.61

55.56

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


58

Student Learning


4. Demonstrate skills to

critically analyze a problem,

design and implement

appropriate solutions.

Summative: - Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment (MKT 460


Formative:- Course-

Embedded Assessment

(MKT 337 group term

projects)



Does Not Meet

Expectations-< 60%,

Exceeds Expectations-> 80%

Course-Embedded


MKT.4.R.1 (formative), and

rubric # MKT.4.R.2

(summative)

See

Figures 13

– 16.

Target- 80% of the

students should be able

to meet and exceed the

expectation of SLO4.


Trend: Student

performance is

improving over time.

Final year students of MKT 460, Strategic

Marketing, were immersed in an hour-long lecture

on Innovation, conducted by Mr. Subhajit Mandol,

Director, LumenLab of MetLife Innovation

Centre, Singapore. The students benefitted

immensely from the experience of connecting with

an industry expert.


66

7.34

26.67

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


41.87

76.12

66

5.63 3.5 7.34

52.5

20.426.67

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


59


35.56

8.89

55.56

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



37.9332.14 35.56

13.79 10.71 8.89

48.2857.14 55.56

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


60

Student Learning


5. Practice and set examples

on responsible and ethical

marketing.

Summative: Exit Assessment

Test, and Course-Embedded

Assessment (MKT 460


Formative: Course-

Embedded Assessment

(MKT 337 group term

projects)



Does Not Meet expectations-

< 60%, Exceeds

Expectations-> 80%

Course-Embedded


MKT.5.R.1

See Figure 17

– 20.

Target- 100% of the students

should be able to meet and

exceed the expectation of

SLO5.


Trend: Although students

could not meet the target there

is an improving trend in the

student performance.

Marketing and International Business

Department conducted a workshop titled

“Measuring Performance Management &

Marketing in Business Environment” as

part of the Awareness Building Workshop

in Fall 2017. The workshop was

facilitated by Mr. Md. Arif Uddin,

Director, Head of Business Performance

Management, Grameenphone Ltd. and

Mr. Golam Mortuza Chowdhury, Deputy

Director, Head of Revenue Assurance &

Fraud Management, Grameenphone Ltd.


25.56

5.78

68.67

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


22.11

59.54

25.56

3.82 1.185.78

74.08

39.29

68.67

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


61


51.11

4.44

44.44

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den



50

33.93

51.11

12.075.36 4.44

37.93

60.71

44.44

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEEDS EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

of

Stu

den

ts


62

Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: Master of Business Administration

Program

Learning Goal

Student

Learning


1. Managerial

Communications

1.1 Communicate

effectively

toward

achieving

managerial

objectives.

Summative: Exit

Assessment Test,

and Course-

Embedded

Assessment (BUS

690 final term

projects)

Formative: Course-

Embedded

Assessment (BUS

650 final term

projects)

Assessment Tests: Meets

Expectation: 60% -80%; Does

Not Meet Expectation < 60%;

Exceeds Expectation> 80%

Course-Embedded


MB.1.1.1.1

See

Figures

MBA- 1

through

MBA-4


expectation.

Students failed to meet the target in the

summative assessment.


assessment is a major area of concern. There

is an increase in percentage of students not

meeting the expectation.

Department of English and

Modern Languages arranged

a Colloquium series for the

students. Well-known

Bangladeshi authors were

invited to talk about writing

process and the craft of

writing.

Figure MBA - 1 Figure MBA - 2

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

MBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation

43.18

61.91

52.56

20.9

34.0941.19

35.92

4 6.25

0

20

40

60

80



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents

MBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Summative; Trend

63


100

0 00

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents

MBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Fall 2017; FormativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations

55.5666.67

100

0 0 0

44.4433.33

00

20

40

60

80

100

120



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents

MBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Formative; Trend

64

Program

Learning Goal

Student

Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


2. Critical

Thinking and

Decision

Making

2.1 Apply

appropriate

analytic

framework to

solving

management

problems, and

developing of

integrative

managerial

solutions.

Summative: Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment (BUS 690

final term projects)

Formative: Course-

Embedded Assessment

(BUS 650 final term

projects)


Expectation: 60% -80%;

Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%;


80%

Course-Embedded


MB.2.1.1.1

See

Figures

MBA-5

through

MBA-8


or, exceed expectation.

Students failed to meet the target in

the summative assessment.

Trend: Student performance in

summative assessment is very

poor. This is a major area of

concern as the students are

consistently failing to meet the

target.

NSU has taken significant steps

towards improving students learning

experience. These include

establishing a Business Advisory

Board, arranging MoU with the

Foreign Ministry, updating its

curriculum to an international

standard, equipping the CPC office,

engaging with the EHS+ Center, and

creating other offices of excellence

for closer engagement with different

industries.


0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E


51.45

39.57

51.53

37.25

46.43 47.94

11.314

0.530

20

40

60



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


65


93.75

06.25

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


55.56

66.67

93.75

0 0 0

44.44

33.33

6.25

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


66

Program

Learning Goal

Student

Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


2. Critical

Thinking and

Decision

Making

2.2 Determine

relevant

decision

criteria and

alternatives,

and identify

the optimal

solution

Summative: Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment (BUS 690


Formative: Course-

Embedded Assessment

(BUS 650 final term

projects)



Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%;


80%

Course-Embedded


MB.2.1.1.1

See

Figures

MBA-9

through

MBA-12


or, exceed expectation.


in the summative assessment.

Trend: Students failed to meet

the target in summative

assessment. The percentage of

students not meeting target is

increasing. This is an area of

significant concern

NSU has taken significant steps

towards improving students learning

experience. This include establishing a

Business Advisory Board, arranging

MoU with the Foreign Ministry,

updating its curriculum to an

international standard, equipping the

CPC office, engaging with the EHS+

Center, and creating other offices of

excellence for closer engagement with

different industries.


0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E


54.48 54.7849.93

39.27

31.22

50.07

6.25

14

00

20

40

60



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


67


100

0 00

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


55.5666.67

100

0 0 0

44.4433.33

00

20

40

60

80

100

120



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


68

Program

Learning Goal Student Learning Outcome Measure

Measurement


3. Integration of

management

tools and

techniques

3.1 Integrate and apply the tools

and techniques of

management, drawing on a

broad-based knowledge of

the major functions

(accounting, economics,

finance, information

systems, marketing,

operations management, and

strategy) to solve complex

management problems and

render sound business

decisions.

Summative: Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment (BUS

690 final term

projects)

Formative: Course-

Embedded

Assessment (BUS

650 final term

projects)

Assessment Tests:

Meets

Expectation: 60%

-80%; Does Not

Meet Expectation

< 60%; Exceeds

Expectation> 80%

Course-Embedded

Assessment:

Rubric #

MB.3.1.1.1

See

Figures

MBA-13

through

MBA-16


meet or, exceed expectation.


in the summative assessment.

Trend: Student performance in


poor. This is a major area of

concern as the students are

consistently failing to meet the

target

North South University held

“Career Fair 2017” to welcome

notable organizations from all over

the country and give its students an

opportunity to understand what the

job market is looking for.


0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E


57.5150.78

60.77

32.7 35.22 36.1

9.7914

3.13

0

20

40

60

80



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


69


87.5

0

12.5

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


55.56

66.67

87.5

0 0 0

44.44

33.33

12.5

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


70

Program

Learning Goal

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


4. Global

Perspectives

4.1 Augment

business

decisions with

global

considerations.

Summative: Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment (BUS 690


Formative: Course-

Embedded Assessment

(BUS 685 final term

projects)



Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%;


80%

Course-Embedded


MB.4.1.1.1

See

Figures

MBA-17

through

MBA-20


should meet or, exceed

expectation.

Students failed to meet the

target in the summative

assessment.

Trend: Performance in

summative assessment is

very poor.

Career and Placement Center (CPC) in

collaboration with Unilever Bangladesh

arranged a session called "Learn to Lead" In

where the HR Director (Kunal Sharma)

spoke about the Unilever Future Leaders

Program. This event was very informative

for both faculty and students.


0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E


41.16

50.26

68.75

33.3329.57 27.53 25.51

20.17

3.72

0

20

40

60

80



EXCEED EXPECTATIONP

erce

nta

ges

of

Stu

den

ts


71


71.43

0

28.57

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


40

62.5

71.43

10

0 0

50

37.5

28.57

0

20

40

60

80



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


72

Program

Learning Goal

Student

Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement


5. Ethical

Considerations

5.1 Evaluate and

articulate

ethical

considerations

in managerial

decision

making and in

enterprise

management.

Summative: Exit


Course-Embedded

Assessment (BUS 690




Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%;


80%

Course-Embedded


MB.5.1.1.1

See

Figures

MBA-21

and

MBA-22



expectation.


target.

Trend: Student

performance is extremely

poor in this area. It is a

matter of great concern

NSU Ethics club organizes different seminars

to make students aware about ethical

standards.

Courses are also designed to include ethical

standards in managerial decision making and

in enterprise management


Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: Executive Master of Business Administration

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E


23.11

47.0450

45.64

38.96

50

31.25

14

00

20

40

60



EXCEED EXPECTATIONP

erce

nta

ges

of

Stu

den

ts


73

Program

Learning Goal

Student

Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement

Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 1. Managerial

Communications

1.1 Communicate

effectively

toward

achieving

managerial

objectives.

Summative: Exit

Assessment Test and

Course-Embedded

Assessment (EMB

690 final term project)

Formative: Course-

Embedded

Assessment (EMB

650 final term project)

Assessment Tests Meets


Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%;


80%

Course-Embedded


EM.1.1.1.1

See

Figures

EMBA –

1 through

EMBA -

4




formative assessment but

failed to meet it in summative

assessment.

Trend: Student performance

in summative assessment has

deteriorated over the period.

This is an area of concern.

NSU organizes different events and

encourages students to participate in

different business competitions so that

they learn how to communicate

effectively to achieve a business goal.

Figure EMBA - 1 Figure EMBA - 2

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

EMBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation

53.26

81.48

68.59

14.957.41

27.5631.79

11.113.85

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEED EXPECTATIONP

erce

nta

ges

of

Stu

den

ts

EMBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Summative; Trend

74


87.5

0

12.5

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents

EMBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Fall 2017; FormativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations

85.71 88.89 87.5

0 0 0

14.29 11.11 12.5

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents

EMBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Formative; Trend

75

Program

Learning Goal

Student

Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement

Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 2. Critical

Thinking and

Decision

Making

2.1 Apply

appropriate

analytic

framework to

solving

management

problems, and

developing of

integrative

managerial

solutions.

Summative: Exit

Assessment Test and

Course-Embedded

Assessment (EMB 690

final term project)

Formative: Course-

Embedded Assessment

(EMB 650 final term

project)



Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%;


80%

Course-Embedded


EM.2.1.1.1

See

Figures

EMBA –

5 through

EMBA -

8





assessment.



very poor with a high




different business competitions that provide

them the opportunities to present their

creative minds and apply foundation

knowledge gained in academic courses.


0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E


60.0556.48

61.67

14.95

41.6738.33

25

1.85 00

20

40

60

80



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


76


100

0 00

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


85.71 88.89100

0 0 0

14.29 11.110

0

20

40

60

80

100

120



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


77

Program

Learning Goal

Student

Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement

Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 2. Critical

Thinking and

Decision

Making

2.2 Determine

relevant

decision

criteria and

alternatives,

and identify

the optimal

solution.

Summative: Exit

Assessment Test and

Course-Embedded

Assessment (EMB 690

final term project)

Formative: Course-

Embedded Assessment

(EMB 650 final term

project)



Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%;


80%

Course-Embedded


EM.2.1.1.1

See

Figures

EMBA –

9 through

EMBA -

12





assessment.



very poor with an increase in




different business competitions that

provide them the opportunities to present

their creative minds and apply foundation

knowledge gained in academic courses.


0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E


31.79

65.74

56.67

6.25

30.56

43.33

61.96

3.70

0

20

40

60

80



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


78


100

0 00

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


85.71 88.89100

0 0 0

14.29 11.110

0

20

40

60

80

100

120



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


79

Program

Learning Goal

Student Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement

Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 3. Integration of

management

tools and

techniques

3.1 Integrate and apply the

tools and techniques of

management, drawing

on a broad-based

knowledge of the major

functions (accounting,

economics, finance,

information systems,

marketing, operations

management, and

strategy) to solve

complex management

problems and render

sound business

decisions.

Summative: Exit

Assessment Test

and Course-

Embedded

Assessment

(EMB 690 final

term project)

Formative:

Course-

Embedded

Assessment

(EMB 650 final

term project)

Assessment Tests

Meets

Expectation: 60%

-80%; Does Not

Meet Expectation

< 60%; Exceeds

Expectation> 80%

Course-Embedded

Assessment:

Rubric #

EM.3.1.1.1

See Figures

EMBA – 13

through

EMBA - 16





assessment.



poor with high percentage of

students not meeting

expectation. However,

performance has improved over

the period. This is still an area

of major concern.

Courses have been standardized in terms

of content, sequence of coverage,

grading, use of text book and other

learning resources.


0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E


72.83

16.67

60

14.67

83.33

40

12.5

0 00

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


80


87.5

0

12.5

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


85.71 88.89 87.5

0 0 0

14.29 11.11 12.5

0

20

40

60

80

100



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


81

Program

Learning Goal

Student

Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement

Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 4. Global

Perspective

4.1 Augment

business

decisions with

global

considerations.

Summative: Exit

Assessment Test and

Course-Embedded

Assessment (EMB 690

final term project)

Formative: Course-

Embedded Assessment

(EMB 670 final term

project)



Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%;


80%

Course-Embedded


EM.4.1.1.1

See

Figures

EMBA –

17

through

EMBA -

20



expectation.



assessment.

Trend: Student

performance in summative

assessment is very poor and

is an area of high concern.

Career and Placement Center (CPC) in

collaboration with Unilever Bangladesh

arranged a session called "Learn to Lead" In

where the HR Director (Kunal Sharma)

spoke about the Unilever Future Leaders

Program. This event was very informative

for both faculty and students.


0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E


72.83

28.7

65

8.42

46.3

2518.75

25

10

0

20

40

60

80



EXCEED EXPECTATIONP

erce

nta

ges

of

Stu

den

ts


82


33.33

16.67

50

0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


50 50

33.33

50

16.67 16.67

0

33.33

50

0

20

40

60



EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


83

Program

Learning Goal

Student

Learning

Outcome Measure

Measurement

Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 5. Ethical

considerations

5.1 Evaluate and

articulate ethical

considerations in

managerial

decision making

and in enterprise

management.

Summative: Exit

Assessment Test and

Course-Embedded

Assessment (EMB 690

final term project)



Does Not Meet

Expectation < 60%;


80%

Course-Embedded


EM.5.1.1.1

See

Figures

EMBA -

21 and

EMBA -

22


meet or, exceed expectation


target

Trend: Student‟s performance

is poor in this area with a high



NSU Ethics club organizes different

seminars to make students aware about

ethical standards.


0

20

40

60

80

100

M D E


68.7562.04 60

6.25

37.96

25 25

0

15

0

20

40

60

80

2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SP 2017 SP


EXCEED EXPECTATION

Per

cen

tage

s o

f St

ud

ents


84

Documents

BBA, MBA, and EMBA Program Student Learning Assessment ... 2017 SLAR.pdf · Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA Program (Common Program Learning Goals and Student Learning