Berichtigungen: Bemerkungen zum achten Buch der OdysseeSource: Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, Neue Folge, 19. Jahrg. (1864), p. 480Published by: J.D. Sauerländers VerlagStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41249706 .

Accessed: 22/05/2014 19:29

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

.

J.D. Sauerländers Verlag is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to RheinischesMuseum für Philologie.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 195.78.108.15 on Thu, 22 May 2014 19:30:00 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

480 3fti3ceften.

nee tamen ideo principalis argumenti ratio perturbatur quia geminari aliquantum argumenta natura permittit.'

Sic scripsit Koppius codd. DMeR secutus: enumerandis eis quae ante eum scribebantur facile supersedeo utpote quae e peioribus libris peterentur. quanquam aliud recte in eis legi- tur ex coniectura ut videtur. patet enim ex eis quae in fine sen- tentiae leguntur de cumulatis argumentis dici ut necessario aliud - quod scribendum sit. sed in extremis verbis vehe- menter offendo in aliquantum; etenim res aut geminantur aut non : plus vel minus qui aliquas res geminari dixerit ne- minem invenio. neque dici omnino potest. geminare autem hoc loco idem valere atque duplicare ex toto conexu adparet; attamen si geminare simpliciter hie coniungere significare contenderis ut apud Statium in silvarum I, 2, 237 sq. :

'Iamdudum poste reclinis Quaerit Hymen thalamis intactum dicere carmen quo vatem mulcere queat: dat Iuno verenda vincula et insigni geminat Concordia taeda'

(ubi pro intactum scribendum censeo intactis quoniam neque per se carmen apte intactum adpellari poterat neque tha- lamis intactum iungi licet ideo quod hymenaeus profecto thalamis non intactus est ; intactis thalamis contra dice- batur aptissime sponsae laudandae gratia) neque sententia pror- sus recte sese habebit neque quicquam proficies. manifestum puto aliquantum ex aliquando corruptum esse.

(Continuabuntur.) Franciscus Eyssenhardt.

Nachtrag zu S. 459 ff. Det anonyme Druckbogen, aus bem bie zwei neuen Glabiatoten-

Tesseren mitgetheilt wurben, ist aus ben mir seitbem zugekommenen ^Dissertation! archeologiche di vario argomento , di Ratkaele Garrucci', Koma 1864. Die bis jetzt allein erschienene dispensa I. schlieht abet getabe mit jenem (7ten) Vogen.

8. Iuni. F. R.

Vetichtigungen. In Heft 2 (,,Bemetkungen zum 8. Buck bet Obyssee" von

H. Anton) S. 236 g. 17 lies: ,,fut spatetn Zusah V. 22. 23, fut entbehtlich V. 81. 82". - Ebenba Z. 19 lies: ,,Die Schol. 564-^ 571". - S. 242 Z. 11 lies: ,,Frieben V. 599".

Bonn, Druck von Carl Georgi. (Iuni 1864.)

This content downloaded from 195.78.108.15 on Thu, 22 May 2014 19:30:00 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions