7
7/27/2019 Britain's Man in Maynooth http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/britains-man-in-maynooth 1/7 Britain s Man in Maynooth Secret files discovered by Irish author, Ciarán MacAirt, reveal the relationship between an Irish Monsignor and a covert British propagandist Ciarán MacAirt is author of the book, The McGurk’s Bar Bombing web: www.mcgurksbar.com | email: [email protected] | 25 th June 2013

Britain's Man in Maynooth

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Britain's Man in Maynooth

7/27/2019 Britain's Man in Maynooth

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/britains-man-in-maynooth 1/7

Britain ’ s Man in Maynooth Secret files discovered by Irish author, Ciarán MacAirt, reveal the

relationship between an Irish Monsignor and a covert British

propagandist

Ciarán MacAirt is author of the book, The McGurk’s Bar Bombing

web: www.mcgurksbar.com | email: [email protected] | 25 th June 2013

Page 2: Britain's Man in Maynooth

7/27/2019 Britain's Man in Maynooth

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/britains-man-in-maynooth 2/7

2 | P a g e

2 Britain ’s Man in Maynooth

Britain ’ s Man in Maynooth

Whilst studying previously secret files in Kew National Archives, London, as part of my on-

going research into my grandmother’s murder in the McGurk’s Bar Bombing of 4thDecember

1971, I came across a very interesting archive. At first glance it is a brief, quite non-descript

information report from one British civil servant in the Dublin embassy to another British

civil servant in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO).

Looks can be deceiving though.

The Information Policy Report from the Republic of Ireland dated 23rd September

1971 (FCO 2/703) was prepared by Information Officer, PJC Evans, for DN Brinson, working

in the Guidance and Information Policy Department of the Foreign and Commonwealth

Office (FCO). Evans’s report briefly outlines the objectives and methods of the small and

seemingly stretched Information Section a few weeks after internment. Nevertheless, it was

sent with a “Secret Annex on the IRD activity” which jumped out at me as it highlighted that

the post was run by the Information Research Department (IRD). The heartbeat flutters

when you track and find secret annexes like this.

Covert British Propagandists

The IRD was a deeply covert propaganda unit that was set up within the FCO primarily to

combat the communist threat during the Cold War. It was also brought into Northern Ireland

by British Prime Minister, Edward Heath, in the early 70s to be used against the IRA. It

features in my book , The McGurk’s Bar Bombing: Collusion, Cover -Up and a Campaign for

Truth, due to the covert management of information and dissemination of black propaganda

in the aftermath of the atrocity and death of my grandmother.

Here the IRD helped manage British information policy and reorganise the

information activity of agencies including Headquarters Northern Ireland, the office of the

UK Representative and the RUC Information Office. Whilst researching my book, I accessed a

file which proved that the IRD appointed Clifford Hill and Hugh Mooney to the office of

Page 3: Britain's Man in Maynooth

7/27/2019 Britain's Man in Maynooth

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/britains-man-in-maynooth 3/7

3 | P a g e

3 Britain ’s Man in Maynooth

Howard Smith, the UK Representative at Stormont who was Whitehall’s man on the ground

in Northern Ireland. Hugh Mooney l iaised closely with the British Army’s top -secret

Information Policy Unit which was run by expert propagandist Colonel Maurice Tugwell and

reported directly to the General Officer Commanding (GOC). Mooney’s post of Information

Adviser to the GOC was a “cov er appointment for the representative of the Information

Research Department” (Annex b to A/BR/180/MO4, section1). In Stormont circles, Hill was

simply known as “Cliff the Spy”.

Evans notes that his Dublin section was distributing “a variety of IRD written

material on aspects of world Communism” to contacts including the Irish Department of

Foreign Affairs (DFA). The DFA, Evans says, though, was “small and overworked” and

“scarcely able to digest IRD material” never mind put it to any propaganda use. These were

evidently overt channels of dissemination but Evans also relays that information was being

“passed in confidence to one or two trusted local journalists” who wrote about Communist

affairs. He also records that the:

“second category of IRD activity at this post concerns the ‘indoctrination’ – if that is

not too strong a word – of journalist contacts writing on Anglo/Irish affairs”

It is newsworthy and quite current to find record of a state –and a foreign state at that –

seeking to exert control over information that is placed in the Irish public domain via so-

called trusted media. Indeed, Evans writes that the stated “aim is to ind uce, as we frequently

can, reliable journalist contacts to publish articles in their own names which contains

substantial amounts of information provided by the Information Officer”.

Nevertheless, such journalistic contacts are the stock and trade of the Information

Officer’s job so I anticipated such IRD activities as these, no matter how shocking it may be

to contemplate that indigenous media would be so open to foreign propaganda.

Page 4: Britain's Man in Maynooth

7/27/2019 Britain's Man in Maynooth

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/britains-man-in-maynooth 4/7

4 | P a g e

4 Britain ’s Man in Maynooth

Furthermore, these are unnamed channels for the dissemination of material manufactured

by the British IRD.

There is a named source within this secret annex, though, and he was a man in a position of

great spiritual and civic influence.

Evans recorded that the very well-known, high-ranking Irish Catholic cleric was

a contact for the department and in receipt of “certain IRD material”. His name was

Monsignor Jeremiah Newman and he was the President of Maynooth College, “the training

centre for the Catholic Priesthood in Ireland” as Evans tells Brinson. Newman later became

Bishop of Limerick.

“Eastern European topics” seems to be the primary concern of this “selected

material” and it is unsurprising that the Catholic hierarchy would have an ear for anti -

communist propaganda due to the historical antagonism between the ideologies (1) .

Indeed Evans hints that it is an easy sell as he writes “With the priests in charge of

religious seminaries who send priests on missionary work abroad, we are preaching to the

convert”.

Internment and the War in the North

Nevertheless, a war was raging in the north east of the island at that time and the British

administration had recently ranged the highly discriminatory Special Power, internment

without trial, against its Roman Catholic population and its Roman Catholic population

alone. Indeed, when internment was introduced a few weeks beforehand on 9th August, the

British Army killed 11 Catholic civilians in Ballymurphy, West Belfast, over three days,

including the local parish priest. So for a high-ranking, influential Irish cleric to be in such

close contact with a clandestine unit of the British administration and in receipt of its

propaganda, is highly controversial. Nevertheless, stark questions regarding the relationship

between the IRD and Newman remain to be answered:

Page 5: Britain's Man in Maynooth

7/27/2019 Britain's Man in Maynooth

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/britains-man-in-maynooth 5/7

5 | P a g e

5 Britain ’s Man in Maynooth

Was this relationship sanctioned by the Catholic hierarchy?

Did the Irish Government know about the relationship?

What propaganda was promulgated – was it simply anti-Communist or did it expand to

include material on Northern Ireland?How long did the relationship last and were other

clerics targeted?

What did Newman and/or the Catholic Church get from the relationship?

Were the young Irish priests aware that the information being fed to them was provided

by the highly secret and classified agency of a foreign power (never mind the British

State)?

Newman’s Toxic Legacy

Jeremiah Newman (2) was a scholar of note who studied in Louvain and Oxford Universities

after Maynooth. He taught scholastic philosophy at Queen’s University Belfast (1951 -2)

before returning to teach at Maynooth, becoming President of the College in 1968. His

output as an author was prodigious with over 20 books on subjects ranging from regional

planning to post-modernism and the Church and State. Then in 1974 he was appointed as

Bishop of Limerick which dragged him from his closeted academic existence.

By this time Ireland was growing more prosperous and Irish society was changing

fast, becoming increasingly secular and liberal. Despite his intellectualism and, ironically,

considering his name, Newman’s pastoral leadership was suited for the generation be fore

Vatican II’s reforms of 1962. He stringently believed in the unassailable right of the Catholic

Church to influence the civil law of Ireland and he often intervened personally. He railed

against secularism and ecumenism and his dogmatic pronouncements at times caused

unease even amongst the Catholic hierarchy (3). The Irish Times recorded for posterity two

of his most “characteristically controversial interventions” in his obituary printed on 4th

April 1995. In May 1976, at a time when sectarian killings perpetrated by both sides in the

north east were once more peaking, Newman:

Page 6: Britain's Man in Maynooth

7/27/2019 Britain's Man in Maynooth

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/britains-man-in-maynooth 6/7

6 | P a g e

6 Britain ’s Man in Maynooth

‘Warned against the dangers to Irish society of “secularism, the strident propaganda

of minorities and the effort to conciliate the North”, and urged action to prevent the

incor poration of an “inordinate special position” for non -Catholic minorities in the

State’s laws.’

Then the following January, during a Christian Unity Week service of all things, he

reminded the cross-community flock that Catholics would still be the majority in a united

Ireland. The Protestant Dean of Limerick, rightly outraged, said that with such a statement

the bishop “might as well go North and load the guns of the UVF”. His views on sexual

morals, contraception, divorce and even disarmament were similarly dogmatic and

authoritarian.

Child Abuse Scandal

Nevertheless, Newman’s bitterest legacy will be felt by some of those who were vulnerable

children in his diocese. In September 2012, the National Board for Safeguarding Children in

the Catholic Church in Ireland, fingered Newman for inadequate handling of accusations of

child abuse by his clerics. In one instance, he knowingly allowed an abusive priest return

from England and minister in the Limerick diocese where that priest is believed to have

continued h is rape of children. Newman’s strict sexual moral code did not it seems stretch to

include the protection of children from his own priests.

It is not as if Newman’s toxic legacy did not need the further slur that he was a close

contact for a covert British propaganda unit and a willing conduit for its material.

Download the secret files

Read the Irish News article by Andrea McKernon

Page 7: Britain's Man in Maynooth

7/27/2019 Britain's Man in Maynooth

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/britains-man-in-maynooth 7/7

7 | P a g e

7 Britain ’s Man in Maynooth

References

(1) An example would be the Decree Against Communism by Pope Pius XII in 1949 which

excommunicated all Catholics who collaborated with Communist organisations and

effectively excommunicated millions of Catholics. The Sanctum Officium, the office which

oversees Roman Catholic doctrine, issued further condemnations of communism throughout

the 50s and 60s.

(2) Much of Newman’s history in the following 3 paragraphs is taken from variou s obituaries

especially the Irish Times, April 4 1995

(3) Irish Times, April 4 1995

Campaign for Truth | Visit

Web: www.mcgurksbar.com

Email: [email protected]

Book: The McGurk’s Bar Bombing

Author: Ciarán MacAirt

Kitty agus Johnny Irvine

Le grá go deo