89
Sampling Design & Measurement Techniques

Brm Unit 3 - Final

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Brm Unit 3 - Final

Sampling Design & Measurement

Techniques

Page 2: Brm Unit 3 - Final

2

The Sampling Design Process; Types of Sample Design – Probability and Non-probability Sampling Designs; Size of Sample; Sampling Errors; Concept of Measurement and Scaling; Important Scaling Techniques – Comparative and Non-comparative; Reliability and Validity of Measurement

Page 3: Brm Unit 3 - Final

3

Sampling Terminology

Sample -A subset, or some part, of a larger population.

Population (universe) -Any complete group of entitiesthat share some common set of characteristics.

Population element -An individual member of a population.

Census - An investigation of all the individual elements that make up a population.

Page 4: Brm Unit 3 - Final

4

Why Sample?Applied business research projects usually have budget and time constraints. If Ford Motor Corporation wished to take a census of past purchasers’ reactions to the company’s recalls of defective models, the researchers would have to contact millions of automobile buyers. Some of them would be inaccessible (for example, out of the country), and it would be impossible to contact all these people within a short time period.

In most situations, however, many practical reasons favor sampling. Sampling cuts costs, reduces labor requirements, and gathers vital information quickly.

Page 5: Brm Unit 3 - Final

5

Sampling ConceptsDefining the Target Population

At the outset of the sampling process, the target population must be carefully defined so that the proper sources from which the data are to be collected can be identified. For consumer-related research, the appropriate population element frequently is the household rather than an individual member of the household.

Page 6: Brm Unit 3 - Final

6

Sampling ConceptsThe Sampling Frame

In practice, the sample will be drawn from a list of population elements that often differs somewhat from the defined target population. A list of elements from which the sample may be drawn is called a sampling frame.

In practice, almost every list excludes some members of the population. For example, would a university e-mail directory provide an accurate sampling frame for a given university’s student population? Perhaps the sampling frame excludes students who registered late and includes students who have resigned from the university.

Page 7: Brm Unit 3 - Final

7

Page 8: Brm Unit 3 - Final

8

Sampling Concepts

A Reverse Directory provides, in a different format, the same information contained in a telephone directory. Listings may be by city and street address or by phone number, rather than alphabetical by last name. Such a directory is particularly useful when a research wishes to survey only a certain geographical area of a city or when census tracts are to be selected on the basis of income or another demographic criterion.

Reverse Directory

Page 9: Brm Unit 3 - Final

9

Sampling Concepts

A sampling frame error occurs when certain sample elements are excluded or when the entire population is not accurately represented in the sampling frame. Election polling that used a telephone directory as a sampling frame would be contacting households with listed phone numbers, not households whose members are likely to vote. A better sampling frame might be voter registration records.

Sampling Frame Error

Page 10: Brm Unit 3 - Final

10

Sampling Concepts

During the actual sampling process, the elements of the population must be selected according to a certain procedure. The sampling unit is a single element or group of elements subject to selection in the sample. For example, if an airline wishes to sample passengers, it may take every 25th name on a complete list of passengers. In this case the sampling unit would be the same as the element.

Sampling Units

Page 11: Brm Unit 3 - Final

11

Sampling Concepts

If the target population has first been divided into units, such as airline flights, additional terminology must be used. A unit selected in the first stage of sampling is called a primary sampling unit (PSU). A unit selected in a successive stages of sampling is called a secondary sampling unit or (if three stages are necessary) tertiary sampling unit.

Sampling Units

Page 12: Brm Unit 3 - Final

12

Random Sampling and Non-sampling Errors

if a difference exists between the value of a sample statistic of interest (for example, the sample group’s average willingness to buy the advertised brand) and the value of the corresponding population parameter (the population’s average willingness to buy), a statistical error has occurred.

Page 13: Brm Unit 3 - Final

13

Random Sampling and Non-sampling Errors

Random Sampling Error is the difference between the sample result and the result of a census conducted using identical procedures. Random sampling error occurs because of chance variation in the scientific selection of sampling units. The sampling units, even if properly selected according to sampling theory, may not perfectly represent the population, but generally they are reliable estimates.

Page 14: Brm Unit 3 - Final

14

Random Sampling and Non-sampling Errors

Random sampling error is a function of sample size. As sample size increases, random sampling error decreases.

Suppose a survey of approximately 1,000 people has been taken in Fresno to determine the feasibility of a new soccer franchise. Assume that 30 percent of the respondents favor the idea of a new professional sport in town. The researcher will know, based on the laws of probability, that 95 percent of the time a survey of slightly fewer than 900 people will produce results with an error of approximately plus or minus 3 percent.

Page 15: Brm Unit 3 - Final

15

Random Sampling and Non-sampling Errors

Systematic Sampling Error

Systematic (nonsampling) errors result from nonsampling factors, primarily the nature of a study’s design and the correctness of execution. These errors are not due to chance fluctuations. For example, highly educated respondents are more likely to cooperate with mail surveys than poorly educated ones, for whom filling out forms is more difficult and intimidating. Sample biases such as these account for a large portion of errors in marketing research.

Page 16: Brm Unit 3 - Final

16

Probability & Non-probability Sampling

The main alternative sampling plans may be grouped into two categories: probability techniques and non-probability techniques.

Probability Sampling A sampling technique in which every member of the population has a known, nonzero probability of selection.Non-probability sampling A sampling technique in which units of the sample are selected on the basis of personal judgment or convenience; the probability of any particular member of the population being chosen is unknown.

Page 17: Brm Unit 3 - Final

17

Nonprobability SamplingResearchers sometimes find nonprobability samples best suited for a specific researcher purpose. As a result, nonprobability samples are pragmatic and are used in market research.

Convenience SamplingJudgment SamplingQuota SamplingSnowball Sampling

Page 18: Brm Unit 3 - Final

18

Nonprobability Sampling

Convenience sampling refers to sampling by obtaining people or units that are conveniently available. A research team may determine that the most convenient and economical method is to set up an interviewing booth from which to intercept consumers at a shopping center. Researchers generally use convenience samples to obtain a large number of completed questionnaires quickly and economically, or when obtaining a sample through other means is impractical.

Convenience Sampling

Page 19: Brm Unit 3 - Final

19

Nonprobability Sampling

For example, many Internet surveys are conducted with volunteer respondents who, either intentionally or by happenstance, visit an organization’s Web site. The user of research based on a convenience sample should remember that projecting the results beyond the specific sample is inappropriate. Convenience samples are best used for exploratory research when additional research will subsequently be conducted with a probability sample.

Convenience Sampling

Page 20: Brm Unit 3 - Final

20

Nonprobability Sampling

Judgment (purposive) sampling is a nonprobability sampling technique in which an experienced individual selects the sample based on his or her judgment about some appropriate characteristics required of the sample member. Researchers select samples that satisfy their specific purposes, even if they are not fully representative. Test-market cities often are selected because they are viewed as typical cities whose demographic profiles closely match the national profile.

Judgment Sampling

Page 21: Brm Unit 3 - Final

21

Nonprobability Sampling

Judgment sampling often is used in attempts to forecast election results. People frequently wonder how a television network can predict the results of an election with only 2 percent of the votes reported. Of course, the assumption is that the past voting records of these districts are still representative of the political behavior of the state’s population.

Judgment Sampling

Page 22: Brm Unit 3 - Final

22

Nonprobability Sampling

the purpose of quota sampling is to ensure that the various subgroups in a population are represented on pertinent sample characteristics to the exact extent that the investigators desire. Stratified sampling, a probability sampling procedure described in the next section, also has this objective, but it should not be confused with quota sampling.

Quota Sampling

Page 23: Brm Unit 3 - Final

23

Nonprobability Sampling

In quota sampling, the interviewer has a quota to achieve. For example, an interviewer in a particular city may be assigned 100 interviews, 35 with owners of Sony TVs, 30 with owners of Samsung TVs, 18 with owners of Panasonic TVs, and the rest with owners of other brands. The interviewer is responsible for finding enough people to meet the quota.

Quota Sampling

Page 24: Brm Unit 3 - Final

24

Nonprobability Sampling

A sampling procedure in which initial respondents are selected by probability methods and additional respondents are obtained from information provided by the initial respondents. Suppose a manufacturer of sports equipment is considering marketing a mahogany croquet set for serious adult players. This market is certainly small. An extremely large sample would be necessary to find 100 serious adult croquet players. It would be much more economical to survey, say, 300 people, find 15 croquet players, and ask them for the names of other players.

Snowball Sampling

Page 25: Brm Unit 3 - Final

25

Probability Sampling

All probability sampling techniques are based on chance selection procedures. Because the probability sampling process is random, the bias inherent in nonprobability sampling procedures is eliminated. the term random refers to the procedure for selecting the sample; it does not describe the data in the sample. Randomness characterizes a procedure whose outcome cannot be predicted because it depends on chance.

Page 26: Brm Unit 3 - Final

26

Probability Sampling

The sampling procedure that ensures each element in the population will have an equal chance of being included in the sample is called simple random sampling. Examples include drawing names from a hat and selecting the winning raffle ticket from a large drum. If the names or raffle tickets are thoroughly stirred, each person or ticket should have an equal chance of being selected.

Simple Random Sampling

Page 27: Brm Unit 3 - Final

27

Probability Sampling

Suppose a researcher wants to take a sample of 1,000 from a list of 200,000 names. With systematic sampling, every 200th name from the list would be drawn. The procedure is extremely simple. A starting point is selected by a random process; then every nth number on the list is selected. While systematic sampling is not actually a random selection procedure, it does yield random results if the arrangement of the items in the list is random in character. The problem of periodicity occurs if a list has a systematic pattern—that is, if it is not random in character.

Systematic Sampling

Page 28: Brm Unit 3 - Final

28

Probability Sampling

To take a sample of consumers from a rural telephone directory that does not separate business from residential listings, every 23rd name might be selected as the sampling interval. In the process, Mike’s Restaurant might be selected. This unit is inappropriate because it is a business listing rather than a consumer listing, so the next eligible name would be selected as the sampling unit, and the systematic process would continue.

Systematic Sampling

Page 29: Brm Unit 3 - Final

29

Probability Sampling

A probability sampling procedure in which simple random subsamples that are more or less equal on some characteristic are drawn from within each stratum of the population. The reason for taking a stratified sample is to obtain a more efficient sample than would be possible with simple random sampling. Another reason for selecting a stratified sample is to ensure that the sample will accurately reflect the population on the basis of the criterion or criteria used for stratification.

Stratified Sampling

Page 30: Brm Unit 3 - Final

30

Probability Sampling

Suppose, for example, that urban and rural groups havewidely different attitudes toward energy conservation, but members within each group hold very similar attitudes. Random sampling error will be reduced with the use of stratified sampling, because each group is internally homogeneous but there are comparative differences between groups.

Stratified Sampling

Page 31: Brm Unit 3 - Final

31

Probability Sampling

Proportional Stratified Sample A stratified sample in which the number of sampling units drawn from each stratum is in proportion to the population size of that stratum.

Stratified Sampling

Disproportional Stratified Sample A stratified sample in which the sample size for each stratum is allocated according to analytical considerations.

Page 32: Brm Unit 3 - Final

32

Probability Sampling

An economically efficient sampling technique in which the primary sampling unit is not the individual element in the population but a large cluster of elements; clusters are selected randomly. In a cluster sample, the primary sampling unit is no longer the individual element in the population (for example, grocery stores) but a larger cluster of elements located in proximity to one another (for example, cities).

Cluster Sampling

Page 33: Brm Unit 3 - Final

33

Probability Sampling

Cluster samples frequently are used when lists of the sample population are not available. For example, when researchers investigating employees and self-employed workers for a downtown revitalization project found that a comprehensive list of these people was not available, they decided to take a cluster sample, selecting organizations (business and government) as the clusters.

Cluster Sampling

Page 34: Brm Unit 3 - Final

34

Probability Sampling

Sampling that involves using a combination of two or more probability sampling techniques. Typically, geographic areas are randomly selected in progressively smaller (lower-population) units. For example, a political pollster investigating an election in Arizona might first choose counties within the state to ensure that the different areas are represented in the sample.

Multistage Area Sampling

Page 35: Brm Unit 3 - Final

35

Probability Sampling

In the second step, precincts within the selected counties may be chosen. As a final step, the pollster may select blocks (or households) within the precincts, then interview all the blocks (or households) within the geographic area.

Multistage Area Sampling

Page 36: Brm Unit 3 - Final

36

Sample Size

Page 37: Brm Unit 3 - Final

37

Sample Size

Intuitively we know that the larger the sample, the more accurate the research. This is in fact a statistical truth; random sampling error varies with samples of different sizes. In statistical terms, increasing the sample size decreases the width of the confidence interval at a given confidence level.

Random Error and Sample Size

Page 38: Brm Unit 3 - Final

38

Sample Size

Increasing the sample size reduces the sampling error. However, those familiar with the law of diminishing returns in economics will easily grasp the concept that increases in sample size reduce sampling error at a decreasing rate. For example, doubling a sample of 1,000 will reduce random sampling error by 1 percentage point, but doubling the sample from 2,000 to 4,000 will reduce random sampling error by only another half percentage point.

Random Error and Sample Size

Page 39: Brm Unit 3 - Final

39

Sample Size

Three factors are required to specify sample size: (1) the heterogeneity (i.e., variance) of the population; (2) the magnitude of acceptable error (i.e., ± some amount); and (3) the confidence level (i.e., 90 percent, 95 percent, 99 percent). The determination of sample size heavily depends on the variability within the sample. The variance, or heterogeneity, of the population is the first necessary bit of information.

Random Error and Sample SizeFactors in Determining Sample Size

Page 40: Brm Unit 3 - Final

40

Sample Size

For example, predicting the average age of college students requires a smaller sample than predicting the average age of people who visit the zoo on a given Sunday afternoon. As heterogeneity increases, so must sample size. Thus, to test the effectiveness of an employee training program, the sample must be large enough to cover the range of employee work experience.

Random Error and Sample SizeFactors in Determining Sample Size

Page 41: Brm Unit 3 - Final

41

Sample Size

Just as sample units may be selected to suit the convenience or judgment of the researcher, sample size may also be determined on the basis of managerial judgments. Using a sample size similar to those used in previous studies provides the inexperienced researcher with a comparison with other researchers’ judgments.

Determining Sample Size on the Basis of Judgment

Page 42: Brm Unit 3 - Final

42

Sample Size

Another judgmental factor that affects the determination of sample size is the selection of the appropriate item, question, or characteristic to be used for the sample size calculations. Several different characteristics affect most studies, and the desired degree of precision may vary for these items.

Determining Sample Size on the Basis of Judgment

Page 43: Brm Unit 3 - Final

43

Sample Size

Another consideration stems from most researchers’ need to analyze various subgroups within the sample. For example, suppose a researcher wants to look at employee attitudes, but is particularly interested in differences across genders and age groups.

Determining Sample Size on the Basis of Judgment

There is a judgmental rule of thumb for selecting minimum subgroup sample size: Each subgroup to be separately analyzed should have a minimum of 100 units in each category of the major breakdowns.

Page 44: Brm Unit 3 - Final

44

Sample Size

Stratified sampling involves drawing separate probability samples within the subgroups to make the sample more efficient. With a stratified sample, the sample variances are expected to differ by strata. This makes the determination of sample size more complex. Increased complexity may also characterize the determination of sample size for cluster sampling and other probability sampling methods.

Determining Sample Size for Stratifiedand Other Probability Samples

Page 45: Brm Unit 3 - Final

Concept of Measurement and Scaling

45

Page 46: Brm Unit 3 - Final

46

Concept of Measurement and Scaling

Measurement is the process of describing some property of a phenomenon of interest, usually by assigning numbers in a reliable and valid way. The numbers convey information about the property being measured. When numbers are used, the researcher must have a rule for assigning a number to an observation in a way that provides an accurate description.

Page 47: Brm Unit 3 - Final

47

Concept of Measurement and Scaling

1. A student can be assigned a letter corresponding to his/her performance.a. A — Represents excellent performanceb. B — Represents good performancec. C — Represents average performanced. D — Represents poor performancee. F — Represents failing performance

Page 48: Brm Unit 3 - Final

48

Concept of Measurement and Scaling

2. A student can be assigned a number corresponding to a percentage performance scale.a. 100 percent — Represents a perfect score. All assignments are performed correctly.b. 60–99 percent — Represents differing degrees of passing performance, each number representingthe proportion of correct work.c. 0–59 percent — Represents failing performance but still captures proportion of correctwork.

Page 49: Brm Unit 3 - Final

49

Concept of Measurement and Scaling

The problem definition process should suggest the concepts that must be measured. A concept can be thought of as a generalized idea that represents something of meaning. Concepts such as age, gender, education, and number of children are relatively concrete properties. Concepts such as loyalty, personality, channel power, trust, corporate culture, customer satisfaction, value, and so on are more difficult to both define and measure.

Concepts

Page 50: Brm Unit 3 - Final

50

Concept of Measurement and Scaling

For example, loyalty has been measured as a combination of customer share (the relative proportion of a person’s purchases going to one competing brand/store) and commitment (the degree to which a customer will sacrifice to do business with a brand/store).

Concepts

Page 51: Brm Unit 3 - Final

51

Concept of Measurement and Scaling

Researchers measure concepts through a process known as operationalization. This process involves identifying scales that correspond to variance in the concept. Scales, just as a scale you may use to check your weight, provide a range of values that correspond to different values in the concept being measured. In other words, scales provide correspondence rules that indicate that a certain value on a scale corresponds to some true value of a concept.

Operational Definitions

Page 52: Brm Unit 3 - Final

52

Levels of Scale Measurement

Traditionally, the level of scale measurement is seen as important because it determines the mathematical comparisons that are allowable. The four levels or types of scale measurement are nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio level scales.

Page 53: Brm Unit 3 - Final

53

Nominal scales represent the most elementary level of measurement. A nominal scale assigns a value to an object for identification or classification purposes only. a nominal scale is truly a qualitative scale. Nominal scales are extremely useful, and are sometimes the only appropriate measure, even though they can be considered elementary. Nominal scaling is arbitrary. What we mean is that each label can be assigned to any of the categories without introducing error.

Nominal Scale

Levels of Scale Measurement

Page 54: Brm Unit 3 - Final

54

The researcher could just as easily use numbers instead of letters. The important thing to note is the numbers are not representing different quantities or the value of the object.

Nominal Scale

Levels of Scale Measurement

Page 55: Brm Unit 3 - Final

55

Ordinal scales allow things to be arranged in order based on how much of some concept they possess. In other words, an ordinal scale is a ranking scale. Research participants often are asked to rank things based on preference. So, preference is the concept, and the ordinal scale lists the options from most to least preferred, or vice versa.

Ordinal Scale

Levels of Scale Measurement

Page 56: Brm Unit 3 - Final

56

Typical ordinal scales in business research ask respondents to rank their three favorite brands, have personnel managers rank potential employees after job interviews, or judge investments as “buy,” “hold,” or “sell.” Researchers know how each item, person, or stock is judged relative to others, but they do not know by howmuch.

Ordinal Scale

Levels of Scale Measurement

Page 57: Brm Unit 3 - Final

57

Interval scales have both nominal and ordinal properties, but they also capture information about differences in quantities of a concept. So, not only would a sales manager know that a particular salesperson outperformed a colleague, information that would be available with an ordinal measure, but the manager would know by how much.

Interval Scale

Levels of Scale Measurement

Page 58: Brm Unit 3 - Final

58

The classic example of an interval scale is temperature. Consider the following weather:• June 6 was 80° F• December 7 was 40° FThe interval Fahrenheit scale lets us know that December 7 was 40° F colder than June 6. But, we cannot conclude that December 7 was twice as cold as June 6. Although the actual numeral 80 is indeed twice as great as 40, remember that this is a scaling system.

Interval Scale

Levels of Scale Measurement

Page 59: Brm Unit 3 - Final

59

Ratio scales represent the highest form of measurement in that they have all the properties of interval scales with the additional attribute of representing absolute quantities. Interval scales possess only relative meaning, whereas ratio scales represent absolute meaning.

Ratio Scale

Levels of Scale Measurement

Page 60: Brm Unit 3 - Final

60

Consider the following items offered for sale in an online auction:• “Antique” 1970s digital watch—didn’t sell and no takers for free• Gold-filled Elgin wristwatch circa 1950—sold for $100• Vintage stainless steel Omega wristwatch—sold for $1,000• Antique rose gold Patek Philippe “Top Hat” wristwatch—sold for $9,000Ordinal conclusions- the Patek was worth more than the Omega, and the Omega was worth more than the Elgin. All three of these were worth more than the 1970s digital watch.

Levels of Scale Measurement

Page 61: Brm Unit 3 - Final

61

Interval conclusions- the Omega was worth $900 more than the Elgin. We can also conclude that the Patek was worth nine times as much as the Omega and that the 1970s watch was worthless (selling price $0.00). The latter two conclusions are possible because price represents a ratio scale.

Levels of Scale Measurement

Page 62: Brm Unit 3 - Final

62

Page 63: Brm Unit 3 - Final

63

In its most basic form, attitude scaling requires that an individual agree or disagree with a statement or respond to a single question. For example, respondents in a political poll may be asked whether they agree or disagree with the statement “The president should run for re-election.”

Scaling Techniques Simple Attitude Scales

Page 64: Brm Unit 3 - Final

64

A scale that consists of several response categories, oftenproviding respondents with alternatives to indicate positions on a continuum.

Scaling Techniques Category Scales

Page 65: Brm Unit 3 - Final

65

A measure of attitudes designed to allow respondents to rate how strongly they agree or disagree with carefully constructed statements, ranging from very positive to very negative attitudes toward some object.

Scaling Techniques The Likert Scale

Page 66: Brm Unit 3 - Final

66

A method of making sure all the items forming a composite scale are scored in the same direction. Negative items can be recoded into the equivalent responses for a non-reverse coded item.

Scaling Techniques Reverse Recoding

Xnew value = 6 - Xold value

Page 67: Brm Unit 3 - Final

67

A measure of attitudes that consists of a series of seven point rating scales that use bipolar adjectives to anchor the beginning and end of each scale.

Scaling Techniques Semantic Differential

Page 68: Brm Unit 3 - Final

68

An attitude rating scale similar to a semantic differential except that it uses numbers, instead of verbal descriptions, as response options to identify response positions.

Scaling Techniques Numerical Scales

Page 69: Brm Unit 3 - Final

69

A measure of attitudes in which respondents are asked to divide a constant sum to indicate the relative importance of attributes; respondents often sort cards, but the task may also be a rating task.

Scaling Techniques Constant-Sum Scale

Page 70: Brm Unit 3 - Final

70

A measure of attitude that allows respondents to rate an object by choosing any point along a graphic continuum.

Scaling Techniques Graphic Rating Scales

Page 71: Brm Unit 3 - Final

71

If the average school bus number is 77.7 with a standard deviation of 20.5. Will this help them use the buses more efficiently or better assign bus routes? Or, can a professor judge the quality of classes by the average ID number? While it could be calculated, the result is meaningless. Thus, although you can put numbers into formulas and perform calculations with almost any numbers, the researcher has to know the meaning behind the numbers before meaningful conclusions can be drawn.

Mathematical and Statistical Analysis of Scales

Page 72: Brm Unit 3 - Final

72

Discrete measures are those that take on only one of a finite number of values. A discrete scale is most often used to represent a classification variable. Therefore, discrete scales do not represent intensity of measures, only membership. Common discrete scales include any yes-or-no response, matching, color choices, or practically any scale that involves selecting from among a small number of categories

Mathematical and Statistical Analysis of Scales

Discrete Measures

Page 73: Brm Unit 3 - Final

73

when someone is asked to choose from the following responses• Disagree• Neutral• Agreethe result is a discrete value that can be coded 1, 2, or 3, respectively. This is also an ordinal scale to the extent that it represents an ordered arrangement of agreement. Nominal and ordinal scales are discrete measures.

Mathematical and Statistical Analysis of Scales

Discrete Measures

Page 74: Brm Unit 3 - Final

74

Continuous measures are those assigning values anywhere along some scale range in a place that corresponds to the intensity of some concept. Ratio measures are continuous measures. Thus, when Govind measures sales for each salesperson using the rupees amount sold, he is assigning a continuous measure. A number line could be constructed ranging from the least amount sold to the most, and a spot on the line would correspond exactly to a salesperson’s performance.

Mathematical and Statistical Analysis of Scales

Continuous Measures

Page 75: Brm Unit 3 - Final

75

Strictly speaking, interval scales are not necessarily continuous. Consider the following common type of survey question:

Mathematical and Statistical Analysis of Scales

This is a discrete scale because only the values 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 can be assigned. We really have no way of knowing that the difference in agreement of somebody marking a 5 instead of a 4 is the same as the difference in agreement of somebody marking a 2 instead of a 1.

Page 76: Brm Unit 3 - Final

76

Reliability and Validity of Measurement

Reliability is an indicator of a measure’s internal consistency. Consistency is the key to understanding reliability. A measure is reliable when different attempts at measuring something converge on the same result. For example, consider an exam that has three parts: 25 multiple-choice questions, 2 essay questions, and a short case. If a student gets 20 of the 25 (80 percent) multiple-choice questions correct, we would expect she would…

Reliability

Page 77: Brm Unit 3 - Final

77

Reliability and Validity of Measurement

also score about 80 percent on the essay and case portions of the exam. Further, if a professor’s research tests are reliable, a student should tend toward consistent scores on all tests. In other words, a student who makes an 80 percent on the first test should make scores close to 80 percent on all subsequent tests.

Reliability

So, the concept of reliability revolves around consistency

Page 78: Brm Unit 3 - Final

78

Reliability and Validity of Measurement

Reliability- Internal Consistency

Represents a measure’s homogeneity or the extent to which each indicator of a concept converges on some common meaning.

split-half methodA method for assessing internal consistency by checking the results of one-half of a set of scaled items against the results from the other half.

Page 79: Brm Unit 3 - Final

79

Reliability and Validity of Measurement

Reliability- coefficient alpha ( α )

The most commonly applied estimate of a multiple-itemscale’s reliability. It represents the average of all possible split-half reliabilities for a construct.

Page 80: Brm Unit 3 - Final

80

Reliability and Validity of Measurement

Reliability- Test-retest ReliabilityThe test-retest method of determining reliability involves administering the same scale or measure to the same respondents at two separate times to test for stability. If the measure is stable over time, the test, administered under the same conditions each time, should obtain similar results.

Test-retest reliability represents a measure’s repeatability.

Page 81: Brm Unit 3 - Final

81

Reliability and Validity of Measurement

ValidityValidity is the accuracy of a measure or the extent to which a score truthfully represents a concept. In other words, are we accurately measuring what we think we are measuring?

Page 82: Brm Unit 3 - Final

82

Reliability and Validity of Measurement

Validity -The four basic approaches to establishing validity are face validity, content validity, criterion validity, and construct validity.

Establishing Validity

Face ValidityA scale’s content logically appears to reflect what was intended to be measured.

Page 83: Brm Unit 3 - Final

83

Reliability and Validity of Measurement

Validity -The four basic approaches to establishing validity are face validity, content validity, criterion validity, and construct validity.

Establishing Validity

Face ValidityA scale’s content logically appears to reflect what was intended to be measured. When an inspection of the test items convinces experts that the items match the definition, the scale is said to have face validity.

Page 84: Brm Unit 3 - Final

84

Reliability and Validity of Measurement

Does the statement “I prefer to purchase my groceries at Delavan Fine Foods” appear to capture loyalty? How about “I am very satisfied with my purchases from Delavan Fine Foods”? What about “Delavan Fine Foods offers very good value”? While the first statement appears to capture loyalty, it can be argued the second question is not loyalty but rather satisfaction. What does the third statement reflect? Do you think it looks like a loyalty statement?

Page 85: Brm Unit 3 - Final

85

Reliability and Validity of Measurement

Validity - Establishing Validity

Content ValidityThe degree that a measure covers the breadth of the domain of interest. If an exam is supposed to cover chapters 1–5, it is fair for students to expect that questions should come from all five chapters, rather than just one or two. It is also fair to assume that the questions will not come from chapter 6.

Page 86: Brm Unit 3 - Final

86

Reliability and Validity of Measurement

Validity - Establishing Validity

Criterion ValidityThe ability of a measure to correlate with other standard measures of similar constructs or established criteria. It addresses the question, “How well does my measure work in practice?” Because of this, criterion validity is sometimes referred to as pragmatic validity.

Page 87: Brm Unit 3 - Final

87

Reliability and Validity of Measurement

Validity - Establishing Validity

Construct ValidityExists when a measure reliably measures and truthfully represents a unique concept; consists of several components including face validity, content validty, criterion validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity.

Page 88: Brm Unit 3 - Final

88

Reliability and Validity of Measurement

Validity - Establishing ValidityConvergent ValidityConcepts that should be related to one another are in fact related; highly reliable scales contain convergent validity.

Discriminant ValidityRepresents how unique or distinct is a measure; a scale should not correlate too highly with a measure of a different construct.

Page 89: Brm Unit 3 - Final

All the Best