80
Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Cardiovascular Board Review I

Sohan Parekh, MD

Department of Emergency Medicine

Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Page 2: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Question 1

A 40 yo M, previous healthy presents with cough, low-grade fever, and myalgias for 3-4 days. Today he has experienced severe, sharp pleuritic chest pain radiation to the left shoulder that is worse when he is supine. He smokes one pack of cigarettes per day. Vitals signs: BP 160/95, P 110, RR 18, T 37.2 oC. A 12-lead EKG is obtained:

PEER VII Q55

Page 3: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q1 EKG

Page 4: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q1 (continued)

Appropriate next steps include:

A. ASA 325 mg, Morphine 2 mg, admit CCUB. ASA 325 mg, NTG, 0.4 mg SL x 3, heparin 4000 unit

bolus, activate cath teamC. Ketorolac 30 mg IV then ibuprofen 800 mg TID for 1

week as an outpatientD. Lidocaine 75 mg bolus then 2 mg/min infusion, labetalol

20 mg IV, admit to telemetryE. Metoprolol 5 mg IV, NTG IV infusion titrated to pain,

and cardiology consult

Page 5: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q1 Answer

Appropriate next steps include:

A. ASA 325 mg, Morphine 2 mg, admit CCUB. ASA 325 mg, NTG, 0.4 mg SL x 3, heparin 4000 unit

bolus, activate cath teamC. Ketorolac 30 mg IV then ibuprofen 800 mg TID for 1

week as an outpatientD. Lidocaine 75 mg bolus then 2 mg/min infusion, labetalol

20 mg IV, admit to telemetryE. Metoprolol 5 mg IV, NTG IV infusion titrated to pain,

and cardiology consult

Page 6: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Acute Pericarditis

• Inflammation of the pericardium• Sharp or stabbing chest pain with radiation to back,

neck, left shoulder, or arm• Worsened on inspiration or lying supine• EKG:

– Acute phase: Diffuse ST elevations (most prominent in I, V5, V6) with PR depressions (II, aVF, V4-V6)

• Isolated pericarditis will not make enzymes or have dysrhythmias

• Dispo for uncomplicated is NSAIDs for 1-3 weeks and D/C

Page 7: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Acute Pericarditis

http://urbanhealth.udmercy.edu/ekg/pdf/acutepericarditis.pdf

Page 8: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Question 2

A 50 yo M presents with an acute inferior wall MI. Following the administration of ASA and NTG, he suddenly becomes confused and diaphoretic with a BP of 70/30. Physical exam reveals JVD, clear lungs, and no evidence of a murmur.

Promes 3-9

Page 9: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q2 (continued)

What combination of therapeutic agents is most

likely to immediately stabilize this patient?

A. Heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors

B. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and clopidogrel

C. Steptokinase and magnesium

D. Normal saline bolus and dobutamine

Page 10: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q2 Answer

What combination of therapeutic agents is most

likely to immediately stabilize this patient?

A. Heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors

B. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and clopidogrel

C. Steptokinase and magnesium

D. Normal saline bolus and dobutamine

Page 11: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Right Ventricular Infact

• Complicates up to 1/3 of inferior wall MIs• EKG

– ST Elevations in II, III, aVF– Reciprocal depressions in I, aVL, V5, V6– ST Elevations in V4R to V6R on right-sided EKG

• Prone to hypotension but respond to volume and pressors / inotropes

• PCI preferred over thrombolytics• This is the classic question for RV infact

Page 12: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Right Ventricular Infact

Left Sided EKG

Right Sided EKG

http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/cgi/reprint/25/2/52.pdf

Page 13: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Question 3

The hypertensive emergency that is most easily reversible with pharmaceutical management is:

PEER VII Q240

Page 14: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q3 (continued)

A. Acute coronary syndrome

B. Aortic dissection

C. Eclampsia / pre-eclampsia

D. Encephalopathy

E. Intracranial hemorrhage

Page 15: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q3 Answer

A. Acute coronary syndrome

B. Aortic dissection

C. Eclampsia / pre-eclampsia

D. Encephalopathy

E. Intracranial hemorrhage

Page 16: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Hypertensive Emergency

• Marked elevation of BP with end-organ dysfunction otherwise HTN urgency

• Susceptible end-organs: CV, brain, kidney• Encephalopathy

– N/V– Severe Headache– Confusion decreased sensorium coma

• Rapid 25% decrease in BP is the goal

Page 17: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Hypertensive Emergency

• Rare disease, many treatment options• Precipitating causes: drugs, pregnancy• Peds

– Pheochromocytoma– Aortic coarctation– Renovascular disease

• Only emergencies require immediate treatment. Urgencies can be discharged

Page 18: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Question 4

A 75 yo F presents with decreased level of consciousness. VS are BP 70/40, P 40, RR 12, and T 36.5 oC. Blood glucose is 114. The rhythm strip should be interpreted as:

PEER VII Q92

Page 19: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q4 (continued)

A. Complete Heart Block

B. Mobitz second-degree HB, type I (Wenckebach)

C. Mobitz second-degree HB, type II

D. QT prolongation with U waves

E. Sinus bradycardia

Page 20: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q4 Answer

A. Complete Heart Block

B. Mobitz second-degree HB, type I (Wenckebach)

C. Mobitz second-degree HB, type II

D. QT prolongation with U waves

E. Sinus bradycardia

Page 21: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

AV Nodal Blocks

• Caused by conduction delay in AV node

• First-Degree– PR interval > 0.2s (200ms)

– All P waves followed by QRS

– No intervention required

http://urbanhealth.udmercy.edu/ekg/pdf/AVBlocks.pdf

Page 22: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

AV Nodal Blocks

• Second-Degree Mobitz I (Wenckebach)– Progressive lengthening of PR interval

followed by dropped beat– Seen in MI, digoxin toxicity, myocarditis, CAD– Stable rhythm

http://urbanhealth.udmercy.edu/ekg/pdf/AVBlocks.pdf

Page 23: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

AV Nodal Blocks

• Second-Degree Mobitz Type II– Fixed-length PR interval with one or more non-

conducted beats– Signifies major damage to conduction system– Unstable: Requires permanent pacemaker

Page 24: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

AV Nodal Blocks

• Third-Degree (Complete) Heart Block– No P waves are conducted through AV node– Junctional or Ventricular escape paces the heart– Unstable: Requires permanent pacemaker

http://urbanhealth.udmercy.edu/ekg/pdf/AVBlocks.pdf

Page 25: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Question 5

The most appropriate initial therapy for a patient with a pulse of 40, a BP of 70/40, and the previous EKG is:

PEER VII Q93

Page 26: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q5 (continued)

A. Atropine 1 mg IV

B. External cardiac pacemaker

C. Isoproterenol infusion at 2 mcg/min, titrate up

D. Normal saline

E. Potassium infusion at 10 mEq/hr

Page 27: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q5 Answer

A. Atropine 1 mg IV

B. External cardiac pacemaker

C. Isoproterenol infusion at 2 mcg/min, titrate up

D. Normal saline

E. Potassium infusion at 10 mEq/hr

Page 28: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Bradycardia

• Approach to undifferentiated bradycardia based on hemodynamic stability

• If stable, observe• If unstable

– Atropine 0.5 mg IVP, up to 3 mg– Dopamine or Epinephrine drip– External pacing– Transvenous pacing

Page 29: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Interlude: Wencke Back

Page 30: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Page 31: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Question 6

Which of the following statements regarding cardiac serum markers is correct?

PEER VII Q342

Page 32: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q6 (continued)

A. BNP level has little correlation with recurrent acute coronary syndromes

B. CPK appears within 1-2 hours after an acute MI and gone within 24 hours

C. Myoglobin appears within 1-2 hours after acute MI and peaks at 5-7 hours

D. Total CPK is more specific for acute cardiac ischemia than CK-MB

E. Troponins appear in the first 4 hours after an MI and are gone by 24 to 36 hours.

Page 33: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q6 Answer

A. BNP level has little correlation with recurrent acute coronary syndromes

B. CPK appears within 1-2 hours after an acute MI and gone within 24 hours

C. Myoglobin appears within 1-2 hours after acute MI and peaks at 5-7 hours

D. Total CPK is more specific for acute cardiac ischemia than CK-MB

E. Troponins appear in the first 4 hours after an MI and are gone by 24 to 36 hours.

Page 34: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Cardiac Serum Markers

• Myoglobin is the earliest

• Troponin is the most sensitive and specific

http://www.uptodateonline.com

Page 35: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Cardiac Serum Markers

• Troponins and Renal Failure– Tropnonin clearance is delayed– Troponins are not cleared by dialysis– High false-positive rate1

– Elevated troponins correlate with poor prognosis

– Any non-zero level warrants serial troponins2,3

1 Apple FS,et al. Predictive value…Circulation 2002 Dec 3;106(23):2941-5.2 http://www.kidney.org/professionals/KDOQI/guidelines_cvd/troponin.htm3 http://www.uptodateonline.com

Page 36: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Question 7

An 82 yo woman presents with 1 hour of substernal chest pressure, dyspnea, and diaphoresis. Her EKG is shown below. No old EKG is available for comparison. Her first set of cardiac enzymes is negative. Which of the following is the most appropriate treatment?

Promes Q3-4

Page 37: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q7 (continued)

Page 38: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q7 (continued)

A. Admit the patient to a monitored bed

B. Observe the patient, order serial cardiac markers and discharge if negative

C. Administer thrombolytics

D. Cardiovert the patient with 50 joules

E. Stress testing once serial cardiac enzymes are negative

Page 39: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q7 Answer

A. Admit the patient to a monitored bed

B. Observe the patient, order serial cardiac markers and discharge if negative

C. Administer thrombolytics

D. Cardiovert the patient with 50 joules

E. Stress testing once serial cardiac enzymes are negative

Page 40: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

STEMI / LBBB

• STEMI– Presence of ST elevations of greater than 1mm

in two or more anatomically contiguous leads

• LBBB– QRS > 0.12 s (120ms)– Wide, notched R wave in I, aVL, V6

– Small R and deep S in II, III, aVF, V1-V3

Page 41: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

STEMI / LBBB

• Indications for Thrombolysis / PCI– MI that meets STEMI criteria– MI symptoms and new LBBB– Acute Posterior MI

• Isolated ST-segment depression of at least 1mm in 2 or more leads from V1-V4

ACEP Clinical Policy: Indications for Reperfusion Therapy…Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48:358-383.

Page 42: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Question 8

Which of the following statements is true concerning infective endocarditis in IV drug users?

PEER V Q9

Page 43: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q8 (continued)

A. Most commonly affects the mitral valueB. Rarely associated with septic emboliC. Cardiac murmurs frequently are absent at

initial presentationD. Steptococcus viridans is the most common

causative organismE. The majority of patients have previously

damaged heart valves

Page 44: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q8 Answer

A. Most commonly affects the mitral valueB. Rarely associated with septic emboliC. Cardiac murmurs frequently are absent at

initial presentationD. Steptococcus viridans is the most common

causative organismE. The majority of patients have previously

damaged heart valves

Page 45: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

IVDU Endocarditis

• Presentation can vary from subacute to acute onset of fever, dyspnea, weakness, tachycardia, dysrhythmias

• High index of suspicion: IVDU patients with fever• Skin flora is most common: Staph aureus,

including MRSA• Tricuspid is most commonly affected in IVDU• In ED, obtain multiple cultures, treat with Abx• Antibiotics: vancomycin + gent +/- rifampin

Page 46: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Question 9

Which of the following drugs can be used to treat a patient with known Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome who presents with the rhythm depicted below:

PEER VII Q126

Page 47: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q9 (continued)

A. Adenosine

B. Digoxin

C. Diltiazem

D. Metoprolol

E. Procainamide

PEER VII Q126

Page 48: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q9 Answer

A. Adenosine

B. Digoxin

C. Diltiazem

D. Metoprolol

E. Procainamide

Page 49: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Wolff-Parkinson-White

• Syndrome of pre-excitation due to accessory pathway from atria to ventricles

• EKG– Short PR interval– Delta wave: slurred upstroke of QRS complex

http://medicalfinals.co.uk/QuizJanuary2006Answers.html

Page 50: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Wolff-Parkinson-White

• Orthodromic (narrow complex) AVRT– Anterograde conduction in accessory tract– Adenosine 6 mg IV or Verapamil 5 to 10 mg IV

• Antidromic (wide complex) AVRT or Afib / Aflut– Retrograde conduction in accessory tract– No AV nodal blockers– If stable: amiodarone or procainamide– If unstable: synchonized cardioversion

Page 51: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Question 10

An 8 yo boy presents with history of chest pain that gradually worsened while he was watching television with his mother. The pain lasted 2 hours and then resolved without intervention. There was no associated dyspnea or syncope. He has no significant past medical history. Family history includes a grandmother who died of a heart attack. Physical exam, ECG, and CXR are normal. What is the most appropriate next step in the emergency department?

PEER VII Q338

Page 52: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q10 (continued)

A. Administer albuterol and check peak flowB. Discharge home with primary care

followupC. Laboratory evaluation, including cardiac

markersD. Observation admission for treadmill

testingE. Outpatient echo and Holter monitor

Page 53: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q10 Answer

A. Administer albuterol and check peak flowB. Discharge home with primary care

followupC. Laboratory evaluation, including cardiac

markersD. Observation admission for treadmill

testingE. Outpatient echo and Holter monitor

Page 54: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Pediatric Chest Pain

• Rarely serious unless accompanied by– Syncope– Dyspnea– Fever– Congential Heart Disease

• Cyanosis

• Congestive Heart Failure

• Return to regular activity is the norm

Page 55: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Interlude:Fat Kids

Page 56: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Page 57: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Question 11

A 60 yo F with a history of end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis presents unresponsive with only a weak carotid pulse. Cardiac monitoring is started (see below), and CPR is initiated. Intravenous access is established, and the patient is intubated. The next step in management should be:

PEER VII Q300

Page 58: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q11 (continued)

http://sprojects.mmi.mcgill.ca/heart/ecgk1.html

Page 59: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q11 (continued)

A. Atropine 1 mg IV, amiodarone 300 mg IV slow push

B. Calcium chloride 1 amp IV, insulin 10 units IV, and dextrose 50 g IV

C. Dopamine wide open, and prepare for external pacemaking

D. Magnesium sulfate 2 g slow IV push, potassium chloride 10 mEq over 20 minutes

E. Normal saline 500 mL bolus and pericardiocentesis

Page 60: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q11 Answer

A. Atropine 1 mg IV, amiodarone 300 mg IV slow push

B. Calcium chloride 1 amp IV, insulin 10 units IV, and dextrose 50 g IV

C. Dopamine wide open, and prepare for external pacemaking

D. Magnesium sulfate 2 g slow IV push, potassium chloride 10 mEq over 20 minutes

E. Normal saline 500 mL bolus and pericardiocentesis

Page 61: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Hyperkalemia

• EKG changes– Peaked T waves

– PR prolongation

– QRS prolongation, P wave flattening

– Loss of P wave, QRS prolongation to sine wave

Webster, et al. Recognising signs of danger. Emerg. Med. J., Jan 2002; 19: 74 – 77.

Page 62: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Hyperkalemia

http://sprojects.mmi.mcgill.ca/heart/ecgk1.htmlhttp://urbanhealth.udmercy.edu/ekg/pdf/hyperkalemia.pdf

Page 63: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Hyperkalemia

• Treatment– Calcium chloride or gluconate

– Dextrose + Insulin

– Bicarbonate

– Lasix

– Albuterol

– Kayexalate

Page 64: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Question 12

A 49 yo M presents after he fainted while running on his treadmill at home. He has been having exertional dyspnea and angina for the past several months. Which of the following disease is most likely to cause these symptoms?

PEER VII Q230

Page 65: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q12 (continued)

A. Aortic stenosis

B. Pulmonary embolus

C. Mitral incompetence

D. Pulmonary stenosis

E. Tricuspid incompetence

Page 66: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q12 Answer

A. Aortic stenosis

B. Pulmonary embolus

C. Mitral incompetence

D. Pulmonary stenosis

E. Tricuspid incompetence

Page 67: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Aortic Stenosis

• Bimodal distribution– Under 65: bicuspid aortic valve– Over 65: calcific degeneration

• Outflow tract obstruction with LVH• Crescendo-decrescendo systolic murmur • Classic symptoms

– DOE– Syncope– Angina

• This is the classic AS question

Page 68: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Question 13

Which of the following is the most common ECG abnormality associated with mitral valve prolapse?

PEER VII Q222

Page 69: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q13 (continued)

A. Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

B. QT prolongation

C. Rapid atrial fibrillation

D. ST-segment depression in leads II, III, aVF

E. Ventricular tachycardia

Page 70: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q13 Answer

A. Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

B. QT prolongation

C. Rapid atrial fibrillation

D. ST-segment depression in leads II, III, aVF

E. Ventricular tachycardia

Page 71: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Mitral Valve Prolapse

• Most common valvular heart disease – 2.4%• Usually asymptomatic• When symptomatic

– Non-exertional chest pain– Palpitations– Fatigue– Dyspnea unrelated to exertion– Increased incidence of WPW

• Echo and outpatient cardiology management

Page 72: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Question 14

A 70 yo M complains of severe diffuse abdominal discomfort that began in his lower epigastric region 3 hours earlier, shortly after he ate burger and fries. He denies chest pain, SOB, and flank pain. He has a history of CHF. Physical exam reveals an elderly man in severe discomfort. Vital signs are remarkable for only a mild tachycardia. The abdomen is soft and nondistended, with diffuse pain to all areas on palpation. There is no rebound. Pulses are normal; there are no bruits or masses. What is the most likely diagnosis?

PEER VII Q19

Page 73: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q14 (continued)

A. Mesenteric ischemia

B. MI

C. Aortic dissection

D. Pancreatitis

E. Ruptured abdominal aneurysm

Page 74: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q14 Answer

A. Mesenteric ischemia

B. MI

C. Aortic dissection

D. Pancreatitis

E. Ruptured abdominal aneurysm

Page 75: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Mesenteric Ischemia

• Elderly patients with severe pain out of proportion to the physical exam

• Pain is poorly localized• Risk factors

– Atrial Fibrillation– Vascular disease– CHF– Hypercoagulability

Page 76: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Mesenteric Ischemia

• Acute: thromboembolic phenomena• Chronic: usually due to long-standing

atherosclerotic disease (intestinal angina)• High mortality due to risk of bowel necrosis• Workup

– CT Angio vs conventional angiography– Serial lactate levels– Early surgical consultation

Page 77: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Question 15

Which of the following patients is the most appropriate candidate for pacing therapy with a transcutaneous cardiac pacemaker?

PEER V Q2

Page 78: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q15 (continued)

A. 25 yo severely hypothermic M with marked bradycardia; BP undetectable, P 30

B. 43 yo M with bradysystolic cardiac arrest for 40 minutes, BP undetectable, P 15

C. 61 yo F with 1st degree AV block and sinus bradycardia unresponsive to 1 mg atropine; BP 90/60, P 48

D. 58 yo F with 3rd degree AV block unresponsive to 3 mg atropine, BP 80/50, P 40

E. 78 yo M with Mobitz I second-degree AV block, BP 90/40, P 70

Page 79: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Q15 Answer

A. 25 yo severely hypothermic M with marked bradycardia; BP undetectable, P 30

B. 43 yo M with bradysystolic cardiac arrest for 40 minutes, BP undetectable, P 15

C. 61 yo F with 1st degree AV block and sinus bradycardia unresponsive to 1 mg atropine; BP 90/60, P 48

D. 58 yo F with 3rd degree AV block unresponsive to 3 mg atropine, BP 80/50, P 40

E. 78 yo M with Mobitz I second-degree AV block, BP 90/40, P 70

Page 80: Cardiovascular Board Review I Sohan Parekh, MD Department of Emergency Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Bradycardia

• Approach to undifferentiated bradycardia based on hemodynamic stability

• If stable, observe• If unstable

– Atropine 0.5 mg IVP, up to 3 mg– Dopamine or Epinephrine drip– External pacing– Transvenous pacing