1
Cathode-Drift Compensation in D-C Amplifiers J. W. RITTENHOUSE MEMBER AIEE » Π PHENOMENON of cathode drift represents one X of the more troublesome sources of drift in direct- coupled amplifiers, and although the exact mechanisms involved have not been completely explained, it is generally accepted that the conditions of drift can be simulated, for analytical purposes, by the assumption of a random noise-voltage generator in series with the cathode of the tube in question. Such an assumption provides the basis in this article for the analysis of the Miller Circuit which seems to have an excellent abiUty to compensate for the effects of cathode drift, but which has had associated with it the limiting condition that the amplifier load resistance, in Figure 1, must be large enough to make the amplifier plate cur- rent, /i, small compared to 2> The purpose of this article is to demonstrate that such a limitation does not exist and to propose a variation of the Miller Circuit which has some advantages in many applications. The a-c equivalent circuit for the Miller Circuit with the grid of grounded, is shown in Figure 2 where ri, , 2, and 2 are respectively the plate resistances and ampli- fication factors of T\ and 2. An analysis of Figure 1 reveals that with the grid of Ti grounded: and (1) (2) Using equation 1 to sum the voltage around the top loop of Figure 2, the following expression is obtained: 21 [ ( m i -f- 1) (/?! +I ?L + ^·2( + 1 ) ( +/?2) = (iu 1 +1 (3) Ebb2 Ebb I Figure 1. The Miller Circuit showing the equivalent cathode noise-voltage generator, c„ W W - W W Figure 2. A-c equivalent circuit for Miller Circuit showing the equivalent cathode noise-voltage generator e^ A similar summation around the bottom loop of Figure 2, yields the following expression: il [(M2+L )/?l +/?2]+l2 [(/X2 + L )/?l +/?2+r2]=(M2 + L>N (4) Simultaneous solution of equations 3 and 4 for ii and equating dii/de^ to zero yields as a criterion for cathode- drift compensation: gm2 (5) where gm2 is the transconductance of T2. This result is identical to the one obtained by Miller, but no assumption whatsoever, regarding the relative magnitudes of resistances or currents, is made here; so it would appear that this circuit should provide compensa- tion whether R^, Figure 1, is large or small. If the resistor, Ri, in Figure 1 is short-circuited and a load resistor is introduced into the plate lead of T2, the noise voltages that otherwise would develop in Ri, and undergo amplification by the tube, can be eliminated with little sacrifice in cathode-drift compensation provided that in the new circuit the remaining cathode resistor, R2, is made equal to {l/gm2 + ^l 2/ m 2) where R^z, gm2 and 2 are respectively: plate load resistor, transconductance, and amplification factor for T2. Since the foregoing findings have been experimentally confirmed, it is believed that this discussion will serve to broaden the potential field of application of the original Miller Circuit by removing an unnecessary Hmitation. It is further believed that appreciable benefit may be derived from the additional possibilities that are available through the proposed modification of Miller's circuit. Digest of paper 52-244, "Cathode-Drift Compensation in D-C Amplifiers," recom- mended by the AIEE Committee on Electronics and approved by the AIEE Technical Program Committee for presentation at the AIEE Pacific General Meeting, Phn*inix, Ariz., August 19-22, 1952. Not scheduled for publication in AIEE Transactions. J. W. Rittenhouse is with the University of Missouri, Rolla, Mo. APRIL 1953 Rittenhouse—Cathode-Drift Compensation 299

Cathode-drift compensation in D-C amplifiers

  • Upload
    j-w

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Cathode-Drift Compensation in D-C Amplifiers

J. W . R I T T E N H O U S E M E M B E R A I E E

» Τ Π Η Ε P H E N O M E N O N of c a t h o d e drift r ep resen t s o n e X of t h e m o r e t r o u b l e s o m e sources of drift in d i r ec t -

c o u p l e d ampli f iers , a n d a l t h o u g h t h e exac t m e c h a n i s m s involved h a v e n o t b e e n c o m p l e t e l y e x p l a i n e d , it is gene ra l l y a c c e p t e d t h a t t h e cond i t i ons of drift c a n b e s i m u l a t e d , for ana ly t i ca l pu rposes , b y t h e a s s u m p t i o n of a r a n d o m noise-vol tage g e n e r a t o r in series w i t h t h e c a t h o d e of t h e t u b e in ques t ion .

S u c h a n a s s u m p t i o n p rov ides t h e basis in this a r t i c le for t h e analysis of t h e Mi l l e r C i r cu i t w h i c h seems to h a v e a n excel lent abiUty t o c o m p e n s a t e for t h e effects of c a t h o d e drift, b u t w h i c h has h a d associa ted w i t h it t h e l im i t i ng cond i t ion t h a t t h e ampl i f ie r l oad res i s tance , in F i g u r e 1, m u s t b e l a rge e n o u g h to m a k e t h e ampl i f ie r p l a t e c u r ­r e n t , / i , smal l c o m p a r e d to ΐ2> T h e p u r p o s e of this a r t i c le is to d e m o n s t r a t e t h a t s u c h a l im i t a t i on does n o t exist a n d to p ropose a v a r i a t i o n of t h e M i l l e r C i r cu i t w h i c h h a s some a d v a n t a g e s in m a n y app l i ca t i ons .

T h e a-c e q u i v a l e n t c i rcu i t for t h e Mi l l e r C i r cu i t w i t h t h e gr id of Γ ι g r o u n d e d , is s h o w n in F i g u r e 2 w h e r e r i , μ ι , Γ2, a n d μ2 a r e respec t ive ly t h e p l a t e res is tances a n d a m p l i ­fication factors of T\ a n d Γ2.

A n analys is of F i g u r e 1 revea l s t h a t w i t h t h e g r id of Ti g r o u n d e d :

a n d

(1)

(2)

U s i n g e q u a t i o n 1 to s u m t h e vo l t age a r o u n d t h e t o p l oop of F i g u r e 2, t h e fol lowing express ion is o b t a i n e d :

21 [ ( m i - f -1 ) (/?! + I ? L + ^·2(μι + 1 ) (Λι + / ? 2 ) = (iu 1 + 1 (3)

ό ό Ebb2 Ebb I

Figure 1. The Miller Circuit showing the equivalent cathode

noise-voltage generator, c„

W W

βη Λ Λ Λ Λ - Α Λ Λ Λ

W W

Figure 2. A-c equivalent circuit for Miller Circuit showing the equivalent cathode noise-voltage generator e^

A s imi la r s u m m a t i o n a r o u n d t h e b o t t o m loop of F i g u r e 2 , yields t h e fol lowing exp re s s ion :

i l [ ( M 2 + L ) / ? l + / ? 2 ] + l 2 [ ( / X 2 + L ) / ? l + / ? 2 + r 2 ] = ( M 2 + L>N (4)

S i m u l t a n e o u s so lu t ion of e q u a t i o n s 3 a n d 4 for ii a n d e q u a t i n g dii/de^ t o z e r o yie lds as a c r i t e r ion for c a t h o d e -drift c o m p e n s a t i o n :

gm2 (5)

w h e r e gm2 is t h e t r a n s c o n d u c t a n c e of T2. T h i s resu l t is i den t i ca l t o t h e o n e o b t a i n e d b y Mi l l e r ,

b u t n o a s s u m p t i o n w h a t s o e v e r , r e g a r d i n g t h e re la t ive m a g n i t u d e s of res i s tances o r c u r r e n t s , is m a d e h e r e ; so it w o u l d a p p e a r t h a t th is c i rcu i t shou ld p r o v i d e c o m p e n s a ­t ion w h e t h e r R^, F i g u r e 1, is l a rg e or smal l .

If t h e resistor, Ri, in F i g u r e 1 is shor t - c i r cu i t ed a n d a load resistor is i n t r o d u c e d i n t o t h e p l a t e l e a d of T2, t h e noise vo l tages t h a t o the rwi se w o u l d d e v e l o p in Ri, a n d u n d e r g o ampl i f i ca t ion b y t h e t u b e , c a n b e e l i m i n a t e d w i t h l i t t le sacrifice in ca thode -d r i f t c o m p e n s a t i o n p r o v i d e d t h a t in t h e n e w c i rcu i t t h e r e m a i n i n g c a t h o d e resistor , R2, is m a d e e q u a l t o {l/gm2 + ^ l2 /m2) w h e r e R^z, gm2 a n d μ2 a r e r e spec t i ve ly : p l a t e l oad resis tor , t r a n s c o n d u c t a n c e , a n d ampl i f i ca t ion factor for T2.

Since t h e foregoing findings h a v e b e e n e x p e r i m e n t a l l y con f i rmed , it is be l i eved t h a t th is discussion wil l se rve to b r o a d e n t h e p o t e n t i a l field of a p p l i c a t i o n of t h e o r ig ina l M i l l e r C i r cu i t b y r e m o v i n g a n u n n e c e s s a r y Hmi ta t ion . I t is fu r the r be l i eved t h a t a p p r e c i a b l e benefi t m a y b e de r ived from t h e a d d i t i o n a l possibil i t ies t h a t a r e a v a i l a b l e t h r o u g h t h e p r o p o s e d modi f i ca t ion of Mi l l e r ' s c i rcu i t .

Digest of paper 52-244, "Cathode-Drift Compensation in D-C Amplifiers," recom­mended by the AIEE Committee on Electronics and approved by the AIEE Technical Program Committee for presentation at the AIEE Pacific General Meeting, Phn*inix, Ariz., August 19-22, 1952. Not scheduled for publication in AIEE Transactions.

J . W. Rittenhouse is with the University of Missouri, Rolla, Mo.

A P R I L 1953 Rittenhouse—Cathode-Drift Compensation 299