Chapter 1900 Protest

Protest Under 37 CFR 1.2911901 Who Can Protest1901.01 Information Which Can Be Relied onin Protest

1901.02

How Protest Is Submitted1901.03 When Should the Protest BeSubmitted

1901.04

Initial Office Handling andAcknowledgment of Protest

1901.05

Examiner Treatment of Protest1901.06 Protestor Participation1901.07

Filing of Multiple Papers Relatingto Same Issues

1901.07(a)

[Reserved]1902-1905 Supervisory Review of an Examiner’sDecision Adverse to Protestor

1906

Unauthorized Participation byProtestor

1907

[Reserved]1908-1919 Citation of Prior Art Under 37 CFR1.501(a)

1920

[ Editor Note: This chapter was not substantivelyrevised for the Ninth Edition of the MPEP. Eachsection has a revision indicator of “[R-08.2012],”meaning that the section as reproduced in thisEdition is the version in force in August 2012 withthe following exceptions: 1) As a result of thepublication process, form paragraphs reproducedin this chapter reflect the text used by examinerseffective November 2013 rather than those in forcein August 2012; 2) The marks indicating added ordeleted text from prior revisions have been removed;and 3) The notation “[Reserved]” has been addedfor section numbers previously missing in thehierarchy (i.e., section numbers that were never usedor no longer have text). See the ninth revision of theEighth Edition of the MPEP published August 2012as posted on the USPTO Web site on the MPEPArchives page (http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/old/index.htm) for the text of formparagraphs in force in August 2012 and the priorrevision marks.]

1901 Protest Under 37 CFR 1.291[R-08.2012]

37 CFR 1.291 Protests by the public against pendingapplications.

(a) A protest may be filed by a member of the public againsta pending application, and it will be matched with the applicationfile if it adequately identifies the patent application. A protest

submitted within the time frame of paragraph (b) of this section,which is not matched in a timely manner to permit review bythe examiner during prosecution, due to inadequateidentification, may not be entered and may be returned to theprotestor where practical, or, if return is not practical, discarded.

(b) The protest will be entered into the record of theapplication if, in addition to complying with paragraph (c) ofthis section, the protest has been served upon the applicant inaccordance with § 1.248, or filed with the Office in duplicatein the event service is not possible; and, except for paragraph(b)(1) of this section, the protest was filed prior to the date theapplication was published under § 1.211, or a notice ofallowance under § 1.311 was mailed, whichever occurs first:

(1) If a protest is accompanied by the written consentof the applicant, the protest will be considered if the protest ismatched with the application in time to permit review duringprosecution.

(2) A statement must accompany a protest that it is thefirst protest submitted in the application by the real party ininterest who is submitting the protest; or the protest must complywith paragraph (c)(5) of this section. This section does not applyto the first protest filed in an application.

(c) In addition to compliance with paragraphs (a) and (b)of this section, a protest must include.

(1) A listing of the patents, publication, or otherinformation relied upon;

(2) A concise explanation of the relevance of each itemlisted pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of this section;

(3) A copy of each listed patent, publication, or otheritem of information in written form, or at least the pertinentportions thereof;

(4) An English language translation of all the necessaryand pertinent parts of any non-English language patent,publication, or other item of information relied upon; and

(5) If it is a second or subsequent protest by the sameparty in interest, an explanation as to why the issue(s) raised inthe second or subsequent protest are significantly different thanthose raised earlier and why the significantly different issue(s)were not presented earlier, and a processing fee under § 1.17(i)must be submitted.

(d) A member of the public filing a protest in an applicationunder this section will not receive any communication from theOffice relating to the protest, other than the return of aself-addressed postcard which the member of the public mayinclude with the protest in order to receive an acknowledgementby the Office that the protest has been received. The limitedinvolvement of the member of the public filing a protest pursuantto this section ends with the filing of the protest, and no furthersubmission on behalf of the protestor will be considered, unlessthe submission is made pursuant to paragraph (c)(5) of thissection.

(e) Where a protest raising inequitable conduct issuessatisfies the provisions of this section for entry, it will be enteredinto the application file, generally without comment on theinequitable conduct issues raised in it.

(f) In the absence of a request by the Office, an applicanthas no duty to, and need not, reply to a protest.

March 20141900-1

(g) Protests that fail to comply with paragraphs (b) or (c)of this section may not be entered, and if not entered, will bereturned to the protestor, or discarded, at the option of the Office.

37 CFR 1.248 Service of papers; manner of service; proofof service; proof of service in cases other than interferences.

(a) Service of papers must be on the attorney or agent ofthe party if there be such or on the party if there is no attorneyor agent, and may be made in any of the following ways:

(1) By delivering a copy of the paper to the personserved;

(2) By leaving a copy at the usual place of business ofthe person served with someone in his employment;

(3) When the person served has no usual place ofbusiness, by leaving a copy at the person’s residence, with someperson of suitable age and discretion who resides there;

(4) Transmission by first class mail. When service isby mail the date of mailing will be regarded as the date ofservice;

(5) Whenever it shall be satisfactorily shown to theDirector that none of the above modes of obtaining or servingthe paper is practicable, service may be by notice published inthe Official Gazette.

(b) Papers filed in the Patent and Trademark Office whichare required to be served shall contain proof of service. Proofof service may appear on or be affixed to papers filed. Proof ofservice shall include the date and manner of service. In the caseof personal service, proof of service shall also include the nameof any person served, certified by the person who made service.Proof of service may be made by:

(1) An acknowledgement of service by or on behalf ofthe person served or

(2) A statement signed by the attorney or agentcontaining the information required by this section.

(c) See § 41.106(e) of this title for service of papers incontested cases before the Board of Patent Appeals andInterferences.

The degree of participation allowed a protestor issolely within the discretion of the Director of theUSPTO.

37 CFR 1.291 gives recognition to the value ofwritten protests in bringing information to theattention of the Office and in avoiding the issuanceof invalid patents. With the exception of a protestaccompanied by a written consent of the applicant,all protests must be submitted prior to the publicationof the application or the mailing of a notice ofallowance, whichever occurs first. No protest orother form of preissuance opposition to the grant ofa patent may be initiated after publication of theapplication without the applicant’s express writtenconsent as specified by 35 U.S.C. 122(c).

It is noted that a protest filed in a reissue applicationis not a “form of preissuance opposition to the grantof a patent” since the patent to be reissued hasalready been granted. Thus, a protest may be filedin a reissue application throughout the pendency ofthe reissue application prior to the date of mailingof a notice of allowance subject to the timingconstraints of the examination. A protest with regardto a reissue application should, however, be filedwithin the 2-month period following theannouncement of the filing of the reissue applicationin the Official Gazette. See MPEP § 1441.01 forguidance as to the filing of a protest in a reissueapplication.

37 CFR 1.291(b) provides that a protest will beentered into the record of the application if, inaddition to complying with the requirements of 37CFR 1.291(c), the protest is either served upon theapplicant, or is filed in duplicate in the event serviceis not possible. In the event a duplicate protest isenclosed for the applicant, the protest should beaccompanied by an explanation of why service onapplicant could not be made.

37 CFR 1.291(c) requires that the protest mustinclude:

(A) a listing of the patents, publications, or otherinformation relied on;

(B) a concise explanation of the relevance ofeach listed item;

(C) a copy of each listed patent, publication, orother item of information in written form, or at leastthe pertinent portions thereof;

(D) an English language translation of allnecessary and pertinent parts of any non-Englishlanguage patent, publication, or other informationrelied upon; and

(E) if the protest is a second or subsequentprotest by the same real party in interest, the protestmust further include:

""(1) an explanation as to why the issue(s)being raised in the second or subsequent protest aresignificantly different than those raised earlier;

""(2) an explanation as to why thesignificantly different issue(s) were not presented tothe Office earlier; and

1900-2March 2014

MANUAL OF PATENT EXAMINING PROCEDURE§ 1901

""(3) the processing fee under 37 CFR1.17(i).

Note that item (E) above does not apply if the protestis accompanied by a statement that it is the firstprotest submitted in the application by the real partyin interest, or if the protest is the first protest ever tobe filed in the application. 37 CFR 1.291(b)(2).

A party obtaining knowledge of an applicationpending in the Office may file a protest against theapplication and may therein call attention to anyfacts within protestor’s knowledge which, in theprotestor’s opinion, would make the grant of a patenton the application improper. The party shouldinclude with the protest whatever information theparty is aware of that would facilitate identificationof the application and matching the protest with theapplication. If there is insufficient information toidentify the application, the protest may not bematched at all or not timely matched with theintended application to permit review by theexaminer during prosecution of the application, inwhich case, the protest may not be entered and maybe returned to the protestor where practical. If returnis not practical, the protest will be discarded. 37 CFR1.291(a). See MPEP § 1901.03.

A protestor does not, by the mere filing of a protest,obtain the “right” to argue the protest before theOffice. Active participation by a protestor ends withthe filing of the protest, and no further submissionon behalf of the protestor will be considered, unlessthe submission is made pursuant to 37 CFR1.291(c)(5). See 37 CFR 1.291(d). The USPTO willacknowledge the receipt of a protest in an originalor a reissue application file , only if a self-addressedpostcard is included with the protest (see MPEP§ 1901.05). The question of whether or not a patentwill issue is a matter between the applicant and theOffice acting on behalf of the public.

1901.01 Who Can Protest [R-08.2012]

Any member of the public, including private persons,corporate entities, and government agencies, mayfile a protest under 37 CFR 1.291. A protest may befiled by an attorney or other representative on behalfof an unnamed real party in interest. 37 CFR 1.291does not require that the real party in interest be

identified. Where a protest is not the first protest bythe real party in interest, 37 CFR 1.291(b)(2) requirescompliance with 37 CFR 1.291(c)(5). Therequirements of 37 CFR 1.291(c)(5) cannot beavoided by multiple protests submitted by differentpeople representing the same real party in interest.

1901.02 Information Which Can Be Reliedon in Protest [R-08.2012]

Any information which, in the protestor’s opinion,would make the grant of a patent improper can berelied on in a protest under 37 CFR 1.291. Whileprior art documents, such as patents and publications,are most often the types of information relied on inprotests, 37 CFR 1.291 is not limited to prior artdocuments. Protests may be based on any facts orinformation adverse to patentability. The contentand substance of the protest are more important thanwhether prior art documents, or some other form ofevidence adverse to patentability, are being reliedon. The Office recognizes that when evidence otherthan prior art documents is relied on, problems mayarise as to authentication and the probative value toassign to such evidence. However, the fact that suchproblems may arise, and have to be resolved, doesnot preclude the Office from considering suchevidence, nor does it mean that such evidence cannotbe relied on in a protest under 37 CFR 1.291.Information in a protest should be set forth in themanner required by 37 CFR 1.291(c).

The following are examples of the kinds ofinformation, in addition to prior art documents,which can be relied on in a protest under 37 CFR1.291:

(A) Information demonstrating that theinven-tion was publicly “known or used by othersin this country... before the invention thereof by theapplicant for patent” and is therefore barred under35 U.S.C. 102(a) and/or 103.

(B) Information that the invention was “in publicuse or on sale in this country, more than 1 year priorto the date of the application for patent in the UnitedStates” (35 U.S.C. 102(b)).

(C) Information that the applicant “hasabandoned the invention” (35 U.S.C. 102(c)) or “didnot himself invent the subject matter sought to bepatented” (35 U.S.C. 102(f)).

March 20141900-3

§ 1901.02PROTEST

(D) Information relating to inventorship under35 U.S.C. 102(g).

(E) Information relating to sufficiency ofdisclosure or failure to disclose best mode, under 35U.S.C. 112.

(F) Any other information demonstrating thatthe application lacks compliance with the statutoryrequirements for patentability.

(G) Information indicating “fraud” or “violationof the duty of disclosure” under 37 CFR 1.56 maybe the subject of a protest under 37 CFR 1.291.Protests raising fraud or other inequitable conductissues will be entered in the application file,generally without comment on those issues. 37 CFR1.291(e).

Different forms of evidence may accompany, or besubmitted as a part of, a protest under 37 CFR 1.291.Conventional prior art documents such as patentsand publications are the most common form ofevidence. However, other forms of evidence canlikewise be submitted. Some representative examplesof other forms of evidence are litigation-relatedmaterials such as complaints, answers, depositions,answers to interrogatories, exhibits, transcripts ofhearings or trials, court orders and opinions,stipulations of the parties, etc. Where only a portionof the litigation-related materials is relevant to theprotest, protestors are encouraged to submit only therelevant portion(s).

In a protest based on an alleged public use or saleby, or on behalf of, the applicant or applicant’sassignee, evidence of such public use or sale maybe submitted along with affidavits or declarationsidentifying the source(s) of the evidence andexplaining its relevance and meaning. Such evidencemight include documents containing offers for saleby applicant or applicant’s assignee, orders, invoices,receipts, delivery schedules, etc. The Office willmake a decision as to whether or not public use orsale has been established based on the evidence theOffice has available. If applicant denies theauthenticity of the documents and/or evidence, or ifthe alleged public use and/or sale is by a party otherthan applicant or applicant’s assignee, protestor mayfind it desirable or necessary to proceed via 37 CFR1.292 (public use proceedings) rather than by aprotest under 37 CFR 1.291.

While the forms in which evidence and/orinformation may be submitted with, or as a part of,a protest under 37 CFR 1.291, are not limited,protestors must recognize that such submissions mayencounter problems such as establishing authenticityand/or the probative value to apply to the evidence.Obviously, the Office will have to evaluate eachitem of evidence and/or information submitted witha view as to both its authenticity and what weight togive thereto.

Information which is subject to a court-imposedprotective or secrecy order may be submitted with,or as a part of, a protest under 37 CFR 1.291. Tradesecret information which was obtained by a protestorthrough agreements with others can likewise besubmitted. Such information, if submitted, will betreated in accordance with the guidelines set forthin MPEP § 724 and will be made public if areasonable examiner would consider the informationimportant in deciding whether to allow theapplication to issue as a patent.

1901.03 How Protest Is Submitted[R-08.2012]

A protest under 37 CFR 1.291 must be submitted inwriting, must specifically identify the application towhich the protest is directed by application numberor serial number and filing date, and must include alisting of all patents, publications, or otherinformation relied on; a concise explanation of therelevance of each listed item; an English languagetranslation of all relevant parts of any non-Englishlanguage patent, publication, or other informationrelied upon; and be accompanied by a copy of eachpatent, publication, or other document relied on.Protestors are encouraged to use form PTO/SB/08Aand 08B “Information Disclosure Statement ByApplicant” (or an equivalent form) when preparinga protest under 37 CFR 1.291, especially the listingenumerated under 37 CFR 1.291(c)(1). See MPEP§ 609.04(a). In addition, the protest and anyaccompanying papers must either (1) reflect that acopy of the same has been served upon the applicantor upon the applicant’s attorney or agent of record;or (2) be filed with the Office in duplicate in theevent service is not possible.

1900-4March 2014

MANUAL OF PATENT EXAMINING PROCEDURE§ 1901.03

It is important that any protest against a pendingapplication specifically identify the application towhich the protest is directed with the identificationbeing as complete as possible. If possible, thefollowing information should be placed on theprotest:

(A) Name of Applicant(s).

(B) Application number (mandatory).

(C) Filing date of application.

(D) Title of invention.

(E) Group art unit number (if known).

(F) Name of examiner to whom the applicationis assigned (if known).

(G) Current status and location of application(if known).

(H) The word “ATTENTION:” followed by thearea of the Office to which the protest is directed asset forth below.

In addition to the above information, the protest itselfshould be clearly identified as a “PROTEST UNDER37 CFR 1.291.” If the protest includes exhibits orother attachments, these should also containidentifying information thereon in order to preventthem from becoming inadvertently separated andlost.

Any protest can be submitted by mail to theCommissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450,Alexandria, VA 22313-1450, and should be directedto the attention of the Director of the particularTechnology Center in which the application ispending. If the protestor is unable to specificallyidentify the application to which the protest isdirected, but, nevertheless, believes such anapplication to be pending, the protest should bedirected to the attention of the Office of Petitions(using Mail Stop Petition), along with as muchidentifying data for the application as possible.Protests which do not adequately identify a pendingpatent application will be returned to the protestoror discarded, and will not be further considered bythe Office.

Where a protest is directed to a reissue applicationfor a patent which is involved in litigation, theoutside envelope and the top right-hand portion of

the protest should be marked with the words“REISSUE LITIGATION.” The notations preferablyshould be written in a bright color with a felt pointmarker. Any “REISSUE LITIGATION” protestmailed to the Office should be so marked and mailedto Mail Stop Petition, Commissioner for Patents,P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.

INITIAL PROTEST SUBMISSION MUST BECOMPLETE

A protest must be complete and contain a copy ofevery document relied on by the protestor, whetherthe document is a prior art document, court litigationmaterial, affidavit, or declaration, etc., because aprotestor will not be given an opportunity tosupplement or complete any protest which isincomplete. Active participation by protestor endswith the filing of the initial protest, as provided in37 CFR 1.291( d), and no further submission onbehalf of protestor will be acknowledged orconsidered, unless the submission is made pursuantto 37 CFR 1.291(c)(5). 37 CFR 1.291(c)(5) requiresthat any further submission by the same party ininterest must be directed to significantly differentissue(s) than those raised in the earlier protest. 37CFR 1.291(c)(5) requires (A) an explanation as tohow the issue(s) raised are significantly different,(B) why the different issue(s) were not presented inthe earlier protest, and (C) the processing fee under37 CFR 1.17(i). Submissions which will not beentered in the application file include furthersubmissions in violation of 37 CFR 1.291 by whichprotestor merely seeks to participate in theexamination process. For example, mere argumentsrelating to an Office action or an applicant’s replywould not qualify as a new protest. Likewise,additional comments seeking to bring in further oreven new data or information with respect to an issuepreviously raised by protestor would not qualify asa new protest. The Office will not add thesearguments or comments to the original protest andwill not enter them in the application file.

Even new protests which also argue Office actionsor replies or any matter beyond the new issue shouldnot be accepted. Improper protests will be returnedto the protestor, or discarded, at the option of theOffice. 37 CFR 1.291(g). While improper protestswill be returned or discarded, a new protest by an

March 20141900-5

§ 1901.03PROTEST

earlier protestor will be proper and can be enteredif it complies with 37 CFR 1.291(c)(5).

As indicated in 37 CFR 1.291( c)(3), a protest mustbe accompanied by a copy of each prior art documentrelied on in order to ensure consideration by theexaminer, although a protest without copies of priorart documents will not necessarily be ignored. Whilea protest without copies of documents will notnecessarily be ignored, the submission of suchdocuments with the protest will obviously expediteconsideration of the documents, which considerationmight not otherwise occur. Further, some documentswhich are available to protestor may not be otherwiseavailable to the Office.

Every effort should be made by a protestor to servea copy of the protest upon the attorney or agent ofrecord or upon the applicant if no attorney or agentis of record. Of course, the copy served uponapplicant or upon applicant’s attorney or agentshould be a complete copy including a copy of eachprior art or other document relied on in the samemanner as required by 37 CFR 1.291(c)(3) for theOffice copy. The protest filed in the Office shouldreflect, by an appropriate “Certificate of Service,”that service has been made as provided in 37 CFR1.291( b). Only in those instances where service isnot possible should the protest be filed in duplicatein order that the Office can attempt service.

1901.04 When Should the Protest BeSubmitted [R-08.2012]

Except where a protest is accompanied by the writtenconsent of the applicant as provided in 37 CFR1.291(b)(1), a protest under 37 CFR 1.291(a) mustbe submitted prior to the date the application waspublished under 37 CFR 1.211 or the mailing of anotice of allowance under 37 CFR 1.311, whicheveroccurs first, and the application must be pendingwhen the protest and application file are broughtbefore the examiner in order to be ensured ofconsideration. As a practical matter, any protestshould be submitted as soon as possible after theprotestor becomes aware of the existence of theapplication to which the protest is to be directed. Bysubmitting a protest early in the examination process,i.e., before the Office acts on the application ifpossible, the protestor ensures that the protest will

receive maximum consideration and will be of themost benefit to the Office in its examination of theapplication. A protest submitted after the mailing ofthe notice of allowance will not knowingly beignored if the protest includes prior art documentswhich clearly anticipate or clearly render obviousone or more claims. However, the likelihood ofconsideration of a protest decreases as the patentdate approaches.

A protest filed after final rejection and complyingwith all the requirements of 37 CFR 1.291 will beconsidered if the application is still pending whenthe protest and application are provided to theexaminer. However, prosecution will not ordinarilybe reopened after final rejection if the prior art citedin the protest is merely cumulative of the prior artcited in the final rejection.

A protest filed in a reissue application is not a “formof preissuance opposition to the grant of a patent”since the patent to be reissued has already beengranted. Thus, a protest may be filed in a reissueapplication throughout the pendency of the reissueapplication prior to the date of mailing of a noticeof allowance subject to the timing constraint of theexamination. A protest with regard to a reissueapplication should, however, be filed within the2-month period following announcement of the filingof the reissue application in the Official Gazette. See MPEP § 1441.01. If, for some reason, the protestof the reissue application cannot be filed within the2-month period provided by MPEP § 1441, theprotest can be submitted at a later time, but theprotestor must be aware that reissue applications are“special” and a later filed protest may be receivedafter action by the examiner. Any request by aprotestor in a reissue application for an extension ofthe 2-month period following the announcement inthe Official Gazette , and a delay of the examinationuntil the extended period expires, will be consideredonly if filed in the form of a petition under 37 CFR1.182 and accompanied by the petition fee set forthin 37 CFR 1.17( f). The petition under 37 CFR 1.182and the petition fee must be filed prior to theexpiration of the 2-month period provided by MPEP§ 1441. The petition must explain why the additionaltime is necessary and the nature of the protestintended. A copy of such petition must be servedupon applicant in accordance with 37 CFR 1.248.

1900-6March 2014

MANUAL OF PATENT EXAMINING PROCEDURE§ 1901.04

The petition should be directed to the appropriateTechnology Center (TC) which will forward thepetition to the Office of Patent Legal Administrationfor decision. Any such petition will be criticallyreviewed as to demonstrated need before beinggranted since the delay of examination of a reissueapplication of another party is being requested.Accordingly, the requests should be made onlywhere necessary, for the minimum period required,and with a justification establishing the necessity forthe extension.

Where a protest of a reissue application is submittedafter the 2-month period, no petition for entry of theprotest under 37 CFR 1.182 is needed with respectto the protest being submitted after the 2 months,unless a final rejection has been issued orprosecution on the merits has been closed for thereissue application. See MPEP § 1441.01. Insituations where a final rejection has been issued, orprosecution on the merits has been otherwise closed,a petition under 37 CFR 1.182 along with the petitionfee under 37 CFR 1.17(f) must be submitted withthe protest. The petition must include an explanationas to why the additional time was necessary andidentify the nature of the protest submitted. A copyof the petition must be served upon the applicant inaccordance with 37 CFR 1.248. The petition shouldbe directed to the Office of Petitions.

If the protest is a “REISSUE LITIGATION” protest,it is particularly important that it be filed early ifprotestor wishes it considered at the time the Officefirst acts on the application. Protestors should beaware that the Office will entertain petitions fromreissue applicants under 37 CFR 1.182 to waive the2-month delay period of MPEP § 1441 in appropriatecircumstances. Accordingly, protestors to reissueapplications cannot automatically assume that thefull 2-month delay period of MPEP § 1441 willalways be available.

1901.05 Initial Office Handling andAcknowledgment of Protest [R-08.2012]

I. PROTESTS REFERRED TO EXAMINER

Protests filed against pending applications will bereferred to the examiner having charge of theapplication involved. 37 CFR 1.291(a). A protest

specifically identifying the application to which itis directed will be entered in the application file, if(A) the protest is accompanied by a written consentof the applicant or is submitted prior to thepublication of the application under 37 CFR 1.211or the mailing of a notice of allowance under 37 CFR1.311, whichever occurs first, (see MPEP § 1901.04),(B) a copy of the protest has been served onapplicant in accordance with 37 CFR 1.248, or aduplicate copy is filed with the Office in the eventservice is not possible , and (C) the protest complieswith the content requirements of 37 CFR 1.291(c).37 CFR 1.291( b).

A protest where the application is specificallyidentified, which is submitted in conformance with37 CFR 1.291(a) , (b), and (c), will be consideredby the Office if the protest is matched with theapplication in time to permit review by the examinerduring prosecution.

II. PROTEST DOES NOT INDICATE SERVICE

If the protest filed in the Office does not, however,indicate service on applicant or applicant’s attorneyor agent, and is not filed in duplicate, then the Officemay undertake to determine whether or not servicehas been made by contacting applicant or applicant’sattorney or agent by telephone or in writing toascertain if service has been made. If service has notbeen made and no duplicate has been filed, then theOffice may request protestor to file such a duplicatebefore the protest is referred to the examiner.Alternatively, if the protest involves only a fewpages, the Office may, in its sole discretion, elect toreproduce the protest rather than delay referring itto the examiner. If duplicate protest papers aremailed to applicant or applicant’s attorney or agentby the Office, the application file should reflect thatfact, either by a letter transmitting the protest or, ifno transmittal letter is used, simply by an appropriatenotation in the “Contents” section of the applicationfile history.

III. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PROTEST

A protestor in an original or reissue application willnot receive any communications from the Officerelating to the protest, or to the application, otherthan the return of a self-addressed postcard which

March 20141900-7

§ 1901.05PROTEST

protestor may include with the protest in order toreceive an acknowledgment that the protest has beenreceived by the Office. 37 CFR 1.291( d). Where aself-addressed postcard is included with the protest,the Office will acknowledge a protest by return ofthe self-addressed postcard prior to the protest’sentry into the application file or return to theprotestor, as appropriate. Thus, it is to be noted thatthe receipt of the self-addressed postcard from theOffice is not an indication that the protest complieswith 37 CFR 1.291.

IV. APPLICATIONS AND STATUS THEREOFMAINTAINED IN CONFIDENCE

The postcard acknowledging receipt of a protest inother than a reissue application will not and mustnot indicate whether such application in fact existsor the status of any such application. Officeemployees must exercise care to ensure that mattersrelating to applications are not discussed withprotestor or communicated in writing to protestor.Original applications are, of course, required by 35U.S.C. 122 to be kept in confidence unless publishedpursuant to 35 U.S.C. 122(b) or are available to thepublic pursuant to 37 CFR 1.14(a)(1)(iv), (v), or (vi).Thus, unless a protestor has been granted access toan original application, the protestor is not entitledto obtain from the Office any information concerningthe same, including the mere fact that such anapplication exists. Petitions for access to patentapplications with the exception of applicationsinvolved in or related to a proceeding before theBoard of Patent Appeals or Interferences are decidedby the Office of Petitions pursuant to delegationcontained in MPEP § 1002.02(b). Reissueapplications filed on, or after, March 1, 1977 arepursuant to 37 CFR 1.11(b) “open to inspection bythe public.” After an application is publishedpursuant to 35 U.S.C. 122(b), the application filecontents become available to the public over theInternet through the Office’s public PatentApplication Information Retrieval (PAIR) website.In addition, a copy of the file content of thepublished application may be requested by filing awritten request under 37 CFR 1.14(a)(1) includingthe fee as set forth in 37 CFR 1.19(b).

The Office will communicate with the applicantregarding any protest entered in an application file

and may require the applicant to supply informationpursuant to 37 CFR 1.291( f), including replies tospecific questions raised by the protest, in order forthe Office to decide any issues raised thereby. Under37 CFR 1.291(f), the examiner can require theapplicant to reply to the protest and answer specificquestions raised by the protest.

1901.06 Examiner Treatment of Protest[R-08.2012]

Office practice as defined in 37 CFR 1.291(a) givesrecognition to the value of the written protests inavoiding the issuance of invalid patents. However,the fact that one or more protests has been filed inan application, whether the application is an originalapplication or a reissue application, does not relievethe examiner from conducting a normal examinationon the merits, including the required search.Evidence submitted in a protest will be consideredon the same basis as other ex parte evidence. In reReuter, 651 F.2d 751, 758, 210 USPQ 249, 255(CCPA 1981).

I. INITIAL REVIEW

An examiner initially receiving a protest willimmediately review the same for the following:

(A) To ensure that either the protest or theapplication file indicates that a copy of the protesthas been served on applicant or applicant’s attorneyor agent. If a copy is not indicated as having beenserved on applicant or applicant’s attorney and isnot filed in duplicate, then the examiner shouldundertake to determine whether or not service hasbeen made by contacting applicant or applicant’sattorney or agent, but not the protestor. If it has, thisshould be noted on the protest or on the applicationfile. If service has not been made, the protest andapplication file should be brought to the attention ofthe TC Director for appropriate action. See MPEP§ 1901.05.

(B) A protest raising issues of “fraud,”“inequitable conduct,” or “violation of duty ofdisclosure” will be entered in the application file,generally without comments on those issues.

If a protest is filed in a reissue application and thereissue application is related to a patent involved in

1900-8March 2014

MANUAL OF PATENT EXAMINING PROCEDURE§ 1901.06

a pending interference proceeding, such applicationshould be referred to the Office of Patent LegalAdministration before considering the protest andacting on the applications.

II. PERIOD FOR COMMENTS BY APPLICANT

If the primary examiner’s initial review reveals thatthe protest is ready for consideration during theexamination, the examiner may nevertheless considerit desirable, or necessary, to obtain applicant’scomments on the protest before further action. Insuch situations, the examiner will offer applicant anopportunity to file comments within a set period,usually 1 month, unless circumstances warrant alonger period.

Form paragraph 19.01 can be used to offer applicantan opportunity to file comments on the protest.

¶ 19.01 Period for Comments on Protest by Applicant

A protest against issuance of a patent based upon this applicationhas been filed under 37 CFR 1.291(a) on [1], and a copy [2].Any comments or reply applicant desires to file beforeconsideration of the protest must be filed by [3].

Examiner Note:

1. Applicant is normally given one month to submit anycomments, unless circumstances in the case would warrant alonger period.

2. A copy of this Office action is NOT sent to the protestor.See 37 CFR 1.291(d).

3. In bracket 2, insert either-- has been served on applicant--or-- is attached hereto--.

Where necessary or desirable to decide questionsraised by the protest, under 37 CFR 1.291( f) theprimary examiner can require the applicant to replyto the protest and answer specific questions raisedby the protest. The primary examiner cannot requirea reply to questions relating to “fraud,” “inequitableconduct,” or “violation of the duty of disclosure”since those issues are generally not commented onby the Office. Any questions directed to applicantby the primary examiner must be limited to seekinganswers reasonably necessary in order for theprimary examiner to decide questions raised by theprotest and which are before the primary examinerfor decision. The primary examiner is not permitted,under 37 CFR 1.291( f), to seek answers to questionswhich are not before the primary examiner for

decision. The primary examiner must use care inrequiring information from applicant pursuant to 37CFR 1.291(f) to ensure that the required informationis necessary to the decision to be made.

Form paragraph 19.02 can be used to requireadditional information from applicant regardingissues raised by the protest.

¶ 19.02 Requirement for Information

The protest under 37 CFR 1.291 filed on [1] has been considered.In order to reach a full and proper consideration of the issuesraised therein, it is necessary to obtain additional informationfrom applicant regarding these issues. In particular [2]. Thefailure to reply to this requirement for information within TWOMONTHS of the mailing date of this requirement will result inabandonment of the application. This time period may beextended under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136.

Examiner Note:

While the examiner normally should not need furtherinformation from applicant, this form paragraph may be usedto request specific additional information from the applicant.

III. PROTESTOR NOT PERMITTED TO COMPLETEINCOMPLETE PROTEST

A protestor may not complete an incomplete protest,nor further participate in, or inquire as to the statusof, any Office proceedings relating to the initialprotest. 37 CFR 1.291. The examiner must not,therefore, communicate with protestor in any wayand will not consider a later submission by protestor,unless such submission complies with 37 CFR1.291(c)(5) (see MPEP § 1901.07). Improper protestswill be returned to the protestor, or discarded, at theoption of the Office. 37 CFR 1.291(g).

IV. TREATMENT OF TIMELY SUBMITTEDPROTEST

If the protest has been timely submitted and isentered into the record of the application in time topermit review by the examiner during prosecution,the examiner must consider (A) each of the prior artor other documents submitted in conformance with37 CFR 1.291(c) and any discussion of suchdocuments in the protest, and (B) any non-prior artissue(s) raised by the protest, and the informationsupplied as to same. If the protest has been timelysubmitted in accordance with 37 CFR 1.291(b) butis not timely matched with the application to permit

March 20141900-9

§ 1901.06PROTEST

review by the examiner during prosecution, due toinadequate identification, the protest may be returnedto the protestor where practical, or if return is notpractical, discarded. 37 CFR 1.291(a).

At least those prior art documents which theexaminer relies on in rejecting claims will be madeof record by means of form PTO-892, unless theprotestor has listed such prior art or other documentson form PTO/SB/08A and 08B (or an acceptablesubstitute as provided by MPEP § 609.04(a)), inwhich case the examiner will place the examiner’sinitials adjacent to the citations in the boxes providedon the form PTO/SB/08A and 08B (see MPEP §609.04(a)). Where the prior art or other documentshave not been cited on a PTO-892, or listed andinitialed on a PTO/SB/08A and 08B, the examinerwill place a notation in the protest paper adjacent tothe reference to the documents. The notation shouldinclude the examiner’s initials and the term“checked.” The examiner will also indicate in thenext Office action that all documents submitted havebeen considered.

It is not intended that the examiner be overlytechnical in construing 37 CFR 1.291( c) and refuseconsideration of a protest because it does not includeall of the contents enumerated by 37 CFR 1.291( c).The examiner should consider the protest to theextent it is helpful even though one or more of thelisted items is omitted.

Where prior art or other documents are consideredby the examiner, even though not submitted in fullconformance with 37 CFR 1.291( c), the examinermust , for all those documents considered but notlisted on the form PTO-892, (A) mark “checked”and place the examiner’s initials beside each citation,or (B) where all the documents cited on a given pagehave been considered, mark “All checked” and placethe examiner’s initials in the left-hand margin besidethe citations. See MPEP § 609.04(a). Where priorart or other documents are listed by the protestor onform PTO/SB/08A and 08B, even though notsubmitted in full conformance with 37 CFR 1.291(c), the examiner must , for all those documentsconsidered, place the examiner’s initials adjacent tothe citations in the boxes provided on the formPTO/SB/08A and 08B. Where the prior art or otherdocuments are listed by the protestor on form

PTO/SB/08A and 08B, but are not submitted in fullcompliance with 37 CFR 1.291( c), the examinermust , for all those documents not considered, drawa line through the citation on the form PTO/SB/08Aand 08B. See MPEP § 609.05(a). If a protest enteredin an application file complies with 37 CFR 1.291(c), the examiner is required to fully consider all theissues, except for any issues of “fraud,” “inequitableconduct,” or “duty of disclosure” raised by theprotestor, and clearly state the examiner’s positionthereon in detail. 37 CFR 1.291(e).

V. PROTEST FILED AFTER ALLOWANCE OR THEPUBLICATION OF THE APPLICATION

A.Without the Written Consent of Applicant

If the protest is submitted after the publication ofthe application under 37 CFR 1.211 or the mailingof a notice of allowance under 37 CFR 1.311,whichever occurs first, and is not accompanied bythe written consent of the applicant, it should not beentered in the application file. The applicant shouldbe notified that the protest is untimely and that it isnot being entered in the application file. Thehandling of the protest will vary depending on theparticular situation as follows.

1. Service of Copy Included

Where the protest includes an indication of serviceof copy on the applicant, the original protest shouldbe discarded.

2. Service of Copy Not Included

Where the protest does not include an indication ofservice, the duplicate copy of the protest (if present)should be discarded and the original protest papersshould be sent to the applicant along with thenotification of nonentry.

B.With the Written Consent of Applicant

37 CFR 1.291(b)(1) provides that a protest may befiled at any time if it is accompanied by the writtenconsent of the applicant to the filing of the protestbeing submitted as it specifically excludes thetimeliness requirements of 37 CFR 1.291(b). While37 CFR 1.291(b)(1) ensures that any (adequately

1900-10March 2014

MANUAL OF PATENT EXAMINING PROCEDURE§ 1901.06

identified) protest filed with the written consent ofthe applicant will be entered into the record of theintended application (if there is also compliance with37 CFR 1.291(c)), 37 CFR 1.291(b)(1) makes clearthat the protest must be matched with the intendedapplication during prosecution to ensureconsideration by the examiner. For example, wherethe protest is submitted close to publication of thepatent, it is doubtful that the examiner would havetime to review the protest, although the protest wouldbe made of record. Even if not timely matched withthe intended application, the examiner may stilldecide to consider the protest should there besufficient time to do so.

35 U.S.C. 122(c) permits the filing of a protest in anapplication after the application has been publishedif there is express written consent of the applicant.In order to file protests after publication of patentapplications, 37 CFR 1.291(b)(1) requires that theprotest after publication of an application beaccompanied by the written consent of the applicant.The written consent should indicate that applicantis consenting to the specific protest being submitted.Applicant may choose to provide a blanket consentto: any protests filed; protests filed by a particularreal party in interest; a single protest by a particularparty in interest (e.g., a protest that party Smith hasinformed me that he will be submitting during the

week of November 26th); a protest involving aparticular item of prior art; or a particular protestthat has been reviewed and applicant is willing tohave considered by the Office. Where applicantconsents to a protest, the Office will abide by theterms of the consent, and will enter the protest onlyif (A) the protest submitted is within the scope ofthe consent, and (B) the protest complies with therequirements of 37 CFR 1.291(b) (other than thetimeliness requirement) and (c). If a properlyconsented to protest does not comply with some ofthe requirements of 37 CFR 1.291(b) or (c), theOffice may choose to consider a piece of prior artpermitted under the terms of the consent.

VI. COPIES OF DOCUMENTS NOT SUBMITTED

If the protest is not accompanied by a copy of eachprior art or other document relied on as required by37 CFR 1.291( c), the examiner will consider thedocuments submitted. The protestor cannot be

assured that the examiner will consider the missingdocument(s). However, if the examiner does so, theexaminer will either cite the document on formPTO-892 or place a notation in the protest paperadjacent to the reference to the document which willinclude the examiner’s initials and the term“checked.” If the examiner considered a documentnot submitted, the next Office action will so indicate.

VII. CONSIDERATION OF PROTESTOR’SARGUMENTS

In view of the value of written protests, the examinermust give careful consideration to the points andarguments made on behalf of the protestor. AnyOffice action by the examiner treating the merits ofa timely submitted protest complying with 37 CFR1.291(c) must specifically consider and make evidentby detailed reasoning the examiner’s position as tothe major arguments and points raised by theprotestor. While it is not necessary for the examinerto respond to each and every minute argument orpoint, the major arguments and points must bespecifically covered. The examiner will not, underany circumstances, treat or discuss those argumentsor points directed to “fraud,” “inequitable conduct,”or “violation of duty of disclosure.” 37 CFR1.291(e).

VIII. RESULTS OF CONSIDERATION REPORTEDTO TECHNOLOGY CENTER (TC) DIRECTOR

After the examiner has considered the protest, theexaminer will report the results of such considerationto the TC Director.

1901.07 Protestor Participation [R-08.2012]

37 CFR 1.291 does not permit protestor, or any othermember of the public, to contact or receiveinformation from the Office as to the disposition orstatus of the protest, or the application to which it isdirected, or to participate in any Office proceedingsrelating to the protest. The Office does not servecopies of Office actions or other documents mailedby the Office on protestors, and does not requireapplicants to serve copies of papers filed with theOffice on protestors. Furthermore, a protestor is notpermitted to participate in interviews, appeal adecision by the examiner adverse to the protestor to

March 20141900-11

§ 1901.07PROTEST

the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, orparticipate in an appeal by applicant. The dispositionof the protest will be an ex parte matter betweenthe Office and the applicant. Where protestor hasaccess to an application, for example, a reissueapplication which is open to the public and may beinspected under 37 CFR 1.11, the proceedings maythereby be monitored.

Under 37 CFR 1.291( f), applicant may be requiredby the Office to reply to a protest. Any reply theretowould be ex parte and would not be served on theprotestor.

1901.07(a) Filing of Multiple Papers Relatingto Same Issues [R-08.2012]

Under 37 CFR 1.291( d), protestor participation endswith the filing of the initial protest, and protestorwill not be allowed to complete any protest that isincomplete. Effective November 22, 2004, 37 CFR1.291(c) was amended to no longer permit thesubmission of additional (cumulative) prior art bythe same real party in interest. Multiple piecemealprotests (raising a slightly different issue in eachprotest submission) in a single application by thesame real party in interest are not permitted. Afterthe filing of the initial protest, no further submissionof prior art by the same real party in interest will beconsidered, except for new, non-cumulative priorart submitted under the conditions of 37 CFR1.291(c)(5). 37 CFR 1.291(c)(5) requires that asecond or subsequent protest by the same real partyin interest include:

(A) an explanation as to why the issue(s) raisedin the second or subsequent protest are significantlydifferent than those raised earlier;

(B) an explanation as to why the significantlydifferent issue(s) were not earlier presented; and

(C) the processing fee under 37 CFR 1.17(i).

Significantly different issue(s) may be raised by thesubmission of new, non-cumulative prior art or otherinformation not previously made of record.Additional comments seeking to bring in further oreven new data or information with respect to an issuepreviously raised by the same real party in interestwould not qualify as a significantly different issue.By imposing requirements for second or subsequent

protests on “the same real party in interest,” therequirements of 37 CFR 1.291(c)(5) cannot beavoided by multiple protests submitted by differentpeople representing the same real party in interest.

Second or subsequent protest by the same real partyin interest that do not comply with 37 CFR1.291(c)(5) will not be entered in the intendedapplication and will be returned to the protestor, ordiscarded, at the option of the Office. 37 CFR1.291(g).

An examiner will consider a second or subsequentprotest filed on behalf of the same real party ininterest (subject to the time frames set forth in 37CFR 1.291(b), the caveat that the protest can betimely matched and considered prior to the issuanceof the patent, and the content requirements of 37CFR 1.291(c)(1) to (4)), if the second or subsequentprotest complies with 37 CFR 1.291(c)(5).

1902-1905 [Reserved]

1906 Supervisory Review of an Examiner’sDecision Adverse to Protestor [R-08.2012]

As pointed out in MPEP § 1901.07, a protestorcannot appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals andInterferences from an adverse decision of theexaminer. Further, a decision by the examineradverse to a protestor is final, and under therestricted protestor participation permitted under 37CFR 1.291( d) is not petitionable to the Director.

1907 Unauthorized Participation byProtestor [R-08.2012]

Office personnel must exercise care to ensure thatsubstantive matters relating to the application arenot discussed ex parte with protestor orcommunicated in writing ex parte to protestor. Theexaminer must not communicate in any manner withprotestor. See 37 CFR 1.291( d).

1900-12March 2014

MANUAL OF PATENT EXAMINING PROCEDURE§ 1901.07(a)

1908-1919 [Reserved]

1920 Citation of Prior Art Under 37 CFR1.501(a) [R-08.2012]

37 CFR 1.501(a) permits any person at any timeduring the period of enforceability of a patent to citeto the Office, in writing, prior art consisting of patentand printed publications which that person states tobe pertinent and applicable to the patent and believesto have a bearing on the patentability of any claim(s)of the patent. See MPEP § 2202 - § 2208.

March 20141900-13

§ 1920PROTEST