Chelsea Scoreboard Presentation

7/29/2019 Chelsea Scoreboard Presentation

1/26

AccountabilityScorecard

Presentation

Chelsea School District Board MeetingSeptember 9, 2013


2/26

District/School Accountability History

Pre-2001 School accountability looked at overall proficiency rates in Reading

and Mathematics

2001 No Child Left Behind Legislation was passed Schools continue to be held accountable for overall proficiency rates

in Reading and Mathematics Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)was introduced which added

State level proficiency rates and increases to 100% proficient for allstudents

Student group proficiency rates were also introduced into theaccountability system.

2013

State Waiver adopted by Federal Government New Scorecard introduced Overall and student groups continued School AMOs introduced

Added bottom 30% of students as a new student group Writing, Science and Social Studies scores added


3/26

New Accountability System

Adoption of the states new waiver to theElementary Secondary Education Act (NoChild Left Behind 2001)

Schools and districts are expected to have85% of all students and student groupsproficient on state assessment by 2021-2022

Student groups are defined as any group of 30or more students who share economic, ethnic,limited English proficient, students withdisabilities, or other characteristics.


4/26

New Accountability System

Schools and districts have been assigned by thestate an individual yearly Annual MeasureableObjective (AMO)

This objective replaces an annual statewidetarget of achievement for all schools anddistricts

AMO was calculated using the proficiency rate

from the 2011-2012 school year to createannual targets that increment to an endproficiency rate of 85% by 2021-2022


5/26

The Michigan Department of Education has now developed a five

color system for districts and schools called Accountability

Scorecards


6/26

Accountability Scorecard Components

The system is partially a point based system

Each school or district earns an overallproficiency percentage which corresponds to

one of the colors in the five color system

The colors can change based upon

Student participation/proficiency on state

assessments Educator Evaluation (Effectiveness Labels and Teacher Student Data Link)

Compliance Factors (School Improvement Plan and School PerformanceIndicators Report)

Student attendance/graduation rates


7/26

Accountability Scorecard

Components

Proficiency, participation

and student groups havethe most impact on the

overall color.


8/26

4%0%

66%

9%

21%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

GREEN LIME YELLOW ORANGE RED

Districts*Source: "2012-13 District and School AccountabilityMaster Designations File," where building code was

00000.


3%0%

77%

5%

15%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Schools*Source: "2012-13 District and School AccountabilityMaster Designations File," where building code was

00000



9/26

Accountability Scorecards

This is due to the number of additional factors

that prevent a school from receiving a Green orLime designation

As a common example, if a single studentgroup is not on track to reach 85 percent

proficiency or did not test over 95 percent ofthe population, then that one single subset ofstudents will prevent a school or district fromreceiving a color higher than yellow.

Yellow scorecards are extremely commonSTATEWIDE


10/26

Significant Changes

to the New System1. The new bottom 30% student group forproficiency. This group is held to the sameAMO as all students

2. Audit checks (which can significantly affect thefinal color see next slide)

3. Achievement and participation of small groupsof students often impact the overall color

4. Some schools and districts may have highoverall achievement on stateassessments but this may not beapparent in the color designation in the

accountability system


11/26

10%

62%

18%

5% 6%

Green Lime Yellow Orange Red

BEFORE AuditChecks

2%0%

76%

6%

16%

Green Lime Yellow Orange Red

AFTER AuditChecks

2012-13 Statewide Scorecards*Excludes educational entities that do not have proficiency points


12/26


13/26

Overall Proficiency Percentage and Color for the

Chelsea School District and individual Schools

Proficiency

Percent

Proficiency

Percent ColorDesignation

Overall

ScorecardColor

If the overall color changed,

WHY?

Chelsea

School

District

71.6% LIME ORANGEMore than 2 red cells for

subgroup (Bottom 30%)

Chelsea

High School71.4% LIME ORANGE

More than 2 red cells forsubgroup (Bottom 30%) &

Graduation Rate

Beach

Middle71.7% LIME YELLOW

At least one red cell for


SouthMeadows

Elementary

71.7% LIME YELLOWAt least one red cell for


North

Creek

Elementary

87.5% GREEN YELLOWAt least one red cell for



14/26


15/26


16/26


17/26


18/26


19/26


20/26

Moving Forward

Proficiency Targets and REDareas are being used to develop

building and district goals


21/26

BuildingName

ContentArea

Annual

Incre-

ment

11-12

Base

Target

12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22

Chelsea

High

School

Math 2.65 58.53 61.18 63.82 66.47 69.12 71.77 74.41 77.06 79.71 82.35 85.00

Chelsea

High

School

Reading 0.71 77.88 78.59 79.30 80.02 80.73 81.44 82.15 82.86 83.58 84.29 85.00

Chelsea

High

School

Science 3.48 50.23 53.71 57.18 60.66 64.14 67.62 71.09 74.57 78.05 81.52 85.00

Chelsea

High

School

Social

Studies2.58 59.24 61.82 64.39 66.97 69.54 72.12 74.70 77.27 79.85 82.42 85.00

Chelsea

High

School

Writing 1.99 65.14 67.13 69.11 71.10 73.08 75.07 77.06 79.04 81.03 83.01 85.00

CHELSEA HIGH SCHOOL Proficiency Targets


22/26

Beach

Middle

School

Math 2.61 58.91 61.52 64.13 66.74 69.35 71.96 74.56 77.17 79.78 82.39 85.00

Beach

Middle

School

Reading 0.72 77.78 78.50 79.22 79.95 80.67 81.39 82.11 82.83 83.56 84.28 85.00

Beach

Middle

School

Science 4.86 36.36 41.22 46.09 50.95 55.82 60.68 65.54 70.41 75.27 80.14 85.00

Beach

Middle

School

Social

Studies3.53 49.75 53.28 56.80 60.33 63.85 67.38 70.90 74.43 77.95 81.48 85.00

Beach

Middle

School

Writing 2.92 55.85 58.77 61.68 64.60 67.51 70.43 73.34 76.26 79.17 82.09 85.00

BEACH MIDDLE SCHOOL Proficiency Targets


23/26

BuildingName

ContentArea

Annual

Incre-

ment

11-12

Base

Target

12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22

South

Meadows

Elementary

Math 2.42 60.82 63.24 65.66 68.07 70.49 72.91 75.33 77.75 80.16 82.58 85.00

South

Meadows

Elementary

Reading 0.61 78.92 79.53 80.14 80.74 81.35 81.96 82.57 83.18 83.78 84.39 85.00

South

Meadows

Elementary

Science 6.46 20.41 26.87 33.33 39.79 46.25 52.71 59.16 65.62 72.08 78.54 85.00

South

Meadows

Elementary

Social

Studies4.14 43.65 47.79 51.92 56.06 60.19 64.33 68.46 72.60 76.73 80.87 85.00

South

Meadows

Elementary

Writing 3.53 49.68 53.21 56.74 60.28 63.81 67.34 70.87 74.40 77.94 81.47 85.00

SOUTH MEADOWS ELEMENTARYProficiency Targets


24/26

BuildingName

ContentArea

Annual

Incre-

ment

11-12

Base

Target

12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22

North

CreekElementary

Math 2.58 59.24 61.82 64.39 66.97 69.54 72.12 74.70 77.27 79.85 82.42 85.00

North

CreekElementary

Reading 0.54 79.62 80.16 80.70 81.23 81.77 82.31 82.85 83.39 83.92 84.46 85.00

NORTH CREEK ELEMENTARYProficiency Targets


25/26

BuildingName

ContentArea

Annual

Incre-

ment

11-12

Base

Target

12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22

Chelsea

School

District

Math 2.53 59.68 62.21 64.74 67.28 69.81 72.34 74.87 77.40 79.94 82.47 85.00

Chelsea

School

District

Reading 0.65 78.49 79.14 79.79 80.44 81.09 81.75 82.40 83.05 83.70 84.35 85.00

Chelsea

School

District

Science 4.87 36.26 41.13 46.01 50.88 55.76 60.63 65.50 70.38 75.25 80.13 85.00

Chelsea

School

District

Social

Studies3.37 51.27 54.64 58.02 61.39 64.76 68.14 71.51 74.88 78.25 81.63 85.00

Chelsea

School

District

Writing 2.73 57.73 60.46 63.18 65.91 68.64 71.37 74.09 76.82 79.55 82.27 85.00

CHELSEA SCHOOL DISTRICT Proficiency Targets


26/26

Thank you!

Questions/Comments?

Documents

Chelsea Scoreboard Presentation