Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Civil War-era laws kept 6.1 million fromvoting in the 2016 election
Confederate General Robert E. Lee (right) shakes hands with Union General Ulysses S. Grant as Lee surrenders his
army at Appomattox Court House in Virginia, effectively ending the Civil War, 1865. Photo: Reproduction of a painting by
Thomas Nast
Republican Donald Trump was chosen as the next president on November 8, 2016, during
an election in which millions of people were prevented from voting by rules that date back
to the Civil War. These rules were made to maintain white male political control.
Slim Margins
About 6.1 million people who were convicted of breaking laws could not cast ballots
because of policies that keep felons off voter rolls, according to justice reform organization
The Sentencing Project. And according to the most recent numbers from Florida,
Wisconsin and Michigan, which is still counting, Hillary Clinton lost by a number of votes
smaller than the number of those banned from voting. Many of those banned are poor or
black or both, which are groups that tend to vote Democrat.
At the same time, Clinton garnered at least a million more votes than Trump, and she
stands to gain even more as the counting continues, but lost the Electoral College. This
system gives each state a number of votes roughly proportioned to population. Each state
By PBS NewsHour, adapted by Newsela staff on 11.17.16
Word Count 1,039
This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. 1
chooses "electors" to cast each of the votes for their state. There are 538 electoral votes for
the country in total. The candidate who wins the majority of the electoral votes in the
country, which will be officially counted in January, wins the election.
It is unusual for the winner in a presidential election to win through the Electoral College,
but not also win the "popular vote" or majority of actual votes in the country. The last time
this happened was during the heavily contested presidential election in the year 2000
when Republican George W. Bush won the Electoral College, defeating Democrat Al Gore,
who won the popular vote.
The Historical Context
In 1787, James Madison introduced the Electoral College as an alternative to a popular
vote system because he wrongly thought black people in the South presented a “difficulty
… of a serious nature.” The population of the North contained higher numbers of white
men who could vote than the South did at the time. Even though enslaved blacks could not
vote, there were large numbers of them living in the South. Madison thought the Electoral
College, which gives votes to states relative to how many people live in a state, would
boost the political power of the slave-holding Southerners. It would make the states with
fewer people, which at the time were slave-holding states, more powerful. His Electoral
College plan included the idea that a black person would only be counted as three-fifths of
a person.
A constitutional scholar says that these historical laws may have helped elect Trump.
Trump has been praised by the Ku Klux Klan, a racist terrorist group in America. He
rejected their endorsement this month.
Juan Perea is a law professor at Loyola University Chicago. He recalled the history of
disenfranchising, or preventing certain types of people from voting. This kind of
disenfranchisement was fought for by several Southern states when they resisted the
abolition of slavery and formed the Confederacy, following the 1860 election of Abraham
Lincoln. Then came the Civil War.
As more than half a million soldiers and slaves died and the Confederacy lost, the U.S.
passed the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, formally abolishing slavery. There was
one catch, though. The formerly enslaved blacks could only be free if they had not
committed a crime.
A South Carolina constitutional convention chairman reminded his colleagues in 1868 that
they could “deprive every colored man of their right of citizenship” by making “the most
trivial offence a felony” in the state.
By 1869, 29 states had enacted disenfranchisement laws.
This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. 2
Methods Of Voter Suppression
Perea believes disenfranchisement, coupled with voter ID laws enacted after the Supreme
Court “gutted” the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and 15 states introduced new voting
restrictions this election, contributed to Clinton’s loss.
Trump supporters are primarily white. Historically, white people have felt threatened by
change, responding by creating laws and voting to maintain supremacy, Perea said.
“The election of Barack Obama and changing demographics pose a very direct threat to
these core founding values, held by many Americans,” Perea said. “The failure to
understand and acknowledge the deep history of American racism leads to
underestimation of its current existence and impact.”
According to The Sentencing Project, all but two states have disenfranchisement laws that
strip people convicted of felonies of rights. These rights include being able to run for
office, sit on a jury or vote.
The Florida Problem
In Florida, once a Confederate state that now has some of the strictest voting rights
policies, 1 in 4 black people are disenfranchised.
It also has the most disenfranchised voters — about 1.6 million, with one-third of them
black. It is a state where Clinton needed approximately 120,000 more votes to win its 29
electoral votes.
“These are disproportionately low-income people and that’s viewed as more Democratic in
general,” said Executive Director Marc Mauer of the Sentencing Project.
The question frustrates black Florida resident Desmond Meade, who lived on the streets
after serving time for aggravated battery and possession of a firearm.
Meade, the president of the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition told NewsHour Weekend,
“Americans from all walks of life believe in second chances.”
Florida is also the same state the controversial 2000 election was centered around, when
Gore lost the election. Researchers Christopher Uggen and Jeff Manza estimate that if
disenfranchised voters had been able to vote, they could have overwhelmingly swung the
state to vote for Gore.
The Sentencing Project has estimated that the number of people affected by these laws
has grown from 1.1 million in 1976, to approximately 2.5 percent of the country’s voting-
age populace today. Mauer said 23 states have enacted some kind of reform.
This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. 3
There has been a movement for a National Popular Vote Interstate Compact that has
gained support since Gore lost in 2000. New York overwhelmingly agreed in 2014 to join
nine other Democratic states and Washington, D.C. Together, they have 165 electoral
votes. If they gain a total of 270 — the majority needed to elect a president — the nation
will move to a popular vote.
Perea said that no one cared about the felons. "The only reason liberals might care now is
because they lost," he said.
This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. 4
Quiz
1 Which idea is BEST supported by this paragraph from the article?
Florida is also the same state the controversial 2000 election was
centered around, when Gore lost the election. Researchers
Christopher Uggen and Jeff Manza estimate that if disenfranchised
voters had been able to vote, they could have overwhelmingly swung
the state to vote for Gore.
(A) Votes were improperly counted during the 2000 election that gave the state
to George W. Bush.
(B) State laws that disenfranchise voters are having a direct effect on national
elections in the U.S.
(C) It is unlikely that disenfranchised voters would make a difference in elections
if the laws were changed.
(D) Many more people living in Florida are disenfranchised than are legally able
to vote.
2 All of the following selections support the author's claim that without disenfranchisement laws
the results of the 2016 election might have been different.
Which piece of evidence is the STRONGEST one to support that claim?
(A) And according to the most recent numbers from Florida, Wisconsin and
Michigan, which is still counting, Hillary Clinton lost by a number of votes
smaller than the number of those banned from voting.
(B) It is unusual for the winner in a presidential election to win through the
Electoral College, but not also win the "popular vote" or majority of actual
votes in the country.
(C) Perea believes disenfranchisement, coupled with voter ID laws enacted after
the Supreme Court “gutted” the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and 15 states
introduced new voting restrictions this election, contributed to Clinton’s loss.
(D) In Florida, once a Confederate state that now has some of the strictest voting
rights policies, 1 in 4 black people are disenfranchised.
This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. 5
3 Which of these statements would be MOST important to include in an objective summary of the
article?
(A) The Electoral College unfairly divides voting power among the 50 states.
(B) Voters who are disenfranchised would definitely have voted for Clinton.
(C) The Electoral College was designed to give power to white voters in the
South.
(D) Voters were further stripped of their rights by a recent Supreme Court
decision.
4 Which of the following sentences from the article BEST develops a central idea?
(A) About 6.1 million people who were convicted of breaking laws could not cast
ballots because of policies that keep felons off voter rolls, according to
justice reform organization The Sentencing Project.
(B) At the same time, Clinton garnered at least a million more votes than Trump,
and she stands to gain even more as the counting continues, but lost the
Electoral College.
(C) Even though enslaved blacks could not vote, there were large numbers of
them living in the South.
(D) Meade, president of the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition, told the
NewsHour Weekend, “Americans from all walks of life believe in second
chances.”
This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. 6
Answer Key
1 Which idea is BEST supported by this paragraph from the article?
Florida is also the same state the controversial 2000 election was
centered around, when Gore lost the election. Researchers
Christopher Uggen and Jeff Manza estimate that if disenfranchised
voters had been able to vote, they could have overwhelmingly swung
the state to vote for Gore.
(A) Votes were improperly counted during the 2000 election that gave the state
to George W. Bush.
(B) State laws that disenfranchise voters are having a direct effect on
national elections in the U.S.
(C) It is unlikely that disenfranchised voters would make a difference in elections
if the laws were changed.
(D) Many more people living in Florida are disenfranchised than are legally able
to vote.
2 All of the following selections support the author's claim that without disenfranchisement laws
the results of the 2016 election might have been different.
Which piece of evidence is the STRONGEST one to support that claim?
(A) And according to the most recent numbers from Florida, Wisconsin and
Michigan, which is still counting, Hillary Clinton lost by a number of
votes smaller than the number of those banned from voting.
(B) It is unusual for the winner in a presidential election to win through the
Electoral College, but not also win the "popular vote" or majority of actual
votes in the country.
(C) Perea believes disenfranchisement, coupled with voter ID laws enacted after
the Supreme Court “gutted” the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and 15 states
introduced new voting restrictions this election, contributed to Clinton’s loss.
(D) In Florida, once a Confederate state that now has some of the strictest voting
rights policies, 1 in 4 black people are disenfranchised.
This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. 7
3 Which of these statements would be MOST important to include in an objective summary of the
article?
(A) The Electoral College unfairly divides voting power among the 50 states.
(B) Voters who are disenfranchised would definitely have voted for Clinton.
(C) The Electoral College was designed to give power to white voters in the
South.
(D) Voters were further stripped of their rights by a recent Supreme Court
decision.
4 Which of the following sentences from the article BEST develops a central idea?
(A) About 6.1 million people who were convicted of breaking laws could not
cast ballots because of policies that keep felons off voter rolls,
according to justice reform organization The Sentencing Project.
(B) At the same time, Clinton garnered at least a million more votes than Trump,
and she stands to gain even more as the counting continues, but lost the
Electoral College.
(C) Even though enslaved blacks could not vote, there were large numbers of
them living in the South.
(D) Meade, president of the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition, told the
NewsHour Weekend, “Americans from all walks of life believe in second
chances.”
This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. 8