Classroom-based Training Feedback

TECM 5180Dr. Lam

Needs AssessmentArea for Improvement:

Covered in: Resources Provided:

Not asking specific enough questions to complete problem, discrepancy, or innovation model

• Week 2• Piskurich Chapters

3 and 4

• Needs assessment document outline

• Three examples of needs assessments

• Annotated instructional design case study

DesignArea for Improvement: Covered in: Resources Provided:

Incomplete or no clear evidence of a task analysis

• Week 3 and Week 6• Smith and Ragan Ch. 5

• Design document specifications• Design document tutorial• Summary of learning types• Annotated Instructional Design

Case Study

Learning objectives only provided for first-level objectives

• Week 3 and Week 6• “Practical overview of learning

objectives”• “Revision of Bloom’s

Taxonomy”• Piskurich Ch. 5

See above

No clear assignment of learning types to each piece of the task analysis

• Week 3 and Week 6• Smith and Ragan Ch. 5

See above

Learning activities not clearly based on the learning type.

• Week 3 and Week 6• “Overview of Gagne’s theory of

learning”• “Rote vs. Meaningful Learning”• “Dick and Carey’s Instructional

Strategy”

See above

Events of learning not clearly represented or well-thought out

• Week 3 and Week 6• “Dick and Carey’s Instructional

Strategy”

See above

Course DeliverablesArea for Improvement:

Covered in: Resources Provided:

Participant’s guide didn’t promote enough interaction.

• Week 5• “Dick and Cary’s

Instructional Strategy”

• “Selecting instructional Media”

• Sample documents

Assessments weren’t always appropriate for learning type

• Week 6• “Assessment

instruments”• Piskurich pp. 159-

181

http://www.utexas.edu/academic/ctl/assessment/iar/students/plan/method/exams.php