12
Combining a thermally supported ground source heat pump with an ORC ASME ORC 2013 | Rotterdam | October 8, 2013 Stefan Schimpf, Roland Span Chair of Thermodynamics Faculty of Mechanical Engineering

Combining a thermally supported ground source heat …asme-orc2013.fyper.com/uploads/File/PPT 110.pdf · Schimpf | ASME ORC 2013 Rotterdam, October 8, 2013 2 Motivation Conventional

  • Upload
    lamtu

  • View
    227

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Combining a thermally supported ground source

heat pump with an ORC

ASME ORC 2013 | Rotterdam | October 8, 2013

Stefan Schimpf, Roland Span Chair of Thermodynamics

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering

2 Schimpf | ASME ORC 2013| Rotterdam, October 8, 2013

Motivation

Conventional solar systems - collector standstill whenever

the maximum temperature of the storage is reached

Approach:

• Combination of market proven technology

• Minimal additional investments

Goal:

• Selection of appropriate models

• Simulation and optimisation of the combined system

• Energetic and economic analysis

The resulting excess heat can be harnessed in an ORC!

3 Schimpf | ASME ORC 2013| Rotterdam, October 8, 2013

Combined solar system

Combined solar system

• Space heating

• Domestic hot water

Ground source heat pump

• Space heating

• Domestic hot water

ORC

• Scroll expander?

• pump

• valves

• advanced controls

Solar thermal loop

• Coiled tube

• Solar station

• Stratification device

4 Schimpf | ASME ORC 2013| Rotterdam, October 8, 2013

Overview of the System

Single family house

German low-energy standard

Floor space: 150 m²

Heating power: 5 kW

Borehole depth: 80 m

Evac. tube collector area: 10 m²

Storage tank volume: 900 l

5 Schimpf | ASME ORC 2013| Rotterdam, October 8, 2013

Software SH-PORT

Target group:

architects, heating installers

Inputs in Microsoft Excel, no

additional software required

Intuitive use, detailed

knowledge not necessary

Calculation by a dll written

in C++

State of the art modeling of

the components

Small number of predefined

systems

Fast calculation due to

multithreading

6 Schimpf | ASME ORC 2013| Rotterdam, October 8, 2013

Simulation results

Denver ORC conv.

ORC gain / kWh 112 -

Energy demand / kWh 1735 1849

savings (20 years) / € 333 -

• Electr. pricing Ankara: 14,7 ct/kWh

• Electr. pricing Denver: 8,9 ct/kWh

• Electr. pricing Bochum: 21,4 ct/kWh

• Inflation electricity: 5 %

Ankara ORC conv.

ORC gain / kWh 96 -

Energy demand / kWh 1444 1524

savings (20 years) / € 389 -

Bochum ORC conv.

ORC gain / kWh 37 -

Energy demand / kWh 2144 2164

savings (20 years) / € 142 -

The combined ORC-system is energetically superior

but under current conditions economically unfeasible!

7 Schimpf | ASME ORC 2013| Rotterdam, October 8, 2013

Modelling the ground heat exchanger

Soil λs, αs

Grout

λg, αg

U–tube

pipe 1

Fluid

Sp, Rf U–tube

pipe 2 Tf,

Tb

Tp, Rp

T0

Rb

ro

rb

Rs

injq

pq

bq

x

Eskilson (1987)

• Long-term response of a borehole

• Heat capacities inside the borehole are neglected,

model becomes valid after a few hours

• Representative for models in building energy analysis software

Relation between

heat extraction rate

and fluid temperature

8 Schimpf | ASME ORC 2013| Rotterdam, October 8, 2013

Analytical short timestep model

Soil λs, αs

Grout

λg, αg

Fluid

Sp, Rf

Tf,

T(r)

Tp

T0

re rb injq

pq

bq

Tb

2

0

·

f ,f 0nj0 i(1

· d)2

t t

t

t

G t t

T te

LqT

2

p

0

p

t

b s

1

11

1

p

L

Ct R

KR

K K

Javed and Claesson (2011): Simplifies geometry but considers

all parts of the borehole and thermal resistances.

9 Schimpf | ASME ORC 2013| Rotterdam, October 8, 2013

Simulation results – Comparison of GHX-models

Ankara JC ESK

Energy demand / kWh (conv.) 1524 1500

ORC gain / kWh 96 115

Energy demand / kWh (ORC) 1444 1402

savings (20 years) / € 389 476

Denver JC ESK

Energy demand / kWh (conv.) 1849 1817

ORC gain / kWh 112 135

Energy demand / kWh (ORC) 1735 1682

savings (20 years) / € 333 397

+22%

+19%

Long-term response models in state of the art

building energy analysis software are not suited

for ORCs coupled with ground heat exchangers!

10 Schimpf | ASME ORC 2013| Rotterdam, October 8, 2013

Javed and Claesson (2011): analytical short-time step model

simplifies geometry

Conclusion

• ORC-system saves energy but its economic feasibility is

questionable

• Comparison of two ground heat exchanger models

Eskilson (1987): long-term response

neglects heat capacities of fluid and grout

representative for building energy software

• Long-term response model overestimates ORC-gain

• Simulation of small-scale ORCs with condensation in a

ground heat exchanger requires a short-time step model

11 Schimpf | ASME ORC 2013| Rotterdam, October 8, 2013

12 Schimpf | ASME ORC 2013| Rotterdam, October 8, 2013

Influence of the regeneration caused by the ORC

Denver ORC

Extracted heat / kWh 5060

Injected heat/ kWh 2008

with ORC without ORC