35
COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Class 5 September 6, 2006

COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

  • Upload
    aldona

  • View
    55

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. Class 5 September 6, 2006. Milk comes in bags too!. A Heart Attack in a Bowl?=. Poutine. Thanks to Henry Ford. Not Used Often in the USA. Robertson screwdrivers. Canadian Tire Money. Loonies and Toonies. Tastes like soap. Thrills. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Class 5September 6, 2006

Page 2: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Milk comes in bags too!

Page 3: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

A Heart Attack in a Bowl?=

Page 4: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Poutine

Page 5: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Not Used Often in the USA• Thanks to Henry

Ford

Page 6: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Robertson screwdrivers

Page 7: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Canadian Tire Money

Page 8: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Loonies and Toonies

Page 9: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Thrills• Tastes like soap

Page 10: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Origins of Canadian Constitution

• Dominion of Canada

Page 11: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Constitution Act, 1867, 30 & 31 Victoria, c. 3.

• Formerly British North America Act• Preamble: Whereas the Provinces of

Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick have expressed their desire to be federated into One Dominion under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, with a Constitution similar in Principle to that of the United Kingdom

Page 12: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Dominion of Canada in 1867

Page 13: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Canada Today (10 provinces, 3 territories)

Page 14: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Patriation• What is patriation?

Page 15: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Patriation• Canada Act, 1982, • Constitution Act,

1982• VERY DIVISIVE

EVENT

Page 16: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Supremacy• (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme

law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

• (2) The Constitution of Canada includes • (a) the Canada Act, 1982, including this Act; (b)

the Acts and orders referred to in the Schedule; and

• (c) any amendment to any Act or order referred to in paragraph (a) or (b).

Page 17: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

COMPARE AND CONTRAST• U.S. Constitution • Canadian

Constitution

Page 18: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

CANADA : Constitutional Monarchy

Page 19: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

SOME MAJOR DIFFERENCES• Canadian Constitution is more than one

document• Initially a U.K. statute (Constitution Act 1867)• Amendment provisions differ depending on

type of amendment• Supreme Court not entrenched in

Constitution• Different concepts of separation of powers:

Canadian power concentrated in executive

Page 20: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

SOME SIMILARITIES• Both are constitutions for modern

democracies• Federal constitutions• Bicameral representative legislative

assemblies• Judicial independence

Page 21: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Supreme Court of Canada

Page 22: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

COMPARE AND CONTRAST• U.S. Supreme Court and Supreme

Court of Canada• Jurisdiction, judiciary, leave to appeal,

number of cases heard,

Page 23: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL

• All Commonwealth realms had right of appeal to Privy Council in England. Some retained this after independence but many began to find it out of tune with their values

Page 24: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

Page 25: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

The Hon. Beverley McLachlin, P.C.

• Alberta/British Columbia 1989 (Brian Mulroney) Chief Justice 2000 (Jean Chretien)

Page 26: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

The Honourable Mr. Justice Michel Bastarache

• New Brunswick 1997 (Jean Chretien)

Page 27: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

The Honourable Mr. Justice William Ian Corneil Binnie

• Ontario 1998 (Jean Chretien)

Page 28: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

The Honourable Mr. Justice Louis LaBel

• Quebec 2000 (Jean Chretien)

Page 29: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

The Honourable Madam Justice Marie Deschamps

• Quebec 2002 (Jean Chretien)

Page 30: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

The Honourable Mr. Justice Morris J. Fish

• Quebec 2003 (Jean Chretien)

Page 31: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

The Honourable Madam Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella.

• Ontario 2004 (Paul Martin)

Page 32: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

The Honourable Madam Justice Louise Charron

• Ontario 2004 (Paul Martin)

Page 33: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

The Honourable Mr Justice Marshall Rothstein

• Manitoba 2006 (Stephen Harper)

Page 34: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

The Honourable Madam Justice Louise Arbour

• (Ontario) 1999-2004• Currently U.N. High

Commissioner for Human Rights (2004- )

Page 35: COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

The Honourable Mr. Justice John C. Major

• (Alberta) 1992-2005• Appointed by Brian

Mulroney