133
GlobeTec CONSTRUCTION COMPETENT PERSON TRAINING February 01, 2011

Competent Person Training

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Competent Person Training for Excavations

Citation preview

  • GlobeTec CONSTRUCTION

    COMPETENT PERSON

    TRAINING February 01, 2011

  • "

    o I t

    ~ ;> < u

  • What You Will Learn

    How to prevent fata I ities.

    How to save money~

    Identify hazards before ground is

    roken. ~oil classification.

    - ---.---.~~----,

    How to choose a protective system~

    What to inspect for.

  • I,

    -

    Trench Accident Statistics:

    A large % of all excavation fatalities are "would-be" rescuers.

    An excavation accident is 15 times more likely to result in death than any other construction accident.

    80 % of all deaths occur in < 15ft.

    40 % of all deaths occur in < 10ft.

  • Trench Accident Statistics:

    lIver Worker Fatalities Per Yearll

    Over Serious Injuries per year - Internal Injuries - Broken Bones - Crushed Legs, Ribs, Ankles - Head Injuries

    Multiple Liability Claims - Underground Utilities - Public Injuries I Property Damage

  • Excavation Mishap yths vvork can be completed and back-filled so fast

    that it will not have time to cave-in ..

    A rope tied to a worker will help rescuers find them if the trench caves in.1I (it might, but they'll be dead)1I Cave-in victims can be dug out easily with a backhoeOIlIl(true, but the victims are usually

    disemboweled or decapitated).

    It is possible to out-run a collapsing wall'~

    Dirt smells peculiar just before it caves in~ .'

    UI

  • Why do these "accidents" occur? Possible reasons include:

    Boss has requested you get down into an unsafe trenchlB You don't want to "rock the boat" or get your boss mad by refusinglE

    ~ --- -----_ .. __ .. _-------,

    It is "wimpy" to be afraid of dirtll This is the 50-called "cowboy-ish" effect. This is closely related to peer pressure to do the job and not worry about the safety aspects.

    Not being educated on the hazards of a potential cave-inll

    Attempting to save $$ (and time) by not properly sloping or shoring.

  • .... the Results! I __ mum ----~------- -

    Collapse of trench injures worker ficials said.

    The $12.9 million renovation of Bernville suffers a broken leg during a school renovation 'project. . From our news staff

    A Bernville mansufrered a.bro-ken right leg Tuesday wben a trench collapsed and buried him to his waist during renovations at the PennBernvillet;~ementary Cente in Penn Township:

    43, was in satisfac tory condition 'in Lehigh VaHey Hospital. near Allentown, where be was r twn after the collapse about 11 a.m., officials said.

    was working with a shov-el in a lo.Coot-

  • orne leading reasons for trenching accidents:

    * Soils heavy from rain * Normally-wet soils d

    out, lose the ability to stand on their own

    * Proximity to highways, heavy machinery, or back-filled areas

    * Lack of safety procedures

    * Soft zones * Layered soil * Vibration * Soft pocke * Old utility crossing

    trench * Fractured rock

  • ,cavator's Trench Is Not Good Enough An excavation contractor has won a lit-tle leev;ray and yet lost some ground in its efforts to overturn or mitigate safety citations by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit.

    Dakota Underground Inc. was replac-ing a water main in Fargo, N.D., in Au-gust 1997 when an OSHA-compliance officer made an unscheduled inspection. He cited the firm for four violations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. One was thro"\'.n out by an administrative law judge on review. The three remain-ing citations centered on hazards associ-ated with working in trenches.

    Dakota had a crew of four workers and one foreman. OSHA claimed that at least one worker did not have a safe

    54 ENR/ FEBRUARY 21, 2000

    Appealing before . the " "Elghdl Circuit, Dakota daimed the ladder violation was not willful, that the water violation did not occur and that the three violations should have been "grouped."

    The -willfulness of the ladder citation ""'as supported by substantial C'vidence, the appeals court said. Federal regula-tions require that

  • Rescue Considerations General Guidelines

    .Any incident in which a person is trapped, buried or experiencing a medical emergency in a trench or excavation will require the response of the Trench Rescue Team (TRT). -No workers or EMS personnel shall enter an unprotected trench to render patient care or perform disentanglement operations. AU trenches shall be "safe and protected" using approved methods prior to entry by any TRT personnel.

    oAIl emergency vehicles shall park at least 100 feet from the collapse site. The only exception shall be the trench rescue trailer which may park no closer than 50 feet.

    -All traffic shall be stopped or detoured within 300 feet of the collapse zone. A hazard zone shall be established to control at least 75 feet around the perimeter of the collapse zone. This should be done with fire line tape.

    Whatever You Do" .. Don't "Don't go, don't go, don't go in the hole."

  • Definition - Trench

    OSHA defines a trench as " ... a narrow excavation (in relation to its length) made below the surface of the ground. The depth is greater than the width, but the width of a trench (measured at the bottom) is

    ~~ ,-" .',( - ". "' h 1 fi 11" not greater t an 5 eet ..... ,-"'~,_ ,;, , :.', ."

    I

  • Definition .. Excavation ------- -I

    An excavation is defined as any man-made cavity, trench, or depression in the earth surface formed by earth removal.

    ffi Therefore, it can be assumed that aU trenches are excavations, but not all . excavations are trenches.

  • Soil Pressure / i2:ht

    Cubic Foot of Soil = approxil -~,~ _Woad

    Cubic Yard of Soil = 27 Cubic Feet or

    Volkswagen Beetle =

    Typical trench wall collapse involves ..... _ ',~' __ ~~_~ of soil.

    Workers in trench exposed to anywhere from :- . ~ u. __ .~_ during a typical

    trench cave .... in!

  • '" t

    \ "II-...... ~ D.. .... Q aD ~

    "'"\ &.!"i N

    ,....

  • rough approximation: Pv=rh, P v 2 Ph

    @ 1998, Alan J. Scott

    ~ 100 lb/ft3

    Vejrtieal Soil Pressure = 500 Ib/ft2. horizontal pre s sure .... 250 lb/ft.2 but only on one side ere ating mftability

  • Is this a safe situation? Notice the huge tension cracks developing in the soil behind the worker. Why is the worker putting themselves into harms way? There is 110 sloping or retaining structure for the soil behind the worker.

  • SHA Standaras

    Designed to protect workers in trenches.

    If accurately complied with most fatalities would be eliminated[l Injuries significantly reduced.

    Prevention of liability claims and ~ lawsuits involving underground utilities, homeowners, and members of the publicI!

  • Excavations - Subpart P ---------------------

    1926 650 Scope, Application, and Definitions 192611651 Specific Excavation Requiremen 192611652 Requirements for Protective Systems Appendix A Soil Classification Appendix B Sloping and Benching Appendix C Timber Shoring for Trenches Appendix D Aluminum Hydraulic Shoring Appendix E Alternatives to Timber Shori'ng Appendix f Selection of Protective Systems

  • cope, Application, Definitions _ ____________ _ ____ __ n __ ~

    - This subpart applies to all open excavations made in the earth's surface.. Excavations are defined to include trencheslB (Any time soil is removed from the ground.)

    Ke}, Definition - Competent person - One who is capable of identifying existing and

    predictable hazards in the surroundings, or-working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous to employees, acndi;who has authorization to take prompt correcti'vE! measures to eliminate them.

  • I

    What Makes you an Excavation Competent Person?

    You MUSThave specific training in and be

    knowledgeabl~ about: c~ ffi Soil Typing & analysis

    ffi The different kinds of protective systems & their proper use

    ffi Hazard recogn.i,t'~Q:I1L' ~ When a regi~~f.4 ... ,

    P.E. is requiri;d:'::~.: ;::,:,;.' ~ Knowledge ot:~cc

    Subpart P

  • n

    U) e o cu o.

    g. ~ .5 U) CU -C fa ._

    .e e ...., __ ...., fa fa I-

    e .e U) ...., U)

    CU 8

  • Potential for Cave-in?

    Slope Design Based On Soil Type

    Appendices A & B

    Tabulated Data

    Design By A Registered Professional Engineer

    Excavation> 5 Feet?

    Excavation> 20 Feet?

    Soil Type Detennined? Slope L5H: IV

    Shoring Or Shielding

    Timber Shoring v Appendices A& C

    Hydraulic Shoring Appendices A & D

    Shields, Jacks Appendices A & E

  • n

  • Specific Requirements

    ~urface Encumbrances

    Underground Installations

    Access & Egress vehicular Traffic Falling Loads Mobile equipment

    Hazardous Atmospher

    Water ccumulation

    Adjacent tructures

    Loose Rock Inspections Fall Protecti

  • pecific Requirements

    - All which create a hazard to employees removed or supported as necessary to safeguard employees. Examples include trees, rocks, telephone poles, signs, tanks, sidewalks, etc II

  • pecific Requirements

    - Estimate location of all utilities and underground installations prior to opening an excavation. '

    - Safe means used when nea ri n9 identified utilities in excavation.

    - Underground installations protected, supported or removed as necessary to safeguard employees working in the excavation.

  • BEFORE CALL YOU DIG!

    - Notify facility owners through PA One Call System at least 3, but no more than 10 days prior to start of excavationm;

    I!II i!i!!

    I I ust request info at least 10 but no more

    that 90 working days before final design.s iii

    - Required to be a member of PA One Call System !I

  • I

    I-I .....

    I ..

    u

  • CALL BEFORE YOU DIG!

    COLOR CODE fORMAAKING

    UNDERGROUND UnUTV 'l..i"~v'

    COMMUNICATfON CATV

    WATER

    SEWER

    TEMPORARY SURVEY MARKINGS PROPOSED EXCAVATION

    ALLOTM.R A~ 1~ ... aa2ii232 NEW dERSEY ONE CALL

    TYPICAL CODES FORMARKOUT

    Ga$,a~SfMm, ~~4Jr Ga~~1s

    WHITE.

    ~ &tawmn

  • I u~ Potential Liability Costs

    ,

    l.npper Trunk Lines: Lost revenue can run aDDroximately $2S,Ouu per minute.

    I-iber Optic Lines: Lost revenue can run as much as

    ,000 to $100,Ouu per inutell

  • Pioneer Press, Saturday, December 12, 1998 Tide - St. Cloud gas main explosion kills four

  • Specific Requirements

    Underground installations protected, supported or removed as necessary to safeguard employees working in the excavation.

  • Overhead Line CI rance

    For lines rated 50 kVtl or below, minimum clearance between the lines and any part of the equipment or loa shall be 20 feetll

    For lines rated over 50 kVllt 20 feet plus 4 inches for each 10 kVII over 50 kV.

    A person shall be designated to observe clearance when operator's view is obstructed.

    H'.I> ...... ~ltaBe.L"",D DlimI1D . ~ .. .:.,e :mJM rOlWer

    -]

  • s cific ts equlrem

    - Structural ramps designed by competent personm

    -- Ramps and runways of uniform thickness and connected to prevent movementll

    - Ramps cleated to prevent slipping on top. - Cleats used to connect runway members,

    attached to bottom.

    Stairway, ladder, or ramp provided in a'll. excavations over 4 feet deep, no more than 25 feet of lateral travel ..

  • Specific Reauirements

    arning vests worn by all employees exposed to traffic~

    - No employees allowed under loads lifted by digging or lifting equipment, or near vehicles being loaded.

    - Barricades, stop logs, or signals used when mobile equipment operated near edge of excavation ..

  • Specific equlrements

    - Test excavations over 4 feet deep if located where problems could reasonably be expected .. (Oxy .. < 191150/0 or > 230/0 )

    - Provide adequate ventilation"

    - Control flammables 20% of lEL) - Emergency rescue equipment available~

    - Deep and confined excavations entered 11'1 0 full-body harness and lifeline, attended>at all timesli

  • Hazardous tmos s

    + THE PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER . 9/11/02 www.philly.com Suburbs C 15

    er INQ~E=~~~'TER. . .11.lltJ~n~~W:~I~~'~= ~~~;!!:O~~~t~,r::~s=

    A Philadelphia man who, was 'rum'consCibus with oxygen until . unidentified firefighter. They sealing the foundation of anew firefighters were able to haul and several other emergency home in central Bucks County the men out of, the .+by-8-foot workers underwent decontami.-died' yesterday when fumes ditcb with harnesses. nation as a precaution, hospital from a . waterproofing com- The victims'names were not spokeswoman Karen McCurdy 'pound overcame him. ' released. said.

    . The 36-~arold victim may Theaccid.entoccurred . Rub--R-Wall, composed of hy-have been using the substance around noon along Creek Road drocarbon polymers and sol-without proper ventilation, New in New Britain, where the foun- vents, is only hazardous in liq-Britain Township Police Chief. dation of a single-family home uidform, McCurdy saieJ .. "Once Robert Scafidi said. Federal oe- had been recently poured. ;;m~ it hardens, it is ba.sitally in~rt."

    ~;::e~=~_ ~~~S~ said.

    New Britain Police Officers ShaWn Knight and Robert

    A compliance officer for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration was at the scene investigating, said George Tom-chick, regional OSHA director in Allentown .

    ~cUUs at Rubber Polymner Corp., of Akron, Ohio, which makes Rub-R-Wall, were not available for comment. The workers' employer, Dale Wa1ter-proofing Systems . of Doyles-toWn, did not return a. callse!ek-ing comment.

    Contact LNry King at 215-345-0446 or [email protected].

    --

    J

  • 5vecific Requirements

    - No work in excavations with accumulated water unless adequately protected by water removal, special support or shield systems, or harness and lifeline ..

    -- Water removal equipment monitored by competent person.

    -- Natural flows prevented from enteringll

  • pecific Requirements

    - Protected with shoring, bracing, or underpinning.

    - May require PE design.

    - Sidewalks, pavement, not undermined unless supported to protect employees from collapse.

    -------,------------------_ .. _--------,

  • Specific Requirements --_.- ---- .. -... --... -.. ------1

    - Scale to remove loose material~

    - Barricades to stop falling materials ..

    - Spoil pile and other materials kept back 2 feet from edge of excavation, orwlth retaining devices!!

  • pecific Requirements

    inspections made by competent person. Document!

    - Inspections required after rainstorm or other hazards.

    - Anytime conditions change.

    - Employees removed until hazard corrected II

  • INSPECTING FOR?

    lIossible cave-ins

    Protection system failures

    Hazardous atmosphere

    Falling objecc Any other

    hazards

  • ecific Requirements

    - Walkways or bridges provided over excavations. (6 feet) Standard guardrails are requiredli

    - Wells, pits, shafts must be barricaded, covered, or backfilledll

    - (From Subpart M-Fall Protection) Guardrails systems, fences or barricades required when excavation is not readily visible due to plant growth or other visual barrier.

  • Soil Classification Reauired When:

    Slope of excavation greater than 1 1/2: 1 or 34 aegrees.

    Benching is used in the excavationl! Timber Shoring is used. Aluminum Hydraulic Shorina is used. Alternatives to Timber Shorina are used.

    If you assume worst case scenario -C Soil - No Classification Require

    =:J

  • Apuendix A - Soil Classification ==:J

    Unconfined Compressive Strength ... Load per unit area at which a soil will fail in compressionml Determined by laboratory testing or estimated by use of a pocket penetrometer, thumb penetration, and other tes.~11

    Basis of Soil Classification - Classification based on at least m I and at least analysis, conducted by a competent person using tests described in Appendix A, Sec:tion\(d) ... Acceptable visual and manual tests~

  • ndix A .. Soil Classification

    us III ............

    Stable Rock ... natural solid mineral matter that can be excavated with vertical sides and remain intactll

    Type A - cohesive soil with unconfined compressive strength of 1115 tons per square footlJ - Never type A if:

    Fissured or previously disturbed. Subject to vibration from traffic, pile driving, etc. Part of a sloped, layered system where laye"l'"s di>p

    into excavation on a slope of 4H:1V or greaterll Subject to other factors making it unstablea

  • Appendix - Soil Classification Type B .. cohesive soil with unconfined compressive strength greater than 0115 tsf but less than 195 tsf~ - ...... ranular soils and crushed rockBi - Previously disturbed soils, except those classified

    as type C - Soil that meets compressive strength for Type

    Soil but is fissured or subject to vibration.

    Type C ... cohesive soils with unconfined compressive strength of 0 .. 5 tsf or lessB -- .. -ranular soils including gravel and sandlm -- Submerged soils or soils where water is freely. .-seeping ..

    - Submerged rock that is not stablell

  • ppendix A - Soil Classification

    CL.

    SOLID ROCK

    CL. -A

    CLASS-B

    CLASS-C

    COMPRESSIVE STRENGlH

    A NO VIBRATION,

    > 1.5 TSF FISSURES OR LAYE

    > 0.5 but < 1.5 TSF ".

  • ~

    I ...

    HOW TO TELL

    VISUAL GRAIN SIZE CLUMPING TENSION CRACKS LAYERING WATER VIBRATION

    MANUAL PLASTICITY TEST DRY STRENGTH

    TEST THUMB

    PENETRATION DRYING TEST

    " .

    PEN ETROM Et:I!"R>':;~',. : ~-: .C~ ,,,, ':f-. ':/

  • "-

    Appendix A - Soil Classification 1:-1

    Visual Tests - Excavation site in general, adjacent soil, sides of open

    excavation, samples of soil taken from excavated material. - Particle size indicates cohesive or granular soil. - Soil that clumps is cohesive, granular soils break up. - Cracked sides of excavation and spalling of materials off

    excavation wall indicates fissured soil. - Look for existing utilities and other structures which indicate

    previously disturbed soils. - Observe layered systems and estimate slope. (4H:1Vl,,," .... - Look for surface water, water seeping from excavatid"~~ahii"'

    location of level of water table. - Look for sources of vibration - traffiC, pile driving~"~~,

    boring etc.

  • endi oil Classification anual -.-ests

    - - - I

    I

    - Dry Strength ... Crumbles with minor pressure if it is granular soila If broken with great difficulty it is unfissured soilll

    e I i - Drying Test

    Cracking indicates fissured soil Difficulty breaking indicates cohesive soil Easily pulverized indicates granular soil

    I

  • PLASTICITY TEST

    ROLLA "WORM"- 2" x 1/8"

    IFITDOES NOTI NON-COHESIVE I

    WORK TYPE B OR C

    IF IT WORKS COHESIVE A, B, or C,

  • ppendix A - Soil Classification

    Plasticitv (or ribbon test) i

    " I .,

    - The cylinder is then placed across the palm of the hand and squeezed between the thumb and index finger until it is approximately 1/8 inch thick.

    I

    ciaYI! - The longer the ribbon the more clay, the shorter the ribbon

    the more silt (or sand) contentm

    ==:J

  • TR T .------:------~~----~---~~--------- .. -.-

    SOIL CRUMBLES ON

    ITS OWN

    HARD TO BREAK INTO

    CLUM

    IT IS G ULAR TYPEBORC

    UNFISSURED TYPE A

    LARGE CLUMPS ARE BETTE

  • '-

    -

    Appendix A - Soil Classification [--=:==1

    Dry Strength Test - Dry soil that crumbles freely or with

    moderate pressure into individual grains is granular.

    - Dry soil that falls into clumps that subsequently break into smaller clumps (and the smaller clumps can be broken only with difficulty) is probably clay in combination with gravel, sand, or silt.

    - If the soil breaks into clumps that do not, ---break into smaller clumps (and the soil (2~A;~~' be broken only with difficulty), the soil.i~t~S'" considered unfissured unless there is vi:$uar::,~:" indication of fissuring.

  • Appendi .. Soil Classification ------- -------J

    trength Test (cont.) Drying a sample of soil that is approximately one inch thick and six inches in diameter until it is thoroughly dry. If the sample develops cracks as it dries, significant fissures are indicatedll Samples that dry without cracking are to be broken by hand. If considerable force is necessary to break a sample, the soil has significant cohesive material content.. The soil can be classified as an unfi;ssured cohesive material and the unconfined com'presslve . strength should be determinedll

  • Appendix A - Soil Classification . . n__ .,

    Strenath Test (cont.) If a sample breaks easily by hand, it is either a fissured cohesive material or a granular materialll To distinguish between the two, pulverize the dried clumps of the sample by hand or by stepping on them .. If the clumps do not pulverize easily, the material is cohesive with fissuresfi If they pulverize easily into very small fragments, the material is

    granular~

  • THUMB PENETRATI ~

    (UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH)

    PAST THE TYPE C KNUCKIJE < 0.5 TSF

    -

    TO THE TYPEB UCKIJE > 0.5 & < 1.5 TSF

    JUST AN DENT I TYPE A > 1.5 TSF

  • ppendix A - Soil Classification

    Thumb Penetration Test ..

    I i II i

    /IU

    - If the thumb makes an indentation in the soil only with great effort, the soil is probably Type ArA

    III!

    - - TE: This is a very subjective test and has a large degree of inaccuracYIi

    I '" I

  • DRYING TEST 1-

    DRY A 1" x 6" DIAMETER SAMPLE

    CRACKS AS IT DRIE

    HARD TO BREAK

    EASY TO BREAK

    FISSURES TYPEB ORC

    UNFISSURE COHESIVE TYPE A

    COHESIVE WITH~~ FISSURES OR GRANULAR

    TYPEBORC

  • Two Widely Used Field Tests

    Pocket Penetrometer "" Measures the unconfined compressive strength. Note: These instruments have an error rate of +30%.

    Shearvane (or Torvane) -Measures the cohesion. They consist of vanes that are pressed into a level section of undisturbed soil, and the torsional knob is slowly turned until soil failure occurs. These measurements need to be multiplied by 2 to give unconfined compressive strength. Careful attention is needed in

    U".UH~ the dial measurement.

  • Requirements for Protective stems

    Employees in excavations must be protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system except when:

    - Excavation made entirely in stable rock~ - Excavation less than 5 feet deep and

    examination by competent person indicates no potential for cave-insli

    Protective systems designed to resist, with:gut . failure, all potential loads applied to or transmitted to the systemll Excess loadsmiay . include spoil piles, equipment, vehicular traffic, cranes, etc.

    ____ J

  • Requirements for Protective Systems

    ., Manufactured materials used per manufacturer's recommendationsil

    Materials and equipment used for system free from damage or defects.

    1Jamaged equipment inspected by competent person or registered professional engineere

    Members of support systems secured together to prevent sliding, falling, kick outs, or other failuresl5

    Removed from bottom of excavation firstlm Backfilling progresses with removal of

    members.

    ~

  • Protective Systems

    ~nil Classification SloDina & Benchina ( Timber Shoring ( Aluminum Shorina ( Alternatives Systems ( ~elect the System (

  • - Selection of Protective Sv~tprn~

    ---......,. -1 ~~AA ... IIIOJ' ....

    Common sense approach to selecting the proper protective system for working in any excavationa; Only for excavations 20 feet or less in depths; If over 20 feet deep, be designed by a registered professional engineer. Makes the excavation standard easy to follow and use.

    Should be the first step taken when planning,a-n excavation.

  • Excavation> 5 Feet?

    B V ' , r Potential for Cave-in? I Excavation> 20 Feet? f I t, J I 11

    r I~~" I ' "t"

    Yes ~ I '-', I + ~ "! 4-, " I Soil Type Detennined? .,,' f: .. Slope "0 ~. 1.5H: IV =

    I ~fcs I 1 I ,j, I I Vertical Sides ~ 1iv I ' I Yes Solid Rock? I Shoring Or Shielding Sloping , I I: f" 1 Nfl f; ... , ','" ---~ l I

    Slope Design Based .. Timber,Slloring v

    On Soil Type AppendicesA & c Appendices A & B

    --. Hydraulic Shoring Tabulated Data

    Appendices A & D '". ___ -~-,-. -~-.'P'""

    '...,

    ... 4- Shields, Jacks Appendices A & E

    Design By A Registered -",.

    Professional Engineer ... .... - -------------------- .

  • Tabulated Dat ~----~----~~------------------~--~--~------~~--~.~

    Identification of parameters that affected the selecti

    Identification of the limits of use of the data

    Explanatory informatio

  • (Sloping & Benching Options) Design of sloping and benching systems in accordance with 1 of 4 options below:

    _____ - - Sloped 11/2 horizontal to 1 vertical (34 degrees)

    ----- .. Determination of slopes using appendices A & B

    I n - Designs using other tabulated data Kept in written form at site during

    construction Specifies all parameters and limi

    ~~- Design by a registered professional !II

    engineer

  • dix - Sloping and Benching

    Refer to Appendix B illustrations for allowable slopes and benches for Types A, 8, land C soilsm

    Benches allowed only in Types A and Type B Cohesive soils.

    Support or shield systems can be used in conjunction with slopingll - Slope above support or shield must begin 18

    inches below the top of the support or shield system.

    Layered soils can be sloped separately for e~:. type of soil, unless less stable soil is on t_ bottom layerll If less stable on bottom -centire . slope must meet less stable soil sloping

    ill

    requlremen'l.~~

    =:=J

  • aximum Allowable Slopes

    Stable Rock Vertical 90

    Type A Soil 3/4 : 1 53

    Type B Soil 1 : 1 45

    Type C Soil 1.5 : 1 34

  • Sloping Requirements for Layered Soils

    Slope Required For Each Soil Layer --"------------------,."."---'"-,.,"'---,-,--"' ,,-""'""" ----,--,--,,----- -------------- --------- -_. ---- ---- ---, , ""' -'--~--"-------,,-,-_.,".,,_.,--,---"----., ------ - --.'----"---

    ayered Soil Type Type A Layer Type B Layer Type C Layer B over A C over A C overB

    1------------

    A over B ~-,-,-"'-".,-,.--.. ---,,-,.,.

    A over C 1---------- ---------------- -------

    B over C

    . . ... _ ... -" -._" .----- _ .... _------,--,. ------- --------"._----,--.. ---

    3/4:1 1:1 ----------- -- ---~------ ,-- ,--_. -----------------" .. _,.-------"'------ ---_.,""-"""--,.,,--

    3/4:1

    1:1 1-1/2: 1

    1:1 .. _----_. -,.,.,------------".

    1:1

    1-1/2:1

    1-1/2: 1 1-1/2: 1

  • o en

    c

    c o

    .....

    .........,

    CO > CO U >< CD (J.) CD a. 0..0 0-_ CJ) en CD

    ......

    0.. E

    (f)

  • .......

    x ro E ro

    ..c ......., ......

    ~ o (J)

    c c o

    .......,

    ro > CO t) >< (l) "O'+-~ 0 u Q.) c c.. Q.) 0 caU5

  • Soil Slo lng

    riPE ,{" SOIL Simple Bench El:(:,,,,,'.ation

    '" T' /l ~ ./ '\,. " -\. I

    20' M~xjm'Jm "....L. ~ ,L11 I ';\U/ 314

    L 4' r,,'l~x"

    TYPE .0. SOI!_ d d f shlelde suPPort~d .~ !c ...... ei porUc.n VeIticallY:51 e

    1." ~ s: -.port or r."ifi~d.....?1 , ~ijl' Syr.!~m LJ ~- 3/4 20' M~ximlJm '- I.. I

    liS" Mi~"

    ,r-

    riPE ,{" SOIL Un:;:IJpport.ed '.'ert.ically sided !O\';!?f ~II::.rtion

    r ... hximum 12 Feet. in depth

    ~1

    L ~~ 112 M~x"

    TYPE A SOIL Simple Slope -- Short. Term

    1\ I 12' ~,Ibximum \\ / A I ,I .LJl \,--_1 1.'2

    Benchin

    TYPE ,{" SOIL UnsupportE>d 'Jertic:ally sided 10'.1er portion

    Mal:imlJm :3 Feet in depth

    : : LJ1 .

    8' f\1:."Jxim IJrn 314

    , E {"SOIL " T r'P 'h E .. .-:.a"f'

  • o (/)

    c c o

    ......

    .......,

    CO > CO U ><

  • OJ aa-..c 0 o (J) c ~ Q.) ~ ..c CD

    .........

    c.. ........ .......,

    ::J ~

  • il lopin B nchin r-. ------.- ---------------

    20' .

    TliFIE B ~:;IJIL r\l1ultiple Bench E:~(:.:.lm'.:tt.icl

    [F-ermitted in (:ohesi1m1e s~)il clnly]

    .'" .. -

    :j :.: I IT. IJ ITI

    "."

    mtf'l f""

    . '

    rLJ.I' 0" .. . . ' .' . ,,/ 1 . 1

    41 rlll~:I:)

    r .... PEBsOIL Sin':lIJ? BJ?nch E:-:c-a'.'-ation

    141 'I A '" s".-J"'. TYPE 8 SOIL

    Supported of shielded Verticall~ sided lower portion

    J'm .

    T .... ' [Permifted in cohesive sClil onl~] ~ ............ // ....... .,/ , /

    ..., -' .. ,. " / ",I) ,,- :Jxlm'Jm ...... ..' /]

    -r~" r---~ / ''\-. SIlPPOit or :::t.i

  • Excavation in layered soil The layer of soil is sloped at 1- _, while the layer of soil is sloped at ___ . "'_

  • Excavation in layered soil where Tvpe A soil tO~$c ' Type C soil. Both theTvee A and Type C soils lfr the excavation must be sloped at 1-112: 1.

  • (Shoring & Shielding Options)

    Design of support systems, shield systems, and other protective systems using 1 of 4 options below:

    , __ , ___ - Designs using appendices A, C, and D ~~- Designs using manufacturers

    tabulated data __ -,~ ~ - Designs using other tabulated data ~~_- Design by a registered professional,

    II!

    engineer

  • ~ -~

    E}(C4 ~4 TIO,,'" & TRE1VCHING DECISIONFLOfV CHART (Appendix F) Excavation> 5 Feet?

    ""' , -~. -

  • Applies when timber shoring is used in trenches less than 20 feet deepil Proper soil classification must be determined first~ Tables are provided for different scenarios: - Tables for each soil tvpem - Depth of trench given in intervalsmm - Horizontal and vertical spacing requiremen

    given for cross braces, wales, and uprigh~~iI - Based on depth and width of trench. - Gives strength requirements for timbers,usedJn

    system~ - Provides required dimensions for timbers

    be usedll

  • ~

    TIMBER SHORING I

    TIMBER SHORING MUST BE PROPERLY DESIGNED USING TABLE DATA (APPENDICES A, C, OR OTHER TABLE DATA),'''OR A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER

    TABLE DATA (NOT FROM APPENDICES A OR C) OR PE SPECS. MUST BE KEPT ON SITE

    MANUFACTURED SHORING MUST FOLLOW ,-~--;}'- '.'.-'

    MFG. SPECIFICATION

    ~

  • n

    I-

    ... bJ:) GJ -= .Q e,-t fa l--t ~ -

    0 IIII11111111111111

    fa OJ

    ,..=

    ~ trJ .,-t U J-c .::.r: ~

    OJ U >< ,.Q ..., ~ e G.J

    -(/)

    -c IIII11111111111111 .~ 0 .::.r: ~ IIII11111111111111 ...,~ ta 0 U) .., GJ U) GJ U II. Q.)(

    La "., ~ PI

  • Timber shoring in a trench approximately:

    13 feet deep and 5 feet wide. " Type B soil.

    Using OSHA specs described in Appendix C: Table C-1.2

    6 x 6 oak cross braces 6 feet horizontally 5 feet vertically

    8 x 8 wales 5 feet vertically

    2 x 6 uprights It 2 feet horizontally

  • - Aluminum Hydraulic Shorini! for Trenches

    -~

    Applies when aluminum hydraulic shoring is used in trenches less than 2 feet deep_

    ., le'roper soil classification must be completed.

    Provides tables for various soil types: -- -ased on soil type, depth, and width

    f trenchll -- -rovides required horizontal an

    vertical spacing. -- -rovides minimum diameters for

    hydraulic cylindersli

  • n

    GJ -a

    -l- illi-~ U}

    .., .., al GJ

    tV CD cu Us. Us. Q. .-4

  • Vertical aluminum hydraulic shoring (w/plywood):

    " 18 feet deep, 13 feet wide Type B soil 3 inch cylinders

    Appendix D, Table 0-1.2 The vertical shores and 3 inch diameter cylinders are placed 5.5 feet o.c. horizontally and 4 feet D.C. vertically.

    Plywood (not structural) is used behind the shores only to prevent local raveling between shores.

  • Exercise 3

    luminum Hydraulic Shorin Waler System

    (Typical) 13 Feet Deep ~ Feet Wide TYDe B Soil 2" Cvlinders availabl

    ----1

  • A horizontal aluminum hydraulic waler system

    -13 feet deep 6 feet wide Type B soil 2 inch cylinders

    Appendix 0, Table 0-1.3

    Cylinders are spaced at 6 feet o.c. horizontally.

    Wales are spaced 4 feet o.c. vertically (3 rows required) 3" x 12" solid' timber sheeting is used. Spaced 2' o.c.

  • Excavation> 5 Feet? I

    , 1 I l .. ,

    Potential for I Excavation> 20 Feet? i' J"O." !". Cave-in? ~ I H : fi c. . ....... [

    I No I I No I Yes r + -l Slo~e I I Soil Type Determined? No 1.5H. IV . T

    """"" ,o} $iL- .. ",'T_ __ ''cw'",;". ______ ""'~$ _. ~ I Yes I ~, ~ I Vertical Sides ~. ,. IV Solid Rock? I I cs

    I Shoring Or Shielding ; Sloping I .. l .. LNo H ". _ ... '{., ... -4." . ".L ... .-.. ~ ... -.~ ...... " ,

    Slope Design Based L Timber Shoring On Soil Type Appendices A & C

    ..

    Appendices A & B 4 Hydraulic Shoring __ .. ,T_. __ ~_ , '","',"., ___ ,~ ___ , " . - ~ . =~"

    Appendices A & D 1 Tabulated Data ,

    ; ...

    Shields, Jacks --....

    "'_" ,-_,_ .... ,. .r, Appendices A & E

    Design By A Registered Professional Engineer 1_

    L.. __ ~_~._~~~ __ ~~ .. __ ~_" _______ __

  • '-.-"

    TRENCH SHIELDS .I/tJ!!Jjj[eTREN~:~':Ji~~:::r::r;TU~ER'S

    . ,. . "iI!>

    C~W8~J MAXIMUMDEPTH TABLe $56PS~ SHIELD CAPACITY MODEL-NO. SOIL riPlt EFP: IotAXfMlllotDl!l'Tll(l'T)

    9~~ SERIAL NO.

    J 0$/07{9a OATEsHIPPt:b

    A B

    C

    C

    "~.POR.USE"T~TEDpA'rAt 1~:orhk.T""'~lIMbMn~'lI'Ia~protec.. ,--~-li!I~.to'OblnplfWllh_OSHA:"""2I CfR~f_.~f"; .

    25 45

    60

    80

    ~3. Treitch'~~o.-",,"kl1tCQCIfdanc:ewlltrk~charL :Ttw-ma~'.~~::;a:::.:~=~i

    =-..., ~.:'.;;" I~

    s: t.io;idi.ciam.t.rpfeW.~br,~~~PIaoedt,_ ~looohr~;

    019117 Glt.woIdMttcNnt &~ ~

    H.I 39';1d

    42' 25' 20'

    16'

    1-'--'1i~ MAX SPREADER LENGTH

    S" SCH80 SPREADER SlZg

    OENERALNOl'EIi FCHI TRE8CH ~USI: 1, J.tIf~~..,.~,..~lMI'ItIfacued~.~ \'lllllVOir:ttlllbulltltdc.tJt .... ~~Dr~ ... ~ l>vGME. 2. GMl!T~~IMVt.~~hit~ ~' ....... ~ ...... ~-~1:iy:GtlCl!.&cih .~.w.s .. __ ...... ,... ....... ~ . ~~ ... ...., dtoti.Mtwhlahl...... ,"

    3~~~ .. ~"" ..... beWOh~lOW1d cordIIi'on. TrM:hatfddhbiKId"~1itIbt1Dddtliilafor..nr

    da~lV':~'.iut."haci~""'Jat~"ma!ie ar~~oI.~~OT~'tM T.~DitaJl.vvtfuntI~"'fh.de"~.b)'.fCl~d pt'olesslonil'......,.. .

    4.,Yh6U.otGM&'TIWdt~""'be~.~,llIiIbfil~1ed ddiI_lIIII!~ofb!OStfA~,Mtti:ft.IStftIdIlQ .. GItIer 1h"'~or:~mayabtll.~~:aMC.-*,~" eav""ii.:iIrUcIUt&~;~~~"'ilcW!Wnolr\fQyoreven .... :'OME.,..not\Ie ...... ror1liMkfuNg.lflflW~~

    1lJJUJf!IE:,..< : -, =~~~~. , ~ ,",' ~Qty.:Ma."'~ . Photw'!l1T'" 74j .. .(.3Q;)

    " .'.

    ., rc:Jl:;6f6S5'If!: '3~ :r.r .,,5SVS-a/3! _._._ .. _- "-~---... --- '" .----.~--.

    TRENCH BOXES MUST BE USED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS, OR A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER

    SPECIFICATIONS MUST BE KEPT ON SITE

  • Requirements for Protective Systems

    Excavation not permitted to mor than 2 feet bel bottom of members of a suppo systelB.R

    Extend at least>I'8(~f aDove top of.cut~

    ~

  • Requirements for Protective Systems -------- J

    Shield systems not overloaded beyond design criteria.

    Must be maintained.

  • Requirements for Protective Systems ~

    ~hielas installed t not permit movement in the event of sudden lateral loaas.

  • Requirements for Protective Systems .=:J

    '--------------'--'--------'-------'-----'-_.

    Employees protected when entering or exiting shieldll

    Employees not permitted inside shields when being installed, removed, or moved v~ttiall.YII

  • c o .-

    '+-' CO > ro

    ""C u Q) ><

    ""C Q) UQ5-:-: (J)S;I

    ON """"""! .......... I--'"O~

    C(J.)"{""""' ...... '"'C ........, C "00 ro

    .Q ~u '+-' ......... 0,) ro CO C" > U 0 ro liI,_ !IiIaiII!I!IIIl U t u) >< (J.) en W > ......

  • )

  • Q) o m --D-c:

    III-

    (/) Q) o

  • ~ o trJ QJ ~

    ~ 8 f\1

    JJ;Je .....

    = QJ ~ ~

  • C/)

    =

  • AGoo ExamDle of an r ngln c 1, .n~;_-n crPl ~ ~ UII:VI..I.II.EiCI IUII: ~

    ffi Conventional sloping wouldn't work because of adjacent buildings & road that had to remai'l1 ~ Existing utilities were located and supported' ~ PeE. shoring plan followed exactly

  • ~ o

  • \~ o

  • n Excellent amDle of all eets o:f .~

    ffi Good example of shoring flagging ffi Good guardrail system around upper perimeter ffi Good impalement protection at lower grade

  • ~ o o l?

  • amples of Barrier Protection

    ~ Barricades or equivalent around excavati.onsc .... to keep employees from falling in

    ffi Similar measures to be taken to keep vehicles or equipment from going into excavation

  • )

  • '-

    A good bottom-line philosophy on excavation safety: E --c-. - l

    It is very risky to cut corners on excavation safety. One accident and there will be law suits, fines, penalties (possible prison time) not to mention personal grief and trauma of losing a co-worker or getting one seriously injured.

    One accident can put you out of business. For the long-term financial and emotional health of your business and co-workers, it is best to follow safety regulations.

  • )

    SKMBT_C35112030819260Di4701203081736Di4701203081756