Complication Rates for Fluoroscopic Guided Interlaminar Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections: Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists and Physicians Dr

  • View
    215

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Text of Complication Rates for Fluoroscopic Guided Interlaminar Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections:...

  • Slide 1
  • Complication Rates for Fluoroscopic Guided Interlaminar Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections: Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists and Physicians Dr. Donald E. Beissel, DNP, CRNA, DAAPM Southwest Interventional Pain Specialists
  • Slide 2
  • Objectives -Discuss the prevalence of chronic spine related pain in the USA -Discuss financial and logistical impediments to access to chronic pain care for rural and elderly patients -Describe the study method of the topic at hand -Describe the complication rates of CRNAs and Physicians when providing fluoroscopic guided LESIs -Describe the implications of this research on rural and elderly patients in need of chronic pain care and the providers who are willing to provide that care -Describe the direction of future research
  • Slide 3
  • Why study this?
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • What SB 682 Meant No Fluoroscopy guidance for CRNAs No Kyphoplasty No Radio Frequency Ablation No Implanted devices until August 28, 2016- Sunset We were given 4 years to get evidence and education programs in order.
  • Slide 8
  • Review of the Literature
  • Slide 9
  • The Cost of Low Back Pain Back pain is the leading cause of disability in the world (Crow and Willis, 2009). Respiratory illness is the only complaint that accounts for more missed work time. Two thirds of of people will experience low back pain (LBP) in their lives. LBP costs $100 billion/year in the USA (Pizzo & Clark, 2012).
  • Slide 10
  • Providers There are fewer than 4,000 physician pain management providers in the USA (Pizzo and Clark, 2012). Multiple physician specialties and advanced practice RNs (including Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists) have billed Medicare for fluoroscopy guided pain management procedures since at least 1998 (Manchikanti, 2004). Providing acute and chronic pain management and treatment is within the professional scope of practice of CRNAs. CRNAs employing pain management techniques is neither new nor unusual and has long been a part of CRNA practice. By virtue of education and individual clinical experience, a CRNA possesses the necessary knowledge and skills to employ therapeutic, physiological, pharmacological, interventional, and psychological modalities in the management and treatment of acute and chronic pain. The AANA believes that it is incumbent upon the individual CRNA to assure his or her competency when delivering anesthesia services, including pain management and treatment. (AANA, 1994)
  • Slide 11
  • Manchikanti Study Manchikanti, et al. studied complication rates for 10,000 consecutive fluoroscopic guided injections near the spine in 2012. Fourteen hundred and fifty of these were interlaminar LESIs. Low complication rate. Basis of comparison for this study.
  • Slide 12
  • Published Complication Rates There are no complication rate studies for CRNAs providing fluoroscopic guided pain procedures. American Society of Anesthesiologists closed claims study. One hundred and fourteen epidural steroid injection complications-total performed unknown (Fitzgibbon, et al.) McGrath, Schaefer, & Malkamaki (2011) found a complication rate of 0.6%, but only studied 123 Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections (LESIs).
  • Slide 13
  • Access and Cost The Lewin Group examine four case studies of rural pain patients in 2012. They compared the cost of care by a local CRNA to traveling to a physician for injections, having surgery, and having no care at all. They found that cost saving and increased quality of life were associated with treatment by the local CRNA over the other options.
  • Slide 14
  • Purpose
  • Slide 15
  • What did this study do? I explored whether or not CRNAs have complication rates similar to physicians when performing fluoroscopic guided interlaminar LESIs. I studied one procedure to establish the methods to study all fluoroscopic guided procedures in the future. This procedure was chosen because it is commonly performed by both CRNAs and physicians (Manchikanti, 2004; Manchikanti, Helm, Singh, & Hirsch, 2014). I also studied cost by determining distance from the CRNA participants to the closes physician pain provide. I tracked participant satisfaction to determine if the providers were satisfied with the data collection process.
  • Slide 16
  • Study Design and Methods
  • Slide 17
  • Recruitment Participants were recruited from across the USA via online pain management discussion boards with over 1,000 members. Twenty-seven expressed interest. Nineteen enrolled. Thirteen completed all phases of data collection.
  • Slide 18
  • Demographics Participants were surveyed about education, experience, and their practice situations.
  • Slide 19
  • Procedural Complications Six month collection period on an Excel spreadsheet. Number of procedures. Incidence of 20 different complications.
  • Slide 20
  • Participant Satisfaction Participants were asked to respond to: the data was easy to collect while performing clinical duties, the study was the right length of time, the study has value for CRNA pain management practice, it was easy to contact the lead researcher with questions about the study and I am willing to be a subject/collect data for future studies of a similar nature.
  • Slide 21
  • Results
  • Slide 22
  • Participant Demographics * Skewed by the 3 practices in urban areas. Mean is 9,164 after the urban sites are removed. **Mean distance to physician provided injections is 97.5 miles when the 3 urban participants are removed.
  • Slide 23
  • Other Results 8 providers have Masters Degrees 5 Providers have Doctoral Degrees (DNP, DNAP, PhD, or EdD) 3 Providers performed the procedures in an office, 1 was in a pain clinic, 8 were in hospitals, and 1 provider worked in both a hospital and a surgery center. There were 3 female CRNAs and 10 male CRNAs.
  • Slide 24
  • Complication Rates
  • Slide 25
  • Slide 26
  • Slide 27
  • Participant Satisfaction
  • Slide 28
  • Limitations
  • Slide 29
  • What? It wasnt perfect? I could not obtain the definitions that Manchikanti, et al. (2012b) used in their study. I used standard, widely accepted definitions of complications. Complication rates between groups in this study may be due to differences in definitions. This procedure only examines one of many fluoroscopic guided injections performed near the spine. That study comes next!
  • Slide 30
  • Direction of Future Research
  • Slide 31
  • The Future A bigger study with all of the fluoroscopic guided injections. Application for AANA Post-Doctoral Fellowship Creation and maintenance of a complications database for CRNAs doing fluoroscopic guided procedures. Use of this data to define safety to guide legal and policy discussions around procedures and patient safety.
  • Slide 32
  • Steps to advance access to CRNA provided pain care Council on Accreditation of Nurse Anesthesia Programs Fellowship in Chronic Pain Management at Hamline University AANA Professional Practice Guidelines for CRNAs Providing Chronic Pain Care NBCRNA Non Surgical Pain Management Specialty Certification This dissertation and future complication studies.
  • Slide 33
  • Discussion
  • Slide 34
  • What about Three participants practice in large metropolitan areas, skewing population and distance results. When discussing rural access, these distance numbers should be excluded. Differences in rates between physicians and CRNAs are likely due to differences in definition, but it is impossible to know. Vasovagal reaction differences may be due to lack of or provision of sedation during procedures. This variable should be included in the next study.
  • Slide 35
  • Provider Diversity TThe physician group was made up of three anesthesiologists who all practice in the same group. TThe CRNA participants had diverse levels of education, CRNA experience, pain injection experience, injection performance frequency, and practice setting. NNone of the complications were correlated with any of the CRNA demographics. TThis refutes claims that CRNAs have higher complication rates due to training and education (Manchikanti, 2012a).
  • Slide 36
  • What about Paralysis and Death TThere were no episodes of patient paralysis or death in either study group. TThere were 3,238 combined procedures by both groups of providers in this study. TThis suggests that this procedure is safe when performed by members of either profession.
  • Slide 37
  • Implications for Practice
  • Slide 38
  • How do we apply this? This project addressed the ethical issue of access to and distribution of care. The current pain management system is primarily comprised of physician providers in populated urban areas and non-physician providers, including CRNAs, practicing primarily in rural areas with financially disadvantaged patients. (The Lewin Group, 2012). Rural and disadvantaged patients have difficulty traveling to, or paying for physician provid