Upload
others
View
11
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Concerning Features and Pathologic FracturesSARAH BOLANDER, MMS, PA-C
Objectives1. Discuss critical history and physical exam components for musculoskeletal tumors/lesions
2. Differentiate aggressive and nonaggressive features on imaging
3. Describe most common clinical presentations and imaging features for the following bone tumors/lesions:
Benign:OsteochondromaEnchondromaOsteoid osteomaOsteoblastomaGiant cell tumorUnicameral bone cystAneurysmal bone cystNon-ossifying fibromaFibrous dysplasia
Malignant:Multiple myelomaOsteosarcomaEwing sarcomaChondrosarcoma
Metastatic tumors
Osteomyelitis
Bone TumorsBenign◦ Latent, active, aggressive
◦ Tumor-like: bone cysts
Malignant◦ Primary
◦ Benign bone tumors are 100x more likely then primary malignant tumors
◦ Secondary
◦ > 30-40 yo: always consider metastasis or plasmacytoma (leading to multiple myeloma)
Clinical PresentationPattern of pain◦ Prior to injury◦ Night, rest, exercise
Medication: ◦ Analgesics or NSAIDS and response◦ Steroid use (bone infarcts)
History of trauma◦ Mechanism of injury
Cancer history◦ Metastasis considerations
Benign: majority asymptomatic◦ Localized pain typically correlates
with the aggressive nature of the lesion
Malignant◦ Variable pain and/or swelling for
weeks to months◦ Soft tissue mass
Metastatic ◦ History of cancer◦ >30 yo: ddx of metastatic and
myeloma even with benign featuresPati
ent
His
tory
Age
Radiology Assistant
< 30 yo
> 30 yo
Location, Location, Location
Radiology Assistant
ImagingRadiographic Imaging: first-line for all tumors◦ Entire bone needs to be imaged◦ Reliable resource to follow benign lesions
◦ May be definitive diagnosis for some benign lesions preventing further studies
MRI: preferred with aggressive features on radiographs ◦ Distinguishes activity of lesion
◦ Bone edema, periosteal reaction, soft tissue mass
CT: sensitive for cortical destruction and mineralization◦ Beneficial: osteoid osteomas and differentiating cartilage lesions
Bone Scan (Technetium Tc 99m): Sensitive for new bone formation
Characteristics of Lesions
Benign or Nonaggressive/Early Malignant
Malignant or Aggressive Benign
Border Well-defined, Sclerotic marginNarrow zone of transition
Ill-definedWide zone of transition
Growth Rate Slow Rapid
Bone Destruction ConfinedGeographic
Infiltrative, cortical destructionMoth-eaten, permeative
Periosteal Reaction UnilaminarSolid
MultilaminarInterrupted
Soft Tissue Involvement Absent Present
BorderWELL-DEFINED, NARROW ZONE OF TRANSITION ILL-DEFINED, WIDE ZONE OF TRANSITION
Case courtesy of Dr Hani Salam, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 7874Case courtesy of A.Prof Frank Gaillard, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 7473
Bone DestructionCONFINED: GEOGRAPHIC INFILTRATIVE: MOTH-EATEN/PERMEATIVE
Cas
e co
urt
esy
of
Dr
Han
i Sal
am, R
adio
pae
dia
.org
, rID
: 80
02
Cas
e co
urt
esy
of
A.P
rof
Fran
k G
ailla
rd, R
adio
pae
dia
.org
, rID
: 14
00
3
Cas
e co
urt
esy
of
Dr
Ro
ber
to S
chu
ber
t, R
adio
pae
dia
.org
, rID
: 14
17
3
Periosteal Reaction
Case courtesy of Dr Roberto Schubert, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 23796
Codman Triangle
Case courtesy of A.Prof Frank Gaillard, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 36446
Sunburst
Case courtesy of mehul, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 53960
Soft Tissue Involvement
Case courtesy of Dr Hani Salam, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 8024
Matrix • Cumulus cloudOsteoblastic
• Arcs and rings
• PopcornCartilage
• Ground glassFibrous
• LyticNot
Appreciated
Bone Matrix
OsteochondromaBenign bone tumor with cartilage cap: most common◦ Developmental anomaly ◦ Typically solitary appearing during rapid growth
LE > UE
Clinical presentation: asymptomatic◦ Mechanical symptoms: nerve/vascular compression,
Imaging: radiographs (MRI malignancy concerns)◦ Sessile or pedunculated
Malignancy risk: growth following skeletal maturity or aggressive features (cartilage cap > 1.5 cm)◦ 1% risk with solitary lesion◦ MHE: Multiple Hereditary Exostosis (5-25% risk)
Case courtesy of Dr Shrikant Nagare, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 35669
EnchondromaIntramedullary cartilage tumor◦ Metaphyseal
Early adulthood
Clinical presentation: asymptomatic◦ Pain with pathologic fracture
Imaging: incidental finding◦ Radiographs: nonaggressive lytic lesion◦ +/- expansile: hands/feet◦ No periosteal reaction or soft tissue involvement
Rare transformation to chondrosarcoma◦ Concerns with pain or if epiphyseal◦ MRI helps with differentiation
Case courtesy of Radswiki, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 11389
Osteoid OsteomaBenign bone forming tumors
◦ Long bones > phalanges > vertebrae
10-35 yo, M > F
Classic presentation: severe, deep night pain◦ Relieved by ASA
Lucent nidus surrounded by fibrovascular rim with surrounding sclerosis◦ Nidus is < 2 cm, releases prostaglandins causing pain
Imaging: Radiographs may be normal or cortical thickening with lucent nidus◦ CT modality of choice
Case courtesy of Dr Jeremy Jones, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 6131
OsteoblastomaRare, benign bone tumor◦ Histologically similar presentation to osteoid osteoma
◦ Axial skeleton > long bones
Locally aggressive
Middle-age, M>F
Clinical Presentation: dull pain◦ Worse at night
◦ Unresponsive to ASA
Imaging: expansile lytic with sclerotic rim◦ Radiographs, CT, but MRI less beneficial
Case courtesy of Dr Henry Knipe, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 48855
Giant Cell TumorBenign, Aggressive tumor◦ Following growth plate closure
◦ Metaphysis through epiphysis of long bones
◦ Femur/tibia > radius, sacrum, vertebrae
Early adulthood
Clinical presentation: Insidious bone pain◦ Soft tissue mass
◦ May be found incidentally
Imaging: Well-defined, eccentric, abut articular surface without sclerotic rim◦ Radiographs, MRI
Case courtesy of Radswiki, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 11453
Unicameral Bone Cyst: UBCMost common benign bone lesion◦ “Simple Bone Cyst”◦ Metaphysis long bones: upper humerus > femur
Adolescents
Clinical Presentation: asymptomatic◦ Pathologic fracture presenting sx
Imaging: Geographic, well-defined◦ Radiographs (MRI/CT typically not needed)◦ Nonaggressive, expansile◦ Pathologic fx: fallen leaf (fragment) sign
Aneurysmal Bone Cyst: ABC
Expansile tumor-like lesion◦ Metaphysis of long bones > spine
80% < 20 yo
1/3 secondary to underlying cause
Clinical presentation:◦ Asymptomatic
◦ Pathologic fracture or palpable mass
Imaging: osteolytic with thin cortex◦ Radiographs
◦ MRI: Fluid-Fluid levels
Case courtesy of Dr Alexandra Stanislavsky, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 14333
Non-Ossifying Fibroma: NOFBenign fibrous lesion◦ Larger cortical defect (>3 cm)
10-15 yo, M>F
Clinical Presentation: asymptomatic◦ Pathologic fracture
Imaging: Incidental finding◦ Radiographs: nonaggressive features
MES: metaphyseal, eccentric, sclerotic
Case courtesy of Dr Erik Ranschaert, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 10862
Fibrous DysplasiaOften asymptomatic and incidental finding on imaging
Symptoms may arise from bone expansion ◦ Cosmetic appearance
◦ Soft tissue compression or displacement
Monostotic > Polyostotic
Imaging: Radiographs and CT◦ “Ground Glass” opacities
◦ Well-defined, no periosteal reaction
Case courtesy of Dr Salman S. Albakheet, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 60893
Multiple MyelomaMultiple Myeloma: Most common primary bone neoplasm in adults◦ Bone marrow: entire skeleton involved
◦ Most common vertebrae
>40 yo, M>F,
Risk: radiation or pesticide exposure, HIV
Clinical Presentation: Fatigue, fever, night sweats, diffuse bone pain
Imaging: Skeletal survey◦ Radiographs: punched out lesions
◦ MRI more sensitive and PET-CT helps with distribution
Labs: Anemia (normochromic/normocytic), hypercalcemia◦ Reverse albumin/globulin ratio
◦ U/A shows Bence-Jones proteins
OsteosarcomaHigh grade malignancy
Most common primary bone tumor in young patients◦ Primary tumor: 10-20 yo
◦ Distal femur > proximal tibia > humerus
◦ Secondary tumors due to malignant degeneration: elderly
2nd and 3rd decades of life
Clinical Presentation (primary):◦ Bone pain, soft tissue mass◦ Pathologic fracture
Imaging: Aggressive features◦ Permeative, sunburst, Codman triangle◦ MRI: Essential tool, soft tissue involvement
Case courtesy of A.Prof Frank Gaillard, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 7529
Ewing SarcomaHighly malignant primary bone tumor◦ Metadiaphysis, diaphysis: Femur > tibia, humerus,
pelvis◦ Large tumors
10-20 yo, M > F
Clinical Presentation: local pain◦ May have soft tissue mass or pathologic fracture◦ +/- fever with elevated ESR
Imaging: Aggressive features◦ Permeative, onion skin◦ Soft tissue extension
Case courtesy of A.Prof Frank Gaillard, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 7844
ChondrosarcomaMalignant cartilaginous tumor
◦ Primary and secondary tumors
◦ Femur > pelvis > UE
Middle age to older adults
Low-immeadiate grade
Clinical presentation:
◦ Pathologic fracture
◦ Palpable mass
Imaging: aggressive, lytic
◦ Calcifications: rings and arcs
◦ Moth eaten, permeative
Case courtesy of Dr Domenico Nicoletti, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 30655
Metastatic TumorsLead Kettle (PB-KTL): Prostate, Breast, Kidney, Thyroid, Lung
Clinical Presentation: Asymptomatic
◦ Pathologic fracture, soft tissue mass, localized pain
Diagnostics:
◦ Labs: anemia
◦ Imaging: vertebrae, proximal femur/humerus, pelvis, skull
◦ Osteolytic bone destruction (KTL), osteoblastic/sclerotic (P), or mixed (B)
◦ Bone Scan
Osteomyelitis Bacterial >> Fungal, TB, Virus
LE > vertebrae, radial styloid, SI joint◦ Neonates: metaphyseal/epiphyseal
◦ Children: metaphysis
◦ Adults: epiphyseal/subchondral regions
Always a differential for aggressive lesions
1. Direct extension: open wound◦ Diabetic foot ulcer, post op infection
2. Hematogenous spread of infection: most common
◦ 80-90%: Staphylococcus aureus◦ Others specific to scenario (i.e. neonates, IVDU, etc)
OsteomyelitisImaging
Earliest Consideration: Soft Tissue swelling
Radiographs:◦ Localized Osteopenia
◦ Lytic lesion with cortical destruction
◦ Periosteal reaction
MRI: most sensitive and specific for soft tissue and joint involvement
Sequestrum: dead bone, it appears dense as it is devitalized bone◦ Late occurrence
◦ CT helpful
Case courtesy of A.Prof Frank Gaillard, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 7651
Correlate FindingsHISTORY, PHYSICAL EXAM, AND DIAGNOSTICS
References and Resources1. Özer, E. Ewing sarcoma / primitive or peripheral neuroectodermal tumor (PNET).
PathologyOutlines.com website. http://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/boneewing.html. Accessed December 27th, 2018.
2. Mehta K, McBee MP, Mihal DC, England EB. Radiographic analysis of bone tumors: a systematic approach. Semin Roentgenol. 2017; 52(4): 194-208.
3. Umer M, Hasan OHA, Khan D, Uddin N, Noordin S. Systematic approach to musculoskeletal benign tumors. Int J Surg Oncol. 2017; 2(11): e46.
4. Costelloe CM, Madewell JE. Radiography in the initial diagnosis of primary bone tumors. Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 200: 3–7.
5. Ennecking WF. Musculoskeletal tumor surgery. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1983.
6. Yildiz C, Erler K, Atesalp AS, Basbozkurt M. Benign bone tumors in children. Curr Opin Pediatr.2003; 15: 58.
7. Cruz AI, Lindskog D. Pathologic fractures through benign bone lesions in children and adolescents. Curr Orthop Pract. 2011; 22(4): 351-361.
8. Miwa S, Otsuka T. Practical use of imaging technique for management of bone and soft tissue tumors. J Orthop Sci. 2017; 22(3): 391-400.
Questions?