27
Corbett School District Master Plan 2014

Corbett School District

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Master Plan 2014. Corbett School District. Master Plan 2014. Middle School. Athletics. Multi-Purpose. High School. Grade School. Site Aerial. SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS. Bond Process. Pre-Bond. Design. Construction. Define & Establish Needs Educational & Curricular Safety & Security - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Corbett School DistrictMaster Plan 2014

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Site Aerial

Grade School

High School

Middle School

Athletics

Multi-Purpose

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Bond Process

School districts cannot use public resources to advocate a position on a ballot measure.

Bond Language must include The purpose for which the bonds will be used. The amount and term of the bonds. The kind of bonds proposed for issue.

Pre-Bond Design Construction

Define & Establish NeedsEducational & CurricularSafety & SecurityOperational & Maintenance

Community OutreachEstablish a Project Budget

Community Outreach/Live DesignDesign a project to meet the needs and aesthetics of the community.Confirm Budget

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Live Design Process

Establish Stakeholder Input Process

Community Based Design Meetings / Live Design

Establish multiple design solutions and seek community feedback.

Check the designs against the fixed budget. Adjust and prioritize the elements of the design to ensure on budget delivery.

Get community approval of the direction.

Fine tune the design with the specialists, science, speech etc.

Roll out the final concept for public comment and adjustment.

Design

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Financial impact of Resident Only School

What does a resident only school look like? Enrollment will drop from 1115 (+/-) students to 700 (+/-)

students. This will result in a 50% drop in revenue. Reduce 4 bus drivers, 3 teacher aides, 1 janitor, 2 principals

and 1 office staff Reduce teaching staff from 62 to 16.8 Due to the required teaching specialties, Special Ed, PE and

high school language the teaching staff would in reality be even smaller.

The average class size would be 41.66 BUT in reality because of the required specialists some classes would be more than 50 students per room. It is not possible to get 41.66 students in any of our existing classrooms.

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Perceived Needs of the School District.

Improved Teaching Spaces Acoustical Daylighting Ventilation, fresh air Larger Classrooms

Better Space Utilization Seismic Safety Energy Conservation Investment in the Future Parking & Traffic

Break up into small groups and discuss what are the most pressing needs of the district:

Turn in 3x5 cardsDiscuss the Issues

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Classroom Count & Building Areas

ClassroomsExisting High School 15Existing Middle School 10Athletic Building 1

26

New High School 16High School Converted to Middle School 15Recover Library for District Office,staff work room, SPED Office

-5

Athletic Building 127

New High School 16High School Converted to Middle School 15Recover Library for District Office,staff work room, SPED Office

-5

New Science Building 2Old Science Lab to become maintenance 0

28

Existing

New Senario One (Retain existing 1950's Science Lab)

New Senario Two (Replace existing Science w/ 2 New Labs)

Elementary School 47,188 SF Existing High School 22,268 SF Without Athletics

Existing Middle School 15,611 SF Athletics Building 26,895 SF

New Middle School 25,861 SF New Science Labs 4,193 SF

Existing & New Areas

RecommendedGross SF/Student

Standard*

CorbettCurrent SF

Enrollment Existing Corbett

SF/StudentElementary School 110 47,188 SF 420 112Middle School 120-150 15,611 SF 275 57High School 160-200 60,085 SF 420 143

122,885 SF

* NCEF, North Dakota

High School w/ New & Science 67,871 SF 420 162Middle School at High School 22,268 SF 275 81

Gross School Size by Student

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

A walkthrough of one potential solution. Please help us develop other ideas and options. How do we make the transition between what we have and what

we need? (temporary classrooms) Feedback from the participants.

What other solutions should we explore? Where should we go from here?

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

Campus Plan

Dining

Existing High School

Athletics

New 2 Story High School Building

New ScienceBuilding

New Locker Rooms

Firetruck TurnAround

Future Parking (+43)

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

Campus Plan

Dining

Middle School

Athletics

Gathering Courtyard Future Parking (+43)

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

Title 9 Locker Rooms

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

Student Courtyard

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

Student Courtyard

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

Temporary Classrooms

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

Campus Plan

Science Building

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

Science Building Floor Plan

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

Science Building

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

Science Building

Wind Screens on Covered Walkway

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

Campus Plan

New High School

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

High School 1st Floor

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

High School 2nd Floor

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

High School North Perspective

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

High School Entry Perspective

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

South High School Entry / Courtyard

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

Student Courtyard

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Master Plan 2014

Student Courtyard

SODERSTROM ARCHITECTS

Next Meetings

Wednesday September the 24th at 7:00pm Review updated concept based on 1st meetings feedback Report on 3x5 card statistics Discuss further refinement and options Small group issues discussion Discuss how to resolve outstanding issues

Wednesday October 8th at 7:00pm Review updated concept based on 2nd meeting Group prioritize issues Propose solutions