51
Psychology 205 Perception Tues, 21 Jan 03 Day 01 Course Website: http://courseinfo.cit.cornell.edu/ courses/psych205

Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

Psychology 205Perception

Tues, 21 Jan 03Day 01

Course Website: http://courseinfo.cit.cornell.edu/courses/psych205

Page 2: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

OutlineMetaphysics, ontology, cosmology (ontogeny), & epistemology“Qualities” of Boyle and Locke primary - extension, shape, motion/rest, number, solidity secondary - color, taste, sound, warmth, smellDescartes & dualismDoctrine of the Specific Energy of Nerves, or: Doctrine of Sensory Qualities -- Johannes MüllerConjecture of Dubois-ReymondMolyneux’s paradox

Page 3: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

Metaphysics

meta ta physika = “after the things of nature”

Aristotle (384-322 BCE)

Page 4: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

Metaphysics

OntologyCosmologyEpistemology

Page 5: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

Metaphysics

Ontology: What is there?Cosmology: Where did it come from?

(in biological development: Ontogeny)Epistemology: How do we know it?

Page 6: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

MetaphysicsEpistemology: How do we know it?

2 options:knowledge comes to us innately, “innate ideas”

Page 7: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

MetaphysicsEpistemology: How do we know it?

2 options:knowledge comes to us innately, “innate ideas”knowledge comes to us through our senses, we know because (of what) we

perceive

Page 8: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

“Qualities” of Boyle and Locke (17th cent)and elaborated from Aristotle

Page 9: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

“Qualities” of Boyle and Locke

primary - extension, shape, motion/rest, number, solidity

Page 10: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

“Qualities” of Boyle and Locke

primary - extension, shape, motion/rest, number, solidity

secondary - color, tonality, warmth, taste, smell

Page 11: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

the five senses, five epistemic channelsAristotle, De Anima

Latinate Anglo-Saxon

vision to see seeing, sight audition to hear hearing cutaneousto touch touching, feeling sensegustation to taste tasting olfaction to smell smelling

Page 12: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

La dame à la licorne

1483-1500 Flemish, now in the Musée

de Cluny, Paris,details

vision

Page 13: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

audition

Page 14: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

touch

Page 15: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

taste

Page 16: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

smell

Page 17: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

Jan Brueghel de Velours & Pierre Paul Rubens, Allegory of the senses, 1617-1618, Prado, Madriddetails

vision

Page 18: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

audition

Page 19: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

touch

Page 20: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

taste

Page 21: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

smell

Page 22: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

Hans Makart, The five senses, ~1880, Osterreichische Galerie, Vienna, details

vision

audition touch taste olfaction

Page 23: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

Other modalities:

kinesthesishaptics = touch + kinesthesis

vestibular & spatial orientationbody schema

pain

Page 24: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

available on website

Page 25: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

available on website

Page 26: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

Extra credits

3 max

http://node15.psych.cornell.edu/susan/extracredit

Page 27: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

Descartes (17th cent) & dualism

mind -> mentalbody -> physical

Page 28: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

Descartes & dualism

mind -> mentalbody -> physical

brain -> physical

Page 29: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

dualism

mind & brain

Page 30: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

dualism

mind & brain

philosophy biologycognitive science neurophysiology

Page 31: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

dualism

mind & brain

philosophy biology

perceptual neurons & neural phenomena circuitry

Page 32: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

dualism

mind & brain

philosophy biology

perceptual neurons & neural phenomena circuitry

“red”

Page 33: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

The Doctrine of the Specific Energies of Nerves

AKA: Doctrine of Sensory Qualitiesan explanation of the

secondary qualities of Locke & Boyle

Johannes Müller (1838) Handbuch der Physiologie des Menschen, Vol.

V, (English translation by William Baly,

1842).

Page 34: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

also available on website

Page 35: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

I. External agencies can give rise to no kind of sensation which cannot also be produced by internal causes, exciting changes in the condition of our nerves.

Page 36: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

II. The same internal cause excites in the different senses different sensations, in each sense the sensations peculiar to it.

Page 37: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

III. The same external cause also gives rise to different sensations in each sense, according to the special endowments of its nerve.

Page 38: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

IV. The peculiar sensations of each nerve of sense can be excited by several distinct causes internal and external.

Page 39: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

V. Sensation consists in the sensorium's receiving through the medium of the nerves, and as the result of the actions of an external cause, a knowledge of certain qualities or conditions, not of [… the ] bodies of the nerves of sense themselves;

and these qualities of the nerves of sense are in all different, the nerve of each sense having its own peculiar quality [or energy].

Page 40: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

VI. The nerve of each sense seems to be capable of one determinant kind of sensation only, and not of those proper to the other organs of sense;

hence one nerve sense cannot take the place and perform the function of another sense.

Page 41: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

VII. The central portions of the nerves included in the encephalon [brain] are susceptible of [the] peculiar sensations [of the nerves], independently of the more peripheral portion of the nervous cords which form the means of communication with the […] organs of sense.

Page 42: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

VIII. The immediate objects of the perception of our senses [normally in the real world] are merely particular states induced in the nerves, and felt as sensations either by the nerves themselves or by the sensorium; ...

Page 43: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

VIII. [cont’d]… but inasmuch as the nerves of the senses are material bodies, and therefore participate in the properties of matter {generally occupying space, being susceptible of vibratory motion, and capable of being changed chemically as well as by the action of heat and electricity}, they make known to the sensorium, by virtue of the changes thus produced in them by external causes, not [...] their own condition, but [… the] properties and changes of condition of external bodies.

Page 44: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

VIII. [cont’d]… The information thus obtained by the senses concerning external nature, varies in each sense, having a relation to the qualities [or energies] of the nerve.

Page 45: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01
Page 46: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

5. epistemic channels [each sense];

external-->nerves-->percept no ESP [27 Feb]; no organ/nerves for ESP

6. no sensory substitution [1 May] blind, deaf ...

7. direct stimulation of the brain --> Conjecture of DuBois-Reymond

8. summary: V --> Molyneux's

paradox III & IV

Page 47: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

From VII: Conjecture of DuBois-Reymond(student of Müller’s)

If one could cross-splice the auditory nerve and the optic nerve, would one “see” thunder and “hear” lightning?

Page 48: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

William Molyneux, Dioptrica Nova, 1692

Molyneux’s Paradox - the orientation of thevisual fieldRelevant to Müller VIII

Molyneux’s Premise - depth perception

Moylneux’s Conjecture - the blind given sight

Page 49: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

From VIII: Molyneux’s Paradox

The image on the back of the retina is upside down and backwards. Why do we not see the world this way?

Page 50: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

From VIII: Molyneux’s Paradox

Why do we not see the world as upside and backwards?

2 general answers:1. Brain re-inverts the image. [wrong]2. “The visive faculty takes no notice of its parts, but uses them as an instrument only.” [right]

Page 51: Cornell PSYCH205: Lecture 01

Psychology 205 Perception

the study of how we know about our world; the study of our bodies, brains, and the functions of our senses;the study of [some of] the roots of knowledge

and culture