21
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. C H A P T E R Defining the Competitive Set 2 Key Question for This Chapter: Who do we or will we compete against?

Customer and Competitors

  • Upload
    gfcgt

  • View
    139

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

C H A P T E R

Defining the Competitive Set2

Key Question for This Chapter: Who do we or will we compete against?

Page 2: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Major Topics for Ch. 2

I. Bases of Competition

II. Levels of Competition*

III. Methods for Determining Competitors**

IV. Right Level of Competition for You

Page 3: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Bases of Competition

I. Product-oriented Approach Similar Physical Attributes Functional Similarity

II. Customer-oriented ApproachWho they are – competition for same budget When they use the productWhy they use the product - benefits sought

Page 4: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Bases of Competition (con’t).

III. Marketing oriented: promotion & distribution

- Media

- Distribution

IV. Resource-oriented Approach (Internal)- Raw materials- Employees- Financial resources

IV. Geographic: Becoming less relevant

Page 5: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Levels of Competition

Diet lemon limes

Baseball cards

Fruit flavored colas

Coffee

DietCoke

DietPepsi

Diet-Rite cola

Bottled water

Lemon limes

Regularcolas

Beer

Juices

Wine

Fast food

Tea

Video rentals

Icecream

Product form competition: Diet colas

Product category competition: Soft drinks

Generic competition: Beverages

Budget competition: Food and entertainment

Page 6: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Example 1: Energy Bar Competition

Odwalla Power Bar

Balance BarClif

Energy Bars

Snack/Health Bars

Healthy Snacks

Other Snacks

Nutrigrain Bars Slimfast Bars Granola Bars

FruitsNutsJuice

CrackersChipsCandy

Page 7: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Example 2: Super-Premium Ice Cream

Level of Competition

Definition Competitors

Product form Super-Premium Haagen-DazsStarbuck/GodivaBen & Jerry’s

Product category Ice cream Breyer’sDreyer’sPrivate labels

Generic Snacks DessertsNovelties

Frito LayNabiscoNestléMrs. FieldsYoplait

Budget Other supermarket, Convenience store products

Many

Page 8: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Example 3: PDA

Level of Competition

Definition Competitors Need Satisfied

Product form Full-featured PDAs Palm Pilot VIIHandspringCompaq AeroPocket PC makers

Personal information management plusintegrated communications

Product category PIM (Personal Information Managers)

Palm IIIRoyalCasio PV-100

PIM only

Generic Tablet PC/Cell phones

ToshibaNokiaSamsung

Other solutions to the above

Budget $100-$1,000

Paper-based solutionsBusiness items costing$100-$1000

RolodexDay TimerFax MachinesPersonal copiersFurniture (e.g. Steelcase)

Page 9: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Levels of Competition: Implications for Product Strategy

Budget

Generic

Product Category

Product Form

Competitive Level

Convince Customers that the Brand is Better than Others

Convince Customers that the Product Form is Best in the

Category

Convince Customers that the Product Category is the Best

Way to Satisfy Needs

Convince Customers that the Generic Benefits are the Most

Appropriate Way to Spend their Money

Product Management Task

Page 10: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Methods for Determining Competitors*

Existing categories: ex) IRI; SIC NAICSwww.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.html

Managerial judgmentCustomer-purchase-based measuresCustomer-judgment-based measures

Page 11: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Managerial Judgment of Competition

Markets Same Different

Product/Services

Same

Different

A

C

B

D

Page 12: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Customer-purchase-based measures

Brand Switching Data The Extent of Substitutability among Brands

Cross-Elasticity of Demand: Change in Brand B’s Sales/ Change in Brand A’s Price

Mainly Used for Nondurable Products

Page 13: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Brand-Switching Matrix

Time t+1

A B C D E

A .6 .2 .2 0 0

B .2 .3 .4 .1 0

C .2 .3 .5 0 0

D 0 .1 .1 .5 .3

E .1 0 0 .4 .5

Time t

Page 14: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Customer-Judgment-Based Measures

Overall similarity (by Perceptual Mapping)*Similarity of consideration setsProduct deletion (based on product

unavailability)Substitution In Use:

List all the uses of a product List other products that provides the same uses

Page 15: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Perceptual Mapping

Means graphic description of customers’ perception about different brands/products.

You can use it to gainBetter understanding of market structureCustomer perceptions for a new product

conceptDirection for R&D efforts to satisfy customers

better

Page 16: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Developing A Perceptual Map

Two Alternative ways Attribute Rating method (AR) Overall Similarity method (OS)

Attribute Rating Method Data Cube (brands*attributes*respondents) Statistical Analysis (Factor Analysis) Find out two (or three) axes for the perceptual map Attribute Analysis Limitations Suitable for B-to-B products

Page 17: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Developing A Perceptual Map

Overall Similarity method (OS) Suitable for consumer products and services Ask consumers’ perception the extent of similarity

of pairs of items. Similarity Data Analysis (Multidimensional Scaling) You name the axes and infer the attributes

Page 18: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Defining Competition with Perceptual Mappingexample: desserts

• Moist• Needs refrigeration

• Tapioca pudding mixLocal mix •

Pudding mix

Chocolate torte mix •

D-zer ta • • Jell-O

• Canned pudding

• Individual pie

• Hostess cupcakes

• Quick bread mix

Good for a coffee break •

As a formal dessert•

Homemade cake •Bakery cake

Homemade cookies

• Cheese cake mix

“Snackin’ Cake” mix •

• Frozen cake

• Layer cake mix

• “Stir’n Frost cake mix

Takes a long time to prepare •

Bundt cake mix •

Custard mix

Boston crème pie mix“Light Style” cake mix

Coffee cake mix •

Bakery cookies •Pillsbury cookie dough •

Cookie mix •

• Easy to carry with meIn my school work lunch •

• Between meal snack

• Pepperidge Farm cookies• Oatmeal cookies

• Frozen pie

• Homemade pie

Date bar mix •

Brownie mix •

••

Bakery pie •

Page 19: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Enterprise Competition in Financial Services

Page 20: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Two Key Things to Remember

I. How would you determine competition?

II. Choose the focal level of competition*

Page 21: Customer and Competitors

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Right Level of Competition for You

I. Your Firm’s Market Position

II. Time Horizon

III. Product Life Cycle and Technology Change

IV. Your Position in the Firm