Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    1/137

    IN THE CIRCUIT COURTOF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUITIN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDAGENERAL CIVIL DIVISION

    NEIL J . GILLESPIE,P l a i n t i f f / C o u n t e r - D e f e n d a n t ,

    CASE NO.: 05-CA-7205vs . DIVISION: GBARKER, RODEMS & COOK,a F l o r i d a c o r p o r a t i o n iJ . COOK,

    p . A. IWILLIAM

    D e f e n d a n t s / C o u n t e r - P l a i n t i f f s .________________________________DEPOSITION OF:TAKEN BY:

    DATE:TIME:PLACE:

    REPORTED BY:

    NEIL J . GILLESPIECounse l fo r D e f e n d a n t s /C o u n t e r - P l a i n t i f f sJune 21, 201110 :38 a .m. to 3 :02 p.m.H i l l s b o r o u g h County Cour thouseF i f t h F l o o r800 E a s t Twiggs S t r e e tTampa, F l o r i d aKimber ly HimesNotary P u b l i cS t a t e o f F l o r i d a a t Large

    RICHARD LEE REPORTING(813) 229-1588

    TAMPA:I 00 North Tampa Street, Suite 2060Tampa, Florida 33602

    email: [email protected] ST . PETERSBUR535 Central Aven

    St. Petersburg, Florida 337

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    2/137

    APPEARANCES:EUGENE P. CASTAGLIUOLO, ESQUIREC a s t a g l i u o l o Law Group, P.A.3111 West Dr. Ma r t in Lu the r King Bouleva rdTampa Bay Park , LakePoin te 2, S u i t e 100Tampa, F lo r id a 33607

    Appeared fo r P l a i n t i f f / C o u n t e r - D e f e n d a n t iRYAN CHRISTOPHER RODEMS, ESQUIREBa rke r , Rodems & Cook, P.A.S u i t e 2100400 North Ashley DriveTampa, F lo r id a 33602Appeared fo r D ef endan t s / C oun t e r - P l a i n t i f f s .

    ALSO PRESENT:D e put i e s of H i l l sbo rough County S h e r i f f ' s O f f i c eHonorab le James D. Arno ld

    PAGEExamina t ion by Mr. Rodems

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    DESCRIPTION

    N ot i c e o f F i l i n g , da t ed 7 /29 /10P l a i n t i f f ' s Motion to D is q u a l i fy Judgere : Judge James Ba r tonEmergency Motion to D is q u a l i fy JudgeMar tha J . CookRevocab le I n t e r Vivos T r u s t Agreement(Re ta ined by G i l l e s p i e )A f f i d a v i t and I n v e n t o r y of P e r s o n a lPrope r ty of Ne i l J . G i l l e s p i e andD e s igna t e d Exemptions , May 16 , 2011N ot i c e o f Compliance

    PAGE

    1747

    47

    66

    9096

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    3/137

    1 The d e p o s i t i o n , upon o r a l examina t ion , o f2 NEIL J . GILLESPIE, t aken on t he 21s t day of J une ,3 2011, a t H i l l sbo rough County Cour thouse , F i f t h4 Floo r , 800 E as t Twiggs S t r e e t , Tampa, F l o r i d a ,5 beg inn ing a t 10:38 a .m . , be fo re Kimber ly Himes,6 Notary Publ ic in and fo r th e S t a t e o f F l o r i d a a t7 Large .8 ******9 NEIL J . GILLESPIE,

    10 be ing first du ly sworn to t e s t i f y to th e t r u t h , th e11 whole t r u t h , and no th ing b u t th e t r u t h , was examined12 and t e s t i f i e d as fo l low s :13 EXAMINATION14 BY MR. RODEMS:15 Q Good morning . Would you s t a t e your name16 fo r t he r eco rd , p l ea se?1718

    19 name?20

    2122

    AQ

    A

    QA

    23 3 4 4 81.24

    25

    QA

    N e i l G i l l e s p i e .And, Mr. G i l l e s p i e , what i s your middle

    J os eph .

    What i s your add re s s?8092 Southwes t 115th Loop, Oca la , F l o r i d a

    Do you have a t e l ephone a t t h a t add re s s?Yes.

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    4/137

    1

    2

    3

    45

    6

    78

    9

    10

    11

    12

    Q

    AQ

    AQ

    AQAQ

    AQ

    A

    What i s th e t e l e p h o n e number?(352) 854-7807.What i s your d a t e o f b i r t h ?March 1 9 t h , 1956 .What i s your S o c i a l S e c u r i t y number?160-52-5117 .Do you have a F l o r i d a d r i v e r ' s l i c e n s e ?Yes.Have you b r o u g h t t h a t w i t h you t oday?Yes .May I see it, p l e a s e ?(T e nde r i ng documen t . ) T h e r e ' s a copy o f

    13 it h e r e , t oo , if you want t h a t .Q Thank you . We w i l l go ahead and t a k e a4

    15 copy when we g e t t o the document p o r t i o n . The copy16 y o u ' v e made, i s it a comple t e copy o f th e f r o n t and17 back?18

    19

    AQ

    20 Pe rm i t ?21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    AQ

    AQA

    J u s t th e f r o n t .Okay. Do you have a Concea led Weapons

    Yes.Do you have a copy o f t h a t wi th you?No.Do you have it wi th you?No.

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    5/137

    1

    2

    3

    45

    QA

    Q

    AQ

    Y ou ' r e no t c a r ry in g it on your person?No.Okay.I d o n ' t even know if it's v a l i d anymore .Okay. Do you unde r s t and t h a t you a re

    6 under oa th today?78

    A

    QYes.Okay. Do you unde r s t and t h a t t h i s i s a

    9 d e p o s i t i o n i n connec t i on wi th a l a w s u i t you f i l e d10 s t y l e d G i l l e s p i e ve r sus B a r k e r , Rodems and Will iam11 J . Cook, Case Number: 05-CA-7205?12

    13

    A

    QYes.Do you unders t and t h a t a w r i t of b o d i ly

    14 a t t achmen t has been i s sued be c a us e o f your f a i l u r e15 to a ppe a r be fo re Judge Arno ld and show cause why yo16 s hou ld no t be he ld in contempt fo r f a i l i n g to appea17 fo r t h i s d e p o s i t i o n when p re v io u s ly no t i ced?18 A I d o n ' t r e a l l y unde r s t and a l l th e19 d e t a i l s , bu t t h a t sounds a bou t r i g h t .20 Q Okay. Have you t aken any p r e s c r i p t i o n21 medi ca t i ons wi th in the l a s t 24 hours?22

    23

    AQ

    Yes.Have you had any a l coho l i c beve rages - -

    24 have you consumed any a l coho l i c be ve ra ge s w i th in t h e25 l a s t 24 hours?

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    6/137

    1

    2

    AQ

    No.Have you i n g e s t e d any subs t ances o f any

    3 type in th e l a s t 24 hours t h a t would a f f e c t your4 a b i l i t y to remember?5

    6AQ

    No.Have you i n g e s t e d any subs t ances o f any

    7 type in th e l a s t 24 hour s t h a t would a f f e c t your8 a b i l i t y to unders t and t he Eng l i sh l anguage?9

    10

    11

    12

    I d o n ' t b e l i e v e so .Q Okay. I 'm no t g o i n ~ to ask you a bou t th e

    s p e c i f i c medi ca t i ons t h a t y o u ' r e on . Obvious ly , youknow what t hose med i ca t i ons a r e . Have t hey e v e r

    13 a f f e c t e d your a b i l i t y to remember in th e p a s t ?14 A I r e a l l y d o n ' t unde r s t and what a l l t h a t15 means .16

    17

    18

    Q

    A

    Okay.MR. CASTAGLIUOLO: Come on.I mean, do you want a list of th e

    19 medi ca t i ons?20

    21

    22

    23

    Q No, sir.MR. CASTAGLIUOLO: T h a t ' s n o t what he

    asked you.Q What I want to - - l e t me j u s t tell you

    24 where I 'm going , Mr. G i l l e s p i e , so you unde r s t and .25 I want to make su re t h a t you f u l l y unders t and my

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    7/137

    1 q u e s t i o n s today and t h a t I fu l l y unders t and your2 answers .3

    4

    A

    Q

    Uh-huh.So t h a t if it l a t e r appea r s t h a t you

    5 e i t h e r d id no t p rov i de me with a l l th e i n f o r m a t i o n6 r eques t ed o r i n t e n t i o n a l l y concea l ed i n f o r m a t i o n ,7 t h a t t he r e i s no exp lana t ion by you t h a t th e r e a s o n8 you c o u l d n ' t g i ve me t r u t h f u l answers i s be c a us e o f9 a p h y s i c a l o r menta l impa i rment o r because of be i ng

    10 under th e i n f l u e n c e of any s u b s t a n c e s , w he the r11 p r e s c r i p t i o n or non - p r e s c r i p t i on . So th e - - t h a t ' s12 th e purpos e of a sk i ng my q u e s t i o n .13 Are you fu l l y ab le - - and I'll r e p h ra s e14 it. Are you f u l l y able to unders t and my q u e s t i o n s15 today?16 A Wel l , with r ega rd to memory, I have17 spoken to my d o c t o r abou t ha v ing memory prob le m s ,18 e s p e c i a l l y s h o r t term and so f o r t h , and he says it's19 because o f d e p r e s s i o n .20

    21

    Q

    A

    Okay.Because t h e r e was some conce rn t h a t

    22 because my mother had Alzhe imer ' s , I t hough t maybe23 was showing e a r l y - - you know, s igns o f e a r l y o n s e t24 A l z h e i m e r ' s . My d o c t o r i s n o t a n e u r o l o g i s t . He i s25 a g e n e r a l p r a c t i t i o n e r , I guess , and he s a id t h a t it

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    8/137

    1 would be because of d e p r e s s i o n .2 Q A ll r i g h t . I f a t any t ime my ques t ion to3 you isn't c l e a r , would you ask me to r eph rase it,4 p l e a s e ?5

    6

    A

    QYes.Okay. Do you have any phys ica l

    7 impa i rmen t s t h a t would a f f e c t your a b i l i t y to8 remember?9

    10

    11

    12

    AQAQ

    I s u f f e r ed a t r a u m a t i c br a i n i n j u r y .Recen t l y o r - -In 1988.Okay. And does t h a t a f f e c t , to your

    13 knowledge , your a b i l i t y to remember?14 A I d o n ' t know about cause and e f f e c t - -15 Q Okay.16 A - - about s p e c i f i c t h i ngs .

    Q A ll r i g h t . Do you have any medica l718 c o n d i t i o n s t h a t y o u ' r e aware o f you d o n ' t have to19 d i s c l o s e them to me, b u t do you have any medica l20 c o n d i t i o n s t h a t y o u ' r e aware o f t h a t would a f f e c t21 your a b i l i t y to remember?22

    23

    A I have medica l c o n d i t i o n s , and a r e p o r twas submi t t ed . I th ink you have a copy o f it. And

    24 I t h in k I answered t h a t my d o c t o r says depres s ion25 a f f e c t s th e a b i l i t y to remember.

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    9/137

    1

    2

    3 2 0 1 1 .

    45

    6

    78

    QA

    QAQAQ

    9 Dr. Huffe r?10 A

    Okay. Which r e p o r t a re you r e f e r r i n g to ?The one t h a t I prov i ded you on May 27 t h ,

    Was t h a t by a medica l doc t o r?T ha t ' s by Dr. Kar in Huffe r - Okay.- - in c o n j u n c t i o n with my medica l d o c to rOkay. Have you e v e r been examined by

    Not in p e r s o n . T h e re ' s - - th e re was som11 t e s t i n g and so f o r t h .12

    13

    14

    QA

    Q15 gradua t e?16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    2122

    23

    24

    25

    AQAQA

    QAQAQ

    Have you e v e r met h e r in person?No.Okay. A ll r i g h t .

    Yes.Col l e ge gradua t e?Yes.

    Y ou ' r e a h i gh schoo l

    Okay.No.

    Are you m a r r i e d?

    Have you e v e r been m a r r i e d?No.Do you have any ch i ld ren?No.Do you have any b ro th e r s o r s i s t e r s ?

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    10/137

    1

    23

    4

    5

    67

    A

    Q

    A

    QA

    QA

    I have one b r o t h e r and one s i s t e r .And what i s your b r o t h e r ' s name?Mark G i l l e s p i e .And where does Mr. Mark G i l l e s p i e l i ve?In For t Worth, Texas .Do you have h is s t r e e t address?I c a n ' t remember it r i g h t now. Meadow

    8 Oak someth ing Dr ive maybe.9

    10

    Q

    AMeadow Oak?I r e a l l y c a n ' t remember th e s t r e e t

    11 a d d r e s s r i g h t now.12 Q Okay. Do you have a t e l ephone number fo13 Mr. Mark G i l l e s p i e?14

    15

    AQ

    Not in memory.When i s th e l a s t t ime t h a t you spoke with

    16 Mark G i l l e s p i e?1718

    A

    Q

    Probably wi th in th e l a s t week o r so .And I b e l i e v e you t e s t i f i e d you had a

    19 s i s t e r , as w e l l ?20

    21

    22

    232425

    A

    QAQAQ

    Yes.And what i s your sister's name?E l i z a b e th Ba ur l e y .Can you s p e l l th e l a s t name, p l e a s e ?B - a - u - r - 1 - e - y .And i s - - where does Ms. Baur ley l i ve?

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    11/137

    1 A I d o n ' t have h e r p r e s e n t a d d r e s s . I2 b e l i e v e it 's in th e Chicago a r e a .3 Do you have a t e l e p h o n e number fo r her?

    A5 Q When i s th e l a s t t ime you spoke to her?6 A I h a v e n ' t spoken to h e r fo r q u i t e some7 t i m e .8 Q More t ha n a year?9 A Yes.

    10 Q More t ha n f i v e yea r s?11 A I d o n ' t remember .12 Q Have you e v e r b een a r r e s t e d ?13 A Can you e x p l a i n t h a t q u e s t i o n more? I14 mean t h i s t oday? Th i s i n c i d e n t w i th t h i s15 i n c a r c e r a t i o n t o d a y , does t h a t coun t?16 Q L e t ' s d e a l w i th p r i o r to t o d a y ' s d a t e ,17 which i s June 2 1 s t , 2011.18 A There was an a r r e s t a l ong t ime ago . I19 d o n ' t remember th e d a t e , and no t h i ng came o f it.20 Q Okay. What was it fo r ?21 A I - - I t h i n k it might have been fo r22 s o l i c i t a t i o n .23 Q S o l i c i t a t i o n o f what?24 A P r o s t i t u t i o n .25 Q Was t h a t w i t h i n th e l a s t f i v e y e a r s ?

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    12/137

    1

    2

    AQ

    No.Okay. Have you eve r been charged by a

    3 f e d e r a l o r s t a t e p ro s e c u to r with a cr ime?4 A No. I mean, n o t - - n o t to my5 unde r s t and ing o f t h i ngs .6 Q7 f e lony?8

    9

    A

    Q

    Okay. Have you eve r been conv ic t ed of a

    No.Have you eve r been conv ic t ed of a c r ime

    10 i nvo lv ing d i shones ty?No.11

    12

    AQ And when I use t he ph ra se " d i s h o n e s ty , "

    13 mean such th ings as f r a u d , p e r j u r y , l a r ceny , u s ing14 f a l se name with a law enforcement o f f i c e r . Anyth in15 of t hose types?16

    17

    AQ

    I ' v e ne ve r been conv ic t ed o f a n y t h i n g .A ll r i g h t . I want to s t a r t with any

    18 l a w s u i t s t h a t you c u r r e n t l y have pending a g a i n s t an19 person o r e n t i t y fo r money damages . I 'm n o t20 focus i ng on th ings where you may be seek i ng j u s t21 i n j u n c t i v e r e l i e f , b u t we w i l l c ove r t h o s e .22 But fo r a moment, do you have any23 l a w s u i t s pending where you a re seek i ng money damage24 from any person o r e n t i t y ?25 A I 'm su i ng your f irm and your law p a r t n e r

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    13/137

    Uh-huh. Anyone e l s e ?2

    QA There i s a f e d e r a l l awsu i t i nvo l v i ng t h i s

    3 l i t i g a t i o n .4 Q I s t h a t th e l awsu i t that's pend ing in th e5 Uni ted S t a t e s Di s t r i c t Cour t in Marion County?6

    7AQ

    Yes.Okay. I s t h a t th e l awsu i t where you

    8 pe r sona l l y named me and t hen d i smi ssed me from i t ?9

    10

    AQ

    Yes.Okay. I 'm f am i l i a r wi th bo th o f t ho s e .

    11 Do you cu r r en t l y have pend ing any o th e r l awsu i t s o f12 any t ype where you a re s u i ng someone fo r money13 damages?14

    15

    AQ

    No.Okay. Are you c u r r e n t l y a de f endan t in

    16 any l awsu i t ?17

    18

    AQ

    No.Okay. Do you cu r r en t l y have any l awsu i t

    19 pend ing ag a i n s t any pe r son o r en t i t y seek ing on ly20 i n j u n c t i v e r e l i e f o r equ i t a b l e r e l i e f ?21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    A

    QAQ

    I don ' t t h i nk t h e r e ' s any o th e r l awsu i t s

    Okay- - pe r i o d .I be l i eve somewhere I r e ad an i nven to ry

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    14/137

    1 of your p ro p e r ty , and you p laced a va l ue on what you2 be l i eve th e f e d e ra l l a w s u i t i s wor th . Do you r e c a l3 doing t h a t , p la c in g a va l ue on what you b e l i e v e th e4 f e d e r a l l a w s u i t i s worth?5 A Y o u ' l l have to r e f r e s h my memory. I6 d o n ' t know r e a l l y what y o u ' r e speak i ng abou t .7 Q Have you done an i n v e n t o r y o f your8 p ro p e r ty in connec t i on wi th my e f f o r t s to c o l l e c t o9 th e judgment?

    10

    11

    12

    AQ

    I 'm s o r ry .Yes, s i r .

    Can you r e p e a t t he ques t ion?

    Have you done an i n v e n t o r y o f your13 p ro p e r ty in connec t i on wi th my e f f o r t s to c o l l e c t o14 t h i s judgment?15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    A Yes. I th ink it was done in May.THE WITNESS:

    to g e t i t ?It's h e r e . Do you want me

    MR. CASTAGLIUOLO: H e ' l l ask you to g e tit if he needs it.Q I have a document which I'll show you in

    a moment, b u t I'll read what it i s . It's a Not ice22 of F i l i n g an " A f f id a v i t And Inven to ry Of Per sona l23 Prope r ty Of Nei l J . G i l l e s p i e And Des i gna t ed24 Exempt ions , Amended, " and it's da ted Ju ly 2 9 t h ,25 2 0 1 0 , and - -

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    15/137

    1

    2

    3

    A T h e re ' s a more r e c e n t one than t h a t .Q Okay. Well , I would l i ke to ask you:

    Was t h i s document and we ' r e go ing to go ahead an4 mark t h i s as E x h i b i t 1 .5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    MR. RODEMS: I d o n ' t have a copy fo r youMr. - - and I 'm going to j u s t c a l l you Mr. Geneif t h a t ' s all r i g h t , because I 'm stills t r ugg l i ng with th e p r o p e r p ro n u n c i a t i o n .

    MR. CASTAGLIUOLO: You can c a l l meMr. C. It migh t be e a s i e r fo r - -

    MR. RODEMS: Mr. C.MR. CASTAGLIUOLO: t h i s l ady .MR. RODEMS: Yes, sir. Okay.MR. CASTAGLIUOLO: Does t h i s look l i k e

    t h i s i s th e new one?THE WITNESS: Well , t h i s one, I t h in k ,

    was from l a s t y e a r .MR. CASTAGLIUOLO: Well , t h a t ' s what he

    s a i d .THE WITNESS: This i s from Ju ly 29 t h ,

    2010. T h e re ' s one from May 2011.MR. CASTAGLIUOLO: I f th e one in May,

    does it i n c o rp o ra t e eve ry th ing t h a t ' s in t h i sone, o r i s it d i f f e r e n t ?

    THE WITNESS: It's - - t h e r e ' s a lo t o f

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    16/137

    1

    234

    5

    67

    89

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    t h in g s t h a t a re th e same. This i s d i f f e r e n t .This some of th e th ings a re d i f f e r e n t , b u t

    t h e r e was - - Mr. Rodems had g a r n i s h e dsome funds , and then th e funds were r e tu rn e dto me. I t h in k t h a t ' s probab l y th e b i g g e s td i f f e r e n c e .

    MR. CASTAGLIUOLO: Why d o n ' t you j u s t ber e spons ive to h is ques t ions?

    I 'm s o r ry , Mr. Rodems.t ake your s t age .

    I d i d n ' t mean to

    MR. RODEMS: No, no, n o t a t all. I meanth e purpose of today i s t o g a th e r i n f o r m a t i o n ,and I r e a l l y d o n ' t have any prob lems wi th youa s s i s t i n g Mr. G i l l e s p i e as needed . O bvious ly ,if th e two of you need t o c o n f e r p r i v a t e l y , wecan a r r ange to t ake a break and

    THE WITNESS: Do you have a - - I 'ms o r ry .

    MR. RODEMS: Go ahead .20 BY MR. RODEMS:21 Q My ques t ion - - I th ink if we come back to22 th e q u e s t i o n , then maybe we can move fo rward - - i s :23 was t h i s a f f i d a v i t submi t t ed by you?24

    25

    AQ

    Yes.And was it submi t t ed under oa th?

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    17/137

    1

    234

    56

    A

    QA

    Yes.Okay. May I have t h a t back , p l e a s e .(Tender ing document . )MR. RODEMS: Do you have s t i c k e r s ?THE REPORTER: Yes.MR. RODEMS: I'll go ahead and p u t t h i s

    7 on h e r e .8 (Ex h ib i t 1 marked fo r i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . )9 BY MR. RODEMS:

    10 Q A ll r i g h t . Mr. G i l l e s p i e , I b e l i e v e11 E x h i b i t 1 r e f l e c t s t h a t you v a lu e "Choses in ac t ion"12 - - Paragraph 6(g) Page 2 "Gi l l e sp i e v . T h i r t e e n t h13 J u d i c i a l C i r c u i t , e t a l" a t $5 .00 .14

    15

    A No, I d i d n ' t va lue them a t t h a t . Youva lued them a t t h a t . I f you - - may I r e f e r back to

    16 th e document?17

    18

    QA

    Yes, s i r , p l e a s e do.It says r i g h t h e r e , "Mr. Rodems and

    19 B arke r , Rodems & Cook e s t a b l i s h e d a va lue fo r th e20 choses in a c t i o n of l e s s than FIVE DOLLARS, see21 Defendan t s ' Motion For Proceed ings Supplementary to22 E xecu t ion , submi t ted Ju ly 1 2 th , 2010."23 Q Okay. Do you have any reason to b e l i e v e24 t h a t th e va lue o f $5.00 i s i n a c c u r a t e ?25 A I p u t t h a t in t h e r e because t h a t ' s what

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    18/137

    1 va l ue you p u t on it. I d o n ' t a c t u a l l y know th e2 va l ue o f it.34

    5

    6

    Q Well , Paragraph 6 says , quote - - and t h ii s - - t h i s i s your a f f i d a v i t . Correc t ?

    Yes.Q - - th e a f f i d a v i t you w ro te .

    This i s - -

    Parag raph 67 says , quo t e , The fo l l owi ng i nven to ry c o n t a in s a t r u8 and c o r r e c t schedu l e o f a l l p e r s o n a l p ro p e r ty owned9 by me in th e s t a t e o f Flo r ida , inc lud ing its f a i r

    10 marke t va lue , c lo s e quo t e .11 And then you list a t h rough g, and g i s12 "Choses in a c t i o n , G i l l e s p i e v. T h i r t e e n th J u d i c i a l

    C i r c u i t , e t al.," and $5.00 i s p laced t h e r e . So314 what I 'm t r y i ng to de te rm ine i s : I s t h a t what you15 be l i eve th e f a i r marke t va l ue of t hose choses of16 ac t i on to be?17 A I d o n ' t know what th e va l ue i s . I r e l i e d18 upon your s t a t e m e n t , and now t h a t I 'm s i t t i n g he re19 th ink ing a bou t it, I d o n ' t even know if t h a t ' s20 c o n s i d e r e d p e r s o n a l p ro p e r ty .21

    22

    23

    QAQ

    Okay.I mean, t h a t to me i s a l e g a l q u e s t i o n .Did you p l a c e anywhere in t h i s Parag raph

    24 6 t h a t you w e re n ' t c e r t a i n whether o r no t t h i s was25 pe r sona l p rope r ty?

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    19/137

    1

    2

    34

    5

    6

    78

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    AQ

    you?AQ

    At h a t

    Q

    AQA

    v a lu e .Q

    No.You d i d n ' t q u a l i f y it in any way, d id

    Well , l e t me look a t it a g a in .Yes, s i r .Your q u e s t i o n i s abou t Paragraph 6? I s

    Paragraph 6 o f your a f f i d a v i t , y e s , sir.It's l i s t e d a t $5 .00 .Okay.And I r e l i e d upon your as se s smen t o f th e

    And what a re th e c u r r e n t pending c la ims14 in t h a t l i t i g a t i o n ?15 A Well , it's a - - a C i v i l R igh t s and16 Americans wi th D i s a b i l i t i e s Act l a ws u i t .17 Q And a re t h e r e a l s o c la ims a g a i n s t Rober t18 Bauer?

    Yes.1920

    AQ And th e c la ims a g a i n s t Mr. Bauer , do the

    21 i n c lu d e c la ims fo r l e g a l malprac t i ce?22

    23AQ

    No.Do they in c lu d e c la ims t h a t Mr. Bauer ha

    24 somehow commit ted a t o r t a g a i n s t you?25 A As I r e c a l l , th e l a ws u i t i s strictly

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    20/137

    1 C i v i l Righ t s and Americans w i th D i s a b i l i t i e s Act .2 Q Okay. Do you know o f any r eason t h a t3 t h a t c i v i l a c t i o n canno t be a s s i g n e d to my c l i e n t s4 fo r p u rp o se s o f s a t i s f y i n g my client's j udgment5 a g a i n s t you?

    Can you r e p e a t t h a t ?7

    AQ Yes, sir. Do you know o f any r e a s o n t h a

    8 t h a t cause o f a c t i o n that's p e n d i n g in th e U n i t e d9 S t a t e s D i s t r i c t Cour t in Marion County c a nno t be

    10 a s s i g n e d by you to my c l i e n t s in s a t i s f a c t i o n o r11 p a r t i a l s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e i r j udgment a g a i n s t you?12 A Wel l , I mean that's a l e g a l q u e s t i o n , I13 t h i n k , and it would seem to me t h a t it's w i t h i n th e14 - - I c a n ' t t h i n k o f th e word r i g h t now. It comes15 under one o f th e exemp t ions , because o f th e amount16 o f money.17 Q Okay. A ll r i g h t . Do you - - a re you18 c u r r e n t l y aware o f any c l a im s t h a t you have a g a i n s t19 any i n d i v i d u a l o r e n t i t y fo r money damages t h a t h as20 n o t been s u b m i t t e d in th e form o f a l a w s u i t ?21

    22AQ

    I d o n ' t r e a l l y u n d e r s t a n d t h a t q u e s t i o n .Okay. You b e l i e v e d a t one t ime t h a t you

    23 had c l a im s a g a i n s t my law f i rm and a g a i n s t my24

    25

    p a r t n e r B i l l Cook. Cor re c t ?A Yes. And a g a i n s t you and Mr. B a rk e r a s

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    21/137

    1 shown in P l a i n t i f f ' s F i r s t Amended Compla in t .2 Q Okay. And a t some po in t you f i l e d t hose3 c la ims in th e form o f a l awsu i t in th e Th i r t e en t h4

    5

    6

    Jud i c i a l Ci r cu i t .AQ

    Yes.Okay.

    Correc t ?

    Do you - - a re you aware o f any7 c la ims t h a t you have r i gh t now aga i n s t any pe r son o8 en t i t y t h a t you have no t f i l e d in a l awsu i t ?9 A Tha t r e a l l y i s a l e g a l ques t ion t h a t I -

    10 I don ' t know how to answer .11 Q Okay. Do you be l i eve t h a t any pe r son ha12 wronged you so t h a t you have a l e g a l r i g h t to sue13 t h a t person fo r money damages?14 A Tha t ' s a broad que s t i on . I - - I r e a l l y15 don ' t unde r s t and .16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    MR. CASTAGLIUOLO: Can we go o f f th er eco rd a second?

    MR. RODEMS: Sure .(D i scuss ion o f f th e r e co rd . )MR. RODEMS: Le t ' s go back on th e

    r e co rd , p l e a s e .22 BY MR. RODEMS:23

    24

    Q A ll r i gh t . We had a ques t ion pend ing ,and t hen we took a break o f f th e reco rd . Do you - -

    25 a re you prepa red to answer th e que s t i on ,

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    22/137

    1 Mr. G i l l e s p i e?2

    34

    5

    678

    A Yes.MR. RODEMS: A ll r i g h t . L e t ' s go back ,

    and if I cou l d , Ms. Cour t Repor t e r , cou l d youp le a s e r ead back th e ques t ion so t h a t w e ' r ec l ea r ?

    A(Repor t e r reads as r e q u e s t e d . )There may be , b u t I r e a l l y d o n ' t

    9 a n t i c i p a t e any l i t i g a t i o n .10 BY MR. RODEMS:11 Q Okay. L et me give you some examples .12 Have you been in a c a r a c c i d e n t t h a t you b e l i e v e wa13 th e f a u l t o f someone e l s e t h a t you b e l i e v e you have14 a c la im fo r i n j u r i e s to y o u r s e l f o r damage to your15 prope r ty?16 A No. And I might be wrong in17 v o lu n t e e r in g , b u t any c la ims I would have a re18

    19

    20

    a g a i n s t you and your f i rm . No one e l s e t h a t I canth ink o f . And - - and t h i s cour t p roces s .

    Q Okay. Well , what I 'm t r y i n g to f i n d o u t21 i s whether you have any p o s s i b i l i t y o f r e c o v e r i n g22 any money from o t h e r pe op le so t h a t I may t ake the23 necessa ry ac t i ons to p r o t e c t my c l i e n t s ' i n t e r e s t b24 en fo rc ing t h e i r judgment . T ha t ' s th e r eason I 'm25 ask i ng you t h e s e q u e s t i o n s .

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    23/137

    1 So if, fo r example us ing th e c a r2 acc iden t example , if you were in an acc iden t l a s t3 week and you broke your foo t and you a n t i c i p a t e d4 making a claim a g a i n s t th e o t h e r d r i v e r o r b e l i e v e d5 you may have a claim a g a i n s t th e o t h e r d r i v e r , t h a t6 would be th e r eason fo r me ask i ng t h e s e q u e s t i o n s ,7 and

    Well , I h a v e n ' t been in a ca r acc i den t .Okay.

    8

    9

    10

    AQ

    A I would say t h a t some yea r s ago t he r e wa11 an i n c i d e n t a t th e U n iv e r s i t y o f F lo r id a V e t e r i n a ry12 School where I be l i eve and o th e r s b e l i e v e t h a t t hey13 m is t r e a t e d a p e t , b u t I 'm n o t br ing ing any l aw s u i t .14 Q15 Flu f fy?16

    17

    AQ

    I be l i eve t h a t was your r a b b i t named

    T h a t ' s r i g h t .Okay. And t h a t was more t han fou r y e a r s

    18 ago. Correc t ?19 A It was some t ime ago .20 Q Yes, s i r . Okay. A ll r i g h t . Do you21 b e l i e v e t h a t anyone has commit ted neg l i gence a g a i n s22 you in th e l a s t fou r yea r s so t h a t you may r ecove r23 money damages from a person o r e n t i t y ? And l e t me24 d e f in e . Negl igence being th e f a i l u r e to u se25 r ea sonab le ca re caus i ng i n j u r y to you o r damage to

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    24/137

    1 y o u r p r o p e r t y .2 A Noth ing t h a t I can t h i n k o f o u t s i d e t h i s3 l a w s u i t .4 Q Okay. A ll r i g h t . Wel l , fo r p u r p o s e s o f5 t h i s q u e s t i o n , I am aware and you - - you a re f r e e to6 answer th e q u e s t i o n however you f e e l a p p r o p r i a t e ,7 b u t you d o n ' t need t o r e p e a t t h i s l a w s u i t o r th e8 l a w s u i t pend ing i n f e d e r a l c o u r t in Marion County .9 I f you wish to , that's f i n e , b u t I 'm f u l l y aware o f

    10 t h o s e .11 Do you b e l i e v e t h a t someone in c o n n e c t i o12 with t h i s l a w s u i t h as f a i l e d to u se r e a s o n a b l e c a r e13 and c a u se d you p e r s o n a l i n j u r y o r damage to y o u r14 p r o p e r t y ?15 A Wel l , that's a l e g a l q u e s t i o n , and I16 d o n ' t q u i t e unders t and t hose t e r ms in th e way t h a t17 you u n d e r s t a n d them.18

    19

    QA

    Okay.But I b e l i e v e t h a t Mr. Bauer was

    20 n e g l i g e n t in th e h a n d l i n g o f my r e p r e s e n t a t i o n .21 Q Mr. G i l l e s p i e , isn't it c o r r e c t t h a t a t22 th e t ime t h a t Mr. Baue r e n t e r e d a n o t i c e o f23 a p p e a ra n c e in t h i s a c t i o n , you had d i s m i s s e d all o f24 y o u r c la ims a g a i n s t Ba rke r , Rodems & Cook and25 Wil l iam J . Cook?

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    25/137

    1 A My unders t and i ng was t h a t t hos e2 d i s m i s s a l s were o f no e f f e c t b e c a u se you mai n t a i ned3 a c o u n t e r - c l a i m , and t h a t i s u l t i m a t e l y what th e4 Second D i s t r i c t Cour t o f Appea l h e l d . Had you5 dropped y o u r c o u n t e r - c l a i m a t t h a t p o i n t in 2007 th6 l a w s u i t woul d have ended .7 Q Okay. Wel l , let me go back . At th e t im8 t h a t Mr. Bauer e n t e r e d h i s n o t i c e o f a ppe a ra nc e ,9 isn't it c o r r e c t t h a t you had d i smi ssed y o u r c l a im s

    10

    11

    A They were d i s m i s s e d , and t hen a weekl a t e r I withdrew th e d i s m i s s a l . So it's my

    12 u n d e r s t a n d i n g t h a t t he y were n o t d i s m i s s e d .13 Q And isn't it t r u e t h a t Mr. Bauer was th e14 a t t o r n e y o f r e c o r d f o r you a t th e t ime t h a t y o u r15 d i s m i s s a l s were cha l l enged by my c l i e n t s in th e16 trial c o u r t and t he n in th e Second D i s t r i c t C o u r t o17 Appeal?

    A Yes.Q Okay. And Mr. Baue r was s u c c e s s f u l in

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    m a i n t a i n i n g t h e r e v i v a l o f your c l a i m s . C o r r e c t ?AQ

    Yes, and - - and he adv i sed t h a t .Okay. So what I 'm t r y i ng to f i g u r e o u t

    23 i s what do you b e l i e v e Mr. Bauer d id t h a t was24 n e g l i g e n t i n th e h a n d l i n g o f y o u r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n ?25 A Again , t h a t ' s a - - I d o n ' t know how to

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    26/137

    1 re spond in a l e g a l sense to t h a t q u e s t i o n .2

    3Q A ll r i g h t . Then l e ave as ide l e g a l f o r a

    moment and j u s t tell me. What do you t h in k4 Mr. Bauer d id wrong in r ep r e s en t i ng you?5 A I , you know, would need t ime to sit down6 and p u t t h a t down on p a p e r to have any t h i ng7 comprehens ive .

    Okay.But - S o r r y .

    And you 've neve r - -AQA But I - - I would say t h a t you a re aware

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12 of t he ba r c om pla in t t h a t I made a g a i n s t him. And13 th ink t h a t b a r c om pla in t s e t s fo r th a number of14 i s s u e s t h a t I t h in k were prob lems t h a t he made.

    Q Okay. I s t he r e any t h i ng t h a t you b e l i e vt h a t Mr. Bauer d id wrong t h a t you d id n o t i n c l u d e inyour b a r g r i evance a g a i n s t him?

    A Proba b ly .

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    Q I 'm s o r ry . Would you p le a s e r e p e a t whatyour l a s t

    AQ

    answer was?Proba b ly .Okay. And as you sit here t oday , a re yo

    23 ab le to r e c a l l any t h i ng s p e c i f i c a l l y t h a t Mr. Bauer24 d id t h a t you f e e l t h a t was wrong t h a t you d id n o t25 i nc lude in your b a r gr i evance?

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    27/137

    1 A Wel l , I would sa y as a g e n e r a l - - j u s t2 g e n e ra l l y I t h i n k it was - - he gave me bad l e g a l3 a dv ic e to su e you t o r e - - re - - to , I g u e s s - - to4 p ro c e e d th e way he d id if he had no i n t e n t i o n o f5 see i ng it t h rough to th e end .6 Q And d id you n o t i n c l u d e what you 've j u s t7 t o l d me in y o u r b a r g r i e v a n c e fo r any p a r t i c u l a r8 reason?9

    10

    AQ

    I d o n ' t unders t and what you j u s t a s ke d .Okay. My q u e s t i o n was c ou ld you tell me

    11 a ny th ing - - and I 'm p a r a p h r a s i n g my q u e s t i o n - -12 cou ld you tell me a n y t h i n g t h a t you d id n o t i n c l u d e13 in y o u r b a r g r i e v a n c e a g a i n s t Mr. Bauer t h a t you14 t h ink he d id wrong, and what you j u s t r e l a t e d to me15 which t h e c o u r t r e p o r t e r t ook down, and my fo l l ow -up16 q u e s t i o n was: I s t h e r e any r eason t h a t you d id n o t17 i n c l u d e t h a t f a c t o r t h a t a l l e g a t i o n in your b a r18 gr i e va nc e ?19 A20 g r i e v a n c e .21

    22

    QA

    I b e l i e v e t h a t was p a r t of t he b a r

    Okay.The b a r g r i e v a n c e , as I r e c a l l , was a b o u

    23 18 p ag es - - th e initial 17 o r 18 pa ge s , so I c a n ' t24 sit h e r e and r e c i t e e v e r y t h i n g from t h a t .25 Q I u n d e r s t a n d . But my s p e c i f i c q u e s t i o n

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    28/137

    1 i s : I s t h e r e a n y t h i n g t h a t you can t h i n k o f t h a t2 Mr. Bauer d id wrong t h a t you d id n o t i n c l u d e in y o u3 b a r gr i e va nc e ?4

    5AQ

    Noth ing I can t h i n k o f r i g h t now.Okay. And a t th e t ime t h a t you p r e p a r e d

    6 your b a r g r i e v a n c e , was it your i n t e n t i o n to a d v i s e7 th e F l o r i d a Bar o f e v e r y t h i n g t h a t you b e l i e v e d t h a8 Mr. Bauer d id wrong?9 A I - - I meant it as a co mp r eh en s iv e

    10 c o m p l a i n t .11 Q Did you i n t e n d , a t th e t ime you submi t t e12 a b a r g r i e v a n c e a g a i n s t Mr. B au e r , to n o t d i s c l o s e13 any i n f o r m a t i o n abou t Mr. B a u e r ' s wrongdo ing?14

    15

    16

    17

    AQAQ

    No.Okay.I mean - - no .So you i n t ended your b a r g r i e v a n c e t o be

    18 co mp le t e and comprehens ive?19

    20

    AQ

    Yes.Okay. Have you been th e v ic t im in th e

    21 l a s t f o u r y e a r s o f an a s s a u l t , which i s th e t h r e a t22 o f th e u se o f p h y s i c a l f o r c e a g a i n s t your w i l l o r23 d e s i r e ?24

    25

    AQ

    So th e l a s t fou r yea r s?Would t a ke us back - - and t h e r e a s o n I

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    29/137

    1 ask a bou t fou r yea r s i s because t h a t would be th e2 s t a t u t e o f l i m i t a t i o n s fo r a c i v i l ac t i on , which I 'm3 n o t t e l l i n g you t h a t so t h a t you can e i t h e r agree o4 d i s a g re e .5 I 'm6

    7

    A

    Q

    I 'm g iv ing you t h a t as a bas i s f o r why

    I c a n ' t th ink o f any t h i ng , no.A ll r i g h t . And dur i ng th e l a s t fou r

    8 y e a r s , have you been p h y s i c a l l y c o n t a c t e d a bou t you9 person? H i t , s t r uck , punched, kicked? Any type of

    10 p h y s i c a l c o n t a c t wi t hou t your consen t w i th in th e11 l a s t fou r y e a r s by any person?12 A Not t h a t I can th ink o f .13

    14

    15

    Q A ll r i g h t . Are you aware if w i th in th el a s t two yea r s s t r i k e t h a t .

    Within th e l a s t two y e a r s , has any pe r so16 o r e n t i t y made a f a l s e s t a t e m e n t , o r a l o r w r i t t e n ,17 about you?18 A Can you r e p e a t t h a t ques t ion?19 Q Yes. Within th e l a s t two y e a r s - - so20 going back to June 2 1 s t o f 2009 - - has any pe r son o21 e n t i t y made a f a l s e s t a t e m e n t , o r a l o r w r i t t e n ,22 abou t you?2324

    25

    AQA

    Yes.Okay.You.

    And who would t h a t be?

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    30/137

    1 Q Okay. Anyth ing o u t s id e o f th e c o u r t2 p r o c e e d i n g s t h a t you b e l i e v e c o n s t i t u t e d a f a l s e3 s t a t e m e n t a b o u t you?4 A Are you i n c l u d i n g in t h a t Mr. B au e r and5 h is b a r c o m p l a i n t ?6 Q Yes .7 Anything o u t s id e o f t h i s l e g a l8 p r o c e e d i n g , which i s th e c a s e you f i l e d a g a i n s t9 Ba rke r , Rodems & Cook, P.A. and Wil l iam J . Cook, an

    10 th e f e d e r a l c o u r t p r o c e e d i n g which you f i l e d in11 Marion County? Anyth ing o u t s id e o f t hose12 p r o c e e d i n g s where you b e l i e v e any pe r s on h as made a13 f a l s e s t a t e m e n t abou t you w i t h i n th e l a s t two y e a r s14 A Well , t h a t d o e s n ' t i nc l ude t he b a r15 c om pla in t t h e n .16 Q Okay. What b a r c om pla in t a re you17 r e f e r r i n g to ?18

    19

    AQ

    A ga ins t Mr. B au e r .Righ t . I 'm n o t my q u e s t i o n i s : Do

    20 you b e l i e v e any p e r s o n h as made f a l s e s t a t e m e n t s21

    22

    23

    24

    a b o u t you w i t h i n th e l a s t two ye a r s ? L e t ' s startw i th t h a t , and t he n we can work backwards . Youi d e n t i f i e d me. Any o t h e r p e r so n ?

    A I t h i n k t h e r e were f a l s e s t a t e m e n t s in25 th e b a r c om pla in t .

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    31/137

    1 Q Okay. Why d id you make f a l s e s t a t emen t s2 in th e b a r compla in t ?34 them.5

    678

    A

    QAQA

    I d i d n ' t make them. Othe r peop l e made

    Well , who f i l e d th e ba r compla in t ?I d id . In t h e i r r e s pons e sOkay. I unde r s t and .- - wi th th e ba r compla in t in r e sponse to

    9 my ba r comp l a i n t .10 Q Okay. Who do you be l i e v e made f a l s e11 s t a t emen t s in r e sponse to your ba r compla in t ?12

    13

    A Well , th e one t h a t I - - I t h i nk o f i s th eo f f i c e manager t h a t made an a f f i d a v i t . I c a n ' t

    14 r e c a l l he r name r i g h t now.15 Q Okay. Can you t h i nk o f any o th e r16 occas ion t h a t any pe r son o r e n t i t y has made a f a l s e17 s t a t emen t abou t you wi th i n th e l a s t two yea r s ?18

    19

    AQ

    No.So you ' ve i d en t i f i e d me as a r e s u l t o f m

    20 r e sponse to th e F l o r i d a Bar in connec t i on wi th you r21

    2223

    ba r g r i e vanc e ag a i n s t Mr. Baue r . I s t h a t co r r e c t ?A And t hen t h i s l awsu i t .Q And you be l i e v e I ' v e made f a l s e

    24 s t a t emen t s in t h i s l awsu i t ?25 A And you made f a l s e s t a t emen t s to Pedro

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    32/137

    1 Bajo , th e Chai rman of th e T hi r t een t h J u d i c i a l2 C i r c u i t Nominat ing Commission. And in c o n j u n c t i o n3 with th e b a r c om pla in t a g a i n s t Mr. Bauer , I t h in k4

    5

    you wrote a 13-page what I would c a l l a d i a t r i b e- - a g a in s t me. And t h e r e may have been o t h e r

    6 t h in g s , too , t h a t I 'm no t aware o f .7 Q Okay. So you b e l i e v e t h a t I have made8 f a l s e s t a t e m e n t s a g a in s t you in connec t i on w i t h you9 ba r g r i evance a g a i n s t Mr. Bauer , t h i s l a w s u i t and,

    10 t h i r d , you be l i eve - - o r s t r i k e t h a t . And th e o t h e11 person t h a t you b e l i e v e has made f a l s e s ta temen ts12 a bou t you with in th e l a s t two yea r s i s Mr. Baue r ' s13 o f f i c e manager?14

    15

    16

    AQA

    Yes.Okay.And I a l so th ink you made f a l s e

    17 s t a t e m e n t s in th e f e d e ra l l aw s u i t .18 Q Okay. Are you f a m i l i a r with th e term19 " invas ion of pr ivacy"?20

    21

    AQ

    Somewhat.Okay. Have you e v e r f i l e d a l a w s u i t

    22 a g a i n s t anyone fo r i nvas ion of p r i vacy?23 A I sued you and your law p a r t n e r s and you24 law f i rm fo r i nvas ion of pr ivacy , I be l i eve , i n25 P l a i n t i f f ' s F i r s t Amended Compla in t .

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    33/137

    1 Q By the way, j u s t fo r t he r eco rd , t he2 F i r s t Amended Compla int was no t accep ted fo r f i l i n g3 by Judge Cook, was i t ?4 A I d o n ' t - - it was accep ted by Judge5 B ar ton , and he s p e c i f i c a l l y s a i d , "You can f i l e it67

    in the c ou r t r e c o r d . " T h a t ' s in th e t r a n s c r i p t .Q Okay. I b e l i e v e a t th e t ime t h a t Judge

    8 Bar ton made t h a t comment, you had not prepa red a9 mot ion fo r l eave to f i l e an amended compla in t , had

    10 you?A Yes, I had . Tha t was on March th e 5 th ,1

    12

    13

    2 0 1 0 . You and I s tood be fo re Judge B ar ton , and Ihad th e mot ion . He read it and he s a i d , "You may

    14 f i l e t h i s w i th th e c l e rk of th e c o u r t , " and I d id15 so .16 Q And d id you eve r c a l l t h a t mot ion up fo r17 a hear ing?18 A Judge - - I c a n ' t r e c a l l whether it was19 what the s t a t u s of th e c a l l i n g fo r a hear ing was,20 becaus e th e same day t h a t t h a t occu r r ed , it 's my21 r e c o l l e c t i o n t h a t Judge Bar ton a l so i n d i c a t e d t h a t22 he had t a k ~ n thousands o f d o l l a r s - - t h a t h i s wif e23 had t aken t hous ands o f d o l l a r s from your f i rm fo r24 c o u r t r e p o r t i n g s e r v i c e s and t h a t t h a t u l t i m a t e l y25 c r e a t e d a c o n f l i c t . As I r e c a l l , you prov ided t he

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    34/137

    1 case law about t h a t , and t h a t le d to h is2 d i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n on o r a bou t - - with in th e same3 month, l a t e r in th e month.4 Q That was your second mot ion to d i s q u a l i f y5 Judge Bar t on . Cor rec t ?6 A Yes.7 Q In th e first motion to d i s q u a l i f y Judge8 Ba r ton , d i d n ' t you a l l e g e unde r oa th t h a t he caused9 t he dea th of your mother?

    10 A You know, I t hough t you were go ing to11 b r in g t h a t up, so I have a w r i t t e n s t a t e m e n t a bou t12 t h a t .

    Q314 s t a t e m e n t .

    Well , I want - - I d o n ' t want a w r i t t e nI want an answer to my q u e s t i o n . Did

    15 you f i l e a s t a t emen t under oa th t h a t Judge Ba r ton16 had caused th e dea th o f your mother?17 A No. You' re misquot ing th e - - you ' r e18 m is quo t ing t h a t .19 Q I 'm r ead ing from your motion which i s20 submi t t ed October 5, 2009 unde r pena l t y o f p e r j u r y .21

    22

    AQ

    Can I r e f e r to my no t es?L et me f i n i sh my ques t ion , Mr. G i l l e s p i e

    23 Quote , As a proximate cause of Judge B ar t on ' s24 a c t i o n s , P l a i n t i f f ' s mother , Penelope G i l l e s p i e ,25 died September 16 , 2009.

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    35/137

    A Yes.2 Q Mr. G i l l e s p i e , you had some t r a i n i n g as3 p a r a l e g a l . Correc t?4 A I took two or t h r e e c l a s s e s as a5 p a r a l e g a l .6 Q And I b e l i e v e one o f your i n s t r u c t o r s wa7 Judge Demers?89

    A

    QYes.Uh-huh. And d i d n ' t you r e c e i ve some t yp

    10 of award o r acco lade from him fo r your - - fo r your11 s t u d i e s ?

    AQ

    I d o n ' t r e c a l l .Okay. Mr. G i l l e s p i e , you 've been

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    r e p r e s e n t i n g y o u r s e l f fo r s e v e r a l y e a r s . Cor rec t ?AQ

    17 Correc t?18

    19

    20

    21

    AQ

    AQ

    Yes.You have an account wi th West law.

    No l onge r .But you d id a t one t ime .Yes.

    Correc t?

    You know what t he ph ra se "prox imate22 cause" means, d o n ' t you, s i r ?23 A Yes. And I b e l i e v e t h a t Judge B ar ton wa24 n e g l i g e n t as to th e F l o r i d a Rules o f J u d i c i a l25 Admin i s t r a t ion pursuan t to Rule 2 .250 , pa rag raph A,

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    36/137

    1 paragraph 1 1 pa rag raph B. The t ime s t a nda r d fo r a2 c i v i l trial case i s 18 months from f i l i n g to f i n a l3 d e p o s i t i o n .4 Pursuan t to Rule 2.545 "Case Management 15 (a) I Purpose . Judges have" "Judges and l awyer s6 have a p r o f e s s i o n a l o b l i g a t i o n to conclude7 l i t i g a t i o n as soon as it i s r ea sonab ly and j u s t l y8 p o s s i b l e to do s o . "9

    10 Con t ro l .Pursuan t to Rule 2 .545(b) I "Case

    The trial judge s h a l l t ake c o n t r o l of all11 case s a t an e a r l y s t age in th e l i t i g a t i o n and s h a l l12 c o n t r o l t he p rog re s s o f th e case t h e r e a f t e r u n t i l13 th e case i s de te rmined . The trial judge s h a l l t ake14 s p e c i f i c s t e p s to moni to r and c o n t r o l th e pace o f15 l i t i g a t i o n . "16 And t h a t r e l a t e s to t h i s j u ry t h i s17 c i v i l j u r y case was f i l e d August 11 th 1 2005 unde r18 Rule 2. 250 (a) (1) (b ) . The case should have conc lude19 18 months l a t e r on o r about February 11 th 1 2007.20 Judge Bar ton assumed - - assumed c o n t r o l o f th e case21 Febr ua r y 13 th 1 2007 and n e g l i g e n t l y managed th e cas22 c o n t r a r y to Rule 2 .545 .23 Judge Bar ton d id no t engage case24 management fo r a pe r i od o f one yea r fo l low ing the25 motion to withdraw by Mr. Bauer on October 28 th .

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    37/137

    1 Judge B ar ton a l l owed t h i s case t o l angu i sh and2 f a i l e d to perform case management d u t i e s imposed by3 Rule 2 .545 . Three ye a r s and t h ree months l a t e r ,4 Judge Bar ton was still p r e s i d i n g ove r t he ca se when5 he was d i s q u a l i f i e d fo r cause , May 24 th , 2010. So6 Judge Bar ton was n e g l i g e n t w i th r ega rd t o the case7 management .8 Then t he re was a second s e t of neg l igenc9 r egard ing h is f a i l u r e to conduct a hea r ing on a

    10 c la im o f exempt ion and r e q u e s t fo r a hear ing se rved11 August 14 th , 2008 by Mr. Bauer . A c la im o f12 exempt ion s t a t e s i n r e l e v a n t p a r t , "The fo l l ow ing13 exempt ions from ga r n i s hmen t app ly to the P l a i n t i f f ,

    I

    14 N ei l G i l l e s p i e , h e r e i n as s t a t e d . 1, head o f fami ly15 wages. A, P l a i n t i f f prov ides more o f than one h a l f16 of t he suppo r t fo r a c h i l d o r o t h e r dependent and17 have n e t ea rn ings o f $500. o r l e s s p e r week." The18 o t h e r dependent r e f e r r ed to my mothe r , Penelope19 G i l l e s p i e , who was abou t 77 o r 78 yea r s o ld a t t h a t20 t ime s u f f e r i n g from A lzhe im er ' s demen t i a .21 Q L et me s top you t h e r e . I 'm going to g iv22 you as much t ime as you need to answer it, b u t a re23 you t e l l i n g me unde r oa th t h a t your mothe r was24 de c l a r e d by a c o u r t to be your dependent?25 A Not by a c o u r t , no.

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    38/137

    1 Q

    2 dependent?3

    4

    5

    6

    AQA

    Q

    Was she d e c l a r e d by anyone to be your

    Decla red?Yes, sir.No.But y o u ' r e t e l l i n g me t h a t you be l i eve

    7 you have a b a s i s to d e c l a r e h e r as a dependent unde8 the ga rn i s hm e n t s t a t u t e ? I j u s t want to make su re9 I 'm c l e a r t h a t t h a t ' s what y o u ' r e con t end i ng ,

    10 Mr. G i l l e s p i e .11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    A She was dependen t because she c o u l d n ' t dany t h i ng by h e r s e l f . She was dependent on me tod r i v e h e r . She c o u l d n ' t d r iv e a c a r . I had t o t akh e r t o h e r d o c t o r s ' appo i n t men t s .me to run th e household fo r h e r .

    She depended upoShe was i n c a p a b l e

    of doing t h a t . She depended upon me to cook h e r17 meals .18 Q What ' s th e l e g a l d e f i n i t i o n of a19 dependent , Mr. G i l l e s p i e , unde r th e ga rn i s hm e n t20 s t a t u t e ?21 A I don ' t know .22 Q But you a s s e r t e d t h a t she was y o u r23 dependent . Correc t ?24 A Mr. Bauer a s s e r t e d t h a t she was a25 dependent .

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    39/137

    1

    2 you?Q

    AQ

    And you m a i n t a i n e d t h a t p o s i t i o n , d i d n ' t

    R e l y i ng on my a t t o r n e y , y e s .Okay. Now, Mr. G i l l e s p i e , you 've r e a d a

    34

    5 bunch o f i n f o r m a t i o n . Not i n one word o f t h a t have6 I h e a r d a n y t h i n g t h a t s a ys t h a t Judge James M.7 B a r t o n , I I c a us e d - - p r o x i m a t e l y c a u se d th e d e a t h o8 y o u r m o t h e r .9

    10

    AQ

    Wel l , w e ' r e n o t done y e t .W e l l , let me a sk you t h i s , Mr. G i l l e s p i e

    11 E v e r y t h i n g you ' ve j u s t r e a d , you d i d n ' t i n c l u d e i n12 your mo t ion t o d i s . q u a l i f y J u d g e B a r t on t h a t you13 s u b m i t t e d on O c t o b e r 5 t h , 2009 , d id you?14

    15

    AQ

    No, it w a s n ' t in t h e r e .Okay. And you knew t h a t t h i s a f f i d a v i t

    16 was o f th e t ype t h a t Judge B ar ton h ad no ability to17 c o n t e s t th e f a c t u a l a c c u r a c y , and you i n t e n t i o n a l l y18 chose to l e a v e o u t what you c o n s i d e r e d to be19 i m p o r t a n t i n f o r m a t i o n t h a t would e x p l a i n t h e c o n t e x20 o f a s t a t e m e n t l i k e t h i s . I s t h a t what you ' r e21 telling me?22 A No. What I 'm telling you i s t h a t t h a t23 was w r i t t e n a b o u t two weeks after my m o t h e r ' s d e a t h24 and I was i n p r o f o u n d g r i e f . And I was d e v a s t a t e d ,25 and I , q u i t e f r a n k l y , w a s n ' t e v e n aware o f all t h e s

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    40/137

    1 r u l e s t h a t th e judge had v i o l a t e d .2 Q Okay. Then a t th e t ime t h a t you s t a t e d3 under oa th "As a proximate cause o f Judge B a r t o n ' s4 a c t i o n s , P l a i n t i f f ' s mother , Pene lope G i l l e s p i e ,5 d i ed September 16 th , 2 0 0 9 , " what ac t i ons d id Judge6 Bar ton t ake t h a t prox ima te ly caused th e d e a t h of7 your mother? Mr. G i l l e s p i e , with t r a i n i n g , you know8 what th e phrase "proxima te cause" means, d o n ' t you?9 A I have a l a ym a n ' s unde r s t and ing . I 'm n o

    10 an a t t o r n e y , and I d o n ' t know what l e g a l - -11 Q Did your - - d id your mothe r a t t e nd one12 c o u r t hea r i ng?13

    14

    AQ

    She came down to th eWith Judge Bar ton?

    15 Judge Bar ton ne ve r even met your mother ,16 d id he?17

    18

    AQ

    No, he d i d n ' t meet h e r .Judge Bar ton neve r spoke to y o u r mother

    19 by t e l ephone , d id he?20

    21

    AQ

    22 d id he?23

    24

    AQ

    No.Judge Bar ton neve r wro te to your mothe r ,

    No.But you p u t unde r p e n a l t y of p e r j u r y t h a

    25 Judge Bar ton prox ima te ly caused th e dea t h o f your

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    41/137

    1 mother wi thou t any exp l ana t i on whatsoever . Isn't2 t h a t t r u e , s i r ?

    I 'm g iv ing you th e exp lana t ion now.4

    AQ I don ' t want th e exp lana t ion now. I wan

    5 you to tell me whether o r no t you pu t th e6 exp lana t ion in t h i s a f f i d av i t unde r pena l t y o f7 pe r j u r y .8 A I don ' t th ink t h a t it needed to be t h a t9 comprehens ive .

    10 Q You were t r y i ng to ge t Judge Bar ton o f f11 th e case , and you were wi l l i ng to say any th ing t h a t12 you cou ld to ge t him o f f th e ca s e . I s t h a t no t13 t rue?14 A No. And I be l i eve a t t h a t t ime you were15 aware t h a t you had pa id money to th e judge , and t h a16 u l t ima t e l y le d to h is d i s qu a l i f i c a t i o n .17 Q Mr. Gi l l e s p i e , i s it you r t e s t imony unde18 oa th r i gh t now t h a t I pa id money to Judge James19 Bar ton?

    A

    Q

    You pa id - - l e t me r eph rase t h a t .Yes, s i r , I th ink you shou ld .THE WITNESS: May I consu l t with my

    20

    21

    22

    2324

    25

    counse l?MR. RODEMS: I t h ink t h a t ' s a g r e a t

    idea . Why don ' t we t ake a f ive -minu te break?

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    42/137

    1

    2

    3

    I 'm going to go to t he r e s t room. I would l i kemy pape rs n o t to be d i s t u r bed whi le I 'm gone .

    (Recess from 11:27 a .m. to 11:32 a .m. )4 BY MR. RODEMS:5 Q Mr. G i l l e s p i e , i s it y o u r c o n t e n t i o n t h a6 I pa id money to Judge James Bar ton?7 A Your law f irm pa id money to Judge8 B a r to n ' s wife in con junc t ion with h e r c o u r t9 r epo r t i ng s e r v i ce t h a t le d to th e d i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n

    10 of Judge Bar t on , and t h a t t h a t t r a n s a c t i o n happened11 a t th e - - a t th e t ime o f th e first mot ion to12 d i s q u a l i f y , and you f a i l e d to d i s c l o s e t h a t to me o13 Mr. Bauer .14 Q Mr. G i l l e s p i e , you a re aware t h a t I and15 my law f irm neve r wrote a check to Judge B a r t o n ' s16 wife , a r e n ' t you?17

    18

    A I d o n ' t have your r e sponse in f r o n t o f mto know whethe r t h a t ' s t r ue o r n o t . I b e l i e v e you

    19 sen t me check numbers and amounts t h a t you p a id to20 Judge B a r to n ' s wi fe .21

    22

    23

    QA

    Q

    Judge B a r to n ' s w ife o r a company?Well , I s a i d h e r c o u r t r epo r t i ng companyAnd w e re n ' t t hose payments fo r cop ie s of

    24 d e p o s i t i o n s in ano the r l e g a l ac t i on t aken by ano the25 a t to rney?

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    43/137

    1 A I d o n ' t remember all th e d e t a i l s , you2 know, wi t hou t having th e document to r e f r e s h my3 mind.4 Q So i s your t e s t i mony r e c a n t e d t h a t I p a i5 money to Judge Bar ton?6

    7

    8

    9

    A

    QA

    Q

    Yes.A ll r i g h t .And I apo l og i ze fo r t h a t miss t a t emen t .Do you have any c la ims a g a i n s t anyone fo

    10 damage to any prope r ty t h a t you own t h a t have n o t11 been f i l e d as a l a w s u i t - -12

    13

    A

    QNo.

    wi th in the l a s t fou r yea r s?14 Do you b e l i e v e t h a t you 've been th e15 v ic t im o f f raud o r m is re p re s e n t a t i o n in th e purchas16 of p r o d u c t s o r s e r v i ce s a t any t ime with in th e l a s t17 f i v e yea r s?18 A Other than o u t s id e t h i s - - the se l e g a l19 proceed ings , no.20 Q Do you b e l i e v e t h a t you have - - do you21 be l i eve t h a t any o r a l c o n t r a c t you have e n t e r e d i n t o22 with in th e l a s t fou r yea r s has been breached by23 anyone o r any e n t i t y ?24

    25

    A

    QCan you r e p e a t t ha t ?Do you b e l i e v e t h a t any o r a l c o n t r a c t

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    44/137

    1 t h a t you 've e n t e r e d i n t o with any person o r e n t i t y2 has been breached wi th in the l a s t fou r yea r s?34

    5

    A

    QA

    6 any t h i ng .7 Q

    An o r a l c o n t r a c t ?Yes, sir.I - - I d o n ' t - - I c a n ' t th ink o f

    Do you b e l i e v e t h a t any w r i tt e n c o n t r a c t8 t h a t you have e n t e r e d i n t o has been bre a c he d w i th in9 th e l a s t f ive yea r s?

    10 A Other t han t h i s l a w s u i t and Mr. Bauer ,11 no.12 Q Okay. Other than Mr. Bauer , do . you13 b e l i e v e t h a t any a t t o r ney has engaged in l e g a l14 m a l p r a c t i c e in th e r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of you in th e l a s15 two yea r s?16

    17

    18

    19

    AQAQ

    No. I mean, o t h e r than your f i rm and - -Did you unders t and th e ques t ion?Can you r e p e a t i t ?Has my law f irm r e p re s e n t e d you w i th in

    20 th e l a s t two yea r s?21

    22

    AQ

    No.Okay. With in th e l a s t two y e a r s , has an

    23 l awyer commit ted l e g a l m a l p r a c t i c e in th e24 r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f you?25 A Other than - - you know, o t h e r t han

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    45/137

    1 Mr. Bauer - - and I 'm n o t su re a bou t t he t i m i ng - -2

    34

    5

    QAQ

    Okay.- - no.A ll r i g h t . Do you have any c la ims

    a g a i n s t any h e a l t h - c a r e p r o v i d e r s ? Doctors ,6 c h i r o p r a c t o r s , os teopa ths , f o o t d o c to r s , anyone who7 prov i des m e dic a l t r ea tmen t? Do you be l i eve t h a t an8 person o r e n t i t y t h a t ' s prov i ded medica l t r e a tm e n t9 to you, i n c lu d in g d e n t a l t r e a tm e n t , w i th in th e l a s t

    10 two yea r s has commit ted neg l i gence?11

    12

    AQ

    No.With in th e l a s t f o u r yea rs , has anyone

    13 conver t ed any o f your p e r s o n a l p r o p e r t y ? And when14 say "conve r t ed , " I mean t aken it wi t hou t your15 pe rmis s ion .16

    17

    18

    AQ

    Can you r e p e a t t h a t ques t ion?Yes, s i r .With in th e l a s t f o u r yea rs , has any

    19 person t aken y o u r p ro p e r ty wi t hou t your pe rmis s ion ,20 so t h a t you b e l i e v e you have a claim a g a i n s t t h a t21 person fo r money damages fo r t h e f t ?22

    23

    24

    25

    AQAQ

    No.Okay.No.

    Do you have any p a t e n t s ?

    Do you have any c o p y r i g h t s t h a t have bee

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    46/137

    1 v i o l a t e d w i t h i n t h e l a s t fou r yea r s?2 A I 1 m go ing to sa y - - I 1 m n o t even s u r e3 what a c o p y r i g h t i s 1 and I 1 m go ing to upda te my4 p r e v i o u s answer and say I 1 m n o t r e a l l y even s u r e5 what a p a t e n t i s

    Okay.- - b u t I don 1 t t h i n k I have one .

    678

    QAQ A ll r i g h t . O t h e r t ha n the l a w s u i t t h a t 1

    9 pend ing in th e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t Middle10 D i s t r i c t o f F lo r id a 1 Ocala D i v i s i o n 1 do you have an11 c l a im s t h a t any pe r s on o r e n t i t y has v i o l a t e d any o12 s t a t e o r f e d e r a l r i g h t s r e g a r d i n g ha nd ic a ps o r13 d i s a b i l i t i e s ?14

    15

    16

    A Well 1 th e f e d e r a l l a w s u i t 1 t h a t wouldc ove r what 1 S happened in t h i s c a s e . Righ t?

    Q Mr. G i l l e s p i e 1 o t h e r t ha n th e c l a im s t h a17 a re pend ing in th e l a w s u i t t h a t i s pend ing in th e18 U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t in th e Middle D i s t r i c t o f19 F l o r i d a 1 Ocala D i v i s i o n / do you have any c l a im s t h a20 you 1 re aware o f a g a i n s t any p e r s o n o r e n t i t y fo r21 v i o l a t i o n o f y o u r r i g h t s 1 f e d e r a l o r s t a t e 122 r e g a r d i n g h a n d i c a p s o r d i s a b i l i t i e s ?23 A I would sa y no 1 b u t I would a l s o sa y24 t h a t t h a t c o m p l a i n t proba b ly needs to be amended .25 Q Okay. Have you b een employed w i t h i n th e

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    47/137

    l a s t f o u r yea r s?A No.Q Mr. G i l l e s p i e , d id you f i l e

    1

    234

    56789

    MR. RODEMS: What a re we up to? Number2?

    THE REPORTER: Yes.MR. RODEMS: I 'm going to make Number

    th e motion to d i s q u a l i f y Judge Bar t on .(Exh ib i t 2 marked fo r i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . )

    2

    10 MR. RODEMS: I 'm going to make Number 311 th e Emergency Motion to D is q u a l i fy Judge12 Martha Cook, which was se rved on November 1 s t ,13 2 0 1 0 .14 (Exh ib i t 3 marked fo r i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . )15 BY MR. RODEMS:16 Q Mr. G i l l e s p i e , i s t h i s a copy of th e17 emergency motion to d i s qua l i fy Judge Cook t h a t you18 f i l e d on t h a t da t e?19

    20

    21

    22

    AQ

    AQ

    Yes, t h i s looks l i ke it.May I see t h a t ?(Tender ing document . )As p a r t of t h i s motion to d i s q u a l i f y

    23 Judge Cook, d id you ask th e Cour t to t r a n s f e r t h i s24 case to be ha nd le d by th e Communist P a r t y of Cuba25 and F id e l Ca s t ro?

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    48/137

    1

    2

    AQ

    May I se e what y o u ' r e r e f e r r i n g to ?I ' m look ing a t Pa ra gra ph 20. The pages

    3 a re n o t numbered, which r e a d s , quo te , Upon4 i n f o r m a t i o n and b e l i e f , Mr. F i d e l Ca s t ro i s by5 p ro fe s s io n an a t t o r n e y a t law and c u r r e n t l y th e6 F i r s t S e c re t a ry o f th e Communist P a r t y o f Cuba.7 Noth ing in S e c t i o n 3 8 . 1 3 F l o r i d a S t a t u t e s l i m i t s th8 s e l e c t i o n o f a Judge ad l i t em to a F l o r i d a l i c e n s e d9 a t t o r n e y o r manda tes a F l o r i d a c o u r t . C l e a r l y th e

    10 F l o r i d a c o u r t s have n o t b een a b l e t o l a w f u l l y11 a d ju d i c a t e t h i s l a w s u i t . The R e p u b l i c o f Cuba i s12 th e n e a r e s t s o v e r e i g n t o t h e s t a t e o f F l o r i d a .13 Mr. Ca s t ro s t u d i e d law a t th e U n i v e r s i t y o f Havana14 and ho lds a Docto r o f Laws d e g r e e . The U n i v e r s i t y15 o f Havana , founded in 1 7 2 8 , c u r r e n t l y o f f e r s a16 F a c u l t y o f Law. G i l l e s p i e would a c c e p t Mr. Cas t ro17 o r h is de s igne e as Judge ad l i t e m .18

    19

    AQ

    Yes.Do you b e l i e v e you have any c l a im s fo r

    20 money damages a g a i n s t F i d e l Ca s t ro o r Cuba?21 A No.22 Q D id you w r i t e to P r e s i d e n t Barack Obama23 a b o u t t h i s c a se ?24 A Yes.25 Q Do you b e l i e v e you have any c l a im s fo r

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    49/137

    1 money damages a g a i n s t P r e s i d e n t Barack Obama?2

    3AQ

    No.Did you f i l e documents with J u s t i c e

    4 Clarence Thomas o f th e Uni ted S t a t e s Supreme Cour t5 r ega rd ing t h i s l awsu i t ?67

    AQ

    Yes.Do you b e l i e v e you have any c l a i ms fo r

    8 money damages a g a i n s t J u s t i c e Cla re nc e Thomas?9

    10

    AQ

    No.Did you w r i t e t o Governor Rick S c o t t

    11 abou t t h i s l awsu i t ?12 A Not s p e c i f i c a l l y a bou t t h i s l aw s u i t .13 There were o th e r t h in g s , b u t I d id w r i t e to Governo14 S c o t t , y e s .15 Q Do you be l i eve you have any c l a i ms fo r16 money damages a g a i n s t Governor Rick S c o t t ?17

    18

    AQ

    No.Do you b e l i e v e you have any c l a i ms fo r

    19 money damages a g a i n s t any judge ass igned to t h i s20 case t h a t has n o t been f i l e d in th e l a w s u i t pending21 in th e Uni ted S t a t e s D i s t r i c t Cour t Middle D i s t r i c t22 of F l o r i d a , Ocala Di v i s i on?23

    24

    25

    AQ

    Can you r e p e a t t h a t l a s t p a r t again?Yes.Do you b e l i e v e you have any c l a i ms fo r

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    50/137

    1 money damages a g a i n s t any j udge a s s i g n e d to t h i s2 case t h a t has no t been f i l e d a s p a r t o f th e l a w s u i t3 p e n d i n g in th e Uni ted S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t , Middle4 D i s t r i c t o f F lo r id a , Ocala Di v i s i on?5

    67

    A Well , Judge N i e l s e n w a s n ' t added to th et h a t c om pla in t , if that's what y o u ' r e a s k i n g .

    Q Do you b e l i e v e you have any money - -8 c l a im s fo r money damages a g a i n s t Judge N i e l s e n ?9 A I d o n ' t q u i t e unders t and what you mean b

    10 money damages , b u t11 Q L et me c l a r i f y . Do you b e l i e v e t h a t12 Judge N i e l s e n s hou ld be o r d e r e d to pay you money13 damages fo r a n y t h i n g he has done t h a t you b e l i e v e14 wronged you?15 A E i t h e r t h a t o r it 's a m a t t e r fo r th e16 J u d i c i a l Q u a l i f i c a t i o n s Commission in th e form o f17 whatever k ind o f d i s c i p l i n e t h a t t he y mete o u t .18 Q A ll r i g h t . On th e b a s i s o f t h a t answer19 t h e n , I would ask you what c la im do you have a g a i n s20 Judge N i e l s e n t h a t you b e l i e v e he may owe you money21

    22

    damages fo r ?Defamat ion?

    I s it n e g l i g e n c e ? Breach o f c o n t r a c tV i o l a t i o n o f y o u r r i g h t s u n d e r th e ADA

    23 What do you b e l i e v e t h a t Judge N i e l s e n d i d t h a t24 e n t i t l e s you to make a c la im fo r money damages25 a g a i n s t him?

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    51/137

    1 A It would be t hose k inds o f c la ims , t he2 C i v i l Righ t s and ADA.3 Q What, s p e c i f i c a l l y , d id Judge N i e l s e n do4 t h a t v i o l a t e d your r i g h t s under th e Americans with5 D i s a b i l i t i e s Act?6 A I t h i nk he f a i l e d to r e s t r a i n your - -7 your b e h a v i o r t owards me t h a t was in v i o l a t i o n o f8 th e ADA.9 Q What p a r t of th e ADA governs my

    10 i n t e r a c t i o n wi th you?11 A I t h in k when you o b s t r u c t someone based12 on t h e i r d i s a b i l i t y , t h a t t h a t might f a l l under13 t h a t .14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    QAQAQ

    T h a t ' s your answer?Yes - -

    your answer?t h a t ' s my answer .

    Okay. What d id I do19 based on your d i s a b i l i t y ?

    I s t h a t --

    to o b s t r u c t you

    20 A Well , you had knowledge o f my d i s a b i l i t y21 from your p r i o r - - your f i r m ' s p r i o r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n22 Q L et me s top you t h e r e . W e ' l l go t h rough23 eve ry th ing one by one , b u t I want to s top you a t24 t h a t p o i n t . What g i ves you th e b a s i s to t e s t i f y25 unde r oath t h a t I had some p r i o r knowledge o f your

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    52/137

    1 d i s a b i l i t y b e c a u se my law f i rm a t one t ime2 r e p r e s e n t e d you?3 A Because you have a c c e s s - - first o f all,4 it's a smal l f i rm, a t h r ee - memb er - - t h r e e - p a r t n e r5 f i rm . And I r e c a l l r e a d i n g case law t h a t s a i d in6 t hose c i r c u m s t a n c e s it's r e a s o n a b l e to assume t h a t7 th e l awyers t a l k among t h e m se l v e s a b o u t th e c l i e n t s8 and t h a t th e l awyers have a c c e s s t o t h e c l i e n t s '9 files.

    10 Q Do you have any p e r s o n a l knowledge t h a t11 a t any t ime t h a t my law f i rm was r e p r e s e n t i n g you12 t h a t I knew a n y t h i n g a b o u t you, o t h e r t ha n th e f a c t13 t h a t you came in one t ime an d I was i n t r o d u c e d to14 you on one oc c a s ion?

    Can you r e p e a t t h a t a ga in?516

    AQ Do you have any p e r s o n a l knowledge t h a t

    17 o t h e r t ha n be ing i n t r o d u c e d to you one t ime d u r i n g18 th e p e r i o d t h a t my law f i rm r e p r e s e n t e d you t h a t I19 had any i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t you , y o u r case o r y o u r20 m e d i c a l c o n d i t i o n s , w h a t e v e r t he y may be? Or a re21 you making an assumpt ion?22

    23

    AQ

    I t h i n k p a r t o f it i s a s su m p t i o n .Dur ing th e t ime t h a t my law f i rm

    24 r e p r e s e n t e d you, d id I e ve r a ppe a r a t any25 d e p o s i t i o n s w i th you?

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    53/137

    1 A I t h i n k it was Chr i s B a r k e r t h a t a ppe a re2 a t th e d e p o s i t i o n w i th Mr. Cook.3 Q Th a t w a s n ' t my q u e s t i o n , Mr. G i l l e s p i e .4 My q u e s t i o n was: During th e t ime t h a t my law f i rm5 r e p r e s e n t e d you , d id I e v e r a ppe a r a t any6 d e p o s i t i o n s w i th you?78

    AQ

    No.During th e t ime t h a t my law f i rm

    9 r e p r e s e n t e d you, a re you aware o f me s i g n i n g any10 documents r e l a t i n g to y o u r c a se ?11

    12

    AQ

    No.Dur ing th e t ime t h a t my law f i rm

    13 r e p r e s e n t e d you, d id Mr. Cook a t any t ime a d v i s e yo14 t h a t he had d i s c u s s e d your case w i th me?15 A Yes. I mean n o t j u s t you b u t th e - - th e16 t h r e e o f you.17 Q Did Mr. Cook a t any t ime tell you ,18 Mr. G i l l e s p i e , t h a t he , Mr. Cook, had d i s c u s s e d w i t19 me your med ica l c o n d i t i o n ?20 A I t h i n k what he s a id was he w i l l d i s c u s s21 t h i s c a s e w i th h i s p a r t n e r s to d e c i d e w h e t h e r o r n o22 t he y want to r e p r e s e n t me, and I g o t a letter back23 s a y i n g t h a t "we" - - meaning you and Mr. Ba rke r - -24 d id n o t want to t a ke t h e c a s e .25 I mean, I d o n ' t have th e letter i n f r o n t

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    54/137

    1 o f me, b u t Mr. Cook was r e p re s e n t i n g to me t h a t you2 f i rm and th e p a r t n e r s made a d e c i s io n , I g u e s s ,3 b a se d on my m e d i c a l r e c o r d s and th e f a c t s an d th e4 law t h a t you d i d n ' t want to t ake t h e c a s e .5 Q Do you have any p e r s o n a l knowledge a b o u t6 any how me and my two p a r t n e r s c o n d u c t o u r law7 f i r m ' s b u s i n e s s ?8 A O uts ide o f th e letters you p r o v i d e me an9 what Mr. Cook s a i d , no.

    10 Q Do you have any p e r s o n a l knowledge t h a t11 Mr. Cook a t any t ime c o n s u l t e d w i th me a b o u t any12 c a s e s i n v o l v i n g you?13

    14

    A

    QJ u s t as I e x p l a i n e d b e f o r e .I s t h e r e any letter where Mr. Cook s a y s ,

    15 " I spoke to Ryan C h r i s t o p h e r Rodems a b o u t y o u r16 c a s e , 11 Mr. G i l l e s p i e ?17 A No.

    18 Q Anyth ing t h a t even r e m ote ly sounded l i k e19 t h a t ?20 A Well , when I g e t a letter t h a t s a y s t h a t21 "We have c o n s i d e r e d your c a se " and it 's j u s t22 Mr. Cook and h is two p a r t n e r s , I 'm assuming t h a t th23 t h r e e o f you made a d e c i s i o n .24 Q And on t h a t b a s i s you have r e p re s e n t e d to25 t h i s C o u r t - - numerous o c c a s i o n s - - t h a t I knew

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    55/137

    1

    234

    about your d i s a b i l i t y . Isn't t h a t t r ue?T ha t ' s r i g h t .

    Q Mr. G i l l e s p i e , let me ask th e q u e s t i o naga i n fo r th e f i n a l t im e . Do you have any p e r s o n a l

    5 knowledge t h a t dur i ng th e t ime t h a t my law f i rm6 r e p re s e n t e d you, I knew any t h i ng about your medica l7 cond i t ion?89

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    THE WITNESS: This seems l i ke th e sameques t ion ove r aga in .

    MR. CASTAGLIUOLO: It does seem l i k e th esame q u e s t i o n , Mr. Rodems.asked and answered .

    It seems l i k e it's

    MR. RODEMS: Well , I would l i ke ananswer t o t he q u e s t i o n .

    MR. CASTAGLIUOLO: But he a l r e a d yanswered it.

    MR. RODEMS: H is answer wasn ' t r e spons ivto th e ques t ion . I want to know if he hasp e r s o n a l knowledge t h a t I knew any t h i ng a bou th is medica l c o n d i t i o n dur ing the t ime t h a t Ir e p re s e n t e d th e law - - t h a t he was r e p re s e n t e dby my law f i rm .A No.

    24 BY MR. RODEMS:25 Q Do you b e l i e v e you have any c l a i ms fo r

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    56/137

    1 money damages aga i n s t Judge Claud i a Isom?2 A As s e t f o r t h in th e l awsu i t .3 Q Okay. Do you be l i eve you have any c la im4 fo r money damages aga i n s t Judge Martha Cook?

    A6 Who i s Judge Martha Cook ' s husband?

    A Wil l iam Sedgeman.8 And do you unde r s t and t h a t he worked fo r9 a bank?

    10 A He worked fo r a bank? Yes.11 Did you eve r have a bank accoun t a t any12 bank t h a t Judge Cook 's husband worked fo r a t any13 t ime?14 A Yes. I mean, when you say "worked f o r , "15 I th ink he owned th e bank o r was th e CEO o f th e16 bank .17 Q Did you a t any occas ion in t h i s l awsu i t18 whi le Judge Cook was pre s i d i ng ove r th e case ask he19 to r ecuse he r s e l f because you had a bus i ne s s20 r e l a t i on sh i p with he r husband?21 A Yes.22 Q Did you, in f a c t , have a bus i ne s s23 r e l a t i on sh i p with he r husband?24 A A bus i ne s s r e l a t i on sh i p with a bank t h a t25 i s i d en t i f i e d with him as he founded it, and he ' s

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    57/137

    1 th e CEO, in t h a t - - in t h a t se n se .2

    3Q When d id you have a b u s i n e s s r e l a t i o n s h i p

    wi th Judge Cook ' s husband? B e fo re t h i s l a w s u i t4 began o r a f t e r t h i s l a w s u i t aga in?5

    6

    7

    A A f t e r .Q When d id you have a b u s i n e s s r e l a t i o n s h i p

    wi th Judge Cook ' s husband? Before Judge Cook becam8 th e p r e s i d i n g j udge o r a f t e r ?9

    10

    AQ

    A f t e r .Isn't it t r u e t h a t you opened a bank

    11 accoun t in Judge Cook ' s husband ' s bank as a way to12 t r y and g e t h e r d i s q u a l i f i e d from t h i s cas e?13

    14

    AQ

    No.Did you open a bank accoun t a t Judge

    15 Cook ' s husband ' s bank a f t e r th e t ime Judge B ar ton16 e n t e r e d a f i n a l j udgment a g a i n s t you in f a v o r o f my17 c l i e n t s fo r o v e r $11,000?18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    A I 'm s o r r y .MR. RODEMS:

    p l e a s e ?

    Can you r e p e a t t h a t ?Can you r ead it ba c k ,

    ( R epo r t e r r eads a s r e q u e s t e d . )A Yes .

    23 BY MR. RODEMS:24

    25

    QA

    Was it a sav ings o r check ing accoun t ?Check ing .

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    58/137

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    59/137

    1 " e x h a u s t e d , " p r o b a b l y a b e t t e r word i s I - - I went2 to a number o f them and d i d n ' t seem to - - w a s n ' t3 ab le to g e t a mo r tg ag e . And I was f a m i l i a r w i th4 t h i s bank even b e f o r e I knew t he pe op le be h ind it.5 J u s t because it was a f i x t u r e in my n e i g h b o rh o o d ,6 and it was a c o m f o r t a b l e l andmark . And I , you know7 went to a n o t h e r mar k e t to se e if th e f i n a n c i n g he re8 would be any b e t t e r t han in O c a l a .9 Q Did you a t th e t ime t h a t you opened th e

    10 bank a c c o u n t know t h a t Judge Cook ' s husband worked11 t h e r e ?12 A J u s t - - I d i d n ' t know r e a l l y all th e13 d e t a i l s .

    Q T h a t ' s n o t what I asked you.MR. RODEMS: Can you r e a d back th e

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    q u e s t i o n I asked?

    AQAQ

    (Re por t e r r e a d s as r e q u e s t e d . )I t h i n k so .What do you mean you t h i n k so?I ' m no t s u r e o f all th e d e t a i l s .D id you do any s e a r c h e s t o f i nd o u t who

    22 Judge Cook' s husband was?23 A Wel l , I found t h a t o u t by - - you know,24 when I was s e a r c h i n g fo r d i s a b i l i t y i s s u e s .25 Q You found o u t th e name o f Judge C o o k ' s

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    60/137

    1 husband when you were sea rch ing fo r d i s a b i l i t y2 i s sues?

    Yes.4

    AQ And when was t ha t ? Before o r a f t e r Judg

    5 Cook became th e pr e s i d i ng judge on t h i s case?67

    A Well , Judge Cook seemed h o s t i l e t owardsd i s a b i l i t y . I was t r y i ng to unde r s t and why. So I

    8 sea rched fo r Judge Cook and d i s a b i l i t y and l e a rn e d9 t h a t she had a daugh t e r t h a t was d i s a b l e d , and t h a t

    10 Judge Cook a p p a re n t l y l i ked to speak to th e pr e s s11 about it and g e t s t o r i e s in th e p a p e r a bou t h e r12 d isab led d a u g h t e r and so fo r th and so on. And th e13 d a u g h te r ' s name has th e h u s b a n d ' s l a s t name, n o t14 Cook.15 Q And it was a t t h a t p o i n t t h a t you were16 do ing t h i s r e s e a r c h t h a t you became aware t h a t Judg17 Cook's husband was a f f i l i a t e d wi t h th e bank?18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    AQ

    Yes.And it was a f t e r t h a t t h a t you opened a

    bank accoun t . Cor rec t ?AQ

    Yes.So you knew t h a t Judge Cook 's husband

    23 worked fo r th e bank t h a t you were open ing th e24 account wi th a t th e t ime you opened th e a c c o u n t .25 I s n ' t t h a t t r u e , Mr. G i l l e s p i e?

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    61/137

    1

    2

    AQ

    Yes .And then you moved to d i s q u a l i f y Judge

    3 Cook on th e b a s i s t h a t you had a b u s i n e s s4

    5

    r e l a t i o n s h i p with h er husband . Cor re c t ?A Th a t was one o f many - - a number o f

    6 i s s u e s .7 Q And t hen you wrote a mot ion to d i s q u a l i f8 Judge Cook in which you r e i t e r a t e d i n f o r m a t i o n you9

    10

    11

    12

    had l e a r n e d a b o u t h e r d a u g h t e r . Isn't t h a t t r u e ?AQA

    Well , Judge Cook p u b l i s h e d - Isn't t h a t t r u e ?Yes. I would add t h a t y o u ' r e t w i s t i n g i

    13 and t a k i n g it ou t o f c o n t e x t .14 Q Mr. G i l l e s p i e , you p l a c e d th e name o f15 Judge Cook ' s da ugh te r i n to l e g a l f i l i n g s and a c c us e16 Judge Cook o f hav ing an i mos i t y towards d i s a b l e d17 p e o p l e , d i d n ' t you, s i r ?18 A And I e x p l a i n e d t h e b a s i s fo r t h a t , y e s ,19 b e c a u se in th e d i s a b i l i t y groups t h a t I have been20 i n v o l v e d w i th where you have p a r e n t s o f d i s a b l e d21 c h i l d r e n and a d u l t s w i th d i s a b i l i t i e s , t h e r e ' s o f t e22 a c o n f l i c t . And it's an u n d e r s t a n d a b l e c o n f l i c t ,23 and I b e l i e v e t h a t t h a t c o n f l i c t was th e b a s i s fo r24 d i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n .25 Q No, a c t u a l l y , Mr. G i l l e s p i e , what you

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    62/137

    1 were t r y i n g to do i s you were t r y in g to i n t i m i d a t e2 Judge Cook and make h e r s t e p a s i d e , w e r e n ' t you?3 J u s t l i k e

    No.5

    AQ D i d n ' t you tell Judge Ni e l sen t h a t he wa

    6 h o s t i l e towards p ro se l i t i g a n t s and had a s a d i s t i c7

    8

    q u a l i t y ?A

    D i d n ' t you file t h a t under o a t h , as w e l l ?Wel l , to answer your Judge Cook q u e s t i o n

    9 she a c t u a l l y , from what I remember o f h e r r e s p o n s e ,10 a gre e d wi th me. And she wro te in h e r o r d e r o f11 d e n i a l s a y ing t h a t if you b r i n g t h i s back a g a i n12 w i th t h e p r o p e r - - I f o r g e t th e e x a c t t e r m i n o l o g y ,13 b u t if you b r i n g it back w i th th e p r o p e r14 c e r t i f i c a t i o n o r w h a t e v e r , t h a t sh e would d i s q u a l i f y15 h e r s e l f , so - -16 Q Your t e s t im ony i s Judge Cook agreed w i th17 you t h a t she was h o s t i l e towards d i s a b l e d p e o p l e ?18

    19

    A No, b u t if you have th e o r d e r , I'll - -I'll quo te p r e c i s e l y from it. Tha t - - my

    20 u n d e r s t a n d i n g was t h a t Judge Cook b e l i e v e d , by what21 I r e a d in h e r r e s p o n s e , t h a t she would f i n d t h e22 b a s i s fo r a d i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n on d i s a b i l i t y if I23 submi t t ed t he document in a d i f f e r e n t form.24

    25

    QA

    T h a t ' s y o u r r e c o l l e c t i o n ?Yes.

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    63/137

    1 Q Do you b e l i e v e you have any c la ims fo r2 money damages a g a i n s t Judge Cook ' s husband?3

    4

    AQ

    No.Do you be l i eve you have any c l a i ms fo r

    5 money damages a g a i n s t Judge Cook?6 A Well , you 've asked t h a t a l r e a d y , and I -7 yes , as s e t f o r t h in th e f e d e r a l l a w s u i t .8 Q Okay. Do you be l i eve you have any c l a i m9 fo r money damages a g a i n s t Judge Arnold?

    10

    11

    A

    Q

    No.Do you be l i eve you have c la ims fo r money

    12 damages a g a i n s t David Rowland, R-o-w -1-a -n -d?13

    14

    A

    Q

    As s e t fo r th in th e l aw s u i t .I s t h e r e anyone t h a t i s employed o r

    15 a f f i l i a t e d with the T h i r t e e n th J u d i c i a l C i r c u i t t h a16 you b e l i e v e you have c la ims fo r money damages17 a g a i n s t t h a t you have n o t i nc luded as p a r t o f your18 f ede r a l l awsu i t ?19 A Well , I - - I c a n ' t r e a l l y t h in k o f anyon20 r i g h t now, no.21 Q Okay. Do you be l i eve you have any c l a i m22 a g a i n s t th e Marion County S h e r i f f ' s Off i ce fo r mone23 damages?24

    25

    AQ

    The Marion County S h e r i f f ' s Off i ce?Yes, sir.

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    64/137

    1

    2

    AQ

    No.Any i nd i v i dua l s employed with th e Marion

    3 County S h e r i f f ' s Off i ce?4

    5

    AQ

    No.Do you b e l i e v e you have any c l a i ms fo r

    6 money damages a g a i n s t th e Hi l l sbo rough County7 S h e r i f f ' s Off i ce?8

    9

    AQ

    No.Do you b e l i e v e you have any c l a i ms fo r

    10 money damages a g a i n s t any i n d i v i d u a l s employed by11 th e Hi l l sbo rough County S h e r i f f ' s Off i ce?12

    13

    A

    QNo.Has anyone a f f i l i a t e d with th e

    14 Hi l l sbo rough County S h e r i f f ' s O f f i c e been named as15 defendan t in your f e d e ra l l a w s u i t ?16

    17

    A

    QI c a n ' t th ink o f one .A ll r i g h t . Are you f a m i l i a r wi t h an

    18 o rg a n i z a t i o n known as YouSue.org?19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    A Yes. Well , I would say I d o n ' t know t h ait's an o rg a n i z a t i o n . YouSue .org i s a domain name.

    Q Who owns i t ?THE WITNESS: Do I have to answer t ha t ?(Mr. Cas tag l iuo lo and t he wi tnes s

    c o n fe r r i n g o f f th e r e c o rd . )A It's in th e trust's name.

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    65/137

    1 Q I t hough t you f i l e d a document o r2 r e p re s e n t e d to th e Court t h a t th e only a s s e t in th e3 t r u s t was a home in Ocala . I s t h a t a c c u ra t e o r n o t4 a c c u r a t e ?5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    A Can you r e p e a t t h a t ques t ion?MR. CASTAGLIUOLO: L et me i n t e r j e c t t h a t

    I made t h a t r e p r e s e n t a t i o n to Mr. Rodems,because it was my unde r s t and ing t h a t was whatyour t e s t i mony was going to b e .

    THE WITNESS: Uh-huh.MR. CASTAGLIUOLO: So I d o n ' t want to be

    the one to j eopa rd ize h is p o s i t i o n , b u tMR. RODEMS: Well , l e t me ask th eMR. CASTAGLIUOLO: I may have

    m is unde r s tood what he - -MR. RODEMS: P e r f e c t l y u n d e r s t a n d a b l e .

    Unders t andab l e , Counsel .q u e s t i o n .

    Let me ask th e

    The t r u s t t h a t we've - - t h a t we 'ver e f e r r e d to when we s a i d th e t r u s t , w e ' r egoing to mark t h i s as E x h i b i t 4 . The - - and Iw i l l r e p r e s e n t on th e reco rd t h a t p u r s u a n t toJudge A r n o l d ' s o r d e r , th e t r u s t document i s tobe cons ide red c o n f i d e n t i a l and n o t d i s s e m i n a t eo u t s id e of t h i s case wi t hou t th e C o u r t ' s

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    66/137

    1 p e r m i s s i o n .2 ( E x h i b i t 4 marked fo r i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . )3 BY MR. RODEMS:4 Q When I r e f e r t o t he t r u s t today , I 'm5 r e f e r r i n g to th e Revokab le I n t e r Vivos T r u s t6 Agreement t h a t a ppe a r s to have been c r e a t e d on7 F e b ru a ry lO th , 1997 . Do you see E x h i b i t 4,8 Mr. G i l l e s p i e ?9

    10

    AQ

    Yes, uh-huh .I s t h i s a copy t h a t you prov i ded to me

    11 t o d a y d u r i n g t h e d e p o s i t i o n ?12

    13

    AQ

    Yes.Okay. To your knowledge , h as t h i s

    14 Revokab le I n t e r Vivos T r u s t Agreement e v e r been15 amended?16

    17

    18

    19

    AQAQ

    I b e l i e v e it has amendments on t h e r e .Are t he y a t t a c h e d to i t ?Yes.Okay. And i s it your t e s t im ony toda y

    20 t h a t YouSue .o rg i s owned by t h i s t r u s t ?21 A My u n d e r s t a n d i n g t h a t - - I ' m n o t r e a l l y22 c e r t a i n a b o u t whe the r - - I mean, th e YouSue .o rg23 domain name does no t a ppe a r in th e t r u s t . I mean,24 t h i n k t h a t - - that's c l e a r from r e a d i n g t h e t r u s t .25 I ' m no t r e a l l y s u r e a b o u t what th e l e g a l s t a t u s o f

  • 7/29/2019 Depo of Neil Gillespie [Taken 6-21-11]

    67/137

    1 domain names a r e . I know t h a t to me t he y j u s t seem2 l i k e an e x p e n se .3 Q Who - - who i s th e i n d i v i d u a l t h a t c r e a t e d4 th e domain name YouSue.org?

    6 How d id you go a b o u t c r e a t i n g i t ?7 I t hough t abou t it.8 And t he n what d id you do?9 I r e g i s t e r e d it.

    10 Where d id you r e g i s t e r i t ?

    13 Well , I 'm n o t r e a l l y su re how t hey s p e l l14

    15 How d id you r e g i s t e r it?